In this study, the electricity generation and organic removal in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were examined for electrode spacing (ES) covering 5.8, 10.2, 15.1, and 19.5 cm, and for each ES the MFCs were discharged with a series of influent substrates (CODin). Results indicate that organic removal was related to CODin but not to ES. Best chemical oxygen demand (COD) removals of 64–71% could be achieved at CODin around 100 mg COD/L (0.11–0.14 kg COD/m3-day). Best power output 3.32 mW/m2 occurred at ES 5.8 cm and nominal CODin 300 mg COD/L. For every ES, the relationship of electricity generation to local substrate near anode (CODad) could be adequately modeled by Monod-type kinetics. The estimated kinetic constants involve maximum current production, Imax, 15.3–19.6 mA/m2; maximum attainable power output, Pp,max, 4.0–2.5 mW/m2; half-saturation constant of current, Ksi, 22–30 mg COD/L; and half-saturation constant of power, Ksp, 24–90 mg COD/L. This study reveals that the control over ES for improving electricity generation is dependent on the level of CODad, which profoundly affects the optimal design of electrode placement.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
October 19 2013
The effects of electrode spacing on the performance of microbial fuel cells under different substrate concentrations
Chi-Yuan Lee;
1Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Program, Department of Harbor and River Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Chinese Taiwan
E-mail: cylee@mail.ntou.edu.tw
Search for other works by this author on:
Ya-Ni Huang
Ya-Ni Huang
1Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Program, Department of Harbor and River Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Chinese Taiwan
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2013) 68 (9): 2028–2034.
Article history
Received:
May 23 2013
Accepted:
June 26 2013
Citation
Chi-Yuan Lee, Ya-Ni Huang; The effects of electrode spacing on the performance of microbial fuel cells under different substrate concentrations. Water Sci Technol 1 November 2013; 68 (9): 2028–2034. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.446
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 1.915
CiteScore 3.3 • Q2
13 days submission to first
decision
1,439,880 downloads in 2021