In this study, a response surface methodology (RSM) approach using central composite design (CCD) was investigated to develop a mathematical model and to optimize the effects of pH, adsorbent amount and temperature related to the hexavalent chromium removal by biosorption on peanut shells (PSh). The highest removal percentage of 30.28% was found by the predicted model under the optimum conditions (pH of 2.11, 0.73 g of PSh and 37.2 °C) for a 100 mg/L initial Cr(VI) concentration, which was very near to the experimental value (29.92%). The PSh was characterized by SEM, EDX, FTIR, BET, XRD analyses. Moreover, a Langmuir isotherm fitted well (R2 = 0.992) with the experimental data, and the maximum adsorption capacity was discovered to be 2.48 and 3.49 mg/g respectively at 25 and 45 °C. Kinetic data were well foreseen by pseudo second order. Thermodynamic study depicted that biosorption of Cr(VI) onto PSh was spontaneous and endothermic. Regeneration of the PSh using NaOH showed a loss <5% in the Cr(VI) removal efficiency up to three recycle runs. In summary, the Cr(VI) removal onto economic, sensitive and selective biosorbent (PSh) was optimized using CCD to study biosorption behaviors.

  • Biosorption has been investigated as a solution for Cr(VI) removal from wastewater.

  • Optimization of Cr(VI) removal on PSh through 3 factors central composite design.

  • The highest removal yield was obtained for a pH of 2.11, adsorbent amount of 0.73 g and temperature of 37.2 °C.

  • The maximum adsorption capacity was 3.5 mg/g. Cr(VI) adsorption followed Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

Wastewater pollution by chromium is of major concern due to the excessive amount generated by various industries using processes that retain a chromium finish treatment, which is destructive to the environment and human health (Jobby et al. 2018). In fact, chromium is the 7th most abundant element on Earth (Ponnusamy & Yashwanthraj 2017), and is dispersed to groundwater and surface water due to its extensive use in various industrial sectors such as metallurgy, tanning industries, painting, ceramics and the production of steel and alloys owing to its various qualities such as hardness, solubility and corrosion resistance (Hamilton et al. 2018). Chromium has different oxidation states, the most stable of which are trivalent chromium Cr(III) and hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) (Mahmoud et al. 2020). Studies have revealed that Cr(VI) is among the 14 most toxic chemicals posing a threat to humans even at ppb concentrations (Pradhan et al. 2017). It can easily penetrate into the body through the skin, digestion, the respiratory tract and mucous membranes (Li et al. 2021). Moreover, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified Cr(VI) compounds as carcinogenic to humans (Moffat et al. 2018). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended a maximum allowed concentration of Cr(VI) to 0.05 and 0.5 mg/L respectively in drinking water and industrial wastewater (Aigbe & Osibote 2020).

Several techniques have been used for the uptake of this pollutant from aqueous systems including precipitation (Sun et al. 2007), electrocoagulation (Hamdan & El-Naas 2014), reverse osmosis (Mnif et al. 2017), ion exchange (Harbi et al. 2016) and adsorption (Jain et al. 2018), but these methods have several disadvantages such as high operational cost, high reagent and energy consumption, low selectivity, higher quantities of sludge generation, and are time consuming and labor-intensive (Iftekhar et al. 2017). Recently, the adsorption process, as an alternative treatments, has attracted intensive attention to find low-cost adsorbents with high chromium removal capacities (Pakade et al. 2019). A large range of adsorbents has been studied, including carbon-based materials, mineral, organic or biological origin, biosorbents, agricultural wastes. The low cost of agricultural wastes sorbents contrasted with conventional adsorbents has inspired researchers to exploit these as competent sorbents for hexavalent chromium ions removal (Mondal et al. 2017). The agricultural products enclose some compounds, including lignin, pectin, cellulose, hemicellulose, which possess effective functional groups with great affinity to Cr(VI) ions (Ali et al. 2016). In addition, they have been used owing to their low cost, renewability, sustainability, rich surface with functional groups and biodegradability (Dai et al. 2018). Several studies have focused on the efficiency of various biosorbents for Cr(VI) removal such as potato peels (Mutongo et al. 2014), peapod (Sharma et al. 2016), rice straw (Gao et al. 2008), barks of Acacia albida (Gebrehawaria et al. 2015), and teff straw (Tadesse et al. 2014). Recently, agricultural waste such as pineapple core (Rosales et al. 2019), tea (Çelebi 2020), sugarcane bagasse (Karri et al. 2020), mango kernel (Akram et al. 2017), Phragmites australis and Ziziphus spin-christi (Mahmoud et al. 2020), fruit peel (Ben Khalifa et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2020) has shown good results in the adsorption of Cr(VI) ions. Nag et al. studied the efficiency of diverse natural biomaterials including mango, jackfruit, bamboo leaves, onion and garlic peel, coconut shell and acid-treated rubber leaf for Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution. Their results showed maximum capacity of 35.7 mg/g for mango leaf and the sequence of adsorption capacity was found to be mango leaf > jackfruit leaf > acid-treated rubber leaf > onion peel > bamboo leaf > garlic peel > coconut shell, in a lower pH solution (Nag et al. 2020). Another study performed by Rambabu et al. showed a Cr(VI) removal efficiency of 58.02% using date palm empty fruit bunch wastes (Rambabu et al. 2020).

Peanut shells (PSh) are low-cost, abundant, inexpensive and available in huge quantities. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 46 million tons of peanut were produced worldwide in September 2019 (Sorita et al. 2020). Approximately, 1 kg of peanut generated about 230–300 g of shells and it has been predicted that 10.7–14.0 million tons of peanut shell waste were generated worldwide in the years 2017 and 2018 (Ge et al. 2020). In addition, the Tunisian Ministry of Agriculture announced that the production of peanuts increased from 5,060 to 6,495 tons from the years 2015 to 2019.

There are many ways and procedures to optimize the adsorption process. The traditional single-variation method is not a reliable method of finding optimal conditions. Currently, response surface methodology with central composite design (RSM-CCD) has been widely used in environmental study modeling and optimization processes (Badr et al. 2020). RSM-CCD is an empirical statistical technique that contributes to development, improvement and optimization processes and can simultaneously resolve the optimum of several variables with the least number of experiments providing an appropriate experimental design (Mondal et al. 2017). Numerous applications of RSM have been successfully conducted to optimize the hexavalent chromium removal using biomaterials (Ben Khalifa et al. 2019; Afshin et al. 2021; Bian et al., 2021; Guo et al. 2021).

To the best of our knowledge, there have been few studies relating to the biosorption of Cr(VI) onto PSh using RSM-CCD. The main novelty of the reported study is to evaluate the biosorption capacity of PSh biomass owing to the diverse functional groups present in it. Additionally, the work intends to expose the performance of CCD to model and optimize hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on PSh, which has not been established until now. Consequently, PSh is considered as a low-cost, effectual and sustainable biosorbent for effective treatment of Cr(VI) ions polluted water.

The aims of this study were to recuperate the PSh wastes and reuse them for Cr(VI) removal from wastewater. The produced biosorption was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) theory, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) and also by using Boehm and pH zero charge methods. The significant variables (pH, adsorbent amount (g), and temperature (°C)) affecting Cr(VI) biosorption were studied and optimized using RSM with CCD according to the desirability function (DF). In addition, adsorption isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamic studies were processed in order to understand the adsorption mechanism. This work also reports recovery of Cr(VI) after the adsorption process, which is necessary for sustainable application of peanut shells in wastewater treatment.

Material

Reagents

A stock solution of hexavalent chromium (1,000 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving 2.828 g of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) of 99% purity obtained from Merck in 1 L distilled water. The complexing agent 1,5-diphenycarbazide (98%) was supplied by Sigma Aldrich. Hydrochloric acid (37%), sulphuric acid (95–98%) and ethanol (95%) were purchased from Acros. Sodium chloride and sodium hydroxide were obtained from Shamlab. All the solutions were prepared with distilled water.

Adsorbent preparation

The peanut shells (PSh) were collected from a local center of preparation of shell-removed peanut in Kelibia, Tunisia. The raw feed stocks were washed three times with tap water to remove all the adhering dirt. Then, they were washed three times with distilled water. The wet material was dried in the oven at 80 °C for 24 hours and was ground using a mortar. The resulting powdered PSh was sieved to obtain a particle size less than 250 μm. Table 1 shows some physical and chemical proprieties of peanut shells powder.

Table 1

Physical and chemical proprieties of peanut shells

ParametersWt %Reference
Moisture 5.54 This study 
Ash content 4.26 
Total carbon 47.54 
Total hydrogen 6.00 
Total nitrogen 3.24 
Total sulfur 2.53 
Total oxygen 41.77 Perea-Moreno et al. (2018)  
Total chlorine 0.07 
Lignin 36.1 Sareena et al. (2014)  
Hemicellulose 5.6 
Cellulose 44.8 
Volatile matter 84.9 Perea-Moreno et al. (2018)  
ParametersWt %Reference
Moisture 5.54 This study 
Ash content 4.26 
Total carbon 47.54 
Total hydrogen 6.00 
Total nitrogen 3.24 
Total sulfur 2.53 
Total oxygen 41.77 Perea-Moreno et al. (2018)  
Total chlorine 0.07 
Lignin 36.1 Sareena et al. (2014)  
Hemicellulose 5.6 
Cellulose 44.8 
Volatile matter 84.9 Perea-Moreno et al. (2018)  

Methods

Characterization of the PSh

In this study, the morphology and structure of PSh were carefully investigated through various measurements. The surface functional groups of PSh were estimated by the Boehm method (Valentín-Reyes et al. 2019). This method is based on the neutralization of oxygenated functions by three bases having different strengths, sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in order to determine the nature and amounts of surface functionalities among carboxylic, phenolic and lactonic groups (Kim et al. 2012). Here, 0.5 g of PSh was added to 50 mL of the three mentioned basis and HCl (0.1 mol/L). After 24 h, the basic functions were titrated with HCl (0.1 mol/L) and the acidic with NaOH (0.1 mol/L).

