Safe water supply and energy conservation are two goals that the water supply industry has always focused on. Integrated pump station adopts a dual-mode water supply system which has adjustable water storage capacity and can utilize the pressure of inlet water effectively; hence, it is a new type of solution in optimizing the operation of urban water supply systems. In order to solve the problem of insufficient water supply pressure during peak hours in the railway station and municipal party committee area of S city, the author constructed a pipe network hydraulic model, conducted a systematic analysis of the water supply pipe network, and optimized the design of integrated pump stations (IPSs) using NSGA-III combined with EPANET. Finally, the hydraulic model of the pipe network is used to verify the feasibility of the scheme. The results show that under the premise of ensuring a safe water supply, energy conservation, and water age optimization can be achieved simultaneously, and the fluctuation intensity of the total water supply from the water plants is effectively reduced.

  • For the first time, a new type of solution called an integrated pump station is introduced to achieve safe water supply and energy conservation.

  • The joint scheduling of water tank filling and pump frequency conversion is considered at the same time.

  • Safe water supply, energy conservation, and water age optimization can be achieved simultaneously, and the total water supply of the water plants is more balanced.

With the development of the urban economy and population, the scale of cities is constantly expanding, and the demand for urban water supply is increasing. The contradiction between supply and demand has brought new challenges to water supply enterprises. The main problems are, first, fluctuations in the pressure of the water distribution system (WDS) are sometimes significant, the water pressure at some points of WDS is insufficient during peak hours; second, high energy consumption and low efficiency of water supply equipment; third, insufficient reliability and elasticity of WDS; fourth, high leakage rate of WDS; fifth, the water age of the storage facilities can lead to the risk of poor water quality (Mala-Jetmarova et al. 2017). Optimal scheduling is an important means of WDS operation and management, which plays an important role in ensuring water supply requirements and energy conservation.

Direct pressurization in municipal water supply systems has many advantages such as energy conservation, no pollution, small area occupation, fast installation, reliable operation, and easy maintenance. However, pressurized water supply equipment is not suitable for highly concentrated consumers or areas requiring high supply reliabilities (Fengguo et al. 2017). In recent years, some cities have overused pressurized water supply equipment for local pressurization, resulting in excessive water pumping from municipal main pipes, which leads to low pressure in the pipe network during peak hours, and water supply in some areas is not guaranteed. These problems have become one of the typical problems faced by WDS in the process of urbanization. Tanks play an important role in the operation and managing the supply and demand of the network (Abunada et al. 2014). The pump station equipped with a traditional ground water storage tank (GWST) can contribute to regulating water supply quantity which improves the resilience of the water supply system; however, this method cannot effectively utilize the pressure of inlet water, resulting in higher energy consumption. Hence, a new type of pump station called an integrated pump station (IPS) is adopted in the case study, which combines the booster pump (BP) with the water storage tank pump (WSTP). The BP extracts water from the municipal pipeline network, whereas the WSTP retrieves water from a storage tank. The prominent advantage of IPS mode is that it improves the reliability and resilience of the water supply system. When the residual pressure of the WDS is sufficient, the BP can be used as the main mode of operation. During peak hours, to avoid pressure fluctuations at the front, the WSTP mode can be adopted. This research mainly discusses the optimization scheduling problem for this new type of pump station.

The decision variables in a traditional optimal scheduling problem consist of the state combinations of pumps and valves. The main objective function is the total energy consumption of water supply, and other objective functions such as total energy cost (Odan et al. 2015; Fooladivanda & Taylor 2017; Cimorelli et al. 2020), water age (Prasad & Walters 2006; Al-Jasser 2007), and water quality (Mala-Jetmarova et al. 2015; Shokoohi et al. 2017) are also considered for multi-objective optimization. The constraints of optimal scheduling are numerous and complex, including pipe network hydraulic constraints (Bagirov et al. 2013), node pressure control constraints (Makaremi et al. 2017), pump operation constraints (Zhuan & Xia 2013; Quintiliani & Creaco 2019), water level constraints (Costa et al. 2016; Oikonomou et al. 2018), etc. While the direct scheduling model is relatively simple, optimizing it in a large and complex WDS poses a significant challenge. This is attributed to the substantial number of pumps and valves, further complicated by their different categorizations.

