Uncertainties in model structures have been recognised often to be the main source of uncertainty in predictive model simulations. Despite this knowledge, uncertainty studies are traditionally limited to a single deterministic model and the uncertainty addressed by a parameter uncertainty study. The extent to which a parameter uncertainty study may encompass model structure errors in a groundwater model is studied in a case study. Three groundwater models were constructed on the basis of three different hydrogeological interpretations. Each of the models was calibrated inversely against groundwater heads and streamflows. A parameter uncertainty analysis was carried out for each of the three conceptual models by Monte Carlo simulations. A comparison of the predictive uncertainties for the three conceptual models showed large differences between the uncertainty intervals. Most discrepancies were observed for data types not used in the model calibration. Thus uncertainties in the conceptual models become of increasing importance when predictive simulations consider data types that are extrapolates from the data types used for calibration.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| September 01 2005
Model uncertainty – parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models
Water Sci Technol (2005) 52 (6): 177–186.
A.L. Højberg, J.C. Refsgaard; Model uncertainty – parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models. Water Sci Technol 1 September 2005; 52 (6): 177–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0166
Download citation file: