Abstract
A novel compound was synthesized by the reaction of the amino group of the chitosan with the formyl group of pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline-3-carboxaldehyde moiety, which produced chitosan modified with a Schiff base (chitosan Schiff base). The structure of the newly prepared composite was elucidated. Chitosan Schiff base was used to remove the textile anionic remazol red (RR) dye from wastewater. The kinetic data and adsorption isotherm were best fitted by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Freundlich isotherm, respectively. Thermodynamic parameters were calculated. Chitosan Schiff base resulted in 100% removal of carcinogenic dye at 2 min only with qm 344.8 mg/g, and may do the same for other anionic reactive dyes, thus avoiding secondary pollution.
INTRODUCTION
Chitosan is known to be the most plentiful and low cost biopolymer in nature; it forms most of the exoskeleton of crustaceans. Chitosan, or poly-(1, 4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-b-D-glucose, has many medical, pharmaceutical, and agricultural uses because it is a nontoxic (Zivanovic et al. 2007), heterogeneous, linear, cationic biocompatible, and biodegradable polysaccharide with a high molecular weight (El-Harby et al. 2017). By comparison with other polysaccharides, it contains about 6.9% nitrogen, which works as a chelating agent, so it is widely used in the pharmaceutical, biomedical, drug release and wound healing fields and in other applications. The unique structure of chitosan is due to the presence of active amino (–NH2) and hydroxyl (–OH) groups, which are reactive adsorption sites for many organic and inorganic water pollutants (Saud et al. 2019). A free –NH2 group results from the deacetylation of chitin, which helps in the modification of chitosan to produce different Schiff bases by reacting with several aldehydes and ketones (Manimohan et al. 2019).
Recently, chitosan derivatives have received great attention for promising applications in water and wastewater treatment technology (Saud et al. 2019). Modifying chitosan can be carried out easily using chemical or physical methods to produce chitosan derivatives with new functional groups. These methods may be used to improve its adsorption capacity or adsorption kinetics, enhancing the affinity of the sorbent and changing the selectivity of sorption (Tanhaei et al. 2016).
Schiff bases are considered one of the most important modifications for chitosan (Salama et al. 2015). These substances are used for analytical and environmental applications. There are many reports of the synthesis of Schiff bases of chitosan and their evaluation as adsorbents for dye removal. In addition, the additional N center inserted in chitosan Schiff base formation is expected to increase the adsorption capacity of chitosan towards anionic dyes by electrostatic interaction with protonated N centers (Manchaiah & Badalamoole. 2019).
Despite the presence of a large number of chitosan Schiff bases with different aldehydes (Nuriye et al. 2012; Salama et al. 2015; Elbadawy 2016), there is no research on a chitosan Schiff base incorporating a pyranoquinolinone moiety. Pyranoquinolinone (4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2,5-dioxo-5,6-dihydro-2H-pyrano[3,2c]quinoline-3-carboxaldehyde) is a very important compound in natural products and this moiety has shown antimalarial, HIV inhibitor, pharmaceutical, antischistosomal, antimicrobial and antitumor activity (Swathi et al. 2016). It is expected that the modification of chitosan with pyranoquinolinone may enhance some of the physical properties and antimicrobial activity of chitosan (Salama et al. 2015).
Industrial dye waste water, which is produced from the textile printing and dyeing industries, and from the production of food, paper, plastics and other products, results in serious health and environmental pollution due to its noticeably bright color, high toxicity and difficult degradation process. Most organic dyes are teratogenic, carcinogenic and mutagenic to human and marine life because of the presence of aromatic rings in their structure. There are also the problems of low degradability, high toxicity, and high stability to photo-degradation (Huanhuan et al. 2018; Ahmed et al. 2019). Hence, the treatment of these effluents is challenging (Manchaiah & Badalamoole 2019).
Many processes are used to purify wastewater containing dyes, but, most of these processes need appropriate conditions and have high operational costs (Amtul et al. 2018). Adsorption has been found to be very promising for removing textile dyes from wastewater (Geyse et al. 2017). Adsorption is an effective separation technique that is cost effective, simple, efficient, and non-reactive towards toxic agents (Amtul et al. 2018). Activated carbon is the most commonly used substance for dye removal by adsorption, although performance is dependent on the type of carbon used, its cost (Ukanwa et al. 2019), the characteristics of the wastewater, and the type of dye. So, the industry requires highly effective, low-cost adsorbents that are available in tonnage quantities, and do not present an environmental problem themselves (Blackburn 2004). Nowadays, there is an increasing requirement for novel polymers in industrial sectors for the effective elimination of dyes (Amtul et al. 2018). Chitosan is considered to be an active substance for the sorption of organic compounds such as phenols, metal ions, biphenyls, polychlorinated biphenyls, and proteins compared to other polymers. This is due to the presence of hydroxyl and amino groups on the polymer chains that act as the coordination and electrostatic interaction centers.
