This paper investigated how the meta-heuristic models can be used to facilitate the estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) images. Focusing on estimating daily ET directly from received images of the electromagnetic bands of Landsat 8 satellite utilizing metaheuristic models, authors used daily ET images estimated by the SEBAL algorithm to calibrate and verify these models. The results of this research showed that the ANN model with DC and RMSE of 0.98 and 0.09025 mm/day, respectively, is more accurate compared to the ACO (with DC = 0.65 and RMSE = 1.45 mm/day) and PSO (with DC = 0.23 and RMSE = 1.60 mm/day) models in the verification stage in estimating daily ET images. The ACO model compared to the PSO model is more accurate in estimating ET images with DC of 0.65 and 0.23 in the verification step, respectively. While removing half of the training data, the accuracy of the PSO model surpasses the ACO model with DC of 0.85 and 0.80, respectively. Also, the ANN model is more accurate than the other two models in estimating ET, both when considering all the data and half of the training data (with DC = 0.98 and RMSE = 0.09 mm/day).

  • A new methodology is proposed for more efficient ET estimation.

  • The applications of meta-heuristic models are evaluated in estimating ET.

  • Meta-heuristics models are calibrated and verified using remotely sensed data.

  • The most efficient meta-heuristic model in ET images estimation is the ANN model.

  • The proposed methodology improves the process of ET estimation in SEBAL.

Until now, by systematizing the acquisition of wells and installing smart meters, steps have been taken in relation to the sustainable management of groundwater resources. Measuring the amount of water withdrawal from a well by a smart meter is not suitable for measuring the actual consumption of water resources, because the amount of water withdrawal and the efficiency of management scenarios need to consider the type of irrigation and especially the amount of return flow. Therefore, it is necessary to use water based on the rate of evapotranspiration (ET) and assign its main task to an expert and trusted group. Regarding this, remote sensing of ET can be helpful for monitoring real water consumption and saving irrigation water in water-scarce regions (Cetin et al. 2023).

So far, the use of data obtained from satellite images and remote sensing methods have always been used in various areas of environmental and natural resource management and monitoring (Field et al. 1995; Gao et al. 2013). As an example, Fang et al. (2012) measured and investigated the growth stages of plants in pastures using remote sensing data. In another research, Shakoor et al. (2006) introduced the application of remote sensing techniques for water resources management and planning in a basin in Pakistan. This research described the importance and capabilities of new methods such as remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) as tools for monitoring, protecting and managing water resources. The method of remote sensing analysis and GIS can show where water enters the basin and how it leaves the basin through ET and runoff. In this way, using this information, planners can identify places that have potential for the development of new water sources. This development can include redistribution and transfer of water between basins. As a result, the main goal of aforementioned research was to accurately calculate the cultivation pattern and water requirement of agricultural products in the target basin by combining a hydraulic model and data obtained from remote sensing. Psomas et al. (2016) discussed the concept of sustainable management of water resources in the agricultural sector using remote sensing and the concept of water, energy, land, and food nexus in the Pinios river basin of Greece. They extracted the historical data related to the cultivation and land use pattern in the desired area using satellite images and remote sensing and hired it as input information in a hydrological model. In the research of Hamzeh et al. (2016), by using the fuzzy-hierarchical decision-making structure and satellite images, including images related to land topography, salinity, alkalinity, moisture and soil texture, to make a decision to choose suitable areas for barley cultivation in the Shavor plain of Khuzestan.

Recently, satellite-based ET estimation models have been developed (Allen et al., 2007; Fisher et al., 2008; Leuning et al., 2008; Jung et al., 2009; Mu et al., 2011; French et al., 2015; Shekar & Raju 2022). Regarding the estimation of ET using satellite images, Ramos et al. (2009) calculated the amount of ET in the Ebro plain in Spain for a period of 4 years by satellite data and based on the energy balance model namely the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL). And then the estimated ET was compared with the calculated ET values obtained from the experimental formulas. This comparison indicates a 20% difference between the results of SEBAL algorithm and the results of experimental equations in estimating ET. In Bellvert et al. (2018), actual ET and plant growth coefficient were calculated for almond and pistachio fields located in the Central Valley in California during their growing period. These calculations were done by combining a simple crop ET model and satellite data. Rahimzadegan & Janani (2019) investigated the efficiency of the SEBAL algorithm to estimate the ET of the pistachio plant, which is one of the most important agricultural products in Iran. In this research, they used 29 images of Landsat 8 in a period of 3 years for pistachio orchards in Sarkheh city area in Semnan province. The remotely sensed ET was compared with the ET calculated by the iMetos-pessl device. The results of this research proved that this algorithm is very accurate for calculating the actual ET for pistachio during its growing period and can be a good tool for this purpose in water resources management. Badiehneshin et al. (2019) estimated the actual ET in pistachio orchards using Landsat 7 satellite images for 2000 and 2001 using the SEBAL algorithm. The obtained results were compared with the available lysimetric data. The results of this research indicated an error of 20% equivalent to 0.6 mm in the estimation of real ET. They reached the conclusion that in order to better manage the irrigation deficiency of pistachio plant, it is possible to improve the performance of pistachio orchards by reducing irrigation in the pistachio growth stage and increasing irrigation in the third stage. Sane et al. (2020) calculated the actual daily ET in the Verdij area in the north of Tehran using the image of Landsat 8 in 2019 and the SEBAL algorithm. They compared the obtained result with the ET calculated by the experimental equations of Fao Penman-Monteith, Samani Hargreaves, and Blaney Kridel. The result of this research indicated the high efficiency of the SEBAL algorithm in estimating daily ET. Safari et al. (2023) developed a market-based mechanism for long-term groundwater management using remotely sensed data of ET. This paper aims to improve the efficiency of the water market mechanism by monitoring the withdrawal from the Rafsanjan Plain aquifer. For this purpose, the authors successfully used SEBAL algorithm for remote sensing of the ET of pistachio orchards. Nevertheless, in the aforementioned research, the large model uncertainties and too many input variables of the SEBAL algorithm were pointed out as the main challenges of this method including determining the reference crop ET, calculating the surface temperature, determining the appropriate hot and cold pixels, etc.

The fundamental goal of using machine learning models for estimating ET with the help of remotely sensed ET images data is to accurately predict and quantify the amount of water that is evaporated from the Earth's surface and transpired by plants. ET is an important component of the Earth's water cycle and plays a crucial role in various fields such as agriculture, hydrology, and climate modeling. By utilizing machine learning models (meta-heuristic models), researchers aim to leverage the power of algorithms to analyze and interpret the complex relationships between remotely sensed ET images and other relevant variables. These models can learn from the calibration and verification data to establish patterns and correlations, enabling them to estimate ET in areas where direct measurements may be limited or unavailable.

The use of machine learning models offers several advantages, including the ability to handle large volumes of data, capture non-linear relationships, and adapt to changing environmental conditions. By accurately estimating ET, these models can provide valuable insights into water resource management, irrigation scheduling, drought monitoring, and climate change studies, ultimately contributing to more sustainable and efficient water management practices (Yang et al. 2021).

In recent years, machine learning techniques have advanced significantly in estimating ET. In order to estimate daily reference ET, Hai et al. (2018) introduced the innovative hybridized fuzzy model with frefy algorithm (ANFIS-FA). They showed that the ANFIS-FA model performed better than the other ANFIS-based model. Six artificial intelligence (AI) models were used by Sanikhani et al. (2019) to estimate reference ET using temperature-based climate data from two stations; all of the AI models showed good accuracy and outperformed the Hargreaves-Samani (HS) equation. In order to forecast reference evaporation using weather factors as input variables, Khosravi et al. (2019) used nine models (including data mining techniques and hybrid ANFIS models). The findings showed that hybrid models performed better than the individual models. To predict ET from meteorological data, Salih et al. (2019) presented the co-active neuro-fuzzy inference system (CANFIS) model. They revealed that the CANFIS gave higher accuracy compared with AI models. Mohammadrezapour et al. (2019) explored the possibility of predicting ET using three different heuristic methods, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and gene expression programming (GEP). Monthly weather data were used to calculate the potential ET at four synoptic stations. SVM, ANFIS, and GEP models were used to estimate potential ET based on the weather data. In Malik et al. (2020), multiple learning AI models (MM-ANN, MGGP, MARS, SVM, and M5Tree) were used to predict monthly pan evaporation based on climatological information. Yang et al. (2021) coupled four machine learning models with four energy-based ET estimation methods using Bayesian model averaging method (BMA). Among all eight single models, the BMA method outperformed all of them, reducing uncertainties among them and taking different intrinsic advantages of empirical and physical models into account.

As discussed, machine learning techniques have been increasingly used in remote sensing of ET estimation, offering several advantages over traditional methods. Recent papers have highlighted the positive impact of machine learning in this field.

  1. Improved accuracy: Machine learning algorithms can effectively capture complex relationships between input variables and ET, leading to improved accuracy compared to traditional empirical models. For example, a study by Yang et al. (2021) used random forest regression to estimate ET from satellite data and achieved higher accuracy compared to the widely used SEBAL.

  2. Reduced data requirements: Machine learning algorithms can handle large datasets efficiently and extract relevant features automatically, reducing the need for extensive preprocessing or manual feature selection. This capability is particularly valuable when dealing with multi-temporal and multi-sensor remote sensing data (Agrawal et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2022; Yong et al. 2023).

  3. Transferability: Machine learning models trained on one region or dataset can often be transferred to other regions or datasets with minimal adaptation, making them more versatile than traditional models that require recalibration for each new location or dataset. This transferability is crucial for large-scale applications of ET estimation using remote sensing data (Diaz-Gonzalez et al. 2022).

  4. Real-time monitoring: Machine learning algorithms can provide near real-time estimates of ET by processing satellite imagery as it becomes available, enabling timely monitoring of water resources and agricultural practices (Amani & Shafizadeh-Moghadam 2023).

In conclusion, recent papers demonstrate that machine learning techniques have a significant positive impact on remote sensing of ET estimation. They offer improved accuracy, enhanced spatial resolution, reduced data requirements, transferability across regions/datasets, and real-time monitoring capabilities. Despite these advantages, challenges remain in the application of machine learning techniques for remote sensing of ET. These include the need for large and diverse training datasets, potential overfitting issues, interpretability of complex models, and the requirement for domain knowledge to ensure accurate model selection and validation. Further research is needed to address challenges and refine these techniques for more robust and reliable ET estimation.

In spite of this promising attempts, there is still a lack of studies in evaluating the application of machine learning models in getting rid of the difficulty of calculating various parameters of energy balance-based ET measurement methods and removing the uncertainties resulting from these parameters. Utilizing remote sensing data as independent variables of machine learning models rather than incorporating additional meteorological parameters is another factor that needs to be studied more (e.g., estimating ET based on electromagnetic band images from satellite images). Accurate, user-friendly and real time estimation of daily ET by using new techniques such as machine learning can help to monitor net water consumption, irrigation management and drought management in fields.

The use of traditional methods and field data to monitor ET and evaluate water resources real consumption is very time-consuming and expensive, and in most cases it gives a poor estimate of the amount of water in the region. The use of satellite images and remote sensing technology is very economical and reasonable due to saving time and money. Nevertheless, on the one hand, the accuracy of remote sensing models is always in doubt, and on the other hand, the complexity, volume, and computational cost of these models are significant. Based on this, the question arises as to how meta-heuristics models can be used to pave the way for the use of remote sensing models of ET. The information received from satellite images has several electromagnetic bands and each band (each image) contains countless information pixels. Therefore, the accuracy and power of meta-heuristics models in calibrating and validating an ET estimation model using satellite images is discussed. Therefore, in this research, it is supposed to measure the daily ET using SEBAL algorithm. Then, using the input data of electromagnetic bands of Landsat 8 as predictors and output of daily ET images obtained in the previous stage as predictant, various meta-heuristics models were calibrated and verified, and the efficiency of these models were evaluated and compared.

