The present study assesses the chemical characteristics and irrigation suitability of water in the Hirakud reservoir and main canal. Water samples were collected from 10 different sites during the premonsoon, monsoon, and postmonsoon seasons. The pH, EC, TDS, major ions, and trace metals were estimated using standard methods. The pH of water samples was slightly alkaline in a few sites. The concentration of all the major ions was below the permissible limit except for K+. The concentration of cations and anions in water was in the order of Ca2+ > Na+ >Mg2+ > K+ and HCO3 > Cl > SO42− > NO3 respectively. Piper's trilinear diagram revealed that water samples were of Mg-HCO3 and mixed type. A strong correlation of Cl with other ions suggested precipitation dominance in the hydrogeochemistry of water. The concentration of all trace metals in water samples was above the permissible limit across the season. Although reservoir water was of excellent category as per EC and SAR, RSC remained above the limit across the season. PCA suggested that anthropogenic and geogenic processes regulate water quality in the reservoir. The present work provides a baseline for water quality management policy for the Hirakud reservoir as well as the command area.

  • Water in the Hirakud reservoir is of moderate quality for irrigation.

  • Water quality varies significantly across the seasons.

  • Fe, Cu, and Cr concentrations were found above the permissible limit.

  • Multivariate analysis indicates anthropogenic activities influencing water quality in the reservoir.

Due to widespread water pollution from increased industrialization and urbanization, maintaining water quality for various human purposes is gradually becoming a big challenge across the globe. Although 71% of the total earth's surface is occupied by aquatic bodies, the percentage of accessible freshwater suitable for human use is a meager 0.5% of the total available water. For human consumption such as drinking, agricultural, industrial, and recreational purposes, 60% of the total freshwater comes from rivers, lakes, and wetlands (Wada et al. 2014; Abbott et al. 2019). The easy accessibility for disposal of wastewater makes most of the surface water aquatic bodies vulnerable to pollution. The quality of surface water in a region is mostly determined by natural processes like erosion, precipitation input, as well as anthropogenic exploitation of water resources for various purposes such as industrial activities, mining, urban development, and agriculture (Haidary et al. 2013; Ayari et al. 2021, 2023). In Vietnam, groundwater quality was assessed for drinking purposes using the integrated water quality index (IWQI). The water samples were analyzed for pH, TDS, nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4+), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), and total coliform and weighed parameters assigned for IWQI calculation (Nguyen et al. 2022).

Prolonged irrigation with poor-quality water leads to reduced crop productivity, and poor quality of crop products affects the health and well-being of consumers as well as farmers coming in direct contact with the irrigation water. Water quality parameters (pH, TDS, and turbidity) were measured in secondary treated wastewater and were infiltrated through the soil matrix to remove contaminants (Raji & Packialakshmi 2022). Alteration in soil characteristics and crops on prolonged irrigation reflects the quality of the irrigation water (Jain et al. 2007; Etteieb et al. 2017). Total dissolved solids (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC), and concentration of major ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, CO32−, HCO3, SO42−, Cl, and NO3) dictate the quality of water for irrigation (Acharya et al. 2020). The dissolved ions in irrigation water within the permissible limit are essential for the soil permeability and growth of plants, while the concentration above the permissible limit causes salinity and sodicity hazard in soil (Kumari 2017; Zaman et al. 2018; Acharya et al. 2020). Irrigation water with more than 60% sodium content may disrupt the soil's physical properties (Singh et al. 2018). On the other hand, surface water quality is highly susceptible to human activities such as mining, industries, and direct discharge of urban and agricultural wastes, which alters its physical, chemical, and biological characteristics (Gupta et al. 2016; Reddy et al. 2020). The chemical facies of river basins have been shown to reflect natural and anthropogenic interferences in the catchment. The primary source of riverine Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3, and SO42− is natural, while trace metals, NO3, and NH4+ are induced by anthropogenic activities (Gibbs 1970; Haidary et al. 2013; Hussain et al. 2020). Several researchers in the past have used electrical conductivity (EC), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), percent sodium (%Na), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), magnesium hazard ratio (MHR), and permeability index (PI) classifications for irrigation water quality index in many parts of the world (Sundaray et al. 2006; Brindha et al. 2013; Panda et al. 2014; Kumari 2017; Reddy et al. 2020). SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) is an effective monitoring index of sodium in irrigation water (Li et al. 2018; Tayyab et al. 2022). While high contents of magnesium may increase alkalinity, high contents of chlorides and the presence of boron may induce plant toxicity, and other constituents such as heavy metals may be toxic for crops and humans. High salinity reduces plant growth and makes it difficult for the plant roots to absorb water because of the high osmotic pressure of the water caused by a high concentration of water-soluble ions around the plant roots (Adejumobi et al. 2022). Regular monitoring of irrigation water quality is therefore essential for managing soil as well as human health in the affected area (Aziz et al. 2021).

The Hirakud Dam is located on the Mahanadi River in the state of Odisha, India, and has a reservoir capacity of 5,375 million m3/year. The command area is principally irrigated by two main canals (i) Sason canal and (ii) Bargarh canal. Bargarh main canal irrigates 135,000 ha of land with 115 m3/s capacity serving as a lifeline to around 90,000 farmer families residing in the area (Mahapatra 2014). Water from the reservoir and upstream rivers is heavily polluted due to increased urbanization and the associated increase in domestic and industrial wastewater. In a lotic system like a river, the pollutants deposited in the sediments during nonmonsoon seasons generally get resuspended and are carried downstream increasing the pollutants load near the ocean/reservoir, resulting in deterioration of reservoir water quality (Sahu et al. 2023). The impact of poor-quality irrigation water from reservoirs varies depending on climate, soil type, and crops grown (Singh et al. 2018). Earlier studies on the Mahanadi River around Hirakud investigated seasonal variations in microbiological and physicochemical parameters (Kar et al. 2010). In the Mahanadi River estuarine system, extensive studies on spatial and temporal variations in nutrient and chemical characteristics for irrigation suitability were conducted (Sundaray et al. 2006, 2009). In the Hirakud Command Area, groundwater aquifer has been assessed for physicochemical quality (Dhar et al. 2014). Many industries such as iron and steel plants, aluminum smelting plants, and ore processing plants have mushroomed in the upper head of the river basin. Tributaries of the river upstream of the Hirakud reservoir discharge a broader set of trace metals into the river basin. Earlier, surface water quality has been assessed with reference to trace metal concentration (Sundaray et al. 2012; Hussain et al. 2020). However, the irrigation suitability of the Hirakud reservoir and Bargarh Main Canal has not been investigated although it has irrigated thousands of hectares of land in the Bargarh district for the last 50 years. Hence, in the present study, water quality from the reservoir and Bargarh main canal was assessed for irrigation suitability, and their seasonal variation was determined to evaluate the possible adverse impact on soil in the irrigated area.

