Water-related issues such as scarcity and pollution have become increasingly pressing in sub-Saharan Africa, especially Nigeria, highlighting the need for an effective environmental education (EE) programme. The relationship between EE and water pollution prevention and conservation in Nigeria remains an open question. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the role of EE in water pollution prevention and conservation in Nigeria. A simple random sampling was used to select 766 respondents from the southwest geo-political zone of Nigeria. Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. Results show a high level of awareness of water pollution and conservation strategies. However, people's attitude towards preventing water pollution and conservation was poor. Age does not significantly (at p < 0.05) affect awareness and attitude towards water pollution prevention and conservation. However, the level of education significantly (at p < 0.05) influences the level of awareness and attitude of people towards water pollution prevention and conservation. EE increases awareness and attitude towards water pollution prevention and conservation. Therefore, the Federal Ministries of Water Resources and Education should endeavour to make EE a compulsory programme in the school curriculum across all levels of education.

  • The level of awareness of water pollution prevention and conservation was very high.

  • Attitude towards water pollution prevention and water conservation was very poor.

  • Environmental education increases awareness and promotes a positive attitude towards water conservation.

  • Age of respondents affects the level of awareness or attitude towards water pollution prevention and conservation.

It is impossible to overestimate the role that water plays in maintaining life. Rivers, lakes, and other surface water resources provide a significant percentage of the water needed for domestic, agricultural, and industrial operations. Potable water is frequently tasteless, colourless, and odourless, which makes it safe and suitable for human consumption, according to Oluwande (2011). Unfortunately, the quality of our water resources is declining because of widespread neglect and a lack of suitable infrastructure for protection and treatment. Water pollution has been a major environmental problem in Nigeria, particularly in some states in southwest Nigeria, like Lagos and Oyo, with a high population and volume of waste generation and dumping. Lagos, in particular, is home to a large population and many industrial activities, which contribute to the contamination of water sources. Water pollution in Nigeria is mainly caused by inadequate sewage systems, poor waste management practices, and industrial activities that discharge untreated waste into water bodies. The consequences of this pollution called for concern, as the affected water sources are used for domestic purposes such as drinking, fishing, and irrigation, leading to health problems and economic losses for the nation.

According to Galadima et al. (2011), pollution is the most important problem with Nigeria's local communities' access to water sources. Numerous chemical substances and components in groundwater and surface water can contribute to water pollution. The origins of these compounds are associated with either anthropogenic (human) activities or natural processes. Two significant natural processes add chemicals to water: weathering and soil leaching. In addition, accessible pollutants that damage the soil quality may be absorbed by rainwater seeping into the soil, similar to how rainwater runoff could introduce contaminants to surface waters (Lerh et al. 2011). The main human activities that cause water pollution, according to a WHO report from 2010 (WHO 2010), include a septic tank and cesspool leaks, unintentional spills of hazardous materials, waste stockpiles and piles, mining activities, agricultural activities, polluted surface water infiltration, and landfills. High nitrate, chloride, sulphate, hardness, dissolved solids, detergents, and bacteria are likely present in effluent-contaminated water supplies. Recycling sewage effluent through the local water supply system is to blame for most of the health problems brought on by this type of pollution. Consuming untreated sewage-polluted water poses the most significant risk of epidemics of water-borne illnesses like typhoid, hepatitis, gastroenteritis, and dysentery (WHO 2014).

Mokitlane (2018) reported some of the activities that cause water pollution to include mine pumping to surface water, soil leaching, and mining waste outpouring. Sanitary landfills are disposal landfills or dumps that are covered with soil daily. In many cases, they threaten groundwater quality (Avery 2011). Poor quality and insufficiently available water continue to threaten human health severely. Of the people who live in rural areas, 70% acquire their water from dangerous sources like dams, open wells, rivers, and streams. Millions of people lack access to this fundamental requirement globally, and as a result, they perish from water-borne illnesses and dehydration. The impact of contaminated water is disproportionately felt in underdeveloped countries due to a lack of infrastructure to address sewage and other water sanitation issues. The UN estimates that 95% of untreated urban sewage from developing nations is dumped into the same lakes and rivers that those countries use. Policymakers and communities worldwide, especially those in developing nations, have become increasingly interested in the deterioration of water quality in recent years. Water pollution is now primarily a result of environmental protection negligence. The importance of clean water to both people and the environment cannot be overemphasized.

