Drought is the most important factor limiting the growth and production of wheat in China. Arid and semi-arid regions and high water consumption in the agricultural sector have led to various deficit irrigation strategies. The effect of the hydrological process on yield production has been evaluated in rainfed cultivation of wheat for the three climatic stations of Gansu Province, Yellow River Valley, China. A general framework was provided for rainfed cultivation of wheat in arid and semi-arid regions. Moreover, the best time and amount of complementary irrigation and its effect on increasing yield production have been evaluated using grey wolf optimization algorithm. The results showed that rainfed cultivation of wheat in a humid regime could be suggested without complementary irrigation. Conducting two complementary irrigations in semi-humid regime can increase the final yield of wheat by more than 150 kg/ha. The maximum yields in sustainable management were obtained 4,844, 4,510, and 4,408 kg/ha for Longnan, Tianshui, and Dingxi, respectively.

  • This paper focuses on the modeling of the soil, water, and crop system with more details to improve the applicability.

  • The proposed method is an optimal policy by applying rainfed management and complementary irrigation.

Dryland agriculture under rainfed conditions is found mainly in Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America (Ahmadi et al. 2015; Lalehzari et al. 2016). Liu et al. (2021) reported that wheat production was affected by drought stress between flowering and seed filling. However, the use of deficit irrigation or rainfed irrigation can be considered as one of the sustainable solutions by applying one or more complementary irrigations (Stricevic et al. 2011; Nasiri et al. 2017). The rainfed cultivation of this crop is done after harvesting rice or alternating with other crops such as rapeseed, soybeans, or cereals. Assessment of supplemental irrigation and effective rainfall in rainfed cultivation should be considered for determining an optimal decision system. Hence, it is necessary to find the appropriate time and amount of water to achieve maximum water productivity (Wang et al. 2021). The basic principle of efficient water use for rainfed crops lies in optimizing each of the time and amount of the complementary irrigation.

Estimating the biomass, canopy cover, and water productivity was carried out using crop growth simulation in the past decades (Arvaneh et al. 2011; Zeleke et al. 2011; Kumar et al. 2015; Mousavizadeh et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2017; Lalehzari et al. 2020). The simulation model needs to be linked with an optimization algorithm to achieve an efficient solution by the predetermined feasible domain based on the objective function (Varade & Patel 2018; Varzi et al. 2019).

Different climatic conditions in China require the development and evaluation of different decision-making strategies appropriate for each region to improve production, reduce water consumption, and make optimal use of rainfall (Li et al. 2021, 2022; Yin et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2023). Due to the impact of climate variation on water consumption, production, and water use efficiency, the yield production models have been calibrated by three field datasets including the regions of Longnan (semi-humid), Tianshui (semi-arid), and Dingxi (dry) in Gansu area, China. The accuracy and stability of sustainable planning in agricultural water management is essential to its success in field experiments. This study attempts to deal with the gaps in previous studies by (1) developing an integrated framework to accurately estimate the crop growth simulation and (2) providing an optimal plan for irrigation of wheat in arid and semi-arid regions. Therefore, we focus on the modeling of the soil, water, and crop system with more details to improve the applicability of the developed models. The effects of soil moisture, precipitation, crop growth curve, variable irrigation intervals, and the time and depth of irrigation were incorporated to find complementary irrigation plans.

Complementary irrigation

In this section, the process of simulating and optimizing continuous programming is developed to achieve sustainable planning and then determining the time and amount of complementary irrigations in wheat cultivation. The proposed framework is divided into three sections: (1) field and climate data collection and analysis, (2) development of the growth simulation model, and (3) find the optimal solution using grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm.

The time and depth values of irrigation water in rainfed cultivation are determined using the process presented in Figure 1. According to the developed mechanism presented in the figure, DL: minimum values of feasible domain (mm/day); HL: maximum values of feasible domain (mm/day); PEF: effective rainfall (mm/day); AW: allocated water (mm/day); Y: the maximum yield calculated for irrigation r (kg/ha); MaxY: a temporal matrix for soring Y; Tl: the best time of complementary irrigation (days from sowing); Cl: the optimal depth of complementary irrigation (mm); Tr: transpiration (mm/day); WP*: normalized water productivity (kg/ha); HI: harvest index (%); B: biomass (kg/ha); Nr: number of complementary irrigation; Ni: number of time steps in the growing season (day); Nf: number of study areas; and D: a checkpoint to control the iterations.
Figure 1

Assessment of the time and amount values of complementary irrigations (DL: minimum values of feasible domain (mm/day), HL: maximum values of feasible domain (mm/day), PEF: effective rainfall (mm/day), AW: allocated water (mm/day), Y: the maximum yield calculated for irrigation r (kg/ha), MaxY: a temporal matrix for soring Y, Tl: the best time of complementary irrigation (days from sowing); Cl: the optimal depth of complementary irrigation (mm), Tr: transpiration (mm/day), WP*: normalized water productivity (kg/ha), HI: harvest index (%), B: biomass (kg/ha), Nr: number of complementary irrigation, Ni: number of time steps in the growing season (day), Nf: number of study areas, and D: a checkpoint to control the iterations).

