Climate change has an immense impact on the environment, ecology, agriculture, and economy. As the most influential climate prediction platform in the world, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change provides important data on predicted future climate change trends. Based on 10 models under the RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 emission scenarios, in this study, we obtained 0.5 × 0.5° data through down-scaling data processing and predicted future rainfall and temperature changes in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region of China. Combined with historical observed data of 198 meteorological stations in the region, the relationships between the predicted values of the model and the measured values were analyzed using the Taylor diagram method. The results show that (1) the future precipitation capacity assessed by the global climate system is generally higher than observed data; (2) for assessment of future temperatures, RCP8.5 shows a larger increase than RCP4.5; (3) for the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, our results show that the Atmospheric Chemistry Coupled Version of Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate-Earth System (MIROC-ESM-CHEM) model is more consistent with the evaluation of future precipitation capacity, the Hadley Centre Global Environment Model, version 2-Earth System(HadGEM2-ES) model is more consistent with the future RCP4.5 scenario temperature evaluation, and the MIROC-ESM-CHEM model is more consistent with the future RCP8.5 scenario temperature evaluation.

  • The future changes and related uncertainties of rainfall and temperature in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region on an annual average scale was analyzed.

  • Combined with observed historical data the relationships between the model's predicted values and the measured values were analyzed.

  • A more suitable climate model in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region was selected after comparison.

With continuous societal development, carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is continually increasing and the global climate is gradually warming (Pfister & Stocker 2021). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports show that the global surface air temperature increased by an average of 0.4–0.8 °C during the 20th century. The 20th century has been the century with the largest rate of surface temperature increase in the past millennium, and the 1990s have been the warmest decade in the past 100 years (IPCC 2014). According to the simulation results of different climate scenarios, it is estimated that the global mean temperature will increase by 0.2 °C every 10 years over the next 100 years and sea level may rise by 9–88 cm by the end of the 21st century (Schewe et al. 2010; Hateren et al. 2013). Although there remains great uncertainty regarding these predictions, global climate change will have a greater impact on agriculture, forestry, water resources, and coastal areas and has been recognized by an increasing number of countries and societies (Girma et al. 2020; Kendall & Spang 2020; Khan et al. 2020). Climate change is predicted to lead to more frequent droughts, extreme rainstorms, and other meteorological disasters (Nigussie & Altunkaynak 2019; Lochbihler et al. 2021). Climate change has been recognized by the international community as one of the most important global environmental problems (Bach 1998).

As for many other countries, China's environment, ecosystems, agriculture, and economy have been affected by climate change (Li et al. 2018). China's glaciers and frozen soil have been declining since 1970 (Wong 2015). On a regional scale, annual precipitation has undergone significant changes, whereby precipitation in arid and semi-arid regions in the west has increased over the past 30 years (Hua et al. 2016). As the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region is China's capital economic center, future climate change trends in this region have attracted considerable attention from scholars (Guo et al. 2020). In recent years, with rapid urbanization, heavy rainfall and extreme rainfall events in flood seasons have occurred more frequently, and the social and economic losses caused by urban rainstorms and waterlogging have become increasingly serious (Zhang et al. 2014). Using the global CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase5) combined with regional characteristics, studies into the future climate change trend and its spatial variation in the BTH region are of great significance for future regional climate change research and the selection of model driving factors (Chen & Sun 2015; Tilmes et al. 2015; Demory et al. 2020). Many scholars have investigated the application of global climate models in different regions and from different perspectives (Baker et al. 2021; Zaveri et al. 2021). Mumo & Yu (2020) studied the relationship between rainfall changes in the historical period of the CMIP5 model, observed rainfall in Kenya, and derived a suitable prediction model for Kenya. The feature selection method to develop a suitable climate model for predicting future precipitation and temperature in Pakistan. Sheehan et al. (2015) analyzed the main vegetation changes in the Pacific Northwest of the United States under one of the CMIP5 future climate models. Li et al. (2020) comparatively analyzed the aerosol load and optical depth based on CMIP5 simulation data. However, few scholars have analyzed the CMIP5 model for one of the BTH regions, which is one of China's most important economic centers. Jing et al. (2024) analyzed the dimensional structure of organized precipitation systems over the BTH region in summer. Peilan et al. (2024) analyzed the impacts of compound extreme weather events on summer ozone in the BTH region. Based on measured data from weather stations in the BTH region combined with CMIP5 data, in this study, we aimed to analyze the regional availability of 10 models under the two concentration scenarios of RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 and provide a reliable meteorological drive for predicting regional water resources.

