Local scour is one of the main causes of the bridge collapse. It occurs when the flow erodes the sediments surrounding the bridge's piers. This experimental study aims to find an innovative approach for armoring the bed using nano clay to mitigate the erodibility of non-uniform sand beds. Additionally, the study investigates the nano clay-sand bed under various hydraulic conditions, with different pier diameters to determine the optimal nano clay ratio for minimizing local scour around a cylindrical bridge pier. This study indicates that the nano clay could be used effectively to reduce the local scour depth, with an optimum ratio of 0.25% when the flow shallowness is less than 1.4 and an optimum ratio of 0.5% for the flow shallowness between 1.4 and 2. Notably, a significant reduction of up to 68% in local scour depth is observed out of all experiments. Furthermore, the study demonstrates the influence of nano clay on other factors related to local scour depth. It presents a predictive equation that can be used to estimate the depth of local scour in a bed composed of nano clay and non-uniform sand. This equation is derived from the obtained data from this experimental investigation.

  • Investigate the effect of adding nano clay to sand in reducing local scour around a bridge pier in different flow conditions.

  • Determine the optimum ratio of nano clay in case of mixing with non-uniform sand.

  • Determine the mathematical equation for predicting the magnitude of local scour depth in scenarios involving the combination of nano clay and not uniform sand.

Local scour is a natural phenomenon that occurs when erosive forces remove sediments from the area surrounding a structure or obstacle in a river approach. Local scour is a complex and severe issue that can be considered as one of the causes of bridge collapse (Breusers et al. 1977; Richardson & Davis 2001a; Ali & Günal 2021; Alasta et al. 2022). The mechanism of local scour is characterized by the three-dimensional flow; specifically, the horseshoe vortex develops around the base of the pier facing upstream due to the downward flows. Additionally, wake vortices emerge in the region downstream of the pier (Moncada-M et al. 2009; Ismael et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017; Liang et al. 2020). The mechanism of local scour is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Mechanism of local scour.

Figure 1

Mechanism of local scour.

Close modal

Numerous scholars employed laboratory experimental prototyping to study the scour mechanism and its primary factors, which were classified as hydraulic, geotechnical, and structural. Hydraulic variables include shear velocity, mean velocity, Reynold number, and Froude number. Geotechnical factors include sediment density, coarseness, size, homogeneity, and sediment motion. Finally, the structural aspect consists of the pier's shape and diameter (Raudkivi & Ettema 1977, 1985; Baker 1980; Chiew 1984; Melville & Sutherland 1988; Dargahi 1989; Salim & Jones 1996; Ettema et al. 1998; Melville & Coleman 2000; Roulund et al. 2005; Zhao et al. 2010; Baykal et al. 2015; Liang et al. 2020).

In the past few decades, comprehensive investigations have been carried out on the occurrence of local scour with varying types of sediment beds, such as sand beds (non-cohesive sediment), clay or silt beds (cohesive sediment), and mixed beds (sand-clay beds).

In terms of the sand beds (non-cohesive sediment), the studies reached a deep comprehension of the behavior and mechanisms of the local scour within non-cohesive beds, and several equations have been developed to calculate the local scour depth in sand beds (non-cohesive sediment). Furthermore, researchers have developed several experimental methodologies to simulate local scour as well as developed artificial intelligence models for predicting this phenomenon (Raudkivi & Ettema 1977, 1985; Baker 1980; Chiew 1984; Melville & Sutherland 1988; Dargahi 1989; Salim & Jones 1996; Ettema et al. 1998; Melville & Coleman 2000; Roulund et al. 2005; Moncada-M et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2010; Baykal et al. 2015; Ismael et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017; Liang et al. 2020).

On the other hand, numerous inquiries have been conducted to examine the phenomenon of local scour in clay and silt (cohesive beds). Scholarly investigations have provided valuable insights into the fundamental features of fine-grained (cohesive sediment). Cohesive sediments are influenced by electromagnetic and electrostatic inter-particle forces, which lead to the formation of tightly bonded particles. Therefore, the duration of the equilibrium stage of the local scour in cohesive sediments is longer than in sand (non-cohesive sediment). Moreover, erosion in cohesive sediments can happen either through individual particles or clusters of particles. In contrast, non-cohesive sediments can erode particle by particle, causing a rapid increase in the depth of local scour (Rambabu et al. 2003; Sumer et al. 2007; Debnath & Chaudhuri 2010; Abou-Seida et al. 2012; Najafzadeh & Barani 2014; Zhang et al. 2022).