A high infant mortality rate characterizes Nigeria due to a daily battle for access to water, improper sewage handling, and inadequate sanitation. As a result, over 500,000 people die yearly from malaria, river blindness or onchocerciasis, cholera, giardiasis, amoebiasis, dracunculiasis, and other water contamination-related diseases (Tulchinsky & Varavikova 2014). However, depending on the nature of the disease, the morbidity and mortality rate of water-related diseases can be drastically reduced by providing safe drinking water and adequate sanitation (WHO 2011). Water-borne diseases are diseases that are spread through water containing human and animal faeces and urine, either by drinking or eating food that has been washed with it. They include whipworm, roundworm, typhoid fever, diarrhoea, poliomyelitis, and cholera (Tulchinsky & Varavikova 2014). Poor personal hygiene and coming into contact with contaminated water can transmit these. Trachoma can cause blindness later in life, and skin conditions, including scabies, typhus, and lice, are additional effects of consuming contaminated or dirty water.

A certain quantity of nitrates in water may come from natural sources. However, the excess is more likely due to sewage discharges, farm effluents, or the application of nitrogenous fertilizers on the land. Fluoride concentrations exceeding 1.5 mg/L cause dental fluorosis, while those below 0.5 mg/L increase the risk of dental caries. Nitrates in drinking water can cause methemoglobinemia in newborns (EPA Report 2016). They are seriously affecting both the nation's economy and human health. Therefore, environmental education (EE) is touted as a key remedy for these urgent issues, arming the public with knowledge, values, and skills that support environmental protection and conservation (Peter 2013, p. 57). EE aims to increase awareness of the importance of water as a finite resource and the need to use water efficiently to reduce waste and pollution. This is especially important in Nigeria, where water resources are under pressure due to rapid population growth, urbanization, and climate change (Ayeni 2017). In Nigeria, several initiatives have been aimed at promoting EE and water conservation. For example, the National Water Resources Institute (NWRI) has developed a water resource management curriculum for primary and secondary schools, aiming to increase awareness of the importance of water resources and promote sustainable water use (Sobowale et al. 2015). In addition, NGOs such as WaterAid Nigeria and the Society for Water and Sanitation (NEWSAN) have implemented community-based programmes to increase awareness of the importance of clean water and promote water conservation practices (NEWSAN 2020).

Despite the potential benefits of EE for water pollution prevention and conservation, several barriers exist in its implementation in Nigeria. One of the main challenges is the lack of resources and funding for EE programmes. Many schools and communities lack the materials and equipment to teach EE effectively.

Another challenge is the lack of awareness and understanding of the importance of water conservation among the general public. Many people in Nigeria are unaware of the impact of their water use on the environment and the need for sustainable water management practices (Ayeni 2017). In addition, cultural and religious beliefs can sometimes conflict with EE messages, making it difficult to change attitudes and behaviour towards water use and conservation (Charles & Daniel 2011). For healthy living, water pollution prevention and conservation are important. Several studies, like Iwasaki (2022), have suggested that EE could play a significant role in creating awareness concerning the effects of water pollution and could encourage water pollution prevention and conservation. Water pollution is a significant environmental issue in Nigeria, with many water bodies contaminated by industrial, agricultural, and domestic waste. Despite the numerous studies on water pollution in Nigeria, there are still research gaps that need to be addressed. From the literature, the relationship between EE and water pollution prevention and conservation in Nigeria remains an open question. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the role of EE in water pollution prevention and conservation in Nigeria.

Aim and objectives of the study

The specific objectives of this study are to

  • 1.

    identify the current level of awareness of water pollution prevention and conservation and

  • 2.

    investigate the impact of education level on individual behaviour change towards water pollution prevention and conservation.