The pH of zero charge (pHpzc) was determined by mixing 0.15 g of PSh with a solution 0.01 mol/L NaCl. The pH of each sample was adjusted to different values from 2 to 12 (2 units increment) using HCl (1 and 0.1 mol/L) and NaOH (1 and 0.1 mol/L). After 24 h the final pH of solutions was measured and the point of intersection of pHfinal versus pHinitial was noted as pHpzc of PSh. The pHpzc of a material refers to the pH value for which the net charge on the surface of the material is zero (Norouzi et al. 2018).

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of the PSh was conducted by Bruker Vertex 70 model, in a spectral range of 400–4,000 cm−1. The PSh was also characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD model: PANalytical X-ray diffractometer) to identify the surface groups and phase identification. Microstructure and morphology of the native PSh was carried out using Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (SEM) operating at 20 kV. The elemental composition of PSh was determined using an Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) Spectrometer. The surface area and pore size of the biosorbent were determined using nitrogen adsorption isotherms at 77 K recorded with a Micrometrics Surface Area Analyzer (ASAP 2020, Micrometrics Inc, USA) after degassing at 100 °C overnight.

Batch biosorption experiments

The adsorption experiments were performed to study the effect of various operating parameters on adsorption. Batch biosorption of Cr(VI) on PSh was carried out in an Erlenmeyer conical flask with constant time of 45 min and constant agitation speed of 125 rot/min. Adsorption tests were conducted to investigate the effects of solution pH (2.11–9.22), adsorbent amount (0.07–0.73 g) and temperature (12.70–37.20 °C) on the optimization of Cr(VI) adsorption on PSh. Solutions with different concentrations of hexavalent chromium in the range of 10–250 mg/L were prepared from the stock solution (1,000 mg/L). 50 mL of each solution was shaken at the same speed using a shaking water bath ‘OLS 200 Grant’. After filtration, the Cr(VI)concentration in the filtrate was determined by the 1,5-diphenylcarbazide method using a “VWR UV-1600PC” spectrophotometer at 540 nm. The percentage removal of Cr(VI) and the amount of adsorbed Cr(VI) qe (mg/g) were respectively computed using the Equations (1) and (2):
(1)
(2)
where qe (mg/g) refers to the Cr(VI) adsorption capacity, C0 and Ce (mg/L) are, the initial and equilibrium Cr(VI) concentrations respectively. Moreover, V (L) is the solution volume and m (g) is the adsorbent weight.

Statistical design of experiments

Experimental designs grant maximum efficiency using the smallest number of trials and, consequently the minimum cost. It is usually suitable for concurrent optimization of the effect of variables to improve the efficiency attributes and decrease errors with the least possible number of runs (Adio et al. 2017). CCD as a broadly appropriate optimization method allows the approximation of coefficients in a mathematical form and predicts the reaction and the validation of method (de Carvalho et al. 2016). In this study, three factors pH (X1), adsorbent amount (X2) and temperature (X3) were applied for hexavalent chromium removal percentage at five levels utilizing the STATISTICA 10.0 with 20 runs. Table 2 illustrates the experimental design points with the coded values of variables used in the matrix of experiments (−1.68(α), −1, 0, +1, +1.68(α)) having of 2 k axial points, 2k factorial points and six central points. The central points were used to evaluate the data reproducibility and the experimental error. The second order polynomial model can be used to estimate the mathematical relation between the three independent variables by Equation (3) (Melliti et al. 2021):
(3)
where Y refers to the predicted response (the percentage of Cr(VI) removal), while b0 is the constant coefficient, bi shows the linear coefficient, bii represents the quadratic, and bij shows the interactive coefficient. Moreover, Xi and Xj correspond to the independent variables; ɛ and k respectively represent the residual error and the number of the independent variables. The design was arbitrarily performed to reduce the effect of non-controlled variables. Furthermore, this design enables approximating quadratic effects and the main interaction. The RSM was utilized to allow the considerable specification and assessment of the relative factors and resolve multivariate equation to acquire an optimum response. The modeling was conducted by adjusting the first or second order polynomial equations to the experimental reactions. Then, the variance analysis (ANOVA) was investigated to identify the essential effects of the variables and their interactions on the chromium removal process. Plotting tridimensional graph was performed to make the surface response used for predicting the optimum working conditions based on the p-value and F-value.
Table 2

Experimental setup for 5 levels, 3 factors surface response design, the experimental design matrix and responses (RSM) for Cr(VI) biosorption onto PSh

CodeIndependent variablesLevels
− α− 10+ 1+ α
X1 pH 2.11 3.63 5.75 7.88 9.22 
X2 Adsorbent amount (g) 0.07 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.73 
X3 Temperature (°C) 12.75 17.50 25.00 32.50 37.25 
Independent variables
R % Cr(VI)
Run orderX1X2X3ExperimentalPredicted
5.75 0.40 25.00 6.38 6.75  
5.75 0.40 37.20 10.05 10.27  
7.88 0.20 32.50 6.11 4.68  
5.75 0.40 25.00 7.15 6.75  
5.75 0.07 25.00 2.81 3.97  
3.63 0.60 17.50 13.01 14.63  
5.75 0.40 25.00 6.64 6.75  
5.75 0.40 25.00 7.40 6.75  
7.88 0.60 17.50 5.54 5.47  
10 7.88 0.60 32.50 8.22 8.14  
11 5.75 0.40 25.00 6.89 6.75  
12 3.63 0.20 32.50 15.83 16.09  
13 3.63 0.60 32.50 17.41 18.46  
14 9.22 0.40 25.00 4.85 6.48  
15 3.63 0.20 17.50 11.07 11.34  
16 5.75 0.40 12.70 4.70 4.21  
17 7.88 0.20 17.50 1.94 1.08  
18 5.75 0.73 25.00 10.98 9.54  
19 5.75 0.40 25.00 6.13 6.75  
20 2.11 0.40 25.00 26.29 24.56  
CodeIndependent variablesLevels
− α− 10+ 1+ α
X1 pH 2.11 3.63 5.75 7.88 9.22 
X2 Adsorbent amount (g) 0.07 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.73 
X3 Temperature (°C) 12.75 17.50 25.00 32.50 37.25 
Independent variables
R % Cr(VI)
Run orderX1X2X3ExperimentalPredicted
5.75 0.40 25.00 6.38 6.75  
5.75 0.40 37.20 10.05 10.27  
7.88 0.20 32.50 6.11 4.68  
5.75 0.40 25.00 7.15 6.75  
5.75 0.07 25.00 2.81 3.97  
3.63 0.60 17.50 13.01 14.63  
5.75 0.40 25.00 6.64 6.75  
5.75 0.40 25.00 7.40 6.75  
7.88 0.60 17.50 5.54 5.47  
10 7.88 0.60 32.50 8.22 8.14  
11 5.75 0.40 25.00 6.89 6.75  
12 3.63 0.20 32.50 15.83 16.09  
13 3.63 0.60 32.50 17.41 18.46  
14 9.22 0.40 25.00 4.85 6.48  
15 3.63 0.20 17.50 11.07 11.34  
16 5.75 0.40 12.70 4.70 4.21  
17 7.88 0.20 17.50 1.94 1.08  
18 5.75 0.73 25.00 10.98 9.54  
19 5.75 0.40 25.00 6.13 6.75  
20 2.11 0.40 25.00 26.29 24.56  
After the generation of polynomial model (Equation (3)), the DF was found to optimize the Cr(VI) adsorption process. The main advantages of DF are its ability to obtain qualitative and quantitative responses by simple and quick transformation of different responses for one measurement (Asfaram et al. 2015). The experimental response was converted to DF values, it is in the range of 0–1. The 1 indicates the maximum desirability and 0 the minimum desirability. Based on the study of S. Harbi et al., the DF equation can be expressed as follows (Harbi et al. 2016):
(4)
α and β are the lowest and highest obtained values for the response Ui (i = 1, 2, 3…, n) respectively, and wi is the weight. The individual desirability scores for each predicted response are then combined on a single overall DF, which is calculated to find the optimum set of input variables as following:
(5)
where dfi indicates the desirability of the response Ui and vi represents the importance of responses.

Regeneration

Reusability of the biosorbent is a very essential factor that influences the process economics of the biosorption system, precisely towards the operational costs of the process (Bharath et al. 2020). Here, 0.73 g of PSh was treated with 100 mg/L of Cr(VI) solution for 45 min at the optimum conditions (pH (2.11) and temperature (37.2 °C)). Cr(VI) loaded adsorbent was filtered, dried overnight at 80 °C and transferred into a series of flasks containing 0.1 M of sodium hydroxide, 0.1 M of sodium chloride and distilled water. Saturated adsorbent was then agitated at 125 rot/min for 45 min with all desorption solutions. The temperature of 25 °C was chosen for desorption experiments. The regenerated PSh was washed several times with distilled water, dried and applied for more Cr(VI) ions sequestration experiments.

Adsorbent characterization

The intersection of the curve final pH = f (initial pH) with the bisector corresponds to the pHpzc of PSh as shown in Figure 1 was equal to 4.6. Therefore, when the pH of the solution is lower than 4.6, the adsorbent surface is charged positively. By contrast, for pH values above 4.6, the surface is charged negatively (Raza et al. 2015).

Figure 1

pH of zero charge of the PSh.

Figure 1

pH of zero charge of the PSh.

