A comparison of two different medium scale MBRs (ultrafiltration and microfiltration) using respirometric methods has been achieved. The ultrafiltration membrane plant (0.034 µm pore size) maintained recirculation sludge flow at seven times the influent flow, and membranes were backwashed every 5 min and chemically cleaned weekly. The microfiltration membrane plant (0.4 µm pore size) maintained recirculation sludge flow at four times the influent flow, membrane-relax was applied after the production phase and membranes were chemically cleaned in the event of high trans-membrane pressure. Both technologies showed a similar performance with regard to heterotrophic kinetic and stoichiometric parameters and organic matter effluent concentrations. The influent was characterized by means of its COD fractions and the average removal percentages for COD concentrations were around 97% for both plants in spite of influent COD fluctuation, temperature variations and sludge retention time (SRT) evolution. Both SRT evolution and temperature affect the heterotrophic yield (YH) and the decay coefficient (bH) in the same range for both plants. YH values of over 0.8 mg COD/mg COD were obtained during the unsteady periods, while under steady state conditions these values fell to less than 0.4 mg COD/mg COD. bH by contrast reached values of less than 0.05 d−1.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 01 2011
Respirometric assays of two different MBR (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) to obtain kinetic and stoichiometric parameters Available to Purchase
L. M. Ruiz;
1Technologies for Water Management and Treatment Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering and Water Research Institute, University of Granada, Ramón y Cajal 4, P.C. 18071, Granada, Spain
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Arévalo;
J. Arévalo
1Technologies for Water Management and Treatment Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering and Water Research Institute, University of Granada, Ramón y Cajal 4, P.C. 18071, Granada, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Parada;
J. Parada
1Technologies for Water Management and Treatment Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering and Water Research Institute, University of Granada, Ramón y Cajal 4, P.C. 18071, Granada, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
D. González;
D. González
1Technologies for Water Management and Treatment Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering and Water Research Institute, University of Granada, Ramón y Cajal 4, P.C. 18071, Granada, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
B. Moreno;
B. Moreno
1Technologies for Water Management and Treatment Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering and Water Research Institute, University of Granada, Ramón y Cajal 4, P.C. 18071, Granada, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Pérez;
J. Pérez
1Technologies for Water Management and Treatment Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering and Water Research Institute, University of Granada, Ramón y Cajal 4, P.C. 18071, Granada, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
M. A. Gómez
M. A. Gómez
1Technologies for Water Management and Treatment Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering and Water Research Institute, University of Granada, Ramón y Cajal 4, P.C. 18071, Granada, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2011) 63 (11): 2478–2485.
Citation
L. M. Ruiz, J. Arévalo, J. Parada, D. González, B. Moreno, J. Pérez, M. A. Gómez; Respirometric assays of two different MBR (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) to obtain kinetic and stoichiometric parameters. Water Sci Technol 1 June 2011; 63 (11): 2478–2485. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.578
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00