Figure 1

Assessment of the time and amount values of complementary irrigations (DL: minimum values of feasible domain (mm/day), HL: maximum values of feasible domain (mm/day), PEF: effective rainfall (mm/day), AW: allocated water (mm/day), Y: the maximum yield calculated for irrigation r (kg/ha), MaxY: a temporal matrix for soring Y, Tl: the best time of complementary irrigation (days from sowing); Cl: the optimal depth of complementary irrigation (mm), Tr: transpiration (mm/day), WP*: normalized water productivity (kg/ha), HI: harvest index (%), B: biomass (kg/ha), Nr: number of complementary irrigation, Ni: number of time steps in the growing season (day), Nf: number of study areas, and D: a checkpoint to control the iterations).

Close modal

Soil erosion index

Predicting the real-time soil water content in the soil surface layer and quantifying the land use cover is important to minimize the soil erodibility in rainfed cultivation that rainfall is a key component of sustainable planning. Research has shown that in the conditions of rainfed cultivation, the land cover varies between 4 and 90%, and the soil moisture in the surface layer should be between the field capacity and the point of air entering the soil in order to prevent soil erosion (Liu et al. 2020; Ma et al. 2023). Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the soil moisture content daily using a volume balance during the growth period. Transpiration and evaporation, in addition to climatic conditions, depend on the moisture content of different layers of the soil. Transpiration, evaporation, deep percolation, and runoff are the components of the water budget that determine the water use efficiency in each planning policy. The main form of soil water balance is formulated as Equation (1):
formula
(1)
where S is the height of stored water in the root zone (mm); I is the irrigation depth (mm); R is rainfall (mm); E is evaporation (mm); DP is deep percolation (mm), and RO is runoff (mm). The water balance was calculated and measured in the root zone. The root depth starts to increase from an initial depth ZMin to the maximum effective rooting depth ZMax is reached and estimated in daily time steps as the following equation (Raes et al. 2012):
formula
(2)
where Zt is the root depth (m) at the time from sowing t (day); ZMin and ZMax are the initial and maximum root depths (m), respectively; t0 is time to reach 90% crop emergence (day); tMax is time after planting when ZMax is reached (day), and n is shape factor.
According to Equation (8), irrigation time can be estimated according to the time interval of rainfall and irrigation and the soil moisture content in the field capacity and permanent wilting point. Hence, in addition to studying the interaction of groundwater and irrigation, it is necessary to simulate the movement of water in the root area. The estimation of the evaporation, deep percolation, and runoff, which are generally considered as part of the system losses must be done in real-time. Evaporation occurs from the surface layer of the soil, and each soil texture has a different surface layer to provide evaporation conditions. On the other hand, different moisture content has different evaporation rates. Deep percolation will occur between two points of soil moisture (saturation and field capacity) and will only be considered from the underlying soil and for the outflow of water from the root zone. Runoff has been estimated according to the irrigation system and permeability of the soil. According to the description, the water allocated to each irrigation event should be less than the soil capacity in the irrigation time:
formula
(3)
where TAW is the capacity to store water in the root zone.
The simulation results were compared with the actual soil moisture by the error indicators. The error statistics of calibration process were evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index (NSE) (Nash & Sutcliffe 1970), mean absolute error (MAE), and the normalized objective function (NOF) (Pennell et al. 1990) for the simulated and observed yield production values. The measures used in this study were obtained using the following equations:
formula
(4)
formula
(5)
formula
(6)
where Oi is the observed value of an event i, Pi is the predicted value of an event i, is the average observed value, and n is the number of observed values. The minimum value of RMSE is zero, with a better agreement close to 0. Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index (NSE) varied between 1 for the best agreement to negative values.

Water tension optimization

The optimization model was defined to minimize the difference between the soil moisture required by the plant (evaporation from the surface layer of the soil + transpiration) and the water available in the root zone. Therefore, the objective function was defined according to the soil water balance equation as follows:
formula
(7)
where OF is the objective function (mm) and SM is soil moisture in root zone (mm).