Close modal

The amounts of basic and acidic groups found in PSh are presented in Table 3. Obtained results proved that the adsorbent had more acidic functional groups at the surface. The distribution of the acidic functional groups differs: the carboxylic functions represent 31.03%, the phenolic functions 6.90% and the lactones 62.07%. These results are perfectly consistent with the pH of zero charge found previously (4.6). Omorogie et al. was found to have a quite similar value for Nauclea Diderrichii seed biomass waste equal to 4.9 (Omorogie et al. 2016).

Table 3

Acidic and basic surface groups for PSh

GroupsCarboxylic groupsLactonic groupsPhenolic groupsTotal acidicTotal basic
Amount (mmol/g) 0.9 0.2 1.8 2.9 1.6 
GroupsCarboxylic groupsLactonic groupsPhenolic groupsTotal acidicTotal basic
Amount (mmol/g) 0.9 0.2 1.8 2.9 1.6 

The FTIR spectrum of peanut shells is shown in Figure 2(a). The broad peak at 3,313 cm−1 is an indicator of O–H group suggesting the presence of phenols and alcohols which proves the presence of cellulose and lignin in the PSh sample (Taşar et al. 2014). The peak observed at 2,922 cm−1 was attributed to C–H stretching vibration of lignocellulosic components proving the presence of methyl and methylene groups (Ding et al. 2012). The peak situated at 1,724 cm−1 was ascribable to carbonyl group C = O stretching vibrations of hemicelluloses. The absorbance peak at 1,627 cm−1 is characteristics of aromatic C = O stretching vibrations in associated carbonyl of lignin. The peak around 1,509 cm−1 may be attributed to C = C vibration of an aromatic cycle of lignin (Bayuo et al. 2019). The peak appearing in 1,030 cm−1 indicates the presence of C─O bonds. The phenol (OH), carbonyl (C = O) and carboxylic (COOH) groups are essential sorption sites (Lugo-Lugo et al. 2012). The existence of an –OH group coupled to carbonyl group confirms the presence of carboxylic acid groups in the biomass (Chigondo et al. 2013). The slight shifting of bands after adsorption of Cr(VI) ions is due to a chemical interaction confirming the sorption of PSh to chromium ions from wastewater (Banerjee et al. 2019). Zhao et al. (2020) reported a FTIR spectrum of peanut shells presenting similar bands.

Figure 2

(a) FTIR spectrum of PSh before and after sorption of Cr(VI), (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of PSh, (c) EDX analysis of PSh, (d) N2 adsorption–desorption patterns for PSh.

Figure 2

(a) FTIR spectrum of PSh before and after sorption of Cr(VI), (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of PSh, (c) EDX analysis of PSh, (d) N2 adsorption–desorption patterns for PSh.

Close modal

XRD patterns of the material were determined by XRD using a PANalytical X- ray diffractometer applying CoKα irradiation (λ = 1.79 Å) operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. The scanning scope and scanning speed were 10°–120°. The XRD pattern (Figure 2(b)) of peanut shells showed the typical spectrum of cellulosic material having main and secondary peaks at 2θ of 24° and 16°, respectively. The major peak is an indicator of the presence of highly organized crystalline cellulose, while the minor rather weak peak is an indicator of a less organized polysaccharide structure (Zhu et al. 2009). The intensity of these peaks depends on the amount of cellulose present in the biomaterials (Prithivirajan et al. 2016). The conclusion is accordant with that of the FT-IR analysis.

The SEM micrographs of peanut shells at different magnifications are shown in Figure 3. As presented in Figure 3(a), the surface of PSh is porous, irregular and has different shapes. Inside the peanut shells matrix, great numbers of pores were observed at higher magnification (Figure 3(c)). Various shapes were also observed, for example spiral tubes shapes (Figure 3(b-1)) and cavities (Figure 3(b-2)). These biomasses formed a unique and natural porous arrangement during plant growth. The surface of the PSh after the adsorption of Cr(VI) (Figure 3(d)) was less porous on the PSh surface, indicating successful loading of Cr(VI) molecules on the PSh surface (Jawad et al. 2020a).

Figure 3

SEM images of PSh (a–c) before (d) after adsorption of Cr(VI).

Figure 3

SEM images of PSh (a–c) before (d) after adsorption of Cr(VI).

Close modal

The EDX spectra results and the weight percentages (wt. %) of PSh are given in Figure 2(c). The amounts of C and O loaded on the surface with weight percentages of 68.68% and 30.01% respectively are rather high compared to Na, Mg, Cl and Ca loading. The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of PSh were also obtained and shown in Figure 2(d), The isotherm is type-IV with a broad H3 hysteresis loop as defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification (Thommes et al. 2015), which is characteristic of mesoporous materials. The specific surface areas pore volume and pore size of PSh were calculated to be 0.8126 m2/g, 0.0020 cm3/g and 8.9339 nm, respectively. Taşar et al. studied the removal of lead (II) on peanut shells and a similar surface area of 0.8444 m2/g, and average pore diameter of 20.72 Å were found using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 apparatus. The pore volume was calculated as 0.000471 cm3/g (Taşar et al. 2014).

Preliminary adsorption experiments

Effect of contact time

Contact time was evaluated as one of the most essential factors affecting the biosorption efficiency. Figure 4(a) showed that the Cr(VI) adsorption increased over time until reaching equilibrium after 45 minutes. The fast adsorption in the beginning is due to the availability of a high number of empty sites, and then the saturation is due to the saturation of adsorbent sites. Therefore, the optimum contact time was chosen as 45 min for further experiments. Taşar et al. evaluated the removal of Pb (II) on peanut shells and found the same optimum contact time (Taşar et al. 2014).

Figure 4

(a) Contact time variation, and (b) effect of adsorbent amount. ([Cr(VI)] = 100 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 1 g, pH = 4.6, particle size = 250 μm, T = 25 °C and V = 50 mL).

Figure 4

(a) Contact time variation, and (b) effect of adsorbent amount. ([Cr(VI)] = 100 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 1 g, pH = 4.6, particle size = 250 μm, T = 25 °C and V = 50 mL).

Close modal

Effect of adsorbent amount

The effect of adsorbent amount was studied to obtain an idea about the range to use for the experimental design. It can be seen in Figure 4(b) that the % Cr(VI) removal increased gradually from 4.05 to 22.33% with the increase in the mass of the adsorbent from 0.05 to 0.7 g and remained practically constant at adsorbent quantities higher than 0.7 g. This was due to the increase in the contact area and the number of adsorption sites and thus making easier penetration of Cr(VI) to the adsorption sites. As the quantity of hexavalent chromium ion is stable, an increase in the amount of adsorbent over a quantity that can completely adsorb the available Cr(VI) had no clear effect on further enhancement of percent adsorption.

The statistical experimental design

Statistical analysis and fitting of the model

Response surface methodology was developed by taking into consideration all the significant interactions in the CCD to optimize the critical variables and clarify the response surface nature in the experiment. The results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression coefficients suggest the significant nature of contribution of the quadratic model with a P-value less than 0.05.

In addition, the Lack of Fit (LOF) is the difference of the values around the model fitted to experimental values. LOF is an exacting experiment for adequacy of model fit with no influences of extra higher-order terms. The inefficiency of this model for fitting the data results in a significant value. The P-value of LOF is 4.2 10−5 (Table 4), verifying the fitting applicability of this method for well fitting the response. The validity of the polynomial model was checked by completing the coefficient of determination (R2). The large values of R2 = 0.972 and adjusted R2 = 0.947 indicate that the data predicted by the model correlated well with that found experimentally. Equation (4) was used to estimate the influence of the factors studied on the removal of chromium by adsorption on PSh:
(6)
where X1, X2 and X3 respectively refer to the real values of the independent variables related to pH, adsorbent amount and temperature.
Table 4

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple regression results of the response surface quadratic model for the prediction of Cr(VI) removal onto PSh

SourceSum of squaresDegrees of freedomMean squareF-valueP-value. Prob > F
Model 464.3 154.8 16.16 <0.0001 
X1 359.0 359.0 209.2 <0.0001 
X2 38.4 38.4 22.4 0.0008 
X3 46.0 46.0 26.8 0.0004 
X1X2 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.5694 
X1X3 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.5475 
X2X3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.6284 
X12 133.4 133.4 77.7 <0.0001 
X22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9934 
X32 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6143 
Residual 153.3 16 9.6 – – 
Lack of fit 16.0 3.2 14 0.0057 
Pure error 1.1 0.2 – – 
Cor total 617.6 19 – – – 
SourceSum of squaresDegrees of freedomMean squareF-valueP-value. Prob > F
Model 464.3 154.8 16.16 <0.0001 
X1 359.0 359.0 209.2 <0.0001 
X2 38.4 38.4 22.4 0.0008 
X3 46.0 46.0 26.8 0.0004 
X1X2 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.5694 
X1X3 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.5475 
X2X3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.6284 
X12 133.4 133.4 77.7 <0.0001 
X22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9934 
X32 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6143 
Residual 153.3 16 9.6 – – 
Lack of fit 16.0 3.2 14 0.0057 
Pure error 1.1 0.2 – – 
Cor total 617.6 19 – – – 

A Pareto chart was used mainly to recognize the factors that have the most cumulative effect on the system and thus abandon the less significant factors (Figure 5(a)). The frequency or impact of parameter is indicated by the length of each bar in the diagram. The positive coefficients indicate a desirable effect on the efficiency of Cr(VI) removal, while the negative coefficients for the model indicate an undesirable effect. It can be seen from Figure 5(a) that the pH was the most influencing factor on the removal of chromium followed by the temperature and the adsorbent amount (Mahmoud et al. 2016). The signs of coefficients showed that the adsorbent amount and the temperature had positive effects, while the pH had a negative effect on the chromium removal.

Figure 5

(a) Pareto chart of the main and interaction effects had from the CCD. (b) Correlation between observed and predicted values. (c) Raw residuals versus observed values. (d) Histogram of raw residual.