Traditionally, when chitosan has been directly used in the purification of water, it is mostly efficient in adsorbing negatively charged dyes in acidic conditions as a result of protonated amine groups. Chitosan has been used as a green cross linker, taking advantage of its amine groups as functional moieties participating in the formation of covalent bonds (Yang et al. 2016). Currently, many researchers are aiming to modify applied adsorbents to have multiple advantages such as industrial practicality, low cost, high removal rates, and (in some cases) recovery of the species involved without losing their chemical identity to be effective adsorbents in the purification of wastewater (Wan Ngaha et al. 2011; Geyse et al. 2017). Chitosan has been modified to prevent dissolution as well as to enhance the mechanical resistance and reinforcement of the chemical stability of chitosan in acidic solutions. These properties are important in an effective adsorbent (El-Harby et al. 2017).
So, the aim of present work was to study the ability of chitosan Schiff base for the removal of remazol red (RR; RB-133) dye, and compare this efficiency in absorbing dyes with other modified chitosan polymers. This was followed by the characterization of chitosan Schiff base using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). In addition, kinetic and isotherm models were studied.
EXPERIMENTAL
Chemicals
Chitosan (Sigma Aldrich), glacial acetic acid (Fisher Scientific), triethyl orthoformate (Merck), RR, sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride and hydrochloric acid were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Company Limited. All reagents were of analytical grade and were used as received. Distilled water was used in all preparations.
Synthesis of chitosan Schiff base
Firstly, 4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2,5-dioxo-5,6-dihydro-2H-pyrano[3, 2-c]quinoline-3-carboxaldehyde was synthesized according to Othman et al. (2019). Chitosan (1 mol) was dissolved in 100 mL acetic acid 5% and stirred at 50 °C for 4 hours. The aldehyde (1 mol) was dissolved in the least amount of ethanol, then the solution was added dropwise to chitosan; the mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 24 hours. An orange gel of chitosan Schiff base was formed and collected by filtration, washed several times with a mixture of ethanol and acetone to remove any unreacted materials, and dried, giving a powder. The synthesis equation of chitosan Schiff base is illustrated in Figure 1(a).
Preparation of dye solution
A stock solution of 10−2M of RR was prepared by dissolving the appropriate amount of dye in 25 mL of distilled water. The concentration needed for various steps of the investigation was prepared by dilution.
Determination of pHzpc
The pH point of zero charge (pHzpc) of the adsorbent chitosan Schiff base was determined by the powder addition method (Ponnusami et al. 2008): 0.03 g of chitosan Schiff base was added to a 100 mL conical flask containing 10 mL of 0.1 M NaCl solution. Five samples were used for different initial pH solution, called pHi. 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH solution were used to reach the required pH values. After 24 hours the final pH (pHf) was determined by pH meter Mettler Toledo.
Physicochemical characterization of chitosan Schiff base
FT-IR analysis
FT-IR measurements were performed using an FT-IR (Thermo Electron Corporation Nicolet avatar 370 CSL) with the wavenumber range 500–4,000 cm−1.
XRD
X-ray diffractograms of chitosan and chitosan Schiff base samples were obtained using ARL™ X'TRA powder diffractometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) with Cu-K-alpha wave length = 1.5405981 Å and current 44 mA – voltage 45 kV.
SEM
The chitosan Schiff base sample was analyzed using an SEM model Quanta 250 field emission gun (FEG) attached to an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis unit with accelerating voltage 30 kV, magnification 14x up to 1,000,000 and resolution for Gun.1n).
TGA
The sample was processed by Q500TA instruments.
