The authors regret that the following information was incorrect in the online version of their paper and wish to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The correct information can be shown below:
On page 717 of the RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
the following paragraph:
The ORP of E-BF ranged from –341.7 mV to –493.7 mV. Meanwhile, the ORP of BF, which was not electrolyzed, was totally higher (the mean value was approximately 329.5 mV) than that of E-BF (the mean –429.7 mV) throughout the entire experiment.
Should have been shown as:
The ORP of E-BF ranged from –582.7 mV to –734.7 mV. Meanwhile, the ORP of BF, which was not electrolyzed, was totally higher (the mean value was approximately 129.5 mV) than that of E-BF (the mean –670 mV) throughout the entire experiment.