The effects of pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration and external resistance on denitrifying microbial fuel cell were evaluated in terms of electricity generation characteristics and pollutant removal performance. The results showed that anodic influent with weakly alkaline or neutral pH and cathodic influent with weakly acidic pH favored pollutant removal and electricity generation. The suitable influent pH of the anode and cathode were found to be 7.5–8.0 and 6.0–6.5, respectively. In the presence of sufficient nitrate in the cathode, higher influent COD concentration led to more electricity generation and greater pollutant removal rates. With an anodic influent pH of 8.0 and a cathodic influent pH of 6.0, an influent COD concentration of 400 mg/L was deemed to be appropriate. Low external resistance favored nitrate and COD removal. The results suggest that operation of denitrifying microbial fuel cell at a lower external resistance would be desirable for pollutant removal but not electricity generation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
July 01 2013
Performance of denitrifying microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, COD concentration and external resistance
Jin-Tao Li;
Jin-Tao Li
1School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Shao-Hui Zhang;
1School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Yu-Mei Hua
Yu-Mei Hua
2College of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2013) 68 (1): 250–256.
Article history
Received:
December 12 2012
Accepted:
March 06 2013
Citation
Jin-Tao Li, Shao-Hui Zhang, Yu-Mei Hua; Performance of denitrifying microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, COD concentration and external resistance. Water Sci Technol 1 July 2013; 68 (1): 250–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.250
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00