The COST/IWA Benchmark Simulation Model No 1 (BSM1) has been available for almost a decade. Its primary purpose has been to create a platform for control strategy benchmarking of activated sludge processes. The fact that the research work related to the benchmark simulation models has resulted in more than 300 publications worldwide demonstrates the interest in and need of such tools within the research community. Recent efforts within the IWA Task Group on “Benchmarking of control strategies for WWTPs” have focused on an extension of the benchmark simulation model. This extension aims at facilitating control strategy development and performance evaluation at a plant-wide level and, consequently, includes both pretreatment of wastewater as well as the processes describing sludge treatment. The motivation for the extension is the increasing interest and need to operate and control wastewater treatment systems not only at an individual process level but also on a plant-wide basis. To facilitate the changes, the evaluation period has been extended to one year. A prolonged evaluation period allows for long-term control strategies to be assessed and enables the use of control handles that cannot be evaluated in a realistic fashion in the one week BSM1 evaluation period. In this paper, the finalised plant layout is summarised and, as was done for BSM1, a default control strategy is proposed. A demonstration of how BSM2 can be used to evaluate control strategies is also given.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 01 2010
Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy
I. Nopens;
1BIOMATH, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Benedetti;
L. Benedetti
1BIOMATH, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
U. Jeppsson;
U. Jeppsson
2IEA, Lund University, Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
M.-N. Pons;
M.-N. Pons
3LSGC-CNRS-ENSIC-INPL, 1 rue Grandville, BP 451, F-54001 Nancy cedex, France
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Alex;
J. Alex
4ifak e.V. Magdeburg, Steinfeldstr. 3, D-39179 Barleben, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
J. B. Copp;
J. B. Copp
5Primodal, Inc., 122 Leland Street, Hamilton Ontario L8S 3A4, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
K. V. Gernaey;
K. V. Gernaey
6Deptartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Rosen;
C. Rosen
7Veolia Water—Solutions & Technology, VA-Ingenjörerna, Scheelegatan 3, SE-212 28 Malmö, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
J.-P. Steyer;
J.-P. Steyer
8INRA, UR050, Laboratoire de Biotechnologie de l'Environnement, Avenue des Etangs, Narbonne F-11100, France
Search for other works by this author on:
P. A. Vanrolleghem
P. A. Vanrolleghem
9modelEAU, Dépt de génie civil, Université Laval, Québec, G1K 7P4 QC, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2010) 62 (9): 1967–1974.
Citation
I. Nopens, L. Benedetti, U. Jeppsson, M.-N. Pons, J. Alex, J. B. Copp, K. V. Gernaey, C. Rosen, J.-P. Steyer, P. A. Vanrolleghem; Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy. Water Sci Technol 1 November 2010; 62 (9): 1967–1974. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.044
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00