The quantitative research method was used in this study to determine the role of EE in water pollution prevention and conservation.

The study area

The southwest is one of Nigeria's six geo-political zones, representing both a geographical and political territory in the country's southwest. It comprises six states: Ekiti, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, and Oyo (Figure 1). The zone extends along the Atlantic coast from the international border with the Benin Republic in the west to the south–south zone in the east and the North Central zone in the north. The southwest is divided into two ecoregions. The Nigerian lowland forests in the south and east, and the Guinean forest-savanna mosaic ecoregion in the drier northwest. In Nigeria, there are two different seasons, the rainy season (March to November) and the dry season (December to February or November to February). The region is characterized by rapid population growth and urbanization, which has resulted in increased industrialization and other economic activities. This has led to the discharge of various pollutants into water bodies, thereby posing a significant threat to water quality and availability.
Figure 1

Map showing the southwest zone of Nigeria. Source: Adedeji et al. (2015).

Figure 1

Map showing the southwest zone of Nigeria. Source: Adedeji et al. (2015).

Close modal

Population and sampling method

Teenagers and adults in all the states in the southwest zone of Nigeria constitute the population for this state. A simple random sampling method was used to select the sample from the entire population. A total of 1,500 respondents were initially targeted. Ultimately 768 responses were received, with 381 responses from male participants and 387 responses from female participants. The distribution of the responses was 230 from Oyo, 167 from Lagos, 140 from Osun, 110 from Ondo, 83 from Ekiti, and 59 from Ogun.

The instrument

The instrument used for data collection was the Awareness and Attitude Towards Water Pollution Prevention and Conservation Questionnaire (AAWPPCQ). A four-point Likert scale, strongly agree, agree, disagree, and strongly disagree, was used. The survey was conducted in 2022 with the sample drawn from across the six states (Ekiti, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, and Oyo) in the southwest geo-political zone of Nigeria, as the subjects of this research.

Validation of instrument

The instrument for the research was assessed for three types of validity: face validity, content validity, and construct validity, before it was distributed to the participants.

Reliability of instrument

The reliability and internal consistency of the subscales in the questionnaire were determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient test (Figure 2). Questions that were not relevant were removed before the questionnaire was distributed to the participants.
Figure 2

Flow chart for data collection and result validation.

Figure 2

Flow chart for data collection and result validation.

Close modal

Procedure for data collection

The data-gathering instrument in this approach was a questionnaire. It was divided into four sections: demographic characteristics of the respondents, awareness and attitudes towards water pollution, awareness and attitudes towards water conservation, and participants' awareness and perceptions of EE.

Data analysis

The data collected through the questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance to provide insights into the perceptions of EE and its impact on Nigeria's water conservation and pollution prevention.

Ethical issue

The study objectives were conveyed to all the respondents before administering the questionnaires. Participants were guaranteed confidentiality and made aware of their right to withdraw from the study at any time.

Demographic data of the respondents

Data were collected from 766 individuals in Nigeria with diverse educational backgrounds to gauge their awareness and attitude towards the role EE plays in water pollution prevention and conservation. In the study, 386 females and 380 males participated (Table 1). Most of the respondents were active youth aged 21–30 years (Table 1). The six states in the southwest zone of Nigeria were all represented (Table 1). More than 98% of the respondents were literate, as shown in Table 1 below. More than 50% of the respondents had bachelor's degrees (Table 1).

