Groundwater is the primary source of water for domestic and irrigation purposes in the peninsular region of the Bhagalpur and Khagaria districts of Bihar. Though this region is bounded by perennial rivers on three sides, the groundwater level is decreasing gradually because of over exploitation and misuse. In this study, spatial and temporal analyses of rainfall and groundwater levels for pre- and post-monsoon seasons from 1996 to 2020 have been carried out using GIS tools, graphical plots, and statistical methods of pattern recognition. The spatial analysis of rainfall shows less rainfall in the western region of the study area, whereas it shows heavy rainfall in the region near the Vikramshila Bridge. The temporal analysis of rainfall shows decreasing trend in the whole study area and the rate of decrease was 25.05 mm/year during 1996–2020. The results of the pre-monsoon groundwater levels analysis show decreasing trend in the majority of wells, and the rate of decrease varies from 0.005 to 0.102 m/year. By contrast, the post-monsoon groundwater levels showed an increasing trend varying from 0.005 to 0.083 m/year at wells located near the River Ganga, except at Maheshkhunt. Thus, there is a need for proper groundwater management for a sustainable future.

  • The study investigated the change in the patterns of rainfall and groundwater levels in a peninsular region formed by four rivers.

  • The study used GIS tools and graphical and statistical methods for spatio-temporal analysis.

  • The results showed a declining trend in rainfall and groundwater levels and their variation in space.

  • Based on this study, the authorities can initiate steps for groundwater management.

Groundwater is a valuable natural resource, which is generally available as fresh water, and it is used for domestic, industrial, and agricultural purposes (Mirdha et al. 2020; Ali et al. 2021). Many cities rely on the groundwater for daily uses of water (Boretti & Rosa 2019). Several agriculture-based countries depend on the groundwater for irrigation purposes. The rapid increase in population, urbanization, decreasing flora and fauna, and various other factors have affected the climate and rainfall patterns, which in turn put more stress over the groundwater and its potential in different regions across the world (Jan et al. 2007; Wakode et al. 2018). This stress is increasing day by day particularly in arid and semi-arid regions with more and more groundwater being extracted and ultimately resulting in a decline of groundwater levels (GWLs). The decreasing GWLs have drawn the attention of the world. Studies conducted by many researchers have reported the problem of declining GWLs (Patle et al. 2015;,Pathak & Dodamani 2019; Goswami & Rabha 2020; Halder et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2021;,Vousoughi 2022;,Ghosh & Bera 2023). In the Ardabil plains of Iran, significant decrease in the GWL was reported caused by the human activity over a period of 22 years. A concern was raised about the inaccuracy of long-term GWL records and its trend analysis for understanding the groundwater dynamics at agricultural scales (Le Brocque et al. 2018). A study conducted in the United Arab Emirates by Liaqat et al. (2021) had reported a decline in GWL due to an expansion in urban and agricultural areas.

India is an agricultural country and more than 70% of the population depends on agriculture according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The majority of irrigation is dependent on groundwater. In general, the decrease in rainfall results in a decrease of the available water for groundwater recharge. The GWL is declining due to the unlimited extraction and misuse of groundwater (Wakode et al. 2018). Sharma et al. (2022) conducted a study on environmental change and groundwater variability for south Bihar in the areas adjacent to the peninsular study region and reported an average increase of 0.5 °C in temperature during 1958–2019 with a deficit of surface and groundwater above 600 mm. Furthermore, monsoon rainfalls were highly unpredictable after 1990. Unscientific extraction of groundwater for domestic, agricultural, and industrial purposes by the 1.4 billion population has created an acute crisis for the Indian aquifers. Studies conducted by various researchers across different regions of India concluded that the GWL has declined (Thakur & Thomas 2011;,Patle et al. 2015;,Wakode et al. 2018;,Pathak & Dodamani 2019; Goswami & Rabha 2020; Halder et al. 2020). It may create a groundwater drought situation, which is a relatively newer concept for the Indian subcontinent (Pathak & Dodamani 2019).

Generally, groundwater is found at shallow depths between the plains of the Ganga and the Kosi rivers. The study area, the peninsular region of Bhagalpur and Khagaria districts of Bihar, is part of these plains. The agriculture is mostly dependent on groundwater in this area. Most of the farmers extract groundwater using diesel operated pumping sets, but there is no account of the number of pumps being operated. The absence of accounting for groundwater pumping leads to overexploitation, which has been identified as a prime reason for groundwater depletion across different regions (Thakur & Thomas 2011; Patle et al. 2015;,Wakode et al. 2018; Joshi et al. 2021;,Ghosh & Bera 2023). The blockwise groundwater resource assessment by the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB 2020) categorizes the entire area as ‘safe’ in groundwater resource. Based on the field visit made by the authors and the interaction with the local people of the study area, it was found that the GWL is going down year by year. Furthermore, local people reported that drinking water was available at shallow depths in all seasons a decade ago. However, during the last decade, deeper borings were required for groundwater extraction due to the failure of pre-existing shallow boring or due to the requirement of additional efforts to pump out water during the summer season, although it is available at shallow depths during the monsoon and post monsoon. This observation shows that the GWL decreases in the pre-monsoon season and is recharged during the monsoon season. Thus, it is important to study the variation of the rainfall and GWL to understand the problem of GWL depletion.