This study was conducted in the BTH region of China. The region's total area is 216,500 km2, accounting for 2.3% of the total area of China, and includes Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province. The BTH region is bordered by the Taihang Mountains to the west and Bohai Bay to the east. The topography of the northwest and north is relatively high, and that of the south and east is relatively flat. The region belongs to the temperate semi-humid and semi-arid continental monsoon climate zone, with similar climatic characteristics and coexisting resource endowments. The development advantages complement each other, and the water resources system is in the same line. It is controlled by the Siberian continental air mass, cold and without snow, and prevailing northerly and northwesterly winds in winter. In spring, the region is affected by the Mongolian continental air mass; the temperature increases rapidly, wind speed is high, the climate is dry, and evaporation is high, often forming arid, windy, and sandy weather. Furthermore, the influence of oceanic air masses is relatively humid, with high temperatures and heavy rainfall. However, due to the inconsistency of the time, intensity, and range of influences of the Pacific subtropical high in summer, rainfall varies greatly, and droughts and floods occur. Autumn is generally cool, with less rainfall.

The model data were selected from five global climate models of CMIP5, with a horizontal resolution of 0.5 × 0.5°, processed by the statistical down-scaling method (Table 1). GFDL-ESM2M is a model used to study climate variability and change issues on a seasonal to centennial time scale and is composed of separate atmosphere, ocean, sea ice, and land component models, which interact through a flux coupler module. NorESM1-M is an isopycnic coordinate ocean model and advanced chemistry–aerosol–cloud–radiation interaction schemes. And it has a horizontal resolution of approximately 2° for the atmosphere and land components and 1° for the ocean and ice components. MIROC-ESM-CHEM reproduces transient variations in surface air temperatures, as well as the present-day climatology for the zonal-mean zonal winds and temperatures from the surface to the mesosphere. HadGEM2-ES is a coupled earth system model that includes earth system components as a standard. It is a unified atmospheric model developed and used by the Meteorological Administration for seamless applications ranging from short-range numerical weather forecasting to seasonal, inter-decadal, and centennial climate predictions. IPSL-CM5A-LR is a coupling model that includes coupling atmospheric circulation and ocean modules, including sea ice and marine biogeochemical models. The atmosphere has a regular horizontal grid of 39 vertical levels. The ocean model operates on irregular grids, enhanced around the Arctic and sub-arctic oceans and the equator. Five sets of global climate model interpolation and correction results were provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP). They were extracted and converted by the Environmental Development Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences to American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) codes. A total of 169 grid data points were extracted according to the scope of the study area. This model's climate change prediction experiment includes four typical concentration paths (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5). Each scenario assumes a set of greenhouse gases, aerosols, and chemically active gas emissions and concentrations.

Table 1

The climate models under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 paths of CMIP5 used in this study, and their research institute, country, with a horizontal resolution of 0.5 × 0.5°

ModelResearch instituteCountry
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL-ESM2G) NOAA GFDL USA 
Hadley Centre Global Environment Model, version 2-Earth System (HadGEM2-ES) MOHC UK 
The Institut Pierre Simon Laplace – Coupled Modelling the fifth version (IPSL-CM5A-LR) IPSL France 
Atmospheric Chemistry Coupled Version of Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate-Earth System (MIROC-ESM-CHEM) MIROC Japan 
The Norwegian Earth System Model version 1 with Intermediate Resolution (NorESM1-M) NCC Norway 
ModelResearch instituteCountry
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL-ESM2G) NOAA GFDL USA 
Hadley Centre Global Environment Model, version 2-Earth System (HadGEM2-ES) MOHC UK 
The Institut Pierre Simon Laplace – Coupled Modelling the fifth version (IPSL-CM5A-LR) IPSL France 
Atmospheric Chemistry Coupled Version of Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate-Earth System (MIROC-ESM-CHEM) MIROC Japan 
The Norwegian Earth System Model version 1 with Intermediate Resolution (NorESM1-M) NCC Norway 

For the RCP4.5 scenario, which is another climate scenario under government intervention, with total radiative forcing stabilized at 4.5 W/m2 in 2100, atmospheric CO2 concentration increased to 538 ppm, decreasing and N2O increased to 372 ppb. The total global population reached 9 billion, and then began to decrease. In addition, the use of renewable energy and carbon capture systems and the use of fossil fuels continue to decrease. Carbon storage increases and greenhouse gas emissions also significantly decrease with the increase of forest area. Due to the implementation of the afforestation policy and increased crop yield per unit area, RCP4.5 is the only emission mode with reduced arable land. And RCP4.5 is an intermediate stable path relative to the RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios closer to actual development. The RCP8.5 scenario assumes the largest population, low technological innovation rate, and slow energy improvement; it has long-term high energy demand and high greenhouse gas emissions without climate change response policies. The temperature and radiation (i.e., sunshine hours) of this scenario, wind speed, and relative humidity are all affected by greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric aerosols. Considering the above reasons, the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios are selected for analysis in this study.