Figure 5

(a) Pareto chart of the main and interaction effects had from the CCD. (b) Correlation between observed and predicted values. (c) Raw residuals versus observed values. (d) Histogram of raw residual.

Close modal

The adequacy graph of the model (Figure 5(b)) proves that the experimental results (R %) are very close to the values calculated by the model, insuring an accuracy of the model for favorable and real prediction of the results. It is clear that there is no obvious pattern followed in the observed values versus the residuals (Figure 5(c)). Figure 5(d) presents the histogram of raw residual, in which the arbitrary template of the residuals as well, announces the adequacy of the model.

The effects of variables on Cr(VI) adsorption efficiency

To make easy the determination of the interactions between the factors and the identification of the main factors influencing the response, we resorted to the use of 3D surface plots (Fakhri 2014). The factors were taken in our case two by two in each figure while the third variable is maintained at level zero (in coded term). These plots are presented in Figure 6. From these interaction plots, it was noticed that there were very slight curvatures between the factors studied (pH, adsorbent amount and temperature) which affirmed that there were very slight interactions between these factors, as had already been shown by the statistical analysis of Pareto. Figure 6(a) shows the interaction connecting pH and adsorbent amount in the adsorption process of chromium on PSh. As shown, the removal percentage of Cr(VI) sharply increases by decreasing pH (from 10.0 to 2.0). For pH less than 2.5 (Figure 6(a)), the adsorption efficiency was maximum. This can be explained by chromium species distribution and the pH of zero charge (pHPZC) of the biomass. At lower pH (pH < pHPZC), the HCrO4 and Cr2O72− ions are the predominant chromium species and the surface of biosorbent becomes positively charged (Haroon et al. 2016). Therefore, the improvement of the Cr(VI) uptake at lower pH could be due to the electrostatic attraction between the biosorbent surface and the chromium species in solution. By contrast at higher pH(pH > pHPZC), there is an electrostatic repulsion between the CrO42− ions present mainly in the solution and the surface of the adsorbent charged negatively.

Figure 6

Response surface 3D plots estimated for the CCD for Cr(VI) adsorption: (a) Combined effect of pH and adsorbent amount at constant temperature. (b) Combined effect of pH and temperature at constant adsorbent amount. (c) Combined effect of adsorbent amount and temperature at constant pH.

Figure 6

Response surface 3D plots estimated for the CCD for Cr(VI) adsorption: (a) Combined effect of pH and adsorbent amount at constant temperature. (b) Combined effect of pH and temperature at constant adsorbent amount. (c) Combined effect of adsorbent amount and temperature at constant pH.

Close modal

Similarly, Figure 6(c) presents the effect of adsorbent amount and temperature on Cr(VI) removal while pH is constant. A growth in both adsorbent mass and temperature increased the percentage of Cr(VI) removal before the optimum conditions were reached. Indeed, the number of abundant bonding sites on the PSh surface increased when adsorbence was added which caused the improvement of the chromium adsorption efficiency. The removal yield was better for the higher temperatures (Figure 6(b) and 6(c)). This result indicates that the Cr(VI) uptake on PSh is endothermic in nature The increasing in removal yield of Cr(VI) at high temperature can be attributed to the effect of temperature on the internal structure of the PSh, thus facilitation the diffusion of Cr(VI) ions in the PSh interspaces structure (Jawad et al. 2020a). Ben Ali et al. (2017) outlined that the biosorption on pomegranate peels was endothermic. The increase in adsorption efficiency with temperature suggests that active sites at the surface of the adsorbent available for adsorption increased with temperature. This may possibly also lead to some changes in the pore size, which becomes larger, and to a relative increase in the diffusion of the chromium ions due to the solution viscosity decreasing.

Optimum conditions

Maximum adsorption efficiency for Cr(VI) by PSh and the corresponding optimal experimental conditions were determined by the DF (Asfaram et al. 2017) (Figure 7). The profile for predicted values and DF developed by STATISTICA 10.0 software. The measure in the range of 0.0 (unpleasant) to 1.0 (very pleasant) was employed to obtain a global function (D) which must be maximized based on the efficient optimization and selection of the considered variables. As claimed by the results of the CCD design matrix in Table 2, the minimum and maximum Cr(VI) removal respectively are equal to 1.94% and 26.29%. In conformity with these values, DF settings for each removal percentage as dependent factor are shown on the right side of Figure 7. The optimal conditions for chromium removal are a pH equal to 2.11, an adsorbent mass of 0.73 g and temperature of 37.2 °C. The maximum chromium removal percentage obtained from DF is 30.28%.

Figure 7

The profile of desirability functions for R% Cr(VI). Dashed line indicates current values after optimization.

Figure 7

The profile of desirability functions for R% Cr(VI). Dashed line indicates current values after optimization.

Close modal

To verify the results given by the model, the experiment was repeated three times using the optimal conditions given by the software. The results showed an average Cr(VI) adsorption efficiency of 29.49 ± 0.8% which is near to the predicted value as revealed in Figure 7.

Mechanism of the biosorption of Cr(VI) on PSh

The biosorption mechanism of Cr(VI) ions on PSh surface associated perplexing adsorption chemistry with coexistence of several interactions. Generally, four main steps explain the mechanism of the biosorption of Cr(VI) ions at the surface of biosorbents rich in lignocellulose and hemicellulose. These steps are: (1) adsorption coupled reduction, (2) an anionic adsorption, (3) reduction and cationic adsorption and (4) cationic and anionic adsorption (Fan et al. 2017). Based on the PSh characterizations and the biosorption experiments obtained, a possible biosorption mechanism for the Cr(VI) ions removal by PSh could be planned through the adsorption-coupled reduction pathway.

Figure 8 describes the hexavalent chromium biosorption mechanism on the PSh surface. The different surface functionality of PSh which contained various functional groups such as –OH, –NH2, –COO, –COC, C = C (as shown through FTIR analysis) played a main role in the adsorption-coupled reduction mechanism. The mechanism suggested three main steps for the capture of Cr(VI) ions from the bulk phase to the solid phase. Thus, the first step implicated the rapid adsorption of the Cr(VI) ions on these functional sites on the PSh surface by electrostatic attraction, following a surface protonation of PSh sites (Islam et al. 2019). Moreover, surface complexation facilitated the Cr(VI) ions uptake by the PSh sorbent owing to the presence of carboxyl groups. In addition, the adsorbed Cr(VI) ions on the PSh sustained a heterogeneous redox reaction to form Cr(III) ions, as represented by the Equation (7) (Fan et al. 2017):
(7)
Figure 8

Proposed mechanism for Cr(VI) ions biosorption by PSh.

Figure 8

Proposed mechanism for Cr(VI) ions biosorption by PSh.

Close modal

The strongly acidic medium provided an excess of H+ ions for the reduction of chromium from its Cr(VI) nature to the Cr(III) state. Lastly, the reduced Cr(III) was more efficiently attracted to functional sites by electrostatic attractions and surface complexation. The greater affinity of Cr(III) ions for active anionic sites on the surface of the PSh improved the anchoring of chromium ions on the PSh biosorbent (Islam et al. 2019).

Adsorption equilibrium modeling

Adsorption isotherms were employed using four different models in order to elucidate the biosorption performance. Generally, adsorption isotherms including Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin–Radushkevich and Temkin present precious information about adsorption process, surface properties and adsorbent tendency. The adsorption experiments were conducted at four temperatures 283, 298, 308 and 318 K and for chromium concentration in the range of 10–250 mg/L. The Cr(VI) adsorption isotherms on peanut shells provided by the origin Pro version 8 software are represented in Figure 9. The non-linearized equations with the corresponding constants presented in the literature (Surip et al. 2020) are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5

Adsorption isotherm constant parameters and correlation coefficients calculated for the adsorption of Cr(VI) onto PSh (experimental conditions: [Cr(VI)] = 10–250 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 0.73 g, V = 50 mL, pH = 2.11 and contact time = 45 min at 283, 298, 308 and 318 K)

Isotherm modelEquationParametersValue
283 K298 K308 K318 K
Langmuir  KL 10−2(L/mg) 3.119 2.578 2.548 2.486 
qm (mg/g) 1.383 2.478 3.015 3.489 
R2 0.990 0.992 0.991 0.992 
χ2 0.002 0.004 0.007 0.009 
Freundlich  KF (L/mg) 0.197 0.277 0.333 0.368 
nF 2.899 2.583 2.563 2.507 
R2 0.895 0.928 0.965 0.970 
χ2 0.017 0.040 0.027 0.032 
Dubinin- Astakhov  qDA (mg/g) 1.264 2.211 2.659 3.083 
nD 4.444 4.445 4.577 4.502 
E (kJ/mol) 2.130 2.093 2.049 2.083 
R2 0.985 0.970 0.934 0.941 
χ2 0.003 0.021 0.065 0.079 
Temkin  bT (J/mol) 0.323 0.352 0.379 0.396 
KT (L/mg) 8,063.646 4,815.498 4,441.820 4,048.680 
R2 0.973 0.983 0.980 0.974 
χ2 0.004 0,009 0.016 0.027 
qe.exp (mg/g) 1.024 1.811 2.015 2.237 
Isotherm modelEquationParametersValue
283 K298 K308 K318 K
Langmuir  KL 10−2(L/mg) 3.119 2.578 2.548 2.486 
qm (mg/g) 1.383 2.478 3.015 3.489 
R2 0.990 0.992 0.991 0.992 
χ2 0.002 0.004 0.007 0.009 
Freundlich  KF (L/mg) 0.197 0.277 0.333 0.368 
nF 2.899 2.583 2.563 2.507 
R2 0.895 0.928 0.965 0.970 
χ2 0.017 0.040 0.027 0.032 
Dubinin- Astakhov  qDA (mg/g) 1.264 2.211 2.659 3.083 
nD 4.444 4.445 4.577 4.502 
E (kJ/mol) 2.130 2.093 2.049 2.083 
R2 0.985 0.970 0.934 0.941 
χ2 0.003 0.021 0.065 0.079 
Temkin  bT (J/mol) 0.323 0.352 0.379 0.396 
KT (L/mg) 8,063.646 4,815.498 4,441.820 4,048.680 
R2 0.973 0.983 0.980 0.974 
χ2 0.004 0,009 0.016 0.027 
qe.exp (mg/g) 1.024 1.811 2.015 2.237 
Figure 9

Plot of Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Astakhov and Temkin at 283 K (a), 298 K (b), 308 K (c) and 318 K (d) for chromium adsorption onto PSh ([Cr(VI)] = 10–250 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 0.73 g, V = 50 mL, pH = 2.11 and contact time = 45 min).