The optimal scheduling of WDS is a typical mixed integer optimization problem (Wu et al. 2012), which contains a large number of non-convex and nonlinear constraints. Additionally, it has been demonstrated to be an NP-hard problem with extremely high computational complexity (Bagloee et al. 2018; Zamzam et al. 2018). The optimization algorithms for solving the optimization scheduling problem of WDS mainly include the exact algorithm and heuristic algorithm. The exact algorithm models the optimization scheduling problem of WDS mathematically and solves the problem using conventional deterministic mathematical models based on the problem's analytical features. The main methods include dynamic programming (DP) (Lansey & Awumah 1994), linear programming (LP) (Price & Ostfeld 2014), nonlinear programming (NLP) (Bonvin et al. 2021), mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) (Bragalli et al. 2012), mixed integer linear programming (MILP) (Liu et al. 2020; Salomons & Housh 2020), and hybrid solution (Vieira & Ramos 2008). In addition to the exact algorithm, another type of solving algorithm is the heuristic algorithm. Due to the large non-convex and nonlinear calculations involved in pipe network adjustments and constraints, obtaining analytical solutions with exact algorithms is challenging (Hooshmand et al. 2021). Therefore, heuristic algorithms are widely used to solve the optimization scheduling problem of WDS. The research on heuristic algorithms is very rich, with genetic algorithms (GA) (Mora-Melia et al. 2013; Perea et al. 2020) as the representative. The advantage of heuristic algorithms is that they do not require complex derivative calculations and initial values for decision variables. Compared with exact algorithms, these heuristic methods are more likely to obtain global optimal solutions. For small-scale pipe networks, using heuristic algorithms to solve optimal scheduling problems may have relatively high computational complexity. However, for larger-scale optimal scheduling problems, heuristic methods may be the only feasible solution method (Xu & Zhang 2023). Other commonly used heuristic algorithms include fast non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) (Artina et al. 2012; Makaremi et al. 2017), NSGA-III (Tao et al. 2022), particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Patel & Goyal 2016), ant colony optimization (ACO) (Afshar et al. 2015), and so on.

Compared to PSO and ACO, GA has better global search capabilities. However, NSGA-II can only handle low-dimensional optimization problems with a target dimension of ≤3, once the dimension increases, the non-dominated individuals in the population increase exponentially, making it difficult to distinguish between good and bad individuals based on Pareto dominance. NSGA-III is developed based on NSGA-II and uses the reference point method to select individuals (Deb & Jain 2013). NSGA-III is superior to NSGA-II in terms of algorithm robustness, solution quality, population diversity, and constraint scalability. Therefore, this research adopts the NSGA-III algorithm.

Overall, scholars have studied the optimal scheduling problem of WDS from different perspectives, some scholars such as Kurek & Ostfeld (2013) have conducted a comprehensive analysis, but it is only based on theoretical models. At present, there are limited real case studies available on the joint scheduling of water tank filling and pump frequency conversion. This research takes the WDS of S city in China as an example and utilizes NSGA-III to optimize the operation of the IPS. The results show that the IPS can play a role in energy conservation, water age optimization, and ‘peak shaving’ while ensuring regional water supply demand.

Objective function

In this research, two types of indicators are designed: energy consumption and water age. The optimal scheduling model is constructed from the perspectives of hydraulics and water quality.

Energy consumption indicator

While ensuring that the head of any node in WDS meets the minimum service head, the energy consumption of pump operation should be reduced as much as possible. The calculation method for the energy consumption of the water supply pump station is shown in the following equation.
(1)
where the above variables are defined as follows. E is the energy consumption of pump (kw·h); ρ is the specific gravity of water (ρ = 1,000 kg/m3); G is the gravitational acceleration (g = 9.81 m/s2); t denotes time t. is the water supply flow rate of pth pump at time t (m3/s); is the head of pth pump at time t (m); is the hydraulic calculation step ( = 3,600 s); is the average efficiency of the pump station during the dispatching period is uniformly set to 100% by default; M is the total number of pumps; N is the total time of delay simulation (N = 24).

