Abstract
In this study, electrochemical oxidation of combed fabric dyeing wastewater was investigated using graphite electrodes. The response surface methodology (RSM) was used to design the experiments via the central composite design (CCD). The planned experiments were done to track color changes and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal. The experimental results were used to develop optimization models using RSM and the artificial neural network (ANN) and they were compared. The developed models by the two methods were in good agreement with the experimental results. The optimum conditions were found at 150 A/m2, pH 5, and 120 min. The removal efficiencies for color and COD reached 96.6% and 77.69%, respectively. The operating cost at the optimum conditions was also estimated. The energy and the cost of 1 m3 of wastewater required 34.9 kWh and 2.58 US$, respectively. The graphite electrodes can be successfully utilized for treatment of combed fabric dyeing wastewater with reasonable cost.
Highlights
Electrochemical oxidation of combed fabric dyeing wastewater was investigated using graphite electrodes.
The optimum conditions were found at 150 A/m2, pH 5, and 120 min.
The removal efficiencies for the color and COD reached 96.60% and 77.69%, respectively.
INTRODUCTION
The textile industry is a competitive industry that has a crucial role in any developed/developing community. Unfortunately, the textile industries produce a large amount of wastewater (GilPavas et al. 2020). According to Neill et al. (1999), a large amount of water (125–250) L is required for 1 kg of the finished product (Neill et al. 1999). Thus the textile industry produces enormous wastewater quantities with dyestuff, surfactants, and additives, which have dangerous effects on the environment and humans (Aravind et al. 2016; Saleh et al. 2019a).
In the last decade, several methods were examined to treat textile wastewater. Yagub and colleagues (2014) reviewed the use of adsorption in dye removal from the aqueous solutions (Yagub et al. 2014). The regeneration of the adsorbent and the production of secondary pollutants have limited the process (Yalvaç et al. 2020). Membrane technology was also applied to treat and recycle textile wastewater (Cengiz Yatmaz et al. 2017; Nadeem et al. 2019). The initial cost and the fouling issues had not favored the membrane filtration (Lin et al. 2016). Coagulation and flocculation methods were also employed (Verma et al. 2012), but the possibility of generating extra sludge had become a significant concern (Amaral-Silva et al. 2016). According to Soares et al. (2017), biological treatment may not be sufficient if applied alone (Soares et al. 2017). Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) were implemented (Carvalho & Carvalho 2017). Despite their high performance, AOPs may generate other pollutants (Gągol et al. 2018). In regard to this, the electrochemical techniques have become more favorable because of their functionality, simplicity, safety, eco-friendliness, and low costs (Brillas & Martínez-Huitle 2015). The electrochemical treatment can degrade the pollutants in the textile wastewater via direct or indirect oxidation (Radjenovic & Sedlak 2015). The electrochemical techniques mainly include electrocoagulation/electro floatation, electro oxidation (EO), and electro reduction (Brillas & Martínez-Huitle 2015).
EO has become the most popular electrochemical technique because it eliminates the redox chemicals, facilitates the reaction control by managing the current or potential, and increases the onsite treatment possibility (Panizza & Cerisola 2005). The material of the anode can influence the electrochemical mechanism and the produced material (Särkkä et al. 2015). Lead and lead oxide (Awad & Abo Galwa 2005), boron-doped diamond (Koparal et al. 2007; Zhu et al. 2018; Kuchtová et al. 2020), dimensionally stable anode (DSA) (Tavares et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2012), and activated carbon cloth (ACC) (Cukierman 2013) electrodes were used as a base for the electrode in the EO process. Graphite electrodes had the attention of the researchers because of their low cost, low resistivity, chemical inertness and good conductivity (Kariyajjanavar et al. 2013a, 2013b). The degradation of the dyes by graphite electrodes can occur via direct or indirect oxidation (Hamza et al. 2011). The direct oxidation occurs at the graphite surface or electron transfer directly to the graphite anode. The presence of chlorine in the textile wastewater effluents makes indirect oxidation the dominant degradation mechanism. The oxidation of chlorine at the graphite anode yields active species that can oxidize the pollutants (Isik et al. 2020).