The observed data were obtained from the China Meteorological Center. The meteorological data included hydrological data in the BHT region from 1960 to 2019. The Kriging interpolation method was used to obtain 60 years of continuous and complete rainfall and temperature data from 197 stations (as shown in Figure 1).
Figure 1

Location and the observation stations of the study area.

Figure 1

Location and the observation stations of the study area.

Close modal

Observed data

Using 198 meteorological stations in the BHT region, the trends of rainfall and temperature changes over the past 60 years were analyzed and tested using the Mann–Kendall method (Wang et al. 2020; Xu et al. 2022). Mann–Kendall test showed a significant trend at a 99% confidence level for both rainfall and temperature with the Z value of −2.48 and 4.07, respectively. Rainfall generally showed a downward trend (Figure 2; Pearson's R = −0.4084) and temperature showed an overall upward trend (Pearson's R = 0.6182).
Figure 2

Measured rainfall and temperature data from the BHT meteorological station (1960–2019).

Figure 2

Measured rainfall and temperature data from the BHT meteorological station (1960–2019).

Close modal

Model rainfall predictions

Figure 3 shows the evolution trend of the mean rainfall in the BHT region from 2000 to 2050 based on the CMIP5 mode. Under continuous global warming in the 21st century, the overall rainfall trend in the BHT region has changed relatively slowly. A total of 10 models were selected under the RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 scenarios, of which four models show a decreasing trend from 2000 to 2050 and the remaining six types show a slowly increasing trend. The data obtained from analyses of CMIP5 are quite different from the historical data trend from 1960 to 2019. For example, after 2000, the annual mean rainfall of the global climate forecast was excessively high, whereas the observed rainfall data generally showed a decrease.
Figure 3

Rainfall comparison of five climate models under two emission scenarios of RCP4.5 and RCP8.5.

Figure 3

Rainfall comparison of five climate models under two emission scenarios of RCP4.5 and RCP8.5.

Close modal
Figure 4 shows the spatial distribution characteristics of the mean annual rainfall in the BHT region under the RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 scenarios. We selected 2030, 2040, and 2050 as exhibitions. It was found that when RCP4.5-NorESM, RCP4.5-GFDL-ESM2M, RCP8.5-NorESM1-M, and RCP8.5-GFDL-ESM2M are selected, under the predictions of different scenarios, the rainfall center in the BHT region constantly moves. The CMIP5 model captures the ability of the observed spatial model to vary greatly between sites owing to the selected concentration scenario and model. However, the three models under the two concentration scenarios showed that in 2030, rainfall seems mainly concentrated in Bohai Bay and the central area of the BHT region. In 2040, the rainfall center will gradually move downward, and the center will be distributed in strips. For example, in the RCP4.5-GFDL-ESM2M model, there will be three rainfall centers in 2040. In 2050, the rainfall centers will be concentrated in the northeast corner of the BHT region. Through comparison, it was found that in different concentration scenarios (RCP8.5 and RCP4.5), the difference in the spatial distribution of rainfall was smaller than that of different simulation methods (RCP4.5-NorESM1-M-2030 and RCP4.5-GFDL-ESM2M-2030).
Figure 4

Comparison of future rainfall predictions of the climate model under two concentration scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) using 2030, 2040, and 2050 as examples.

Figure 4

Comparison of future rainfall predictions of the climate model under two concentration scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) using 2030, 2040, and 2050 as examples.