Table 1

Socioeconomic descriptors of respondents in the study area

FrequencyPercentageCumulative percentage
Gender 
 Male 380 49.6 49.6 
 Female 386 50.4 100 
Total 766 100 
Age (years) 
 15–20 150 20 20 
 21–30 437 57 77 
 31–40 109 14 91 
 41–50 056 07 98 
 51–60 014 02 100 
Total 766 100 
Education level 
 None 003 0.4 0.4 
 Senior Secondary Certificate Examination 152 20 20.4 
 Diploma 074 9.6 30 
 Degree 422 55 85 
 Master 091 12 97 
 Other 024 100 
Total 766 100 
Location (State) 
 Ekiti 80 10 10 
 Lagos 154 20 30 
 Ogun 73 10 40 
 Ondo 104 14 54 
 Osun 132 17 71 
 Oyo 223 29 100 
Total 766 100 
FrequencyPercentageCumulative percentage
Gender 
 Male 380 49.6 49.6 
 Female 386 50.4 100 
Total 766 100 
Age (years) 
 15–20 150 20 20 
 21–30 437 57 77 
 31–40 109 14 91 
 41–50 056 07 98 
 51–60 014 02 100 
Total 766 100 
Education level 
 None 003 0.4 0.4 
 Senior Secondary Certificate Examination 152 20 20.4 
 Diploma 074 9.6 30 
 Degree 422 55 85 
 Master 091 12 97 
 Other 024 100 
Total 766 100 
Location (State) 
 Ekiti 80 10 10 
 Lagos 154 20 30 
 Ogun 73 10 40 
 Ondo 104 14 54 
 Osun 132 17 71 
 Oyo 223 29 100 
Total 766 100 

Awareness of water pollution prevention and conservation

This survey collected data from 766 individuals in Nigeria with diverse educational backgrounds to gauge their views on the increase in frequency and severity of water pollution and conservation in recent years. Based on the data in Table 2, almost all the respondents (88.3%) had a good attitude towards open defecation. They agreed that open defecation pollutes rivers, lakes, and the sea. Based on the level of awareness of water pollution arising from farm chemicals, more than 90% of the respondents are aware that water bodies like rivers, lakes, and seas in Nigeria were polluted as a result of agrochemicals used on the farm. Only 7.6% of respondents strongly disagreed with the statement (Table 2). The level of awareness of the respondents concerning water pollution because of illegal mining is high. More than 90% of the respondents were aware of this source of water pollution, while only 6.9% disagreed and strongly disagreed that illegal mining pollutes rivers, lakes, and the sea (Table 2). Slightly more than half (60.3%) of the respondents agreed and strongly agreed that humans can change nature to meet our daily needs (Table 2). Awareness concerning the need for EE was very high among the respondents. More than 83% of the respondents had undergone some form of EE in previous years, while about half had previously been involved in water management education (Table 2). Almost half (50.4%) and 46.2% of the respondents strongly agreed and agreed, respectively, that EE should be made compulsory in the school curriculum, while only 0.4% disagreed. All the respondents agreed and strongly agreed that EE is a valuable tool for solving environmental problems (Table 2).