The combed fabric dyeing wastewater has a high chlorine concentration (14,515 mg/L). Thus, the graphite electrode can be considered an attractive solution. This study aims to explore the removal efficiency of color and chemical oxygen demand (COD) from the combed fabric dyeing wastewater by graphite electrodes. The affecting parameters (pH, time, and applied current) were optimized. The traditional methods of optimization are not able to describe the complicated interaction among the variables and the responses (Taherkhani et al. 2018). The response surface methodology (RSM) is a mix of statistical and mathematical techniques that could be used to solve this issue (Körbahti & Demirbüken 2017; Gadekar & Ahammed 2019). The RSM starts with experiment design, followed by model fitting and verification, and ends with determining the optimum conditions step (Darvishmotevalli et al. 2019). In this study, the central composite design (CCD) was used to design the experiments. Furthermore, the artificial neural network (ANN) was used to model and optimize the electrooxidation process. ANN is another modeling technique that has the advantage of the ability to create a nonlinear relationship between the affecting factors and the proposed responses without any prior knowledge of the nature of the relationship (Elfghi 2016; Yabalak & Yilmaz 2019). The design matrix and the final pH values obtained from RSM were utilized to build an ANN neural network. In this way, the modeling results had a more precise prediction. So, the results from the two methods were compared and examined statistically. Finally, the operational cost of the EO of the combed fabric dyeing wastewater by the graphite electrodes at the optimum conditions was analyzed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Combed fabric dyeing wastewater was collected from a textile factory in Gaziantep province, Turkey. The wastewater was characterized based on the American Public Health Association Standard Methods (Rice et al. 2017). The characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Parameter . | Unit . | Value . |
---|---|---|
COD | mg/L | 833 |
TSS | mg/L | 12 |
Sulfate (SO4) | mg/L | 164 |
Total nitrogen | mg/L | 51.3 |
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen | mg/L | 47.8 |
pH | – | 6.9 |
Conductivity | μS/cm | 3,030 |
Color | Pt-Co | 2,213 |
Chloride | mg/L | 1,451 |
Parameter . | Unit . | Value . |
---|---|---|
COD | mg/L | 833 |
TSS | mg/L | 12 |
Sulfate (SO4) | mg/L | 164 |
Total nitrogen | mg/L | 51.3 |
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen | mg/L | 47.8 |
pH | – | 6.9 |
Conductivity | μS/cm | 3,030 |
Color | Pt-Co | 2,213 |
Chloride | mg/L | 1,451 |
TSS. total suspended solids.
Experimental setup
The EO experiments were conducted in a batch reactor (Figure 1). The reactor consists of a 400 mL borosilicate glass reactor, two graphite electrodes with 5 cm width × 8 cm height × 2 mm thickness, a digital DC power supply (AATech ADC-3303D, Germany, maximum voltage of 30 V) with two connecting wires, and a magnetic stirrer (Wisd -Wisestir MSH-20A, Germany) with a Teflon-covered magnetic stirring bar. A sample of 200 mL of the textile wastewater was inserted inside the borosilicate glass reactor, followed by placing the electrode pairs with a 2 cm distance between them and connected to the DC power supply with the wires. The stirring process at 300 rpm continued simultaneously with the EO experiments.
RSM and ANN
CCD as an approach in response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the affecting parameter. CCD is a statistical method for multivariate nonlinear model development. The developed model can be used to explore the relationship between the parameters. CCD is also applied for regression model equations calculation. The applied current, pH, and time were used as model variables to design the experiments by Design Expert Version 11.0 [Stat-Ease]. The removal efficiencies obtained from the preliminary studies, α-values for the low and maximum level, and the economic perspectives were the basis for the ranges of the variables selection process. The ranges of the factors were selected based on many criteria. Table 2 represents the variables and their ranges. In total, 20 experiments were carried out to track the effects of the parameter changes on COD and color.