In recent times, researchers have shown a growing interest in studying the impact of fine particles mixed with sand on the behavior of local scour (Mitchener & Torfs 1996; Van Ledden et al. 2004; Debnath & Chaudhuri 2010, 2011; Chaudhuri et al. 2022). The researchers utilized fine particles, known as cohesive sediment, consisting of clay and silt with particle sizes smaller than 36 μm (Debnath & Chaudhuri 2010). Studies have shown that mixing the fine particles with sand can change the sediment transport mode from cohesionless to cohesive, decreasing the depth of local scour due to the increasing inner friction between sand particles. The resistance to erosion of the sand and fine particle mixture is most noticeable when the fraction of fine particles is low (Mitchener & Torfs 1996; Van Ledden et al. 2004; Debnath & Chaudhuri 2010, 2011). According to Debnath & Chaudhuri (2010), the scour depth was found to be higher when finer sand was used in clay-sand mixtures compared to coarser sand. Chaudhuri & Debnath (2013) stated that the local scour decreases as the clay ratio increases. However, after reaching a clay ratio of 0.5, the local scour increases with a further increase in the clay ratio. Chaudhuri et al. (2022) found that mixing clay with medium sand particles was more effective in reducing the local scour hole size than mixing clay with fine sand.

Previous studies have primarily focused on using clay particles that are micro-sized. However, no research has been carried out to examine the impact of nanomaterials on local scour. The objective of this study was to enhance the current understanding of how a mixture of nano clay and sand affects the depth of local scour around a cylindrical pier. The main goal was to examine how various pier diameters and flow depths affect the nano clay-sand bed. In addition, the study aimed to determine the optimal ratio of nano clay. Furthermore, a predictive model was developed to estimate the potential for local scour in the nano clay-sand bed.

Experiments setting

The experiments were conducted at a hydraulic laboratory in Gaziantep University. The flume's dimensions were 80 cm wide, 9 m long, and 90 cm deep; the flume's cross-section is rectangular with glass-sided sides, and the bed is steel, with constant elevation. The dimensions of the test section are 1.5 m long and 20 cm depth. The ramp was placed in front of the test section and at the end to generate a fully developed flow. The sediment level and scour depth were measured using a laser range finder. A tailgate was used at the flume's end to regulate water depth. A single pier was placed in the middle of the sediment bed, and the flow rate was measured using an electromagnetic flowmeter. Figure 2 illustrates the experimental setup.
Figure 2

Schematic layout of the flume.

Figure 2

Schematic layout of the flume.

Close modal
Figure 3

Sieve analysis of sand.

Figure 3

Sieve analysis of sand.

Close modal

Characteristics of the sediments and the flow condition

In order to determine the characteristics of sand, a mechanical sieve examination was conducted in accordance with the ASTM standards (C136-01 2001). The results of the analysis indicate that the median grain size d50 is 1.4 mm, as shown in Figure 3. The geometric standard deviation of particles σg, was determined to be 2.39. This value was calculated using the formula σg = d84/d50, based on the uniformity conditions stated by Dey et al. (1995), the sand that was used in this study can be categorized as non-uniform due to the standard deviation of sediment particle size (σg) being greater than 1.4. Furthermore, according to Raudkivi & Ettema (1983) classification, the sand type can be identified as non-ripple-forming sediments because the d50 value is greater than or equal to 0.7 mm.
Figure 4

Comparison between measured and calculated data of the scour depth.

Figure 4

Comparison between measured and calculated data of the scour depth.

Close modal

Nano clay (Montmorillonite) was utilized in this investigation, which exhibits various unique characteristics that make it a highly appropriate substrate for engineering applications based on nanotechnology. Norhasri et al. (2017) identified various significant characteristics of nano clay, such as stability, interlayer spacing, high hydration, swelling capacity, and strong chemical reactivity. Table 1 presents a comprehensive overview of the parameters associated with both the sand and nano clay.

Table 1

The characteristics of the materials

MaterialsParametersValue
Sand Bulk density 1,660 kg/m3 
The median size d50 1.4 mm 
Specific gravity Gs 2.65 
Standard deviation 2.39 
Nano clay (Montmorillonite) Form Powder 
Purity 99% 
Color White 
Particle size 800 nm 
Density 2.7 g/cm3 
Specific gravity Gn 2.6 
MaterialsParametersValue
Sand Bulk density 1,660 kg/m3 
The median size d50 1.4 mm 
Specific gravity Gs 2.65 
Standard deviation 2.39 
Nano clay (Montmorillonite) Form Powder 
Purity 99% 
Color White 
Particle size 800 nm 
Density 2.7 g/cm3 
Specific gravity Gn 2.6 

A single cylindrical pier with three different diameters (3, 5, and 7.5 cm) was used in this study. According to Chiew & Melville (1987), the ratio between the flume width and the pier diameters should be B/D > 10. Therefore, the pier diameters were carefully selected to ensure that the channel wall does not have a significant impact on scouring. The experimental methodology entailed utilizing one flow rate and three different flow depths, as listed in Table 2.