Trend analysis methods vary from simple linear regression to more enhanced parametric and non-parametric methods (Chen et al. 2007). Though, linear regression is the simplest method, but there is lack of accuracy in non-linear trend assessment of groundwater (Shamsudduha et al. 2009). Various other methods such as stochastic analysis, non-parametric Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, non-parametric time series decomposition technique, etc., have been used by researchers for trend detection of GWLs in different regions in the past (Shamsudduha et al. 2009). The non-parametric Mann–Kendall test (M–K test) has become the most popular method among researchers and is extensively used to identify trends in time series data. Mann (1945) formulated it as a non-parametric test to detect the trend. Later, Kendall (1975) introduced it as a test statistic. It compares the relative magnitude of the sample data (Gilbert 1987). The advantage of this test is that the data need not follow any particular probability distribution. Moreover, a common value less than the smallest value in the data set may be used to incorporate non-detected data (Kendall 1975). Panda et al. (2012) observed a large number of declining trends in GWLs across Gujarat (India) using the non-parametric M–K test. Thakur & Thomas (2011) determined the seasonal GWL trends using the Kendall rank correlation along with the parametric linear regression test in the Sagar district of India. Several other researchers have successfully applied this method and reported that the non-parametric approach of M–K test can be used for the trend analysis of GWLs (Shadmani et al. 2012; Vousoughi et al. 2012; Das et al. 2020; Aditya et al. 2021; Citakoglu & Minarecioglu 2021; Frollini et al. 2021).

The present study focuses on the area where GWL is declining even though it is bounded by perennial rivers along three sides. Although the study area may not have an acute groundwater crisis at present, current trends may lead to an acute shortage of groundwater in future, if timely attention is not paid toward it. Surface water has already been suffering from the crisis. Hence, there is a need to conduct a study for the analysis of rainfall and GWL in the study area, so that necessary measures can be taken up for the same. Because no such study has been carried out in particular for this study area earlier, the main objective of this study is to investigate the changing pattern of rainfall and GWLs in space and time using the spatial analysis tools of ArcGIS, graphical plots, and statistical methods such as the M–K test and Sen's slope estimator.

Study area

The study area, shown in Figure 1, is located in Bihar, which is the 12th largest state of India. It covers the part of the districts of Bhagalpur and Khagaria in Bihar. It lies between 86°35′E to 87°15′E longitudes and 25°16′N to 25°33′N latitudes covering a total area of 1,157 km2 with a perimeter of 216 km. It is a peninsula created by four rivers, namely, the Ganga in the south and east, the Kosi in the north, and the Baghmati and the Budhi Gandak in the west side. The River Ganga flows from west to east forming a part of the western boundary, the entire southern boundary, and continues to flow along the entire eastern boundary of the study area. The River Kosi flows from north-west to the eastern side forming the northern boundary. The Rivers Ganga and the Kosi form a confluence on the downstream side of the Kursela Bridge located at the north–east corner of the study area. In the west–south direction, the River Budhi Gandak flows toward the south forming a small boundary and confluences with the River Ganga near the Gogri block. The River Baghmati forms a small boundary in the north-west side and confluences with the River Kosi at the upstream side of B. P. Mandal Bridge on the Kosi River. A natural drain named Kasraiya Dhaar passes through the localities Chedhabanni and Karua Mor. It lies between the rivers Budhi Gandak and the Baghmati.
Figure 1

Location map of the study area.

Figure 1

Location map of the study area.

Close modal
It has good connectivity with the rest of the country through National Highway-31 and the Barauni–Katihar main railway line, running in the east-west direction almost through the middle of the study area over the ridge line. Slopes are in the transverse direction along both sides of this ridge line. The digital elevation model (SRTM DEM 30 m × 30 m, USGS) of the study area is shown in Figure 2. The elevation ranges from 10 to 56 m above the mean sea level. The majority of the higher elevation areas lie in the west region of the study area.
Figure 2

Digital elevation model of the study area.

Figure 2

Digital elevation model of the study area.

Close modal

As per the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the climate is hot and humid during the summer season, with the maximum temperature of 41 °C at some urban locations, and very cold during the winter season, with the minimum temperature of 12 °C in diara areas. The study area receives good amount of annual rainfall ranging from 1,300 to 1,400 mm on an average and more than 80% of the annual rainfall occurs during the monsoon (June to September). However, this rainfall is not evenly distributed in space as some parts receive more and some parts receive less rainfall. The variation in rainfall leads to a situation of varying groundwater recharge (Panda et al. 2012;,Halder et al. 2020). The areas at lower elevation located near the rivers experience flood during monsoons. Agriculture is the prime occupation in this area and almost the entire irrigation is dependent on groundwater by pumping from bore wells. The decreasing level of groundwater is a reason for the failure of the bore wells as reported by the farmers and dwellers at several locations. The cost of irrigation has also increased because of the decreasing level of groundwater, and thereby, increasing the overall cost of farming. The study area has very fertile alluvial soil. The top soil is mostly clayey loam with sand deposits at around 1 m depth. Crops like wheat, maize, gram, and mustard are widely grown in this area. The agricultural lands close to the rivers have heavy silt deposits due to floods and thus make the land unsuitable for normal cropping. However, the Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) in Khagaria organizes training programs (Action Plan 2018-19) to grow cucurbits such as watermelon and pointed gourd in the silty conditions of the area and farmers are practicing this.

