This study analyses rainfall pattern and land use land cover (LULC) changes and their impact on the water level of the Hatia dam, a crucial water source for Ranchi city in Jharkhand, India. High-resolution daily-gridded rainfall and temperature data from 1991 to 2023 were collected from IMD Pune and analyzed using Mann–Kendall and Sen's slope estimator. The results showed a significant decline in annual, monsoon, post-monsoon, and winter rainfall, while pre-monsoon rainfall increased. LULC changes were assessed using Google Earth Engine at 5-year intervals, revealing notable shifts in waterbodies, built-up areas, forests, barren land, and agriculture before and after the monsoon. The analysis shows that during the pre-monsoon season, the waterbody decreased from 8.68 to 4.94%, while the built-up area increased from 2.71 to 11.08%. Similar trends were observed during the post-monsoon season, with the waterbody decreasing from 10.06 to 7.3% and the built-up area increasing from 2.74 to 11.27%. It is observed from the rainfall analysis that the annual rainfall is decreasing from 1,561 to 703 mm and the reservoir surface area has decreased from 126.31 to 37.44 ha. The findings highlight the need for sustainable water management strategies.

  • Studied the impacts of LULC changes in the reservoir water level of the Hatia dam.

  • Studied significant reduction in the reservoir water level due to construction of elevated roads.

Rainfall is a crucial factor that shapes vegetation, water quality, and hydrology of a region. Crop selection in agriculture is largely determined by temperature and precipitation patterns, which can vary greatly across regions. Understanding rainfall features, such as its amount, distribution, and seasonal variations, is essential for increasing agricultural productivity and adapting to changing climatic conditions (Gajbhiye et al. 2016; Meshram et al. 2017). India's economy, food security, energy security, and agriculture are all directly or indirectly dependent on timely access to a sufficient quantity of rainfall (Jain & Kumar 2012). The rainfall dynamics are crucial in understanding regional hydrological systems. It is equally important to consider the role of anthropogenic factors, such as changes in land use and land cover (LULC) that also significantly impact water resources.

To analyse changes in LULC in river basins, especially those in arid and semi-arid regions, large geospatial datasets may be processed using cloud computing platforms like Google Earth Engine (GEE). This allows for the making of well-informed decisions on sustainable water management (Souza et al. 2020; Niu et al. 2022). Changes in LULC have a direct influence on climate change, hydrological processes, and other environmental issues (Iban & Sachin 2022; Rautela et al. 2023). Several factors including population increase, socioeconomic development, deforestation, urbanization, agriculture, and decreasing water quality, have contributed to human-caused changes in LULC (Sertel et al. 2010; Napoli et al. 2017). Urbanization, agriculture, and soil nutrient fluxes affect the growth of native species and the composition of soil textures. Changes in land cover may also influence the way reservoir function. Changes in land cover is the main factor affecting surface runoff, and these changes also affect the groundwater recharge, evapotranspiration, infiltration, and other hydrological parameters (Ranjan & Singh 2022). It is important to investigate the spatial distribution, size, extent, and position of land cover changes to ascertain the extent to which these changes may impact hydrological processes locally, regionally, and globally (Sertel et al. 2010; Lee & Berbery 2012). As land cover changes and hydrological consequences are closely related, it is critical to evaluate the potential effects of fast urbanization, deforestation, and agricultural practices, especially in surrounding areas of sensitive ecosystems, on water availability and ecosystem health.

Sustainable urban development strategies are necessary because urbanization causes changes in LULC patterns, which may have negative ecological effects (Long et al. 2008). In the present context, LULC changes affect hydrological systems and are crucial for sustainable development, optimal use, and management of water resources (Ayivi & Jha 2018; Sam & Khoi 2022). Debnath et al. (2022) observed the impact of temperature-rainfall and LULC changes on the hydrological regime of a forested watershed in Northeast India from 1986 to 2016. Results showed significant decreases in water discharge, level, and hydraulic variables, with LULC changes being more responsible than rainfall variations (Shree & Kumar 2018). Using Mann–Kendall (MK) and Sen's slope approaches, the study examined trends in seasonal and annual rainfall in Ranchi district of Jharkhand from 1901 to 2014. The susceptibility of region to droughts and floods was shown by the results, which indicated large drops in annual, winter, and southwest monsoon rainfall and increases in pre- and post-monsoon rainfall. The Hatia dam, located on the river Subarnarekha in the upstream of Ranchi, (Jharkhand), India, is the main source of water supply for the Ranchi city, located in Jharkhand state of India. After formation of Jharkhand state and declaration of Ranchi city as its capital, there is rapid increase in urbanization and population growth. Only 2.25% of Jharkhand's total land area is urbanized with a population of 2,350,612 in Ranchi district, according to the Census of India (2001). As per the Census of India (2011), the population of Ranchi has increased to 19%. This surge in population expansion and thereby urban development has led to significant shifts in land-use patterns, particularly in regions that were previously dominated by tribal populations. These changes have not only altered the landscape but also exacerbated water management challenges.

Land-use patterns in tribal-dominated regions have changed due to rapid urbanization and population expansion, especially around the outer edges of major towns. The creation of advanced industry, especially in the vicinity of the state capital, has led to an increase in urbanization in Jharkhand (Kumar et al. 2011). People have been forced to relocate because of their land being taken for industrial purposes, making it difficult to provide for and rehabilitate them (Priyadarshi & Dutt 2000). The rapid increase in urbanization and population growth in the region has led to an increased demand for water, imposing pressure on existing water sources. The construction of the Ranchi ring road has affected the drainage and runoff capacity of the basin, with infrastructure development encroaching on the drainage and entry of water into the reservoir. Rapid urbanization in Ranchi over the last few decades has altered the landscape, disturbed water retention capacity, and depleted groundwater, leading to a water crisis and contamination.

The process of urbanization has significant implications for changes in demographic characteristics and the physical transformation of landscapes. However, when urbanization occurs in an unplanned, unsystematic, and rapid manner, it can lead to profound impacts on various environmental components, particularly on land and water resources (Patra et al. 2012). Urbanization also leads to a reduction in infiltration, which in turn affects the recharge of aquifers and alters streamflow regimes. This can result in an increase in surface runoff (Saddique et al. 2020). By changing the quantity and timing of precipitation, the way water penetrates and percolates through soils, and the way water is released into streams and rivers, changes in land use can have a direct effect on the hydrological cycle. Additionally, utilization of land changes in vegetation cover, soil qualities, and land management techniques are examples of how physical, chemical, and biological aspects of the landscape can change and have an indirect impact on the hydrologic response (Gabiri et al. 2020). Further affecting water resources and ecosystem health, these changes may have an impact on the way water travels through the environment and the mechanisms that control it (Zhang et al. 2017). Land-use change can have profound and multifaceted impacts on the hydrological cycle, with consequences for water resources and the broader environment. Hence, the main objectives are (i) to study the trends of historical data of rainfall and temperature in the catchment of the Hatia dam and its impacts on the water spread area of the reservoir and (ii) to study the LULC changes and its impact on the reservoir surface area in the dam. The findings of the study can be used for conservation efforts and water resource management decisions by accounting for the hydrological impacts of LULC changes in the catchment of the Hatia dam.