Table 2

Experiment parameters

Parameters
Discharge (m3/s) 0.032 
Flow depth (cm) 5.7 7.55 9.1 
Mean velocity (m/s) 0.701 0.529 0.439 
Reynolds number Re 3,341.34 3,267.65 3,164.38 
Froude number Fr 0.9374 0.6146 0.4646 
Pier Reynolds number Rep (*10520.4 34 51.1 15.4 25.7 38.5 12.8 21.3 32 
V/Vc 1.816 1.308 1.059 
The thickness of the sediments (cm) 20 
Parameters
Discharge (m3/s) 0.032 
Flow depth (cm) 5.7 7.55 9.1 
Mean velocity (m/s) 0.701 0.529 0.439 
Reynolds number Re 3,341.34 3,267.65 3,164.38 
Froude number Fr 0.9374 0.6146 0.4646 
Pier Reynolds number Rep (*10520.4 34 51.1 15.4 25.7 38.5 12.8 21.3 32 
V/Vc 1.816 1.308 1.059 
The thickness of the sediments (cm) 20 

The flow regime through the cylindrical pier (vortex shedding of a pier) can be classified as (a laminar boundary layer that has undergone turbulent transition) as the 3*105 < Rep < 3.5*106 and (turbulent vortex street unsteady flow) as 3.5*106 < Rep. The phenomenon of vortex shedding in a pier can be mathematically represented as a function of the Reynolds number, denoted by the equation Rep = VD/μ (Schlichting & Kestin 1961; Lienhard 1966; Chandrasekaran 2020). The proposed equation by Richardson & Davis (2001b) was used to calculate the Vc critical shear velocity:
(1)
where is the critical shear stress, h is the flow depth, is the water density, g is the acceleration due to gravity, n is the Manning’ s coefficient.

Experimental procedure

In order to examine the impact of nano clay on the mitigation of scour depth around cylindrical bridge piers, a series of experiments were conducted. The experimental procedure was as follows: A sediment bed was prepared for the test area, measuring 150 cm in length, 20 cm in depth, and 80 cm in width. In the middle of this area, a pier was installed and its verticality was checked to prevent any slope influence on the vortex. Subsequently, the section was filled with sediment and leveled using a scraper. A laser range finder was utilized to measure the bed's dimensions.

The experiments started with a slow flow rate to gradually achieve the required flow depth and ensure any air bubbles were expelled from the sediments, guaranteeing full saturation. The flow depth was regulated using a tailgate. Afterward, the necessary discharge rate was pumped, and an electromagnetic flowmeter monitored the flow, controlled via a valve. During the final phase of the experiments, once the local scour equilibrium was reached, the water was drained slowly to prevent any alterations in the bed's topography. The contours of the bed were then measured using a laser range finder.

Preparing the nano clay-sand bed

The main challenge encountered during this investigation was determining the most effective method for adding nano clay into the sand. The main objective was to find the most efficient method for achieving a homogeneous mixture of these two materials. The wet mixing approach was applied in this study, particularly using the absolute volume approach. This approach assumes that the total volume of the mixture is equal to the combined absolute volumes of its components, which include sand, nano clay, and water, as proposed by Ibrahim et al. (2022). The mixing equation used is as follows:
(2)

When Ms, Mn, and Mw are the mass of the sand, nano clay, and water, respectively, and Gs and Gn are the specific gravity of the sand and nano clay, respectively. The mixing ratios were 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1%.

The process of mixing the nano clay into the sand involved several steps. First, the quantities of sand, nano clay, and water were determined using Equation (2). Next, a solution of nano clay was prepared by adding it to water and using a high-speed mixing machine. The resulting solution was then added to the sand, and both components were mixed together using a steel trowel for a duration of 30 min until a uniform color was observed. Afterward, the mixture was left for 24 h to ensure proper distribution and prevent additional water absorption, as Debnath et al. (2007) recommended. Finally, the mixture was applied to the test section in layers, with each layer being 5 cm deep. The layers were mixed using a steel trowel without compaction. This systematic approach ensured a controlled and precise methodology for mixing the nano clay into the sand.

The Buckingham method was applied to identify the variables that significantly impact the magnitude of the local scour depth near a bridge pier. The identified variables that show the most significance are as follows:
(3)
where is the depth of local scour (cm), h is the flow depth (cm), is the mean velocity (m/s), D is the pier diameter (cm), is the standard deviation of particle size, is the median particle size (mm), is the water density (kg/m3), is the sediment density (kg/m3), g is the gravitation acceleration (m/s2), is the dynamic viscosity of water (K/m s), is the mass of sand (kg), and is the mass of nano clay (kg).
After applying the Buckingham method to Equation (3), we can conclude:
(4)

Rearranging Equation (3) by substitute Froude number Fr = V/(gh)0.5, pier Reynolds number Re = DVρ/μ, SS is the specific gravity of sediment = (ρs)/ρ. By combining some terms, we can obtain that, firstly, the mass of sand with the mass of nano clay () and it can be written as the proportions of the mixture Mr = Second, by recombining and rearranging of the specific gravity of sediment SS, and the flow Froude number Fr, it can be expressed as sediment densimetric Froude number .

So, the final equation can be written as follows:
(5)

This study included a series of 45 experiments. The experimental setup consisted of control tests involving a sand bed, as well as a second phase involving a nano clay-sand bed. The findings of these experiments, including specific details, can be found in Table 3.

