To improve the performance of sprinklers that work under low pressure, a new type of automatic rotating sprinkler equipped with different water dispersion devices was designed and the jet diffusion angle and hydraulic performance of the new and original sprinklers were compared using experimental methods. The results indicate that, when the working pressure is below 200 kPa, the jet diffusion angle of the new sprinkler with the water dispersion device B is the largest. Although the pattern radius of the new sprinkler is slightly lower than that of the original, it is more effective in improving the combined coefficient of uniformity (CU) at lower working pressures. Specifically, when the working pressure was 100 kPa, the new sprinkler with the water dispersion device B, which has a square inner hole with a side length of 6.2 mm, improved the CU by 54.89% on average. Remarkably, the CU of the new sprinkler with water dispersion device B at a working pressure of 100 kPa was 6.65% higher than that of the original sprinkler at a working pressure of 200 kPa. The research results provide valuable insights into the design of sprinklers to improve the performance of low-pressure sprinkler irrigation systems.

  • A novel automatic rotating sprinkler (NARS) with a water dispersion device has been successfully developed.

  • The lower the working pressure, the more pronounced the effect of the NARS on improving the overlapped water application uniformity.

  • The NARS with water dispersion device B ensures that the water application rates within a local area are consistent.

Sprinkler irrigation equipment comprises water pumps, piping systems, monitoring systems, and sprinklers (Johar et al. 2018). It can save water, avoid damage to the soil structure, save time and effort, and adjust the field microclimate. Sprinklers are a critical component of sprinkler irrigation equipment, and their performance directly determines the quality of sprinkler irrigation. With the continuous development of science and technology, the sprinklers in sprinkler irrigation equipment gradually develop toward low-pressure operation conditions; thus, the entire sprinkler irrigation system has an energy-saving effect (Hui et al. 2021). The sprinkler, according to the working pressure, can be divided into low-pressure, medium-pressure, and high-pressure sprinklers, wherein low pressure is less than 200 kPa; medium pressure is between 200 and 500 kPa; high pressure is greater than 500 kPa (Gilley & Watts 1977). However, the lower working pressure of impact sprinklers reduces the degree of a jet breakup, worsening the sprinkler irrigation quality, i.e., leading to a shorter radius of throw, lower uniformity of combined sprinkler irrigation, and higher kinetic energy of water droplets, which can affect the yield and quality of crops (Issaka et al. 2018). Therefore, the hot and complex point of current research is to ensure better sprinkler irrigation quality under low-pressure conditions.

To improve the irrigation performance of impact sprinklers under low working pressure, current research is mainly focused on special-shaped nozzles (Chen et al. 2022), sprinkler aeration (Xiang et al. 2021), and water dispersion devices (Xu et al. 2012). Regarding special-shaped nozzles, researchers have exploited the asymmetric structural characteristics of nozzles with non-circular cross-sections to transform the axisymmetric flow of the water jet into non-axisymmetric, which increases the instability of the water flow and, in turn, causes the water jet to breakup and thus improve the sprinkler irrigation performance of impact sprinklers under low-pressure conditions. At present, several studies mainly concern the jet-breakup law of special-shaped nozzles under low working pressure and their hydraulic performance. For example, Sharma & Fang (2014) analyzed the breakup length, width, axis conversion phenomenon, and atomization degree of the jet ejected through special-shaped nozzles, and concluded that the jet fragmentation length of the non-circular nozzle was shorter than that of the circular one. Hua et al. (2019) simulated the jet-breakup characteristics of nozzles with different outlet shapes using the large-eddy simulation (LES) and volume-of-fluid (VOF) methods and revealed that, for non-circular nozzles, the jet breakup was more sufficient in the near-field region. Moreover, they achieved the best water distribution. Wang & Fang (2015) used Rayleigh's vibration theory to rationally explain the breakup mechanism of special-shaped nozzles. It was proved that this theory can better explain the liquid jet-breakup phenomenon. Jiang et al. (2020a, 2020b) investigated the surface wave shape, breakup process, and flow characteristics of the jet produced by special-shaped nozzles, and found that the special-shaped nozzle could not only promote the breakup of the jet but also improve the hydraulic performance of the sprinklers. Chen et al. (2011) found that the irrigation uniformity of special-shaped nozzles is higher than that of circular nozzles. Yuan et al. (2010) reported that special-shaped nozzles can reduce the intensity of raindrops and improve sprinkler irrigation uniformity. Hua et al. (2018) studied the effect of special-shaped nozzles on the hydraulic performance of impact sprinklers and concluded that non-circular nozzles can improve the water distribution uniformity of low-pressure sprinklers. Although special-shaped nozzles can improve sprinkler irrigation uniformity, this method can shorten the sprinkler pattern radius by about 5–20% (Zhou et al. 2017). In combined sprinkler irrigation, the number of sprinkler heads increases for the same sprinkler irrigation area, leading to an increase in investment at the early stage of developing the sprinkler irrigation system.

In aerated sprinklers, the gas disturbs the water flow by increasing the turbulence and causing the water jet to breakup; thus, the hydraulic performance of the sprinkler under low working pressure is improved. Currently, the research is mainly focused on the droplets of the jet breakup and the hydraulic performance of aerated sprinklers. For instance, Wang et al. (1989) found that the degree of atomization in multi-hole aeration is higher than that of single-hole aeration under low-pressure conditions. Lin et al. (2020) explored the effect of jet aeration on droplet structure and morphology and found that the droplet size decreases with the increase of the aerated mass ratio. Xiang et al. (2021) analyzed the droplet diameter distribution of aerated jets and concluded that the average water droplet diameter of aerated sprinklers is higher than that of unaerated ones. Jiang et al. (2020a, 2020b) found that the aeration of impact sprinklers can improve the radial water distribution as well as the overlapping uniformity. Although adding air to the sprinkler can improve its hydraulic performance, this method is not fully mature in sprinkler irrigation systems. This is mainly due to that if the aeration volume cannot be accurately controlled, the axial velocity of the jet will be attenuated, thereby affecting the hydraulic performance of the sprinkler (Wei et al. 2013).

