The study was constructed to monitor representative inflow and outflow from infiltration and non-infiltration type best management practice (BMP) sites developed at a university campus, allowing the determination of overall performance efficiency in terms of runoff reduction and pollutant removal. Based on the monitored storm events, the runoff and discharged volume and flow rates exhibited high positive correlations with total rainfall depth (p<0.001). Findings revealed that as the total rainfall increases, the amount of volume reduction and pollutant removal decreases for both types of BMP. Infiltration BMP showed a higher ability in treatment performance especially during small storm events than non-infiltration type; however, the differences were not significant. Pollutant removal rates of infiltration type were in the range of 70–90% while between 35 and 80% for the non-infiltration type for storm events with less than 10 mm rainfall depth. Average volume reductions were 71 ± 33% and 32 ± 32% for the infiltration and non-infiltration type, respectively. The ratio of the discharge volume was significantly greater than the ratio of discharge pollutant load indicating a high potential for water quality improvement. Design recommendations were provided considering sizing and cost for on-site application of similar BMP designs in the future.
Performance comparison between infiltration and non-infiltration type of structural stormwater treatment systems
Marla C. Maniquiz, Jiyeon Choi, Soyoung Lee, Lee-Hyung Kim; Performance comparison between infiltration and non-infiltration type of structural stormwater treatment systems. Water Sci Technol 1 July 2012; 66 (2): 363–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.197
Download citation file:
Impact Factor 1.915
CiteScore 3.3 • Q2
First Decision in 30 days