Current irrigation water use efficiency assessment methods cannot accurately predict irrigation water use, leading to greater errors in water use efficiency assessment. Therefore, a new method based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is proposed to evaluate the irrigation water use efficiency of cotton fields in Xinjiang. The super efficiency DEA model is established by introducing the super efficiency DEA method and adjusting the predicted amount and actual amount of irrigation water use. Genetic algorithm is used to improve the super-efficiency DEA model. The indexes obtained include the indexes reflecting water resources conditions, water use situation and economic aspects, and the statistical sequence model of cotton field irrigation water information is established. Given the demand and actual usage of irrigation water for cotton fields, the numerical relationship between the demand and usage was defined by integrating the two indices as the index data set. The experimental results show that the proposed method can accurately predict the water consumption of cotton field irrigation, and the efficiency of irrigation water consumption can reach 90%.

  • Data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is proposed to evaluate the irrigation water use efficiency in drylands.

  • The considered indexes include the reflecting water resources conditions, water use situation and economic aspects.

  • The proposed method can accurately predict the water consumption of cotton field irrigation.

Xinjiang in China is located in the middle of Eurasia, with low annual rainfall and high evaporation, which is a typical continental arid area. Because of its vast area and a large area of cultivated land per capita, it has gradually developed into the most important agricultural production area in China. Cotton, as an important cash crop in Xinjiang, due to its significant regional advantages and unique climate environment, has increased its planting area year by year, from 940,000 hm2 in 2002 to 2254,000 hm2 in 2017. In the past 15 years, the planting area of cotton has expanded by 2.4 times, accounting for more than 75% of the total cotton planting area in China, and the cotton output has accounted for more than 85% of the total output in China (Qiao et al. 2021). Therefore, the renewal of agricultural machinery and the development of cultivation techniques in Xinjiang are of great significance to further reduce the cost of cotton planting and increase cotton yield. Water resources are directly related to human survival and socioeconomic development. With the rapid development of China's economy, the consumption and demand for water resources in all walks of life are gradually increasing. As a country short of water resources, China is facing a major problem in improving the utilization efficiency of water resources (Zhang et al. 2020). Water resources are the lifeblood of agricultural development, and limited water resources carrying capacity has become an important factor restricting the sustainable development of agriculture. Although agricultural water consumption is relatively high, the efficiency of farmland water utilization in Xinjiang is far from the expected value due to excessive water consumption and low efficiency of management measures.

Huang & Qu (2021) constructed the comprehensive evaluation index system and index classification standard of water efficiency in the Hetao irrigation area, using the improved entropy method to weight the evaluation index, combining the set pair analysis theory (SPA) and variable fuzzy set theory (VFS), and applied the SPA–VFS coupling model to carry out the classification evaluation of water efficiency in Hetao irrigation area. The results show that the water efficiency grade of Hetao irrigation area obtained by SPA–VFS coupling model is grade III, which is consistent with the evaluation results of VFS model and SPA model, indicating that the SPA–VFS coupling model is reasonable and feasible for the classification evaluation of water efficiency of Hetao irrigation area; the stable ranges of the level eigenvalues obtained by SPA–VFS coupling model and VFS model are 3.12–3.17 and 3.00–3.33, respectively. The stable range of SPA–VFS coupling model is significantly smaller than that of VFS model. The evaluation results are more reliable and more suitable for the level evaluation of water efficiency in the Hetao irrigation area. Yu et al. (2020) proposed an intelligent precision irrigation decision-making model for ginseng planting under the Internet of Things. The environmental information such as soil moisture content and air temperature and humidity are collected in real-time through the information acquisition and transmission module, and the information is transmitted to the information processing module through ZigBee network for comparative analysis with the knowledge base threshold. In the irrigation decision-making execution module, combined with the standard threshold of the collected environmental data knowledge base, the decision-making mathematical model is established to calculate the water demand of ginseng, predict the irrigation time and the optimal amount of irrigation, feedback the decision-making results to the control terminal, and control the irrigation valve through the single chip microcomputer to realize accurate irrigation.

The above existing methods can not accurately predict irrigation water consumption, resulting in large errors in water efficiency evaluation. Therefore, an evaluation method of irrigation water efficiency of the cotton fields in Xinjiang based on super efficiency DEA model is proposed.