Table 2

Awareness of water pollution prevention and conservation

ItemsSA
A
D
SD
Total
Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%
Open defecation pollutes rivers, lakes, and the sea 554 72.3 164 21.4 26 3.4 22 2.9 766 100 
Chemicals from farms pollute rivers, lakes, and the sea 476 62.1 232 30.3 39 5.1 19 2.5 766 100 
Illegal mining pollutes rivers, lakes, and the sea 479 62.5 234 30.6 34 4.4 19 2.5 766 100 
Humans have the right to change nature to meet our daily needs 165 21.5 297 38.8 235 30.7 69 766 100 
Environmental education is a handy tool for solving environmental problems 514 67.1 243 31.7 1.2 766 100 
I have undergone some form of environmental education 248 32.4 399 52.1 105 13.7 14 1.8 766 100 
I have previously been involved in a water management education programme 114 14.9 238 31.1 370 48.3 44 5.7 766 100 
Environmental education should be made compulsory in the school curriculum. 386 50.4 354 46.2 23 0.4 766 100 
The natural environment is very important and fragile 676 88.3 88 11.5 0.1 0.1 766 100 
Water is a very important natural resource 109 14.2 115 15 314 41.0 228 29.8 766 100 
Reducing water consumption is a way to protect the environment 257 33.5 362 47.3 118 15.4 29 3.8 766 100 
Saving water reflects civilization and good behaviour 78 10.2 225 29.4 312 40.7 151 19.7 766 100 
ItemsSA
A
D
SD
Total
Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%
Open defecation pollutes rivers, lakes, and the sea 554 72.3 164 21.4 26 3.4 22 2.9 766 100 
Chemicals from farms pollute rivers, lakes, and the sea 476 62.1 232 30.3 39 5.1 19 2.5 766 100 
Illegal mining pollutes rivers, lakes, and the sea 479 62.5 234 30.6 34 4.4 19 2.5 766 100 
Humans have the right to change nature to meet our daily needs 165 21.5 297 38.8 235 30.7 69 766 100 
Environmental education is a handy tool for solving environmental problems 514 67.1 243 31.7 1.2 766 100 
I have undergone some form of environmental education 248 32.4 399 52.1 105 13.7 14 1.8 766 100 
I have previously been involved in a water management education programme 114 14.9 238 31.1 370 48.3 44 5.7 766 100 
Environmental education should be made compulsory in the school curriculum. 386 50.4 354 46.2 23 0.4 766 100 
The natural environment is very important and fragile 676 88.3 88 11.5 0.1 0.1 766 100 
Water is a very important natural resource 109 14.2 115 15 314 41.0 228 29.8 766 100 
Reducing water consumption is a way to protect the environment 257 33.5 362 47.3 118 15.4 29 3.8 766 100 
Saving water reflects civilization and good behaviour 78 10.2 225 29.4 312 40.7 151 19.7 766 100 

The natural environment is crucial to almost all the respondents (99.8%), while less than 1% did not agree with the statement that the environment is important and fragile (Table 2). Just slightly above the average number of the respondents were aware and agreed strongly that water is an essential natural resource to man. About 80% of the respondents were aware and agreed that reducing water consumption is a way to protect the environment. In comparison, only about 20% of the respondents were unaware and did not agree that reducing water consumption is a way of protecting the environment. A low percentage of the respondents (39.6%) knew that saving water reflects civilization and good behaviour.

Attitude towards water pollution prevention and conservation

Most respondents' attitude towards reducing the water pollution problem was because it is terrible for the environment and impoverishes future generations. Most of the respondents (89%) did not support the prevention of water pollution. From Table 3, it can be seen that 18.4 and 43.3% of the respondents strongly agreed and agreed, respectively, to the statement that family members still pour their household waste in the gutters when it rains. Only 38.2% of the respondents did not pour household waste into the drainage when it rains. Not less than 98.4% of the respondents flush detergents, oil, paint, and fungicides through sinks or water closets in their homes, while less than 2% did not engage in such acts.

Table 3

Attitude towards water pollution prevention and conservation

ItemsSA
A
D
SD
Total
Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%
I support the cause to reduce the problem of water pollution because it is bad for the environment and future generations 16 2.1 63 8.2 237 30.9 450 58.8 766 100 
I/my family members pour our household waste in the gutters when it rains 141 18.4 332 43.3 177 23.1 116 15.1 766 100 
I flush detergents, oil, paint, and fungicides through sinks or water closets 485 63.3 269 35.1 10 1.3 0.3 766 100 
I leave the water running in the kitchen when washing and rinsing dishes 35 4.6 76 9.9 267 34.9 388 50.7 766 100 
I/my family members throw or drop litter at the shores of rivers and lakes if there are no waste collection bins or trash cans 244 31.9 344 44.9 149 19.5 29 3.8 766 100 
I have water-efficient toilets installed in my home 95 12.4 258 33.7 345 45 68 8.9 766 100 
I shower no more than five minutes each time I bathe 147 19.2 329 43 191 24.9 99 12.9 766 100 
I/my family use rain barrels to collect water for use when it rains 315 41.1 385 50.3 54 7.1 12 1.6 766 100 
ItemsSA
A
D
SD
Total
Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%
I support the cause to reduce the problem of water pollution because it is bad for the environment and future generations 16 2.1 63 8.2 237 30.9 450 58.8 766 100 
I/my family members pour our household waste in the gutters when it rains 141 18.4 332 43.3 177 23.1 116 15.1 766 100 
I flush detergents, oil, paint, and fungicides through sinks or water closets 485 63.3 269 35.1 10 1.3 0.3 766 100 
I leave the water running in the kitchen when washing and rinsing dishes 35 4.6 76 9.9 267 34.9 388 50.7 766 100 
I/my family members throw or drop litter at the shores of rivers and lakes if there are no waste collection bins or trash cans 244 31.9 344 44.9 149 19.5 29 3.8 766 100 
I have water-efficient toilets installed in my home 95 12.4 258 33.7 345 45 68 8.9 766 100 
I shower no more than five minutes each time I bathe 147 19.2 329 43 191 24.9 99 12.9 766 100 
I/my family use rain barrels to collect water for use when it rains 315 41.1 385 50.3 54 7.1 12 1.6 766 100 