The surface water has been adversely affected in the study area due to pollution and encroachment. Although groundwater storage in the study area has not reached a crisis situation, prompt action is required for conservation and management of this vital resource. In order to plan an appropriate action, it is required to investigate the patterns of the rainfall and GWLs in the study area.

It was observed during the field visits that groundwater availability varied at different locations during different times of the year. Therefore, the present study focuses on spatial and temporal variations along with the trend analysis of rainfall and GWLs from the year 1996 to 2020. The study area has five rain gauge stations maintained in its proximity by the IMD, namely, Bhagalpur, Kahalgaon, Kursela, Khagaria, and Munger, as shown in Figure 3. However, the point rainfall data for the period 1996–2020 were not available at these stations. Therefore, gridded daily rainfall data with grid size 0.25° × 0.25° at a high resolution were collected from the IMD, Pune, from the year 1996 to 2020 (Pai et al. 2014). These rainfall data were processed and used for this study.
Figure 3

Rain gauge and groundwater well stations.

Figure 3

Rain gauge and groundwater well stations.

Close modal

The Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) has about 25,000 dedicated stations for monitoring GWLs across India, which are known as Hydrograph Network Stations (HNS). A total of 10 such HNS located in the study area are shown in Figure 3. The details of the CGWB HNS obtained from the India-Water Resource Information System (India-WRIS) portal of the Government of India are presented in Table 1 (www.indiawris.gov.in).

Table 1

Details of the observation wells

HNS locationAbbreviationLongitudeLatitudeReduced level of HNS ground surface (m)Well type
Madrauni Chowk Mad 87.1711 25.3975 34.96 Drilled Well 
Naugachia Nau 87.0875 25.4042 33.88 Drilled Well 
Bihpur Bih 86.9417 25.3917 37.47 Drilled Well 
Marwa Mar 86.9222 25.3989 38.81 Drilled Well 
Mohaddipur Moh 86.7461 25.3919 44.85 Drilled Well 
Dewri Dew 86.7136 25.3628 40.00 Drilled Well 
Gandhinagar Gan 86.6650 25.4461 43.24 Drilled Well 
Jamalpur Jam 86.6417 25.4292 41.04 Drilled Well 
Maheshkhunt Mah 86.6294 25.4586 38.92 Drilled Well 
Lohiya Chowk Loh 86.5989 25.4806 41.00 Drilled Well 
HNS locationAbbreviationLongitudeLatitudeReduced level of HNS ground surface (m)Well type
Madrauni Chowk Mad 87.1711 25.3975 34.96 Drilled Well 
Naugachia Nau 87.0875 25.4042 33.88 Drilled Well 
Bihpur Bih 86.9417 25.3917 37.47 Drilled Well 
Marwa Mar 86.9222 25.3989 38.81 Drilled Well 
Mohaddipur Moh 86.7461 25.3919 44.85 Drilled Well 
Dewri Dew 86.7136 25.3628 40.00 Drilled Well 
Gandhinagar Gan 86.6650 25.4461 43.24 Drilled Well 
Jamalpur Jam 86.6417 25.4292 41.04 Drilled Well 
Maheshkhunt Mah 86.6294 25.4586 38.92 Drilled Well 
Lohiya Chowk Loh 86.5989 25.4806 41.00 Drilled Well 

Pre-monsoon (May) and post-monsoon (November) GWLs (mbgl) from the year 1996 to 2020 for all stations obtained from the India-WRIS portal were used. The GWLs data (mbgl) obtained had many values missing for different durations at different stations. The GWLs data for pre- and post-monsoons for each year were processed and maps were prepared using the Kriging technique (Sakizadeh et al. 2019; Hasan et al. 2021). Missing data were filled using the interpolation method.

The peninsular region of Bhagalpur and Khagaria districts has been divided into three sub-parts depending upon the location of the wells, viz. eastern part, central part, and western part, to understand and investigate the changing pattern of rainfall and GWLs in space and time. The first sub-area located in the eastern part consists of the Madrauni Chowk and Naugachia observation wells, the second sub-area located in the central part contains the Bihpur and Marwa observation wells, and the third sub-area located in the western part contains the remaining observation wells, which are nearer to each other and fall under Khagaria district.

The M–K (Mann 1945; Kendall 1975; Gilbert, 1987) test for trend analysis and Sen's slope estimator (Sen 1968) to detect the slope of trend line have been used for rainfall and GWLs. Non-parametric methods are easier to use due to lesser assumptions as compared to the parametric approaches (Esterby 1996). This makes the M–K test advantageous to use for studies where some data are missing. The M–K test is a statistical assessment of a monotonic trend (decreasing or increasing) in the test variable over time. However, the trend may or may not be linear. The M–K test is an exploratory method for identification of the trends in data sets having significant changes and does not substitute visual examination of time series plots (Hirsch et al. 1982).

The M–K test has been explained in various literatures, and hence, a description is not repeated here. Gilbert (1987) can be referred for the mathematical procedure to conduct the M–K test. Apart from the statistical parameters mentioned in the mathematical procedure, Kendall's Tau (τ) can be computed for direction of trend. The value of τ varies between −1 to +1 and a positive value shows an increasing trend while a negative value shows a decreasing trend. Sen (1968) proposed a method to calculate the slope of a time series. In simple words, the slope represents the rate at which a time series data increase or decrease based on the positive or negative values of the slope. The method gives the magnitude of the trend for a sample size of N, which can be expresses as
(1)
where aj and ak are data values at times j and k (j > k), respectively. The median of the values from Qi to  QN is represented as Sen's slope estimation.