Batch adsorption experiments
The equilibrium isotherm for adsorption was determined by using 0.1 g of adsorbent per 100 mL of aqueous solution for initial dye concentrations in the range of 10–100 ppm and pH = 5. For these experiments, the beakers were stirred at constant temperature (20 °C), for the contact time required to attain equilibrium. The solution samples were centrifuged after finishing the adsorption experiments at 7,000 rpm for 15 min. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated by measuring concentration by the UV-Visible spectroscopic method at λmax = 520 nm. The same procedures were carried out to study the effect of pH by using different initial pH ranging from 3 to 11 and analyzing the residual color at the equilibrium contact time. The pH values were obtained using 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of the prepared chitosan Schiff base
FT-IR spectra
The FT-IR spectra of pure chitosan and chitosan Schiff base are illustrated in Figure 2. The spectra of pure chitosan showed the characteristic absorption peak of OH and NH2 at 3,431 cm−1. The peaks at 2,948 and 2,866 cm−1 are attributed to C–H stretching vibration. The characteristic absorption peaks of NH, −CH3 and the second hydroxyl absorption peak (OH) appear at 1,619, 1,466 and 1,382 cm−1 respectively. For FT-IR spectra of chitosan Schiff base, there are two peaks at 1,748 (C = O α-pyrone), and 1,678 (C = O quinolone), in addition to the broad peak at around 3,424 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching vibration of N–H and O–H bonds shifted to a higher frequency (Xiaoxiao et al. 2009). Absorption bands at 1,531 cm−1 correspond to the N-H bending in secondary amides (amide II band), and those at 1,457.81, 889 cm−1 indicate OH in-plane bending, symmetrical C-H bending in CH3 at 1,161 cm−1. A peak at 1,015 cm−1 corresponds to C-O-C linkage, and 1,221 cm−1 corresponding to C-O stretching and 759 cm−1 corresponding to C-H bending can also be seen (Sashikala & Syed Shafi. 2014). A new absorption peak appeared at 1,634 cm−1, which is assigned to the azomethine group vibration (C = N). These results indicate that chitosan Schiff base formed C = N groups at the N-position (Xiaoxiao et al. 2009).
XRD
Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of the chitosan and chitosan Schiff base samples. The chitosan sample shows a strong peak at 2Ɵ = 20.4°. This suggests the formation of inter- and intra-molecular hydrogen bonds in the presence of free amino groups in chitosan. For the chitosan Schiff base, the peak at 2Ɵ of 20.4° became broader and less intense; this reflects a more amorphous nature. This is probably due to the deformation of the strong hydrogen bond in the chitosan backbone with the substitution of quinolinone aldehyde on the N-atom of chitosan (Salama et al. 2015; Xiaoxiao et al. 2016). In addition, there was higher semi-crystalline nature of the blend, which was identified by the broad amorphous peak indicating that there was a molecular miscibility and an interaction between chitosan and the pyranoquinolinone moiety (Sashikala & Syed Shafi 2014).
TGA
The thermal stability was assessed by TGA analysis, as shown in Figure 4. TGA is a good technique to determine the thermal stability of polymers and their blends. It is important for measuring the mass of the substance as a function of temperature, while the substance is exposed to a controlled temperature programme (Sashikala & Syed Shafi 2014). From the TGA curves, chitosan weight loss was observed at 281 °C which corresponds to chitosan moieties. For chitosan Schiff base, weight loss was observed at 343.05 °C. The temperature difference observed might be due to formation of chitosan Schiff. Our result proves the higher stability of chitosan Schiff base at higher temperatures.
SEM
Figure 5 shows SEM images of chitosan Schiff base; they reveal a significant surface roughness of the new composite material. This is attributed to the loss of hydrogen bonds in the chitosan chains due to chitosan Schiff base formation (Huanhuan et al. 2018). The incorporation of the bulky pyranoquinolinone group into chitosan polymer matrices also creates surface roughness (Amtul et al. 2018). The SEM image of the powdered chitosan Schiff base indicates a polymorphic porous structure (Santosh et al. 2014).
Adsorption experiments
Effect of dye concentration
By studying the effect of RR dye concentration ranging from 10 to 100 ppm on the removal of RR, we found that the R% of dye removal by chitosan Schiff base increased with increasing initial dye concentration, as shown in Figure 6, from 10 to 50 ppm, which can be explained in the terms of the presence of unsaturated sites in the chitosan Schiff base morphology. Only 50 ppm dye concentration was needed to achieve 100% dye removal. But when the concentrations of dye were higher (>50 ppm) the rate of adsorption decreased and the Figure 6 curve did not show the same asymptotic form. This may be due to all vacant sites in the chitosan Schiff base morphology being saturated by the dye molecules (El-Harby et al. 2017).
