Microbial quality of reclaimed water can be adequately interpreted by graphical adjustment of experimental results to a lognormal probability distribution; the method serves to verify the degree of conformity to the proposed distribution and to visualize the time variability of the results. A conventional physico-chemical treatment can inactivate up to 1.0 μlog of common bacterial indicators, while maintaining time variability below 1.0 (μlog/100 ml). Dissolved organic matter in the influent will significantly alter the performance and the reliability of disinfection process, highlighting the need for improved adjustments of disinfectant dose to actual quality of treated water. Although those process may reach inactivation rates as high as 6.0 μlog for common bacterial indicators, their reliability may be considerably affected, forcing standard deviations beyond 3.0 (μlog/100 ml). Natural processes can provide inactivation rates from 3.0 to 3.5 for common microbial indicators, under the weather conditions studied. Although those values are lower than those of physical and chemical disinfectants, the reliability of natural processes is more stable, with standard deviations ranging from 0.65 to 1.1 (μlog/100 ml). Natural processes are particularly sensible to external inputs of microbial indicators, due to the presence of wildlife.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 01 2008
Process reliability and significance of reclaimed water quality parameters
R. Mujeriego;
1School of Civil Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Jordi Girona 1-3, Building D-1, 08034, Barcelona, Spain
E-mail: rafael.mujeriego@upc.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
K. Peters
K. Peters
2Department of Water Chemistry, University of Karlsruhe, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2008) 57 (5): 667–674.
Citation
R. Mujeriego, K. Peters; Process reliability and significance of reclaimed water quality parameters. Water Sci Technol 1 April 2008; 57 (5): 667–674. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.179
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 1.915
CiteScore 3.3 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021