, if N is odd and , if N is even. A positive value of  Qi indicates an increasing trend in time series data whereas a negative value indicates a decreasing trend.

Rainfall analysis

The rainfall variation in space and time has been studied. The 25-year average annual rainfall data at each station were used to plot the spatial variation map using the Kriging technique in ArcGIS. Kriging was preferred over the deterministic methods in ArcGIS as it determines the rainfall values at unknown points based on spatial correlation between the areas of similar characteristics in close proximity to each other. It is a geo-statistical method that yields précised results with a greater number of sample data points (Webster & Oliver 2007). The rainfall at any particular part of the study area is dependent on the rainfall at nearest stations. The flowchart of the methodology for obtaining the rainfall variation using the Kriging technique is presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Flowchart of method for obtaining rainfall map using the Kriging technique in ArcGIS.

Figure 4

Flowchart of method for obtaining rainfall map using the Kriging technique in ArcGIS.

Close modal
The spatial variation of the annual average rainfall is presented in Figure 5. The annual average rainfall varied from 1,259.5 to 1,854.7 mm in space with lower values of rainfall in the western part and higher values mainly in the central and eastern parts. The maximum average annual rainfall was received by the wedge-shaped area close to the Vikramshila Bridge, Bhagalpur, during the period of study. The rainfall variation over the study area gives an insight of groundwater recharge that may have followed a similar pattern, i.e. less amount of water may have been available for recharge of aquifers in the west direction as compared with the aquifers in the east direction. Figure 6 presents the time series of the annual rainfall along with the trend line to study the temporal variation. The annual rainfall was the maximum in the year 1999 and the minimum in the year 2010. The trend line shows that there has been a decrease in the annual precipitation received in the study area over the period of 25 years.
Figure 5

Spatial variation of average annual rainfall during 1996–2020.

Figure 5

Spatial variation of average annual rainfall during 1996–2020.

Close modal
Figure 6

Temporal variation of annual rainfall with trend line in the study area.

Figure 6

Temporal variation of annual rainfall with trend line in the study area.

Close modal

M–K and Sen's slope tests were also performed on the annual rainfall data to identify the behavior of the rainfall trend during 1996–2020. The results of M–K tests are summarized in Table 2. The probability, P-value, at 5% significance level was found to be 0.0019 along with τ-value of −0.447. Furthermore, the slope value was computed to be −25.049 from Sen's slope test. As the P-value was less than 0.05 and the τ-value was negative, it can be concluded that the annual rainfall had a significant decreasing trend over the study area. The rate of decrease in rainfall has been 25.049 mm/year during the period of study. Similar results were indicated from the time series plot along with trend line in Figure 6. The decreasing trend indicates a possible future deficit in rainfall.

Table 2

M–K and Sen's slope test for annual rainfall

P-valueτ-valueSen's slopeInterpretation
0.0019 −0.447 −25.049 Significant decreasing trend 
P-valueτ-valueSen's slopeInterpretation
0.0019 −0.447 −25.049 Significant decreasing trend 

From the above analysis, it is found that the annual rainfall in the study area varied in space as well as in time during the period of 25 years. During field visits, it was observed that urbanization was more rapid in the study area due to the increased connectivity and business opportunities, which might have affected the vegetation cover. The decrease in vegetation cover disturbs the water cycle, which leads to reduction in rainfall in a region. The declining trend of rainfall may also be due to the global climate change impact; however, a detailed investigation is required to establish this for the study area.

GWL analysis

The GWLs data for the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons obtained from the CGWB were investigated for the variation in time and space. The year-wise spatial variation maps for the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWLs (mbgl) were prepared from the year 1996 to 2020 using the Kriging technique (Sinha et al. 2018) and presented in Figure 7(a) and 7(b), respectively. The methods to obtain these maps were the same as shown in Figure 4 earlier.
Figure 7

(a) Spatial variation of GWLs during pre-monsoon season and (b) spatial variation of GWLs during post-monsoon season.

Figure 7

(a) Spatial variation of GWLs during pre-monsoon season and (b) spatial variation of GWLs during post-monsoon season.

Close modal

Pre-monsoon GWL varied from 1.63 to 10.67 m (bgl) over the whole study period. It can be noted that the GWL in pre-monsoon was very deep in the year 2014, whereas it was shallow in the year 1998. Further, it can be noted that the decrease in pre-monsoon GWL with time in the central and eastern parts was more than in the western part. This may be due to a decrease in the rainfall in these parts and also due to the increase in the unlimited extraction of groundwater in the pre-monsoon season for different purposes.

Post-monsoon GWL varied from 0.75 to 9.13 m (bgl). Again, it can be observed from Figure 7(b) that the GWL was deeper in the years 2010 and 2012, whereas it was shallower in the years 2013 and 2019. It can be noted that the annual rainfall was less in the year 2010 and relatively more in the year 2019, consequently, the groundwater recharge might have been lesser in the years 2010 and 2012 whereas more in the years 2013 and 2019. Further, it can be noted that the GWL in the post-monsoon season was shallower in the eastern part as compared with the other parts.

