We evaluated quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and RTqPCR (for RNA species) for their ability to quantify microorganisms and viruses in problematic environmental samples such as cattle manure, digester material, wastewater and soil. Important developments included a standard spiking approach which compensated for methodological bias and allowed sample-to-sample comparison and reliable quantification. Programme CeTe was developed to calculate endogenous concentrations of target organisms (nucleic acid copies) for each sample separately from the generated standard curves. The approach also permitted assessment of the detection limit of the complete method, including extraction. It varied from sample to sample, due to different extraction efficiencies and variable co-extraction of PCR inhibitors. False negative results were thereby avoided. By using this approach we were able to optimise a DNA extraction protocol from the different tested sample types. Protocols for the extraction of RNA species from environmental samples were also optimised. DNA was (almost) not degraded after lethal shock (autoclaving) in the sterile environment. In contrast, the parallel selective cultivation and qPCR results for various microbial parameters from an anaerobic digester chain suggested that DNA from decaying organisms was readily recycled in metabolically active environments. It may, therefore, be used to determine viable organisms in samples exhibiting substantial metabolic turnover. It is proposed that our standard spiking approach, including data evaluation by the program CeTe, should be considered in future standardisation and norms for the quantification of nucleic acid containing organisms in environmental and product samples.
Evaluating real-time PCR for the quantification of distinct pathogens and indicator organisms in environmental samples
M. Lebuhn, M. Effenberger, G. Garcés, A. Gronauer, P.A. Wilderer; Evaluating real-time PCR for the quantification of distinct pathogens and indicator organisms in environmental samples. Water Sci Technol 1 July 2004; 50 (1): 263–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0065
Download citation file:
Impact Factor 1.915
CiteScore 3.3 • Q2
13 days from submission to first decision on average