In impact sprinklers equipped with a fixed water dispersion device, researchers in related fields have mainly used water dispersion devices to forcefully break the liquid column of the jet and improve sprinkler irrigation performance under low-pressure conditions. Since the method is relatively simple to implement, it has been widely promoted in the market of impact sprinklers. Li et al. (2019) found that fixed water dispersion devices can increase the jet diffusion angle, improve radial water distribution, and improve the uniformity of sprinkler irrigation. Jiang et al. (2019a, 2019b) investigated the initial breakup length of the jet under a fixed water dispersion device and derived an empirical equation for the sprinkler pattern radius related to the water dispersion device. Issaka et al. (2020) found that a fixed water dispersion device can improve the radial water distribution of an impact sprinkler, reduce the kinetic energy of water droplets, and improve sprinkler irrigation uniformity. Nevertheless, this method comes with certain limitations since, when the depth of the fixed water dispersion device inserted into the jet liquid column is shallow, the jet fragmentation degree is weak, and the effect of improving the hydraulic performance of the nozzle cannot be achieved. When the fixed water dispersion device penetrates deeper into the water, it can increase the fragmentation of the water jet and enhance the uniformity of the combined sprinkler irrigation; however, it will further reduce the radius of the throw. Therefore, in practical applications, it is difficult to precisely control the depth of the fixed water dispersion device inserted into the water jet liquid column and achieve optimal sprinkler irrigation performance.

Based on the above literature review and the present situation, it can be deduced that the methods employed to improve sprinkler irrigation performance under low working pressure have some flaws. To make the impact sprinkler have better hydraulic performance under low pressure, that is essential to transform the existing impact sprinkler and implement a new sprinkler with a novel water dispersion device. In this paper, three new types of automatic rotating sprinklers are designed, each of which is equipped with a novel water dispersion device. To test the performance of the new sprinkler heads, high-speed photographic experiments are conducted to compare and discuss the jet-breakup morphology of the new sprinklers and the prototype impact sprinkler (model: PY 15). Moreover, hydraulic performance experiments are performed to compare and discuss the hydraulic performance of the different sprinklers in detail. This work aims to provide a reference for the design and optimization of impact sprinklers under lower pressure.

Original impact sprinkler

In the study of jet breakup and hydraulic performance, a PY15 impact sprinkler was used as the original sprinkler (Figure 1). The nozzles used in this study and their associated structural parameters are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 1

Original sprinkler.

Figure 1

Original sprinkler.

Close modal
Figure 2

Nozzle with an external thread: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the nozzle.

Figure 2

Nozzle with an external thread: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the nozzle.

Close modal

Design of fixed water dispersion devices

To ensure that the structural parameters of the various fixed water dispersion devices are consistent with the parameters on the design drawings, 3D printing technology (Shahrubudin et al. 2019) was used to construct the fixed water dispersion devices.

Water dispersion device A and bracket design and installation

An increasing number of impact sprinklers are equipped with needle-shaped water dispersion devices (NSWDDs). Therefore, in this paper, NSWDD was taken as the research object. The NSWDD was manufactured according to the research results by Issaka et al. (2018), and the specific structure is illustrated in Figure 3, where D is the diameter of the NSWDD (6 mm), θ is the cone angle of the NSWDD (60°), h1 is the height of the nut (8 mm), and h is the total length of the NSWDD (53 mm). Figure 4 shows the bracket used to mount the NSWDD. To facilitate the installation of the NSWDD, there was an assembling remaining clearance of 0.1 mm (Boden et al. 1996) between the threaded hole inner diameter of the bracket and the NSWDD diameter. Moreover, it was ensured that the distance between the axis position of the threaded hole inner diameter of the bracket and the nozzle outlet was 50 mm. During installation, the cylindrical hole on the bracket was first fixed to the nozzle through bolts, and then, the NSWDD with external thread was screwed into the threaded hole on the bracket to complete the installation. To facilitate the description of the needle-type water dispersion device, hereinafter, it will be referred to as the water dispersion device A.
Figure 3

Water dispersion device A: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the water dispersion device A.

Figure 3

Water dispersion device A: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the water dispersion device A.

Close modal
Figure 4

Bracket for water dispersion device A and installation.

Figure 4

Bracket for water dispersion device A and installation.

Close modal

Water dispersion device B, C and bracket design and installation

Due to the jet-flow entraining the air, the cross-section of the jet-flow will become more prominent; thus, a ring-shaped water dispersion device (RSWDD) with a circular and square inner hole section was designed separately. When the water jet with a larger cross-section hits the RSWDD, the outer wall will cut the jet surface. Moreover, the inner holes of the RSWDD will eject the fluid of the jet core area. The fluid ejected from the outer wall will replenish the water at the near and middle positions of the radius of throw, while that ejected from the inner hole will replenish the water at the far end and the end of the radius of throw. The fluids on the jet surface and the core area complement each other to improve the hydraulic performance of the sprinkler.

A unified standard was established to assess the jet breakup characteristics and hydraulic performance of sprinklers with RSWDDs and NSWDDs. The RSWDD was first installed at a position 50 mm away from the nozzle outlet, then, the swingarm of the impact sprinkler was removed, and the impact sprinkler was set to not rotate under the working pressure of 100 kPa. By adjusting the structure size of the RSWDD inner hole, it was ensured that the spray distance of the jet was equal to that under the NSWDD. This way, the structural dimensions of the RSWDD were determined, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Structural parameters of water dispersion devices B and C

Typea (mm)b (mm)c (mm)d (mm)
6.2 11 – 
– 11 
Typea (mm)b (mm)c (mm)d (mm)
6.2 11 – 
– 11 

B: water dispersion device B; C: water dispersion device C.

In order to conveniently describe the RSWDDs with the square and circular inner holes, hereinafter, they will be referred to as water dispersion devices B and C, respectively. Figure 5(a) and 5(b) illustrates the structural diagrams of the fixed water dispersion devices B and C, respectively.
Figure 5

Fixed water dispersion devices: (a) water dispersion device B and (b) water dispersion device C.

Figure 5

Fixed water dispersion devices: (a) water dispersion device B and (b) water dispersion device C.

Close modal
Figures 6 and 7 depict the brackets used to install the water dispersion devices B and C. First, the small threaded hole 1 of the bracket with two cylindrical rods was connected with a boss structure (Figure 7), and then, the other end of the cylindrical rod was connected to the fixed water dispersion device B and C 1′ position (Figure 5). Finally, the sizeable threaded hole 2 of the bracket was connected to the nozzle with external threads (Figure 2). Figure 8 is the final assembly drawing of the structure. The cylindrical rod mainly played the role of fixing the water dispersion devices and ensuring that the distance between the water dispersion devices B, C, and A from the nozzle outlet was consistent.
Figure 6

Bracket for installing and fixing the water dispersion devices B and C: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the bracket.

Figure 6

Bracket for installing and fixing the water dispersion devices B and C: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the bracket.

Close modal
Figure 7

Cylindrical rod with boss: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the rod.

Figure 7

Cylindrical rod with boss: (a) two-dimensional model and (b) structure of the rod.

Close modal
Figure 8

Each component assembly.

Figure 8

Each component assembly.

Close modal

Novel automatic rotating sprinkler design

In order to hinder the effect of the varying rotating speed on the hydraulic performance of the sprinkler, an automatic rotating device was designed, which included a gear retarding device, a motor device, and a speed control device. Through the cooperation of these three devices, it is effortless to maintain the speed of the automatic rotating device consistent with the average speed of the impact sprinkler under different working pressures during regular operation.

The swingarm was removed from the original sprinkler, and the three devices designed to control the speed were installed on it. The purpose of this was to ensure that the new and original sprinklers had the same parameters (Figure 9). Finally, each of the water dispersion devices was installed on the automatic rotating device to form a new type of automatic rotating sprinkler (Figure 10).
Figure 9

Automatic rotating device.

Figure 9

Automatic rotating device.

Close modal
Figure 10

The automatic rotating sprinkler. Note: (a) automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A; (b) automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B; (c) automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C.

Figure 10

The automatic rotating sprinkler. Note: (a) automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A; (b) automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B; (c) automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C.

Close modal

Experimental set-up

High-speed photography experiment

The high-speed photography experiment was conducted in the Sprinkler Irrigation Laboratory of the Fluid Machinery and Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu University in China. The experimental equipment comprised a large water storage bucket with a capacity of 3 tons, a variable frequency pump (225QJ50-144-30KW) produced by Grundfos, Netherlands, an electromagnetic flowmeter with a measurement accuracy of ±0.5%, a pressure gauge with a range of 0–1 MPa, and an accuracy level of 0.4, PY15 impact sprinklers produced by Zhejiang Jinlong Sprinkler Irrigation Co., Ltd, automatic rotating sprinklers, water pipes, a dark screen, and an i-SPEED3 high-speed camera (Figure 11). The dark screen was used in the experiment to make the broken morphology of the jet clearer. The i-SPEED3 high-speed camera uses an AF-S Nikon 50 mm f/1.4 G lens to take high-quality images even in dark environments. During the experiment, the frame rate of high-speed photography was first set to 10,000 fps (the maximum frame rate of the i-SPEED3 model is 150,000 fps), and the exposure time was 10 μs. Then, the working pressure of the sprinkler was set to 100, 150, and 200 kPa, and finally, the direct shooting method was applied to capture the broken morphology and diffusion angle of the jet. To facilitate the study of the jet diffusion angle under the water dispersion device, the position of the water dispersion device was taken as a reference point, and the upper and lower boundaries of the jet affected by the device were measured using Auto CAD software. A diagram of the jet diffusion angle measurement is shown in Figure 12.
Figure 11

High-speed photography experiment.

Figure 11

High-speed photography experiment.

Close modal
Figure 12

Schematic diagram of jet diffusion angle measurement.

Figure 12

Schematic diagram of jet diffusion angle measurement.