Study area

The present study was conducted in the Hirakud reservoir and Bargarh main canal, a part of the Hirakud canal command that extends from 21°05′N to 21°55′N latitude and from 83°55′E to 84°05′E longitude. The Hirakud canal system consists of three canals, namely, Bargarh Main Canal, Sason Main Canal, and Sambalpur distributary command area. The Hirakud dam project is a multipurpose scheme intended for flood control, irrigation, and power generation, which is the first major multipurpose water resource project after the independence of India. It is built across river Mahanadi at about 15 km upstream of Sambalpur town in the state of Odisha on the eastern coast of the country (Dhar et al. 2014).

The climate of the command area is tropical monsoon with four distinct seasons: (a) summer – March to May, (b) monsoon – June to September, (c) postmonsoon – October to November, and (d) winter – December to February. The area gets rain from the southwest monsoon. The annual average rainfall is 1,250 mm, and 75% dependable annual rainfall is 816 mm. The mean maximum and minimum temperatures are 42 and 13 °C, respectively (Rath & Swain 2018).

Collection of water samples

Seasonal variation and surface runoff during the rainy season are also known to influence the composition and quality of river water (Gupta et al. 2016). Water samples were collected during three (premonsoon, postmonsoon, and monsoon) seasons from August 2020 and January 2022 from 10 different sites in the reservoir and the main canal (Figure 1) at a depth of 30 cm (Hussain et al. 2020). High-density polyethylene sample bottles soaked in 10% HNO3 for 24 h were used. For the quantification of metals, 500 mL of collected water samples were acidified immediately after each sample collection. Thereafter, the samples were stored at 4 °C in sampling kits and brought to the laboratory for quantitative metal analysis.
Figure 1

Sampling sites in Hirakud Dam and Bargarh main canal in Hirakud command area.

Figure 1

Sampling sites in Hirakud Dam and Bargarh main canal in Hirakud command area.

Close modal

Analysis of physicochemical parameters and trace metals of water samples

All physicochemical analyses were performed according to the protocol laid by FAO (2003), WHO (2006), and APHA (1995). Measurements for water temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC) were done onsite, and total dissolved solids (TDS) were measured gravimetrically after evaporating 100 mL-aliquot dried at 105 °C. The concentrations of Na+ and K+ were measured using the flame photometer. Ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl, and HCO3) were determined by volumetric titration methods and sulfate (SO42−) and nitrate (NO3) were determined by spectrophotometer. For the analysis of trace metals such as Fe, As, Cu, Cr, and Hg, atomic absorption spectrophotometry was used.

Suitability assessment of irrigation water

Surface water was assessed for irrigation suitability using various parameters and the formulae provided by various investigators and the United States Salinity Laboratory diagram, which is based on salinity (EC) and SAR (USSL 1954):
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean, interquartile range, standard deviation) were determined for the physicochemical parameters, trace metals, and water indices. One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to test the variations of physicochemical parameters and indices between seasons. The correlation matrix was determined using the SPSS. Factor analysis was done using the principal component analysis (PCA) method. The PCs with eigenvalues > 1.0 were only considered, and highly loaded variables having absolute values > 0.6 were retained under each PC (Abuzaid & Jahin 2022).

Chemical composition of water samples across the seasons

Most of the water samples from the canal show specific charge balance denoted as normalized inorganic charge balance (NICB = (TZ+ − TZ)/TZ+)) within ±10%, which suggested that all the samples were well balanced, where TZ+ and TZ represent the total positive and negative inorganic charges, respectively.

Physico-chemical parameters and trace metal concentration in the reservoir and main canal are mentioned in Table 1. The pH of the water in the reservoir and canal ranged from 5.55 to 8.45. During the premonsoon season, the average pH was found to be 7.58 ± 0.60, while during the monsoon and postmonsoon seasons, it was found to be 7.00 ± 0.31 and 7.70 ± 0.50, respectively. Electrical conductivity (EC) ranged from 61.76 to 129.60 μScm−1. It ranged from 61.76 to 75.22 μScm−1 and was lower during the monsoon season than the nonmonsoon season. On the contrary, it ranged from 82.44 to 129.60 and from 92.62 to 119.04 μScm−1 during premonsoon and postmonsoon seasons, respectively. TDS of water ranged from 98.09 to 314.82 mgL−1, in the reservoir and canal. TDS during the premonsoon season was found to be higher compared to other seasons. During the premonsoon season, it ranged from 168.24 to 314.82 mgL−1, while it ranged from 98.09 to 187.11 mgL−1 and from 163.98 to 229.82 mgL−1 during monsoon and postmonsoon seasons, respectively. The temperature of the water in the reservoir and canal ranged from 15.4 to 39.13 °C. During the premonsoon season, the temperature was as high as 38.67 °C. The concentration of the major anions (HCO3, SO42−, and Cl) constituted around 75% of TDS. Carbonate and bicarbonate concentrations of water ranged from 10.48 to 89.36 mgL−1. It ranged from 61.86 to 89.36 mgL−1 during the postmonsoon season and was higher than other seasons. It ranged from 10.48 to 14.66 and from 18.44 to 23.28 mgL−1 during premonsoon and monsoon seasons, respectively. The concentration of sulfate ranged from 2.13 to 224.86 mgL−1 in the reservoir and canal water. It ranged from 8.79 to 224.86 mgL−1 during postmonsoon and was higher than the other seasons. It ranged from 3.16 to 189.21 and 2.13 to 187.16 mgL−1 during premonsoon and monsoon seasons. The concentration of chloride ranged from 0.31 to 21.27 mgL−1 in reservoir and canal water. During the postmonsoon season, it ranged from 7.82 to 21.27 mgL−1 and was higher than in the other seasons. It ranged from 4.23 to 8.88 and from 0.31 to 1.19 mgL−1 during premonsoon and monsoon seasons, respectively. The concentration of nitrate in water ranged from 0.22 to 6.63 mgL−1. During the monsoon season, it ranged from 4.16 to 5.64 mgL−1 and was higher than the other seasons. It ranged from 1.18 to 4.07 and from 0.22 to 6.63 mgL−1 during premonsoon and postmonsoon seasons, respectively. On the other hand, the major cations constituted around 25% of total TDS. The concentration of calcium ions ranged from 1.08 to 19.57 mgL−1. It ranged from 8.71 to 19.57 mgL−1 during the postmonsoon season and was higher than in the other seasons. It ranged from 3.40 to 9.75 and from 1.08 to 1.28 mgL−1 during premonsoon and monsoon seasons, respectively. The concentration of magnesium ion in water ranged from 1.22 to 14.66 mgL−1. It ranged from 5.57 to 14.66 mgL−1 during the postmonsoon season and was higher than in the other seasons. It ranged from 1.22 to 5.36 and from 2.23 to 4.02 mgL−1 during premonsoon and monsoon seasons, respectively. Similarly, the concentration of sodium ion in water ranged from 3.39 to 14.11 mgL−1. It was higher during the postmonsoon season than other seasons. The concentration of potassium ion in reservoir and canal water ranged from 1.21 8.33 mgL−1. It was higher during the postmonsoon season and ranged from 1.45 to 8.33 mgL−1. The reported concentration of major ions followed a typical trend for cations (Ca2+> Na+> Mg2+ > K+) and anions (HCO3 >Cl >SO42− >NO3).