The Hatia dam is in the Subarnarekha river basin, located southwest of the capital city of Ranchi in Jharkhand, India. It lies between latitude (23°17′ to 23°20′) and longitude (85°9′ to 85°17′30″). The Hatia water supply system provides water to the heavy engineering corporate industrial area and residents living in the southern part of Ranchi City. The dam has a catchment area of 50.05 km2. The average annual rainfall of this region ranges from 1,160 to 1,211 mm. The major soil type found in the catchment is sandy alluvial soil. Usually, sandy alluvial soil has high permeability, which makes it easy for water to seep and penetrate the soil. In addition to maintaining streamflow in the catchment region, this can improve groundwater recharge as well. Figure 1 depicts the map showing the Subarnarekha river, the Hatia dam and its catchment area and other important infrastructural components of the Hatia dam catchment within the research region.
Figure 1

Map showing the location of the study area.

Figure 1

Map showing the location of the study area.

Close modal

The meteorological characteristics are essential datasets for hydrological process modelling. These characteristics were received in gridded form from the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) Pune from 1991 to 2023. The datasets include rainfall, maximum temperature (Tmax), and minimum temperature (Tmin). Table 1 presents the data used and its sources. The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with a resolution of 30 m was utilized for the preparation of stream network. This resolution is appropriate for precisely capturing important topographical features such as elevation variations, drainage patterns, and watershed boundaries, which are essential for hydrological modelling and LULC analysis. ASTER DEM data are freely available and offers global coverage, making it accessible for consistent use across different regions, including the study area in Ranchi, India. Also, it is compatible with major GIS platforms, such as ArcGIS and GEE, which were used for LULC and hydrological analyses in this study. The 30 m resolution is sufficient for watershed delineation, stream network analysis, and slope calculations, which are critical components of hydrological studies. In the present study, GEE was utilized to generate the LULC data for the basin by using images from Landsat 5 and Landsat 8.

Table 1

Sources and their input data

SourcesInput data
DEM (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov)
Data name – SRTM 1 Arc-Second Global
Resolution – 30 m × 30m 
Land use and land cover (LULC) (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov)
LANDSAT-5(1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008),
LANDSAT-8(2013,2018 and 2022),
Level-2 GeoTiff Data Product.
Resolution – 30 m
(https://code.earthengine.google.com/
Gridded rainfall data IMD Pune
(0.25° × 0.25°), Unit – millimeter (mm)
https://imdpune.gov.in/cmpg/Griddata/Rainfall_25_NetCDF.html 
Maximum and minimum temperature data IMD Pune
(1° × 1°), Unit – Celsius (°C)
https://imdpune.gov.in/cmpg/Griddata/Min_1_Bin.html
https://imdpune.gov.in/cmpg/Griddata/Max_1_Bin.html 
SourcesInput data
DEM (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov)
Data name – SRTM 1 Arc-Second Global
Resolution – 30 m × 30m 
Land use and land cover (LULC) (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov)
LANDSAT-5(1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008),
LANDSAT-8(2013,2018 and 2022),
Level-2 GeoTiff Data Product.
Resolution – 30 m
(https://code.earthengine.google.com/
Gridded rainfall data IMD Pune
(0.25° × 0.25°), Unit – millimeter (mm)
https://imdpune.gov.in/cmpg/Griddata/Rainfall_25_NetCDF.html 
Maximum and minimum temperature data IMD Pune
(1° × 1°), Unit – Celsius (°C)
https://imdpune.gov.in/cmpg/Griddata/Min_1_Bin.html
https://imdpune.gov.in/cmpg/Griddata/Max_1_Bin.html 

Delineation of watershed

The delineation of watersheds in ArcGIS entails defining the limits of drainage regions. Stream network development, flow direction analysis, and watershed delineation are common processes in this procedure. To delineate watersheds in ArcGIS, open a new map, add the DEM, and set workspaces. Fill sinks, determine flow direction, and calculate contributing cells. Identify locations of interest, use the Watershed tool, and convert the raster to a vector format using Raster to Polygon for further analysis and modelling. The flowchart for watershed delineation involves the following steps, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Flowchart of watershed delineation.

Figure 2

Flowchart of watershed delineation.

Close modal

Time series analysis and statistical distribution of temperature and rainfall

The time series analysis of gridded temperature and rainfall data throughout several seasons, such as annual, pre-monsoon, post-monsoon, winter, and monsoon, provides a thorough spatial description of the distribution and variability of precipitation in the research region. These graphical depictions help to provide a comprehensive knowledge of seasonal precipitation dynamics and their effects on hydrological systems by observing the various patterns, trends, and intensities of rainfall throughout various time periods. These graphs are vital for examining the interactions between seasonal precipitation variation and their impact on hydrological systems because they provide a visual representation of the geographical subtleties of rainfall throughout different seasons.

Thiessen polygon method

The area-averaged gauge rainfall was interpolated using the Thiessen polygon technique. This method involves creating polygons around each rain gauge, with the area of each polygon representing the region of influence for that gauge. In the study area, only one of the four gridded points was found to be usable and available very close to the study area. Inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolation technique was used for interpolation of rainfall data in the present study.

Trend analysis using the MK test

Trend analysis of rainfall is a method used to detect changes in temperature and rainfall patterns over time. It involves analysis of long-term temperature and rainfall data to identify patterns, trends, and changes in rainfall amounts, frequency, and distribution. This analysis helps to forecast future rainfall patterns and understand the impacts of climate change on hydrological systems.

This is widely used in non-parametric method for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological and meteorological time series data (Mann 1945; Kendall 1975; Patra et al. 2012; Himayoun & Roshni 2019; Sa'adi et al. 2019; Deoli & Kumar 2020) analyzing time series data that deviates from a normal distribution, like hydrological data, is appropriate for the MK test.

The MK test in a time series P1, P2, P3, …. Pn of length n is given by
(1)
(2)

The hypothesis that the MK test would examine was that there is no trend in the time series (H0), and that there is a monotonic trend (H1) that can be either upward or downward.

When the trend is rising, the S statistic usually shows a positive number; when it is falling, it shows a negative value. The MK statistic's variance is displayed as follows.
(3)
where tm is the total number of data values in the mth group and q is the number of tied groups.
After computing the variance of time series data, the Z value is determined using the formula below.
(4)
A positive value of the MK test statistic (Zmk) suggests an increasing trend in the data, while a negative value indicates a decreasing trend. The primary advantage of the MK test is that it can tolerate missing values or outliers, which are usual in environmental datasets like rainfall and temperature records and is robust to non-normal data distributions. Despite being strong, it may not function well if the dataset contains autocorrelations. The correlation between a signal and its delayed replica as a function of lag is known as autocorrelation. A serial correlation test was conducted prior to the MK test since the presence of autocorrelation in time series data is likely to impact the test's results was calculated using a two-tailed test at a 5% significance level (Ahmad et al. 2015; Patakumuri et al. 2020). The flow chart of methodology for trend analysis is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Flowchart of Mann–Kendall test and Sen's slope test.

Figure 3

Flowchart of Mann–Kendall test and Sen's slope test.