Water age indicator

While ensuring service pressure and energy consumption optimization, it is also necessary to ensure that the water age of the IPS is as short as possible to meet the water quality requirements. The average water age is calculated as shown in the following equation:
(2)
where is the average water age of ith IPS (h); is the mixed water age of ith IPS at time t (h).

Multi-objective function setting

The decision variables are the pump speed ratio and the water tank inflow. The fitness of different individuals in the GA population is evaluated based on the total energy consumption of regional pump stations, and the average water age of each IPS. Additionally, penalty function constraints are added separately to eliminate unsuitable solutions.

The objective function of the energy consumption indicator is shown in the following equation.
(3)
where is the total energy consumption of ith IPS and m is the number of IPSs.
The objective function of the water age indicator of the ith IPS is shown in the following equation.
(4)
The comprehensive optimization target calculation is shown in formula (5).
(5)
where is the weight of the objective function F1; is the weight of the objective function F2(i).

Constraint conditions

Water level of water tank

  • (1) water level range
    (6)
    where is the minimum limit of water level, m; is the maximum limit of water level, m; is the number of water tanks in all IPSs.

As the outlet pipe of the water tank is positioned higher than the tank's bottom, complete drainage of the water in the tank is not possible. Therefore, in the following cases, the minimum limit of the water level is taken as 0.2 m, the maximum limit of the water level is taken as 10.2 m, and the maximum effective water depth is 10 m.

  • (2) 24-h cycle water level (penalty function)

Considering the periodic characteristics of the daily operation of the WDS, it is necessary to ensure that the water level in the water tank at 24:00 is the same as that at 0:00 at the same day. The expression is given in Equation (7), and the penalty function is given in Equation (8), which is added to F2(i).
(7)
(8)
where , are the water levels of the water tank at 0:00 and 24:00, m; is the difference between the water level at 24:00 and 0:00 in the ith tank, m.

Inlet and outlet water balance of water tank

(9)
where is the algebraic sum of the water volume of n nodes associated with the ith water tank at time t, i.e. the net water output, m3; is the cross-sectional area of the ith water tank, m2; is the water level of the ith water tank at time t, m; is the water level of the ith water tank at time t + Δt, m.

Hydraulic balance of the pipe network

The hydraulic balance of the pipe network is shown in Equation (10), which sums the flow rates of the pipe segments that flow into and out of node j. The flow rate into the node is set to a negative value, while the flow rate out of the node is set to a positive value.
(10)
where j is the total number of nodes; k is the total number of pipes; is the association set of node j; is the flow of pipe, L/s; is the flow of node j, L/s; is the head loss of pipeline, m; is the friction coefficient of the pipeline; H is the pumping head, when no pump station is set, H is taken as 0, m.

Balance of water supply and demand

(11)
where is the total water supply, ; is the total water demand, .

Pressure of critical node (penalty function)

The objective of pump boosting in a WDS is twofold. Firstly, it aims to maintain the pressure at critical nodes above a specified minimum threshold. Secondly, it seeks to prevent the pressure from exceeding this minimum threshold by a significant margin, in order to conserve energy. Therefore, the maximum and minimum pressure limits for critical nodes should satisfy the following equation:
(12)
where is the minimum pressure limit for critical nodes, m; is the maximum pressure limit for critical nodes, m; c is the index of critical nodes.
For the case where the pressure of the critical node is below the minimum pressure limit or exceeds the maximum pressure limit, a penalty function f is set as shown in the following equation, which is added to F1.
(13)
where w is the punishment coefficient, which is taken as 100 in the case study.

Pump operation mode

There are two types of pumps for IPS, BP and WSTP, both of which are variable frequency pumps. The BP uses municipal water for direct boosting, which can utilize higher residual pressure; while the WSTP boosts the water from the storage tank, which can utilize lower residual pressure. Therefore, the BP is more energy-efficient.

In order to better reduce energy consumption and reduce the number of times the pump is switched on and off, the following rules are applied in the case study: (1) the water tank only fills water during non-peak hours, while at the same time, the storage pump is switched off; (2) the WSTP only works during peak hours, when the water tank stops filling water; (3) the BP can be switched on at any time during the period of 24 h; (4) in theory, the speed ratio (r/r0) of variable speed pumps is in the range of [0,1], where 0 represents 0 Hz and 1 represents the full frequency of 50 Hz. However, the operation of variable frequency pumps at low frequencies can cause many hazards, such as severe motor heating, pump cavitation, vibration, and noise. Therefore, the specific speed ratio in the case is set to optimize in the range of [0.5,1], as shown in the following equation.
(14)
where r is the actual speed, r/min; r0 is the rated speed, r/min.