Super efficiency DEA model

The data envelopment analysis (DEA) method is a nonparametric estimation method. Its main idea is to explore the reasons for the mismatch between the input and output of non-DEA effective units and the improvement direction by projective analysis on the production front, and then adjust the input of resources and the output of benefits, so as to maximize the input and output efficiency of decision making units (DMUs) (Adhikari et al. 2020; Baloch et al. 2021). The DEA method can evaluate the relative efficiency among different DMUs (DMUs) with multiple input and output variables, and has the advantage that it does not require a specific production function form for multiple input and output indicators. The evolution of DEA method can be divided into three stages.

The first stage is the traditional CCR model (A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes) and the BCC model (Banker, Charnes and Cooper) research stage does not consider the expected output and the non-expected output. The second stage is to solve the non-expected output problem in the traditional DEA model: input–output transposition method, forward attribute conversion method, and directional distance function method. Currently, all three approaches are used, but the first two lead to efficiency skews or inefficiencies, and the third approach is the most widely used, with the disadvantage of not taking relaxation variables into account. In the third stage, based on the first two stages, ANDERSEN and others put forward the super efficiency DEA model, which effectively solved the problem of relaxation variables. The super efficiency DEA model breaks through the limitation that there are several DMU efficiencies of 1 in the traditional DEA method, so it is impossible to compare the efficiency of DMU further and can compare the efficiency of all DMUs. As shown in Figure 1, assume that there are five decision units A, B, C, D, and E, of which A, B, C, and D are all DEA efficient, and the frontier of efficiency formed by them is the broken line ABCD, C is on the frontier of efficient production, and the efficiency of its DMU is 1; E is enveloped by the frontier of efficiency ABCD, and the efficiency of its DMU is less than 1, so the E is inefficient.
Figure 1

Super-efficiency DEA model.

Figure 1

Super-efficiency DEA model.

Close modal

When calculating the efficiency of the DMU, C is excluded from the reference set of DMUs, so the production frontier changes from ABCD to ABD, when the LOC'/lOC is greater than 1 (lOC', lOC is OC 'and OC length). For the original DEA inefficient decision-making unit E, in the DEA model, the frontier of efficiency is still ABCD, which is consistent with the efficiency obtained in the DEA model, and is still lOE'/lOE < 1 (lO', lOE is O'and OE length).

The water use efficiency of cotton field irrigation belongs to the problem of input and output efficiency evaluation. Therefore, the DEA model is selected to evaluate the water use efficiency of cotton field irrigation. It has n DMUs of the same type, i input variables and j output variables. The objective function is shown in the following formula.
formula
(1)
The constraint conditions are shown in the following formula.
formula
(2)
where represents the comprehensive efficiency (i.e. the irrigation water efficiency of cotton fields in this paper), the greater its value, the higher the comprehensive efficiency, represents the input variable of the evaluated decision-making unit, represents the output variable of the evaluated decision-making unit, represents the input of the provincial administrative region, represents the output of the j provincial administrative region, represents the combination coefficient of each unit, and represents the relaxation variable, is the covariable.

Resource utilization efficiency

The analysis of water resources utilization efficiency belongs to the problem of efficiency evaluation of more inputs and more outputs. Because the water resources utilization efficiency involves many aspects, this paper intends to quantify the water resources utilization efficiency from the perspectives of ‘water resources conditions-water use conditions-social economy’ and ‘water use conditions-social economy’ (Ye et al. 2019; Lenka et al. 2021). Thus, the indicators obtained include those that reflect the conditions of water resources, water use, and economics, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Evaluation index system of water resources utilization efficiency

Indicator categoryIndex NoIndicator name
Water use
Economic situation
Water resources conditions
Indicator category
Water use
Economic situation 
A1 Agricultural irrigation water consumption/100 million m3 
A2 Water consumption of forest, animal husbandry, fishery, and livestock/100 million m3 
A3 Industrial water consumption/100 million m3 
A4 Domestic water consumption of residents/100 million m3 
A5 Urban public water consumption is 100 million m3 
A6 Ecological environment water consumption/100 million m3 
Water resources conditions
Indicator category
Water use
Economic situation 
B1 Per capita GDP/yuan 
B2 Primary industry/100 million yuan 
B3 Secondary industry/100 million yuan 
B4 Tertiary industry/100 million yuan 
Water resources conditions C1 Precipitation/100 million m3 
C2 Surface water resources/100 million m3 
C3 Groundwater resources/100 million m3 
C4 Total water resources/100 million m3 
Indicator categoryIndex NoIndicator name
Water use
Economic situation
Water resources conditions
Indicator category
Water use
Economic situation 
A1 Agricultural irrigation water consumption/100 million m3 
A2 Water consumption of forest, animal husbandry, fishery, and livestock/100 million m3 
A3 Industrial water consumption/100 million m3 
A4 Domestic water consumption of residents/100 million m3 
A5 Urban public water consumption is 100 million m3 
A6 Ecological environment water consumption/100 million m3 
Water resources conditions
Indicator category
Water use
Economic situation 
B1 Per capita GDP/yuan 
B2 Primary industry/100 million yuan 
B3 Secondary industry/100 million yuan 
B4 Tertiary industry/100 million yuan 
Water resources conditions C1 Precipitation/100 million m3 
C2 Surface water resources/100 million m3 
C3 Groundwater resources/100 million m3 
C4 Total water resources/100 million m3 