Close modal

Sen's slope estimator

Sen's slope estimator test is used to get a non-parametric trend slope, which indicates how considerable a trend is. The overall trend slope is determined by first calculating the slope for each pair of points throughout time, and then taking the median of all the slopes (Sen 1968). If the calculated value of β is positive, it represents an ‘upward trend’ while a negative value depicted ‘downward trend’ (Xu et al. 2007; Karpouzos et al. 2010). Sen's slope has an advantage over parametric approaches in that it is not affected by extreme values or outliers, which might affect the results. Because of this, it is the best option for evaluating environmental data that could see abrupt changes because of severe weather or natural variability.

The first step in the Sen's slope estimator method is to use the following formula to get the slope (Si) of each data pair (Figure 3).
(5)
where yj and yk are values at j and k for j>k, respectively
Sen's slope may be calculated by taking these N values' median and using the following formula
(6)

Sen's slope estimator and the MK tests were selected for this study as they are appropriate for assessing skewed and non-normally distributed environmental data, such as rainfall and temperature records.

Land Use Land Cover

The term LULC describes how natural components and human activity are categorized on a landscape during a certain period. The LULC maps are essential for tracking changes in land-use patterns over time, which supports environmental management and conservation efforts. Developing infrastructure, planning urban expansion, and ensuring sustainable urban growth all depend on LULC maps. Using scientific and statistical methods, GEE is used to create LULC classifications, which facilitate the study and mapping of different land cover types within a given region during a certain period. The description of all the classes of LULC is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

LULC classes and their description

Class nameDescription
Waterbody Ponds, canal, rivers, reservoir 
Built-up Residential, commercial, industrial, roads, and transportation 
Forest Deciduous forest areas, evergreen forest, mixed forest, residential forest 
Barren sandy areas, open fields without vegetation, exposed rock, gravel pits, and mixed barren land 
Agriculture Cropland, shrubland, grassland 
Class nameDescription
Waterbody Ponds, canal, rivers, reservoir 
Built-up Residential, commercial, industrial, roads, and transportation 
Forest Deciduous forest areas, evergreen forest, mixed forest, residential forest 
Barren sandy areas, open fields without vegetation, exposed rock, gravel pits, and mixed barren land 
Agriculture Cropland, shrubland, grassland 

Google Earth Engine

A platform called GEE uses data from Earth observation to map patterns, quantify variances, and pinpoint changes on the planet's surface (Kumar & Mutanga 2018). To be more precise, they used data from the Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 sensors to produce these LULC maps for the various seasons. The LULC maps for the years 1993, 1998, 2003, and 2008 were created using Landsat 5 images. The Landsat 8 imagery was used to produce LULC maps for the years 2013, 2018, and 2023. Pre-monsoon and post-monsoon were taken into consideration as two separate seasons. November was selected as the post-monsoon season, while April was designated as the pre-monsoon period. After the LULC maps are generated using GEE, the next step is to input these maps into ArcGIS. The detail process of preparing LULC maps is shown in the flow charts in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Flowchart of LULC preparation from the GEE.

Figure 4

Flowchart of LULC preparation from the GEE.

Close modal

Data processing in GEE

The validation techniques for accuracy and classification were combined into a single script in GEE. The Random Forest (RF) classifier was used to generate a confusion matrix using the same training and validation data. These techniques can be categorized into two approaches: supervised classification methods like RF, or those based on pixels, objects, or a combination of both, which also utilize supervised classification techniques like RF (Gislason et al. 2006; Tatsumi et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2015). The RF method is highly effective for non-parametric machine learning strategy. For this investigation, RF was used as it yielded as almost precise quality findings for land use (Qu et al. 2022). When compared to other well-known remote sensing technologies, its usage in mapping land use and land cover offers several advantages, including greater accuracy (Zeferino et al. 2020).

Training and validation

For identifying LULC, classify the study area using pixels and pixel-based RF machine learning approach that was applied in GEE cloud computing. The high-resolution photos from Google Earth were manually processed to collect the training and validation samples for this study. In the GEE, 80% of the sample data is used for model training and validation, while 20% is reserved for testing. A confusion matrix is generated based on the results, and the model accuracy is evaluated. For every LULC map, the model accuracy must be more than 90%. Until the required accuracy standards are reached, and the procedure is repeated if the accuracy is less than 90%. By using a continuous improving method, the model performance is ensured to meet the necessary requirements. From the six bands that are available, which are B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, and B7, a subset of three bands is frequently used. The selected bands, which are commonly used for analysis, are B2, B3, and B4. A total of approximately 350 sample data points are typically collected, which are then divided evenly among all the classification categories. This ensures that each class has a representative number of samples to facilitate accurate model training and validation.

Strahler stream order

The Strahler stream order has been prepared for the study area and is shown in Figure 5. When two streams of the same order connect in the Strahler stream ordering system, the order increases by 1. Smaller streams have lower order numbers than the main river, which has the largest order number. The mainstream channel, which is the primary source of drainage water in the study area, is assigned the highest Strahler stream order number. In this case, the mainstream channel has a Strahler stream order of 5, indicating that it is the largest and most prominent waterway in the drainage basin as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5

Map showing the Strahler Stream Order.

Figure 5

Map showing the Strahler Stream Order.

Close modal

Trend analysis and variability of temperature

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of maximum and minimum average temperatures on annual and seasonal scales. The results are visualized through a series of Figure 6(a)–6(e) that provide a detailed examination of temperature trends. Figure 6(a) illustrates the annual maximum and minimum average temperatures. The highest annual maximum temperature recorded was 32.2 °C, while the lowest minimum temperature was 18.7 °C. The upward trend indicates a gradual increase in both maximum and minimum temperatures over the years, reflecting regional warming. The seasonal analysis in Figure 6(b) shows the time series of winter season temperatures. The highest value shown for maximum temperature ranges from 24.5 to 28.2 °C, and the minimum temperature ranges from 10.4 to 12.4 °C. Figure 6(c) depicts the time series analysis of the pre-monsoon season for maximum and minimum temperatures. Maximum temperature fluctuates between 33.4 and 38.5 °C, and minimum temperatures range from 20.2 to 23.1 °C. The monsoon season analysis in Figure 6(d) shows the maximum temperatures vary between 31.3 and 33.5 °C, while minimums range from 23.3 to 24.9 °C. Figure 6(e) illustrates the time series analysis of the post-monsoon season for maximum and minimum temperature. Maximum temperature ranges from 28.2 to 31.0 °C, while minimum temperature fluctuates between 16.1 and 19.6 °C. Figure 6(f) presents the variation of extreme minimum and maximum monthly temperatures. The descriptive analysis of maximum average temperature is provided in Table 3, which shows the lowest value observed as 24.5 °C in winter, the highest value as 38.5 °C in pre-monsoon, and the mean ranging from 25.8 to 36.0 °C. This suggests that the study area is prone to temperature extremes, which can have significant implications for agriculture, human health, and other sectors. Table 3 presents the descriptive statistics of the maximum average temperature, with the lowest value observed as 24.5 °C in winter, the highest value as 38.5 °C in pre-monsoon and the mean ranges from 25.8 to 36 °C. Table 4 presents the descriptive statistics of the minimum average temperature, with the lowest value observed as 10.4 °C in winter, the highest as 24.9 °C in monsoon, and the mean ranging from 11.4 to 24.2 °C. The results can be used to better understand and predict temperature patterns in the region.
Table 3

