Process models used for activated sludge, anaerobic digestion and in general wastewater treatment plant process design and optimization have traditionally focused on important biokinetic conversions. There is a growing realization that abiotic processes occurring in the wastewater (i.e. ‘solvent’) have a fundamental effect on plant performance. These processes include weak acid–base reactions (ionization), spontaneous or chemical dose-induced precipitate formation and chemical redox conversions, which influence pH, gas transfer, and directly or indirectly the biokinetic processes themselves. There is a large amount of fundamental information available (from chemical and other disciplines), which, due to its complexity and its diverse sources (originating from many different water and process environments), cannot be readily used in wastewater process design as yet. This position paper outlines the need, the methods, available knowledge and the fundamental approaches that would help to focus the effort of research groups to develop a physicochemical framework specifically in support of whole-plant process modeling. The findings are that, in general, existing models such as produced by the International Water Association for biological processes are limited by omission of key corrections such as non-ideal acid–base behavior, as well as major processes (e.g., ion precipitation). While the underlying chemistry is well understood, its applicability to wastewater applications is less well known. This justifies important further research, with both experimental and model development activities to clarify an approach to modeling of physicochemical processes.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
September 01 2012
Towards a generalized physicochemical framework
Damien J. Batstone;
1Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, Australia
E-mail: damienb@awmc.uq.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Youri Amerlinck;
Youri Amerlinck
2BIOMATH, Ghent University, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
George Ekama;
George Ekama
3Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
Search for other works by this author on:
Rajeev Goel;
Rajeev Goel
4Hydromantix Environment Software Solutions, Inc. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8P 4R5
Search for other works by this author on:
Paloma Grau;
Paloma Grau
5CEIT and Tecnun (University of Navarra), Manuel de Lardizábal 15, 20018 San Sebastián, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Bruce Johnson;
Bruce Johnson
6CH2M HILL Inc., Englewood, CO 80112, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Ishin Kaya;
Ishin Kaya
7Ekologix Earth-Friendly Solutions Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Jean-Philippe Steyer;
Jean-Philippe Steyer
8INRA, UR0050, Laboratoire de Biotechnologie de l'Environnement, Avenue des Etangs, Narbonne F-11100, France
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephan Tait;
... Show more
Stephan Tait
1Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter A. Vanrolleghem;
Peter A. Vanrolleghem
10modelEAU, Université Laval, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher J. Brouckaert;
Christopher J. Brouckaert
11Pollution Research Group, School of Chemical Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Search for other works by this author on:
Eveline Volcke
Eveline Volcke
12Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2012) 66 (6): 1147–1161.
Article history
Received:
July 08 2011
Accepted:
April 23 2012
Citation
Damien J. Batstone, Youri Amerlinck, George Ekama, Rajeev Goel, Paloma Grau, Bruce Johnson, Ishin Kaya, Jean-Philippe Steyer, Stephan Tait, Imre Takács, Peter A. Vanrolleghem, Christopher J. Brouckaert, Eveline Volcke; Towards a generalized physicochemical framework. Water Sci Technol 1 September 2012; 66 (6): 1147–1161. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.300
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 2.430
CiteScore 3.4 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021
112
Views
57
Citations