Table 1

Descriptive statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation) of the water samples and standards

MeanSDMinMaxMALWHO (2006) 
HDLMPL
pH 7.51 0.57 5.55 8.45 6.5–8.4 7.0 8.5 
EC (μs/cm) 99.80 19.25 61.76 129.60  – 1,500 
Temperature (°C) 28.72 6.41 15.40 39.13 NM – – 
TDS (mg/L) 196.11 45.64 98.09 314.82 2,000 500 1,500 
Na+ (mg/L) 7.51 3.00 3.39 14.11 920 – 200 
K+ (mg/L) 3.74 2.11 1.21 8.33 – – 
Ca2+ (mg/L) 8.63 5.48 1.08 19.57 400 75 200 
Mg2+ (mg/L) 5.25 3.29 1.22 14.66 60 30 150 
SO42− (mg/L) 91.35 57.98 2.13 224.86 1,920 200 400 
HCO3 (mg/L) 39.13 30.45 10.48 89.36 518 v – – 
Cl (mg/L) 7.96 5.40 0.31 21.27 350 s 106 v 200 600 
NO3 (mg/L) 3.05 1.85 0.22 6.63 – 45 – 
Fe (μg/L) 493.71 446.63 28.69 1,892.51 0.3 – 
Zn (μg/L) 69.41 62.08 1.67 214.82 – – 
As (μg/L) 3.42 2.01 0.09 8.09 – – – 
Cu (μg/L) 22.80 15.68 1.65 60.16 0.20 – 
Cr (μg/L) 42.95 39.38 1.17 139.19 0.10 – – 
Na % 47.29 9.14 30.35 68.77 – – – 
SAR (meq/L) 2.97 0.68 1.58 4.64 9 s 3 v – – 
MH (meq/L) 41.44 18.51 14.89 76.63 – – – 
RSC (meq/L) 25.25 23.39 –0.10 64.43 – – – 
MeanSDMinMaxMALWHO (2006) 
HDLMPL
pH 7.51 0.57 5.55 8.45 6.5–8.4 7.0 8.5 
EC (μs/cm) 99.80 19.25 61.76 129.60  – 1,500 
Temperature (°C) 28.72 6.41 15.40 39.13 NM – – 
TDS (mg/L) 196.11 45.64 98.09 314.82 2,000 500 1,500 
Na+ (mg/L) 7.51 3.00 3.39 14.11 920 – 200 
K+ (mg/L) 3.74 2.11 1.21 8.33 – – 
Ca2+ (mg/L) 8.63 5.48 1.08 19.57 400 75 200 
Mg2+ (mg/L) 5.25 3.29 1.22 14.66 60 30 150 
SO42− (mg/L) 91.35 57.98 2.13 224.86 1,920 200 400 
HCO3 (mg/L) 39.13 30.45 10.48 89.36 518 v – – 
Cl (mg/L) 7.96 5.40 0.31 21.27 350 s 106 v 200 600 
NO3 (mg/L) 3.05 1.85 0.22 6.63 – 45 – 
Fe (μg/L) 493.71 446.63 28.69 1,892.51 0.3 – 
Zn (μg/L) 69.41 62.08 1.67 214.82 – – 
As (μg/L) 3.42 2.01 0.09 8.09 – – – 
Cu (μg/L) 22.80 15.68 1.65 60.16 0.20 – 
Cr (μg/L) 42.95 39.38 1.17 139.19 0.10 – – 
Na % 47.29 9.14 30.35 68.77 – – – 
SAR (meq/L) 2.97 0.68 1.58 4.64 9 s 3 v – – 
MH (meq/L) 41.44 18.51 14.89 76.63 – – – 
RSC (meq/L) 25.25 23.39 –0.10 64.43 – – – 

Note: SD: standard deviation, MAL: maximum allowable limit according to (1) Ayers & Westcot (1994) for (d) localized drip irrigation, (s) surface irrigation, and (v) overhead sprinkler irrigation, HDL: highest desirable limit, MPL: maximum permissible limit, EC: electrical conductivity, TDS: total dissolved solids, SAR: sodium absorption ratio, MH: magnesium hazard, RSC: residual sodium carbonate, NM: not mentioned.