According to the reviewed researches, the novelty of the paper is the use of images of the electromagnetic bands of Landsat 8 and daily ET estimated by SEBAL algorithm as independent and dependent variables, respectively, for calibrating and verifying of meta-heuristic models. In this regard, for the first time, the ant colony optimization (ACO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used to estimate the daily ET images of the study area from electromagnetic band images from Landsat 8.

The other parts of this article are organized as follows. In the material and methods section, a brief introduction of the SEBAL algorithm and meta-heuristics models is given. Then, the study area is introduced and in the next part, the discussion about the results obtained from the introduced models is discussed. In the final part of this research, the final conclusion and summary of the research is discussed.

Figure 1 illustrates a flowchart of the different stages of daily ET calculation by the SEBAL algorithm and meta-heuristic models. In this research, daily ET images are obtained using Landsat 8 satellite images and SEBAL algorithm. Then these data are used for calibrating and verifying the accuracy of meta-heuristic models, and the accuracy and efficiency of these models are measured in estimating daily ET images. With this approach, instead of using SEBAL algorithm for daily ET estimation, it is possible to use trained meta-heuristic models and reduce the computational cost of SEBAL algorithm. In this regard, the steps of conducting this research are as follows:
  • (1)

    Acquisition of Landsat 8 images of the study area (including seven short wavelength bands and one thermal band) on different dates.

  • (2)

    Applying the SEBAL algorithm for estimating daily ET images on the desired dates.

  • (3)

    Using the data obtained from step (1) as independent variables (predictors) and the ET estimated in step (2) as dependent variables (responses) for calibration and verification of the meta-heuristic models (i.e., ACO, PSO, and ANN).

  • (4)

    Evaluating and comparing the efficiency and accuracy of the above-mentioned models in estimating the ET images.

Figure 1

A flowchart of the proposed methodology.

Figure 1

A flowchart of the proposed methodology.

Close modal

In the following, the SEBAL algorithm and the ACO, PSO, and ANN models are discussed.

SEBAL algorithm

In the SEBAL algorithm, the amount of ET is calculated based on the energy balance equation using satellite images and minimum necessary field data. Since the satellite image can only provide information at the time of the satellite's passage, SEBAL algorithms can calculate the instantaneous ET flux at the time of the image. Finally, the ET flux for each image pixel is calculated as the remainder of the surface energy balance equation (Figure 2 and Equation (1)).
(1)
where , , H, and G represent latent heat flux (W/m2), net radiation (W/m2), sensible heat flux (W/m2) and soil heat flux (W/m2), respectively.
Figure 2

Schematic of surface energy balance and related parameters (Allen et al. 2002).

Figure 2

Schematic of surface energy balance and related parameters (Allen et al. 2002).

Close modal
In order to solve the surface energy balance equation in the SEBAL algorithm, the calculation of the surface net radiation flux (Rn) using the input and output radiation fluxes is as follows (Figure 3 and Equation (2)):
(2)
where , , and denote incoming shortwave radiation, incoming longwave radiation and outgoing longwave radiation (W/m2), respectively. and are surface albedo and surface thermal emissivity, respectively.
Figure 3

Input and output energies from the vegetation surface (Allen et al. 2002).

Figure 3

Input and output energies from the vegetation surface (Allen et al. 2002).

Close modal
Soil heat flux is the rate of heat transfer in soil and vegetation due to molecular conduction. Since it is difficult to directly calculate the amount of soil heat flux with satellite images, in the SEBAL and metric method, first the G/Rn ratio is calculated in the middle of the day using the empirical Equation (3) (Allen et al. 2002).
(3)
where and are surface temperature (°C) and normalized difference vegetation index, respectively.

The value of G is obtained by multiplying the above ratio by Rn. For access to other computational details of the above relationship, refer to Safari et al. (2023).

After implementing the different calculation steps of SEBAL algorithm (Safari et al. 2023), the instantaneous value of latent heat flux for the time of the satellite overpass the (λET) is calculated using Equation (4). Using the instantaneous latent heat flux obtained, the amount of instantaneous ET is calculated in the form of Equation (4) (Allen et al. 2002).
(4)
where and are instantaneous ET (mm/h) and latent heat of vaporization or the heat absorbed when a kilogram of water evaporates (J/kg), respectively.
Equation (5) can be used to calculate the latent heat of evaporation (Allen et al. 2002).
(5)
To calculate instantaneous ET using the SEBAL algorithm, the Λ parameter, which is known as the evaporation fraction, should be calculated. This fraction (Equation (6)) shows the ratio of the energy consumed for the ET process on the total amount of energy available for this process.
(6)
Although sensible heat flux (H) and latent heat flux (λET) are very variable during the day, while the evaporation fraction is constant during the day. Based on this:
(7)
Finally, to calculate the daily ET, assuming that the evaporation fraction (‘Λ’) is constant and the value of the soil heat flux parameter (G) is insignificant in 24 h, the following equation is used (Bastiaanssen 1995):
(8)
where represents 24-h actual ET (mm/day). and are water density (1,000 kg/m3) and average daily net radiation (W/m2), respectively.

Meta-heuristic models

In the following sub-sections, a brief introduction of simulation and optimization models will be discussed. It is supposed to estimate ET from the band data received from Landsat 8 satellite by using these algorithms, and the accuracy of each of these methods will be evaluated and compared.

