Odour measurement via olfactometry is expensive and has a low accuracy compared with chemical or physical methods. In addition, olfactometry is not suited for online monitoring. Hence, an accurate online method for emission measurement would be an enormous improvement. There are several options to more or less replace the offline olfactometry by online measurement available today. Most common are H2S-concentration as a single gas parameter and VOC and TOC as composite parameters. A fairly new development are multi sensor arrays, usually referred to as “electronic noses” which carry out non-specific gas measurement and deliver measurement data that can visualized as a fingerprint diagram. This paper outlines the use of these different parameters and compares the results to those gained via olfactometry of several case studies.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
May 01 2009
H2S, VOC, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems
W. Franke;
1Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (DESEE), Kassel University, Kurt-Wolters-Str. 3, Kassel 34125, Germany E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
F.-B. Frechen;
F.-B. Frechen
1Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (DESEE), Kassel University, Kurt-Wolters-Str. 3, Kassel 34125, Germany E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Giebel
S. Giebel
1Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (DESEE), Kassel University, Kurt-Wolters-Str. 3, Kassel 34125, Germany E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2009) 59 (9): 1721–1726.
Citation
W. Franke, F.-B. Frechen, S. Giebel; H2S, VOC, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems. Water Sci Technol 1 May 2009; 59 (9): 1721–1726. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.127
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00