Descriptive statistics of Tmax

VariableObserved dataLowestHighestMeanStd. deviation
Annual max average 33 30.3 32.2 31.1 0.4 
Winter (DJF) 33 24.5 28.2 25.8 0.9 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 33 33.4 38.5 36.0 0.9 
Monsoon (JJAS) 33 31.3 33.5 32.2 0.6 
Post-monsoon (ON) 33 28.2 31.0 29.5 0.6 
VariableObserved dataLowestHighestMeanStd. deviation
Annual max average 33 30.3 32.2 31.1 0.4 
Winter (DJF) 33 24.5 28.2 25.8 0.9 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 33 33.4 38.5 36.0 0.9 
Monsoon (JJAS) 33 31.3 33.5 32.2 0.6 
Post-monsoon (ON) 33 28.2 31.0 29.5 0.6 
Table 4

Descriptive statistics of Tmin

VariableObserved dataLowestHighestMeanStd. deviation
Annual min average 33 18.7 20.1 19.3 0.3 
Winter (DJF) 33 10.4 12.4 11.4 0.5 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 33 20.2 23.1 21.5 0.6 
Monsoon (JJAS) 33 23.3 24.9 24.2 0.4 
Post-monsoon (ON) 33 16.1 19.6 17.8 0.8 
VariableObserved dataLowestHighestMeanStd. deviation
Annual min average 33 18.7 20.1 19.3 0.3 
Winter (DJF) 33 10.4 12.4 11.4 0.5 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 33 20.2 23.1 21.5 0.6 
Monsoon (JJAS) 33 23.3 24.9 24.2 0.4 
Post-monsoon (ON) 33 16.1 19.6 17.8 0.8 
Figure 6

(a–f) Temporal analysis of Tmax and Tmin: (a) annual; (b) winter; (c) pre-monsoon; (d) monsoon; (e) post-monsoon; and (f) variation of extreme minimum and maximum monthly temperature of the Hatia dam catchment in the period of 1991 to 1993.

Figure 6

(a–f) Temporal analysis of Tmax and Tmin: (a) annual; (b) winter; (c) pre-monsoon; (d) monsoon; (e) post-monsoon; and (f) variation of extreme minimum and maximum monthly temperature of the Hatia dam catchment in the period of 1991 to 1993.

Close modal

The trend analysis of maximum and minimum temperatures using MK and Sen's slope estimators revealed significant findings. Table 5 demonstrates an increasing trend in annual maximum average temperature, as well as in winter, monsoon, and post-monsoon maximum temperatures, with pre-monsoon temperature also showing a rising trend. This analysis suggests a correlation between the rising maximum temperatures, particularly in recent years, and a decreasing trend in rainfall. Studies on climate change and its impacts on biodiversity and wetlands support the idea that annual and seasonal temperatures are indeed on the rise. The escalation in maximum temperature is associated with reduced rainfall, leading to diminished drainage, likely due to altered atmospheric conditions affecting precipitation patterns and subsequent drainage systems. Furthermore, Table 6 indicates a significant increasing trend in annual minimum average and monsoon temperatures, while winter, pre-monsoon, and post-monsoon temperatures exhibit an insignificant increasing trend. The notable increase in annual minimum average and monsoon temperatures aligns with the overall warming of the climate. In contrast, the insignificant trends in winter, pre-monsoon, and post-monsoon temperatures suggest that these seasons are less impacted by climate change or that other factors, such as local weather patterns, play a more dominant role during these periods. This nuanced pattern of temperature changes across different seasons underscores the diverse impacts of climate change on temperature trends throughout the year.

Table 5

Trend analysis of Tmax

Series\TestKendall's taup-valueSen's slopeTrendTrend (at 5% level of confidence)
Annual max avg 0.246 0.046 0.016 Increasing Significance 
Winter (DJF) 0.129 0.299 0.016 Increasing Insignificance 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) −0.030 0.816 −0.003 Decreasing Insignificance 
Monsoon (JJAS) 0.269 0.029 0.027 Increasing Significance 
Post-monsoon (ON) 0.239 0.053 0.024 Increasing Insignificance 
Series\TestKendall's taup-valueSen's slopeTrendTrend (at 5% level of confidence)
Annual max avg 0.246 0.046 0.016 Increasing Significance 
Winter (DJF) 0.129 0.299 0.016 Increasing Insignificance 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) −0.030 0.816 −0.003 Decreasing Insignificance 
Monsoon (JJAS) 0.269 0.029 0.027 Increasing Significance 
Post-monsoon (ON) 0.239 0.053 0.024 Increasing Insignificance 
Table 6

Trend analysis of Tmin

Series\TestKendall's taup-valueSen's slopeTrendTrend (at 5% level of confidence)
Annual min avg 0.326 0.008 0.015 Increasing Significance 
Winter (DJF) 0.235 0.057 0.021 Increasing Insignificance 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 0.068 0.588 0.005 Increasing Insignificance 
Monsoon (JJAS) 0.367 0.003 0.019 Increasing Significance 
Post-monsoon (ON) 0.133 0.285 0.014 Increasing Insignificance 
Series\TestKendall's taup-valueSen's slopeTrendTrend (at 5% level of confidence)
Annual min avg 0.326 0.008 0.015 Increasing Significance 
Winter (DJF) 0.235 0.057 0.021 Increasing Insignificance 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 0.068 0.588 0.005 Increasing Insignificance 
Monsoon (JJAS) 0.367 0.003 0.019 Increasing Significance 
Post-monsoon (ON) 0.133 0.285 0.014 Increasing Insignificance 

Trend analysis and variability of rainfall

The graphical representation of rainfall patterns and trends over time or across several regions can be achieved using a variety of methods, including charts, graphs, and maps. To clearly illustrate the distribution and fluctuations, rainfall data is often shown visually. Prior to trend analysis, the spatial patterns of rainfall distribution throughout the research region were better understood with the Thiessen polygons method. The spatial distribution of rainfall data is done by IDW method. The result of the IDW is shown below in the Figure 7, which represents the spatial distribution of rainfall varies from 1,160 to 1,211 mm.
Figure 7

Spatial distribution of rainfall in the Hatia dam catchment in the period of 1991–2023.

Figure 7

Spatial distribution of rainfall in the Hatia dam catchment in the period of 1991–2023.

Close modal
The temporal variation of seasonal and annual rainfall for the Hatia dam catchment is analyzed for the study period 1991 to 2023. Pre-monsoon, monsoon, post-monsoon, and winter seasons are included in the seasonal rainfall. The graphs presented in Figure 8(a)–8(e), which illustrate the trends in annual and seasonal rainfall patterns. A decreasing trend in annual rainfall is observed in Figure 8(a), decreasing trend in winter season rainfall (Figure 8(b)), an increasing trend in pre-monsoon rainfall (Figure 8(c)) and again a decreasing trend in monsoon season rainfall is observed in Figure 8(d). Figure 8(e) suggests a slightly decreasing trend in post-monsoon season rainfall. The overall pattern emerging from these figures suggests a shift in rainfall trends towards the pre-monsoon season. The increasing trend observed in pre-monsoon rainfall contrasts with the decreasing trends seen in the other seasons, including the annual rainfall. This shift in rainfall patterns has significant implications for water resource management, agriculture, and ecosystem dynamics in the region. The decreasing trends in annual, monsoon, and post-monsoon rainfall may lead to water scarcity, reduced agricultural productivity, and changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. In the result, the highest rainfall observed in 1994 was 2,504.55 mm and the lowest rainfall seen in 2018 was 703.75 mm in the Hatia dam catchment. The reason for the highest rainfall in 1994 and the lowest rainfall in 2018 may have been due to variations in the cyclonic storm frequency and the intensity of the jet stream, which is a narrow band of fast-moving air currents in the upper atmosphere over the Indian Ocean and drives the monsoon depression during the Southwest monsoon season (Gadgil 2003).
Figure 8

Temporal analysis of rainfall during 1991–2023.