The time series of pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWLs were plotted for all the stations with the graphical representation of the trend as shown in Figure 8. An attempt was made to observe the behavior of the GWLs by visualizing the trend line. The trend line of the pre-monsoon GWL was found to be decreasing with a relatively steeper slope as compared with the post-monsoon trend at the Madrauni Chowk and Naugachia (eastern part), which indicates there were more declines during the pre-monsoon season. This might have been due to more extraction of groundwater in the eastern part. At Bihpur and Marwa, the GWL in the pre-monsoon season had a decreasing trend whereas a slight decreasing trend was observed at Bihpur and a slight increasing trend was observed at Marwa during the post-monsoon season. This might have been due to more rainfall in the central part. The GWL at Mohaddipur had a decreasing trend in the pre-monsoon season whereas the trend line slope appeared to be constant during the post-monsoon season. The GWL at Dewri had an increasing trend in the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons. The pre-monsoon GWL at Jamalpur had an increasing trend whereas it had a more or less constant slope in the post-monsoon season. The GWL at Gandhinagar had a decreasing trend in the pre-monsoon season whereas it had an increasing trend during the post-monsoon season. The trend lines for both the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWLs were more or less flat, i.e. they did not show any trend at Maheshkhunt and Lohiya Chowk.
Figure 8

Temporal variation of pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWLs with trend line: (a) Madrauni Chowk, (b) Naugachia, (c) Bihpur, (d) Marwa, (e) Mohaddipur, (f) Dewri, (g) Gandhinagar, (h) Jamalpur, (i) Maheshkhunt, and (j) Lohiya Chowk.

Figure 8

Temporal variation of pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWLs with trend line: (a) Madrauni Chowk, (b) Naugachia, (c) Bihpur, (d) Marwa, (e) Mohaddipur, (f) Dewri, (g) Gandhinagar, (h) Jamalpur, (i) Maheshkhunt, and (j) Lohiya Chowk.

Close modal

M–K and Sen's slope tests have also been carried out for the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWLs of each station and the results are presented in Table 3. The statistical parameters P-value, τ-value, and Sen's slope have similar meanings as described for Table 2.

Table 3

M–K and Sen's slope test for GWLs in pre- and post-monsoon seasons

StationP-value
τ-value
Sen's slope
Trend interpretation
Pre-MonPost-MonPre-MonPost-MonPre-MonPost-MonPre-MonPost-Mon
Mad 0.065 0.107 0.267 0.233 0.047 0.026 Ins Inc Ins Inc 
Nau 0.000 0.038 0.606 0.300 0.076 0.034 Sig Inc Sig Inc 
Bih 0.002 0.400 0.453 −0.124 0.102 −0.005 Sig Inc Ins Dec 
Mar 0.834 0.002 −0.033 −0.447 −0.005 −0.038 Ins Dec Sig Dec 
Moh 0.008 0.657 0.380 0.067 0.083 0.016 Sig Inc Ins Inc 
Dew 0.191 0.004 −0.190 −0.413 −0.064 −0.083 Ins Dec Sig Dec 
Gan 0.006 0.013 0.393 −0.357 0.051 −0.070 Sig Inc Sig Dec 
Jam 0.102 0.726 −0.237 −0.053 −0.056 −0.015 Ins Dec Ins Dec 
Mah 0.907 0.607 −0.020 0.077 −0.005 0.016 Ins Dec Ins Inc 
Loh 0.154 0.441 0.208 −0.113 0.005 −0.028 Ins Inc Ins Dec 
StationP-value
τ-value
Sen's slope
Trend interpretation
Pre-MonPost-MonPre-MonPost-MonPre-MonPost-MonPre-MonPost-Mon
Mad 0.065 0.107 0.267 0.233 0.047 0.026 Ins Inc Ins Inc 
Nau 0.000 0.038 0.606 0.300 0.076 0.034 Sig Inc Sig Inc 
Bih 0.002 0.400 0.453 −0.124 0.102 −0.005 Sig Inc Ins Dec 
Mar 0.834 0.002 −0.033 −0.447 −0.005 −0.038 Ins Dec Sig Dec 
Moh 0.008 0.657 0.380 0.067 0.083 0.016 Sig Inc Ins Inc 
Dew 0.191 0.004 −0.190 −0.413 −0.064 −0.083 Ins Dec Sig Dec 
Gan 0.006 0.013 0.393 −0.357 0.051 −0.070 Sig Inc Sig Dec 
Jam 0.102 0.726 −0.237 −0.053 −0.056 −0.015 Ins Dec Ins Dec 
Mah 0.907 0.607 −0.020 0.077 −0.005 0.016 Ins Dec Ins Inc 
Loh 0.154 0.441 0.208 −0.113 0.005 −0.028 Ins Inc Ins Dec 

Pre-Mon, pre-monsoon; Post-Mon, post-monsoon; Sig, significant; Ins, insignificant; Inc, increasing; Dec, decreasing.