Variable . | Unit . | Factor . | Low . | High . | − α . | + α . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current | A/m2 | A | 50 | 150 | 15.91 | 184.09 |
pH | – | B | 5 | 9 | 3.64 | 10.36 |
Time | Min | C | 60 | 120 | 39.55 | 140.45 |
Variable . | Unit . | Factor . | Low . | High . | − α . | + α . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current | A/m2 | A | 50 | 150 | 15.91 | 184.09 |
pH | – | B | 5 | 9 | 3.64 | 10.36 |
Time | Min | C | 60 | 120 | 39.55 | 140.45 |
ANN modeling was integrated with the RSM using the pH values at the end of the experiments. In the ANN, the network type was a feed-forward artificial neural network. The network included an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer. The experiment matrix in the CCD was used as a base for the ANN modeling. The input for the ANN was the experiment conditions in addition to the final pH. The output layer was the removal efficiencies for color and COD. The neurons required in the hidden layer were determined by trial and error to obtain the maximum regression with minimum errors. In this study four neurons were used. The designed ANN is shown in Figure 2.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Color removal
CCD was used to study the effect of the independent variables on color removal. The results were tested by linear, two-factor interaction (2FI), quadratic, and cubic models. Based on their regression coefficients, the linear model was selected to represent the results. Table 3 shows the regression coefficients for the tested models.
Source . | Sequential p-value . | Lack of fit p-value . | Adjusted R2 . | Predicted R2 . | Note . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linear | 1.22E-10 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.91 | Suggested |
2FI | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.95 | 0.87 | – |
Quadratic | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.95 | 0.82 | – |
Cubic | 0.62 | 0.02 | 0.94 | −1.77 | Aliased |
Source . | Sequential p-value . | Lack of fit p-value . | Adjusted R2 . | Predicted R2 . | Note . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linear | 1.22E-10 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.91 | Suggested |
2FI | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.95 | 0.87 | – |
Quadratic | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.95 | 0.82 | – |
Cubic | 0.62 | 0.02 | 0.94 | −1.77 | Aliased |
The prediction ability of the developed model was also examined by the analysis of variance (ANOVA). According to Table 4, the model has a large F-value (101.97) and a p-value smaller than 0.0001. These values show that the model is significant and can be used in color removal prediction. The model was also found to be non-significant in the lack of fit test. The model has a predicted R² of 0.91 that reasonably agreed with the adjusted R² of 0.94 since the difference is less than 0.20. Also, the model has an adequate precision, since the model ratio 31.42 is larger than 4.
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean . | F-value . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 250.11 | 3.00 | 83.37 | 101.97 | 1.22E-10 |
A-Current | 146.76 | 1.00 | 146.76 | 179.50 | 4.10E-10 |
B-pH | 1.63 | 1.00 | 1.63 | 1.99 | 0.18 |
C-Time | 101.72 | 1.00 | 101.72 | 124.42 | 5.88E-09 |
Residual | 13.08 | 16.00 | 0.82 | – | – |
Lack of Fit | 11.45 | 11.00 | 1.04 | 3.19 | 0.10 |
Pure Error | 1.63 | 5.00 | 0.33 | – | – |
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean . | F-value . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 250.11 | 3.00 | 83.37 | 101.97 | 1.22E-10 |
A-Current | 146.76 | 1.00 | 146.76 | 179.50 | 4.10E-10 |
B-pH | 1.63 | 1.00 | 1.63 | 1.99 | 0.18 |
C-Time | 101.72 | 1.00 | 101.72 | 124.42 | 5.88E-09 |
Residual | 13.08 | 16.00 | 0.82 | – | – |
Lack of Fit | 11.45 | 11.00 | 1.04 | 3.19 | 0.10 |
Pure Error | 1.63 | 5.00 | 0.33 | – | – |
COD removal
COD removal by the EO method was also examined and modeled by the CCD method. The experimental results were fitted to the linear, 2FI, quadratic, and cubic models. The quadratic model had the highest regression values (Table 5). The quadratic model was reduced to improve the regression factor and to have a better data description. The reduced quadratic model had an adjusted R2 of 0.97, while the predicted R2 was 0.95. The reduced quadratic model had adequate precision with a ratio of 44.12.