Close modal

Hydraulic performance experiments

The experiments were conducted in the Sprinkler Irrigation Laboratory of the Fluid Machinery and Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu University in China. It is a windless sprinkler irrigation laboratory with a diameter of 44 m. The performance experiment equipment comprised an underground reservoir, a 30 kW centrifugal pump, an electromagnetic flowmeter with a measurement accuracy of ±0.5%, a pressure gauge with a range of 0–1 MPa and an accuracy grade of 0.4, water pipelines, valves, an original sprinkler, and automatic rotating sprinklers. The sprinklers were installed at the height of 1.5 m and perpendicular to the horizontal plane. The experimental layout is illustrated in Figure 13. Collectors with an inlet diameter of 0.2 m and a height of 0.6 m were arranged on the radial line with the sprinklers as the center. The distance between two collectors on the same radial line was 1 m, and the angle between the two radial lines was 45° (Figure 14). This experiment was conducted following the ISO 15886-3 (15886-3 2016) and ASAE Standards (Standard 2001). The radius of throw and radial water distribution of the automatic rotating sprinklers with different fixed water dispersion devices and the original sprinkler were measured under the working pressures of 100, 150, and 200 kPa. To assure the accuracy of the experimental results, the experimental duration under each working pressure was 1 h, each experiment was repeated three times, and then, the experimental results were averaged to obtain the final results. Since the working pressure of the sprinkler was less than 200 kPa, it belongs to the low-pressure operation state. When the working pressure equals 200 kPa, it belongs to the intermediate-pressure operation state. Consequently, this article compared and analyzed the jet-breakup characteristics and hydraulic performance of the automatic rotating sprinklers and the original impact sprinkler under low- and intermediate-pressure operation states.
Figure 13

Schematic diagram of the experimental set-up.

Figure 13

Schematic diagram of the experimental set-up.

Close modal
Figure 14

Layout of the collectors.

Figure 14

Layout of the collectors.

Close modal

Calculation method

Loss coefficient of sprinkler pattern radius

The water dispersion devices have different degrees of influence on the sprinkler pattern radius, thus, to facilitate the study of the effect of each fixed water dispersion device on the sprinkler pattern radius, the loss coefficient of the pattern radius was calculated using the following equation (Abo-Ghobar 1992):
(1)
where μ is the percentage of the pattern radius loss, Ri is the measured value of the pattern radius under the ith water dispersion device and the lower working pressures(m), and R0 is the measured value of the pattern radius under the ith water dispersion device and the higher working pressures (m). In general, the larger the μ value, the larger the pattern radius loss.

Average sprinkler water application rate

The average sprinkler water application rate (Liu et al. 2021) refers to the average value of the water application rate at each point within the control area. If each point represents the same area, the average sprinkler water application rate can be expressed as follows:
(2)
where is the average water application rate (mm/h), n is the number of points in the same area, and pi is the water application rate of a point (mm/h). Since the inlet area of the collectors used in this experiment was the same, Equation (2) can be used to calculate the average sprinkler water application rate, which can characterize the radial water distribution of the sprinklers at different radial positions.

Combined uniformity of sprinkler irrigation

The equation for calculating the combined uniformity of sprinkler irrigation proposed by Christiansen (Christiansen 1942) was used to measure the combined uniformity of sprinklers with different fixed water dispersion devices and impact sprinklers. The equation is expressed as follows:
(3)
where CU is the combined uniformity coefficient for sprinkler irrigation, hi is the water depth in the ith collector (mm), is the average depth of the water collected by all collectors, and n is the total number of collectors.

The advantage of utilizing the combined uniformity of sprinkler irrigation in the experiments is that the amount of calculations is of small-scale and only requires the input of the measurement results into Equation (3). However, due to the limitations related to the sprinkler's working pressure, wind speed, and topography, the reproducibility of the experimental data becomes demanding, and the results of the CU value can be diverse. To address the above-mentioned restrictions, the cubic spline interpolation model (Liu et al. 2021) was employed to simulate the water overlap of the sprinklers in the square combination arrangement. The conversion method between radial water volume and grid nodes refers to the method reported by Zhu et al. (2015).

Improved ability of combined uniformity

To facilitate the study of the improved performance of different novel sprinklers on combined uniformity, we have adopted the research approach of Biran et al. (1981). Specifically, the following equation was created. The combined uniformity of the same novel sprinkler under different combination spacings is calculated, and then the combined uniformity of the original sprinkler at different combination spacings are used as a baseline to calculate the average uniformity of the new sprinkler at all combination spacings.
(4)
where K denotes the average coefficient of the ability of the different sprinklers to improve the combined uniformity; the larger the K value, the better the effect of improving the combined uniformity, and vice versa; i denotes the ith sprinkler, j denotes the jth combined spacing, n denotes the number of combined spacing, CUji denotes the combined uniformity of the ith sprinkler under the jth combined spacing, and CUj0 denotes the combined uniformity of the original sprinkler under the jth combined spacing.

Effect of different water dispersion devices on the spread angle of the jet-flow

In general, the larger the jet diffusion angle, the greater the degree of jet fragmentation (Vander Griend et al. 1990). Therefore, in this section, the jet diffusion angle is analyzed to reflect the jet fragmentation characteristics. Figure 15 shows the spread angle of the jet-flow produced by different water dispersion devices. The jet diffusion angles increased gradually with the increase of the working pressure with and without the water dispersion device, and the degree of jet atomization increased with the increase of the jet diffusion angle. This observation is consistent with the research results reported by Jiang on jets generated by special-shaped nozzles (Jiang et al. 2019b). Under the same working pressure, the effect of the different water dispersion devices on the jet diffusion angle was different. Under the working pressure of 100 kPa, the order of the water dispersion devices arranged based on the jet diffusion angle from small to large was B, C, swingarm, A, and no dispersion device. Under the working pressure of 150 kPa, the order of the water dispersion devices arranged based on the jet diffusion angle from small to large was B, C, A, swingarm, and no dispersion device. The sequence at the working pressure of 200 kPa was B, A, C, swingarm, and no dispersion device. Based on the order of the water dispersion devices under different working pressures, it can be found that the jet diffusion angle of the water dispersion device B was always the largest, and that when no dispersion device was used, it was the smallest. The ranking of the water dispersion device A among several water dispersion devices based on the jet diffusion angle gradually increased with the increase of the working pressure, while that of the swingarm decreased progressively with increasing working pressure. This indicates that the water dispersion device B is more suitable for working under low pressure, and water dispersion device A is more suitable for working under medium pressure. With the increase of the working pressure, the ability of the swingarm to crush water flow gradually weakens compared with that of the other water dispersion devices.
Figure 15