The constraints applied to the problem include a set of subroutines that prevent moisture and saturated soil stress. Furthermore, according to the growth stage of the plant, it divides the moisture stress in the entire growing season in water shortage conditions. These tensions are controlled at each time step, which is daily, and have been included in the feasible domain of the objective function.

GWO inspired by the grey wolves organization to hunt in the wild (Mirjalili et al. 2014) was used to find the optimal times and depths of complementary irrigation. The main principle in the GWO algorithm is searching, encircling, hunting, and attacking the prey (Tikhamarine et al. 2020). The developed equation for modeling the encircling process is as follows:
formula
(8)
formula
(9)
where t is the number of iterations, is the hunting position vector, A and C are the coefficient vectors, and X is the position of a grey wolf. A and C are calculated as follows:
formula
(10)
formula
(11)
where r1 and r2 are random parameters in the range [0 1] and a is linearly reduced from 2 to 0 during an iteration. The hunting process is usually led by the alpha wolf and in some cases by the beta and delta wolves. To simulate the mathematical formulation of grey wolf hunting, it is assumed that alpha or the best available solution, beta, and delta, have a better knowledge of the potential location of prey. Therefore, three optimal solutions are stored and other wolves are forced to update their positions according to the best location, so mathematically it is:
formula
(12)

The prey encircling and attacking are repeated until an optimum solution is obtained or it reaches the maximum number of iterations (Tikhamarine et al. 2020). As mentioned above, the grey wolves finish the hunt by attacking the prey when it stops moving. To mathematically model approaching the prey, we decrease the value of . Note that the fluctuation range of is also decreased by . In other words, is a random value in the interval [−a, a], where a is decreased from 2 to 0 throughout iterations. When random values of are in [−1, 1], the next position of a search agent can be in any position between its current position and the position of the prey. GWO has been widely used in different studies to search optimal solution in a predetermined feasible domain in recent years (Arora et al. 2019; Dehghani et al. 2019; Maroufpoor et al. 2019; Dhargupta et al. 2020; Tikhamarine et al. 2020).

Study areas

The Yellow River Valley with an area of 752,500 km2 and an average height of 4,000 m above sea level has a variety of climates from semi-humid to dry. The Yellow River originates from the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau at Bayan Har Mountain in Qinghai and passes through the provinces of Qinghai, Sichuan, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Shanxi, Shanxi, Henan, and Shandong to the Bohai Sea in Kanuli County, Shandong Province. Three climatic zones have been identified in this range, including the dry zone in the northwest, the semi-humid zone in the southeast, and the semi-arid zone in the middle parts (Li et al. 2020). Average annual rainfall and temperature are between 208 and 748 mm and between 4.4 and 14.2 °C, respectively. The area studied in this research is the southeastern part of Gansu Province, which is influenced by the Yellow River and has a dry to semi-humid climate. Longnan (33.40°N, 104.92°E), Tianshui (34.58°N, 105.72°E), and Dingxi (35.58°N, 104.62°E) were considered to evaluate the rainfed cultivation. The temperature and precipitation data of 326 national ground meteorological stations of China in the Yellow River Valley were collected from the China Meteorological Scientific Data Sharing Service Network (http://cdc.cma.gov.cn) between 2000 and 2022.

Sustainable irrigation planning is prepared with the objective of maximizing crop yield using the GWO method. Hydrological process concept in this study means that the complementary irrigation time and depth values are estimated under the three climate effects in Gansu Province. The arid index (AIU) has been used to determine the climatic regime and select the study areas in the Gansu region (UNEP 1992; Gao et al. 2021; Yue et al. 2021; Pei et al. 2023). This indicator indicates simultaneous changes in rainfall and evapotranspiration, which are defined as follows:
formula
(13)
where P is precipitation (mm) and ETp is potential evapotranspiration (mm). The range of changes for this indicator for different climatic ranges is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Arid index (AIU) classifications for determination of study areas

Climate regimeAIUStudy area
Arid 0.05 ≤ AIU < 0.2 Dingxi 
Semi-arid 0.2 ≤ AIU < 0.5 Tianshui 
Semi-humid 0.5 ≤ AIU < 0.65 Longnan 
Humid 0.65 ≤ AIU – 
Climate regimeAIUStudy area
Arid 0.05 ≤ AIU < 0.2 Dingxi 
Semi-arid 0.2 ≤ AIU < 0.5 Tianshui 
Semi-humid 0.5 ≤ AIU < 0.65 Longnan 
Humid 0.65 ≤ AIU – 
The most important climatic information used as input data is the maximum and minimum daily temperature, potential evapotranspiration, CO2 concentration, and rainfall (Raes et al. 2009). For each study area, a wheat field was selected and soil information, irrigation, canopy cover data, and cultivating dates were collected. Daily evapotranspiration curves and the length of the growing season are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Potential evapotranspiration for different studied climate regimes (mm/day).

