As part of a study examining the efficacy of high-rate algal pond treatment of high-strength abattoir wastewater, the impact of pond configuration and loading rate on nitrification was determined. The extent of nitrification in all ponds was consistent with mass balance estimates of oxygen demand and availability. Deeper ponds were more stable nitrifying systems, with shallow ponds displaying greater variation in response to changes in nitrogen loading. In a separate experiment the pond system was modified by covering a part of an in-series HRAP to exclude light, providing conditions suitable for denitrification. Specific denitrification rates were often within the range typical for endogenous carbon sources, with mass balance calculations indicating removals of up to 95%.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 01 2005
Performance of a pilot-scale high rate algal pond system treating abattoir wastewater in rural South Australia: nitrification and denitrification
R.A. Evans;
1Department of Environmental Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia (E-mail: nancy.cromar@flinders.edu.au; howard.fallowfield@flinders.edu.au)
E-mail: richard.evans@flinders.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
N.J. Cromar;
N.J. Cromar
1Department of Environmental Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia (E-mail: nancy.cromar@flinders.edu.au; howard.fallowfield@flinders.edu.au)
Search for other works by this author on:
H.J. Fallowfield
H.J. Fallowfield
1Department of Environmental Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia (E-mail: nancy.cromar@flinders.edu.au; howard.fallowfield@flinders.edu.au)
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2005) 51 (12): 117–124.
Citation
R.A. Evans, N.J. Cromar, H.J. Fallowfield; Performance of a pilot-scale high rate algal pond system treating abattoir wastewater in rural South Australia: nitrification and denitrification. Water Sci Technol 1 June 2005; 51 (12): 117–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0443
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 1.915
CiteScore 3.3 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021