Close modal

Temperature predicted by the models

Figure 5 shows the evolution trend of the mean temperature in the BHT region from 2000 to 2050 based on the CMIP5 model. Based on the RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 concentration scenarios, under continuous global warming in the 21st century, the temperature in the BHT region shows an overall increasing trend and RCP8.5 shows a relatively large increase (Figure 6). In the model predictions, as time and emission scenarios go backward, the uncertainty of the prediction results gradually increases. When RCP8.5-GFDL-ESM2M is selected, the annual mean temperature will increase by approximately 0.7% by 2030, by approximately 5% by 2040, and by approximately 7% by 2050 compared with the mean data of the BHT region in 2019. Analyses of historical data showed that the temperature in the study area exhibited a downward trend from 1960 to 1985, and an upward trend from 1985 to 2019 (Figure 2). Since the beginning of the 21st century, the rate of temperature increase in the BHT region has increased every 10 years. This phenomenon shows that with economic development, the continuous expansion of the BHT urban circle has an impact on regional temperature.
Figure 5

Comparison of temperature of five climate models under two concentration scenarios (RCP4.5 and 8.5).

Figure 5

Comparison of temperature of five climate models under two concentration scenarios (RCP4.5 and 8.5).

Close modal
Figure 6

Comparison of climate model temperature under RCP4.5 and 8.5 concentration scenarios.

Figure 6

Comparison of climate model temperature under RCP4.5 and 8.5 concentration scenarios.

Close modal
Figure 7 shows the spatial distribution characteristics of the annual mean temperature in the BHT region under the RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 scenarios. We selected 2030, 2040, and 2050 as examples. When RCP4.5-NorESM, RCP4.5-GFDL-ESM2M, and RCP8.5-NorESM1-M are selected, under the climate model prediction, the overall temperature in the BHT region gradually decreases as the dimensionality increases. This is more consistent with the topography of the BHT region (Figure 1). In particular, there is a relatively high-temperature area in the northwest of the study area, i.e., the green circle in the blue contour in Figure 1, which is the location of the Shangdu Plain. The three models under the two concentration scenarios show that the overall temperature distribution characteristics of the BHT region vary little between years. However, under the RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 scenarios, the temperature increase predicted by RCP8.5 is much larger than that predicted by RCP4.5 at the same spatial location.
Figure 7

Comparison of the future temperature of the climate model under two concentration scenarios (i.e., RCP4.5 and 8.5) using 2030, 2040, and 2050 as examples.

Figure 7

Comparison of the future temperature of the climate model under two concentration scenarios (i.e., RCP4.5 and 8.5) using 2030, 2040, and 2050 as examples.

Close modal

Model comparison analysis

Taking the actual observation data of annual mean rainfall and temperature over the past 60 years from 198 meteorological stations in the study area as background values, the Taylor diagram was used to compare and analyze 10 climate models under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 concentration scenarios (Figure 8). Analyses of the STDS (i.e., the spatial variability of the analysis data) of the 10 models, the RMSE of decentering (i.e., the green dotted line in Figure 8), and the Pearson CORs showed that the MIROC-ESM-CHEM model is more suitable for predicting rainfall in the study area. This is because the MIROC-ESM-CHEM model has a higher correlation and a smaller RMSD than other models and combines with the skewness and kurtosis (Table 2). For the prediction of temperature in the study area, the HadGEM2-ES model is more suitable for RCP4.5, and the MIROC-ESM-CHEM model is more suitable for RCP8.5. This is because the HadGEM2-ES model has a higher correlation and smaller RMSD than other models and combines with the skewness and kurtosis (Table 3). For evaluating precipitation, the remaining models (e.g., GFDL-ESM2G, HadGEM2-ES, and IPSL-CM5A-LR) have a negative correlation with the measured values in the region, and the precipitation trend predicted by the model differs considerably from the actual value. For air temperature evaluation, the GFDL-ESM2G, IPSL-CM5A-LR, and NorESM1-M models have a negative correlation with the measured values in the region under the RCP4.5, HadGEM2-ES, IPSL-CM5A-LR, and MIROC. The three ESM-CHEM models have a negative correlation with the measured values in the region under the RCP8.5 scenario. The increasing temperature trend predicted by the model is more consistent with the measured temperature of the region; however, the specific interannual changes are quite different.
Table 2