Figure 2

Potential evapotranspiration for different studied climate regimes (mm/day).

Close modal

Soil characteristics

The saturated hydraulic conductivity (KSat), the moisture content in the field capacity (θFC), and the moisture at the permanent wilting point (θPWP) determine the water availability in the root zone, which are introduced to the model. The soil characteristics of each of the selected farms are summarized in the four studied farms in Table 2.

Table 2

Soil characteristics in the four experimental farms

Study areaSoil textureField capacityPermanent wilting pointBulk density
Dingxi Silty loam 24.4 10.1 1.43 
Longnan Silty loam 23.8 10.3 1.46 
Tianshui Silty loam 24.1 9.8 1.45 
Study areaSoil textureField capacityPermanent wilting pointBulk density
Dingxi Silty loam 24.4 10.1 1.43 
Longnan Silty loam 23.8 10.3 1.46 
Tianshui Silty loam 24.1 9.8 1.45 

Irrigation strategies

Three irrigation strategies were considered for each field to calibrate the wheat yield simulation model. In full irrigation strategy, irrigation time and depth were measured and summarized in Table 3. To evaluate the effect of deficit irrigation and to find the best points for complementary irrigation, two deficit irrigation events (25% full irrigation) were defined for each sample and its production was recorded. The results of these tests are presented in Table 4. The irrigation depth presented for each scenario (It) were considered equal to I1 = 0.25 × I(D1) and I2 = 0.5 × I(D2) which D1 and D2 are the irrigation numbers indicated in the table. Therefore, 9, 16, and 14 different scenarios were obtained for simulation by the plant growth model for Longnan, Dingxi, and Tianshui, respectively.

Table 3

Existing full irrigation plans in the three experimental farms

Irrigation numberLongnan
Dingxi
Tianshui
TimeIrrigationTimeIrrigationTimeIrrigation
daymmdaymmdaymm
36 42 57 
84 54 63 
88 45 69 15 75 
97 93 13 96 108 96 
112 54 21 75 114 72 
143 69 107 93 122 108 
167 87 113 102 129 96 
178 123 121 99 137 99 
184 132 127 87 145 102 
10 188 138 135 117 153 87 
11 – – 143 114 164 123 
12 – – 151 96 171 111 
13 – – 162 102 195 102 
14 – – 169 111 202 54 
15 – – 177 96 208 69 
16 – – 183 114 213 66 
17 – – 190 126 – – 
18 – – 194 129 – – 
19 – – 199 75 – – 
Total  861  1,797  1,380 
Irrigation numberLongnan
Dingxi
Tianshui
TimeIrrigationTimeIrrigationTimeIrrigation
daymmdaymmdaymm
36 42 57 
84 54 63 
88 45 69 15 75 
97 93 13 96 108 96 
112 54 21 75 114 72 
143 69 107 93 122 108 
167 87 113 102 129 96 
178 123 121 99 137 99 
184 132 127 87 145 102 
10 188 138 135 117 153 87 
11 – – 143 114 164 123 
12 – – 151 96 171 111 
13 – – 162 102 195 102 
14 – – 169 111 202 54 
15 – – 177 96 208 69 
16 – – 183 114 213 66 
17 – – 190 126 – – 
18 – – 194 129 – – 
19 – – 199 75 – – 
Total  861  1,797  1,380 
Table 4

Deficit irrigation scenarios to provide the observed values of biomass for calibration