Figure 9

Plot of Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Astakhov and Temkin at 283 K (a), 298 K (b), 308 K (c) and 318 K (d) for chromium adsorption onto PSh ([Cr(VI)] = 10–250 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 0.73 g, V = 50 mL, pH = 2.11 and contact time = 45 min).

Close modal
Figure 10

Plot of pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order and Elovich model for adsorption of Cr(VI) on PSh ([Cr(VI)] = 100 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 0.73 g, V = 50 mL, pH = 2.11 and contact time = 5–120 min at 25 °C).

Figure 10

Plot of pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order and Elovich model for adsorption of Cr(VI) on PSh ([Cr(VI)] = 100 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 0.73 g, V = 50 mL, pH = 2.11 and contact time = 5–120 min at 25 °C).

Close modal
The chi-square test χ2 is a statistical tool used to distinguish the adopted models, because of the small difference between their regression coefficients was calculated according to the Equation (8) (Appa et al. 2019):
(8)

According to the values of R2 and χ2 in Table 5, the Langmuir model was the model which had the highest values of correlation coefficients R2 which represents an excellent regression; in addition it had the lowest values of the chi-square χ2 at different temperatures. Therefore, the Langmuir model was the most suitable model to describe the bioadsorption phenomenon of hexavalent chromium on PSh. This proved that the biosorption of Cr(VI) on PSh involved monolayer adsorption on the active sites of the material (Khammour et al. 2021).

In order to predict whether the adsorption process is favorable or unfavorable, the separation factor RL was calculated using Equation (9) (Rangabhashiyam et al. 2019):
(9)
were C0 (mg/L) refers to the initial concentration of chromium and KL (L/mg) represent the Langmuir constant.

The RL values allowed a prediction of the shape of the isotherm and the nature of the adsorption process. For a favorable adsorption (Mahmoud 2020), 0 < RL < 1, while RL > 1, RL = 1 and RL = 0 represent an unfavorable monolayer adsorption process, linear (Dim et al. 2021), and irreversible adsorption process, respectively (Ali et al. 2019). According to the calculated results of separation factor in Table 6, it can be seen that the values of RL are between 0 and 1, which proved that the adsorption of chromium on the peanut shells was favorable. In addition, the RL values decreased with the increase of the initial concentration, which showed that the adsorption was favorable for high initial concentrations.

Table 6

Separation factor RL values

Chromium concentration (mg/L)RL
283 K298 K308 K318 K
10 0.762 0.795 0.797 0.801 
25 0.562 0.608 0.611 0.617 
50 0.391 0.437 0.440 0.446 
80 0.286 0.326 0.329 0.335 
100 0.243 0.279 0.282 0.287 
200 0.138 0.162 0.164 0.167 
250 0.114 0.134 0.136 0.139 
Chromium concentration (mg/L)RL
283 K298 K308 K318 K
10 0.762 0.795 0.797 0.801 
25 0.562 0.608 0.611 0.617 
50 0.391 0.437 0.440 0.446 
80 0.286 0.326 0.329 0.335 
100 0.243 0.279 0.282 0.287 
200 0.138 0.162 0.164 0.167 
250 0.114 0.134 0.136 0.139 
The values of the Freundlich constant nF shown in Table 6 decreased with the increase in temperature, which implied a decrease in adsorption intensity. Moreover, the values of 1/nF were less than unity, indicating favorable adsorption of chromium under the conditions studied. The value of the adsorption energy E (kJ/mol) determined by the model D-A can be used to determine the adsorption process nature; it is given as follows by Equation (10):
(10)

Physisorption occurs in the range 1–8 kJ/mol, while for values more than 8 kJ/mol, chemisorption is ruling (Touihri et al. 2021). The values of E in Table 5 indicated the physical adsorption of Cr(VI) on PSh. In addition, the values of the heterogeneity factors nD were higher than 3, which proved the homogenization of the adsorbent sites. Conversely, as seen from Table 5, the adsorption heat bT of the Temkin model increased with the increase in temperature from 283 to 318 K, proving that Cr(VI) adsorption on PSh was endothermic.

The performance of different adsorbents and their maximum Cr(VI) adsorption capacity is presented in Table 7. The Tunisian peanut shells have a relatively high adsorption capacity (3.489 mg/g) compared to other biomasses, confirming the suitability of the suggested use of PSh for the removal of Cr(VI). PSh proved a good adsorption capacity compared to some activated biomasses such as banana peel (Ali & Saeed 2015), barks of Acacia albida (Gebrehawaria et al. 2015) and leaves of Eucleas Chimperi (Gebrehawaria et al. 2015). The present biosorbent was able to remove 30.28 mg/L of Cr(VI) from wastewater, which is a high concentration removal compared to other biomasses.

Table 7

Comparison of maximum adsorption capacity of various adsorbents for Cr(VI) adsorption

BiosorbentTime (min)pHDosage (g/L ga)T (°C)[Cr(VI)] mg/Lqmax (mg/g)Removal efficiency (%)References
Teff straw 60 0.6a 25 3.51 79.9 Tadesse et al. (2014)  
Erythrina variegata var, orientalis 180 2.85 50 30 90 1.92 99.1 Aditya et al. (2012)  
Potatoes peel 48 2.5 25 40 3.28 93.31 Mutongo et al. (2014)  
Modified banana peel 60 25 400 3.35 96 Ali & Saeed (2015)  
Pea pod 60 10 28 30 4.33 90 Sharma et al. (2016)  
Orange peel 300 22.4 34.17 10 7.14 97 Ben Khalifa et al. (2019)  
Modified barks of Acacia albida 60 20 25 10 2.98 93.56 Gebrehawaria et al. (2015)  
Modified leaves of Euclea schimperi 60 20 25 10 3.95 93.92 Gebrehawaria et al. (2015)  
Pineapple core 1,440 30 30 50 8.8 92.39 Rosales et al. (2019)  
Rice straw 2,880 10 45 100 5.09 Gao et al. (2008)  
Phaseolus vulgaris husk 180 1.16 20 10 2.98 99.88 Srivastava et al. (2016)  
Peanut shell 45 14.6 37.20 100 3.49 30.28 This worka 
BiosorbentTime (min)pHDosage (g/L ga)T (°C)[Cr(VI)] mg/Lqmax (mg/g)Removal efficiency (%)References
Teff straw 60 0.6a 25 3.51 79.9 Tadesse et al. (2014)  
Erythrina variegata var, orientalis 180 2.85 50 30 90 1.92 99.1 Aditya et al. (2012)  
Potatoes peel 48 2.5 25 40 3.28 93.31 Mutongo et al. (2014)  
Modified banana peel 60 25 400 3.35 96 Ali & Saeed (2015)  
Pea pod 60 10 28 30 4.33 90 Sharma et al. (2016)  
Orange peel 300 22.4 34.17 10 7.14 97 Ben Khalifa et al. (2019)  
Modified barks of Acacia albida 60 20 25 10 2.98 93.56 Gebrehawaria et al. (2015)  
Modified leaves of Euclea schimperi 60 20 25 10 3.95 93.92 Gebrehawaria et al. (2015)  
Pineapple core 1,440 30 30 50 8.8 92.39 Rosales et al. (2019)  
Rice straw 2,880 10 45 100 5.09 Gao et al. (2008)  
Phaseolus vulgaris husk 180 1.16 20 10 2.98 99.88 Srivastava et al. (2016)  
Peanut shell 45 14.6 37.20 100 3.49 30.28 This worka 

aExperimental conditions: [Cr(VI)] = 10–250 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 0.73 g, V = 50 mL, pH = 2.11 and contact time = 45 min at 318 K.

Many connections for binding Cr(VI) to the surface of PSh might be explained by one or more of these bonds as follows: (I) electrostatic interaction of the chromium metal with charged surfaces on the PSh, (II) surface area, total pore volume and pore size obtained by such kind of biomass, and active sites including and –OH and –COOH groups in PSh play an important role in chromium removal process.

Adsorption kinetics modeling

The kinetic experiments of Cr(VI) removal were analyzed using the non-linear form of the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order and Elovich models (Huynh et al. 2020; Mohammed et al. 2020). The kinetics of PSh data obtained from the experiments of concentration of 100 mg/Lat various contact times, and optimum conditions obtained previously along with the equations and constants are shown in Table 8. In addition the non-linear plots of the three models are illustrated in Figure 10.