Annual rainfall statistics of the models used in the study

ScenarioModelMeanMaximumMinimumStandard deviationPopulation varianceSkewnessKurtosis
RCP4.5 GFDL-ESM2G 545.87 861.79 365.22 127.41 15,909.68 0.07 −0.79 
HadGEM2-ES 617.06 853.32 370.04 113.30 12,580.43 −0.32 −0.41 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 626.27 824.95 239.8 112.88 12,482.02 −0.52 1.42 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 623.77 836.56 416.14 91.45 8,195.50 0.35 −0.11 
NorESM1-M 552.42 796.76 397.71 74.54 5,442.54 0.07 0.94 
RCP8.5 GFDL-ESM2G 601.03 1,042.75 328.91 128.48 16,178.10 1.23 3.24 
HadGEM2-ES 631.42 880.8 368.42 128.48 16,115.42 0.22 −0.56 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 611.93 914.21 419.84 128.48 12,034.97 0.36 −0.17 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 580.03 969.46 324.93 128.48 19,496.83 0.55 0.01 
NorESM1-M 578.74 826.1 365.78 128.48 10,542.71 0.44 0.00 
ScenarioModelMeanMaximumMinimumStandard deviationPopulation varianceSkewnessKurtosis
RCP4.5 GFDL-ESM2G 545.87 861.79 365.22 127.41 15,909.68 0.07 −0.79 
HadGEM2-ES 617.06 853.32 370.04 113.30 12,580.43 −0.32 −0.41 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 626.27 824.95 239.8 112.88 12,482.02 −0.52 1.42 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 623.77 836.56 416.14 91.45 8,195.50 0.35 −0.11 
NorESM1-M 552.42 796.76 397.71 74.54 5,442.54 0.07 0.94 
RCP8.5 GFDL-ESM2G 601.03 1,042.75 328.91 128.48 16,178.10 1.23 3.24 
HadGEM2-ES 631.42 880.8 368.42 128.48 16,115.42 0.22 −0.56 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 611.93 914.21 419.84 128.48 12,034.97 0.36 −0.17 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 580.03 969.46 324.93 128.48 19,496.83 0.55 0.01 
NorESM1-M 578.74 826.1 365.78 128.48 10,542.71 0.44 0.00 
Table 3

Annual temperature statistics of the models used in the study

ScenarioModelMeanMaximumMinimumStandard deviationPopulation varianceSkewnessKurtosis
RCP4.5 GFDL-ESM2G 11.03 12.71 9.71 0.67 0.44 0.37 −0.30 
HadGEM2-ES 11.46 13.23 9.21 1.03 1.04 −0.39 −0.37 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 11.65 13.94 9.57 1.02 1.01 0.24 −0.73 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 11.70 14.49 9.61 1.27 1.59 0.36 −0.44 
NorESM1-M 11.30 12.93 9.85 0.82 0.65 0.08 −1.09 
RCP8.5 GFDL-ESM2G 11.08 12.37 9.94 0.58 0.33 0.31 −0.65 
HadGEM2-ES 11.35 13.54 9.23 0.86 0.73 −0.05 0.33 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 11.48 13.22 9.57 0.87 0.74 0.03 −0.63 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 11.21 12.86 9.39 0.90 0.80 0.00 −0.85 
NorESM1-M 11.09 12.90 9.76 0.69 0.47 0.25 −0.11 
ScenarioModelMeanMaximumMinimumStandard deviationPopulation varianceSkewnessKurtosis
RCP4.5 GFDL-ESM2G 11.03 12.71 9.71 0.67 0.44 0.37 −0.30 
HadGEM2-ES 11.46 13.23 9.21 1.03 1.04 −0.39 −0.37 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 11.65 13.94 9.57 1.02 1.01 0.24 −0.73 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 11.70 14.49 9.61 1.27 1.59 0.36 −0.44 
NorESM1-M 11.30 12.93 9.85 0.82 0.65 0.08 −1.09 
RCP8.5 GFDL-ESM2G 11.08 12.37 9.94 0.58 0.33 0.31 −0.65 
HadGEM2-ES 11.35 13.54 9.23 0.86 0.73 −0.05 0.33 
IPSL-CM5A-LR 11.48 13.22 9.57 0.87 0.74 0.03 −0.63 
MIROC-ESM-CHEM 11.21 12.86 9.39 0.90 0.80 0.00 −0.85 
NorESM1-M 11.09 12.90 9.76 0.69 0.47 0.25 −0.11 
Figure 8

Zonal average rainfall and temperature of the CMIP5 models in comparison with the observation data. Rainfall analysis of five modes under (a) RCP4.5 and (b) RCP8.5 scenarios; and temperature analysis of five modes under (c) RCP4.5 and (d) RCP8.5 scenarios. The capital letters represent the models; A: Observation, B: GFDL-ESM2G, C: HadGEM2-ES, D: IPSL-CM5A-LR, E: MIROC-ESM-CHEM, F: NorESM1-M.