Introduction to NSGA-III algorithm

This research uses the NSGA-Ⅲ to optimize decision variables, and the flowchart of the algorithm is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Flowchart of NSGA-Ⅲ algorithm.

Figure 1

Flowchart of NSGA-Ⅲ algorithm.

Close modal

Overview of the water distribution network

S City belongs to a hilly area with a water supply area of 62 km2, a pipeline length of 490 km (100 mm diameter or above), a water supply population of 800,000, a total water supply capacity of 380,000 m3/day, and an actual (average) water supply of 251,000 m3 /day. The topology of WDS is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

The topology of WDS.

Figure 2

The topology of WDS.

Close modal
Figure 3 shows the 24-h variation of water supply. From Figure 3(a)–(c), we can see the fluctuation of water supply for the three water plants, and Figure 3(d) shows the total water supply which reflects the daily fluctuation of water demand for users. The characteristics of water demand during the morning and evening peak hours are significant, with a valley value of approximately 5,000–7,000 m3/h, a peak value of 13,000–15,000 m3 /h, an average value of 10,000–11,000 m3/h, and a maximum hourly peak coefficient of 1.4.
Figure 3

24-h box line diagram of water supply. (a) Water supply of water plant A. (b) Water supply of water plant B. (c) Water supply of water plant C. (d) Total water supply.

Figure 3

24-h box line diagram of water supply. (a) Water supply of water plant A. (b) Water supply of water plant B. (c) Water supply of water plant C. (d) Total water supply.

Close modal

The railway station (RS) and the municipal party committee (MPC) are two areas with high water demand, as shown in Figure 2. Among them, the daily water demand of the RS area is 14,333 m3 (about 5.7% of the total daily water supply), and the daily water demand of the MPC area is 7,667 m3 (about 3.1% of the total daily water supply). Due to the incomplete construction of urban pipe networks and pump stations, water pressure often falls short during peak hours (8:00–10:00, 21:00–23:00) in the two specific areas. As a result, the water supply company frequently receives complaints from residents experiencing water outages. Furthermore, the ground elevation fluctuation within the two regions is relatively large, and some users at high altitudes and high building floors have always suffered from water shortages.

Improving the problem of insufficient pressure in local areas can generally be achieved in two ways. First, using a unified pressurized water supply model (i.e. By increasing the pressure of water from water plants) to solve the problem, but this approach can lead to excess pressure in most of the pipe network, high energy consumption, and high leakage loss. Second, adding local regulation and pressurization facilities, such as GWST pump station, BP station, and the IPS recommended in the case study. Comparatively speaking, the construction of an IPS to solve the problem of insufficient regional pressure and water supply security is theoretically a better choice and is also the focus of this research.

Model construction and analysis

The hydraulic model constructed in this project covers all pipelines with a diameter of 100 mm or greater. The model data were selected on 7 June 2021, and the hydraulic model simulation time step was 1 h, with a total duration of 24 time periods. After establishing the model, a verification assessment of model accuracy was conducted, and the model simulation results were consistent with the actual situation of the WDS. All pressure errors were within 1.0 m, and flow errors were within 10%. Therefore, the model meets the analysis requirements.

Using this model to analyze the current situation, the RS and MPC areas do experience insufficient pressure during peak hours. The minimum pressure of critical node in the RS area is around 8 m (an 8-story building actually requires a water head of 36 m), while the minimum pressure of critical node in the MPC area is around 12 m (a 9-story building actually requires a water head of 40 m). Therefore, water supply cannot be guaranteed.

Structural function design of IPSs

According to the site survey, a reasonable location for the pump station was selected, and the local pipeline network was modified to separate the transmission and distribution pipelines in the RS and MPC areas. Due to the limited available space and the unsuitability for excavation in the two areas, it is difficult to use conventional GWST. In this case, the IPS with a cylindrical water tank with a height of 11 m is adopted. The main functions are as follows:

  • (1) Adopting a dual mode water supply system of ‘BP + WSTP’, the BP fully utilizes the residual water pressure at the inlet of the pump, and the WSTP can also utilize the pressure of higher water level in the cylindrical water tank, achieving significant energy-saving effects.

