The Colifast Early Warning System, based on measuring β-galactosidase activity (2 h method), was evaluated for monitoring the level of faecal contamination in the upper tidal Thames. Two trials were performed, one following heavy rain in November 2000, the next during a dry and sunny period in July 2001. In general the b-galactosidase activity and the two coliform reference methods (recovery following membrane filtration with membrane lauryl sulphate broth (MLSB) and Colilert™ Quantitray) were comparable. However, in several samples in July the β-galactosidase activity seemed to overestimate the number of culturable coliforms, suggesting that the rapid enzymatic method detected β-galactosidase produced by other bacterial sources, such as Aeromonas spp. or Vibrio spp., or nonculturable coliforms. The latter could be attributed to sunlight-induced injury. Nevertheless, the rapid method based on β-galactosidase activity gave an estimate of the level of culturable coliforms, which did not differ from both coliform reference methods by more than one log. Monitoring of β-galactosidase activity in river water samples using the Colifast Analyser may therefore be useful as an early warning indicator of faecal contamination.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01 2002
Monitoring faecal contamination of the Thames estuary using a semiautomated early warning system
I. Tryland;
*Colifast AS, PO Box 31, N-1324 Lysaker, Norway (E-mail: ingun.tryland@colifast.no; james.berg@colifast.no)
E-mail: ingun.tryland@colifast.no
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Surman;
S. Surman
**Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Ave, London NW9 5HT, UK (E-mail: ssurman@PHLS.org.uk)
Search for other works by this author on:
J.D. Berg
J.D. Berg
*Colifast AS, PO Box 31, N-1324 Lysaker, Norway (E-mail: ingun.tryland@colifast.no; james.berg@colifast.no)
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2002) 46 (3): 25–31.
Citation
I. Tryland, S. Surman, J.D. Berg; Monitoring faecal contamination of the Thames estuary using a semiautomated early warning system. Water Sci Technol 1 August 2002; 46 (3): 25–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0047
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Impact Factor 2.430
CiteScore 3.4 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021