The pH is the measure of acidity and alkalinity of water in terms of hydroxyl ion concentration and is one of the most important water quality parameters. It describes the acidic and basic properties of the water because it controls the solubility of different metallic pollutants. It depends on various factors such as the carbonate system present in water (concentration of carbon dioxide and carbonates present in water), erosion of acidic or alkaline compounds from the soil or rock, and release of wastewater effluent. The seasonal variations in pH control the weathering pattern and availability of dissolved ions in the lake water. At some sites, the pH of the canal water was found to be alkaline, which could be due to the presence of alkaline earth metals that combine with soluble CO2 forming carbonate and bicarbonates. Further increase in pH of canal water could lead to the formation of trihalomethanes. Electrical conductivity (EC) represents the ionic strength and is contingent upon the concentration, volume, and movement of ionic entities. It represents the degree of chemical weathering that occurs in the catchment area. An increase in the dissolved ion concentration will increase the electrical conductivity. Therefore, it provides overall insight into the water quality. Also, temperature has a profound effect on electrical conductivity as the movement of ionic components is also affected by temperature variation. The large variation in EC is due to the geochemical processes and anthropogenic contribution dominating the area (Ghazaryan & Chen 2016). The solid content of water depends on the size, type, and concentration of solids, both organic and inorganic present in the water. TDS can originate from various sources such as wastewater, storm flow, and urban runoff (Acharya et al. 2020). Fluctuations in the levels of dissolved solids serve as an indicator of climatic influence on the intensity of processes occurring in the source region. Elevated total dissolved solids (TDS) encompass both natural and human-induced pollutants in water, affecting its color, total alkalinity, and conductivity. This elevation poses risks to both cultivated land and aquatic ecosystems (Aziz et al. 2021). Higher TDS in irrigation water increases the osmotic potential of soil affecting the water absorption capacity of the plants. Higher salt concentrations during the premonsoon days may be due to evaporation. Increased evaporation during premonsoon season could have elevated the total dissolved salts in the water samples. Solubilization of solids at high temperatures during summer could also contribute to higher solid content during premonsoon (Ghazaryan & Chen 2016). However, in a study conducted in the Pokhara Valley of Nepal, the mean EC and TDS were found to be highest during postmonsoon and lowest during the monsoon period due to the dilution effect of monsoon rainfall (Khadka & Ramanathan 2012). Evaluation of groundwater and surface water for agriculture and drinking purposes conducted in south India showed a concentration of different ions was in the order of Na+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ > K+ for cations and Cl > HCO3 > SO42− > F for anions (Sakram & Adimalla 2018). The general chemistry of Tarim River water in China suggested that anions and cations were in the order of Na+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+ > K+ and SO42− > Cl > HCO3 > CO3 (Ghazaryan & Chen 2016). In the present study, the major anions such as HCO3, SO42−, and Cl constituted about 75% of the total TDS in the irrigation water. The source of bicarbonate could be the dissolution of carbonate and/or silicate minerals by carbonic acid (Gupta et al. 2016). Previous investigation reported that the primary bedrock in the Mahanadi River basin is Proterozoic limestones. Major ion chemistry in the basin is affected by silicate weathering with minimal contribution of carbonate weathering (Bastia et al. 2020). The highest HCO3 concentration observed in the reservoir water during the postmonsoon season could be a measure of intense chemical weathering of the silicate rocks and in turn parent mineral composition. The concentration of HCO3 was lower during the monsoon season due to the dilution effect. In addition, studies show that a high concentration of HCO3 in the surface water contributes to the accumulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the surface and subsurface soil when irrigated for a prolonged period (Reddy et al. 2019). Sulfate ions (SO4) present in the surface water are due to the presence of sedimentary rock such as gypsum and anhydride. A study on sources of riverine sulfate suggests that gypsum is the primary source of sulfate ions in the Mahanadi River basin (Rout & Tripathy 2024). During the monsoon period, lower SO42− concentration could be due to the dilution effect of monsoon and lower agriculture-to-lake ratio. The agriculture-to-lake ratio refers to the spatial relationship and balances between agricultural lands and adjacent water bodies like lakes, reservoirs, or wetlands and is an important factor in understanding the interactions between agricultural production and riparian zone ecology. Chloride (Cl) concentration during the monsoon season was very low in the reservoir as well as canal water. Low concentration of Cl suggested minimal anthropogenic contribution such as industrial discharge and domestic wastewater (Reddy et al. 2020). Depending on the chloride concentration and sensitivity of the crop, its toxic effect on soil varies. During the monsoon periods, NO3 concentration was higher due to the leaching of fertilizers in the areas where agricultural activities were intensive. The major cations constitute 25% of the TDS predominated by Ca2+ and followed by Na+ in the irrigation water. During the monsoon period, Ca2+ concentration was lower than in the nonmonsoon seasons, which could be due to the dilution effect and phytoplankton consumption (Mukherjee 2020). The decay of phytoplankton during the postmonsoon season could result in the release of Ca2+ and an increase in the concentration. Weathering in the river basin could also increase the concentration. The presence of multivalent metallic cations is responsible for hardness in water. At high pH, much of its quantities may get precipitated as CaCO3. The concentration of sodium was found to be the highest in postmonsoon days. The sources of Na+ include various rocks, weathering product of silicate rocks, and its displacement from the absorbed complex of rocks and soils by calcium and magnesium (Gupta et al. 2016). Potassium (K+) is an important parameter for water quality. It was higher than the maximum allowable limit according to Ayers & Westcot (1994). Sources of potassium are potash feldspar (KAlSi3O8), mica [(KAl2)(AlSi3O10)(F(OH)2)], and less commonly sylvite (KCl). The geological characteristics of the river basin are in accordance with the facts. Various rocks such as precambrian khondalites, charnockite, granite, and gneiss; proterozoic shale and limestone; gondwana shale, sandstone, and conglomerate; and the recent deltaic alluvium of the river and laterite are the predominant geological formations in the Mahanadi River basin. Feldspar is the major constituent of khondalites (Bastia et al. 2020). Despite being a populated area, the concentration of nitrate does not exceed the maximum allowable limit prescribed by Ayers & Westcot (1994) for irrigation.

Trace metal concentration in reservoir and canal water varied between 28.69 and 1,892.51 μgL−1 for Fe, 1.67 and 214.82 μgL−1 for Zn, 0.09 and 8.09 μgL−1 for As, 1.65 and 60.16 μgL−1 for Cu, and 1.17 and 139.19 μgL−1 for Cr. To see the detailed variation in trace metals in the Hirakud reservoir and canal water, maximum, minimum, and average concentrations along with standard deviation are presented in Table 1. The concentration of all the trace metals was above the permissible limit. It might be an indicative trend of anthropogenic and geogenic activities in the basin as well as a bank of the reservoir (Hussain et al. 2020). The relative abundance of trace metals in the irrigation water was found to be Fe > Zn > Cr > Cu > As. The results also corroborated with the findings of previous studies on the Mahanadi River (Sundaray et al. 2012; Hussain et al. 2020). It could be due to anthropogenic activities, which include indiscriminate discharge of industrial waste, sewage effluents, lead recovery processing from small batteries, and coal mining. The metal concentration during the postmonsoon season was higher for Fe, Zn, Cu, and Cr primarily due to anthropogenic activities and secondarily due to geogenic activities. The concentration range of Fe (28.69–1,892.51 μgL−1) was a concern for all the sampling sites around the year. Of many possibilities, direct discharge of untreated effluents from metal electroplating industries, iron leachates from iron mines, and urban wastes from nearby places could have ended up in such a surge in Fe concentration. The Cr and Cu pollution was observed in both premonsoon and monsoon seasons at all sites with concentration ranges of 1.65–60.16 and 1.17–139.19 μgL−1, respectively. Cu pollution could be due to geogenic activities as a significant source of pollution. The fact that supports the above observation is that Sambalpur districts have potential copper minerals such as chalcopyrite and azurite. Many copper manufacturing units such as those present in Sundergarh directly discharge their waste in the basin. Except for W4, W7, and W9, the concentration of Hg was undetectable in all sites. The temporal variation in trace metal concentration across the studied sites suggested the combined impact of anthropogenic (mainly industrial) and natural (weathering and leaching) factors. The overall concentration of dissolved ions and metals was higher than found in the Mahanadi River in earlier studies (Sundaray et al. 2012; Hussain et al. 2020). One-way ANOVA test indicates that SO42−, Zn, and As showed no significant difference among sites. The concentration of all the parameters (pH, EC, TDS, temperature, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3, Fe, Cu, Cr, Na%, SAR, MH) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in all the studied seasons.