  • (2) By adopting intelligent water inlet and outlet control in the water tank, the optimal water age of the IPS can be achieved, which is conducive to ensuring downstream water quality and hygiene.

  • (3) The water storage tank of the pump station can have a peak-shaving and valley-filling effect, which improves the ability to guarantee downstream water supply during peak periods, and significantly reduces the pressure fluctuation of the upstream pipeline network. Therefore, it is beneficial for the balanced operation of water plant pump stations.

The structure diagram and model topology of the IPS are shown in Figure 4. The IPS is simulated in the way of ‘water tank + pump’ in the constructed pipe network model. In the model, two storage tanks are equivalently transformed into one water tank (equal height, twice the cross-sectional area), which has no effect on water age. The inlet valve adopts a flow control valve (FCV) that can control the flow rate.
Figure 4

Structural diagram and model topology diagram of the IPS.

Figure 4

Structural diagram and model topology diagram of the IPS.

Close modal

The pump station's flow is designed based on the regional water demand, while the head of the pump station is designed according to the head demand at the critical node. The volume of the water tank is determined based on the water demand during the corresponding peak demand periods for a duration of 2 h. The selection of parameters for the IPS at the RS and MPC are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Selection of parameters for IPSs

Water supply areaWater tank
Pump
NumberDiameter (m)Height (m)Volume (m3)Q (m3/h)H (m)NumberCategory
RS – 836 27 BP 
10 11 1,700 836 45 WSTP 
MPC – 448 24 BP 
11 1,000 448 44 WSTP 
Water supply areaWater tank
Pump
NumberDiameter (m)Height (m)Volume (m3)Q (m3/h)H (m)NumberCategory
RS – 836 27 BP 
10 11 1,700 836 45 WSTP 
MPC – 448 24 BP 
11 1,000 448 44 WSTP 

Operating mode design of IPS

The operation mode of the pumps in the IPS includes three types: a. the BP works alone; b. the WSTP works alone; c. the BP and the WSTP work together. In order to minimize the energy consumption during operation and reduce the water age of the IPS, this scheme adopts plan c during peak hours and plan a during non-peak hours. There are two water tank filling modes: d. water filling throughout the whole period; e. water filling only during part of the period. In order to reduce the control complexity of the FCV, plan e is adopted for water tank filling. Water is stored during non-peak hours and supplied during peak hours, with two refilling and discharging cycles per day.

In this case study, the design of the IPS operation mode is outlined in Table 2.

Table 2
 
 

Decision variables optimization based on NSGA-III algorithm

Optimization model setting

Using the NSGA-III algorithm to optimize the operating frequency of the pump (BP and WSTP) and the inlet flow rate of the water tank, while ensuring pressure at critical node meets both maximum and minimum limit requirements, the goal of simultaneously optimizing the operating energy consumption and the water age of each IPS is achieved. With a simulation time step of 1 h, an optimized operating plan is generated for the operating frequency of the pump and the inlet flow rate of the water tank within a day.

Genetic algorithm parameter settings

For the optimization model mentioned above, the relevant parameters are as follows:

  • Population: 100

  • Iteration times: 500

  • Probability of mutation: 0.01

  • The parameter F in differential evolution: 0.4

  • Recombination probability: 0.8

  • Normalized weight: w0 = 0.001, w1 = 0.1, w2 = 0.1

Through 500 iterations, the Pareto front plot for the three objectives is shown in Figure 5. The results marked with circles in the figure are the optimal solutions based on normalized weights. The results are as follows:
Figure 5

Pareto front plot of F1, F2(1), F2(2) (Generations = 500).

Figure 5

Pareto front plot of F1, F2(1), F2(2) (Generations = 500).

Close modal

F1 consists of two parts, where the actual energy consumption value is 1,848 and the penalty function value is 73. The penalty function value is caused by the pressure of the critical node slightly exceeding the minimum/maximum limit of set pressure.