Figure 8

Zonal average rainfall and temperature of the CMIP5 models in comparison with the observation data. Rainfall analysis of five modes under (a) RCP4.5 and (b) RCP8.5 scenarios; and temperature analysis of five modes under (c) RCP4.5 and (d) RCP8.5 scenarios. The capital letters represent the models; A: Observation, B: GFDL-ESM2G, C: HadGEM2-ES, D: IPSL-CM5A-LR, E: MIROC-ESM-CHEM, F: NorESM1-M.

Close modal

From the overall data, it can be concluded that the CMIP5 model does not show a satisfactory correlation in estimating the interannual variability of future temperature and rainfall in the BHT region of China. The Mann–Kendall trend test shows an annual downward trend in the observed annual precipitation; however, the CMIP5 model shows an overall upward trend. This question also shows that for a certain region, it is not advisable to use the data evaluated by a single model to study future climate change trends. Rather, different aspects of the model should be summarized, and rational use should be made.

Discussion

The error of the CMIP5 model in simulating the observed rainfall and temperature was associated with the convective parameterization scheme. The purpose of designing these schemes is to show the average effect of convection on the model grid, which is transferred to the grid scale as momentum, temperature, and humidity increase (West et al. 2007). According to Hohenegger et al. (2008), these convection schemes were developed for tropical and coarse-resolution models, and are therefore not suitable for temperate regions and high-resolution models. This requires the modeling team to reparameterize the convection scheme to manage the uncertain convection activity in the atmospheric column, resulting in unrealistic results in the model (Kendon et al. 2012).

For regional climate change, global climate models are used to predict, with low resolution and greater uncertainty, when applied in a smaller area. The uncertainty of climate change projections is due to many factors, including the uncertainty of emission scenarios, the natural variability of the climate system, and the uncertainty of the climate model itself (Ito et al. 2020). The uncertainty of greenhouse gas emission levels is an important source of uncertainty in future climate predictions and is related to the uncertainty of future technological development and socioeconomic policies (Cai et al. 2019). There are three main sources of uncertainty in climate prediction: The uncertainty of the scenario (i.e., the uncertainty of future greenhouse gas emissions); the uncertainty of the natural variability within the climate system; and the uncertainty that characterizes the climate process (i.e., the uncertainty of the structural framework).

Conclusions

Based on the CMIP5 model output of historical simulation and future prediction under two RCP scenarios, this study analyzed the future changes and related uncertainties of rainfall and temperature in the BHT region on an annual average scale. The results showed that different statistical indicators lead to different regional matching degrees in the model. The models were inconsistent at different time scales. Compared with the interannual variation, the CMIP5 historical model is more consistent with the observed value in simulating the mean annual temperature variation.

A comparative analysis of 10 climate models under the two scenarios conducted through the Taylor chart algorithm recommended by CMIP combined with historical observation data in the BHT region showed that the MIROC-ESM-CHE model is more consistent with the evaluation of future precipitation capacity and that the HadGEM2-ES model is correct. The future RCP4.5 temperature evaluation is more consistent, and the MIROC-ESM-CHEM model is more consistent with the future RCP8.5 temperature evaluation. This provides an important meteorological driving factor for the analyses of future water resources in the study area.

Analyses of future climate change trends in the study area showed that multiple models have relatively small differences in predicting future temperatures. For the annual average, the increase under RCP8.5 is greater than that under RCP4.5, indicating that radiative forcing has a more significant impact on temperature. The spatial temperature distribution in the study area maintains a strong consistency with the topography and geomorphology, and the temperature in the plain area is relatively high, indicating that urbanization is one of the critical factors affecting regional temperature.

