Understanding the limitations of environmental data is essential both for managing environmental systems effectively and for encouraging the responsible use of scientific research when knowledge is limited and priorities are varied. Using a combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques for assessing probabilities, and acknowledging the importance of scenarios where probabilities cannot be determined, an integrated methodology is presented for handling uncertainties about environmental data. The methodology is based on a fourfold distinction between the empirical quality of data (and the ancillary information, such as ‘scale’, required to interpret this), the sources of uncertainty in data, the ‘fitness for use’ of the data, and the quality or ‘goodness’ of an uncertainty model.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
September 01 2005
An integrated methodology for recording uncertainties about environmental data
J.D. Brown;
*Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (E-mail: brown@science.uva.nl)
E-mail: brown@science.uva.nl
Search for other works by this author on:
G.B. Heuvelink;
G.B. Heuvelink
**ALTERRA and Laboratory of Soil Science and Geology, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 37, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands, (E-mail: gerard.heuvelink@wur.nl)
Search for other works by this author on:
J.C. Refsgaard
J.C. Refsgaard
***Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, K, Denmark, (E-mail: jcr@geus.dk)
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2005) 52 (6): 153–160.
Citation
J.D. Brown, G.B. Heuvelink, J.C. Refsgaard; An integrated methodology for recording uncertainties about environmental data. Water Sci Technol 1 September 2005; 52 (6): 153–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0163
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 2.430
CiteScore 3.4 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021
42
Views
28
Citations