In the (adsorption) competition between NOM and MIB, who is the winner, and why? | Citedby Results | Water Supply | IWA Publishing

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

In the (adsorption) competition between NOM and MIB, who is the winner, and why?

Water Supply (2002) 2 (2): 59–67.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

The adsorption of biogenetic odorants onto activated carbon: Adsorption characteristics and impacts of algal organic matter

Junzhi Zhang
Fan Lu
Xiao He
Yu Liao
Rumeng Chen
Rongjun Xia
Yuchen Shang
Qi Wang
Jianwei Yu

Environmental Research (2023) 238: 117072.

Engineered pine nut shell derived activated carbons for improved removal of recalcitrant pharmaceuticals in urban wastewater treatment

Ana S. Mestre
Rui M.C. Viegas
Elsa Mesquita
Maria João Rosa
Ana P. Carvalho

Journal of Hazardous Materials (2022) 437: 129319.

Comparing and modeling organic micro-pollutant adsorption onto powdered activated carbon in different drinking waters and WWTP effluents

Frederik Zietzschmann
Geert Aschermann
Martin Jekel

Water Research (2016) 102: 190.

Adsorption of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol onto powdered activated carbon at non-equilibrium conditions: Influence of NOM and process modelling

Kristin Zoschke
Christina Engel
Hilmar Börnick
Eckhard Worch

Water Research (2011) 45 (15): 4544.

Granular Activated Carbon Adsorption of 2-Methylisoborneol (MIB): Pilot- and Laboratory-Scale Evaluations

Lionel Ho
Gayle Newcombe

Journal of Environmental Engineering (2010) 136 (9): 965.

The role of surface acidity and pore size distribution in the adsorption of 2-methylisoborneol via powdered activated carbon

Matthew F. Tennant
David W. Mazyck

Carbon (2007) 45 (4): 858.