Improvement of super efficiency DEA model based on genetic algorithm

Because the genetic algorithm has the characteristics of global search and high efficiency, the genetic algorithm is used to obtain the global optimal solution of super-efficient DEA. Genetic search in space of vector can improve the value of the vector in the process of genetic evolution, and it is a method to solve the super efficiency DEA model. The global optimal solution of the model can be transformed into a linear programming problem by bringing the vector values from the genetic search into the objective function.

, u represent the relevant weight vector, if we want to call the unit equal or effective proportion, then all the DMU j meet , and the unit p is the best efficiency.

In the solution of the super efficiency DEA model, if the of the DMU is positive, the DMU is the best efficiency.

Construction of statistical sequence model of irrigation water information in cotton field

The data of cotton field irrigation water are a set of nonlinear economic series, which can be analyzed and evaluated by using modern statistical sequence processing methods. In the stage of modeling the data of cotton field irrigation water, the method of constructing a statistical sequence model is adopted to analyze the characteristics of the situation of cotton field irrigation water in the irrigation system. A combined sampling model for the data of cotton field irrigation water under full directional monitoring is set up, and the information of cotton field irrigation water under monitoring is expressed as follows:
formula
(3)
where is the evaluation component of cotton field irrigation water, expressed as a d-dimensional random function, and each data set has a normal correlation. Assuming that R conforms to the K distribution function, the state transition equation of the cotton field irrigation water model is expressed as:
formula
(4)

In the above formula, represents the vector combination of cotton field irrigation water data, and represents the interference component.

For the data series of cotton field irrigation water, feature recombination shall be carried out. Any point is taken in the reorganized feature space, the nearest neighbor of the reorganized space of the data series of cotton field irrigation water shall be S, and the distance between d for and shall be defined. With i as the abscissa and j as the ordinate, the vector distance of the nonlinear state parameter of the data of cotton field irrigation water shall be:
formula
(5)
The average mutual information algorithm is used to calculate the embedding dimension of cotton field irrigation water reconstruction space. With the increase of m to , the sliding average window of optimized cotton field irrigation water data is obtained as follows:
formula
(6)
The geometric invariants of the information sequence of irrigation water in the cotton field are calculated, and the embedded spatial state vector of the nonlinear sequence of irrigation water in the local cotton field is obtained. The predictor calculation is set to calculate the probability confidence interval of the cotton field irrigation water series as . In the m -dimensional cotton field irrigation water data series, the -dimensional vector formed by combining the characteristics of the above statistical series is:
formula
(7)
when is larger than , it is considered as the projection of statistical information feature points of cotton field irrigation water, so as to construct the statistical sequence model of cotton field irrigation water.

Super efficiency DEA model and information fusion of irrigation water in cotton field

Based on the regression test of the irrigation water evaluation of cotton field by using the results of descriptive statistical average analysis and the classification recognition of the big data of irrigation water of cotton field by using the super-efficiency feature clustering method, the optimal design of the irrigation water evaluation model of cotton field is carried out. This paper presents an irrigation water evaluation model of cotton field based on a super-efficiency DEA model. Construct a recursive diagram for the water used for cotton field irrigation, which is calculated as follows:
formula
(8)
where is the Heaviside function and r is the neighborhood radius. Through quantitative recursive analysis of irrigation water sequence in cotton field, the neighborhood matrix reorganized by a nonlinear economic sequence is obtained:
formula
(9)
Since r is small enough, the super efficiency DEA evaluation function of cotton field irrigation water data meets the following requirements:
formula
(10)
Let be the function of super efficiency DEA evaluation and the distance from the statistical characteristic direction of cotton field irrigation water evaluation. When , we get:
formula
(11)
when the convergence criterion is satisfied, the quantitative recurrence point of the state evaluation characteristic quantity of the super efficiency DEA model is :
formula
(12)

According to the information fusion results of irrigated cotton field irrigation water, principal component analysis and adaptive game decision-making are carried out to evaluate and test the cotton field irrigation water of the irrigation system (Liu et al. 2019; Sarangi et al. 2019).