Spread angle of jet-flow under different water dispersion devices: (a) 100 kPa; (b) 150 kPa; and (c) 200 kPa (i: no water dispersion device, ii: swingarm water dispersion device, iii: water dispersion device A, iv: water dispersion device B, v: water dispersion device C).

Figure 15

Spread angle of jet-flow under different water dispersion devices: (a) 100 kPa; (b) 150 kPa; and (c) 200 kPa (i: no water dispersion device, ii: swingarm water dispersion device, iii: water dispersion device A, iv: water dispersion device B, v: water dispersion device C).

Close modal

Effect of different sprinklers on sprinkler pattern radius

Table 2 shows the sprinkler pattern radii of different sprinklers under different working pressures. Table 3 shows the loss percentage of the pattern radius of different sprinklers after the working pressure has been reduced.

Table 2

The pattern radius of different sprinklers and different working pressures

TypePressure (kPa)
100150200
9.5 11.2 12.3 
10.0 12.0 13.0 
10.9 13.1 13.8 
A0 12.0 13.3 14.5 
TypePressure (kPa)
100150200
9.5 11.2 12.3 
10.0 12.0 13.0 
10.9 13.1 13.8 
A0 12.0 13.3 14.5 
Table 3

Percentage of pattern radius loss after working pressure is reduced

TypePercentage of pattern radius loss (100%)
Reduced from 150 to 100 kPaReduced from 200 to 150 kPa
15.18 8.94 
16.67 7.69 
16.79 5.07 
A0 9.77 8.28 
TypePercentage of pattern radius loss (100%)
Reduced from 150 to 100 kPaReduced from 200 to 150 kPa
15.18 8.94 
16.67 7.69 
16.79 5.07 
A0 9.77 8.28 

A0: original impact sprinkler; A: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A; B: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B; C: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C.

According to Table 2, the sprinkler pattern radius of the automatic rotating sprinklers and the original impact sprinklers with different water dispersion devices increased gradually with increasing working pressure. When the working pressure was 200 kPa, the pattern radii reached the maximum value. The sprinkler pattern radius of the original impact sprinkler was the farthest under the same working pressure. This is attributed to that, when the liquid column is not affected by the swingarm, it behaves like a free jet, and it is affected only by the air resistance, air entrainment, and gravity. The automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device C had the second-farthest pattern radius under the same working pressure, which is because the jet is not only affected by the above parameters, but also by the circular inner hole and the outer wall of the RSWDD. The automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device B had a shorter range than that with the water dispersion device C under the same working pressure. The reason is that the shape of the cross-section of the inner hole of the water dispersion device C was similar to that of the jet and had little effect on the jet column. On the other hand, the cross-section of the inner hole of the water dispersion device B was square, which is quite different from the shape of the jet liquid column and had a more significant impact on the jet surface. The automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device A had the smallest range under the same working pressure since the NSWDD destroyed the core area of the jet.

According to Table 3, when the working pressure was reduced from 200 to 150 kPa, the pattern radii of the original impact sprinkler and the automatic rotating sprinklers were reduced to varying degrees. The pattern radius of the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device A was reduced the most, reaching 8.94%. Then, the reduction degree of the original impact sprinkler reached 8.28%, followed by that of the sprinkler with the water dispersion device B, which was reduced by 7.69%, while that of the sprinkler with the water dispersion device C underwent a minor reduction of 5.07%. When the working pressure was reduced from 150 to 100 kPa, the pattern radius of the original impact sprinkler and automatic rotating sprinklers with water dispersing devices A, B, and C decreased further, i.e., 9.77, 15.18, 16.67, and 16.79%, respectively. This indicates that, when the working pressure is not significantly decreased from intermediate pressure to low pressure, the effect of the RSWDD on the pattern radius is weaker than that of the original impact sprinkler, while that of the NSWDD is stronger than that of the original impact sprinkler. When the low working pressure is further decreased, the effect of the water dispersion devices on the pattern radius is stronger than that of the original impact sprinkler.

Effect of different sprinklers on radial water distribution

Figure 16 depicts the radial water distribution curve of different sprinkler primary nozzles under various working pressures. It can be observed that, under the working pressures of 100, 150, and 200 kPa, the saddle-shaped area of the radial water distribution curve of the automatic rotating sprinkler equipped with the water dispersion device B was the narrowest, followed by that of the automatic rotating sprinkler equipped with the water dispersion device C, while that of the original impact sprinkler exhibited the most extensive distribution range. With the increased working pressure, the saddle-shaped area of the radial water distribution curve of the automatic rotating sprinkler equipped with the water dispersion devices B and C and the original impact sprinkler gradually disappeared. However, when the working pressure was 200 kPa, the saddle-shaped area of the radial water distribution curve of the automatic rotating sprinkler equipped with the water dispersion device B disappeared, while a specific saddle-shaped area remained in the water distribution curve of the original impact sprinkler and the automatic rotating sprinkler equipped with the water dispersion device C. This suggests that the RSWDD helps to alleviate the saddle-shaped area in the radial water distribution curve. In particular, the effect of the RSWDD with a square inner hole in relieving the saddle-shaped area of the water distribution curve is more pronounced.
Figure 16

Radial water distribution pattern under different water dispersion devices: (a) 100 kPa; (b) 150 kPa; and (c) 200 kPa (A0: original impact sprinkler, A: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A, B: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B, C: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C).

