The effect of chemical coagulation and biological auto-flocculation relative to zeta potential was examined to compare flotation and sedimentation separation processes for algae harvesting. Experiments revealed that microalgae separation is related to auto-flocculation of Anabaena spp. and requires chemical coagulation for the whole period of microalgae cultivation. In addition, microalgae separation characteristics which are associated with surfactants demonstrated optimal microalgae cultivation time and separation efficiency of dissolved CO2 flotation (DCF) as an alternative to dissolved air flotation (DAF). Microalgae were significantly separated in response to anionic surfactant rather than cationic surfactant as a function of bubble size and zeta potential. DAF and DCF both showed slightly efficient flotation; however, application of anionic surfactant was required when using DCF.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 01 2015
Flotation of algae for water reuse and biomass production: role of zeta potential and surfactant to separate algal particles
Dong-Heui Kwak;
1Department of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Seonam University, 439 Chunhyang-ro, Namwon 590-711, Republic of Korea
E-mail: kwak124@hanmail.net
Search for other works by this author on:
Mi-Sug Kim
Mi-Sug Kim
2Industry Technology Research Institute of Seonam University, 439 Chunhyang-ro, Namwon 590-711, Republic of Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Sci Technol (2015) 72 (5): 762–769.
Article history
Received:
November 21 2014
Accepted:
May 11 2015
Citation
Dong-Heui Kwak, Mi-Sug Kim; Flotation of algae for water reuse and biomass production: role of zeta potential and surfactant to separate algal particles. Water Sci Technol 1 September 2015; 72 (5): 762–769. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.265
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 1.915
CiteScore 3.3 • Q2
13 days
from submission to first decision on average!
Cited by
Subscribe to Open
This paper is Open Access via a Subscribe to Open model. Individuals can help sustain this model by contributing the cost of what would have been author fees. Find out more here.