ACO model

The detailed investigation of the behavior of many creatures in nature has been the basis of many human research methods. Among these unique behaviors is the ability of an ant to find the shortest passage to reach food, which is done with the cooperation of other members of the ant community. In the early nineties, the first attempts to exploit this behavior of ants were formed in the minds of some researchers. Colorni et al. (1991) presented several articles in the introduction of a computational algorithm called ant system. The basis of this theory is inspired by the behavior of searching for food by the community of ants. The sense of sight of ants is very weak and even a group of them are completely blind, for this reason the most communication between all ants is through the chemical substances (pheromone) left by them. Ants use this chemical to mark the route from the nest to the target (food). The shorter the path chosen by an ant the greater the amount of pheromone that the ant leaves on the ridges forming the path. In order to prevent all ants from choosing only one path, pheromone evaporation is considered. In this algorithm, the amount of pheromone of each path is calculated based on the following equation (Cordon et al. 2002):
(9)
In this equation, τij(t+1) and τij are the amount of pheromone remaining in route ij before and after updating, respectively. ρ is the evaporation parameter. Δτij (t) represents the amount of pheromone left by ants on the mentioned path at time t, and its value can be calculated according to the following equation (Cordon et al. 2002):
(10)
In this equation, m represents the number of ants that search the decision space to find the optimal solution. Based on this, the amount of pheromone left by the mentioned ant in the tth repetition on the path ij is obtained from the following equation (Cordon et al. 2002):
(11)
In this equation, Q is a constant number and Lk is the length of the path traveled by the kth ant. The probability that the kth ant chooses the path i and j is according to the following equation (Cordon et al. 2002):
(12)

In this equation, represents the reverse of the distance between route ij; a and β are two parameters that determine the relative effect of τij and . i is the node that the kth ant wants to choose from the nodes it has not met yet. Finally, the path that has the highest amount of pheromone is selected as the optimal path (the general optimal solution of the problem).

PSO model

The PSO model was first proposed in the mid-1990s by Kennedy & Eberhart (1995). This method is inspired by the movement of a group of birds to find the best path among other birds. In the PSO method, the set of random solutions is used as an initial solution in the decision space in order to reach the optimal solution through an iterative process.

Based on this, Kennedy & Eberhart (1995) developed the PSO model through bird flock simulation. In this model, the position of each agent and its speed are represented by s and v, respectively. Correcting the position of the operator is done using position and speed information. Flocks of birds optimize a specific objective function. Each agent knows its best value so far (Pbest) and its position s. Also, each agent is aware of the best value ever obtained in the group (Gbest). In other words, in an optimization problem, each particle chooses a location in the decision space as a desirable position (Pbest). This position contains the answers to the problem (the decision variables of the problem). Using the velocity parameter (v), each particle modifies its location many times to reach the best and most desirable point (general optimal point). In other words, one memory is allocated to store the best position of each particle in the past (Pbest) and one memory to store the best position among all particles (Gbest). With the experience of these memories, the particles decide how to move in the next turn. In each iteration, all the particles move in the n-dimensional space of the problem until finally the general optimal point is found (Figure 4).
Figure 4

The movement and evolution of the location of a particle towards the optimal location (Bouallègue et al. 2012).

Figure 4

The movement and evolution of the location of a particle towards the optimal location (Bouallègue et al. 2012).

Close modal
Based on this, the speed of each factor can be calculated from the following equation (Poli et al. 2007):
(13)
(14)

In this equation, and represent the best location experienced by a particle and the best location experienced by the entire population in the kth displacement iteration, respectively. c, r, and ω are the acceleration coefficient, random number between 0 and 1, and speed guiding coefficient, respectively. According to Equation (14), the new position of a particle is the previous position of that particle plus the velocity vector . The term itself consists of three separate terms, the sum of all three vectors which are a coefficient of three vectors (the vector from the primary location ends to the secondary location of the particle). The spatial changes of the particles will eventually be such that all the particles will be concentrated in the optimal position and the coordinates of this position will be the solution to the optimization problem. The criteria of the number of repetitions of the problem and the optimality of the solutions are determined based on the definition of an objective function that should be minimized or maximized based on the position of the particles.

Artificial neural networks

One of the innovative methods in optimization and modeling is the ANN method, which is inspired by the structure of brain neurons in learning. One of the prominent types of neural networks is the multi-layer perceptron network, which includes an input layer, one or more hidden layers, and an output layer. Figure 5 shows an example of a three-layer network with a sigmoid driving function. The number of neurons in the first layer in the network is 2, 4, 6, etc. Also, the number of intermediate layer neurons for different modes is between 3 and 30 neurons. The output layer also includes a neuron that shows the output response value of the model.
Figure 5

The schematic of the artificial neural network (Nourani et al. 2009).

Figure 5

The schematic of the artificial neural network (Nourani et al. 2009).

Close modal
In the neural network structure of Figure 5, Xi is the input variables, y is the output variable, w is the weight coefficients in the network, n, m and k are the number of neurons in the input layer, middle layer and output layer, respectively. This structure can be expressed in the form of the following equation (Nourani et al. 2009):
(15)

In this regard, the ANN model estimates the weight coefficients of the last equation using the training (observation) data during the training (calibration) process. By estimating these weight coefficients, the simulation function is calculated and can predict and calculate the response of the model for the input data.

In the present study, to determine the accuracy of the modeling of daily evaporation-transpiration images, the determination coefficient (DC) (dimensionless) and root mean square errors (RMSE) (cubic meters per second) are used (Equations (16) and (17)) (Nourani et al. 2009).

The closer the DC is to one and the smaller the RMSE, the higher the accuracy and efficiency of the model. Therefore, the RMSE criterion can be considered as the objective function that should be minimized in the PSO algorithm.
(16)
(17)

In the above equations, N is the number of observational data, Qobs is the observational data, Qcom is the estimated value and is the average of the observational data.