Correlation matrix and principal component analysis

Several factors such as precipitation, anthropogenic interference, topography, and lithological inputs affect the types and concentration of dissolved ions in surface water. Hence, bivariate analysis becomes needful in the establishment of interrelations among their source (Reddy et al. 2020). Pearson correlation analysis shows that except for a few ions such as K+ and trace metal (Zn), TDS has a significant positive correlation (p < 0.01) with all the ions (Figure 2). This strong correlation is an indication of the contribution of the main ions toward canal water salinity. A negative correlation between EC and temperature shows that the conductivity of dissolved ions decreases with the temperature rise.
Figure 2

Correlation matrix among the physico-chemical parameters of irrigation water.

Figure 2

Correlation matrix among the physico-chemical parameters of irrigation water.

Close modal

A positive correlation of Cl with the major ions indicated the dominance of the precipitation mechanism. A similar phenomenon was observed in the major rivers of Western Ghat (Reddy et al. 2020). In all seasons, alkaline earth elements (Ca2+ and Mg2+) showed a strong correlation with alkalis (Na+ and K+). The strong positive correlation of the main exchangeable ions (Na+-Ca2+, Na+-Mg2+) supported the fact that the precipitation–dissolution reaction is the primary mechanism that controls the water quality in the reservoir and Bargarh main canal (Masoud 2013). A strong positive correlation was observed between Cu and Cr in the water, which might be due to similar geogenic activities and mobilities of the ions in the region.

Principal component analysis (PCA) helps classify the original dataset and reduce the large volume of data. The geological interpretation of factors gives an insight into the main hydrological process, which controls the distribution of the measured variable of water in the reservoir and main canal. From this multivariate study, the factor loading of each variable within three selected factors which explains 92.1% of the variability of data, represents a possible source of variation in the hydrochemistry of canal water (Table 2). PC1 explained 41.13% of the total variance and showed higher negative loading of pH, Na+, Ca2+, K+, Mg2+, HCO3, Cl, and Cr. It can be attributed to anthropogenic sources. PC1 can be called an ionic component. PC2 had 21.09% of total variance and showed higher positive loading of EC and TDS while negative loading of Fe and NO3. PC2 can be called a salinity component. PC3 explained 18.21% of the total variance. It shows higher loading of SO42−, Zn, As, and Cu and can be called a heavy metal component. Both PC2 and PC3 showed loading for HCO3, which signifies geogenic attributes such as weathering of mineral-bearing rock, soil erosion, and surface runoff during the rainy season. The Hirakud Dam accounts for a significant dilution and assimilation of dissolved ions and trace metals due to precipitation and wetland activity. In the last decade, there has been an intense increase in Industrial as well as agricultural activities in and around the upstream of Hirakud reservoir, mixing of the effluent and runoff from industries such as coal-fired thermal power plants, steel, aluminum, sponge Iron could have led to the observed alteration of the physicochemical properties of the surface water.

Table 2

Component matrix for irrigation water parameters

PC1PC2PC3PC4
Eigen value 5.06 4.32 3.14 3.02 
Variance % 41.13 21.09 18.21 11.67 
Cumulative variance % 41.13 62.22 80.43 92.1 
pH −0.46 0.28 0.40 −0.41 
EC −0.31 0.84 0.20 0.15 
TDS −0.18 0.85 −0.04 0.20 
Temperature 0.87 0.14 0.25 0.12 
Na+ 0.90 −0.01 −0.13 0.11 
K+ −0.67 −0.03 0.04 0.49 
Ca2+ −0.88 0.20 −0.02 0.08 
Mg2+ −0.88 −0.12 −0.25 −0.03 
SO42− −0.47 −0.05 0.69 −0.09 
HCO3 −0.92 −0.78 −0.55 0.10 
Cl −0.87 0.34 −0.08 −0.09 
NO3 0.22 −0.69 0.29 0.38 
Fe −0.59 −0.64 0.14 −0.09 
Zn −0.07 −0.23 0.70 0.09 
As 0.15 0.32 0.52 0.15 
Cu −0.67 −0.06 0.57 −0.11 
Cr −0.75 −0.32 −0.08 −0.02 
PC1PC2PC3PC4
Eigen value 5.06 4.32 3.14 3.02 
Variance % 41.13 21.09 18.21 11.67 
Cumulative variance % 41.13 62.22 80.43 92.1 
pH −0.46 0.28 0.40 −0.41 
EC −0.31 0.84 0.20 0.15 
TDS −0.18 0.85 −0.04 0.20 
Temperature 0.87 0.14 0.25 0.12 
Na+ 0.90 −0.01 −0.13 0.11 
K+ −0.67 −0.03 0.04 0.49 
Ca2+ −0.88 0.20 −0.02 0.08 
Mg2+ −0.88 −0.12 −0.25 −0.03 
SO42− −0.47 −0.05 0.69 −0.09 
HCO3 −0.92 −0.78 −0.55 0.10 
Cl −0.87 0.34 −0.08 −0.09 
NO3 0.22 −0.69 0.29 0.38 
Fe −0.59 −0.64 0.14 −0.09 
Zn −0.07 −0.23 0.70 0.09 
As 0.15 0.32 0.52 0.15 
Cu −0.67 −0.06 0.57 −0.11 
Cr −0.75 −0.32 −0.08 −0.02 

Suitability of reservoir and canal water for irrigation

Irrigation water if not properly monitored may negatively affect soil properties, crop productivity, and public health of farmers and consumers viz. direct contact and consumption. So, it is essential to assess irrigation water for its suitability. Various water quality parameters such as sodium adsorption ratio (SAR; Richards 1954), sodium percent (% Na; Wilcox 1955), residual sodium carbonate (RSC; Eaton 1950), and magnesium hazard ratio (MR; Raghunath 1987) were calculated by using Equations (1)–(4), where all ions are expressed in meq/L. SAR assesses the impact of sodium hazard which dictates the cation exchange capacity of the soil about calcium and magnesium reaction (Thomas et al. 2015; Banerjee & Ghosh 2016). The classification of irrigation water was carried out based on different values of parameters and indices (Table 3).