The respondents had a good attitude towards water conservation. Very few respondents (14.5%) agreed that they leave the water running in the kitchen when washing and rinsing dishes. About 86% disagreed with leaving the water running in the kitchen when washing and rinsing dishes. They believed that the water tap was supposed to be closed. About three-fourth of the respondents and their family members did throw or drop litter at the shores of rivers and lakes if they did not have waste collection bins or trash cans around them. Only 25% of the respondents and their family members did not engage in such activity.

About 62% of the respondents shower no more than 5 min each time they bathe. Only about 38% of the respondents shower for more than 5 min. Almost all the respondents (91%) and their family members used rain barrels to collect water for use when it rains, while less than 10% of the respondents did not collect rainwater for use (Table 3).

Different age groups were involved in the survey. There was a significant difference in the level of awareness and attitude towards water pollution and conservation among the other age groups involved in the survey (Table 4). Table 5 shows that respondents' education level influences their level of awareness and attitude towards water pollution and conservation.

Table 4

Relationship between age group and awareness and attitude to water pollution and conservation

GroupsCountSumAverageVariance
765 1,632 2.133333 2.49267   
1.681818 765 1,522.805 1.990595 0.065725   
ANOVA
Source of variationSSdfMSFp-valueF crit
Between groups 7.793141 7.793141 6.09221 0.013687 3.847552 
Within groups 1,954.614 1,528 1.279198    
Total 1,962.407 1,529     
GroupsCountSumAverageVariance
765 1,632 2.133333 2.49267   
1.681818 765 1,522.805 1.990595 0.065725   
ANOVA
Source of variationSSdfMSFp-valueF crit
Between groups 7.793141 7.793141 6.09221 0.013687 3.847552 
Within groups 1,954.614 1,528 1.279198    
Total 1,962.407 1,529     
Table 5

Relationship between level of education and awareness and attitude to water pollution and conservation

GroupsCountSumAverageVariance
765 2,192 2.865359 2.915094   
1.681818 765 1,522.805 1.990595 0.065725   
ANOVA
Source of variationSSdfMSFp-valueF crit
Between groups 292.6939 292.6939 196.3849 4.5842 3.847552 
Within groups 2,277.346 1,528 1.49041    
Total 2,570.04 1,529     
GroupsCountSumAverageVariance
765 2,192 2.865359 2.915094   
1.681818 765 1,522.805 1.990595 0.065725   
ANOVA
Source of variationSSdfMSFp-valueF crit
Between groups 292.6939 292.6939 196.3849 4.5842 3.847552 
Within groups 2,277.346 1,528 1.49041    
Total 2,570.04 1,529     