Source . | Sequential p-Value . | Lack of fit p-value . | Adjusted R2 . | Predicted R2 . | Note . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linear | 0.16 × 10−3 | 0. 20 × 10−3 | 0.65 | 0.50 | – |
2FI | 0.96 | 0.11 × 10−3 | 0.58 | 0.46 | – |
Quadratic | 5.53 × 10−7 | 0.07 | 0.97 | 0.91 | Suggested |
Cubic | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.97 | −0.23 | Aliased |
Source . | Sequential p-Value . | Lack of fit p-value . | Adjusted R2 . | Predicted R2 . | Note . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linear | 0.16 × 10−3 | 0. 20 × 10−3 | 0.65 | 0.50 | – |
2FI | 0.96 | 0.11 × 10−3 | 0.58 | 0.46 | – |
Quadratic | 5.53 × 10−7 | 0.07 | 0.97 | 0.91 | Suggested |
Cubic | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.97 | −0.23 | Aliased |
Reduced Quadratic model : Adjusted R2 0.97, Predicted R2 0.95.
ANOVA was also applied for COD removal model. The model was found to be significant with F-value and p-value of 138.01 and <0.0001, respectively. The model was also examined by lack of fit test. According to the F-value (4.62), the model was a good fit, and the lack of fit is not significant. The significances of model terms were investigated and are shown in Table 6.
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean square . | F-value . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 4,857.24 | 4.00 | 1,214.31 | 138.01 | 1.22 × 10−11 |
A-Current | 3,181.33 | 1.00 | 3,181.33 | 361.56 | 6.55 × 10−12 |
B-pH | 181.63 | 1.00 | 181.63 | 20.64 | 0.39 × 10−3 |
C-Time | 161.60 | 1.00 | 161.60 | 18.37 | 0.65 × 10−3 |
A² | 1,332.68 | 1.00 | 1,332.68 | 151.46 | 3.06 × 10−9 |
Residual | 131.98 | 15.00 | 8.80 | – | – |
Lack of Fit | 119.10 | 10.00 | 11.91 | 4.62 | 0.05 |
Pure Error | 12.89 | 5.00 | 2.58 | – | – |
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean square . | F-value . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 4,857.24 | 4.00 | 1,214.31 | 138.01 | 1.22 × 10−11 |
A-Current | 3,181.33 | 1.00 | 3,181.33 | 361.56 | 6.55 × 10−12 |
B-pH | 181.63 | 1.00 | 181.63 | 20.64 | 0.39 × 10−3 |
C-Time | 161.60 | 1.00 | 161.60 | 18.37 | 0.65 × 10−3 |
A² | 1,332.68 | 1.00 | 1,332.68 | 151.46 | 3.06 × 10−9 |
Residual | 131.98 | 15.00 | 8.80 | – | – |
Lack of Fit | 119.10 | 10.00 | 11.91 | 4.62 | 0.05 |
Pure Error | 12.89 | 5.00 | 2.58 | – | – |
ANN results
The ANN used to predict color and COD removal is shown in Figure 2. The developed ANN was tested by Leverberg Marquartz (LM) algorithm with log sigmoidal as a transform function (Hammoudi et al. 2019). Table 7 shows the performance of the network and the errors calculation based on different indicators.
