The use of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) or best management practice is becoming increasingly common. However, rather than adopting the preferred ‘treatment train’ implementation, many developments opt for end-of-pipe control ponds. This paper discusses the use of SuDS in series to form treatment trains and compares their potential performance and effectiveness with end-of-pipe solutions. Land-use, site and catchment characteristics have been used alongside up-to-date guidance, Infoworks CS and MUSIC to determine whole-life-costs, land-take, water quality and quantity for different SuDS combinations. The results presented show that the use of a treatment train allows approaches differing from the traditional use of single SuDS, either source or ‘end-of-pipe’, to be proposed to treat and attenuate runoff. The outcome is a more flexible solution where the footprint allocated to SuDS, costs and water quality can be managed differently to fully meet stakeholder objectives.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| May 01 2011
Runoff infiltration, a desktop case study
N. R. P. Bastien;
S. G. Wallis;
Water Sci Technol (2011) 63 (10): 2300–2308.
N. R. P. Bastien, S. Arthur, S. G. Wallis, M. Scholz; Runoff infiltration, a desktop case study. Water Sci Technol 1 May 2011; 63 (10): 2300–2308. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.181
Download citation file: