Aerated lagoons are used in developing and developed countries to treat domestic and industrial wastewater especially from small communities. They represent a reliable method of biological treatment capable of producing satisfactory effluent throughout the year. They are preferred to several other treatment processes like the activated sludge because of the simplicity of the overall system, less need for trained operator assistance and very competitive overall cost of wastewater treatment. In Québec where there are some 1400 small municipalities this method of treatment is found to perform satisfactorily, notwithstanding the extreme temperature variations. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the performance of this method of waste stabilization from the point of view of organic removal, retention time, power requirement and nutrient removal without chemical coagulation. An existing treatment plant with aerated lagoons was used for the study. The results show that a summer retention time of about 8 days can produce an effluent having 20-25 mg/L of BOD, 20 mg/L of SS and 2-3 mg/L of total phosphates without coagulant addition.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 1987
Performance of Aerated Lagoons in Treating Wastewater from Small Communities
K. S. Narasiah;
K. S. Narasiah
*Professor of Sanitary Engineering, Départment de Génie Civil, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Morasse;
C. Morasse
**Project Engineer, Gendron Lefebvre, Inc., Place Laval, Suite 150, Laval, Quebec H7N 1A1, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Larue
M. Larue
***Project Engineer, Patry, Laporte Inc., Experts Conseils 943, Blvd Tascherau, Longueuil, Québec J4K 2X2, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (1987) 19 (1-2): 65–76.
Citation
K. S. Narasiah, C. Morasse, M. Larue; Performance of Aerated Lagoons in Treating Wastewater from Small Communities. Water Sci Technol 1 January 1987; 19 (1-2): 65–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1987.0189
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 2.430
CiteScore 3.4 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021
35
Views
0
Citations