Figure 8

Temporal analysis of rainfall during 1991–2023.

Close modal

The MK test and Sen's slope estimator were applied to identify a pattern in the time series data. The performed test was executed at the 5% level of significance, and the results of the MK test and Z-statistics showed both positive and negative trends for the seasonal and annual rainfall time series. Monsoon rainfall showed a statistically significant negative trend (P < 0.05), while winter and post-monsoon rainfall showed a statistically insignificant negative trend (P < 0.05).

Table 7 shows the statistics of rainfall including the maximum, mean, minimum, and standard deviation values. This provides a comprehensive overview of the rainfall statistics for that time frame, with the highest rainfall occurring at 2163.1 mm annually and the lowest being 98.9 in winter maximum rainfall. Table 8 shows the result of Kendall's tau, p-value, Sen's slope, and trend at 5% level of confidence. In this result, it can be clearly seen that annual and monsoon rainfall is decreasing with a significant trend. In the pre-monsoon season, there is an insignificant increasing trend, while winter and post-monsoon seasons exhibit an insignificant decreasing trend. Negative Sen's slope values indicate a decreasing trend, while positive values signify an increasing trend. The Z-statistics for annual rainfall revealed the largest negative value, while those for winter rainfall revealed the lowest negative value. This result is consistent with the findings of (Chandniha et al. (2017). The authors have observed that over the region of Ranchi district for the period of 1901–2014, there were positive Z-statistics values for pre-monsoon and post-monsoon rainfall time series and negative Z-statistics values for winter, monsoon, annual and post-monsoon rainfall time series. Sharma & Singh (2017) show that pre-monsoon and post-monsoon rainfall trends in Jharkhand were increasing, but trends in the winter, monsoon, and annual rainfall series were found to be decreasing for a period of 102 years. This pattern reflects varying temperature trends with rainfall pattern along different season.

Table 7

Descriptive statistics of rainfall

VariableObserved dataLowestHighestMeanStandard deviation
Annual (MM) 33 703.7 2504.6 1212.9 370.5 
Winter (DJF) 33 0.0 98.9 35.1 28.2 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 33 7.9 251.8 88.8 53.4 
Monsoon (JJAS) 33 563.3 2163.1 1001.8 336.3 
Post-monsoon (ON) 33 5.1 361.2 87.1 76.8 
VariableObserved dataLowestHighestMeanStandard deviation
Annual (MM) 33 703.7 2504.6 1212.9 370.5 
Winter (DJF) 33 0.0 98.9 35.1 28.2 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 33 7.9 251.8 88.8 53.4 
Monsoon (JJAS) 33 563.3 2163.1 1001.8 336.3 
Post-monsoon (ON) 33 5.1 361.2 87.1 76.8 
Table 8

Trend analysis of rainfall during 1991 to 2023

Series\TestKendall's taup-valueSen's slopeTrendTrend (at 5% level of confidence)
Annual (MM) −0.348 0.005 −20.193 Decreasing Significant 
Winter (DJF) −0.021 0.877 −0.064 Decreasing Insignificant 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 0.061 0.631 0.400 Increasing Insignificant 
Monsoon (JJAS) −0.428 0.000 −20.059 Decreasing Significant 
Post-monsoon (ON) −0.064 0.609 −0.543 Decreasing Insignificant 
Series\TestKendall's taup-valueSen's slopeTrendTrend (at 5% level of confidence)
Annual (MM) −0.348 0.005 −20.193 Decreasing Significant 
Winter (DJF) −0.021 0.877 −0.064 Decreasing Insignificant 
Pre-monsoon (MAM) 0.061 0.631 0.400 Increasing Insignificant 
Monsoon (JJAS) −0.428 0.000 −20.059 Decreasing Significant 
Post-monsoon (ON) −0.064 0.609 −0.543 Decreasing Insignificant 

LULC changes

The temporal changes in the LULC of the study area have been derived using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) tools. The LULC classification was carried out using GEE for the pre-monsoon and the post-monsoon seasons. The results of this LULC classification were used as input into ArcGIS to analyse the changes in the study area for the period from 1993 to 2023 at the interval of 5 year each i.e., LULC prepared for the years 1993, 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013, 2018, and 2023 for both pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons. The changes of LULC are represented in Figure 9(a)–9(g) with the percentages shown in the legend. The overall changes occurring in LULC from 1993 to 2023 as shown in Figure 9(a)–9(g) in pre-monsoon as waterbody, built-up, forest cover, barren land and agriculture were 4.94–8.68%, 2.71–11.08%, 4.10–4.31%, 6.62–4.81%, and 81.63–71.105%, respectively. During the post-monsoon period, the changes in waterbody, built-up, forest cover, barren land and agriculture area were 7.3–10.06%, 2.74–11.27%, 4.12–4.37%, 6.53–4.85%, and 79.32–69.44%, respectively. The changes in LULC patterns have significant implications for the environment, ecosystem services, and human well-being. The loss of agricultural land and the expansion of built-up areas can lead to soil degradation, water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. The increase in waterbody area may have positive effects on the environment, but it also raises concerns about the impact on local ecosystems and the potential for waterborne diseases. In agriculture, poor water management techniques, insufficient drainage infrastructure, or improper irrigation techniques can cause waterlogging and increase the danger of localized flooding (Ares et al. 2024). Thus, reducing the adverse impacts of agriculture on food production requires the implementation of sustainable land management techniques including soil conservation, riparian area transplanting, and controlled drainage. From Figure 9, it is observed that due to the construction of Ranchi Ring Road there is a decrease in the water body surface area, resulting in a lack of water availability for the people living nearby to the area. In Northeast India's wooded watersheds, noted a similar pattern of declining water discharge levels because of LULC shifts (Debnath et al. 2022). As observed in the results, the growth of built-up areas in the Hatia catchment increases from 2.71 to 11.08% (pre-monsoon) is more noticeable. This indicates that pressures from urban expansion in Ranchi, especially after the Ranchi ring road was built, may have had a greater impact on patterns of hydrology (Ranjan & Singh 2022). Vegetation is being transformed into built-up areas because of rapid urbanization. The vegetation affects the drainage rate at which water may pass through pores and roots, which permeate the soil (Singh et al. 2024). Unplanned urban growth can interfere with natural hydrological processes, such as groundwater recharge and surface flow patterns, changing the timing and volume of runoff (Mabrouk et al. 2024). Further study discovered that urbanization decreases aquifer recharge and infiltration, which is consistent with our findings of decreased groundwater retention (Saddique et al. 2020). The rise in built-up areas from 2.71 to 11.08% (pre-monsoon) and 2.74 to 11.27% (post-monsoon) is consistent with trends seen in other parts of India that are quickly urbanizing. The LULC pattern changes in response to urban growth were also reported and these alterations had a major effect on natural drainage and water retention capacity (Patra et al. 2012).
Figure 9

LULC changes in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons: (a) 1993; (b) 1998; (c) 2003; (d) 2008; (e) 2013; (f) 2018; and (g) 2023.