The general findings of this study show that the level of awareness of water pollution was high among the respondents. This finding speaks to facts common in developing countries, where environmental pollution increases daily due to public environmental ignorance and intention to act (Nahar et al. 2021). The respondents knew that open defecation, mining, and chemicals from farms could lead to river, lake, and sea pollution (Zhou et al. 2022). EE should be made compulsory in the school curriculum, and it is a valuable tool for preventing water pollution and conservation. EE will help prevent water pollution and increase water conservation efforts among the young and the old. It will raise awareness of water pollution prevention strategies and improve people's attitudes towards water conservation (Ardoin et al. 2020; Karataş & Karataş 2023). The level of awareness concerning EE was very high among the respondents. EE is useful in solving environmental problems, especially water pollution and conservation (Ogueri et al. 2020). It can increase environmental knowledge and positive behaviour towards the environment. Proper EE, monitoring, regulation, and control can prevent water pollution (Kiraz et al. 2020). Most people still pour household waste inside drainages when it rains. The results also show that most people still leave their taps running while washing and rinsing dishes. The wrong attitude of throwing waste at the shores of rivers and lakes was still prevalent among people in the study area (Kalina et.al. 2022). The findings of the current study show a resemblance with other research. The findings of this study validate the findings of Boubonari et al. (2013), Al-Maliki et al. (2021), and Hammami et al. (2017) that strategies addressing deficiencies provide incentives for change and ensure governmental support and EE are needed to bridge the information gap and enhance opportunities to adopt pro-environmental behaviours. The results further strengthen the importance of EE in educating the people and community on the implications of water pollution and the need to work to abate the incidence of water pollution as a health hazard within the community (Boubonari et al. 2013; Hammami et al. 2017, Al-Maliki et al. 2021).

EE can increase awareness and understanding of water pollution prevention. It encourages individuals to adopt practices that conserve water as a vital environmental resource. Most respondents were aware of water pollution and prevention strategies; however, people's attitude towards water conservation was very poor. The age of people affects their level of awareness and attitude towards water pollution, prevention, and conservation. However, the level of education does not affect the level of awareness and attitude towards water pollution prevention and conservation in Nigeria. While most respondents knew the importance of water conservation, more work is needed to promote good attitudes and behaviour to prioritize and implement sustainable water usage practices.