Table 3

Summary of the results

RunD (cm)h (cm)Nano clay (%)V (m/s)ds (cm)Reduction (%)
CD3H1 5.7 0.701 4.45 
NC1D3H1 0.25 1.60 64 
NC2D3H1 0.5 2.39 47 
NC3D3H1 0.75 2.67 41 
NC4D3H1 2.94 35 
CD3H2 7.55 0.529 3.4 
NC1D3H2 0.25 1.14 66 
NC2D3H2 0.5 1.64 52 
NC3D3H2 0.75 1.78 48 
NC4D3H2 2.05 40 
CD3H3 9.1 0.439 1.83 
NC1D3H3 0.25 0.58 68 
NC2D3H3 0.5 0.84 54 
NC3D3H3 0.75 0.89 51 
NC4D3H3 0.95 48 
CD5H1 5.7 0.701 8.35 
NC1D5H1 0.25 4.93 41 
NC2D5H1 0.5 5.61 33 
NC3D5H1 0.75 6.19 26 
NC4D5H1 6.24 25 
CD5H2 7.55 0.529 5.35 
NC1D5H2 0.25 3.03 43 
NC2D5H2 0.5 3.55 34 
NC3D5H2 0.75 3.95 26 
NC4D5H2 4.03 25 
CD5H3 9.1 0.439 3.07 
NC1D5H3 0.25 1.60 47.9 
NC2D5H3 0.5 1.97 36 
NC3D5H3 0.75 2.31 25 
NC4D5H3 2.46 20 
CD7H1 7.5 5.7 0.701 11.24 
NC1D7H1 0.25 10.13 9.88 
NC2D7H1 0.5 8.63 23 
NC3D7H1 0.75 9.94 12 
NC4D7H1 11.22 −0.2 
CD7H2 7.55 0.529 8.78 
NC1D7H2 0.25 7.4 16 
NC2D7H2 0.5 6.49 26.1 
NC3D7H2 0.75 6.72 23.5 
NC4D7H2 8.76 −0.2 
CD7H3 9.1 0.439 6.61 
NC1D7H3 0.25 5.135 22 
NC2D7H3 0.5 4.76 28 
NC3D7H3 0.75 4.95 25 
NC4D7H3 6.6 0.2 
RunD (cm)h (cm)Nano clay (%)V (m/s)ds (cm)Reduction (%)
CD3H1 5.7 0.701 4.45 
NC1D3H1 0.25 1.60 64 
NC2D3H1 0.5 2.39 47 
NC3D3H1 0.75 2.67 41 
NC4D3H1 2.94 35 
CD3H2 7.55 0.529 3.4 
NC1D3H2 0.25 1.14 66 
NC2D3H2 0.5 1.64 52 
NC3D3H2 0.75 1.78 48 
NC4D3H2 2.05 40 
CD3H3 9.1 0.439 1.83 
NC1D3H3 0.25 0.58 68 
NC2D3H3 0.5 0.84 54 
NC3D3H3 0.75 0.89 51 
NC4D3H3 0.95 48 
CD5H1 5.7 0.701 8.35 
NC1D5H1 0.25 4.93 41 
NC2D5H1 0.5 5.61 33 
NC3D5H1 0.75 6.19 26 
NC4D5H1 6.24 25 
CD5H2 7.55 0.529 5.35 
NC1D5H2 0.25 3.03 43 
NC2D5H2 0.5 3.55 34 
NC3D5H2 0.75 3.95 26 
NC4D5H2 4.03 25 
CD5H3 9.1 0.439 3.07 
NC1D5H3 0.25 1.60 47.9 
NC2D5H3 0.5 1.97 36 
NC3D5H3 0.75 2.31 25 
NC4D5H3 2.46 20 
CD7H1 7.5 5.7 0.701 11.24 
NC1D7H1 0.25 10.13 9.88 
NC2D7H1 0.5 8.63 23 
NC3D7H1 0.75 9.94 12 
NC4D7H1 11.22 −0.2 
CD7H2 7.55 0.529 8.78 
NC1D7H2 0.25 7.4 16 
NC2D7H2 0.5 6.49 26.1 
NC3D7H2 0.75 6.72 23.5 
NC4D7H2 8.76 −0.2 
CD7H3 9.1 0.439 6.61 
NC1D7H3 0.25 5.135 22 
NC2D7H3 0.5 4.76 28 
NC3D7H3 0.75 4.95 25 
NC4D7H3 6.6 0.2 

The results of the control tests were analyzed by comparing them with four equations obtained from relevant literature, which are listed in Table 4. The purpose of this comparison was to assess the calibration of the experimental measurements. Careful consideration was given to the selection of these equations to ensure that all parameters being investigated were appropriately addressed. Figure 4 presents a comparison between the calculated and measured data, along with an error band of approximately ±30%. Based on this analysis, it can be concluded that the control test data are deemed acceptable and has been validated through the comparison with data obtained from the equations.

