Photocatalysis is a promising technology for the purification of pretreated wastewaters in sun-rich countries if an economically applicable reactor system is available. Within this project the catalyst separation as an essential process step of suspended reactor systems was investigated. For the separation of suspended catalyst a sedimentation basin with and without lamella and a membrane filtration were investigated. The sedimentation was found to be very sensitive to the kind of the ion background of wastewater, the pH, the TiO2 influent concentration as well as the hydrodynamics in the clarifier. Under optimized conditions effluent concentrations of less than 5 mg SS/L and a clear water without turbidity could be reached with a specific flow rate of up to 0.7 m3/m2/h. The best performance for P25 was achieved with a TiO2 influent concentration of 5 g/L. Membrane filtration was the only method to guarantee a complete retention of the TiO2 as well as a rejection of microorganisms and high molecular compounds. With cross-flow velocities of 3 m/s and a transmembrane pressure of 100 kPa flux rates up to 1200 L/m2/h were achieved. A flow-film-reactor (FFR) was operated with the model compound DCA under identical conditions with fixed and suspended TiO2. Whereas the fixed system has the advantage that no separation step is necessary and a simple construction can be used, suspended systems offer a three times higher reaction velocity for a catalyst concentration of 10 g/L, but are also characterized by higher investment costs.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
September 01 2001
Comparison of suspended and fixed photocatalytic reactor systems
S.-U. Geissen;
S.-U. Geissen
*Institut für Thermische Verfahrenstechnik, Clausthal University of Technology, Leibnizstr. 15, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
W. Xi;
W. Xi
*Institut für Thermische Verfahrenstechnik, Clausthal University of Technology, Leibnizstr. 15, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Weidemeyer;
A. Weidemeyer
*Institut für Thermische Verfahrenstechnik, Clausthal University of Technology, Leibnizstr. 15, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Vogelpohl;
A. Vogelpohl
*Institut für Thermische Verfahrenstechnik, Clausthal University of Technology, Leibnizstr. 15, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Bousselmi;
L. Bousselmi
**Institut National de Recherche Scientifique et Technique B.P. 95, 2050 Hammam Lif, Tunisia
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Ghrabi;
A. Ghrabi
**Institut National de Recherche Scientifique et Technique B.P. 95, 2050 Hammam Lif, Tunisia
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Ennabli
A. Ennabli
**Institut National de Recherche Scientifique et Technique B.P. 95, 2050 Hammam Lif, Tunisia
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2001) 44 (5): 245–249.
Citation
S.-U. Geissen, W. Xi, A. Weidemeyer, A. Vogelpohl, L. Bousselmi, A. Ghrabi, A. Ennabli; Comparison of suspended and fixed photocatalytic reactor systems. Water Sci Technol 1 September 2001; 44 (5): 245–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0297
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 1.915
CiteScore 3.3 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021