Case study

In order to evaluate the presented methodology, the data related to Kohdasht plain located in Lorestan province as one of the prohibited plains of the country in terms of groundwater extraction have been used (Figure 6). The study area of Kohdasht is equal to 1,129.3 km2, of which the plain area is 300.7 square kilometers and the rest is related to the highlands of the study area. Its area spans between 33° 26′ to 33° 27′ longitude and 47° 44 ′ to 47° 28 ′ latitude. The mean, minimum, and maximum elevation of the plain are 1,330; 1,261; and 1,396 m, respectively. The mean annual precipitation is 454 mm and the mean, minimum and maximum annual temperature are 16.7, 5, and 30 °C, respectively. The mean annual evaporation of the plain is 2,128 mm.
Figure 6

The location of the Kohdasht plain.

Figure 6

The location of the Kohdasht plain.

Close modal

In the plain of Kohdasht, the average level of underground water varies between 1,150 m located in the lands of Malmir, Katuleh and Boghlan located in the south of the plain to 1,180 m in the lands of the alluvial cone located in the west of the plain. In the last decade, indiscriminate exploitation of underground water resources has caused a sharp drop in the underground water level in this plain. In the alluvial cone lands of the plain, the hydraulic slope of the underground water is more than 5 per thousand, which decreases toward the center of the plain and reaches less than 4 per thousand in the southern lands of the plain.

In the alluvial cone lands of the plain, the depth of contact with the underground water level is more than 75 m, and in the southern lands of the plain, it is less than 25 m.

As stated in the previous section, in this research, daily ET images should be estimated using Landsat 8 satellite images and SEBAL algorithm. SEBAL algorithm is used to estimate ET in agricultural fields. Therefore, a part of the study area whose surface is covered by agricultural fields is selected as the sampling area according to Figure 7. Based on this, after remote sensing of the ET, the data of the ET images in this area are used to calibrate and validate the prospecting models. In this regard, first, the daily ET of the study area is remotely sensed by the SEBAL algorithm on March 23, 2019, August 30, 2019, June 13, 2020, and April 17, 2020. The reason for choosing these images on these specific dates for remote sensing of the ET is the low cloudiness of the images and the coverage of different seasons with different weather conditions in the study area. It is worth mentioning that each Landsat 8 satellite image contains information pixels with dimensions of 30 × 30 m.
Figure 7

The sampling area of remote sensing of ET in the study area.

Figure 7

The sampling area of remote sensing of ET in the study area.

Close modal

The input images of the SEBAL algorithm (seven short range bands and one thermal band obtained from Landsat 8 satellite) and the output images estimated by SEBAL algorithm (daily ET) as, respectively, independent and dependent variables are used for calibration and verification data of meta-heuristic models, respectively.

In the following, the input and output data of the SEBAL algorithm are collected in order to calibrate and validate the ACO, PSO, and ANN meta-heuristic models. Figures 811 show the images of the input and output data of the SEBAL algorithm, which are supposed to be used in the meta-heuristic models, on the desired dates in the desired range of the Kohdasht Plain (Figure 7). In these figures, the images of bands 1–8 represent the electromagnetic energy received by the satellite (reflectance) in watts per square meter and the evaporation-transpiration images in millimeters per day.
Figure 8

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on March 23, 2019.

Figure 8

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on March 23, 2019.

Close modal
Figure 9

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on August 30, 2019.

Figure 9

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on August 30, 2019.

Close modal
Figure 10

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on April 17, 2020.

Figure 10

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on April 17, 2020.

Close modal
Figure 11

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on June 13, 2020.

Figure 11

Landsat 8 band images and remote sense ET image on June 13, 2020.

Close modal

At this stage, the received images of the electromagnetic bands of Landsat 8 and remotely sensed ET images are, respectively, used as input and output response in meta-heuristic models. The input pixel data set for each of the 8 bands is 164,528 pixels equal to 164,528 × 8 = 1,316,226 pixel data for each shooting date. The number of pixels of remotely sensed transpiration evaporation images is the same. Finally, 70% of these data are used for calibration and the remaining 30% for the verification of ACO, PSO, and ANN models.

In the following, the results of calibration and verification of the above-mentioned models will be discussed. Due to the large amount of training data, ACO and PSO models did not perform well when faced with a large amount of calibration and verification data. Therefore, the last two models were executed once for all the data and once for only half of the data. In these models, the objective function is to minimize the RMSE error resulting from the comparison of computational data (ET images calculated in meta-heuristic models) and observational data (ET images obtained from the SEBAL algorithm).

Figure 12 shows the convergence diagram of the objective function of the ACO model. Figure 13 also presents the scatter diagram of computational and observational data in the calibration and verification stage. ACO model with DC and RMSE of 0.65 and 1.45 (mm/day), respectively, in the verification stage, does not have a good accuracy in estimating daily ET. Nevertheless, by using 50% of the modeling data, the ACO with DC and RMSE of 0.74 and 1.38 (mm/day), respectively, shows a relatively better efficiency in the verification stage.
Figure 12

The convergence diagram of the objective function of the ACO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Figure 12

The convergence diagram of the objective function of the ACO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Close modal
Figure 13

Scatter plot of computed and observed data of the ACO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Figure 13

Scatter plot of computed and observed data of the ACO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Close modal
In the following, the modeling results of daily ET images by the PSO model are discussed. Figure 14 shows the convergence diagram of the objective function of the PSO model. The scatter diagram of computational data and observations in the calibration and verification stage of this model is presented in Figure 15. Based on the obtained results, the PSO model, similar to the ACO model, does not have the appropriate accuracy in the verification stage with DC and RMSE of 0.23 and 1.60, respectively. Also, by removing half of the modeling data and running the PSO model for a smaller amount of data, the accuracy of the model increases with DC and RMSE of 0.85 and 0.93 (mm/day), respectively, in the verification stage. By comparing the results of the two recent models, it is concluded that the relative accuracy of modeling daily ET images in the ACO model is higher than the PSO model. Nevertheless, by reducing the amount of input data, the accuracy of the PSO model surpasses the ACO.
Figure 14

The convergence diagram of the objective function of the PSO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Figure 14

The convergence diagram of the objective function of the PSO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Close modal
Figure 15

Scatter plot of computed and observed data of the PSO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Figure 15

Scatter plot of computed and observed data of the PSO model in the case of using (a) all data and (b) half of the data.