Optimization results of decision variables: the optimization results of pump speed ratio and water tank inflow are shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6

Optimization results of pump speed ratio and water tank inflow.

Figure 6

Optimization results of pump speed ratio and water tank inflow.

Close modal

Energy consumption analysis

The energy consumption comparison data for different operating modes are shown in Table 3. Compared with the local pressurization mode, the energy consumption of the unified pressurization water supply mode in water plants is too high, which is obviously an unfeasible mode. In the local pressurization modes, the mode of setting a GWST with pump pressurization has the highest , which is the sum of energy consumption of all IPSs; if the energy consumption of water plants is considered, it also has the highest , which is defined as the following equation.
(15)
where is the energy consumption of water plant i.
Table 3

Energy consumption comparison of different operating modes

Energy consumption (kW·h)
Water plant AWater plant BWater plant CIPSsTotal
Unified pressurized water supply mode 4,184,986 1,648,833 61,220 – 5,895,039 
GWST mode 1,974,942 537,543 450,632 2,670 2,965,787 
Booster mode 1,972,242 540,267 450,319 1,648 2,964,476 
IPS mode 1,968,520 532,403 450,683 1,848 2,953,454 
Energy consumption (kW·h)
Water plant AWater plant BWater plant CIPSsTotal
Unified pressurized water supply mode 4,184,986 1,648,833 61,220 – 5,895,039 
GWST mode 1,974,942 537,543 450,632 2,670 2,965,787 
Booster mode 1,972,242 540,267 450,319 1,648 2,964,476 
IPS mode 1,968,520 532,403 450,683 1,848 2,953,454 

Note: Each mode has a corresponding model. In the following three local boosting modes, we used algorithms combined with EPANET for optimization. In this case, due to the fact that the pressure in the RS and MPC areas is mainly related to the pressure of water plant A&B, the unified water supply mode increases the water supply pressure of water plant A&B, resulting in a corresponding reduction in the water supply and energy consumption of water plant C. In the local pressurization mode, the water pressure of the three water plants is relatively balanced, and the water outflow and energy consumption are also relatively balanced.

Although the booster mode has the lowest , the of the booster mode even slightly exceeds that of the IPS mode. In addition, in the IPS mode, compared with conventional GWST, the head of the pump can be significantly reduced due to the higher available head of the cylindrical water tank. Based on experience, it is estimated that using a high cylindrical water tank can save about 10–20% energy compared to using a GWST. Overall, the comprehensive energy consumption of IPS mode is optimal.

Water age analysis

By optimizing the inflow and outflow of the water tank, the water level variation of the two areas is shown in Figure 7(a). The water age variation of the water tank and the node with maximum water age (MWAN) in two areas are shown in Figure 7(b).
Figure 7

(a) Water level variation. (b) Water age of water tank and the MWAN.

Figure 7

(a) Water level variation. (b) Water age of water tank and the MWAN.

Close modal

The results show that the average water age of the MWAN in the two areas is 7.87/7.79 h, respectively, and the maximum water age is 14.08/13.52 h, respectively, both of which meet the requirements of water age that should be less than 48 h according to the regulations of the local water supply management department.

Balance analysis of total water output of water plants

The comparison of total water supply from the water plants before and after the construction of the IPSs is illustrated in Figure 8, indicating that the IPS has played a certain role in peak-shaving and valley-filling.
Figure 8

Comparison of total water supply from water plants before and after the construction of IPSs.

Figure 8

Comparison of total water supply from water plants before and after the construction of IPSs.

Close modal
The fluctuation intensity of the total water supply from the water plants is used as a metric for the efficiency of the water tank of the IPS to achieve ‘peak-shaving and valley-filling’. is calculated using the sample standard deviation formula, as shown in Equation (16). Before the construction of the IPS, was 2,203 m3 /h, and after the construction, was 1,904 m3 /h. It can be seen that after the construction of the IPSs, the total water supply of the water plants is more balanced. If more regulation and storage facilities are used in the future, the total water supply curve of the water plant will gradually approach the average line.
(16)
where is the fluctuation intensity of the total water supply from the water plants, m3/h; is the total outflow of the water plants at time t, m3/h; is the average of total outflow within 24 h, m3/h.