pH of dye solution
The effect of pH on the adsorption of RR dye onto chitosan Schiff base at equilibrium time [dye concentration = 50 ppm, temperature = 293 K, chitosan Schiff base dose = 0.1 g] is shown in Figure 7(a) and 7(b). Removal of RR dye increased at low pH (≤7). It is known that the pHpzc value affects a net zero charge on a solid surface in the absence of specific sorption (Elbadawy 2016). The pHpzc of chitosan Schiff base was determined by the powder addition method (Elbadawy 2016), as recorded in experimental section. Both positive and negative –ΔpH (pHi − pHf) values were recorded for the chitosan Schiff base and plotted against the initial pHi values, as shown in Figure 7(b). The zero point charge of chitosan Schiff base was found to be 5.9. So, anion adsorption onto chitosan Schiff base will be favorable at pH ≤ pHzpc, where the surface of the adsorbent becomes positively charged and favors the uptake of anionic dyes due to the increasing electrostatic force of attraction. Thus, RR adsorption onto chitosan Schiff base is increased at lower pH (<5.9). The opposite happened at high pH (>pHzpc); the adsorbent surface was negatively charged, so, it repelled the negatively charged RR anions from vacant adsorption sites, causing a decrease in dye sorption (qe values). Also, in a previous study, Jiang et al. (2013) reported that in acidic solutions chitosan is easily protonated to form positive groups because of the presence of amino groups. So, the surface of chitosan at low pH values will be positively charged but increasing pH values will gradually cause the surface to become negative at high pH (the isoelectric point of chitosan Schiff base is at pH = 5.9). However, the equilibrium time of adsorption process decreased by decreasing the pH of dye solution; at pH = 3 the adsorption removal percentage of chitosan Schiff base reached 100% in only 2 min. The results obtained indicate that ion diffusion act as physical forces effects on the behavior of dye molecules (the adsorbates) in the proximity area of the adsorbent, chitosan Schiff base. The same behavior was observed for the adsorption of remazol brilliant violet onto chitosan 10b flakes (Wan Ngaha et al. 2011).
Dosage and contact time influence on chitosan Schiff base
The effects of dosage and contact time on the removal of RR by chitosan Schiff base by varying the dosage from 0.03 to 0.15 g, keeping all other parameters constant, as shown in Figure 8. This figure shows that the amount of dye removed from the aqueous solution increased with increasing dosage of chitosan Schiff base from 0.03 to 0.1 g. But further increasing the adsorbent dose to 0.15 g did not change the R%. However, 0.1 g adsorbent dosage was sufficient to achieve 100% removal of dye from a 50 ppm dye solution and a further increase in the dosage was not required. It is obvious that an increase in adsorbent dosage increases available surface area and active sites. So, 0.1 g of chitosan Schiff base adsorbent was sufficient in all the RR adsorption experiments.
In studying the effect of contact time in Figure 8, it is clear that by using a chitosan Schiff base dose ≥0.1 g, equilibrium was attained within a short time interval (a plateau was reached in 20 min). Dye removal was rapid in the initial stage (R% = 100%) and stayed constant with the increase of time. This initial increase was due to the presence of a large number of vacant sites and with the passage of time, the number of active sites decreased, hence the reduction in the adsorption rate. Conversely, the equilibrium time increased with a decrease in the dose of chitosan Schiff base < 0.1 g, which reached 60 min (R% = 100%). This result highlights the high efficiency of the prepared modified polymer for RR dye removal compared with a previous study carried out on the adsorption of Congo red dye onto terephthaloyl thiourea cross-linked chitosan, where the adsorption equilibrium time was not reached until 200 min (El-Harby et al. 2017).
Finally, we can say that the synthesized chitosan Schiff base was shown to be a hopeful adsorbent for the removal of the textile dye RR from aqueous solutions. This is further emphasized by comparison with the maximum adsorption capacity of textile dye with different adsorbents with qmax of chitosan solids, as will be mentioned in the next isotherm study part.
Effect of temperature
The influence of temperature on the percentage dye removal onto chitosan Schiff base was studied at different temperatures: 20, 30, and 40 °C, as shown in Figure 9. It is clear that increasing the dye solution temperature increases the amount of adsorption, which confirms a kinetically controlled endothermic adsorption process. Therefore, higher temperatures facilitate the adsorption of RR onto chitosan Schiff base, because the mobility of dye molecules and their diffusion increased with increasing temperature (Wan Ngaha et al. 2011; Badawy et al. 2019). The higher removal due to increasing temperature may be attributed to chemical interactions taking place between the functional groups of the adsorbent and the dye. Also, Figure 9 shows that the shortest adsorption equilibrium time for RR dye adsorption by chitosan Schiff base was obtained at 40 °C. This may be attributed to the tumefaction effect that increasing temperature may have produced within the inner structure of chitosan Schiff base, which facilitated the penetration of dye molecules into its internal structure.