Table 4

Scour equations

ReferenceEquations
Equation (3) of Raeisi & Ghomeshi (2020)   
Equation (8) of Raeisi & Ghomeshi (2020)   
HEC-18/Jones equation (Richardson & Davis 2001b 
HEC-18/Mueller equation (Mueller 1996 with modified K4 
ReferenceEquations
Equation (3) of Raeisi & Ghomeshi (2020)   
Equation (8) of Raeisi & Ghomeshi (2020)   
HEC-18/Jones equation (Richardson & Davis 2001b 
HEC-18/Mueller equation (Mueller 1996 with modified K4 

K1 is the pier shape's correction factor, K2 is the flow direction's correction factor, K3 is the bed's correction factor, and K4 is the armoring of the coarse bed's correction factor (Mueller 1996; Richardson & Davis 2001b).

The effect of the nano clay

The present study aimed to investigate the impact of nano clay on scour depth. To achieve this objective, various ratios of nano clay were mixed with a non-uniform sand bed under different hydraulic conditions with three pier diameters. The results of the experiments are summarized in Table 3 and visually represented in Figure 5. The study investigated the varying ratios of nano clay to sand, which were 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1%.
Figure 5

The relation between the proportion of nano clay and local scour depth. (a) The relation between local scour depth ds, the nano clay and flow depth h, and the ratio of reduction in the case of 3 cm diameter. (b) The relation between local scour depth ds, the nano clay and flow depth h, and the ratio of reduction in the case of 5 cm diameter. (c) The relation between local scour depth ds, the nano clay and flow depth h, and the ratio of reduction in the case of 7.5 cm diameter.

Figure 5

The relation between the proportion of nano clay and local scour depth. (a) The relation between local scour depth ds, the nano clay and flow depth h, and the ratio of reduction in the case of 3 cm diameter. (b) The relation between local scour depth ds, the nano clay and flow depth h, and the ratio of reduction in the case of 5 cm diameter. (c) The relation between local scour depth ds, the nano clay and flow depth h, and the ratio of reduction in the case of 7.5 cm diameter.

Close modal

Figure 5 demonstrates that the minimum scour depth was observed for a 3 cm pier diameter when utilizing 0.25% nano clay across all flow depths. The reduction in scour depth reached up to 68, 66, and 64% for flow depths of 9.1, 7.55, and 5.7 cm, respectively, compared to the control test with 0% nano clay. However, it was observed that increasing the ratio of nano clay beyond the optimal proportion resulted in an increase in scour depth. Similar trends were observed when the pier diameter was increased to 5 cm, with the minimum scour depth observed at 0.25% nano clay. The highest reduction values were 48, 43, and 41% for flow depths of 9.1, 7.55, and 5.7 cm, respectively. Overall, the addition of nano clay had a significant impact on reducing the depth of scour, with the optimal reduction achieved at a concentration of 0.25% nano clay. However, as the concentration increased to 1% nano clay, the effectiveness decreased, resulting in a reduction of 25–20% in scour depth.

For a pier diameter of 7.5 cm, the optimal ratio of nano clay was found to be 0.5%. Implementing this ratio resulted in a reduction of local scour by 28, 26.1, and 23.2% for flow depths of 9.1, 7.55, and 5.7 cm, respectively. It was observed that increasing the ratio of nano clay gradually increased the reduction in local scour until reaching the optimal ratio. Beyond this point, the reduction ratio decreased significantly, resulting in local scour depths comparable to the reference tests with 0% nano clay. These findings are visually depicted in Figures 5 and 6.
Figure 6

The local scour hole for the cases: (a) NC2D7H1, (b) NC2D7H2, and (c) NC2D7H3.

Figure 6

The local scour hole for the cases: (a) NC2D7H1, (b) NC2D7H2, and (c) NC2D7H3.

Close modal
It is crucial to highlight that non-uniform-cohesionless sand was utilized in this study. It is widely recognized that such sediments have a high erodibility, leading to rapid increases in scour depth until reaching equilibrium scour. This behavior is attributed to the particle-by-particle movement exhibited by the sediments, as observed in the control tests (0% nano clay) shown in Figure 7. Wang et al. (2017) have reported similar findings.
Figure 7

Observed local scour depth (ds) over time (min). (a) The development of the local scour depth ds with time in the case of 3 cm diameter. (b) The development of the local scour depth ds with time in the case of 5 cm diameter. (c) The development of the local scour depth ds with time in the case of 7.5 cm diameter.

Figure 7

Observed local scour depth (ds) over time (min). (a) The development of the local scour depth ds with time in the case of 3 cm diameter. (b) The development of the local scour depth ds with time in the case of 5 cm diameter. (c) The development of the local scour depth ds with time in the case of 7.5 cm diameter.

Close modal

However, the utilization of nano clay–non-uniform sand bed has demonstrated a significant ability to mitigate erodibility and enhance the performance of sand in resisting local scour due to various factors, including enhanced molecular-scale physicochemical attractive forces, increased particle cohesion, higher inner sand fraction, formation of aggregates through particle collisions, and the role of fine sediment in controlling transport, deposition, and erosion, which was also indicated by Debnath & Chaudhuri (2011). Al-Shayea (2001) found that adding a small proportion of clay to sand decreases the mixture's permeability, while a higher percentage of clay significantly increases permeability. Due to the high permeability ratio, it was also found that once the optimal nano clay content is reached, the resistance of the sediment to local scour decreases.