ScenariosLongnan
Dingxi
Tianshui
D1D2IWYD1D2IWYD1D2IWY
S1 10 722 4,127 17 1,664 4,215 16 1,295 4,799 
S2 777 4,232 11 1,668 4,092 1,257 4,603 
S3 7a 784 4,259 19 1,683 4,279 13 1,273 4,688 
S4 716 4,100 10 1,682 4,196 4a 15 1,280 4,739 
S5 10 735 4,181 7a 14 1,663 4,081 12 10 1,259 4,635 
S6 6a 734 4,157 13 1,672 4,104 15 1,271 4,714 
S7 755 4,202 16 1,675 4,171 7a 14 1,292 4,790 
S8 8a 734 4,112 15 13 1,673 4,125 10 1,265 4,618 
S9     19 1,694 4,255 14a 1,277 4,708 
S10     18a 10 1,645 4,150 16 1,266 4,771 
S11     11 16 1,655 4,047 8a 12 1,247 4,601 
S12     5a 18 554 4,663 1,234 13 414 4,667 
S13     12 15 1,677 4,162 11 1,234 4,585 
S14     8a 17 1,653 4,052     
S15     14a 12 1,670 4,130     
S16   861 4,273   1,797 4,303   1,380 4,804 
ScenariosLongnan
Dingxi
Tianshui
D1D2IWYD1D2IWYD1D2IWY
S1 10 722 4,127 17 1,664 4,215 16 1,295 4,799 
S2 777 4,232 11 1,668 4,092 1,257 4,603 
S3 7a 784 4,259 19 1,683 4,279 13 1,273 4,688 
S4 716 4,100 10 1,682 4,196 4a 15 1,280 4,739 
S5 10 735 4,181 7a 14 1,663 4,081 12 10 1,259 4,635 
S6 6a 734 4,157 13 1,672 4,104 15 1,271 4,714 
S7 755 4,202 16 1,675 4,171 7a 14 1,292 4,790 
S8 8a 734 4,112 15 13 1,673 4,125 10 1,265 4,618 
S9     19 1,694 4,255 14a 1,277 4,708 
S10     18a 10 1,645 4,150 16 1,266 4,771 
S11     11 16 1,655 4,047 8a 12 1,247 4,601 
S12     5a 18 554 4,663 1,234 13 414 4,667 
S13     12 15 1,677 4,162 11 1,234 4,585 
S14     8a 17 1,653 4,052     
S15     14a 12 1,670 4,130     
S16   861 4,273   1,797 4,303   1,380 4,804 

D1 = Irrigation number for the first deficit irrigation (0.25 × I); D2 = Irrigation number for the second deficit irrigation (0.5 × Ii); IW = Irrigation water (mm); Y = Yield (kg/ha).

aThe scenarios used for verification.

Model calibration

Table 5 shows a summary of the error statistics results for the calibration of input parameters. According to the error statistics in the table, the accuracy of the simulation model is confirmed to estimate yield production.

Table 5

Error indicators to evaluate the simulation results

AreaProcessRMSEMAENOFNSE
kgkgkg
Longnan Calibration 33 17 0.012 0.98 
Validation 93 46 0.039 0.94 
Tianshui Calibration 22 0.007 0.99 
Validation 29 13 0.010 0.99 
Dingxi Calibration 21 0.007 0.99 
Validation 18 0.005 0.99 
AreaProcessRMSEMAENOFNSE
kgkgkg
Longnan Calibration 33 17 0.012 0.98 
Validation 93 46 0.039 0.94 
Tianshui Calibration 22 0.007 0.99 
Validation 29 13 0.010 0.99 
Dingxi Calibration 21 0.007 0.99 
Validation 18 0.005 0.99 

Canopy cover

Figure 3 shows the curve of canopy cover at different times of the growing season. According to the figure, the highest fraction of canopy cover in Tianshui farm with 90% coverage and the lowest was in Longnan farm. Tianshui has the longest and Longnan has the shortest growth period. The process of canopy cover changes, especially from the germination stage to full maturity, constitutes the main difference in irrigation planning and biomass production. Dingxi region has a higher water requirement due to the greater coverage area.
Figure 3

Average of canopy cover curves for Longnan, Tianshui, and Dingxi.

Figure 3

Average of canopy cover curves for Longnan, Tianshui, and Dingxi.

Close modal

Transpiration

The most important advantage of the developed crop simulation is the daily determination of transpiration and thus the product's response to environmental stresses. Therefore, the changes in transpiration in the four study range in Figure 4 has been compared. In humid areas such as Longnan, wheat transpiration changes during the growing season without sudden changes and is based on a predictable pattern. In Dingxi and Tianshui, where the air temperature changes in a short period, transpiration fluctuates on a daily and weekly scale. Furthermore, the noticeable temperature difference between the summer and winter seasons in the Dingxi has caused a significant difference in crop transpiration. The irrigation intervals in the Longnan area could be estimated between 5 and 7 days in the two last months of the growing season because the transpiration rate has decreased significantly after each irrigation or rainfall. Therefore, rainfed cultivation in this area should be evaluated with different planning and management.
Figure 4

Transpiration rate in Longnan, Tianshui, and Dingxi regions.