Kinetic studies and mechanism of adsorption process
Kinetic studies are commonly applied to understand the mechanism of adsorption reactions. In our study we used the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, intra-particle diffusion and Elovich models and their equations (El-Harby et al. 2017; Tran et al. 2017; Elham et al. 2019).
Based on the values of S.D. (%) and R2 given in Table 1, it is clear that the pseudo-second-order model is the best for describing the adsorption kinetics of RR dye onto chitosan Schiff base at different temperatures.
Temp. . | Conc. . | Pseudo-first-order . | Pseudo-second-order . | Intra-particle diffusion step 1 . | Intra-particle diffusion step 2 . | Elovich's kinetic model . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K1min−1 . | qe(cal) (mg/g) . | R2 . | S.D. (%) . | qe(exp) (mg/g) . | K2(g/mg min) . | qe(cal) (mg/g) . | R2 . | S.D. (%) . | KDif1 (mg/gmin_0.5) . | KDif2 (mg/gmin_1/2) . | β (g mg−1) α (g mg−1 min−1) . | ||
20 °C | 10 ppm | 0.0159 | 1.0386 | 0.0307 | 29.37 | 8.74 | 0.360 | 8.802 | 0.999 | 0.236 | 2.4 | 0.068 | β 2.271 |
R2 = 0.937 | R2 = 0.963 | α 5.5 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.845 | |||||||||||||
25 ppm | 0.108 | 2.756 | 0.886 | 29.49 | 23.91 | 0.0507 | 23.42 | 0.998 | 0.683 | 0.79 | 0.670 | β 0.61255 | |
R2 = 0.932 | R2 = 0.971 | α 0.06 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.845 | |||||||||||||
50 ppm | 0.203 | 2.765 | 0.932 | 31.42 | 48.41 | 0.0506 | 48.78 | 0.999 | 0.255 | 1.92 | 0.734 | β 0.5883 | |
R2 = 0.9479 | R2 = 0.871 | α 9.1 × 1010 | |||||||||||
R2 0.8312 | |||||||||||||
75 ppm | 0.564 | 6.613 | 0.638 | 30.28 | 72.28 | 0.0168 | 71.42 | 0.998 | 0.396 | 1.96 | 1.829 | β 0.21514 | |
R2 = 0.9674 | R2 = 0.9854 | α 0. 37 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.962 | |||||||||||||
100 ppm | 0.953 | 12.304 | 0.634 | 29.06 | 95.99 | 0.00143 | 95.24 | 0.998 | 0.260 | 3.052 | 1.485 | β 0.1746 | |
R2 = 0.9784 | R2 = 0.963 | α 1.9 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.967 | |||||||||||||
30 °C | 50 ppm | 0.151 | 2.795 | 0.935 | 29.37 | 48.41 | 0.0424 | 48.78 | 0.999 | 0.236 | — | — | – |
40 °C | 50 ppm | 0.058 | 1.755 | 0.379 | 29.49 | 48.41 | 0.084 | 48.78 | 0.999 | 0.683 | — | — | – |
Temp. . | Conc. . | Pseudo-first-order . | Pseudo-second-order . | Intra-particle diffusion step 1 . | Intra-particle diffusion step 2 . | Elovich's kinetic model . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K1min−1 . | qe(cal) (mg/g) . | R2 . | S.D. (%) . | qe(exp) (mg/g) . | K2(g/mg min) . | qe(cal) (mg/g) . | R2 . | S.D. (%) . | KDif1 (mg/gmin_0.5) . | KDif2 (mg/gmin_1/2) . | β (g mg−1) α (g mg−1 min−1) . | ||
20 °C | 10 ppm | 0.0159 | 1.0386 | 0.0307 | 29.37 | 8.74 | 0.360 | 8.802 | 0.999 | 0.236 | 2.4 | 0.068 | β 2.271 |
R2 = 0.937 | R2 = 0.963 | α 5.5 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.845 | |||||||||||||
25 ppm | 0.108 | 2.756 | 0.886 | 29.49 | 23.91 | 0.0507 | 23.42 | 0.998 | 0.683 | 0.79 | 0.670 | β 0.61255 | |
R2 = 0.932 | R2 = 0.971 | α 0.06 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.845 | |||||||||||||
50 ppm | 0.203 | 2.765 | 0.932 | 31.42 | 48.41 | 0.0506 | 48.78 | 0.999 | 0.255 | 1.92 | 0.734 | β 0.5883 | |
R2 = 0.9479 | R2 = 0.871 | α 9.1 × 1010 | |||||||||||
R2 0.8312 | |||||||||||||
75 ppm | 0.564 | 6.613 | 0.638 | 30.28 | 72.28 | 0.0168 | 71.42 | 0.998 | 0.396 | 1.96 | 1.829 | β 0.21514 | |