Figure 9

LULC changes in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons: (a) 1993; (b) 1998; (c) 2003; (d) 2008; (e) 2013; (f) 2018; and (g) 2023.

Close modal

Changes in reservoir surface area in the Hatia dam catchment

The changes in the reservoir surface area of the Hatia dam catchment in both pre-monsoon and post-monsoon periods are shown in Figure 10(a)–10(g). The changes were analyzed to understand the impact of rainfall and its effect on the quantity of water in the reservoir area. As shown in Figure 10(a), the total reservoir surface area was 240.06 ha in 1993, when a rainfall of 1,535.92 mm occurred, which contributed to the reservoir in the post-monsoon and increased the reservoir surface area to 352.44 ha. In the same way, Figure 10(b)–10(d) shows an increase in the surface area of the reservoir from 415.67 to 541.98 ha, 369.41 to 440.74 ha, 380.05 to 501.28 ha for rainfalls 1561.90, 1329.03, 1450.10 mm in years 1998, 2003, 2008 respectively. The construction of the Ranchi ring road in 2011 had an impact on the reservoir surface area, leading to blockages in drainage pathways and disturbances in runoff patterns during rainfall. As depicted in Figure 10(e), the surface area of the reservoir changed from 486.1 to 535.15 ha, when there was a rainfall of 1191.70 mm. The surface area in the reservoir has decreased because of the decreasing rainfall, particularly during the monsoon season. For instance, the rainfall dropped from 1191.70 mm in 2013 to 703.75 mm in 2018, due to this the surface area of reservoir also decreases rapidly with the findings that considerable water stress is being caused by decreasing monsoon rainfall in other parts of Jharkhand (Sharma & Singh 2017). This disruption resulted in a decrease in the water requirement in Ranchi town. Figure 10(f)–10(g) show changes in surface area from 389.63 to 427.06 ha and 405.99 to 449.54 ha for rainfall 703.75 and 942.24 mm, respectively. In 2016, the reservoir experienced severe drying up due to minimal annual rainfall of about 728.01 mm, leading to a significant water crisis. The construction of the Ranchi ring road, for instance, disrupted the natural drainage patterns and affected the reservoir's water storage capacity. In response to this situation, the government implemented measures to revive the reservoir, such as removing silt particles and deepening the reservoir to enhance its water-holding capacity and address the water scarcity issue.
Figure 10

Reservoir surface area changes in (a) 1993; (b) 1998; (c) 2003; (d) 2008; (e) 2013; (f) 2018; and (g) 2023.

Figure 10

Reservoir surface area changes in (a) 1993; (b) 1998; (c) 2003; (d) 2008; (e) 2013; (f) 2018; and (g) 2023.

Close modal

Land use change of waterbody with rainfall

To investigate the impact of LULC changes on waterbodies, corresponding to variations in rainfall during the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon periods is shown in Figure 11. In 1993, the changes in the waterbody with rainfall exhibited a significant decrease as compared to 2013; This may primarily be due to the construction of the Ranchi Ring Road, which led to increased encroachment and reduced drainage intensity, resulting in a notable expansion of the distance between the waterbody and the surrounding areas. After the year 2013, a decline in rainfall was observed, with the lowest recorded rainfall occurring in 2016 and 2018. This decrease in rainfall led to the drying up of the Hatia dam reservoir, affecting the water supply in Ranchi city, which did not meet the required demand.
Figure 11

Waterbody changes with the rainfall in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons.

Figure 11

Waterbody changes with the rainfall in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons.

Close modal

Land use change in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon

The changes in LULC observed from 1993 to 2023, as depicted in Figure 12(a) and 12(b), show significant variations in built-up areas, forests, barren lands, and agriculture during the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons. During the pre-monsoon period, the built-up area increased from 2.71 in 1993 to 11.08% in 2023, while the forest cover remained relatively stable, changing from 4.10 to 4.31%. Barren land decreased from 6.62 to 4.81%, and agriculture decreased from 81.63 to 71.10%. Figure 11 shows the variation of rainfall with changes in surface area of the reservoir in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon. The highest changes observed in reservoir surface area occurred in 1998, while the lowest changes were seen in the year 2018.The significant reduction in surface area changes between these 2 years suggests a shift in the hydrological dynamics of the reservoirs. In the post-monsoon season, the built-up area expanded from 2.74% in 1993 to 11.27% in 2023. Forest cover increased slightly from 4.12 to 4.37%, while barren land decreased from 6.53 to 4.85% and agricultural land decreased from 79.32 to 69.44%.
Figure 12

Land-use changes in (a) pre-monsoon and (b) post-monsoon seasons.

Figure 12

Land-use changes in (a) pre-monsoon and (b) post-monsoon seasons.

Close modal

These changes highlight the significant impact of urbanization and infrastructure development on the landscape, with a notable increase in built-up areas and a corresponding decrease in agricultural lands. The relatively stable forest cover suggests that conservation efforts may have helped maintain the existing forest areas during this period. Table 9 shows the changes in Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) classes and their corresponding areas during the post-monsoon season, along with the annual rainfall data. Table 10 shows the changes observed in the reservoir surface area during pre-monsoon and post-monsoon rainfall events. The data indicates that when rainfall is less, the drainage water that flows into the reservoir is also less. However, following the construction of the Ranchi Ring Road, the drainage into the reservoir is expected to be less than the previous runoff. This reduction in drainage can be attributed to the altered hydrological dynamics in the catchment area due to the construction of the ring road. The road infrastructure may have disrupted the natural flow of water, leading to reduced runoff into the reservoir. Tables 11 and 12 present the changes in the reservoir over five-year intervals during the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon periods, respectively from 1993 to 2023. In the pre-monsoon period, there is an increase in the percentage change in waterbody, built-up area, and forest cover by 3.74, 8.37, and 0.21%, respectively. Furthermore, there is a decrease in the percentage change in barren land and agricultural area by 1.81 and 10.53%, respectively. During the post-monsoon season, similar trends are observed, with a slight variation in the percentage changes. The waterbody, built-up area, and forest cover increased by 2.76, 8.53, and 0.25%, respectively. Barren land and agricultural area decreased by 1.68 and 9.88%, respectively. These changes highlight the significant impact of urbanization and infrastructure development on the landscape, with a notable increase in built-up areas and a corresponding decrease in agricultural lands.