Table 8

Kinetic parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption onto PSh (experimental conditions: [Cr(VI)] = 100 mg/L, adsorbent amount = 0.73 g, V = 50 mL, pH = 2.11, and contact time = 5–120 min at 25 °C)

Kinetic modelEquationParametersValues
Pseudo-first-order  qe (mg/g) 1.874 
K1 (min−10.058 
R2 0.927 
χ2 0.015 
Pseudo-second-order  qe (mg/g) 1.986 
K2 (g/mg min) 0.117 
R2 0.976 
χ2 0.005 
Elovich model  α (mg/g min) 16.244 
β (g/mg) 4.769 
R2 0.919 
χ2 0.016 
qe,exp 1.991 
Kinetic modelEquationParametersValues
Pseudo-first-order  qe (mg/g) 1.874 
K1 (min−10.058 
R2 0.927 
χ2 0.015 
Pseudo-second-order  qe (mg/g) 1.986 
K2 (g/mg min) 0.117 
R2 0.976 
χ2 0.005 
Elovich model  α (mg/g min) 16.244 
β (g/mg) 4.769 
R2 0.919 
χ2 0.016 
qe,exp 1.991 

As shown in Table 8, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model has the lowest chi-square value χ2 and the highest correlation coefficient R2 compared with the other models (first order and Elovich). So the pseudo-second-order model indicated excellent applicability for describing the chromium (VI) adsorption process on peanut shells. In addition, the values of the calculated qe from the pseudo-second-order model was close to the values of the experimental qe,exp suggesting that the Cr(VI) adsorption may be due to electrostatic attraction between the positively charged group on the adsorbent surface and negatively charged CrO42− group of the chromium at low pH (Jawad et al. 2020b). Thus, electrostatic attraction plays an important role in Cr(VI) biosorption by PSh. Yi et al. (2017) proved that the adsorption of chromium on litchi peels follows the pseudo second order.

Adsorption thermodynamic study

The thermodynamic parameters were calculated using Equations (11)–(13):
(11)
(12)
(13)
where is Gibbs free energy (kJ/mol), is the standard entropy (J/mol K), is the standard enthalpy (kJ /mol), Kc is the thermodynamic equilibrium constant (L/g), R the universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol K), T is temperature (K), Ca and Ce are respectively the equilibrium concentrations of metal ions on the adsorbent (mg/g) and the equilibrium concentrations of metal ions in the solution (mg/L). The curve relating Ln (Kc) to 1/T (Figure 11) allows the resolve of the thermodynamic parameters presented in Table 9.
Table 9

Thermodynamic parameters

Temperature (K)Ln (Kc) (kJ/mol) (kJ/mol) (J/molK)
298 −1.031 2.554 11.749 30.839 
308 −0.883 2.262 
318 −0.732 1.937 
Temperature (K)Ln (Kc) (kJ/mol) (kJ/mol) (J/molK)
298 −1.031 2.554 11.749 30.839 
308 −0.883 2.262 
318 −0.732 1.937 
Figure 11

Curve Ln (Kc) versus 1/T.

Figure 11

Curve Ln (Kc) versus 1/T.

Close modal

The decrease in ΔGo values with an increase in temperature proves that better biosorption occurred at high temperatures (Aditya et al. 2012). Moreover, the positive value of ΔHo proved that the adsorption process was endothermic (Iftekhar et al. 2017). This conclusion is in agreement with the results proving the increase in Cr(VI) removal yield with temperature. In addition, the positive value of ΔS indicated an increase in the disorder between the solid and solution interface during the adsorption process. Hlihor et al. (2017) have found similar results saying that the adsorption of Cr(VI) on dead and living Arthrobacter viscosus biomass is endothermic due to the positive value of ΔHo. A positive value of ΔS reflects the affinity of biomass towards chromium ions in aqueous solution.

PSh reusability and Cr(VI) recovery

Desorption is required to manage the biosorbent waste to avoid the generation of secondary waste and recovery of valuable materials. As low pH (pH = 2.0) was favorable for Cr(VI) uptake, recovery of consumed PSh was performed using 0.1 M NaOH solvent as a basic desorbent, 0.1 M NaCl and deionized water as a neutral desorbents. Figure 12 shows the outcomes of the PSh biosorbent reusability. From the different regenerants studied, it was detected that NaOH provided the best regenerability outcomes for the PSh biosorbent as shown in Figure 12. The biosorbent suffered a friendly loss of <5% in chromium ions recovery efficiency up to 3 recycle runs when washed with NaOH solvent. Desorption of Cr(VI) from the PSh biosorbent surface at strong basic pH environment can occur due to the exchange of CrO42− (the dominant species of Cr(VI) in alkaline solution) with hydroxyl ions (Ye et al. 2019). Daneshvar et al. found similar results studying Cr(VI) desorption by NaOH solution at pH 12 (Daneshvar et al. 2019). They assured that attacking adsorption sites by OH ions led to Cr(VI) desorption. In another work, the maximum desorption efficiency of Cr(VI) was noted as 98.45% by 0.8 M NaOH solution (Akram et al. 2017). They explained that by electrostatic repulsion, due to negatively charged sites of sorbent, this increases Cr(VI) desorption from the adsorbent.

Figure 12

Regeneration studies of the PSh biosorbent.

Figure 12

Regeneration studies of the PSh biosorbent.

Close modal

To make the desorption process more environmental friendly, desorption of Cr(VI) efficiency was also investigated using NaCl and deionized water. However, the loss in Cr(VI) removal efficiency by the regenerated biosorbent was >5% after the first recycle run.. In agreement with our results, Cheng et al. found extremely low Cr(VI) efficiency desorption using deionized water (>3%) and high desorption efficiency (<84%) using NaOH solution (Cheng et al. 2011). They concluded that desorption of Cr(VI) by chemical adsorption and ion exchange mechanisms is more efficient than desorption during washing by deionized water.

Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution is a worldwide environmental concern. Studies have used diverse processes to attain a Cr(VI) free environment or achieve the stringent guidelines of governmental rules. In this study, an RSM-CCD was used to develop a mathematical model and optimize process conditions (pH, adsorbent amount and temperature) for Cr(VI) removal from wastewater by biosorption on PSh with a less number of experiments. The value of the adjusted coefficient of determination R2 = 0.972 showed that the % removal of Cr(VI) predicted by the model was correlated with that found experimentally. ANOVA study showed the significance of generated models and depicted that pH has the most significant effect on response which had a substantial effect on the removal efficiency of Cr(VI). Temperature and adsorbent amount have comparatively less significant effects on the response of Cr(VI) removal yield. The optimal parameters to remove Cr(VI) from aqueous solution at constant short time of 45 min and constant initial Cr(VI) concentration of 100 mg/L using PSh were found to be pH 2.11, biosorbent amount 0.73 g and temperature of 37.2 °C. Under these conditions maximum chromium removal (29.49%) was achieved, which was rather near to the predicted value (30.28%) obtained from RSM model.

Peanut shells were characterized by SEM, EDX, FTIR, BET, XRD, Boehm method and pH zero charge analyses. The isotherm and kinetic data were described by Langmuir and the pseudo-second-order models, while maximum adsorption capacity attributed to Langmuir model was 3.49 mg/g for 0.73 g PSh at 318 K. This biosorbent was an efficient material despite its low specific area. The thermodynamic analysis also demonstrated that the biosorption process was endothermic as did the positive heat of enthalpy ΔHo, accompanied by a positive value of entropy change ΔSo. The PSh waste biomass proved good regeneration potential, precisely with NaOH washing, up to three successive biosorption runs. The results of this study proved that the reported material is efficient to remove 30.28% from 100 mg/L of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. The material has advantages such as shortest sorption time, was easy to use, economic, sensitive and selective for the removal of hexavalent chromium from wastewater samples.