Construction of water consumption prediction model

Crop evapotranspiration prediction

  • A.
    The prediction of crop water evapotranspiration in cotton field adopts the following calculation formula:
    formula
    (13)

In the above formula, L represents crop evapotranspiration in the cotton field; represents crop coefficient in the cotton field; represents soil moisture correction coefficient in the cotton field; represents crop evapotranspiration in reference cotton field (Garibay et al. 2019).

  • B.

    Prediction of evapotranspiration of reference cotton field

The evapotranspiration of reference cotton field mainly reflects the influence of meteorological factors on the evapotranspiration of reference cotton field. According to the correlation analysis of the evapotranspiration of the reference cotton field and meteorological factors, the highest correlation factor can be selected to determine the temperature factor, so as to predict the evapotranspiration of the reference cotton field (Han et al. 2019).

Through analyzing the change of crop temperature with time, the relationship between temperature and crop growth cycle is analyzed, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Relationship between temperature and crop growth cycle

Period differentiationIncubation period days/dayMaximum temperature/°CMinimum temperature/°C
20 26 24 
30 27 25 
40 27 23 
50 25 22 
60 24 20 
70 22 18 
80 15 13 
Period differentiationIncubation period days/dayMaximum temperature/°CMinimum temperature/°C
20 26 24 
30 27 25 
40 27 23 
50 25 22 
60 24 20 
70 22 18 
80 15 13 

Generally, it belongs to the warming period in early August and the cooling period in late August. The calculation formula of local reference crop evapotranspiration predicted by temperature data is as follows:
formula
(14)
formula
(15)

In the above formulas, represent the meteorological factors during the warming period and the cooling period, respectively; represent the power of the natural logarithms during the warming period and the cooling period, respectively; T represents the temperature (Li et al. 2019).

The actual correction value is obtained by multiplying the difference between the temperature actually measured 10 days prior to the start of the forecast and the historical trend value for the same period by a daily attenuation factor (Younis et al. 2020). The sum of the former measured values and the actual corrected values is the final predicted temperature. The accuracy of temperature forecasts can be effectively improved if the real-time weather forecast information is published and the forecast value is properly corrected.

Determination of groundwater recharge

The determination formula of groundwater recharge is as follows:
formula
(16)

In the above formula, represents the amount of groundwater recharge; represents the evapotranspiration of crops in cotton fields on day i; represents the empirical coefficient relating to the soil in cotton fields in irrigated areas; and represents the depth of groundwater.

Soil moisture calculation

The calculation formula of soil moisture in the irrigated cotton field is as follows:
formula
(17)

In the above formula, , respectively, represent the soil volume moisture content, cotton crop evapotranspiration, effective rainfall, cotton crop irrigation, and groundwater recharge in the wet area on day i; represents the soil volume moisture content in the wet area; , respectively, represent the water increased due to planned wetting, the wetting ratio of irrigated crop groups and the water increased in the wet layer (Zare et al. 2020).

Water consumption prediction model

The prediction formula of water consumption is as follows:
formula
(18)

In the above formula, V represents the predicted water consumption; represents the soil water capacity of the cotton field; represents the minimum suitable water content of the cotton field.

Evaluation of water use efficiency in cotton field irrigation area

Given the irrigation water demand and the actual usage of cotton fields, the numerical relationship between the demand and usage can be defined by integrating the two indicators into an index data set, which can be expressed as follows:
formula
(19)
where represents the relaxation parameter of irrigation water, represents the actual demand irrigation water data set, and represents the irrigation water use function.
In determining the correlation coefficient of irrigation water demand in cotton field, a comprehensive efficiency model is introduced to calculate the optimal ratio of demand to use, and the value of the ratio is used as the optimal solution. In order to obtain the optimal ratio of demand to usage, after changing the value of relaxation parameters in the above numerical relationship, the relaxation parameters are defined as positive and negative numerical states, and the redundancy rate generated by irrigation water demand under different numerical states is calculated. The calculation formula can be expressed as follows:
formula
(20)
where represents the irrigation water demand function and represents the scale efficiency function.