Table 9

LULC classes for post-monsoon in area (ha)

YearWaterbodyBuilt-upForestBarrenAgriculture
Annual rainfall (mm)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)
1993 1535.92 375.40 141.14 212.05 335.80 4081.51 
1998 1561.89 530.74 160.37 234.31 270.98 3905.26 
2003 1329.03 468.81 197.29 213.42 231.31 3908.11 
2008 1450.10 525.51 258.47 242.96 212.62 3785.90 
2013 1259.42 598.92 402.75 215.07 218.51 3588.50 
2018 703.76 482.54 460.68 133.08 189.97 3594.86 
2023 942.25 508.28 569.65 221.04 245.21 3509.05 
YearWaterbodyBuilt-upForestBarrenAgriculture
Annual rainfall (mm)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)Post-monsoon (ha)
1993 1535.92 375.40 141.14 212.05 335.80 4081.51 
1998 1561.89 530.74 160.37 234.31 270.98 3905.26 
2003 1329.03 468.81 197.29 213.42 231.31 3908.11 
2008 1450.10 525.51 258.47 242.96 212.62 3785.90 
2013 1259.42 598.92 402.75 215.07 218.51 3588.50 
2018 703.76 482.54 460.68 133.08 189.97 3594.86 
2023 942.25 508.28 569.65 221.04 245.21 3509.05 
Table 10

Changes in the reservoir area with rainfall

Rainfall (mm)
Reservoir surface area (ha)
Changes in reservoir surface area
YearPre-monsoonPost-monsoonPre-monsoonPost-monsoon
1993 115.90 1420.02 240.06 352.44 112.38 
1998 215.57 1346.32 415.67 541.98 126.31 
2003 93.93 1235.10 369.41 440.74 71.33 
2008 65.57 1384.53 380.06 501.42 121.36 
2013 146.34 1113.08 486.09 535.15 49.06 
2018 109.18 594.58 389.63 427.07 37.44 
2023 123.81 818.43 406 449.54 43.54 
Rainfall (mm)
Reservoir surface area (ha)
Changes in reservoir surface area
YearPre-monsoonPost-monsoonPre-monsoonPost-monsoon
1993 115.90 1420.02 240.06 352.44 112.38 
1998 215.57 1346.32 415.67 541.98 126.31 
2003 93.93 1235.10 369.41 440.74 71.33 
2008 65.57 1384.53 380.06 501.42 121.36 
2013 146.34 1113.08 486.09 535.15 49.06 
2018 109.18 594.58 389.63 427.07 37.44 
2023 123.81 818.43 406 449.54 43.54 
Table 11

Percentage changes of LULC during the 5-year interval from 1993 to 2023 in the pre-monsoon season

Land use classYears
1993–19981998–20032003–20082008–20132013–20182018–20231993–2023
Waterbody 3.55 −0.54 0.43 1.96 −2.18 0.52 3.74 
Built-up 0.38 0.8 1.13 2.67 1.32 2.07 8.37 
Forest 0.4 −0.27 0.38 −0.38 0.05 0.03 0.21 
Barren −1.24 −0.62 −0.2 −0.1 0.63 −0.28 −1.81 
Agriculture −3.09 0.62 −1.74 −4.15 0.18 −2.35 −10.53 
Land use classYears
1993–19981998–20032003–20082008–20132013–20182018–20231993–2023
Waterbody 3.55 −0.54 0.43 1.96 −2.18 0.52 3.74 
Built-up 0.38 0.8 1.13 2.67 1.32 2.07 8.37 
Forest 0.4 −0.27 0.38 −0.38 0.05 0.03 0.21 
Barren −1.24 −0.62 −0.2 −0.1 0.63 −0.28 −1.81 
Agriculture −3.09 0.62 −1.74 −4.15 0.18 −2.35 −10.53 
Table 12

Percentage changes of LULC during the 5-year interval from1993 to 2023 in the post-monsoon season

Land use classYears
1993–19981998–20032003–20082008–20132013–20182018–20231993–2023
Waterbody 3.1 −1.06 1.12 1.5 −2.32 0.42 2.76 
Built-up 0.4 0.79 1.21 2.62 1.4 2.11 8.53 
Forest 0.47 −0.34 0.58 −0.53 0.07 0.25 
Barren −1.22 −0.7 −0.38 0.13 0.67 −0.18 −1.68 
Agriculture −2.77 1.32 −2.54 −3.7 0.17 −2.36 −9.88 
Land use classYears
1993–19981998–20032003–20082008–20132013–20182018–20231993–2023
Waterbody 3.1 −1.06 1.12 1.5 −2.32 0.42 2.76 
Built-up 0.4 0.79 1.21 2.62 1.4 2.11 8.53 
Forest 0.47 −0.34 0.58 −0.53 0.07 0.25 
Barren −1.22 −0.7 −0.38 0.13 0.67 −0.18 −1.68 
Agriculture −2.77 1.32 −2.54 −3.7 0.17 −2.36 −9.88 

The Hatia dam located in the Subarnarekha river is mainly built for the purpose of water supply to the Ranchi city. Due to the construction of the Ranchi ring road in the catch area of the Hatia reservoir, significant decrease in the surface area has been noticed. As a result, studies on the impacts of LULC changes on the water body are very essential in this study area. Also, the effect of rainfall and temperature pattern on the water body has been carried out.

The analysis of rainfall data from 1991 to 2023 shows a significant decrease in annual, monsoon, post-monsoon, and winter rainfall and an increase during pre-monsoon season in the Hatia dam catchment. This has led to reduced inflow and drying up of the reservoir resulting a decrease in water supply to Ranchi town. The LULC analysis using GEE reveals a substantial increase in built-up areas from 2.71 to 11.08% during the pre-monsoon period and 2.74 to 11.27% during the post-monsoon period. The decrease in Hatia dam's water surface area from 126.31 to 37.44 ha shows that urbanization may lead to severe water shortages, posing risks to both human populations and local ecosystems. Climate projections suggest that rainfall patterns will continue to shift, exacerbating the already stressed hydrological systems in the region. The results highlight the urgent requirement for sustainable approaches to water management to tackle the combined consequences of increasing urbanization and climatic variability. Failure to address these issues could result in further depletion of water supplies, increased flooding risks, and long-term damage to the environment. The Ranchi ring road development has significantly affected water drainage into the reservoir, highlighting the significance of integrating environmental assessments into urban planning. To ensure the sustainable management of water resources in rapidly urbanizing region like Ranchi, the following policy recommendations should be considered such as integrated urban planning, sustainable drainage systems, water conservation and efficiency programs, climate-resilient infrastructure, and monitoring and regulation. Thus, urgent policy interventions are needed to ensure that water resources are managed sustainably and that urban growth is aligned with climate adaptation strategies.

The author would like to thankfully acknowledge the India Meteorological Department, Pune.