Table 3

The irrigation water classification according to mentioned water quality parameters

ParametersCategoriesRangesDescription
Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) (meq/L) Richards (1954)  Excellent 0–10 Do not have sodium hazard 
Good 10–18 Low sodium hazard 
Fair 18–26 Harmful for almost all types of soil 
Poor >26 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Percent sodium (% Na) Wilcox (1955)  Excellent 0–20 Excellent for irrigation 
Good 20–40 Good for irrigation 
Permissible 40–60 Permissible for irrigation 
Doubtful 60–80 Doubtful for irrigation 
Unsuitable >80 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Residual sodium carbonate Richards (1954)  Good <1.25 Generally safe for irrigation 
Medium 1.25–2.5 Marginal as an irrigation source 
Bad >2.5 Generally not suitable for irrigation without improvement 
Electrical conductivity (EC) (μS/cm) Wilcox (1955)  Excellent <250 Low salinity water 
Good 250–750 Medium salinity water 
Permissible 750–2,250 High salinity water 
Doubtful 2,250–5,000 Doubtful for irrigation 
Unsuitable >5,000 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Total dissolved salts (TDS) (mg/L) USDA salinity laboratory Excellent <150 Low salinity hazard 
Good 150–500 Permissible for irrigation 
Fair 500–1,500 Doubtful for irrigation 
Poor >1,500 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Cl (meq/L) Doneen (1964)  Class I >5 Very good to good for irrigation 
Class II 5–10 Good to hazardous for irrigation 
Class III <10 Hazardous to very hazardous for irrigation 
ParametersCategoriesRangesDescription
Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) (meq/L) Richards (1954)  Excellent 0–10 Do not have sodium hazard 
Good 10–18 Low sodium hazard 
Fair 18–26 Harmful for almost all types of soil 
Poor >26 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Percent sodium (% Na) Wilcox (1955)  Excellent 0–20 Excellent for irrigation 
Good 20–40 Good for irrigation 
Permissible 40–60 Permissible for irrigation 
Doubtful 60–80 Doubtful for irrigation 
Unsuitable >80 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Residual sodium carbonate Richards (1954)  Good <1.25 Generally safe for irrigation 
Medium 1.25–2.5 Marginal as an irrigation source 
Bad >2.5 Generally not suitable for irrigation without improvement 
Electrical conductivity (EC) (μS/cm) Wilcox (1955)  Excellent <250 Low salinity water 
Good 250–750 Medium salinity water 
Permissible 750–2,250 High salinity water 
Doubtful 2,250–5,000 Doubtful for irrigation 
Unsuitable >5,000 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Total dissolved salts (TDS) (mg/L) USDA salinity laboratory Excellent <150 Low salinity hazard 
Good 150–500 Permissible for irrigation 
Fair 500–1,500 Doubtful for irrigation 
Poor >1,500 Unsuitable for irrigation 
Cl (meq/L) Doneen (1964)  Class I >5 Very good to good for irrigation 
Class II 5–10 Good to hazardous for irrigation 
Class III <10 Hazardous to very hazardous for irrigation 

High SAR values in irrigation water make the soil compact and impermeable as sodium replaces calcium and magnesium, and hence, it reduces water and air movement (Ghazaryan & Chen 2016). It ranges from 1.58 to 4.64 meq/L (Table 1). SAR in postmonsoon seasons was higher than in monsoon days. Furthermore, sodium concentration is also expressed in terms of percentage (% Na). Percentage Na higher than 80 is unsuitable for irrigation as it causes deflocculation and impairments of tilth and permeability of soil (Amiri et al. 2015). The % Na values were found to be higher in monsoon seasons than in nonmonsoon samples. It may be due to evaporation. Similar observations were found in the Western Ghats (Reddy et al. 2020). During postmonsoon days, 35% of water samples fall into the good category. During premonsoon days, at the S9 site, one sample belongs to the doubtful category. A total of 35% water sample belongs to the permissible category. It may have some negative impact on soil permeability and texture. For mitigation in the irrigated area, some steps such as the use of organic matter, crop residues, subsoiling, and high leaching can be used. RSC is one of the crucial parameters to assess groundwater as well as surface water worldwide (Eaton 1950; Richards 1954). It is evident from Table 1 that bicarbonate ions register a higher concentration than the rest of the ions. Hence, carbonate ions have a profound impact on irrigation water through the precipitation of alkaline earth matter (Ca2+ and Mg2+). RSC during postmonsoon seasons was considerably higher in the studied area. During premonsoon days, water samples fall into a bad category and generally require proper treatment for irrigation. Such conditions prevail due to the impact of different anthropogenic activities such as the intensive discharge of domestic and agricultural wastes (Bouderbala 2015; Thomas et al. 2015). The suitability of irrigation water is also affected by excess magnesium as it alters the properties of soil (Amiri et al. 2015).

The evaluation of salinity risk in irrigation water is conducted through the measurement of EC, while the assessment of sodium toxicity in relation to calcium and magnesium in irrigation water is determined by SAR. In the Wilcox diagram, SAR is plotted on the x-axis and the EC is plotted on the y-axis to classify irrigation water quality. The Wilcox diagram divides the plot into zones of excellent, good, permissible, doubtful, and unsuitable water quality for irrigation. The Wilcox diagram illustrated that all water samples fall into the C1-S1 category demonstrating low salinity and low alkali hazards (Figure 3). It is suitable for most crops and soil where leaching predominates.
Figure 3

Wilcox diagram showing canal water quality in the context of salinity and sodium hazard.

Figure 3

Wilcox diagram showing canal water quality in the context of salinity and sodium hazard.

Close modal
Piper's trilinear diagram (Piper 1944) is one of the classic methods to represent major hydrochemical facies in the form of graphical representation. A diamond-shaped chart that comprises two triangular fields is used to depict the proportions of cations (Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+) and anions (CO32−, HCO3, SO42−Cl), which are expressed in meq/L. For cations, the triangle has 100% Ca2+ in the left, 100% Na+ + K+ in the right, and 100% Mg2+ toward upward. For anions, it has 100% carbonates and bicarbonates to the left, 100% Cl to the right, and 100% sulfate toward the top. The Piper's diagrams were plotted for premonsoon, postmonsoon, and monsoon separately (Figure 4). In the premonsoon days, surface water can be divided into two categories: (i) 10% of the sample was of Mg-HCO3 and (ii) 90% of the water samples were of mixed type.
Figure 4

Piper plot showing the hydrochemical facies of surface water in (a) premonsoon, (b) monsoon, and (c) postmonsoon in the Hirakud reservoir and Bargarh main canal.

Figure 4

Piper plot showing the hydrochemical facies of surface water in (a) premonsoon, (b) monsoon, and (c) postmonsoon in the Hirakud reservoir and Bargarh main canal.