Close modal
Finally, the results obtained from modeling remotely sensed data of ET by ANN model are discussed. As shown in Figure 16, the convergence diagram of the objective function in the ANN model has converged after about 70 iterations, and the objective function of the model (RMSE) is at its lowest level (0.1 mm/day) in comparison with the previous two models. Meanwhile, the results of ANN modeling indicate the high efficiency of this model in modeling a huge volume of calibration and verification data, so that by considering 100% of the data related to the input and output images, the accuracy and efficiency of the ANN model is higher than the ACO and PSO models. Figure 17 also shows the scatter diagram of computational data and observations in the calibration and verification stage of this model. Modeling remotely sensed images of ET by ANN model with DC and RMSE of 0.98 and 0.0902 (mm/day), respectively, in the verification stage indicates the high relative accuracy and efficiency of this model.
Figure 16

The convergence diagram of the objective function of the ANN model.

Figure 16

The convergence diagram of the objective function of the ANN model.

Close modal
Figure 17

Scatter plot of computed and observed data of the ANN model.

Figure 17

Scatter plot of computed and observed data of the ANN model.

Close modal

Table 1 compares the accuracy and efficiency of the ACO, PSO and ANN models. In the comparison of ACO and PSO models in the simulation of daily ET images, it can be said that when calibration and verification are done considering all the data, the ACO modeling accuracy (with DC and RMSE of 0.65 and 1.45 mm/day in the verification stage, respectively) is higher than the PSO model (with DC and RMSE of 0.23 and 1.60 mm/day in the verification stage, respectively). While removing half of the calibration and verification data, the accuracy of the PSO (with DC and RMSE of 0.85 and 0.93 mm/day in the verification stage, respectively) model has surpassed the ACO (with DC and RMSE of 0.80 and 1.09 mm/day in the verification stage, respectively) model. It can be concluded that by reducing the training data, the efficiency of the ACO and PSO model in estimating daily ET images can be increased by 23 and 269%, respectively.

Table 1

Comparison of the results obtained from the modeling of ET using different meta-heuristic models

Assessment criteriaACO
PSO
ANN
CalibrationVerificationCalibrationVerificationCalibrationVerification
Using all data DC 0.42 0.65 0.64 0.23 0.98 0.98 
RMSE mm/day 1.45 1.57 1.60 0.09 0.09 
Using half of the data DC 0.74 0.80 0.87 0.85 0.99 0.98 
RMSE mm/day 1.38 1.09 0.96 0.93 0.09 0.09 
Assessment criteriaACO
PSO
ANN
CalibrationVerificationCalibrationVerificationCalibrationVerification
Using all data DC 0.42 0.65 0.64 0.23 0.98 0.98 
RMSE mm/day 1.45 1.57 1.60 0.09 0.09 
Using half of the data DC 0.74 0.80 0.87 0.85 0.99 0.98 
RMSE mm/day 1.38 1.09 0.96 0.93 0.09 0.09 

By comparing the ET images modeled by the ANN model with the observed ET images obtained by the SEBAL algorithm and calculating the DC = 0.98 and RMSE = 0.09 mm/day criteria in the verification step for the conditions where both half of the data and all the data are considered in model training, we have come to the conclusion that the accuracy and efficiency of the ANN model in modeling and estimating the ET images is significant. The accuracy of estimating daily ET in the ANN model has increased by 50.7 and 326% compared to the ACO and PSO models, respectively.

Therefore, the ANN model among other meta-heuristic models such as ACO and PSO can be a suitable choice for estimating ET images and getting rid of the complex and time-consuming process of algorithms based on energy balance such as SEBAL.

Last but not least, in the field of ET estimation using meta-heuristic models many studies have used meta-heuristic models for estimating ET and this paper aligns with this approach (Agrawal et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2022; Yong et al. 2023). In addition, SEBAL is a widely accepted method for estimating ET, so the use of training data obtained from this algorithm is in agreement with previous work (Elsayed et al. 2022; Ma et al. 2023). Regarding the efficiency of ANN Models, ANNs have been recognized for their high efficiency in various applications, including ET estimation. The previous papers have also found this, as a point of agreement (Dimitriadou & Nikolakopoulos 2022; Elbeltagi et al. 2022). Furthermore, Krishnashetty et al. (2021) found that ANN approach outperforms support vector machine (SVM) and genetic programming (GP) for ET estimation that is in line with the results of this paper. On the other hand, previous papers have used different sources of training data like FAO Penman–Monteith equation, crop growth stage and weather data (including maximum, minimum and mean air temperature and diurnal temperature range, solar radiation, sunshine duration, relative humidity, and wind speed) instead of the SEBAL algorithm, this could be a point of disagreement (Krishnashetty et al. 2021; Qin et al. 2022).

ET is considered as one of the most important components of the hydrological balance of a region, which represents net water consumption. Based on this, with the development of ET estimation methods in the field, it is possible to monitor consumption and harvests. So far, new methods have been introduced to estimate ET in the watershed based on energy balance using satellite image analysis such as the SEBAL algorithm. The SEBAL algorithm can appropriately and accurately estimate daily ET with appropriate temporal and spatial resolution (every 16 days and 30 m, respectively). However, the process of estimating daily ET satellite images using the electromagnetic bands of Landsat 8 satellite in the SEBAL algorithm has many complications and calculation steps. Therefore, the question is raised, how to use the remote sensing daily ET images by the SEBAL algorithm to calibrate and verify meta-heuristic models in order to reduce the cost and complexity of the SEBAL algorithm.