The high level of awareness and negative attitudes towards actions that contribute to water pollution suggest that EE programmes should reinforce positive attitudes and behaviours related to water conservation and pollution prevention. The wrong attitude of dropping waste inside drainages and leaving the tap running while washing or rinsing dishes should not be encouraged. EE emphasizing water pollution prevention and conservation should be made compulsory in the school curriculum at all levels of education. In addition, there is a need for the Federal Ministry of Water Resource to provide regulations on household and company water conservation and enforce the same with penalties for non-compliance. Since EE has been found to promote increased awareness and a good attitude towards water pollution prevention and conservation, future research can explore the underlying factors contributing to the varying attitudes and behaviour towards water conservation.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Adedeji
O. E.
,
Jegede
D. E.
,
Abdulsalam
K. O.
,
Umeohia
U. E.
,
Ajayi
O. A.
, &
Iboyi
J. E.
2015
Effect of processing treatments on the proximate, functional and sensory properties of Soy-Sorghum-Roselle complementary food
.
British Journal of Applied Science and Technology
6
(6),
635
–643.
doi:10.9734/bjast/2015/14707
.
Al-Maliki
L. A.
,
Farhan
S. L.
,
Jasim
I. A.
,
Al-Mamoori
S. K.
&
Al-Ansari
N.
2021
Perceptions about water pollution among university students: A case study from Iraq
.
Cogent Engineering
8
,
1
.
doi:10.1080/23311916.2021.1895473
.
Ardoin
N. M.
,
Bowers
A. W.
&
Gaillard
E.
2020
Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review
.
Biological Conservation
241
,
108224
.
Avery
M.
,
2011
The Nigerian built environment challenges
. In:
Proceedings of the First National Built Environment Summit on Built Environment Disasters: For National Action Plan Nigerian Institute of International Affairs
,
February 8–10
(
Alabi
A. S.
&
Epelle
S.
, eds).
Nigerian Institute of Architects
,
Lagos
, pp.
185
196
.
Ayeni
A. O.
2017
Increasing Population, Urbanization and Climatic Factors in Lagos State, National Water Resources Institute (NWRI). 2019. Curriculum on Water Resources Management. Available from: https://www.nwri.gov.ng/resources/.
Boubonari
T.
,
Markos
A.
&
Kevrekidis
T.
2013
Greek pre-service teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and environmental behavior toward marine pollution
.
The Journal of Environmental Education
44
(
4
),
232
251
.
doi:10.1080/00958964.2013.785381\
.
Charles
S.
&
Daniel
T. B.
2011
The Failure of Environmental Education (And How We Can Fix It)
.
University of California Press
,
Berkeley, CA
.
EPA
2016
Green cities: Urban environmental solutions, global issues
.
An Electronic Journal of the US Department of State
5
(
1
),
1
39
.
Galadima
A.
,
Garba
Z. N.
,
Leke
L.
,
Almustapha
M. N.
&
Adam
I. K.
2011
Domestic water pollution among local communities in Nigeria – Causes and consequences
.
European Journal of Scientific Research
52
(
4
),
592
603
.
Hammami
M. B. A.
,
Mohammed
E. Q.
,
Hashem
A. M.
,
Al-Khafaji
M. A.
,
Alqahtani
F.
,
Alzaabi
S.
&
Dash
N.
2017
Survey on awareness and attitudes of secondary school students regarding plastic pollution: Implications for environmental education and public health in Sharjah city, UAE
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
24
(
25
),
20626
20633
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9625-x
.
Iwasaki
S.
2022
Effects of environmental education on young children's water-saving behaviours in Japan
.
Sustainability
14
,
3382
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063382
.
Karataş
A.
&
Karataş
E.
2023
Environmental education as a solution tool for the prevention of water pollution
.
Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences
3 (1),
61
70
.
Kiraz
A.
,
Antip
T. M.
&
Gündüz
Ş
.
2020
Contributing water pollution control through the use of selected instructional strategies amongst secondary school students
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
177
,
257
263
.
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25011
.
Lerh
I.
,
Grass
P.
&
John
D.
2011
Water and Health
.
McGraw-Hill Book Publication
,
USA
.
Mokitlane
L.
2018
A baseline study to evaluate the groundwater conditions and predict future impacts of mining at Matsopa Minerals. MSc dissertation, University of the Free State. http://hdl.handle.net/11660/8635
.
NEWSAN
2020
Society for Water and Sanitation. Available from: http://www.newsan.org.
Ogueri
D.
,
Bualert
S.
&
Chunkao
K.
2020
Environmental education as a tool in water quality management
.
International Journal of Management
11
,
1057
1066
.
doi:10.34218/IJM.11.9.2020.100
.
Oluwande
S. C.
2011
Effective survival measures against natural hazards in settled areas. In: Management of Environmental Problems and Hazards in Nigeria (H. C. Mba, Smart N. Uchegbu, C. A. Udeh & L. N. Muoghalu, eds). Routledge, Abingdon
.
Peter
K. R.
2013
The benefits of mainstreaming environmental education in the school curriculum
.
Research Journal in Organizational Psychology & Educational Studies
2
(
2
),
54
59
.
Sobowale
A.
,
Adewumi
J. K.
, &
Bamgboye
O. O.
2015
.
Tulchinsky
T. H.
&
Varavikova
E. A.
2014
Communicable diseases. In: The New Public Health, 3rd edn (T. H. Tulchinsky & E. A. Varavikova, eds.). Elsevier eBooks, pp. 149–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-415766-8.00004-5
.
WHO
2010
Health Effects of Water Pollution
.
Available from: http://www.girlshealth.gov/…/water/effecte.html (accessed 13 August 2022)
.
WHO
2011
Report on Technology for Water Supply and Sanitation in Developing Countries
.
Lewis Publication, London
.
WHO
2014
Water-Related Disease and Contaminants in Public Water
.
Available from: http://www.C,dCgov/health water/—/water— (accessed 16 August 2022)
.
Zhou
L.
,
Appiah
R.
,
Boadi
E. B.
,
Ayamba
E. C.
,
Larnyo
E.
&
Antwi
H. A.
2022
The impact of human activities on river pollution and health-related quality of life: Evidence from Ghana
.
Sustainability
14
(
20
),
13120
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).