The test results showed insignificant increasing trend at Madrauni Chowk in both the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons with P-value greater than 0.05 and positive values of τ and Sen's slope. It means the depth to the GWL was increasing, and hence, the GWL was decreasing. The same trend was shown by the graphical trend line in Figure 8(a) for Madrauni Chowk. For Naugachia, a significant increasing trend in depth to GWL was observed in the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons with a P-value less than 0.05 and positive values of τ and Sen's slope. This implies a decline in GWL in both the seasons. The depth to GWL (mbgl) had a significantly increasing trend (P < 0.05, τ: +ve) at Bihpur in the pre-monsoon season, which means that the GWL was declining in the pre-monsoon season. However, an insignificant decreasing trend (P > 0.05) was observed in the post-monsoon season depth to GWL with negative τ-value and Sen's slope. This implies the GWL was increasing. A similar trend was observed from the trend line behavior as shown in Figure 8(c) for Bihpur. At Marwa, the results indicated an insignificant decreasing trend in depth to GWL of the pre-monsoon season and a significant decreasing trend in the post-monsoon season. This implies the GWLs were increasing. A similar result was observed from graphical trend analysis in the post-monsoon season, but it differed in the pre-monsoon season. In the Khagaria district, all the six observation wells (Mohaddipur, Dewri, Gandhinagar, Jamalpur, Maheshkhunt, and Lohiya Chowk) were having similar trends as observed in their graphical trend analysis above. Dewri and Jamalpur had a increasing trend of GWL in both the seasons whereas others had the same pattern as in the graphical trend analysis.

It can be observed that the trend lines of GWL in the pre-monsoon season had a decline or a nearly constant slope value at all the well locations except at Jamalpur and Dewri. During the post-monsoon season, GWLs at all the wells had either an increasing or a nearly constant slope value of trend except at Madrauni chowk and Naugachia located in the eastern part of the study area, where it was decreasing. From the results, it was observed that the majority of stations are affected by decline in GWL in the pre-monsoon season. From the field visit experience, it was drawn that the variation in groundwater may be mainly attributed to overextraction of groundwater for irrigation as the flood irrigation method is most commonly practiced in the study area. Many pumping-set owners make their livelihood by charging farmers at per hour basis for irrigation. In order to make more money, there is a tendency to continue pumping even after the required irrigation has been done. Further, urbanization and concrete flooring of courtyards has also affected the GWLs in the majority of the parts as they hamper the recharge process. The wells situated in the south-west side of the study area are nearer to the River Ganga. These locations are to the south of the ridge line, i.e. NH 31, at varying distances, so there might be a possibility of river–aquifer interaction. Through field visits, it was observed that different parts of the study area are going through urbanization due to the developmental activities in the last decades. The urbanization in the eastern part has been more rapid. Therefore, the human activities might have increased the groundwater extraction and also affected the recharge to groundwater, which is also reflected in the post-monsoon GWLs.

The areas in south of the study area on the other bank of the River Ganga have become water scarce due to unaccounted overexploitation of groundwater and poor recharge. Therefore, it would be wiser for the authorities to consider the situation as alarming and necessary measures should be initiated for the proper use and management of groundwater so as to preserve this valuable resource.

Effect of monsoon rainfall on groundwater

The station-wise immediate effect of monsoon rainfall on post-monsoon GWLs was studied to find out the correlation between the two. The average monsoon rainfall over the sub-areas were computed and used for this purpose. The time series of GWL in the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon periods have been plotted with the bar chart for the average monsoon rainfall and presented in Figure 9.
Figure 9

Pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWL vs. monsoon rainfall: (a) Madrauni Chowk, (b) Naugachia, (c) Bihpur, (d) Marwa, (e) Mohaddipur, (f) Dewri, (g) Gandhinagar, (h) Jamalpur, (i) Maheshkhunt, and (j) Lohiya Chowk.

Figure 9

Pre-monsoon and post-monsoon GWL vs. monsoon rainfall: (a) Madrauni Chowk, (b) Naugachia, (c) Bihpur, (d) Marwa, (e) Mohaddipur, (f) Dewri, (g) Gandhinagar, (h) Jamalpur, (i) Maheshkhunt, and (j) Lohiya Chowk.

Close modal

It was observed that there was no significant effect of the monsoon rainfall on the post-monsoon GWL. This means that there was no effect on recharge from the rainfall alone, rather it might have been due to the river–aquifer interactions. It can be observed that the post-monsoon GWLs in the study area did not completely follow the monsoon rainfall trend.

Since the graphical plots did not show any concrete effect of monsoon rainfall on the post-monsoon GWL, the post-monsoon GWL and monsoon rainfall were further checked to confirm any statistical correlation. The statistical correlation coefficient values are presented in Table 4.

Table 4

Coefficient of correlation values between monsoon rainfall and post-monsoon GWL

StationMadNauBihMarMohDewGanJamMahLoh
Monsoon rainfall −0.38 −0.35 −0.02 0.33 −0.16 0.31 0.33 −0.36 −0.18 0.11 
StationMadNauBihMarMohDewGanJamMahLoh
Monsoon rainfall −0.38 −0.35 −0.02 0.33 −0.16 0.31 0.33 −0.36 −0.18 0.11 

Table 4 reveals that there was very weak correlation between the post-monsoon GWL and monsoon rainfall during the period of study, which means that the fluctuations in the post-monsoon GWLs were not due to monsoon rainfall alone as observed from the graphical plots.

The changing land-use pattern and concreting would have increased the runoff and thereby decreased the amount of available water for groundwater recharge. Therefore, this could be a reason for the post-monsoon GWL not exactly matching the monsoon rainfall trend. Since the groundwater recharge is not influenced by monsoon rainfall alone; it can be concluded that the above results may also be due to river–aquifer interaction as the study area is bounded by rivers from three sides. Further research is required to find out more about this possible effect.

