A dry, batch anaerobic digestion (DBAD) process was tested on two sewage sludge types with different methanogenic seed fractions under laboratory conditions. The aim was to indicate optimal sludge:seed mixing ratios and analyse process performance based on degradation rate and reactor-specific methane production. The attained results were compared with the performance of a liquid-state, laboratory-scale stirred reactor (SR). A mixing ratio of at least 1:1.25 (sludge:seed) yielded processes free from significant inhibitions. Further seeding increments resulted in slightly better performances, but much lower sludge fractions treated in the reactors. Compared with the SR process, the DBAD reactors produced comparable degradation rates albeit in a significantly longer process and with somewhat lower reactor-specific methane production rates. These findings indicate that the DBAD method may provide a viable alternative to liquid-state processes if sludge drying is already applied and reactor volume requirements are of importance.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
July 01 2012
Process performance of dry, batch anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: methanogenic seed mixtures
B. Rózsáné Szűcs;
B. Rózsáné Szűcs
1Eötvös József College, Bajcsy-Zs. u. 14. 6500 Baja, Hungary
Search for other works by this author on:
G. L. Szántó;
2SZANCORE, Hollandseweg 62, 6706 KR Wageningen, The Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Simon;
M. Simon
1Eötvös József College, Bajcsy-Zs. u. 14. 6500 Baja, Hungary
Search for other works by this author on:
Gy. Füleky
Gy. Füleky
3Szent István University, Páter K. u. 1., 2103 Gödöllő, Hungary
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2012) 66 (2): 445–450.
Article history
Received:
January 18 2011
Accepted:
March 16 2012
Citation
B. Rózsáné Szűcs, G. L. Szántó, M. Simon, Gy. Füleky; Process performance of dry, batch anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: methanogenic seed mixtures. Water Sci Technol 1 July 2012; 66 (2): 445–450. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.223
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00