Overall, according to the experimental results, it can be stated that the optimum ratio of nano clay in the non-uniform sand is between 0.25 and 0.5%. This range closely aligns with the proportion of fine sediments (d16) in the used sand (coarse sand), (d16) is 0.5% of the total used sand volume. The mix of nano clay and coarse sand has proven to be highly effective. This observation aligns with the findings presented by Debnath & Chaudhuri (2010) and Chaudhuri et al. (2022). Both studies also demonstrated the effectiveness of the clay-coarse sand bed.

Effect of the nano clay with scour factors

Numerous variables govern the local scour phenomenon. The influencing factors on the local scour depth in nano clay-sand beds were determined in this study by using dimensionless analysis. One of these factors is the flow shallowness h/D. The flow shallowness represents the relation between the flow depth and the pier diameter (Melville 2008). Melville & Coleman (2000) proposed a method for categorizing the flow depth and pier diameter relationship. By applying this methodology to the current investigation, there are two categories of flow shallowness; first, narrow width for all cases of using a 3 cm pier diameter, and for all runs of using 5 cm (excluded the 5.7 cm flow depth) since the h/D is less than 1.4 for the mentioned cases. Second, the 5 cm pier diameter experiments with flow 5.7 and 7.5 cm pier diameter can be classified as intermediate width since the h/D values are between 0.2 and 1.4. Figure 8 illustrates the relationship between ds/D and h/D, and it shows that the behavior of all cases is identical; it can be described as an inverse relationship; as the value of h/D increases, the local scour to the pier diameter ds/D decreases, for all cases. The reason for such behavior is the formation of a horseshoe vortex, which increases as the pier's diameter increases; with the flow depth decreasing, the horseshoe vortex primarily increases local scour depth.
Figure 8

The variation between ds/D and h/D based on the nano clay ratio. (a) 3 cm pier diameter. (b) 5 cm pier diameter. (c) 7.5 cm pier diameter.

Figure 8

The variation between ds/D and h/D based on the nano clay ratio. (a) 3 cm pier diameter. (b) 5 cm pier diameter. (c) 7.5 cm pier diameter.

Close modal
The dimensionless analysis showed that the densimetric Froude number Fr0 is the second factor that impacts the local scour, and it can be considered as a threshold to predict the initial motion of the sediments; many researchers proposed that Fr0 could be used accurately to predict sediment transport (Hager & Oliveto 2002; Aguirre-Pe et al. 2003; Williams et al. 2016). And it can be defined as the relationship between the inertial force that is acting on each particle and the specific weight of the particle when it is submerged. It governs the local scour the relationship between the ds/D and Fr0 is proportional, which is evident with increasing the Fr0 as shown n in Figure 9. The local scour value concerning diameter ds/D increased in the same observation of Williams et al. (2016).
Figure 9

The variation between ds/D and Fr0 based on the nano clay ratio. (a) 3 cm pier diameter. (b) 5 cm pier diameter. (c) 7.5 cm pier diameter.

Figure 9

The variation between ds/D and Fr0 based on the nano clay ratio. (a) 3 cm pier diameter. (b) 5 cm pier diameter. (c) 7.5 cm pier diameter.

Close modal

Additionally, the coarseness of the sediments D/d50 is the third factor that directly affects the local scour depth. It can be defined as the ratio between the diameter of the pier to the median size of the particles d50. The D/d50 values are 21.74, 35.71, and 53.2 for the pier diameters 3, 5, and 7.5 cm, respectively. Based on Ettema (1980), for the values of the coarseness of the sediments D/d50 < 50, the sediments can be considered coarse, which will increase in the dissipation of energy of the downflow along with the depth of the pier and porous between the particles resist the erosion force, and for D/d50 close to 50, the local scour depth will be in high value and that was observed in the case of 7.5 cm pier diameter.

Prediction of local scour depth

In order to anticipate the depth of local scour in nano clay-sand bed, a regression analysis was conducted using the variables outlined in Equation (4), which were determined through dimensional analysis. The relevant data are presented in Table 3, with runs that only involved sand being excluded from the analysis. The variables σg and Rep were disregarded due to insignificant exponents obtained from the multiple regression analyses. Consequently, Equation (5) is reduced to the following equation:
(6)
Based on the regression analysis, the following equation represents the depth of local scour in a nano clay-sand bed:
(7)
Statistical analysis was carried out to assess the results obtained from Equation (7). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) measures the degree of relationship between two variables for the observed value and the predicted value derived from Equation (7). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) is 0.9769, which indicates a high degree of consistency. The coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.95314, indicating a strong correlation and accurate predictions with low error since the root means square error (RMSE) is 0.083. Figure 10 displays these statistical results, which suggest that the model's predictions are highly correlated with the actual values. Therefore, the model is a suitable fit for the data, and Equation (7) can be utilized to predict the depth of local scour in scenarios where sand is mixed with nano clay.
Figure 10

Comparison between predicted and observed ds/D.