The peninsular region of Bhagalpur and Khagaria districts has been divided into three parts, viz. eastern, central, and western parts, to understand and investigate the changing pattern of rainfall and GWLs in space and time. Spatial and temporal variations of annual rainfall and the pre- and post-monsoon GWLs in the peninsular region of Bhagalpur and Khagaria districts during 1996–2020 have been analyzed using spatial analysis tools, graphical plots, and the M–K test with Sen's slope estimator. It was found that the average annual rainfall over the period of 25 years (1996–2020) has remained fair, but it has spatial and temporal variations. The western part of the study area receives lesser rainfall compared with the central and eastern parts, with higher rainfall in the area near to the Vikramshila Bridge in the eastern part. Trend analysis showed a decreasing trend of rainfall in the whole study area and the rate of decease was 25.049 mm/year during the period of study. The pre-monsoon GWL had a decreasing trend at a majority of the wells and rate of decrease was varying from 0.005 to 0.102 m/year over the whole study area whereas the post-monsoon GWL shows an increasing trend with an increasing rate varying from 0.005 to 0.083 m/year in the wells, which are located nearer to the River Ganga except Maheshkhunt. The monsoon rainfall has a slight effect on the post-monsoon GWL. Thus, it can be concluded that the rainfall and groundwater are varying spatially as well as temporally in the peninsular region with a decreasing trend in both. Based upon the findings of this study, future studies can be carried out for the groundwater potential assessment and the river–aquifer interaction.

