The undesired deposition of microorganisms and the formation of biofilms is called “biofouling”. The consequences of biofouling for water purification, transport and storage are considerable both economically and ecologically. Countermeasures against biofouling include three steps: i) detection, ii) sanitization and iii) prevention of biofouling. The detection has to refer to surfaces. Cell counts in water water samples do not reflect the location or the extent of biofilms. Biocides display only limited value in terms of removal of biofouling layers. First, biofilm organisms are protected against biocides and tolerate 10 to 1000-fold higher concentrations. Second, water systems usually cannot be kept sterile. Thus, dead biofilms provide nutrients and suitable surfaces for further growth of cells imported with the raw water. Cleaning of a system is an integral part of sanitization and even more important than disinfection. It has to be based on a designed strategy. Efficiency control is mandatory and has to occur on representative surfaces. The prevention of biofouling is frequently achieved by continuously dosage of biocides. However, this is only possible with suitable raw waters and many failures are reported. Chlorine is still the biocide most frequently used. Concerns about effectivity and environmental protection give rise to other strategies. “Good housekeeping” is recommended as a general countermeasure. It includes frequent cleaning, efficiency control, biofilm monitoring, limitation of nutrients, maintenance of high shear forces, and a cleaning-friendly design. “Biofouling” is operationally defined and refers to biofilm development which exceeds a given “threshold of interference”. Keeping biofilm development below that threshold offers a new strategy, which considers biofouling as a biofilm reactor in the wrong place. Nutrient limitation is an option to curb biofilm development in sensitive areas. If large colonization areas are offered elsewhere than in the system to be protected, biofilms will develop there, sequestering dissolved nutrients and turning them into immobilized biomass in a place where it can be handled more easily than, e.g., inside a heat exchanger or a membrane module. Combined with effective monitoring techniques, a biocide-free antifouling-strategy can be realized.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
September 01 1996
Antifouling strategies in technical systems – a short review
Hans-Curt Flemming;
Hans-Curt Flemming
*Lehrstuhl für Wassergüte-und Abfallwirtschaft der TU München, Am Coulombwall, D-85748 Garching, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas Griebe;
Thomas Griebe
**Institut für Siedlungswasserbau, Wassergüte-und Abfallwirtschaft der Universität Stuttgart, Bandtäle 1, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Gabriela Schaule
Gabriela Schaule
***Biofilm Control, Löwenstr. 100, 70597 Stuttgart, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (1996) 34 (5-6): 517–524.
Citation
Hans-Curt Flemming, Thomas Griebe, Gabriela Schaule; Antifouling strategies in technical systems – a short review. Water Sci Technol 1 September 1996; 34 (5-6): 517–524. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1996.0591
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00