R2 = 0.9674 | R2 = 0.9854 | α 0. 37 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.962 | |||||||||||||
100 ppm | 0.953 | 12.304 | 0.634 | 29.06 | 95.99 | 0.00143 | 95.24 | 0.998 | 0.260 | 3.052 | 1.485 | β 0.1746 | |
R2 = 0.9784 | R2 = 0.963 | α 1.9 × 106 | |||||||||||
R2 0.967 | |||||||||||||
30 °C | 50 ppm | 0.151 | 2.795 | 0.935 | 29.37 | 48.41 | 0.0424 | 48.78 | 0.999 | 0.236 | — | — | – |
40 °C | 50 ppm | 0.058 | 1.755 | 0.379 | 29.49 | 48.41 | 0.084 | 48.78 | 0.999 | 0.683 | — | — | – |
By applying the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models for adsorption of RR onto chitosan Schiff base sample at concentrations in the range 10–100 ppm at 20 °C as shown in Figure 10(a) and 10(b), we found that pseudo-second-order model was the best fit for our experimental data. The values of qe(exp), K1, K2, qe(cal), the corresponding linear regression coefficient R2 values and calculated S.D. (%) are summarized in Table 1 (K1 (min−1) is the pseudo-first order constant, K2 (g/mg·min) is the pseudo-second-order constant). We can summarise the results obtained from this table as follows: (i) R2 and S.D. (%) and the value of the pseudo-second-order model were up to 0.998 and <0.683, respectively, but R2 and S.D. (%) and the values of the pseudo-first-order model ranged between 0.03–0.93 and 31.42–29.06, respectively. (ii) At 20 °C, K2 values for dye concentration ≤50 ppm were higher than that at 75 and 100 ppm. (iii) qe(exp) was a better fit with qe(cal) (pseudo-second-order) than qe(cal) (pseudo-first-order), which confirmed that the adsorption process was pseudo-second-order. The above results emphasize the matching of pseudo-second-order model with our experimental data and that it was appropriate for the adsorption process.
The intra-particle diffusion model was plotted in Figure 10(c); the values of the intra-particle diffusion rate constants, Kdif1, Kdif2 and R2 are given in Table 1. The good linearity of the plots indicates that intra-particle diffusion may play an important role in the first stage of adsorption. As the initial concentration of the dye increases, the intra-particle diffusion rate constant (Kdif) increases (Table 1). This may be related to intra-particle diffusivity as well as Kdif being directly related to qe.
It is known that when the plot qt versus t0.5 passes through the origin, the intra-particle diffusion becomes the sole rate-limiting step. But in our study the intra-particle transport is not the rate-limiting step due to the deviation of the straight lines from the origin and so the mechanism comprises simultaneous adsorption and intra-particle diffusion (Figure 10(c)) (El-Harby et al. 2017; Murcia-Salvador et al. 2019). The results obtained indicate that the molecules of RR dye adsorbed quickly onto the sorbent surface at the beginning of the adsorption process, and then intra-particle diffusion slowed down and stabilized.
Figure 10(d) refers to Elovich's kinetic model, which is for chemical adsorption processes. The Elovich constants can be calculated from the slope and intercept of the line obtained by plotting qt vs. ln t (Figure 10(d)) and listed in Table 1. The results obtained show that the R2 values of this kinetic model were rather low; this model was not applicable to RR adsorption by chitosan Schiff base. This means that the adsorption system is closer to physical adsorption (Elham et al. 2019).
