The conventional practice for an anoxic denitrification basin has been to minimize oxygen input on the basis that it is detrimental to the process. For existing secondary treatment systems, allotting 25-35% of the aeration volume for an unaerated anoxic zone will significantly reduce plant capacity. Further, one group has held that bulking control is best achieved by eliminating all forms of oxygen from the initial contact or biological selector zones. The Phoenix 91st Avenue WWTP was designed with nitrate recycle to aerated selector zones and the anoxic zones were provided with a dense array of fine bubble diffusers. The prototype NdeN process was able to maintain the 1.31 m3/s secondary capacity with aerated anoxic zone receiving 20-25% of the total airflow. Net sludge yields were 30-50% higher than anticipated due to primary clarifier solids losses at higher flows which reduced SRTT to ≤ 5 days. At 5.0-5.5 day SRTT, effluent averaged 8.3 mg/L TN, 1.75 mg/L NH4N and 5.7 mg/L NO3N. Nitrobacter N oxidation rates were unexplainably lower than the Nitrosomonas N oxidation rates causing effluent NO2N.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 01 1994
Aerated Anoxic Biological NdeN Process
O. E. Albertson;
O. E. Albertson
*Enviro Enterprises, Inc., PO Box 65312, Salt Lake City, UT 84165-0312, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
H. D. Stensel
H. D. Stensel
**University of Washington, Department of Civil Engineering, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (1994) 29 (7): 167–176.
Citation
O. E. Albertson, H. D. Stensel; Aerated Anoxic Biological NdeN Process. Water Sci Technol 1 April 1994; 29 (7): 167–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0334
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00