Figure 4

Transpiration rate in Longnan, Tianshui, and Dingxi regions.

Close modal

Complementary irrigation in rainfed cultivation

Rainfed cultivation of winter crops such as wheat is one of the main strategies for irrigation water management in China. The estimation of wheat yield under rainfed cultivation conditions and the effect of complementary irrigation on yield production is a topic that has been studied in three study areas. Figure 5 shows the biomass changes in rainfed conditions and after two complementary irrigations for Dingxi farm. It should be noted that the time and amount of water allocated in complementary irrigation are calculated by the optimization method. Therefore, the values obtained for the time and amount of irrigation are the highest yields obtained from the two complementary irrigations among all the existing scenarios.
Figure 5

The impact of complementary irrigation on biomass in four study regions.

Figure 5

The impact of complementary irrigation on biomass in four study regions.

Close modal

In this structure, two complementary irrigations in Dingxi farm in the amount of 57 and 65 mm are recommended on 154 and 168 days from sowing, respectively. The proposed plan will increase the biomass by about 230 kg/ha, from 2,960 kg/ha in rainfed conditions to 3,190 kg/ha. According to the growth pattern program, this period is the stage of reproductive growth and seed filling, which is the most important and sensitive stage of the water supply of the crop to increase yield.

In the Longnan area, complementary irrigation does not play a significant role in improving the yield throughout the growing season. The growing biomass curve produced by the plant only declines in the last 2 weeks due to a lack of rainfall, which can be compensated by one or two irrigations with a depth of less than 40 mm (Figure 5). The difference between yield production values with and without complementary irrigation is about 150 kg of biomass or 60 kg/ha of the final product. Complementary irrigation in the Tianshui Plain requires more accurate time management and irrigation planning than in other areas. Because the distribution of rainfall over time, the amount of rainfall, and the length of the growing season, provide a wide range of cultivation components. The interval between two complementary irrigations is 63 days from 30 February to 1 May which raises 240 kg/ha of biomass (Figure 5).

Rainfed cultivation with/without complementary irrigation

The runoff in the water balance equation in the experimental field located at the arid region (Dingxi) less than 20 mm/day of rainfall is calculated by 6.7% (Table 6). Rainfed cultivation has reduced wheat yields in Dingxi to less than one-third of the expected economic yield in previous studies (Li et al. 2019). As shown in the table, complementary irrigations can be improved the yield production by more than 100 kg/ha.

Table 6

Comparison of rainfed cultivation with/without two complementary irrigations

RegionWithout complementary irrigation
With two complementary irrigations
PrecipitationYEDPROYIWWP
m3kg%%%kgm3kg/m3
Longnan 5,640 1,080 4.5 2.3 49 1,180 660 1.79 
Dingxi 1,630 630 6.6 2.1 6.7 740 1,220 0.61 
Tianshui 3,720 1,040 4.1 1.5 23.4 1,230 810 1.49 
RegionWithout complementary irrigation
With two complementary irrigations
PrecipitationYEDPROYIWWP
m3kg%%%kgm3kg/m3
Longnan 5,640 1,080 4.5 2.3 49 1,180 660 1.79 
Dingxi 1,630 630 6.6 2.1 6.7 740 1,220 0.61 
Tianshui 3,720 1,040 4.1 1.5 23.4 1,230 810 1.49 

Y, yield; E, evaporation; DP, deep percolation; RO, runoff; IW, irrigation water; WP, water productivity.

Wheat as a priority in the cultivation pattern of different regions of Gansu needs to be considered in irrigation management, especially in rainfed cultivation conditions. Therefore, this study was conducted to simulate the wheat growth model and find the optimal amount and time of complementary irrigations using GWO in four different climatic regions of Gansu. The growth pattern of wheat in different climatic conditions has been evaluated using real-time simulation with daily time steps. The calibration process was carried out based on the collection and analysis of farm information from experimental farms (Dingxi (arid), Tianshui (semi-arid), and Longnan (semi-humid)). The total water demand for wheat cultivation are estimated at 8,350, 6,520, and 5,260 m3/ha for Dingxi, Tianshui, and Longnan, respectively. Moreover, the total transpiration was obtained in Dingxi, Tianshui, and Longnan farms equal to 790, 717, and 407 mm, respectively. A summary of production and evaluation parameters showed that the best area for wheat cultivation in different climatic conditions of Gansu is Tianshui Plain with water productivity of 0.48 kg/m3 and a yield of more than 4,800 kg/ha in a full irrigation plan. Distribution of rainfall and temperature in a long growth period could be completed by the vegetative and reproductive growth of the wheat and could be considered as an economic policy by applying rainfed management and complementary irrigation. Furthermore, rainfed cultivation for the Longnan area and rainfed cultivation with complementary irrigation at the end of the growing season under climate conditions close to Tianshui could be recommended.