S.K. contributed to literature review, conceptualization, and data curation. V.P.K. contributed to methodology, result analysis, conclusion, and writing the original manuscript. V.S. contributed to conceptualization AND supervision. R.T. contributed to reviewing and editing the original manuscript.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahmad
I.
,
Tang
D.
,
Wang
T.
,
Wang
M.
&
Wagan
B.
(
2015
)
Precipitation trends over time using Mann–Kendall and spearman's Rho tests in swat river basin, Pakistan
.
Advances in Meteorology
,
2015
,
431860
.
Ares
M. G.
,
Zabala
M. E.
,
Dietrich
S.
,
Vercelli
N.
,
Entraigas
I.
,
Gregorini
C. A.
,
Marcovecchio
R.
&
Aispún
Y.
(
2024
)
Drainage network dynamics in an agricultural head water sub-basin
,
Science of the Total Environment
,
914
,
169826
.
ISSN 0048-9697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scito tenv.2023.169826
.
Ayivi
F.
&
Jha
M. K.
(
2018
)
Estimation of water balance and water yield in the Reedy Fork-Bufallow Creek Watershed in North Carolina using SWAT
,
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
,
6
,
203
213
.
Chandniha
S. K.
,
Meshram
S. G.
,
Adamowski
J. F.
&
Meshram
C.
(
2017
)
Trend analysis of precipitation in Jharkhand State, India: investigating precipitation variability in Jharkhand State
,
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
,
130
,
261
274
.
Deoli
V.
&
Kumar
D.
(
2020
)
Analysis of groundwater fluctuation using GRACE satellite data
,
Indian Journal of Ecology
,
47
(
2
),
299
302
.
Gabiri
G.
,
Diekkrüger
B.
,
Näschen
K.
,
Leemhuis
C.
,
van der Linden
R.
,
Majaliwa
J. G. M.
&
Obando
J. A.
(
2020
)
Impact of climate and land use/land cover change on the water resources of a tropical inland valley catchment in Uganda, East Africa
,
Climate
,
8
(
7
),
83
.
Gadgil
S.
(
2003
)
The Indian monsoon and its variability
,
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
,
31
,
429
467
.
doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.141251
.
Gajbhiye
S.
,
Meshram
C.
,
Mirabbasi
R.
&
Sharma
S. K.
(
2016
)
Trend analysis of rainfall time series for Sindh River basin in India
,
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
,
125
,
593
608
.
(Accessed 28 December 2008)
.
Gislason
P. O.
,
Benediktsson
J. A.
&
Sveinsson
J. R.
(
2006
)
Random forests for land cover classification
,
Pattern Recognition Letters
,
27
(
4
),
294
300
.
Jain
S. K.
&
Kumar
V.
(
2012
)
Trend analysis of rainfall and temperature data for India
,
Current Science
,
10
,
37
49
.
Karpouzos
D. K.
,
Kavalieratou
S.
&
Babajimopoulos
C.
(
2010
)
Trend analysis of rainfall data in pieria region
,
European Water
,
30
,
31
40
.
Kendall
M. G.
(
1975
)
Rank Correlation Methods
.
London
:
Charles Griffin
.
Kumar
A.
,
Pandey
A.
,
Hoda
N.
&
Jeyaseelan
A.
(
2011
)
Evaluation of urban sprawl pattern in the tribal-dominated cities of jharkhand state, India
,
International Journal of Remote Sensing.
,
32
,
7651
7675
.
10.1080/01431161.2010.527391
.
Lee
S. J.
&
Berbery
E. H.
(
2012
)
Land cover change effects on the climate of the La Plata basin
,
Journal of Hydrometeorology
,
13
(
1
),
84
102
.
Mabrouk
M.
,
Han
H.
,
Abdrabo
K. I.
,
Mahran
M. G. N.
,
AbouKorin
S. A. A.
,
Nasrallah
S.
,
Shen
G.
,
Fan
C.
,
Yousry
A.
&
Hafez
H. M.
(
2024
)
Spatial congruency or discrepancy? Exploring the spatiotemporal dynamics of built-up expansion patterns and flood risk
,
Science of The Total Environment
,
915
,
170019
.
Mann
H. B.
(
1945
)
Nonparametric tests against trend
,
Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society
,
13
,
245
259
.
Meshram
S. G.
,
Singh
V. P.
&
Meshram
C.
(
2017
)
Long-term trend and variability of rainfall in chhattisgarh state, India
,
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
,
129
,
729
744
.
Patakamuri
S. K.
,
Muthiah
K.
&
Sridhar
V.
(
2020
)
Long-term homogeneity, trend, and change-point analysis of rainfall in the arid district of Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh state, India
,
Water
,
12
(
1
), 211.
Patra
J. P.
,
Mishra
A.
,
Singh
R.
&
Raghuwanshi
N. S.
(
2012
)
Detecting rainfall trends in twentieth century (1871–2006) over Orissa state, India
,
Climatic Change
,
111
(
3
),
801
817
.
Priyadarshi
N.
&
Dutt
K. L.
(
2000
)
Social and gender issues in the stone quarries around Ranchi City, Jharkhand, India
.
Unpublished report
.
Qu
L. A.
,
Li
M.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Liu
W.
,
Zhi
J.
&
Zhang
L.
(
2022
)
Mapping large area tea plantations using progressive random forest and Google Earth Engine
,
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
,
16
(
2
),
024509
.
Ranjan
S.
&
Singh
V.
(
2022
)
HEC-HMS based rainfall-runoff model for punpun river basin
,
Water Practice and Technology
,
17
(
5
),
986
1001
.
Rautela
K. S.
,
Kumar
D.
,
Goutham
B.
,
Gandhi
R.
,
Kumar
A.
&
Dubey
A. K.
(
2023
)
Long-term hydrological simulation for the estimation of snowmelt contribution of Alaknanda River Basin, Uttarakhand using SWAT
,
AQUA - Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society
,
72
(
2
),
139
159
.
Sa'adi
Z.
,
Shahid
S.
,
Ismail
T.
,
Chung
E. S.
&
Wang
X. J.
(
2019
)
Trends analysis of rainfall and rainfall extremes in sarawak, Malaysia using modified mann–Kendall test
,
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
,
131
(
3
),
263
277
.
Sen
P. K.
(
1968
)
Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau
,
Journal of the American Statistical Association
,
63
,
1379
1389
.
Sertel
E.
,
Robock
A.
&
Ormeci
C.
(
2010
)
Impacts of land cover data quality on regional climate simulations
,
International Journal of Climatology
,
30
,
1942
1953
.
Souza
C. M.
,
Shimbo, J. Z., Rosa, M. R., Parente, L. L., Alencar, A. A., Rudorff, B. F. T., Hasenack, H., Matsumoto, M., Ferreira, L. G., Souza-Filho, P. W. M., de Oliveira, S. W., Rocha, W. F., Fonseca, A. V., Marques, C. B., Diniz, C. G., Costa, D., Monteiro, D., Rosa, E. R., Vélez-Martin, E., Weber, E. J., Lenti, F. E. B., Paternost, F. F., Pareyn, F. G. C., Siqueira, J. V., Viera, J. L., Ferreira Neto, L. C., Saraiva, M. M., Sales, M. H., Salgado, M. P. G., Vasconcelos, R., Galano, S., Mesquita, V. V. & Azevedo, T.
(
2020
)
Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with landsat archive and earth engine
,
Remote Sensing
,
12
(
17
),
2735
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735
.
Tatsumi
K.
,
Yamashiki
Y.
,
Torres
M. A. C.
&
Taipe
C. L. R.
(
2015
)
Crop classification of upland fields using Random forest of time-series Landsat 7 ETM+ data
,
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
,
115
,
171
179
.
Wang
Z.
,
Lai
C.
,
Chen
X.
,
Yang
B.
,
Zhao
S.
&
Bai
X.
(
2015
)
Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
527
,
1130
1141
.
Xu
Z. X.
,
Li
J. Y.
&
Liu
C. M.
(
2007
)
Long term trend analysis for major climate variables in the Yellow River basin
,
Hydrological Processes
,
21
,
1935
1948
.
Zeferino, L. B., de Souza, L. F. T., do Amaral, C. H., Fernandes Filho, E. I. & de Oliveira, T. S. (2020) Does environmental data increase the accuracy of land use and land cover classification? International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 91, 102128.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/).