It is clear from previous results that the modification of chitosan led to new active basic sites for adsorption besides the decreasing the crystalline size of chitosan Schiff base, as obtained in XRD results. This likely increases the chemical interaction of RR dye with our adsorbent. Secondly, the relation between the RR structure and the surface charge of chitosan Schiff base must be borne in mind. Studying the effect of pH showed that the dye solution at a pH below the zero point charge (pHpzc = 5.9) of the adsorbent made the surface of the sorbent positively charged and able to attract the negatively charged dye from the solution. So, an electrostatic attraction exists between the positively charge surface of the adsorbent and the negative charge of the RR dye (due to the presence of three SO3 groups on each molecule, Figure 1(b)). On the other hand, further poor adsorption was observed in the basic pH range (pH > 7). It may have been due to the deprotonation of functional groups giving rise to electrostatic repulsion with RR dye. The results showed that the modification of chitosan with pyranoquinolinone could improve the adsorbent's efficiency, relying on the chemical adsorption conditions (pH and dye concentration), the properties of the particles (PZC) and the control of adsorbent dose.
Isotherm study
Batch experiments were performed at different dye concentrations varying from 10 to 100 ppm. Samples were taken and analyzed several times until equilibrium was attained. By applying Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich equations (El-Harby et al. 2017; Tran et al. 2017; Ahmed et al. 2019; Fatima-Zahra et al. 2019), the data of Freundlich isotherm were obtained by the plot of log qe versus log Ce as in Figure 11, where qe is the amount of dye adsorbed at equilibrium time (mg/g), and Ce is equilibrium concentration dye in solution (mg/L). Different Freundlich isotherm parameters KF and 1/n were determined by linear regression, and R2 values are listed in Table 2. KF is the Freundlich constant (L/mg) related to the bonding energy and 1/n is the heterogeneity factor. The values of 1/n and KF were 0.945 and 1.96 L/mg, respectively. It is known that the adsorption process is favorable when the value of 1/n is lower than 1 and this was confirmed for chitosan Schiff base (El-Harby et al. 2017). Also, we found that the obtained data fit well with the Freundlich isotherm, yielding a high R2 value (0.982), close to 1.0.
Isotherm . | Parameters . | Isotherm . | Parameters . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Freundlich | 1/n | 0.945 | Dubinin–Radushkevich | qm (mg/g) | 53.51 |
R2 | 0.982 | E (J/mol) | 500 | ||
KF (L/mg) | 1.96 | K | 0.000002 | ||
R2 | 0.8812 | ||||
Langmuir | qm (mg/g) | 344.8 | Temkin | αt | 1.739 |
KL (L/mg) | 1.23 | R2 | 0.9705 | ||
R2 | 0.479 | bt | 86.4 |
Isotherm . | Parameters . | Isotherm . | Parameters . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Freundlich | 1/n | 0.945 | Dubinin–Radushkevich | qm (mg/g) | 53.51 |
R2 | 0.982 | E (J/mol) | 500 | ||
KF (L/mg) | 1.96 | K | 0.000002 | ||
R2 | 0.8812 | ||||
Langmuir | qm (mg/g) | 344.8 | Temkin | αt | 1.739 |
KL (L/mg) | 1.23 | R2 | 0.9705 | ||
R2 | 0.479 | bt | 86.4 |
The straight line of the Langmuir isotherm was obtained by plotting Ce/qe versus Ce (Figure 11), whose parameters qmax (maximum adsorption capacity), and KL (Langmuir constant) were determined from its slope and the intercept, respectively. R2 also was determined and listed in Table 2. The value of R2 is lower than that obtained with the Freundlich isotherm. Previous studies have been carried out using chitosan polymer for the adsorption of different dyes and similar results were obtained (Subramani & Thinakaran 2017; Murcia-Salvador et al. 2019).
By applying the Langmuir equation, the qm value obtained was 344 mg/g. A comparison of the maximum adsorption capacities of RR dye onto chitosan Schiff base in this work was done as shown in Table 3. The results show that the qm of RR dye onto chitosan Schiff base is higher than qm in other studies of anionic dyes with different modified chitosan adsorbents (Demarchi et al. 2015; Salama et al. 2015; Othman et al. 2019).