This work was supported by the Self-initiated Project of Gansu Agricultural University, grant number GSAU-ZL-2015046.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahmadi
S. H.
,
Mosallaeepour
E.
,
Kamgar-Haghighi
A. K.
&
Sepaskhah
A. R.
2015
Modeling maize yield and soil water content with AquaCrop under full and deficit irrigation management
.
Water Resource Management
29
,
2837
2853
.
Arvaneh
H.
,
Abbasi
F.
&
Eslami
H.
2011
Validation and testing of AquaCrop under farmers management
. In:
1st National Conference on Agrometeorology and Agricultural Water Management
.
Dehghani
M.
,
Riahi-Madvar
H.
,
Hooshyaripor
F.
,
Mosavi
A.
,
Shamshirband
S.
,
Zavadskas
E. K.
&
Chau
K. W.
2019
Prediction of hydropower generation using grey wolf optimization adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
.
Energies
12
(
289
),
1
20
.
Dhargupta
S.
,
Ghosh
M.
,
Mirjalili
S.
&
Sarkar
R.
2020
Selective opposition based grey wolf optimization
.
Expert Systems with Applications
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113389.
Gao
C.
,
Hao
M.
,
Chen
J.
&
Gu
C.
2021
Simulation and design of joint distribution of rainfall and tide level in Wuchengxiyu Region, China
.
Urban Climate
40
,
101005
.
doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101005
.
Kumar
P.
,
Sarangi
A.
,
Singh
D. K.
,
Parihar
S. S.
&
Sahoo
R. N.
2015
Simulation of salt dynamics in the root zone and yield of wheat crop under irrigated saline regimes using SWAP model
.
Agricultural Water Management
148
,
72
83
.
Lalehzari
R.
,
Boroomand-Nasab
S.
,
Moazed
H.
&
Haghighi
A.
2016
Multi-objective management of water allocation to sustainable irrigation planning and optimal cropping pattern
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
142
(
1
),
05015008
.
Lalehzari
R.
,
Boroomand Nasab
S.
,
Moazed
H.
,
Haghighi
A.
&
Yaghoobzadeh
M.
2020
Simulation-optimization modeling for water resources management using NSGAII-OIP and Modflow
.
Irrigation and Drainage
69 (3), 317–332.
doi:10.1002/ird.2424
.
Li
Y.
,
Xie
Z.
,
Qin
Y.
&
Zheng
Z.
2019
Responses of the Yellow River basin vegetation: climate change
.
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
11
(
4
),
483
498
.
Li
J.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Wu
X.
,
Xu
C.
,
Guo
S.
&
Chen
X.
2020
Toward monitoring short-term droughts using a novel daily scale, standardized antecedent precipitation evapotranspiration index
.
Journal of Hydrometeorology
21
(
5
),
891
908
.
doi:10.1175/JHM-D-19-0298.1
.
Li
J.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Wu
X.
,
Zscheischler
J.
,
Guo
S.
&
Chen
X.
2021
A standardized index for assessing sub-monthly compound dry and hot conditions with application in China
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
25
(
3
),
1587
1601
.
doi:10.5194/hess-25-1587-2021
.
Li
Q.
,
Song
D.
,
Yuan
C.
&
Nie
W.
2022
An image recognition method for the deformation area of open-pit rock slopes under variable rainfall
.
Measurement
188
,
110544
.
doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110544
.
Liu
X. J.
,
Yin
B. Z.
,
Hu
Z. H.
,
Bao
X. Y.
,
Wang
Y. D.
&
Zhen
W. C.
2021
Physiological response of flag leaf and yield formation of winter wheat under different spring restrictive irrigation regimes in the Haihe Plain, China
.
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
20
(
9
),
2343
2359
.
Liu
Y.
,
Zhang
K.
,
Li
Z.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Wang
J.
&
Huang
P.
2020
A hybrid runoff generation modelling framework based on spatial combination of three runoff generation schemes for semi-humid and semi-arid watersheds
.
Journal of Hydrology
590
,
125440
.
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125440
.
Liu
Z.
,
Xu
J.
,
Liu
M.
,
Yin
Z.
,
Liu
X.
,
Yin
L.
&
Zheng
W.
2023
Remote sensing and geostatistics in urban water-resource monitoring: a review
.