Finally, it is recommended that appropriate measures, including awareness against overexploitation and misuse of water, training to harvest rainwater in households, encouraging adaptation to high-efficiency modern irrigation systems, and keeping a record of borings at households and agricultural lands through local governing bodies at village levels may be taken up. These measures will certainly contribute to prevent any future water stress situations.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Action Plan 2018–19, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Khagaria. Available from: https://khagaria.kvk4.in/
Aditya
F.
,
Gusmayanti
E.
&
Sudrajat
J.
2021
Rainfall trend analysis using Mann-Kendall and Sen's slope estimator test in West Kalimantan. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 893 (012006)
. In:
2nd International Conference on Tropical Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences
,
23–25 March
.
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/893/1/012006
.
Ali
S.
,
Liu
D.
,
Fu
Q.
,
Chemma
M. J. M.
,
Pham
Q. B.
,
Rahaman
M. M.
,
Dang
T. D.
&
Anh
D. T.
2021.
Improving the resolution of GRACE data for spatio-temporal groundwater storage assessment
.
Remote Sensing
13
(
17
),
3513
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173513
.
Boretti
A.
&
Rosa
L.
2019
Reassessing the projections of the world water development report
.
NPJ Clean Water
2
(
15
).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-019-0039-9.
CGWB 2020 Block Wise Ground Water Resource Assessment-2020.
http://cgwb.gov.in/cgwbpnm/public/uploads/documents/1686115196211680191file.pdf.
Chen
H.
,
Guoa
S.
,
Xu
C.-Y.
&
Singh
V. P.
2007.
Historical temporal trends of hydro-climatic variables and runoff response to climate variability and their relevance in water resource management in the Hanjiang Basin
.
Journal of Hydrology
344
(
3–4
),
171
184
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.034
.
Citakoglu
H.
&
Minarecioglu
N.
2021
Trend analysis and change point determination for hydro-meteorological and groundwater data of Kizilirmak Basin
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
145
,
1275
1292
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03696-9
.
Das
J.
,
Sakiur Rahman
A. T. S.
,
Mandal
T.
&
Saha
P.
2020
Exploring driving forces of large-scale unsustainable groundwater development for irrigation in lower Ganga river basin in India
.
Environment, Development and Sustainability
23
,
7289
7309
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00917-5
.
Esterby
S. R.
1996
Review of methods for the detection and estimation of trends with emphasis on water quality applications
.
Hydrological Processes
10
(
2
),
127
149
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199602)10:2 < 127::AID-HYP354 > 3.0.CO;2-8
.
Frollini
E.
,
Preziosi
E.
,
Calace
N.
,
Guerra
M.
,
Guyennon
N.
,
Marcaccio
M.
,
Menichetti
S.
,
Romano
E.
&
Ghergo
S.
2021.
Groundwater quality trend and trend reversal assessmentin the European water framework directive context: An examplewith nitrates in Italy
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
28
,
22092
22104
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11998-0
.
Ghosh
A.
&
Bera
B.
2023
Estimation of groundwater level and storage changes using innovative trend analysis (ITA). GRACE data and google earth engine (GEE)
.
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
23
,
101003
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.101003
.
Gilbert
R. O.
1987.
Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring
.
Van Nostrand Reinhold
,
New York, NY, USA
.
Goswami
M.
&
Rabha
D.
2020
Trend analysis of ground-water levels and rainfall to assess sustainability of groundwater in Kamrup Metropolitan District of Assam in Northeast India. Available from: https://www.iitr.ac.in/rwc2020/pdf/papers/RWC_12_Dolly_R_et_al.pdf.
Hasan
K.
,
Paul
S.
,
Chy
T. J.
&
Antipova
A.
2021
Analysis of groundwater table variability and trend using ordinary kriging: The case study of Sylhet, Bangladesh
.
Applied Water Science
11
(
120
),
2021
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01454-w
.
Hirsch
R. M.
,
Slack
J. R.
&
Smith
R. A.
1982
Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data
.
Water Resources Research
18
(
1
),
107
121
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i001p00107
.
Jan
C. D.
,
Chen
T. H.
&
Lo
W. C.
2007
Effects of rainfall intensity and distribution on groundwater level fluctuations
.
Journal of Hydrology
332
(
3–4
),
348
360
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.010
.
Joshi
S. K.
,
Gupta
S.
,
Sinha
R.
,
Densmore
A. L.
,
Rai
S. P.
,
Shekhar
S.
,
Mason
P. J.
&
Dijk
W. M.
2021
Strongly heterogeneous patterns of groundwater depletion in Northwestern India
.
Journal of Hydrology
598
,
126492
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126492
.
Kendall
M. G.
1975.
Rank Correlation Methods
. 4th edn.
Charles Griffin
,
London, UK
.
Le Brocque
A. F.
,
Kath
J.
&
Reardon-Smith
K.
2018.
Chronic groundwater decline: A multi-decadal analysis of groundwater trends under extreme climate cycles
.
Journal of Hydrology
561
,
976
986
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.059
.
Liaqat
M. U.
,
Mohamed
M. M.
,
Chowdhury
R.
,
Elmahdy
S. I.
,
Khan
Q.
&
Ansari
R
.
2021
.
Impact of land use/land cover changes on groundwater resources in Al Ain region of the United Arab Emirates using remote sensing and GIS techniques
.
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
14
,
100587
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100587
Mann
H. B.
1945
Nonparametric tests against trend
.
Econometrica
13
(
4
),
245
259
.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187
.
Mirdha
G. C.
,
Hossain
M. M.
,
Salah Uddin
M.
&
Masud
M. S.
2020
Study of availability of groundwater resources in selangor state of Malaysia for an efficient planning and management of water resources
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
11
,
4
.
doi: 10.2166/wcc.2019.043
.
Panda
D.
,
Mishra
A.
&
Kumar
A.
2012.
Quantification of trends in groundwater levels of Gujarat in western India
.
Hydrological Sciences Journal
57
(
7
),
1
12
.
doi: 10.1080/02626667.2012.705845
.
Pathak
A. A.
&
Dodamani
B. M.
2019
Trend analysis of groundwater levels and assessment of regional groundwater drought:Ghataprabha river basin, India
.
Natural Resources Research
28
,
631
643
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9417-0
.
Patle
G. T.
,
Singh
D. K.
,
Sarangi
A.
,
Rai
A.
,
Khanna
M.
&
Sahoo
R. N.
2015
Time series analysis of groundwater levels and projection of future trend
.
JournalGeological Society of India
85
,
232
242
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-015-0209-4
.
Sakizadeh
M.
,
Mohamed
M. M. A.
&
Klammler
H.
2019
Trend analysis and spatial prediction of groundwater levels using time series forecasting and a novel spatio-temporal method
.
Water Resources Management
33
,
1425
1437
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02208-9
.
Sen
P. K.
1968
Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau
.
Journal of American Statistical Association
39
,
1379
1389
.
doi:10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934
.
Shadmani
M.
,
Marofi
S.
&
Roknian
M.
2012
Trend analysis in reference evapotranspiration using Mann-Kendall and Spearman's Rho tests in arid regions of Iran
.
Water Resources Management
26
,
211
224
.
doi 10.1007/s11269-011-9913-z
.
Shamsudduha
M.
,
Chandler
R. E.
,
Taylor
R. G.
&
Ahmed
K. M.
2009.
Recent trends in groundwater levels in a highly seasonal hydrological system: The Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
13
(
12
),
2373
2385
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2373-2009
.
Sharma
A.
,
Maharana
P.
,
Sahoo
S.
&
Sharma
P.
2022.
Environmental change and groundwater variability in South Bihar, India
.
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
19
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100846.
Sinha
R.
,
Gupta
S.
&
Nepal
S.
2018.
Groundwater dynamics in North Bihar plains
.
Current Science
14
(
12
),
2482
2493
.
Thakur
G. S.
&
Thomas
T.
2011.
Analysis of groundwater levels for detection of trend in Sagar district, Madhya Pradesh
.
Journal of the Geological Society of India
77
,
303
308
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-011-0038-z
.
Vousoughi
F. D.
2022.
Recognizing the relationship between the groundwater level and hydrological time-series: A case study of the Ardabil Plain
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
13
(
7
),
2700–2712
.
doi: 10.2166/wcc.2022.067
.
Vousoughi
F. D.
,
Dinpashoh
Y.
,
Aalami
M. T.
&
Jhajharia
D.
2012
Trend analysis of groundwater using non-parametric methods (case study: Ardabil plain)
.
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
27
,
547
559
.
doi: 10.1007/s00477-012-0599-4
.
Wakode
H. B.
,
Baier
K.
,
Jha
R.
&
Azzam
R.
2018
Impact of urbanization on groundwater recharge and urban water balance for the city of Hyderabad. India
.
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
6
(
1
),
51
62
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.10.003
.
Webster
R.
&
Oliver
M. A.
2007
Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2(1). http://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2002.0321
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).