Close modal

In the present study, the water from the Hirakud reservoir and Bargarh main canal was found to be slightly alkaline. Factor analysis suggested that geogenic and anthropogenic activities could combinedly affect the irrigation water quality. Irrigation water from the reservoir and main canal was found to be suitable for irrigation in terms of salinity, SAR, % Na, and MH. However, most of the water samples came under bad category in terms of their high RSC value, indicating the dominance of bicarbonate ions in the irrigation water. Trace metal concentration in the water was found to be above the permissible limit across the seasons. The ongoing unregulated disposal of industrial, municipal, as well as agricultural waste directly to the Mahanadi River and Hirakud reservoir without prior treatment could lead to the deterioration of water quality. This could be a potential threat to hectares of irrigated land in the command area as poor-quality water negatively affects soil health, crop quality, and productivity.

The authors thank the Odisha State Higher Education Council, Odisha, for providing financial assistance under the MRIP Scheme (Sanction No. 426/190/OSHEC). Special thanks are due to the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, and NIT, Rourkela for providing infrastructural research facility for the analysis of heavy metals. Ms Syed Nikhat Ahmed thanks the Ministry of Minorities, Government of India for providing the Maulana Azad National Fellowship.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abbott
B. W.
,
Bishop
K.
,
Zarnetske
J. P.
,
Minaudo
C.
,
Chapin
F. S.
,
Krause
S.
&
Plont
S.
2019
Human domination of the global water cycle absent from depictions and perceptions
.
Nature Geoscience
12
(
7
),
533
540
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0374-y
.
Abuzaid
A. S.
&
Jahin
H. S.
2022
Combinations of multivariate statistical analysis and analytical hierarchical process for indexing surface water quality under arid conditions
.
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
248
,
104005
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104005
.
Acharya
A.
,
Sharma
M. L.
&
Bishwakarma
K.
2020
Chemical characteristics of the Karmanasha river water and its appropriateness for irrigational usage
.
Journal of Nepal Chemical Society
41
,
94
102
.
https://doi.org/10.3126/jncs.v41i1.30494
.
Adejumobi
M. A.
,
Ojediran
J. O.
&
Onafua
O. E.
2022
Impact of irrigation practices on soil physicochemical properties of Josepdam Irrigation Scheme
.
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
23
(
2
),
29
39
.
https://doi.org/10.9734/JERR/2022/v23i217594
.
Amiri
V.
,
Sohrabi
N.
&
Dadgar
M. A.
2015
Evaluation of groundwater chemistry and its suitability for drinking and agricultural uses in the Lenjanat plain, central Iran
.
Environmental Earth Science
74
(
7
),
6163
6176
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4638-6
.
APHA, American Public Health Association
1995
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
, 19th edn.
American Public Health Association
,
Washington, DC
.
Ayari
J.
,
Barbieri
M.
,
Agnan
Y.
,
Sellemi
A.
,
Braham
A.
,
Dhaha
F.
&
Charef
A.
2021
Trace element contamination in the mine-affected stream sediments of Oued Rarai in north-western Tunisia: A river basin scale assessment
.
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Open Access
43
(
10
),
4027
4042
.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10653-021-00887-1
.
Ayari
J.
,
Barbieri
M.
,
Boschetti
T.
,
Barhoumi
A.
,
Sellami
A.
,
Braham
A.
,
Manai
F.
,
Dhaha
F.
&
Charef
A.
2023
Major- and trace-element geochemistry of geothermal water from the Nappe Zone, Northern Tunisia: Implications for mineral prospecting and health risk assessment
.
Environments – MDPI Open Access
10
(
9
),
151
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10090151
.
Ayers
R. S.
&
Westcot
D. W.
1994
Water Quality for Agriculture
.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
,
Rome, Italy
.
Aziz
H. A.
,
Abu Amr
S. S.
,
Hung
Y.
,
2021
Surface water quality and analysis
. In:
Integrated Natural Resources Management
(
Wang
L. K.
,
Wang
M.-H. S.
,
Hung
Y.-T.
&
Shammas
N. K.
eds.).
Springer International Publishing
,
Berlin
, pp.
63
113
.
Banerjee
R.
&
Ghosh
A. R.
2016
Spatio-temporal analysis of water quality trends in the middle stretch of the river Damodar
.
International Journal of Science and Technology Research
2
(
6
),
191
198
.
Bastia
F.
,
Equeenuddin
S. M.
,
Roy
P. D.
&
Hernández-Mendiola
E.
2020
Geochemical signatures of surface sediments from the Mahanadi river basin (India): Chemical weathering, provenance, and tectonic settings
.
Geological Journal
55
(
7
),
5294
5307
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3746
.
Bouderbala
A.
2015
Assessment of groundwater quality and its suitability for agricultural uses in the Nador Plain, north of Algeria
.
Water Quality, Exposure and Health
7
(
4
),
445
457
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0160-z
.
Brindha
K.
,
Vaman
K. N.
,
Srinivasan
K.
,
Babu
M. S.
&
Elango
L.
2013
Identification of surface water groundwater interaction by hydrogeochemical indicators and assessing its suitability for drinking and irrigational purposes in Chennai, Southern India
.
Applied Water Science
4
(
2
),
159
174
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0138-6
.
Dhar
A.
,
Sahoo
S.
&
Mandal
U.
2014
Hydro-environmental assessment of a regional groundwater aquifer: Hirakud command area (India)
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
73
(
8
),
4165
4178
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3703-x
.
Doneen
L. D.
1964
Notes on water quality in agriculture. In: Water Science and Engineering, Paper 4001. Dept. of Water, Science and Engineering,
University of California
,
Davis, USA
.
Eaton
F. M.
1950
Significance of carbonates in irrigation waters
.
Soil Science
39
,
123
133
.
Etteieb
S.
,
Cherif
S.
&
Tarhouni
J.
2017
Hydrochemical assessment of water quality for irrigation: A case study of the Medjerda River in Tunisia
.
Applied. Water Science
7
(
1
),
469
480
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0265-3
.
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization
2003
Review of World Water Resources by Country
.
Water Reports 23
.
FAO
,
Rome, Italy
, p.
110
.
Ghazaryan
K.
&
Chen
Y.
2016
Hydrochemical assessment of surface water for irrigation purposes and its influence on soil salinity in Tikanlik Oasis, China
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
75
(
5
),
1
15
.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12665-016-5287-0
.
Gibbs
R. J.
1970
Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry
.
Science
17
,
1088
1090
.
Gupta
S.
,
Nayek
S.
&
Chakraborty
D.
2016
Hydrochemical evaluation of Rangit River, Sikkim, India: Using water quality index and multivariate statistics
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
75
(
7
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5223-8
.
Haidary
A.
,
Amiri
B. J.
,
Adamowski
J.
,
Fohrer
N.
&
Nakane
K.
2013