Machine learning models have proven their capacity to effectively delineate intricate relationships between environmental variables and ET, thereby enhancing accuracy in contrast to traditional empirical models. Nevertheless, the deployment of machine learning methodologies for remote sensing of ET is not without its challenges. These include the necessity for comprehensive training datasets, the potential for overfitting, the interpretability of sophisticated models, and the demand for domain-specific knowledge to ensure precise model selection and validation. The innovative aspect of this paper lies in the employment of Landsat 8′s electromagnetic band images and daily ET derived from the SEBAL algorithm as independent and dependent variables, respectively, for the calibration and verification of meta-heuristic models. In this regard, for the first time, the ACO, PSO and ANNs were used to estimate the daily ET images of the study area.

By comparing the results of estimating daily ET images (as computational data) and remotely sensed daily ET by SEBAL algorithm (as observational data), it was concluded that the ANN model compared to others afore mentioned models, namely ACO and PSO, have very good efficiency and accuracy (with DC and RMSE of 0.98 and 0.0902 (mm/day) respectively in the verification stage). It can also be concluded that by reducing the training data, the efficiency of the ACO and PSO model in estimating daily ET images can be increased by 23 and 269%, respectively. Meanwhile, when considering all the training data, the accuracy of estimating daily ET in the ANN model has increased by 50.7 and 326% compared to the ACO and PSO models, respectively.

The results of this research will enable future researchers to take steps in the direction of verifying these models by being aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the new meta-heuristic models. Also, the machine learning models presented in this research in estimating daily ET can be turned into user software for farmers for irrigation management by cloud computing researchers.