Pressure analysis of the critical nodes

Through the construction of two regional IPSs, model simulation analysis shows that the pressure at the critical node of the RS/MPC reaches 36/40 m, respectively, meeting the water supply pressure requirements for the critical node in each area. By setting the pressure penalty function for the critical node, it is guaranteed that the pressure will not be overly redundant. In practical engineering, the pressure at the critical node can be maintained within a reasonable range through the application of end-constant pressure control technology.

This research proposes an IPS solution to solve the problem of insufficient pressure during peak hours in two local areas. The NSGA-Ⅲ multi-objective optimization algorithm is used to optimize the decision variables, and the optimal solution is verified by a hydraulic simulation using EPANET. The results demonstrate that energy conservation and water age optimization can be accomplished while ensuring a safe water supply, effectively reducing the fluctuation intensity of the total water supply from the water plants. The relevant conclusions of this design case are as follows:

  • 1. The unified pressurized water supply mode has high energy consumption and is not economical, which can cause pressure redundancy in most WDS and increase the amount of water leakage. The mode of local pressurization is more economical and reasonable, which can make the spatiotemporal pressure of WDS more balanced. Among various modes of local pressurization, the IPS mode is optimal, which strikes a good balance between safe water supply and low energy costs.

  • 2. By optimizing the operation mode of the water tank in the IPS, the average water age of the MWAN in the two areas is 7.87/7.79 h, respectively, and the maximum water age is 14.08/13.52 h, respectively, both of which meet the requirements of water quality.

  • 3. The construction of IPSs can enhance the resilience of the WDS and reduce the fluctuation intensity of the total water supply from the water plants, which is 2,203 and 1,904 m3 /h, respectively, before and after the construction of IPSs. It can be seen that the water plant's total supply is more balanced after the construction of IPSs.

  • 4. The IPS designed in this case has the advantages of small footprint, good energy saving, adjustable storage, and controllable water age. Under the policy guidance of ‘energy conservation and dual carbon’ and ‘urban resilience’, it is likely to gain more market favor in the future, especially in densely populated cities with undulating terrain. NSGA-Ⅲ algorithm has the advantages of robustness, population diversity, and constraint scalability, and has good results for such multi-objective optimization problems.

We thank the water company for providing the basic information. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their comments and suggestions.

R. L. collected the data, rendered support in modeling and programming design, developed the methodology, visualized the data, and wrote the initial draft; H. W. rendered support in programming design and visualization; K. X. rendered support in funding acquisition, supervised the work, and wrote revisions; T. T. wrote revisions.

This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers: 52270093].

All authors give their consent to participate.