Taking the irrigation water demand value corresponding to the redundancy rate as the processing object, the maximal point of the scale efficiency function is calculated in the plane range. By synthesizing the data of irrigation water demand and actual usage in the irrigation area of cotton fields with the same attributes, the dual linear processing method is adopted to add a constraint condition at the critical point, and the optimal solution is the most value of the constraint condition in the calculation formula (19). When eliminating the weak effective effect in the optimal solution, the scale in the irrigation area of cotton fields is estimated to drive the parameters, and the critical point and the optimal value are continuously combined into the above calculation formula (18). When the relaxation parameter is a numerical value of 1, the redundancy rate calculated at this time is the correlation coefficient of the final demand usage. Under the control of the coefficients, the DEA model was used to determine the environmental impact variables of cotton fields.

Under the above treatment process, the efficiency of all irrigation water use in the comprehensive cotton field irrigation area shall be calculated by using the irrigation water efficiency model. The numerical relationship can be expressed as follows:
formula
(21)
where represents the actual irrigation water demand, represents the maintenance cost, k represents the cotton field area, and j represents the divided cotton field irrigation area.

Based on the actual cotton irrigation data in a certain region in 2020 and meteorological data in the same period, the cotton field water holding capacity was 0.33 cm3/cm3, the minimum suitable soil water content was 0.155 cm3/cm3, and the groundwater recharge was negligible. Two time periods from 1 August 2020 to 10 August 2020 and from 20 August 2020 to 30 August 2020 were selected to verify the prediction model of water consumption for water-fertilizer and gas coupling water-saving irrigation equipment in small and medium-sized cotton fields.

Experimental parameter training and processing

The samples from 1 August to 10 August 2020 and 20 August to 30 August 2020 are divided into training sets and test sets. A total of 10 groups of training data are obtained from the two groups, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Ten groups of training data

Number of groupsTemperature/°CHumidity/%Light intensity/mW/cm2Stem flow/Rel.
20.5 61.5 2.91 0.13679 
20.3 66.2 2.36 0.12781 
20.5 62.8 3.93 0.78157 
20.3 68.1 4.19 0.03789 
21.2 55.6 4.79 0.48732 
26.2 49.8 2.17 0.78547 
25.5 43.9 2.89 0.18549 
28.4 48.3 2.12 0.66264 
29.1 44.2 2.67 0.18765 
10 29.5 46.1 1.56 0.19205 
Number of groupsTemperature/°CHumidity/%Light intensity/mW/cm2Stem flow/Rel.
20.5 61.5 2.91 0.13679 
20.3 66.2 2.36 0.12781 
20.5 62.8 3.93 0.78157 
20.3 68.1 4.19 0.03789 
21.2 55.6 4.79 0.48732 
26.2 49.8 2.17 0.78547 
25.5 43.9 2.89 0.18549 
28.4 48.3 2.12 0.66264 
29.1 44.2 2.67 0.18765 
10 29.5 46.1 1.56 0.19205 

Set the maximum number of training iterations to 5,000 times and the learning efficiency to 0.02. Train the sample data with the train function, and the training results are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Irrigation training results.

Figure 2

Irrigation training results.

Close modal

Actual water consumption

In order to guarantee the sampled data to be uniform order of magnitude, the input and output sample data should be preprocessed by using the mapminmax function in MATLAB toolbox.

The actual irrigation water consumption is shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Actual irrigation water consumption

Irrigation periodOrderIrrigation timeWater consumption/10,000 m3
Period 1
Period 2
Irrigation period 
Start 1 August 28.2 
1st time 5 August 39.4 
2nd time 10 August 44.8 
Period 1 Start 20 August 41.4 
1st time 23 August 38.1 
2nd time 26 August 49.0 
3rd time 30 August 46.8 
Irrigation periodOrderIrrigation timeWater consumption/10,000 m3
Period 1
Period 2
Irrigation period 
Start 1 August 28.2 
1st time 5 August 39.4 
2nd time 10 August 44.8 
Period 1 Start 20 August 41.4 
1st time 23 August 38.1 
2nd time 26 August 49.0 
3rd time 30 August 46.8 

Experimental results and analysis

Irrigation period 1

During irrigation period 1, the irrigation water consumption was tested using the Hetao Irrigation Area Comprehensive Water Efficiency Assessment Method proposed in Huang & Qu (2021), the IoT-based Irrigation Water Efficiency Assessment Method proposed in Yu et al. (2020) and the proposed method, as shown in Figure 3, respectively.
Figure 3

Predicted water consumption of three models in irrigation period 1.