Figure 10

Comparison between predicted and observed ds/D.

Close modal

The present experimental study sought to investigate the effectiveness of nano clay particles in mitigating local scour around cylindrical bridge piers and study the behavior of the nano clay-sand bed. Hence, various factors were considered, such as pier diameters, flow depths, and different mixture ratios ranging from 0.25 to 1%. The findings of this study have significant implications for managing bridge pier scour. The use of nano clay was found to significantly affect the local scour mechanism and the depth of local scour is influenced by the proportion of nano clay used. One of the main findings is that a lower proportion of nano clay decreased local scour depth, whereas a higher proportion led to an increase. This suggests that considering an optimal mixing ratio of nano clay and sand could be an alternative solution for reducing the depth of pier scour.

Furthermore, the research findings indicated that a nano clay concentration of 0.25% is an optimal proportion for narrow piers having a flow shallowness (h/D) less than 1.4. This specific ratio led to a significant reduction in scour depth, with the maximum reduction in local scour depth being 68% for a pier diameter of 3 cm and 48% for a pier diameter of 5 cm. It is noteworthy that this optimal mixing ratio remained consistent for narrow piers. In contrast, for wide piers with a flow shallowness greater than 1.4 (h/D > 1.4), it was observed that the optimal mixing ratio of nano clay increased to 0.5%. This higher proportion led to a maximum reduction in local scour depth of 28% for a pier diameter of 7.5 cm.

Using nano clay for reducing scour depth around bridge piers offers several advantages. First, nano clay is a safe and environmentally friendly substance, with no observed negative side effects during the study. Second, it is a cost-effective solution that can be applied during the initial construction phase or as a remedial measure for existing structures using techniques such as jet grouting, permeation grouting, or deep soil mixing.