Assessing the impacts of four land use types on the water quality of wetlands in Japan
.
Water Resources Management
27
(
7
),
2217
2229
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0284-5
.
Hussain
J.
,
Dubey
A.
,
Hussain
I.
&
Arif
M.
2020
Surface water quality assessment concerning trace metals in River Mahanadi and its tributaries
.
India Applied Water Science
10
(
193
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01277-1
.
Jain
S. K.
,
Agarwal
P. K.
&
Singh
V. P.
2007
Hydrology and Water Resources of India
.
Springer Science & Business Media
,
Berlin
, p.
57
.
Kar
P. K.
,
Pani
K. R.
,
Pattanayak
S. K.
&
Sahu
S. K.
2010
Seasonal variation in physico-chemical and microbiological parameters of Mahanadi River water in and Around Hirakud, Orissa (India)
.
The Ecoscan
4
(
4
),
263
271
.
Khadka
U. R.
&
Ramanathan
A.
2013
Major ion composition and seasonal variation in the Lesser Himalayan lake: case of Begnas Lake of the Pokhara Valley, Nepal
.
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
6
(
11
),
4191
4206
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0677-4
.
Kumari
P.
2017
Irrigation water quality based on hydrochemical analysis of Ganga-Sone divide region of Bihar
.
Asian Journal of Water, Environment, and Pollution
14
(
3
),
75
83
.
https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-170028
.
Li
P.
,
Qian
H.
&
Wu
J.
2018
Conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water to reduce soil salinization in the Yinchuan Plain, North-West China
.
International Journal of Water Resources Development
34
(
3
),
337
353
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1443059
.
Masoud
A. A.
2013
Spatio-temporal evaluation of the groundwater quality in Kafr Al-Zayat District, Egypt
.
Hydrological Processes
27
(
20
),
2987
3002
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9765
.
Mukherjee
A.
2020
Seasonal variations of zooplankton diversity in fresh water reservoir of West Bengal, India
.
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
13
(
20
),
1991
1997
.
https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v13i20.556
.
Nguyen
T. G.
,
Phan
K. T.
&
Huhnh
T. H. N.
2022
Application of integrated-weight water quality index in groundwater quality evaluation
.
Civil Engineering Journal
8
(
11
),
2661
2674
.
https://doi.org/ 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-11-020
.
Panda
S. N.
,
Raul
S. K.
&
Hollaender
H.
2014
Sustainability of rice-dominated cropping system in the Hirakud canal command, Orissa, India
.
Irrigation and Drainage.
57
,
93
104
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.351
.
Piper
A.
1944
A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis
.
Transactions of the American Geophysical Union
35
,
914
923
.
Raghunath
H. M.
1987
Groundwater
.
New Age International (P) Ltd. Publishers
,
Delhi, India
.
Raji
V. R.
&
Packialakshmi
S.
2022
Assessing the wastewater pollutants retaining for a soil aquifer treatment using batch column experiments
.
Civil Engineering Journal
8
(
7
),
1482
1149
.
https://doi.org/ 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-07-011
.
Rath
A.
&
Swain
P.
2018
Evaluation of the performance of irrigation canals using benchmarking techniques – A case study of Hirakud dam canal system, Odisha, India
.
ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
18
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1439777
.
Reddy
S.
,
Gupta
H.
,
Reddy
D.
&
Kumar
D.
2020
The suitability of surface waters from small west-flowing rivers for drinking, irrigation, and aquatic life from a global biodiversity hotspot (Western Ghats, India)
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
28
(
29
),
38613
38628
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13154-8
.
Richards
L. A.
1954
Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils
.
USDA, Agriculture Handbook, 60
.
United States Salinity Laboratory
,
Washington
.
Sahu
A. K.
,
Dun dung
M. S.
,
Sahoo
S. K.
,
Mir
S. A.
,
Nayak
B.
&
Baitharu
I.
2023
Ecological and human health risk associated with heavy metals in sediments and bioaccumulation in some commercially important fishes in Mahanadi River, Odisha, India
.
Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology
5
,
168
177
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2023.08.001
.
Singh
S.
,
Ghosh
N. C.
&
Gurjar
S.
2018
Index-based assessment of the suitability of water quality for irrigation purpose under Indian conditions
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
190
(
1
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6407-3
.
Sundaray
S. K.
,
Nayak
B. B.
&
Bhatta
D.
2009
Environmental studies on river water quality with reference to suitability for agricultural purposes: Mahanadi river estuarine system, India – A case study
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
155
(
1–4
),
227
243
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0431-2
Sundaray
S. K.
,
Panda
U. C.
,
Nayak
B. B.
&
Bhatta
D.
2006
Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of the Mahanadi River–estuarine system (India)—a case study
.
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
28
(
331
),
317
330
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s1065 3-005-9001-5
.
Sundaray
S. K.
,
Nayak
B. B.
&
Bhatta
D.
2012
Environmental studies on river water quality concerning suitability for agricultural purposes: Mahanadi River estuarine system, India – A case study
.
Environmental Monitoring Assessment
155
,
227
243
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s1066 1-008-0431-2
.
Tayyab
M.
,
Abbas
Y.
&
Hussain
M. W.
2022
Management options for large metropolitans on the verge of a water stress
.
Journal of Human, Earth, and Future
3
(
3
),
333
344
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2022-03-03-06
.
Thomas
J.
,
Joseph
S.
&
Thrivikramji
K. P.
2015
Hydrochemical variations of a tropical mountain river system in a rain shadow region of the southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India
.
Applied Geochemistry
63
,
456
471
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.03.018
.
U.S. Salinity Laboratory (USSL)
1954
Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soil;. USSA Handbook
60
,
160
.
Wada
Y.
,
Wisser
D.
&
Bierkens
M. F. P.
2014
Global modeling of withdrawal, allocation and consumptive use of surface water and groundwater resources
.
Earth System Dynamic
5
(
1
),
15
40
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-15-2014
.
WHO, World Health Organization
2006
Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta, and Greywater
, 3rd edn.
Volume II: Wastewater Use in Agriculture
.
WHO
,
Geneva, Switzerland
.
Wilcox
L. V.
1955
Classification and use of the irrigation waters, U.S. Department of Agriculture Circular No 969 (p 19),
Washington, District of Columbia
.
Zaman
M.
,
Shahid
S. A.
&
Heng
L.
2018
Guideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques
.
Springer International Publishing
,
New York, USA
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96190-3
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).