All authors give their consent to publish.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Afshar
A.
,
Masoumi
F.
&
Sam Sandoval Solis
S. S.
2015
Reliability based optimum reservoir design by hybrid ACO-LP algorithm
.
Water Resources Management
29
(
6
),
2045
2058
.
Artina
S.
,
Bragalli
C.
,
Erbacci
G.
,
Marchi
A.
&
Rivi
M.
2012
Contribution of parallel NSGA-II in optimal design of water distribution networks
.
Journal of Hydroinformatics
14
(
2
),
310
323
.
Bagirov
A. M.
,
Barton
A. F.
,
Mala-Jetmarova
H.
,
Al Nuaimat
A.
,
Ahmed
S. T.
,
Sultanova
N.
&
Yearwood
J.
2013
An algorithm for minimization of pumping costs in water distribution systems using a novel approach to pump scheduling
.
Mathematical and Computer Modelling
57
(
3–4
),
873
886
.
Bagloee
S. A.
,
Asadi
M.
& Patriksson, M.
2018
Minimization of water pumps’ electricity usage: A hybrid approach of regression models with optimization
.
Expert Systems with Applications
107
,
222
242
.
Bonvin
G.
,
Demassey
S.
&
Lodi
A.
2021
Pump scheduling in drinking water distribution networks with an LP/NLP-based branch and bound
.
Optimization and Engineering
22
,
1275
1313
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09575-y
.
Bragalli
C.
,
Ambrosio
C. D.
,
Lee
J.
,
Lodi
A.
&
Toth
P.
2012
On the optimal design of water distribution networks: A practical MINLP approach
.
Optimization and Engineering
13
,
219
246
.
Cimorelli
L.
,
Aniello
A. D.
& Cozzolin, L.
2020
Boosting genetic algorithm performance in pump scheduling problems with a novel decision-variable representation
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
146
(
5
),
04020023
.
Costa
L. H. M.
,
Prata
B. A.
,
Ramos
H. M.
&
Castro
M. A. H.
2016
A branch-and-bound algorithm for optimal pump scheduling in water distribution networks
.
Water Resources Management
30
(
3
),
1037
1052
.
Fengguo, C., Peng, S. & Shidong, Y.
2017
Pressurized water supply system of energy saving optimization and technical innovation
.
Applied Mechanics and Materials
858
,
294
299
.
Fooladivanda
D.
&
Taylor
J. A.
2017
Energy-optimal pump scheduling and water flow
.
IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
5
(
3
),
1016
1026
.
Hooshmand
F.
,
Jamalian
M.
& MirHassani, S. A.
2021
Efficient two-phase algorithm to solve nonconvex MINLP model of pump scheduling problem
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
147
(
8
),
04021047
.
Lansey
K. E.
&
Awumah
K.
1994
Optimal pump operations considering pump switches
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
120
(
1
),
17
35
.
Liu
Y.
,
Barrows
C.
,
Macknick
J.
&
Mauter
M.
2020
Optimization framework to assess the demand response capacity of a water distribution system
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
146
(
8
),
04020063
.
Mala-Jetmarova
H.
,
Barton
A.
& Bagirov, A.
2015
Exploration of the trade-offs between water quality and pumping costs in optimal operation of regional multiquality water distribution systems
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
141
(
6
),
04014077
.
Mala-Jetmarova
H.
,
Sultanova
N.
& Savic, D.
2017
Lost in optimisation of water distribution systems? A literature review of system operation
.
Environmental Modelling & Software
93
,
209
254
.
Mora-Melia
D.
,
Iglesias-Rey
P. L.
,
Martinez-Solano
F. J.
&
Fuertes-Miquel
V. S.
2013
Design of water distribution networks using a pseudo-genetic algorithm and sensitivity of genetic operators
.
Water Resources Management
27
(
12
),
4149
4162
.
Odan, F. K., Reis, L. F. R. & M.ASCE, Z. K.
2015
Real-time multiobjective optimization of operation of water supply systems
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
141
(
9
),
04015011
.
Oikonomou
K.
,
Parvania
M.
& Khatami, R.
2018
Optimal demand response scheduling for water distribution systems
.
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
14
(
11
),
5112
5122
.
Patel
H. M.
&
Goyal
R. V.
2016
Optimal design of a booster chlorination system for a drinking water distribution network using EPANET and PSO
. In
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2016
.
Perea, R. G., Moreno, M. A., Baptista, V. B. S. & Córcoles, J. I.
2020
Decision support system based on genetic algorithms to optimize the daily management of water abstraction from multiple groundwater supply sources
.
Water Resources Management
34
(
15
),
4739
4755
.
Salomons
E.
&
Housh
M.
2020
A practical optimization scheme for real-time operation of water distribution systems
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
146
(
4
),
04020016
.
Shokoohi
M.
,
Tabesh
M.
,
Nazif
S.
&
Dini
M.
2017
Water quality based multi-objective optimal design of water distribution systems
.
Water Resources Management
31
,
93
108
.
Wu
W.
,
Simpson
A. R.
,
Maier
H. R.
&
Marchi
A.
2012
Incorporation of variable-speed pumping in multiobjective genetic algorithm optimization of the design of water transmission systems
.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
138
(
5
),
543
552
.
Xu, N. & Zhang, B. 2023 Advanced Modeling and Algorithm for Pipeline Scheduling. In: Advanced Intelligent Pipeline Management Technology (Su, H., Liao, Q., Zhang, H. & Zio, E. eds.). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9899-7_2.
Zamzam
A. S.
,
Dall Anese
E.
,
Zhao
C.
,
Taylor
J. A.
&
Sidiropoulos
N. D.
2018
Optimal water–power flow-problem: Formulation and distributed optimal solution
.
IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
6
(
1
),
37
47
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).