In conclusion, this study represents a significant step toward a sustainable and cost-effective solution for mitigating bridge pier scour. Further research in this field is expected to yield additional advancements and insights.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abou-Seida
M. M.
,
Elsaeed
G. H.
,
Mostafa
T. M.
&
Elzahry
E. F.
2012
Local scour at bridge abutments in cohesive soil
.
Journal of Hydraulic Research
50
(
2
),
171
180
.
Aguirre-Pe
J.
,
Olivero
M. ı. a. L.
&
Moncada
A. T.
2003
Particle densimetric Froude number for estimating sediment transport
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
129
(
6
),
428
437
.
Alasta
M. S.
,
Ali
A. S. A.
,
Ebrahimi
S.
,
Ashiq
M. M.
,
Dheyab
A. S.
,
AlMasri
A.
,
Alqatanani
A.
&
Khorram
M.
2022
Modeling of local scour depth around bridge pier using FLOW 3D
.
CRPASE: Transactions of Civil and Environmental Engineering
8
(
2
),
1
9
.
Al-Shayea
N. A.
2001
The combined effect of clay and moisture content on the behavior of remolded unsaturated soils
.
Engineering Geology
62
(
4
),
319
342
.
Ali
A. S. A.
&
Günal
M.
2021
Artificial neural network for estimation of local scour depth around bridge piers
.
Archives of Hydro-Engineering and Environmental Mechanics
68
(
2
),
87
101
.
Baker
C. J.
1980
The turbulent horseshoe vortex
.
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
6
(
1
),
9
23
.
Baykal
C.
,
Sumer
B. M.
,
Fuhrman
D. R.
,
Jacobsen
N. G.
&
Fredsoe
J.
2015
Numerical investigation of flow and scour around a vertical circular cylinder
.
Philosophical Transactions A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
373
,
2033
.
Breusers
H.
,
Nicollet
G.
&
Shen
H.
1977
Local scour around cylindrical piers
.
Journal of Hydraulic Research
15
(
3
),
211
252
.
C136-01 A
.
2001
Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
.
American Society for Testing and Materials PA
,
Pennsylvania, USA
.
Chandrasekaran
S.
2020
Design of Marine Risers with Functionally Graded Materials
.
Woodhead Publishing
,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
.
Chaudhuri
S.
&
Debnath
K.
2013
Observations on initiation of pier scour and equilibrium scour hole profiles in cohesive sediments
.
ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
19
(
1
),
27
37
.
Chiew
Y.
1984
Local Scour at Bridge Piers: Report No. 355
.
University of Auckland
,
Auckland, New Zealand
.
Chiew
Y.-M.
&
Melville
B. W.
1987
Local scour around bridge piers
.
Journal of Hydraulic Research
25
(
1
),
15
26
.
Dargahi
B.
1989
The turbulent flow field around a circular cylinder
.
Experiments in Fluids
8
(
1
),
1
12
.
Debnath
K.
&
Chaudhuri
S.
2010
Laboratory experiments on local scour around cylinder for clay and clay–sand mixed beds
.
Engineering Geology
111
(
1–4
),
51
61
.
Debnath
K.
,
Nikora
V.
&
Elliott
A.
2007
Stream bank erosion: In situ flume tests
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
133
(
3
),
256
264
.
Dey
S.
,
Bose
S. K.
&
Sastry
G. L.
1995
Clear water scour at circular piers: A model
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
121
(
12
),
869
876
.
Ettema
R.
1980
Scour at Bridge Piers
.
Ettema
R.
,
Mostafa
E. A.
,
Melville
B. W.
&
Yassin
A. A.
1998
Local scour at skewed piers
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
124
(
7
),
756
759
.
Hager
W. H.
&
Oliveto
G.
2002
Shields’ entrainment criterion in bridge hydraulics
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
128
(
5
),
538
542
.
Ibrahim
M.
,
Helmy
A.
,
Alafrawi
M.
&
El-Hazek
A.
2022
Using nanomaterial to minimize the local scour downstream of sluice gate
.
Alexandria Engineering Journal
61
(
4
),
3201
3214
.
Ismael
A.
,
Gunal
M.
&
Hussein
H.
2015
Effect of bridge pier position on scour reduction according to flow direction
.
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
40
(
6
),
1579
1590
.
Lienhard
J. H.
1966
Synopsis of Lift, Drag, and Vortex Frequency Data for Rigid Circular Cylinders
.
Technical Extension Service, Washington State University
,
Pullman, WA, USA
.
Melville
B. W.
2008
The physics of local scour at bridge piers
. In:
Proceedings 4th International Conference on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-4)
,
November 5–7, 2008
,
Tokyo, Japan
, pp.
28
40
.
Melville
B. W.
&
Coleman
S. E.
2000
Bridge Scour
.
Water Resources Publication
,
Auckland, New Zealand
.
Melville
B.
&
Sutherland
A.
1988
Design method for local scour at bridge piers
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
114
(
10
),
1210
1226
.
Mitchener
H.
&
Torfs
H.
1996
Erosion of mud/sand mixtures
.
Coastal Engineering
29
(
1–2
),
1
25
.
Moncada-M
A. T.
,
Aguirre-Pe
J.
,
Bolívar
J. C.
&
Flores
E. J.
2009
Scour protection of circular bridge piers with collars and slots
.
Journal of Hydraulic Research
47
(
1
),
119
126
.
Mueller
D. S.
1996
Local Scour at Bridge Piers in Nonuniform Sediment Under Dynamic Conditions
.
Colorado State University
,
Fort Collins, CO, USA
.
Najafzadeh
M.
&
Barani
G.-A.
2014
Experimental study of local scour around a vertical pier in cohesive soils
.
Scientia Iranica
21
(
2
),
241
250
.
Norhasri
M. M.
,
Hamidah
M.
&
Fadzil
A. M.
2017
Applications of using nano material in concrete: A review
.
Construction and Building Materials
133
,
91
97
.
Rambabu
M.
,
Rao
S. N.
&
Sundar
V.
2003
Current-induced scour around a vertical pile in cohesive soil
.
Ocean Engineering
30
(
7
),
893
920
.
Raudkivi
A. J.
&
Ettema
R.
1977
Effect of sediment gradation on clear water scour
.
Journal of the Hydraulics Division
103
(
10
),
1209
1213
.
Raudkivi
A. J.
&
Ettema
R.
1983
Clear-water scour at cylindrical piers
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
109
(
3
),
338
350
.
Raudkivi
A. J.
&
Ettema
R.
1985
Scour at cylindrical bridge piers in armored beds
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
111
(
4
),
713
731
.
Richardson
E.
&
Davis
S.
2001a
Evaluating scour at bridges: Hydraulic engineering circular No. 18. Rep. FHwA NHI, 01-001
.
Richardson
E. V.
&
Davis
S. R.
2001b
Evaluating Scour at Bridges
.
United States
:
Federal Highway Administration. Office of Bridge Technology
,
Colorado, USA
.
Roulund
A.
,
Sumer
B. M.
,
Fredsøe
J.
&
Michelsen
J.
2005
Numerical and experimental investigation of flow and scour around a circular pile
.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
534
,
351
401
.
Salim
M.
&
Jones
J. S.
1996
Scour around exposed pile foundations
. In:
North American Water and Environment Congress & Destructive Water
.
ASCE
,
Reston, VA, USA
, pp.
2202
2211
.
Schlichting
H.
&
Kestin
J.
1961
Boundary Layer Theory
.
Springer
,
New York, NY, USA
.
Sumer
B. M.
,
Hatipoglu
F.
&
Fredsøe
J.
2007
Wave scour around a pile in sand, medium dense, and dense silt
.
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
133
(
1
),
14
27
.
Van Ledden
M.
,
Van Kesteren
W.
&
Winterwerp
J.
2004
A conceptual framework for the erosion behaviour of sand–mud mixtures
.
Continental Shelf Research
24
(
1
),
1
11
.
Williams
P.
,
Balachandar
R.
&
Bolisetti
T.
2016
Effect of Densimetric Froude Number on Local Bridge Pier Scour
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).