New Zealand has over 1000 anaerobic waste stabilisation ponds treating wastewater from farms and industry. Traditional anaerobic ponds were not designed to optimise anaerobic digestion to produce biogas and are therefore uncovered, releasing biogas to the atmosphere, which can cause odour problems and contributes to GHG emissions. The biogas production and treatment performance of an anaerobic piggery pond retrofitted with a perimeter cover working under field conditions was monitored over a 14 month period. The cover design proved successful in capturing biogas, mitigating odour and GHG issues and coping with New Zealand weather conditions. High solids removal rates (73% and 86% for TS and VS respectively) were achieved. An annual average biogas methane production rate of 0.263 m3 CH4/kgVSadded was observed, which is similar to gas production rates of mesophilic farm waste digesters, and indicates that the prolonged hydraulic and solids retention times of covered anaerobic ponds can fully compensate for lower operating temperatures. These results suggest that covered anaerobic ponds treating agricultural wastes in New Zealand have great potential to reduce odour and GHG emissions and recover renewable energy, while producing an easy to handle effluent for land irrigation or further treatment.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
February 01 2010
Biogas recovery from a temperate climate covered anaerobic pond
S. Heubeck;
1National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), P. O. Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand E-mail: r.craggs@niwa.co.nz
E-mail: s.heubeck@niwa.co.nz
Search for other works by this author on:
R. J. Craggs
R. J. Craggs
1National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), P. O. Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand E-mail: r.craggs@niwa.co.nz
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2010) 61 (4): 1019–1026.
Citation
S. Heubeck, R. J. Craggs; Biogas recovery from a temperate climate covered anaerobic pond. Water Sci Technol 1 February 2010; 61 (4): 1019–1026. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.965
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.