Figure 16

Radial water distribution pattern under different water dispersion devices: (a) 100 kPa; (b) 150 kPa; and (c) 200 kPa (A0: original impact sprinkler, A: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A, B: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B, C: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C).

Close modal

In addition, the radial water distribution curve of the automatic rotating sprinkler equipped with the water dispersion device A exhibited a valley peak shape, and the peak value gradually decreased with increasing working pressure. The peak is mainly attributed to the incomplete breakage of the jet by the NSWDD, which causes the water distribution to be concentrated at the end of the pattern radius, thereby promoting a higher water application rate.

Effect of different sprinklers on water distribution overlap

Figure 17 depicts the water distribution diagram for square combination sprinkler irrigation with various sprinklers at operating pressures of 100, 150, and 200 kPa with 1.2 R combined spacing, where R represents the sprinkler pattern radius. It can be observed that the water application rate at the center of the square increased steadily with decreasing working pressure. The maximum water application rate of the original impact sprinkler and the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device A surpassed 20 mm/h when the working pressure was reduced to 100 kPa. According to the ‘Technical code for sprinkler engineering’, the soil's highest permissible water application rate should not exceed 20 mm/h. Hence, these two types of sprinklers are not recommended for low-pressure sprinkler irrigation. The maximum water application rates of the automatic rotating sprinklers with the water dispersion devices B and C were 14 and 16 mm/h, respectively, meeting the criteria of the above standard. The automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device C had a lower water application rate of 3.6 mm/h in some parts of the spray field, likely resulting in inconsistent sprinkler watering. Although the water application rate in some parts of the spray field irrigated by the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device B was lower than 3.6 mm/h, the distribution range was substantially narrower than that of the other sprinklers. Consequently, the automatic rotating sprinkler with water dispersion device B has no adverse effect on the quality of sprinkler irrigation. Therefore, it can be concluded that, among these sprinklers, the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device B was the best sprinkler under low-pressure conditions.
Figure 17

The influence of different sprinklers on the overlapping water distribution under the square layout: (a) the original impact sprinkler; (b) the automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A; (c) the automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B; (d) the automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C.

Figure 17

The influence of different sprinklers on the overlapping water distribution under the square layout: (a) the original impact sprinkler; (b) the automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A; (c) the automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B; (d) the automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C.

Close modal

Effect of different sprinklers on combined uniformity

Combined uniformity is a crucial index used to evaluate the hydraulic performance of sprinklers. Table 4 lists the combined uniformity of the square layout of the sprinklers equipped with different water dispersion devices at different combination spacings. It can be observed that, under the same working pressure and combined spacing, the CU of the automatic rotating sprinkler was higher than that of the original impact sprinkler, mainly because the jet of the automatic rotating sprinkler was broken under the action of the water dispersion device. Nevertheless, the original impact sprinkler only breaks the jet when the swingarm acts on it. Under the same working pressure and combined spacing, the sprinklers arranged according to the CU from high to low were the automatic rotating sprinklers with water dispersion devices B, C, A, and the original impact sprinkler. This phenomenon is mainly related to the jet fragmentation degree caused by the geometric structure of the water dispersion device. By comparing the CU of the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersing device B under a working pressure of 100 kPa and that of the original impact sprinkler under a working pressure of 200 kPa, it can be found that the maximum CU of the former under a combined spacing of 1.2 R was 81.16%, while that of the latter under a combined spacing of 1.0 R was 74.51%. This indicates that the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device B can significantly improve sprinkler irrigation uniformity and maximize economic benefits under low-pressure conditions.

Table 4

Combined uniformity for different types of fixed devices and spacing

Working pressure (kPa)TypeCU (100%)
1.0 R1.1 R1.2 R1.3 R1.4 R
100 A0 64.00 48.82 46.85 50.73 39.67 
70.00 64.11 66.24 58.69 52.90 
77.97 79.29 81.16 74.12 67.79 
67.88 66.37 75.81 73.52 60.68 
150 A0 68.85 60.93 62.26 64.24 49.36 
71.03 67.37 67.80 59.14 54.20 
82.04 83.51 84.95 79.04 72.16 
72.40 65.18 67.24 74.61 66.38 
200 A0 74.51 71.56 72.95 63.83 56.64 
75.09 69.15 73.24 66.28 60.80 
83.60 83.06 84.95 83.98 77.11 
77.20 79.12 82.51 78.10 67.99 
Working pressure (kPa)TypeCU (100%)
1.0 R1.1 R1.2 R1.3 R1.4 R
100 A0 64.00 48.82 46.85 50.73 39.67 
70.00 64.11 66.24 58.69 52.90 
77.97 79.29 81.16 74.12 67.79 
67.88 66.37 75.81 73.52 60.68 
150 A0 68.85 60.93 62.26 64.24 49.36 
71.03 67.37 67.80 59.14 54.20 
82.04 83.51 84.95 79.04 72.16 
72.40 65.18 67.24 74.61 66.38 
200 A0 74.51 71.56 72.95 63.83 56.64 
75.09 69.15 73.24 66.28 60.80 
83.60 83.06 84.95 83.98 77.11 
77.20 79.12 82.51 78.10 67.99 

Note: A0: original impact sprinkler; A: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device A; B: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device B; C: automatic rotating sprinkler with a water dispersion device C.