Although this research has evaluated the meta-heuristic models in the modeling of data related to satellite images, one of the main limitations of this research is the lack of access to lysimetric data to evaluate the accuracy of the SEBAL algorithm in the study area. Therefore, it is recommended to pay attention to solving this limitation in future researches. Meanwhile, the ANN model has significant efficiency and accuracy for estimating daily ET in the study area. However, the accuracy of this model in estimating daily ET in other study areas with different hydroclimatological conditions and cultivation patterns is doubtful. Therefore, it is suggested to pay attention to this issue in future researches. Finally, the primary objective of this paper was to explore the potential of using black box (machine learning) models for estimating daily ET based on electromagnetic band images from Landsat 8. As such, the emphasis was placed on utilizing remote sensing data as independent variables rather than incorporating additional meteorological parameters. However, we recommend that future research endeavors specifically address wind speed, sunshine hours, temperature, and evaporation alongside remote sensing data to gain a more comprehensive understanding of their combined influence on ET.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Agrawal
Y.
,
Kumar
M.
,
Ananthakrishnan
S.
&
Kumarapuram
G.
2022
Evapotranspiration modeling using different tree based ensembled machine learning algorithm
.
Water Resources Management
36
(
3
),
1025
1042
.
Allen
R.
,
Waters
R.
,
Bastiaanssen
W.
,
Tasumi
M.
&
Trezza
R.
2002
SEBAL. Surface Energy Balance Algorithms for Land. Idaho Implementation
.
Advanced Training and Users Manual
,
Idaho, USA
.
Allen
R. G.
,
Tasumi
M.
&
Trezza
R.
2007
Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)—model
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
133
(
4
),
380
394
.
Badiehneshin
A.
,
Parsinejad
M.
&
Noory
H.
2019
Evaluation of the different levels of water supply in pistachio gardens using SEBAL algorithm (The case study of Sirjan Plain)
.
Journal of Soil and Water Resources Conservation
9
(
1
),
67
86
.
Bastiaanssen
W. G. M.
1995
Regionalization of surface flux densities and moisture indicators in composite terrain A remote sensing approach under clear skies in mediterranean climates
.
PhD Dissertation. CIP Data Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag, The Netherlands
.
Bellvert
J.
,
Adeline
K.
,
Baram
S.
,
Pierce
L.
,
Sanden
B. L.
&
Smart
D. R.
2018
Monitoring crop evapotranspiration and crop coefficients over an almond and pistachio orchard throughout remote sensing
.
Remote Sensing
10
,
200
.
Bouallègue
S.
,
Haggège
J.
&
Benrejeb
M.
2012
A new method for tuning PID-type fuzzy controllers using particle swarm optimization
. In:
Fuzzy Controllers-Recent Advances in Theory and Applications
,
InTech, London, UK
, pp.
140
159
.
Cetin
M.
,
Alsenjar
O.
,
Aksu
H.
,
Golpinar
M. S.
&
Akgul
M. A.
2023
Estimation of crop water stress index and leaf area index based on remote sensing data
.
Water Supply
23
(
3
),
1390
1404
.
Colorni
A.
,
Dorigo
M.
&
Maniezzo
V.
1991
Distributed optimization by ant colonies
. In
Proceedings of the first European conference on artificial life
, Vol.
142
, pp.
134
142
.
Cordon
O.
,
Herrera Triguero
F.
&
Stützle
T.
2002
A review on the ant colony optimization metaheuristic: Basis, models and new trends
.
Mathware & soft computing
.
Vol. 9 Núm. 2 [-3]
.
Diaz-Gonzalez
F. A.
,
Vuelvas
J.
,
Correa
C. A.
,
Vallejo
V. E.
&
Patino
D.
2022
Machine learning and remote sensing techniques applied to estimate soil indicators–review
.
Ecological Indicators
135
,
108517
.
Elbeltagi
A.
,
Nagy
A.
,
Mohammed
S.
,
Pande
C. B.
,
Kumar
M.
,
Bhat
S. A.
&
Juhász
C.
2022
Combination of limited meteorological data for predicting reference crop evapotranspiration using artificial neural network method
.
Agronomy
12
(
2
),
516
.
Elsayed
H.
,
Ibrahim
H.
,
Farag
H.
&
Sobeih
M. F.
2022
Remote sensing-based techniques for water management in small-scale farms in arid climate
.
Water Supply
22
(
8
),
6692
6714
.
Field
C. B.
,
Randerson
J. T.
&
Malmström
C. M.
1995
Global net primary production: combining ecology and remote sensing
.
Remote Sensing of Environment
51
(
1
),
74
88
.
doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-V
.
French
A. N.
,
Hunsaker
D. J.
&
Thorp
K. R.
2015
Remote sensing of evapotranspiration over cotton using the TSEB and METRIC energy balance models
.
Remote Sensing of Environment
158
,
281
294
.
Gao
Q.
,
Wan
Y.
,
Li
Y.
,
Guo
Y.
,
Ganjurjav
Q. X.
&
Wang
B.
2013
Effects of topography and human activity on the net primary productivity (NPP) of alpine grassland in northern Tibet from 1981 to 2004
.
International Journal of Remote Sensing
34
(
6
),
2057
2069
..
Hai
T.
,
Lamine
D.
,
Ansoumana
B.
,
Kof
D.
,
Malick
N. P.
&
Mundher
Y. Z.
2018
Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with frefy algorithm: regional case study in burkina faso
.
Agricultural Water Management
208
,
140
151
.
Hamzeh
S.
,
Mokarram
M.
,
Haratian
A.
,
Bartholomeus
H.
,
Ligtenberg
A.
&
Bregt
A. K.
2016
Feature selection as a time and cost-saving approach for land suitability classification (Case Study of Shavur Plain, Iran)
.
Agriculture
6
(
4
),
52
.
Kennedy
J.
&
Eberhart
R. C.
1995
Particle swarm optimization
. In
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks IV
.
IEEE Press
,
Piscataway, NJ, USA
, pp.
1942
1948
.
Khosravi
K.
,
Daggupati
P.
,
Alami
M. T.
,
Awadh
S. M.
&
Yaseen
Z. M.
2019
Meteorological data mining and hybrid data-intelligence models for reference evaporation simulation: a case study in Iraq
.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
167
,
105041
.
Krishnashetty
P. H.
,
Balasangameshwara
J.
,
Sreeman
S.
,
Desai
S.
&
Kantharaju
A. B.
2021
Cognitive computing models for estimation of reference evapotranspiration: a review
.
Cognitive Systems Research
70
,
109
116
.
Ma
Y.
,
Sun
S.
,
Li
C.
,
Zhao
J.
,
Li
Z.
&
Jia
C.
2023
Estimation of regional actual evapotranspiration based on the improved SEBAL model
.
Journal of Hydrology
619
,
129283
.
Malik
A.
,
Kumar
A.
,
Kim
S.
,
Kashani
M.
,
Karimi
V.
,
Sharafati
A.
&
Chau
K. W.
2020
Modeling monthly pan evaporation process over the Indian central Himalayas: application of multiple learning artificial intelligence model
.
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
14
(
1
),
323
338
.
Mu
Q.
,
Zhao
M.
&
Running
S. W.
2011
Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm
.
Remote Sensing of Environment
115
(
8
),
1781
1800
.
Nourani
V.
,
Komasi
M.
&
Mano
A.
2009
A multivariate ANN-wavelet approach for rainfall–runoff modeling
.
Water Resources Management
23
,
2877
2894
.
Poli
R.
,
Kennedy
J.
&
Blackwell
T.
2007
Particle swarm optimization: an overview
.
Swarm Intelligence
1
,
33
57
.
Psomas
A.
,
Dagalaki
V.
,
Panagopoulos
Y.
,
Konsta
D.
&
Mimikou
M.
2016
Sustainable agricultural water management in Pinios river basin using remote sensing and hydrologic modeling
.
Procedia Engineering
162
,
277
283
.
Ramos
J. G.
,
Cratchley
C. R.
,
Kay
J. A.
,
Casterad
M. A.
,
Martínez-Cob
A.
&
Dominguez
R.
2009
Evaluation of satellite evapotranspiration estimates using ground-meteorological data available for the Flumen District into the Ebro Valley of NE Spain
.
Agricultural Water Management
96
(
4
),
638
652
.
Safari
S.
,
Sharghi
S.
,
Kerachian
R.
&
Noory
H.
2023
A market-based mechanism for long-term groundwater management using remotely sensed data
.
Journal of Environmental Management
332
,
117409
.
Salih
S. Q.
,
Allawi
M. F.
,
Yousif
A. A.
,
Armanuos
A. M.
&
Yaseen
Z. M.
2019
Viability of the advanced adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system model on reservoir evaporation process simulation: case study of nasser lake in egypt
.
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
13
(
1
),
878
891
.
Sane
M.
,
Kouchakzadeh
M.
&
Sharifi
F.
2020
Evaluation of SEBAL algorithm for estimation of real evapotranspiration in Vardij area
.
Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage
14
(
1
),
125
135
.
Shakoor
A.
,
Shehzad
A.
&
Asghar
M. N.
2006, September
Application of remote sensing techniques for water resources planning and management
. In:
Advances in Space Technologies, 2006 International Conference
.
IEEE
, pp.
142
146
.
Yang
Y.
,
Sun
H.
,
Xue
J.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Liu
L.
,
Yan
D.
&
Gui
D.
2021
Estimating evapotranspiration by coupling Bayesian model averaging methods with machine learning algorithms
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
193
,
1
15
.
Yong
S. L. S.
,
Ng
J. L.
,
Huang
Y. F.
,
Ang
C. K.
,
Mirzaei
M.
&
Ahmed
A. N.
2023
Local and global sensitivity analysis and its contributing factors in reference crop evapotranspiration
.
Water Supply
23
(
4
),
1672
1683
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).