Figure 3

Predicted water consumption of three models in irrigation period 1.

Close modal

It can be seen from Figure 3 that the comprehensive evaluation method of water efficiency in the Hetao irrigation area proposed in Huang & Qu (2021) and the evaluation method of irrigation water efficiency based on the Internet of things proposed in Yu et al. (2020) are quite different from the actual value. The maximum error of water consumption at three-time points is 100,000 m3. The irrigation water consumption predicted by the proposed method is basically similar to the actual value, and the maximum water consumption error is 5,000 m3.

Irrigation period 2

During irrigation period 2, the comprehensive evaluation method of water efficiency in the Hetao irrigation area proposed in Huang & Qu (2021), the evaluation method of irrigation water efficiency based on the Internet of Things proposed in Yu et al. (2020) and the proposed method are used to test the irrigation water consumption. The results are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Predicted water consumption of three models in irrigation period 2.

Figure 4

Predicted water consumption of three models in irrigation period 2.

Close modal

As can be seen from Figure 4, the predicted irrigation water consumption using the proposed method is basically similar to the actual value and the error is negligible. The comprehensive assessment method for water use efficiency of the Hetao irrigation area proposed in Huang & Qu (2021) and the assessment method for water use efficiency of irrigation based on the Internet of Things proposed in Yu et al. (2020) differ greatly from the actual value. Therefore, the application of water-fertilizer and gas coupling water-saving irrigation model for small- and medium-sized cotton fields is more reasonable and consistent with the actual value.

Evaluation results of irrigation water efficiency

In order to measure the accuracy of the evaluation results of the irrigation water efficiency of the proposed method, the ratio between the predicted irrigation water consumption and the actual water consumption is used to calculate the irrigation water efficiency. The specific results are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
Figure 5

Irrigation water efficiency in irrigation period 1.

Figure 5

Irrigation water efficiency in irrigation period 1.

Close modal
Figure 6

Irrigation water efficiency in irrigation period 2.

Figure 6

Irrigation water efficiency in irrigation period 2.

Close modal

According to Figures 5 and 6, compared with the references, the irrigation water efficiency of the proposed method can be as high as 90% during irrigation period 1 and irrigation period 2. This experiment shows that the proposed method has ideal practical performance.

In order to solve the problem of large errors in the irrigation water use efficiency evaluation method, a new method based on super efficiency DEA model was proposed in the Xinjiang cotton field. The DEA model of super efficiency is established to adjust the predicted and actual amount of irrigation water use. This paper constructs a statistical series model of cotton field irrigation water information, fuses the information of cotton field irrigation water, and constructs a prediction model of water consumption by crop evapotranspiration, groundwater recharge and soil moisture. After establishing the index data set, the numerical relationship between demand and usage was defined to evaluate the irrigation water use efficiency of cotton fields in Xinjiang. Experimental results show that the irrigation water consumption prediction of the proposed method has high accuracy, and the irrigation water use efficiency can reach 90%, which shows that the proposed method has better practicability.

The research is supported by Project of Renovation Capacity Building for the Young Sci-Tech Talents Sponsored by Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No.xjnkq-2020011).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Huang
Y. J.
&
Qu
Z. Y.
2021
Classifying irrigation water use efficiency in Hetao Irrigation District using SPA-VFS coupling model
.
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
37
(
11
),
85
92
.
Li
F.
,
Yu
D.
&
Zhao
Y.
2019
Irrigation scheduling optimization for cotton based on the aquacrop model
.
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
33
(
1
),
39
55
.
Qiao
X. J.
,
Shi
J. C.
&
Tan
L. L.
2021
Multi-scale spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in root-zone in film-mulched drip-irrigated cotton fields in anjihai irrigation zone, Xinjiang
.
Acta Pedologica Sinica
58
(
5
),
1202
1213
.
Sarangi
P. P.
,
Mishra
B.
&
Dehuri
S.
2019
Fusion of PHOG and LDP local descriptors for kernel-based ear biometric recognition
.
Multimedia Tools and Applications
78
(
8
),
9595
9623
.
Yu
H. L.
,
Han
J. B.
&
Li
W. S.
2020
Simulation of intelligent precision irrigation decision model for ginseng planting under the Internet of things
.
Computer Simulation
37
(
11
),
250
254
.
Zhang
D. W.
,
Wei
X.
&
Xu
H. J.
2020
Effects of silicon fertilizer on cotton growth, yield and quality
.
Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences
57
(
11
),
1998
2003
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).