As a consequence of a worldwide increase of energy costs, the efficient use of sewage sludge as a renewable energy resource must be considered, even for smaller wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with design capacities between 10,000 and 50,000 population equivalent (PE). To find the lower limit for an economical conversion of an aerobic stabilisation plant into an anaerobic stabilisation plant, we derived cost functions for specific capital costs and operating cost savings. With these tools, it is possible to evaluate if it would be promising to further investigate refitting aerobic plants into plants that produce biogas. By comparing capital costs with operation cost savings, a break-even point for process conversion could be determined. The break-even point varies depending on project specific constraints and assumptions related to future energy and operation costs and variable interest rates. A 5% increase of energy and operation costs leads to a cost efficient conversion for plants above 7,500 PE. A conversion of WWTPs results in different positive effects on energy generation and plant operations: increased efficiency, energy savings, and on-site renewable power generation by digester gas which can be used in the plant. Also, the optimisation of energy efficiency results in a reduction of primary energy consumption.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 12 2013
Sludge digestion instead of aerobic stabilisation – a cost benefit analysis based on experiences in Germany
Oliver Gretzschel;
1Institute of Urban Water Management, Kaiserslautern University of Technology, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 13, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Theo G. Schmitt;
Theo G. Schmitt
1Institute of Urban Water Management, Kaiserslautern University of Technology, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 13, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Joachim Hansen;
Joachim Hansen
2Urban Water Management, University of Luxembourg, 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Search for other works by this author on:
Klaus Siekmann;
Klaus Siekmann
3Dr. Siekmann + Partner GmbH, Segbachstraße 9, 56743 Thür, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Jürgen Jakob
Jürgen Jakob
3Dr. Siekmann + Partner GmbH, Segbachstraße 9, 56743 Thür, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2014) 69 (2): 430–437.
Article history
Received:
May 15 2013
Accepted:
October 10 2013
Citation
Oliver Gretzschel, Theo G. Schmitt, Joachim Hansen, Klaus Siekmann, Jürgen Jakob; Sludge digestion instead of aerobic stabilisation – a cost benefit analysis based on experiences in Germany. Water Sci Technol 1 January 2014; 69 (2): 430–437. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.711
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00