Evaluation of different sprinklers for improving combined uniformity

Figure 18 depicts the average improvement effect of automatic rotating sprinklers relative to the combined uniformity of the original impact sprinkler. It can be seen that, when the operating pressure was 100 kPa, the combined uniformity of the automatic rotating sprinklers equipped with the water dispersion devices A, B, and C was enhanced by 26.22, 54.89, and 40.34%, respectively, compared to that of the original impact sprinkler. When the working pressure was 150 kPa, the fixed water dispersion devices A, B, and C could increase the combined uniformity by 4.90, 32.38, and 14.15%, respectively, compared to that of the original impact sprinkler. When the working pressure was 200 kPa, the automatic rotating sprinklers with water dispersion devices A, B, and C increased the combined uniformity by 1.80, 22.49, and 13.93%, respectively, compared to that of the original impact sprinkler. The values of the increasing combined uniformity under different working pressures can indicate that the lower the working pressure, the higher the improvement effect of the automatic rotating sprinklers with different water dispersion devices on combined uniformity. This conclusion is consistent with the research results of Issaka et al. (2018). Under the same working pressure, the automatic rotating sprinklers with different dispersion devices can be arranged according to their improvement effect on combined uniformity from high to low: automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device B, C, and A. This reveals that the RSWDD has a more significant effect on improving the combined uniformity than the NSWDD. Moreover, the RSWDD with the inner hole with the square cross-section has a more significant effect on improving the combined uniformity than that with the circular cross-section.
Figure 18

The combined uniformity improvement capacity of different automatic rotating sprinklers (A: automatic rotating sprinkler with water dispersion device A, B: automatic rotating sprinkler with water dispersion device B, C: automatic rotating sprinkler with water dispersion device C).

Figure 18

The combined uniformity improvement capacity of different automatic rotating sprinklers (A: automatic rotating sprinkler with water dispersion device A, B: automatic rotating sprinkler with water dispersion device B, C: automatic rotating sprinkler with water dispersion device C).

Close modal

This paper compares and analyzes of the jet fragmentation characteristics and hydraulic performance of automatic rotating sprinklers and a prototype impact sprinkler. The study finds that different types of water dispersion devices can cause variations in the jet diffusion angle under low pressure. Among them, water dispersion device B causes the largest jet diffusion angle, resulting in significant jet fragmentation and a large number of water droplets uniformly spraying onto crops and the ground, ultimately improving the combination uniformity of the sprinkler. For instance, the combination uniformity of the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device B can reach 81.16% at a working pressure of 100 kPa, which is 6.65% higher than the combination uniformity of the prototype impact sprinkler at a working pressure of 200 kPa. This phenomenon implies that water dispersion devices with square inner holes can enhance the spray uniformity of sprinklers while saving energy, which is significant. However, due to the unique structure of the water dispersion device, it can only be installed on complete fluidic sprinklers rather than on impact sprinklers because they have a swingarm structure. Therefore, further improvement of the structure of the existing water dispersion device B is necessary.

In addition, this study proposes a new type of automatic rotating sprinkler suitable for low working pressure conditions. Due to the existence of an automatic control component in this automatic rotating sprinkler, the rotational speed can be freely controlled by the component without being affected by the working pressure, making it more suitable for low-pressure intelligent irrigation systems. However, the current power supply for the automatic rotating sprinkler is a battery, which can only work for about 6 h and cannot provide a stable power source for a long time. Therefore, the power system of automatic rotating sprinklers is also an urgent issue that needs to be addressed.

  • The jet diffusion angle of the water dispersion device increases with the increase in the working pressure, but the jet diffusion angle under the influence of the water dispersion device B with a square inner hole is the largest among all water dispersion devices (when the working pressure increases from 100 to 200 kPa, the jet diffusion angle increases from 69.32° to 91°), resulting in the optimal water distribution and combination uniformity of this type of sprinkler. This result indicates that a larger jet diffusion angle can help improve the hydraulic performance of the sprinkler.

  • Under the square combination irrigation with a combination spacing of 1.2 R, the irrigation depth of the automatic rotating sprinkler with the water dispersion device B increased from 3.6 to 13 mm/h as the working pressure increased from 100 to 200 kPa, and this irrigation depth was optimal among all tested sprinklers. This finding suggests that a well-designed water dispersion device can significantly enhance the combined irrigation performance of sprinklers while achieving energy efficiency, and can also prevent excessive or insufficient irrigation in the sprayed area.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51939005), Jiangsu Province and Education Ministry Co-sponsored Synergistic Innovation Center of Modern Agricultural Equipment (XTCX2018), Changzhou Key Research and Development Program (No. CE20222024) and the Youth Talent Development Program of Jiangsu University.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

15886-3, ISO
.
2016
Agricultural Irrigation Equipment – Sprinklers – Part 3: Characterization of Distribution and Test Methods
.
ISO
,
Geneva
,
Switzerland
.
Boden
G.
,
Ruiz
J.
,
Kim
C. J.
&
Chen
X.
1996
Effects of prolonged glucose infusion on insulin secretion, clearance, and action in normal subjects
.
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology And Metabolism
270
(
2
),
E251
E258
.
Chen
C.
,
Yuan
S.
,
Li
H.
&
Wang
C.
2011
Effect of non-circle nozzle on hydraulic performance of impact variable-rate sprinkler
.
Nongye Jixie Xuebao=Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery
42
(
12
),
111
115
.
Chen
L.
,
Gao
D.
,
Cheng
M.
,
Cai
Y.
&
Guo
L.
2022
Effect of special-shaped nozzle structure on water jet performance
.
Processes
10
(
10
),
2066
.
Christiansen
J. E.
1942
Hydraulics of sprinkling systems for irrigation
.
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers
107
(
1
),
221
239
.
Gilley
J. R.
&
Watts
D. G.
1977
Possible energy savings in irrigation
.
Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division
103
(
4
),
445
457
.
Hua
L.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Li
H.
&
Zhou
X.
2018
Hydraulic performance of low pressure sprinkler with special-shaped nozzles
.
Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering
36
(
11
),
1109
1114
.
Hua
L.
,
Li
H.
&
Jiang
Y.
2019
Numerical simulation on the asymmetric irrigation sprinkler jets with LES method
. In:
2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting
.
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
, p.
1
.
Issaka
Z.
,
Li
H.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Tang
P.
,
Chao
C.
&
Darko
R. O.
2018
Hydraulic performance characteristics of impact sprinkler with a fixed water dispersion device
.
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
11
(
6
),
104
112
.
Issaka
Z.
,
Li
H.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Tang
P.
,
Chen
C.
&
Fordjour
A.
2020
Comparative evaluation on performance characteristics of an impact sprinkler with nozzle-dispersion devices and rotary plate sprinkler
.
Applied Engineering in Agriculture
36
(
3
),
321
329
.
Jiang
Y.
,
Issaka
Z.
,
Li
H.
,
Tang
P.
&
Chen
C.
2019a
Range formula based on angle of dispersion and nozzle configuration from an impact sprinkler
.
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
12
(
5
),
97
105
.
Jiang
Y.
,
Xiang
Q.
,
Li
H.
&
Xu
Z.
2020b
Flow characteristics and hydraulic performance of a Gun-Type impact sprinkler with and without aeration
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
146
(
7
),
04020016
.
Johar
R.
,
Bensenouci
A.
&
Bensenouci
M.-A.
2018
IoT based smart sprinkling system
. In:
Paper Presented at the 2018 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T)
.
Li
H.
,
Issaka
Z.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Tang
P.
&
Chen
C.
2019
Influence of a fixed water dispersion device on jet dispersion and range from an impact sprinkler
.
Irrigation and Drainage
68
(
4
),
669
678
.
Lin
K.-C.
,
Kastengren
A.
&
Carter
C. D.
2020
Exploration of two-phase flow structures in an aluminum nozzle of an aerated-liquid injector using X-ray fluorescence techniques
. In
AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum
. p.
0355
.
Liu
J.
,
Gull
U.
,
Putnam
D. H.
&
Kisekka
I.
2021
Variable-rate irrigation uniformity model for linear-move sprinkler systems
.
Transactions of the ASABE
64
(
4
),
1295
1302
.
Shahrubudin
N.
,
Lee
T. C.
&
Ramlan
R.
2019
An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications
.
Procedia Manufacturing
35
,
1286
1296
.
Sharma
P.
&
Fang
T.
2014
Breakup of liquid jets from non-circular orifices
.
Experiments in Fluids
55
(
2
),
1
17
.
Standard, ASAE
.
2001
Procedure for sprinkler testing and performance reporting
.
ASAE, Standard S
398
,
880
882
.
Vander Griend
L.
,
Feldman
M. E.
&
Peterson
C. L.
1990
Modeling combustion of alternate fuels in ADI diesel engine using Kiva
.
Transactions of the ASAE
33
(
2
),
342
0350
.
Wang
F.
&
Fang
T.
2015
Liquid jet breakup for non-circular orifices under low pressures
.
International Journal of Multiphase Flow
72
,
248
262
.
Wang
X. F.
,
Chin
J. S.
&
Lefebvre
A. H.
1989
Influence of gas-injector geometry on atomization performance of aerated-liquid nozzles
.
International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines
6
(
3–4
),
271
280
.
Wei
W.
,
Deng
J.
&
Liu
B.
2013
Influence of aeration and initial water thickness on axial velocity attenuation of jet flows
.
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
14
(
5
),
362
370
.
Xiang
Q.
,
Qureshi
W. A.
,
Tunio
M. H.
,
Solangi
K. A.
,
Xu
Z.
&
Lakhiar
I. A.
2021
Low-pressure drop size distribution characterization of impact sprinkler jet nozzles with and without aeration
.
Agricultural Water Management
243
,
106458
.
Xu
M.
,
Li
H.
,
Chen
C.
,
Tu
Q.
&
Liu
J. P.
2012
Effect of sprinkler structure on water distribution uniformity
. In
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
. (Vol.
15
, No.
5
, p.
052028
).
IOP Publishing
.
Yuan
S.
,
Wei
Y.
,
Li
H.
&
Xiang
Q.
2010
Structure design and experiments on the water distribution of the variable-rate sprinkler with non-circle nozzle
.
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
26
(
9
),
149
153
.
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Li
H.
&
Jiang
Y.
2017
Study on water distribution uniformity of non-circular nozzles at low pressure
.
Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering
35
(
5
),
448
453
.
Zhu
X.
,
Yuan
S.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Liu
J.
&
Liu
X.
2015
Comparison of fluidic and impact sprinklers based on hydraulic performance
.
Irrigation Science
33
(
5
),
367
374
.
doi:10.1007/s00271-015-0472-6
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).