We acknowledge the reviewers and editors for their patience and valuable advice on improving the quality of this paper and for teaching us how to write papers of higher quality. Financial support for this work was provided by the Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Anhui Province (2023AH051181), the Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents of Anhui University of Science and Technology (No:2022yjrc47), the Academician Workstation in Anhui Province of Anhui University of Science and Technology (No: 2022-AWAP-07), and the Independent research project of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin (NO. SKL2022ZD02) References.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Bach
W.
1998
Global warming: The complete briefing (book)
.
International Journal of Climatology
18
(
5
),
579
580
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199804)18:5 < 579::AID-JOC278 > 3.0.CO;2-9
.
Baker
J. C. A.
,
Castilho de Souza
D.
,
Kubota
P. Y.
,
Buermann
W.
,
Coelho
C. A. S.
,
Andrews
M. B.
,
Gloor
M.
,
Garcia-Carreras
L.
,
Figueroa
S. N.
&
Spracklen
D. V.
2021
An assessment of land–atmosphere interactions over South America using satellites, reanalysis, and two global climate models
.
Journal of Hydrometeorology
22
(
4
),
905
922
.
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0132.1
.
Cai
B.
,
Cui
C.
,
Zhang
D.
,
Cao
L.
,
Wu
P.
,
Pang
L.
,
Zhang
J.
&
Dai
C.
2019
China city-level greenhouse gas emissions inventory in 2015 and uncertainty analysis
.
Applied Energy
253
,
N.PAG
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113579
.
Chen
H.
&
Sun
J.
2015
Assessing model performance of climate extremes in China: An intercomparison between CMIP5 and CMIP3
.
Climatic Change
129
(
1–2
),
197
211
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1319-5
.
Demory
M.-E.
,
Berthou
S.
,
Fernández
J.
,
Sørland
S. L.
,
Brogli
R.
,
Roberts
M. J.
,
Beyerle
U.
,
Seddon
J.
,
Haarsma
R.
,
Schär
C.
,
Buonomo
E.
,
Christensen
O. B.
,
Ciarlò
J. M.
,
Fealy
R.
,
Nikulin
G.
,
Peano
D.
,
Putrasahan
D.
,
Roberts
C. D.
,
Senan
R.
,
Steger
C.
,
Teichmann
C.
&
Vautard
R.
2020
European daily precipitation according to EURO-CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs) and high-resolution global climate models (GCMs) from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP)
.
Geoscientific Model Development
13
(
11
),
5485
5506
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5485-2020
.
Girma
A.
,
Yan
D.
,
Wang
H.
,
Song
X.
,
Qin
T.
,
Dorjsuren
B.
,
Gedefaw
M.
,
Abiyu
A.
,
Fikir
D.
,
Wang
J.
&
Yadamjav
O.
2020
Trends of hydroclimate variables in the upper Huai River basin: Implications of managing water resource for climate change mitigation
.
Advances in Meteorology
2020
,
1
16
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8817068
.
Guo
J.
,
Huang
G.
,
Wang
X.
&
Lu
C.
2020
Projections of daily mean surface temperature over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region through a stepwise cluster downscaling method
.
Theoretical & Applied Climatology
141
(
1/2
),
71
86
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03172-w
.
Hateren
J. H.
2013
A fractal climate response function can simulate global average temperature trends of the modern era and the past millennium
.
Climate Dynamics
40
(
11–12
),
2651
2670
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1375-3
.
Hohenegger
C.
,
Brockhaus
P.
,
Bretherton
C.
&
Schar
C.
2008
Towards climate simulations at cloud-resolving scales
.
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
17
(
4
),
383
394
.
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0303
.
Hua
L.
,
Zhong
L.
&
Ke
Z.
2016
Precipitation recycling and soil-precipitation interaction across the arid and semi-arid regions of China
.
International Journal of Climatology
36
(
11
),
3708
3722
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4586
.
IPCC
2014
Synthesis Report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change (2014). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151.
Ito
R.
,
Shiogama
H.
,
Nakaegawa
T.
&
Takayabu
I.
2020
Uncertainties in climate change projections covered by the ISIMIP and CORDEX model subsets from CMIP5
.
Geoscientific Model Development
13
(
3
),
859
872
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-859-2020
.
Jing
X.
,
Rui
L.
,
Xiaoye
F.
&
Yu
W.
2024
Aerosol effects on the three-dimensional structure of organized precipitation systems over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in summer
.
Atmospheric Research
107146
.
doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.107146
.
Kendall
A.
&
Spang
E. S.
2020
The role of industrial ecology in food and agriculture's adaptation to climate change
.
