The publisher regrets that due to an error in production, Figure 4 was incorrect in the online version of the above paper. We wish to apologise to the authors and to the readers for any inconvenience caused by this error. The correct version of Figure 4 is shown below:
Figure 4
Figure 4. Rarefaction analysis estimating average α-diversity by counting the observed species in the samples of sediment (n = 2), soil (n = 2), faeces (n = 5) and water (n = 9). Error bars denote the standard deviation.
View largeDownload slide

Rarefaction analysis estimating average α-diversity by counting the observed species in the samples of sediment (n = 2), soil (n = 2), faeces (n = 5) and water (n = 9). Error bars denote the standard deviation.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Rarefaction analysis estimating average α-diversity by counting the observed species in the samples of sediment (n = 2), soil (n = 2), faeces (n = 5) and water (n = 9). Error bars denote the standard deviation.
View largeDownload slide

Rarefaction analysis estimating average α-diversity by counting the observed species in the samples of sediment (n = 2), soil (n = 2), faeces (n = 5) and water (n = 9). Error bars denote the standard deviation.

Close modal
View Original Article
© 2016 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/)