Marine and Freshwater Research
74, 747–765. doi:10.1071/MF22167
.
Ma
S.
,
Qiu
H.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Yang
D.
,
Tang
B.
,
Wang
D.
&
Cao
M.
2023
Topographic changes, surface deformation and movement process before, during and after a rotational landslide
.
Remote Sensing
15
(
3
), 662.
doi:10.3390/rs15030662
.
Maroufpoor
S.
,
Maroufpoor
E.
,
Bozorg-Haddad
O.
,
Shiri
J.
&
Mundher Yaseen
Z.
2019
Soil moisture simulation using hybrid artificial intelligent model: hybridization of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer algorithm
.
Journal of Hydrology
575, 544–556.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.045
.
Mirjalili
S. A.
,
Mirjalili
S. M.
&
Lewis
A.
2014
Grey wolf optimizer
.
Advances in Engineering Software
69
,
46
61
.
Mousavizadeh
S. F.
,
Honar
T.
&
Ahmadi
S. H.
2016
Assessment of the AquaCrop model for simulating canola under different irrigation management in a semiarid area
.
International Journal of Plant Production
10
(
4
),
1735
6814
.
Nash
J. E.
&
Sutcliffe
J. V.
1970
River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1. A discussion of principles
.
Journal of Hydrology
10
(
3
),
282
292
.
Nasiri
A.
,
Samdaliri
M.
,
Rad
A. S.
,
Shahsavari
N.
,
Kale
A. M.
&
Jabbari
H.
2017
Effect of plant density on yield and physiological characteristics of six canola cultivars
.
Journal of Scientific Agriculture
1
,
249
253
.
Pei
Y.
,
Qiu
H.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Wang
J.
,
Yang
D.
,
Tang
B.
&
Cao
M.
2023
Elevation dependence of landslide activity induced by climate change in the eastern Pamirs
.
Landslides
20, 1115–1133.
doi:10.1007/s10346-023-02030-w
.
Pennell
K. D.
,
Hornsby
A. G.
,
Jessup
R. E.
&
Rao
P. S. C.
1990
Evaluation of five simulation models for predicting aldicarb and bromide behavior under field conditions
.
Water Resources Research
26
(
11
),
2679
2693
.
Raes
D.
,
Steduto
P.
,
Hsiao
T. C.
&
Freres
E.
2012
Reference Manual AquaCrop, FAO, Land and Water Division, Rome Italy
.
Stricevic
R.
,
Cosic
M.
,
Djurovic
N.
,
Pejic
B.
&
Maksimovic
L.
2011
Assessment of the FAO AquaCrop model in the simulation of rainfed and complementary irrigated maize sugar beet and sunflower
.
Agricultural Water Management
98
,
1615
1621
.
Sun
Q.
,
Xu
G.
,
Ma
C.
&
Chen
L.
2017
Optimal crop-planting area considering the agricultural drought degree
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
143
(
12
),
04017050
.
Tikhamarine
Y.
,
Souag-Gamane
D.
,
Najah Ahmed
A.
,
Kisi
O.
&
El-Shafie
A.
2020
Improving artificial intelligence models accuracy for monthly streamflow forecasting using grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm
.
Journal of Hydrology
582, 124435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124435
.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
1992
World Atlas of Desertification
.
Varade
S.
&
Patel
J. N.
2018
Determination of optimum cropping pattern using advanced optimization algorithms
.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
23
(
6
),
05018010
.
Varzi
M.
,
Trout
T. J.
,
DeJonge
K. C.
&
Oad
R.
2019
Optimal water allocation under deficit irrigation in the context of Colorado water law
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
145
(
5
),
0015634
.
Wang
C.
,
Shang
Y.
&
Khayatnezhad
M.
2021
Fuzzy stress-based modeling for probabilistic irrigation planning using Copula-NSPSO
.
Water Resource Management
35
,
4943
4959
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02981-6
.
Yin
L.
,
Wang
L.
,
Zheng
W.
,
Ge
L.
,
Tian
J.
,
Liu
Y.
&
Liu
S.
2022
Evaluation of empirical atmospheric models using Swarm-C satellite data
.
Atmosphere
13
(
2
),
294
.
doi:10.3390/atmos13020294
.
Zeleke
K.
,
Luckett
D.
&
Cowley
R.
2011
Calibration and testing of the FAO AquaCrop model for Canola
.
Agronomy Journal
103
,
1610
1618
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).