Journal of Industrial Ecology
24
(
2
),
313
317
.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12851
.
Kendon
E. J.
,
Roberts
N. M.
,
Senior
C. A.
&
Roberts
M. J.
2012
Realism of rainfall in a very high-resolution regional climate model
.
Journal of Climate
25
(
17
),
5791
5806
.
https://doi. https://org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00562.1
.
Khan
M. M.
,
Masud Cheema
M. J.
,
Arshad
M.
&
Khaliq
T.
2020
Evaluation of climate change adaptation practices in the agriculture sector using satellite imagery in Pakistan
.
Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences
57
(
5
),
1317
1326
.
https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/20.241
.
Li
W.
,
Jiang
Z.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Li
L.
&
Sun
Y.
2018
Additional risk in extreme precipitation in China from 1.5 °C to 2.0 °C global warming levels
.
Science Bulletin
63
(
4
),
228
234
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2017.12.021
.
Li
R.
,
Ma
X.
,
Xiong
F.
,
Jia
H.
,
Sha
T.
&
Tian
R.
2020
Comparisons and evaluation of aerosol burden and optical depth in CMIP5 simulations over East Asia
.
Journal of Atmospheric & Solar-Terrestrial Physics
206
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105315
.
Lochbihler
K.
,
Lenderink
G.
&
Siebesma
A. P.
2021
Cold pool dynamics shape the response of extreme rainfall events to climate change
.
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
13
(
2
),
1
16
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002306
.
Mumo
L.
&
Yu
J.
2020
Gauging the performance of CMIP5 historical simulation in reproducing observed gauge rainfall over Kenya
.
Atmospheric Research
236
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104808.
Nigussie
T. A.
&
Altunkaynak
A.
2019
Impacts of climate change on the trends of extreme rainfall indices and values of maximum precipitation at Olimpiyat Station, Istanbul, Turkey
.
Theoretical & Applied Climatology
135
(
3–4
),
1501
1515
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2449-x
.
Peilan
L.
,
Run
L.
,
Zheng
L.
,
Shiyi
L.
,
Yanxing
W.
,
Wenzhao
H.
&
Xin
X.
2024
Impacts of compound extreme weather events on summer ozone in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
.
Atmospheric Pollution Research
15
(
3
),
102030
.
doi:10.1016/j.apr.2023.102030
.
Schewe
J.
,
Levermann
A.
&
Meinshausen
M.
2010
Climate change under a scenario near 1.5 °C of global warming: Monsoon intensification, ocean warming and steric sea level rise
.
Earth System Dynamics Discussions
1
(
1
),
297
324
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-1-297-2010
.
Sheehan
T.
,
Bachelet
D.
&
Ferschweiler
K.
2015
Projected major fire and vegetation changes in the Pacific Northwest of the conterminous United States under selected CMIP5 climate futures
.
Ecological Modelling
317
,
16
29
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.023
.
Tilmes
S.
,
Mills
M. J.
,
Niemeier
U.
,
Schmidt
H.
,
Robock
A.
,
Kravitz
B.
,
Lamarque
J.-F.
,
Pitari
G.
&
English
J. M.
2015
A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models
.
Geoscientific Model Development
8
(
1
),
43
49
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-43-2015
.
Wang
F.
,
Shao
W.
,
Yu
H.
,
Kan
G. Y.
,
He
X.
&
Zhang
D.
et al
2020
Re-evaluation of the power of the Mann-Kendall test for detecting monotonic trends in hydrometeorological time series
.
Frontiers in Earth Science
2020
.
doi:10.3389/feart.2020.00014
.
West
G. L.
,
Steenburgh
W. J.
&
Cheng
W. Y. Y.
2007
Spurious grid-scale precipitation in the North American regional reanalysis
.
Monthly Weather Review
135
(
6
),
2168
2184
.
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3375.1
.
Wong
E.
2015
Chinese glacier's retreat signals trouble for Asian water supply
.
New York Times
165
(
57075
),
A4
A21
.
Xu
C.
,
Sun
Q.
&
Lu
C.
2022
Analysis of rainfall and temperature characteristics and its correlation with southern oscillation index in Beijing, China
.
Water Science & Technology: Water Supply
22
(
4
),
4544
4557
.
doi:10.2166/ws.2022.116
.
Zaveri
R. A.
,
Easter
R. C.
,
Singh
B.
,
Wang
H.
,
Lu
Z.
,
Tilmes
S.
,
Emmons
L. K.
,
Vitt
F.
,
Zhang
R.
,
Liu
X.
,
Ghan
S. J.
&
Rasch
P. J.
2021
Development and evaluation of chemistry-aerosol-climate model CAM5-chem-MAM7-Mosaic: Global atmospheric distribution and radiative effects of nitrate aerosol
.
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
13
(
4
),
1
24
.
doi:10.1029/2020MS002346
.
Zhang
Y.
,
Smith
J. A.
,
Luo
L.
,
Wang
Z.
&
Baeck
M. L.
2014
Urbanization and rainfall variability in the Beijing metropolitan region
.
Journal of Hydrometeorology
15
(
6
),
2219
2235
.
doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-0180.1
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).