No. . | Chitosan adsorbent . | Dye . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g), qm . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chitosan polyacrylamide composite hydrogels | Congo red | 2.1 × 10−4 mol g−1 | Salama et al. (2015) |
2 | Terephthaloyl thiourea cross-linked chitosan hydrogels (TTU-chitosan-1) | Congo red | 44.248 | El-Harby et al. (2017) |
3 | Chitosan | Remazol red | 155.72 | Othman et al. (2019) |
4 | Chitosan-liked p-t-butylcalix[4]arene | Remazol yellow FG | 188.31 | Demarchi et al. (2015) |
5 | Chitosan Schiff base | Remazol red | 344.80 | Present study |
6 | GLA cross-linked chitosan | Reactive red | 7.50 | Cestari et al. (2004) |
7 | GLA cross-linked chitosan | Congo red | 24.18 | Feng et al. (2011) |
8 | Terephthaloyl thiourea cross-linked chitosan hydrogels (TTU-chitosan-3) | Congo red | 37.70 | El-Harby et al. (2017) |
9 | Terephthaloyl thiourea cross-linked chitosan (TTU-chitosan-2) | Congo red | 38.70 | El-Harby et al. (2017) |
No. . | Chitosan adsorbent . | Dye . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g), qm . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chitosan polyacrylamide composite hydrogels | Congo red | 2.1 × 10−4 mol g−1 | Salama et al. (2015) |
2 | Terephthaloyl thiourea cross-linked chitosan hydrogels (TTU-chitosan-1) | Congo red | 44.248 | El-Harby et al. (2017) |
3 | Chitosan | Remazol red | 155.72 | Othman et al. (2019) |
4 | Chitosan-liked p-t-butylcalix[4]arene | Remazol yellow FG | 188.31 | Demarchi et al. (2015) |
5 | Chitosan Schiff base | Remazol red | 344.80 | Present study |
6 | GLA cross-linked chitosan | Reactive red | 7.50 | Cestari et al. (2004) |
7 | GLA cross-linked chitosan | Congo red | 24.18 | Feng et al. (2011) |
8 | Terephthaloyl thiourea cross-linked chitosan hydrogels (TTU-chitosan-3) | Congo red | 37.70 | El-Harby et al. (2017) |
9 | Terephthaloyl thiourea cross-linked chitosan (TTU-chitosan-2) | Congo red | 38.70 | El-Harby et al. (2017) |
The Temkin isotherm explains the influences of indirect adsorbate/adsorbate interactions on adsorption isotherms (Fatima-Zahra et al. 2019). The values of αt and bt were determined from the intercept and the slope of the linear plots and given by plotting qe versus lnCe in Figure 11. The resulting parameters αt, bt and R2 are listed in Table 2. The values of R2 and bt for chitosan Schiff base are 0.9705 and 86.4 kJ/mol, respectively. The positive value of bt shows that there are physical as well as chemisorption processes in the adsorption process (Murcia-Salvador et al. 2019).
The Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R) isotherm is compatible between Gaussian energy distribution and adsorption processes on a heterogeneous surface (Ahmed et al. 2019). The value of E is useful to predict the type of sorption reaction. If E is in the range of 8–16 kJ mol−1, the sorption is governed by chemical ion exchange. In the case of E < 8 kJ mol−1, physical forces may affect the sorption. From the results of the D–R model shown in Figure 11 and Table 2, we found that the E magnitude was 500 J mol−1, which indicating that the sorption was governed by physical adsorption (Ahmed et al. 2019).
Adsorption thermodynamics
Temperature (K) . | ΔH (kJ mol−1) . | ΔS (kJ mol−1 K−1) . | ΔG (kJ mol−1) . |
---|---|---|---|
293 | 71.13 | 57.72 | −16.81 |
303 | −17.38 | ||
313 | −17.96 |
Temperature (K) . | ΔH (kJ mol−1) . | ΔS (kJ mol−1 K−1) . | ΔG (kJ mol−1) . |
---|---|---|---|
293 | 71.13 | 57.72 | −16.81 |
303 | −17.38 | ||
313 | −17.96 |
CONCLUSION
The novel adsorbent of modified chitosan bearing pyranoquinolinone moiety was successfully synthesized. In our study, this adsorbent showed the greatest ability to adsorb a textile carcinogenic organic dye from aqueous solution. The maximum adsorption capacity was 344.4 mg/g. Several factors affected the adsorption capacity of this synthesized sample: temperature, pH, initial concentration of the dye solution, dose of adsorbent and contact time with the RR dye. The results obtained showed that chitosan Schiff base achieved a dye uptake percentage of 100% after a period of dye contact time not exceeding 2 min. Pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, intra-particle diffusion, and Elovich adsorption kinetic models along with Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin–Radushkevich adsorption isotherms models were utilized in this study. The sorption process was better fitted to pseudo-second-order equation and the Freundlich model. The mechanism of dye removal from its aqueous solution over chitosan modified with pyranoquinolinone was proposed. In addition, thermodynamic parameters for dye adsorption were calculated.
FUNDING
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.