Cities of the future face challenges with respect to the quantity and quality of water resources, and multiple managerial options need to be considered in order to safeguard urban surface water quality. In a recently completed project on ‘Source control options for reducing emissions of Priority Pollutants’ (ScorePP), seven emission control strategies (ECSs) were developed and tested within a semi-hypothetical case city (SHCC) to evaluate their potential to reduce the emission of selected European priority hazardous substances (PHSs) to surface waters. The ECSs included (1) business-as-usual, (2) full implementation of relevant European (EU) directives, (3) ECS2 in combination with voluntary options for household, municipalities and industry, (4) ECS2 combined with industrial treatment and best available technologies (BAT), (5) ECS2 in combination with stormwater and combined sewer overflow treatment, (6) ECS2 in combination with advanced wastewater treatment, and (7) combinations of ECS3-6. The SHCC approach was chosen to facilitate transparency, to allow compensating for data gaps and to decrease the level of uncertainty in the results. The selected PHSs: cadmium (Cd), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), nonylphenol (NP) and pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE) differ in their uses and environmental fate and therefore accumulate in surface waters to differing extents in response to the application of alternative ECS. To achieve the required reduction in PHS levels in urban waters the full implementation of existing EU regulation is prioritised and feasible combinations of managerial and technological options (source control and treatment) can be highly relevant for mitigating releases.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 01 2011
Water management in cities of the future using emission control strategies for priority hazardous substances
E. Eriksson;
1Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
D. M. Revitt;
D. M. Revitt
2School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Ledin;
A. Ledin
3Water and Environmental Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Lundy;
L. Lundy
2School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
H. C. Holten Lützhøft;
H. C. Holten Lützhøft
1Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
T. Wickman;
T. Wickman
4Environment and Health Administration, City of Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
P. S. Mikkelsen
P. S. Mikkelsen
1Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2011) 64 (10): 2109–2118.
Article history
Received:
March 25 2011
Accepted:
August 01 2011
Citation
E. Eriksson, D. M. Revitt, A. Ledin, L. Lundy, H. C. Holten Lützhøft, T. Wickman, P. S. Mikkelsen; Water management in cities of the future using emission control strategies for priority hazardous substances. Water Sci Technol 1 November 2011; 64 (10): 2109–2118. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.797
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00