The authors are thankful for the financial support received from Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar. Department of Separation Science, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT) of Finland for hospitality received and for providing necessary instruments for the characterization of the material.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Adio
S. O.
Omar
M. H.
Asif
M.
Saleh
T. A.
2017
Arsenic and selenium removal from water using biosynthesized nanoscale zero-valent iron: a factorial design analysis
.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
107
,
518
527
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.03.004
.
Aditya
G. V. V.
Pujitha
B. P.
Babu
N. C.
Venkateswarlu
P.
2012
Biosorption of chromium onto Erythrina variegata orientalis leaf powder
.
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
29
(
1
),
64
71
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0139-9
.
Afshin
S.
Rashtbari
Y.
Vosough
M.
Dargahi
A.
Fazlzadeh
M.
Behzad
A.
Yousefi
M.
2021
Application of Box-Behnken design for optimizing parameters of hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4 loaded on activated carbon prepared from alga: kinetics and equilibrium study
.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
42
,
102113
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102113
.
Aigbe
U. O.
Osibote
O. A.
2020
A review of hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions by sorption technique using nanomaterials
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
8
(
6
),
104503
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104503
.
Akram
M.
Bhatti
H. N.
Iqbal
M.
Noreen
S.
Sadaf
S.
2017
Biocomposite efficiency for Cr(VI) adsorption: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamics studies
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
5
(
1
),
400
411
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.002
.
Ali
A.
Saeed
K.
2015
Decontamination of Cr(VI) and Mn(II) from aqueous media by untreated and chemically treated banana peel: a comparative study
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
53
(
13
),
3586
3591
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.876669
.
Ali
A.
Saeed
K.
Mabood
F.
2016
Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous medium using chemically modified banana peels as efficient low-cost adsorbent
.
Alexandria Engineering Journal
55
(
3
),
2933
2942
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.05.011
.
Ali
I.
Alharbi
O. M. L.
ALOthman
Z. A.
Al-Mohaimeed
A. M.
Alwarthan
A.
2019
Modeling of fenuron pesticide adsorption on CNTs for mechanistic insight and removal in water
.
Environmental Research
170
,
389
397
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.066
.
Appa
R.
Mhaisalkar
V. A.
Naoghare
P. K.
Lataye
D. H.
2019
Adsorption of an emerging contaminant (primidone) onto activated carbon: kinetic, equilibrium, thermodynamic, and optimization studies
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
191
(
4
),
215
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7302-x
.
Asfaram
A.
Ghaedi
M.
Hajati
S.
Goudarzi
A.
Bazrafshan
A. A.
2015
Simultaneous ultrasound-assisted ternary adsorption of dyes onto copper-doped zinc sulfide nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: Optimization by response surface methodology
.
Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
145
,
203
212
.
Badr
N. B. E.
Al-Qahtani
K. M.
Mahmoud
A. E. D.
2020
Factorial experimental design for optimizing selenium sorption on cyperus laevigatus biomass and Green-synthesized nano-silver
.
Alexandria Engineering Journal
59
(
6
),
5219
5229
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.051
.
Banerjee
M.
Basu
R.
Das
S.
2019
Cu(II) removal using green adsorbents: kinetic modeling and plant scale-up design
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
26
,
1
15
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1930-5
.
Bayuo
J.
Pelig-Ba
K. B.
Abukari
M. A.
2019
Adsorptive removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution unto groundnut shell
.
Applied Water Science
9
(
4
),
107
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-0987-8
.
Ben-Ali
S.
Jaouali
I.
Souissi-Najar
S.
Ouederni
A.
2017
Characterization and adsorption capacity of raw pomegranate peel biosorbent for copper removal
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
142
,
3809
3821
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.081
.
Ben Khalifa
E.
Rzig
B.
Chakroun
R.
Nouagui
H.
Hamrouni
B.
2019
Application of response surface methodology for chromium removal by adsorption on low-cost biosorbent
.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
189
,
18
26
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.03.014
.
Bharath
G.
Rambabu
K.
Hai
A.
Anwer
S.
Banat
F.
Ponpandian
N.
2020
Synthesis of one-dimensional magnetite hydroxyapatite nanorods on reduced graphene oxide sheets for selective separation and controlled delivery of hemoglobin
.
Applied Surface Science
501
,
144215
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144215
.
Bian
H.
Wan
J.
Muhammad
T.
Wang
G.
Sang
L.
Jiang
L.
Wang
H.
Zhang
Y.
Peng
C.
Zhang
W.
Cao
X.
Lou
Z.
2021
Computational study and optimization experiment of nZVI modified by anionic and cationic polymer for Cr(VI) stabilization in soil: kinetics and response surface methodology (RSM)
.
Environmental Pollution
276
,
116745
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116745
.
Çelebi
H.
2020
Recovery of detox tea wastes: usage as a lignocellulosic adsorbent in Cr6+ adsorption
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
8
(
5
),
104310
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104310
.
Cheng
Q.
Li
C.
Xu
L.
Li
J.
Zhai
M.
2011
Adsorption of Cr(VI) ions using the amphiphilic gels based on 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate modified with 1-bromoalkanes
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
173
(
1
),
42
48
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.033
.
Chigondo
F.
Nyamunda
B. C.
Sithole
S. C.
Gwatidzo
L.
2013
Removal of lead (II) and copper (II) ions from aqueous solution by baobab (Adononsia digitata) fruit shells biomass
.
IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry
5
(
1
),
43
50
.
Dai
Y.
Sun
Q.
Wang
W.
Lu
L.
Liu
M.
Li
J.
Yang
S.
Sun
Y.
Zhang
K.
Xu
J.
Zheng
W.
Hu
Z.
Yang
Y.
Gao
Y.
Chen
Y.
Zhang
X.
Gao
F.
Zhang
Y.
2018
Utilizations of agricultural waste as adsorbent for the removal of contaminants: a review
.
Chemosphere
211
,
235
253
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.179
.
Daneshvar
E.
Zarrinmehr
M. J.
Kousha
M.
Hashtjin
A. M.
Saratale
G. D.
Maiti
A.
Vithanage
M.
Bhatnagar
A.
2019
Hexavalent chromium removal from water by microalgal-based materials: adsorption, desorption and recovery studies
.
Bioresource Technology
293
,
122064
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122064
.
Dim
P. E.
Mustapha
L. S.
Termtanun
M.
Okafor
J. O.
2021
Adsorption of chromium (VI) and iron (III) ions onto acid-modified kaolinite: Isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamics studies
.
Arabian Journal of Chemistry
14
(
4
),
103064
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103064
.
Fakhri
A.
2014
Application of response surface methodology to optimize the process variables for fluoride ion removal using maghemite nanoparticles
.
Journal of Saudi Chemical Society
18
(
4
),
340
347
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2013.10.010
.
Fan
S.
Wang
Y.
Li
Y.
Tang
J.
Wang
Z.
Tang
J.
Li
X.
Hu
K.
2017
Facile synthesis of tea waste/Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite for hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution
.
RSC Advances
7
(
13
),
7576
7590
.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA27781 K
.
Gao
H.
Liu
Y.
Zeng
G.
Xu
W.
Li
T.
Xia
W.
2008
Characterization of Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solutions by a surplus agricultural waste – rice straw
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
150
(
2
),
446
452
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.126
.
Ge
S.
Wu
Y.
Peng
W.
Xia
C.
Mei
C.
Cai
L.
Shi
S. Q.
Sonne
C.
Lam
S. S.
Tsang
Y. F.
2020
High-pressure CO2 hydrothermal pretreatment of peanut shells for enzymatic hydrolysis conversion into glucose
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
385
,
123949
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123949
.
Gebrehawaria
G.
Hussen
A.
Rao
V. M.
2015
Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions using barks of Acacia albida and leaves of Euclea schimperi
.
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
12
(
5
),
1569
1580
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0530-2
.
Guo
C.
Ding
L.
Jin
X.
Zhang
H.
Zhang
D.
2021
Application of response surface methodology to optimize chromium (VI) removal from aqueous solution by cassava sludge-based activated carbon
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
9
(
1
),
104785
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104785
.
Hamdan
S. S.
El-Naas
M. H.
2014
Characterization of the removal of chromium(VI) from groundwater by electrocoagulation
.
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
20
(
5
),
2775
2781
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.006
.
Hamilton
E. M.
Young
S. D.
Bailey
E. H.
Watts
M. J.
2018
Chromium speciation in foodstuffs: a review
.
Food Chemistry
250
,
105
112
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.016
.
Harbi
S.
Guesmi
F.
Tabassi
D.
Hannachi
C.
Hamrouni
B.
2016
Application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network: modeling and optimization of Cr(VI) adsorption process using Dowex 1X8 anion exchange resin
.
Water Science and Technology
73
(
10
),
2402
2412
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.091
.
Haroon
H.
Ashfaq
T.
Gardazi
S. M. H.
Sherazi
T. A.
Ali
M.
Rashid
N.
Bilal
M.
2016
Equilibrium kinetic and thermodynamic studies of Cr(VI) adsorption onto a novel adsorbent of Eucalyptus camaldulensis waste: batch and column reactors
.
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
33
(
10
),
2898
2907
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0160-0
.
Hlihor
R. M.
Figueiredo
H.
Tavares
T.
Gavrilescu
M.
2017
Biosorption potential of dead and living Arthrobacter viscosus biomass in the removal of Cr(VI): batch and column studies
.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
108
,
44
56
.
Huynh
P.-T.
Nguyen
N.-T.
Van
H. N.
Nguyen
P.-T.
Nguyen
T. D.
Dinh
V.-P.
2020
Modeling and optimization of biosorption of lead (II) ions from aqueous solution onto pine leaves (Pinus kesiya) using response surface methodology
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
173
,
383
393
.
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.24807
.
Iftekhar
S.
Srivastava
V.
Sillanpää
M.
2017
Enrichment of lanthanides in aqueous system by cellulose based silica nanocomposite
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
320
,
151
159
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.051
.
Islam
M. A.
Angove
M. J.
Morton
D. W.
2019
Recent innovative research on chromium (VI) adsorption mechanism
.
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management
12
,
100267
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100267
.
Jain
M.
Yadav
M.
Kohout
T.
Lahtinen
M.
Garg
V. K.
Sillanpää
M.
2018
Development of iron oxide/activated carbon nanoparticle composite for the removal of Cr(VI), Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution
.
Water Resources and Industry
20
,
54
74
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2018.10.001
.
Jawad
A. H.
Abdulhameed
A. S.
Reghioua
A.
Yaseen
Z. M.
2020a
Zwitterion composite chitosan-epichlorohydrin/zeolite for adsorption of methylene blue and reactive red 120 dyes
.
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
163
,
756
765
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.014
.
Jawad
A. H.
Mubarak
N. S. A.
Abdulhameed
A. S.
2020b
Tunable Schiff's base-cross-linked chitosan composite for the removal of reactive red 120 dye: adsorption and mechanism study
.
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
142
,
732
741
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.014
.
Jobby
R.
Jha
P.
Yadav
A. K.
Desai
N.
2018
Biosorption and biotransformation of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]: a comprehensive review
.
Chemosphere
207
,
255
266
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.050
.
Karri
R. R.
Sahu
J. N.
Meikap
B. C.
2020
Improving efficacy of Cr(VI) adsorption process on sustainable adsorbent derived from waste biomass (sugarcane bagasse) with help of ant colony optimization
.
Industrial Crops and Products
143
,
111927
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111927
.
Khammour
F.
Abdoul-Latif
F. M.
Ainane
A.
Mohamed
J.
Ainane
T.
2021
Eco-friendly adsorbent from waste of mint: application for the removal of hexavalent chromium
.
Journal of Chemistry
2021
,
e8848964
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8848964
.
Kim
Y. S.
Yang
S. J.
Lim
H. J.
Kim
T.
Park
C. R.
2012
A simple method for determining the neutralization point in Boehm titration regardless of the CO2 effect
.
Carbon
50
(
9
),
3315
3323
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.030
.
Li
Y.-X.
Han
Y.-C.
Wang
C.-C.
2021
Fabrication strategies and Cr(VI) elimination activities of the MOF-derivatives and their composites
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
405
,
126648
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126648
.
Lugo-Lugo
V.
Barrera-Díaz
C.
Ureña-Núñez
F.
Bilyeu
B.
Linares-Hernández
I.
2012
Biosorption of Cr (III) and Fe (III) in single and binary systems onto pretreated orange peel
.
Journal of Environmental Management
112
,
120
127
.
Mahmoud
A. E. D.
2020
Graphene-based nanomaterials for the removal of organic pollutants: insights into linear versus nonlinear mathematical models
.
Journal of Environmental Management
270
,
110911
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110911
.
Mahmoud
A. E. D.
Fawzy
M.
Radwan
A.
2016
Optimization of cadmium (CD2+) removal from aqueous solutions by novel biosorbent
.
International Journal of Phytoremediation
18
(
6
),
619
625
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1086305
.
Mahmoud
A. E. D.
Fawzy
M.
Hosny
G.
Obaid
A.
2020
Equilibrium, kinetic, and diffusion models of chromium(VI) removal using Phragmites australis and Ziziphus spina-christi biomass
.
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02968-7.
Melliti
A.
Srivastava
V.
Kheriji
J.
Sillanpää
M.
Hamrouni
B.
2021
Date palm fiber as a novel precursor for porous activated carbon: optimization, characterization and its application as tylosin antibiotic scavenger from aqueous solution
.
Surfaces and Interfaces
24
,
101047
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101047
.
Mnif
A.
Bejaoui
I.
Mouelhi
M.
Hamrouni
B.
2017
Hexavalent chromium removal from model water and car shock absorber factory effluent by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane
.
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
2017
,
1
10
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7415708
.
Moffat
I.
Martinova
N.
Seidel
C.
Thompson
C. M.
2018
Hexavalent chromium in drinking water
.
Journal – American Water Works Association
110
(
5
),
E22
E35
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/awwa.1044
.
Mohammed
I. A.
Jawad
A. H.
Abdulhameed
A. S.
Mastuli
M. S.
2020
Physicochemical modification of chitosan with fly ash and tripolyphosphate for removal of reactive red 120 dye: statistical optimization and mechanism study
.
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
161
,
503
513
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.069
.
Mondal
N. K.
Samanta
A.
Dutta
S.
Chattoraj
S.
2017
Optimization of Cr(VI) biosorption onto Aspergillus niger using 3-level Box-Behnken design: equilibrium, kinetic, thermodynamic and regeneration studies
.
Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology
15
(
1
),
151
160
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.01.006
.
Mutongo
F.
Kuipa
O.
Kuipa
P. K.
2014
Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using powder of potato peelings as a low cost sorbent
.
Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
2014
,
1
7
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/973153
.
Nag
S.
Bar
N.
Das
S. K.
2020
Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution using green adsorbents in continuous bed column – statistical and GA-ANN hybrid modelling
.
Chemical Engineering Science
226
,
115904
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115904
.
Norouzi
S.
Heidari
M.
Alipour
V.
Rahmanian
O.
Fazlzadeh
M.
Mohammadi-moghadam
F.
Nourmoradi
H.
Goudarzi
B.
Dindarloo
K.
2018
Preparation, characterization and Cr(VI) adsorption evaluation of NaOH-activated carbon produced from Date Press Cake; an agro-industrial waste
.
Bioresource Technology
258
,
48
56
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.106
.
Omorogie
M. O.
Babalola
J. O.
Unuabonah
E. I.
Song
W.
Gong
J. R.
2016
Efficient chromium abstraction from aqueous solution using a low-cost biosorbent: Nauclea diderrichii seed biomass waste
.
Journal of Saudi Chemical Society
20
(
1
),
49
57
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2012.09.017
.
Pakade
V. E.
Tavengwa
N. T.
Madikizela
L. M.
2019
Recent advances in hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions by adsorptive methods
.
RSC Advances
9
(
45
),
26142
26164
.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA05188 K
.
Perea-Moreno
M.-Á.
Manzano-Agugliaro
F.
Hernández- Escobedo
Q.
Perea
A.
2018
Peanut shell for energy: properties and its potential to respect the environment
.
Sustainability
10
,
3254
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093254
.
Ponnusamy
S. K.
Yashwanthraj
M.
2017
Sequestration of toxic Cr(VI) ions from industrial wastewater using waste biomass: a review
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
68
,
245
266
.
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20322
.
Pradhan
D.
Sukla
L. B.
Sawyer
M.
Rahman
P. K. S. M.
2017
Recent bioreduction of hexavalent chromium in wastewater treatment: a review
.
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
55
,
1
20
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.040
.
Prithivirajan
R.
Jayabal
S.
Sundaram
S. K.
Sangeetha
V.
2016
Hybrid biocomposites from agricultural residues: mechanical, water absorption and tribological behaviors
.
Journal of Polymer Engineering
36
(
7
),
663
671
.
https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0113
.
Rambabu
K.
Bharath
G.
Banat
F.
Show
P. L.
2020
Biosorption performance of date palm empty fruit bunch wastes for toxic hexavalent chromium removal
.
Environmental Research
187
,
109694
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109694
.
Rangabhashiyam
S.
Sayantani
S.
Balasubramanian
P.
2019
Assessment of hexavalent chromium biosorption using biodiesel extracted seeds of Jatropha sp., Ricinus sp. and Pongamia sp.
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
16
(
10
),
5707
5724
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1951-0
.
Raza
M. H.
Sadiq
A.
Farooq
U.
Athar
M.
Hussain
T.
Mujahid
A.
Salman
M.
2015
Phragmites karka as a biosorbent for the removal of mercury metal ions from aqueous solution: effect of modification
.
Journal of Chemistry
2015
,
1
12
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/293054
.
Rosales
E.
Escudero
S.
Pazos
M.
Sanromán
M. A.
2019
Sustainable removal of Cr(VI) by lime peel and pineapple core wastes
.
Applied Sciences
9
(
10
),
1967
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app9101967
.
Sareena
C.
Sreejith
M. P.
Ramesan
M. T.
Purushothaman
E.
2014
Biodegradation behaviour of natural rubber composites reinforced with natural resource fillers – monitoring by soil burial test
.
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
33
,
416
433
.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684413515954
.
Sharma
P. K.
Ayub
S.
Tripathi
C. N.
2016
Isotherms describing physical adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using various agricultural wastes as adsorbents
.
Cogent Engineering
3
(
1
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1186857
Sorita
G. D.
Leimann
F. V.
Salvador Ferreira
S. R.
2020
Biorefinery approach: is it an upgrade opportunity for peanut by-products?
Trends in Food Science & Technology
S0924224420305689
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.011
.
Srivastava
S.
Agrawal
S. B.
Mondal
M. K.
2016
Characterization, isotherm and kinetic study of Phaseolus vulgaris husk as an innovative adsorbent for Cr(VI) removal
.
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
33
(
2
),
567
575
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0165-0
.
Sun
J.
Chang
S.
Li
R.
Huang
J.
2007
Factors affecting co-removal of chromium through copper precipitation
.
Separation and Purification Technology
56
(
1
),
57
62
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.01.013
.
Surip
S. N.
Abdulhameed
A. S.
Garba
Z. N.
Syed-Hassan
S. S. A.
Ismail
K.
Jawad
A. H.
2020
H2SO4-treated Malaysian low rank coal for methylene blue dye decolourization and cod reduction: optimization of adsorption and mechanism study
.
Surfaces and Interfaces
21
,
100641
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100641
.
Tadesse
B.
Teju
E.
Megersa
N.
2014
The Teff straw: a novel low-cost adsorbent for quantitative removal of Cr(VI) from contaminated aqueous samples
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
1
12
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.968214
Taşar
Ş.
Kaya
F.
Özer
A.
2014
Biosorption of lead(II) ions from aqueous solution by peanut shells: equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
2
(
2
),
1018
1026
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.015
.
Thommes
M.
Kaneko
K.
Neimark
A. V.
Olivier
J. P.
Rodriguez-Reinoso
F.
Rouquerol
J.
Sing
K. S.
2015
Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report)
.
Pure and Applied Chemistry
87
(
9–10
),
1051
1069
.
Touihri
M.
Guesmi
F.
Hannachi
C.
Hamrouni
B.
Sellaoui
L.
Badawi
M.
Poch
J.
Fiol
N.
2021
Single and simultaneous adsorption of Cr(VI) and Cu (II) on a novel Fe3O4/pine cones gel beads nanocomposite: experiments, characterization and isotherms modeling
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
416
,
129101
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129101
.
Valentín-Reyes
J.
García-Reyes
R. B.
García-González
A.
Soto-Regalado
E.
Cerino-Córdova
F.
2019
Adsorption mechanisms of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions on modified activated carbons
.
Journal of Environmental Management
236
,
815
822
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.014
.
Wang
Q.
Zhou
C.
Kuang
Y.
Jiang
Z.
Yang
M.
2020
Removal of hexavalent chromium in aquatic solutions by pomelo peel
.
Water Science and Engineering
13
(
1
),
65
73
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.12.011
.
Ye
Z.
Yin
X.
Chen
L.
He
X.
Lin
Z.
Liu
C.
Ning
S.
Wang
X.
Wei
Y.
2019
Integrated process for removal and recovery of Cr(VI) from electroplating wastewater by ion exchange and reduction–precipitation based on a silica-supported pyridine resin
.
Journal of Cleaner Production.
Yi
Y.
Lv
J.
Liu
Y.
Wu
G.
2017
Synthesis and application of modified Litchi peel for removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions
.
Journal of Molecular Liquids
225
,
28
33
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.140
.
Zhao
B.
Ren
L.
Du
Y.
Wang
J.
2020
Eco-friendly separation layers based on waste peanut shell for gravity-driven water-in-oil emulsion separation
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
255
,
120184
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120184
.
Zhu
C.-S.
Wang
L.-P.
Chen
W.
2009
Removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solution by agricultural by-product: peanut hull
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
168
(
2–3
),
739
746
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.085
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).