Performance . | Color Removal . | COD removal . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RSM . | ANN . | RSM . | ANN . | |
MSE | 0.65 | 0.15 | 6.6 | 1.24 |
RMSE | 0.81 | 0.39 | 2.56 | 1.11 |
MAPE | 0.73 | 0.26 | 4.71 | 0.93 |
R2 predicted | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
Performance . | Color Removal . | COD removal . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RSM . | ANN . | RSM . | ANN . | |
MSE | 0.65 | 0.15 | 6.6 | 1.24 |
RMSE | 0.81 | 0.39 | 2.56 | 1.11 |
MAPE | 0.73 | 0.26 | 4.71 | 0.93 |
R2 predicted | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
The mean squared error (MSE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) for the ANN models (color and COD) were lower than the RSM models. The lower value means higher description and prediction capabilities (Gadekar & Ahammed 2019). Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) test is a method to determine the accuracy of the model (Mohamed 2019). Lower values for the MAPE are favorable and mean the model is more accurate. In this case, the ANN models have lower values. ANN models have higher regression coefficients (R2) (Saleh et al. 2019b). To ensure that the models are validated in describing the EO process, the experiments are conducted before and after the modeling process. The experimental results and the modeled results are shown in Table 8.
Run . | Current (A/m2) . | pH . | Time (min) . | Color Removal (%) . | COD removal (%) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental . | RSM . | ANN . | Experimental . | RSM . | ANN . | ||||
1 | 100.00 | 10.36 | 90.00 | 88.61 | 87.94 | 88.80 | 52.89 | 56.58 | 52.88 |
2 | 15.91 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 81.92 | 83.01 | 82.48 | 8.26 | 10.10 | 8.31 |
3 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.34 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 59.80 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
4 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.40 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
5 | 50.00 | 5.00 | 120.00 | 88.39 | 88.32 | 88.14 | 43.18 | 45.01 | 43.18 |
6 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.32 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
7 | 150.00 | 9.00 | 60.00 | 89.38 | 88.73 | 89.37 | 62.00 | 61.36 | 61.37 |
8 | 50.00 | 5.00 | 60.00 | 82.83 | 82.86 | 82.44 | 44.63 | 38.13 | 48.41 |
9 | 150.00 | 5.00 | 120.00 | 96.60 | 94.88 | 96.59 | 77.69 | 75.54 | 77.69 |
10 | 150.00 | 5.00 | 60.00 | 90.06 | 89.42 | 89.68 | 67.98 | 68.66 | 67.98 |
11 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 39.55 | 82.91 | 83.93 | 82.80 | 58.68 | 56.93 | 58.66 |
12 | 184.09 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 92.91 | 94.04 | 92.80 | 59.71 | 61.43 | 59.71 |
13 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.36 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 64.81 | 62.72 | 63.45 |
14 | 100.00 | 3.64 | 90.00 | 88.79 | 89.11 | 89.29 | 63.84 | 68.85 | 63.81 |
15 | 50.00 | 9.00 | 60.00 | 82.83 | 82.17 | 82.55 | 28.72 | 30.84 | 28.85 |
16 | 50.00 | 9.00 | 120.00 | 88.48 | 87.63 | 88.33 | 40.29 | 37.72 | 40.27 |
17 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.34 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
18 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 140.45 | 92.50 | 93.11 | 92.51 | 69.42 | 68.50 | 69.38 |
19 | 150.00 | 9.00 | 120.00 | 92.77 | 94.19 | 92.76 | 71.07 | 68.24 | 71.07 |
20 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 89.75 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
Run . | Current (A/m2) . | pH . | Time (min) . | Color Removal (%) . | COD removal (%) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental . | RSM . | ANN . | Experimental . | RSM . | ANN . | ||||
1 | 100.00 | 10.36 | 90.00 | 88.61 | 87.94 | 88.80 | 52.89 | 56.58 | 52.88 |
2 | 15.91 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 81.92 | 83.01 | 82.48 | 8.26 | 10.10 | 8.31 |
3 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.34 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 59.80 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
4 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.40 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
5 | 50.00 | 5.00 | 120.00 | 88.39 | 88.32 | 88.14 | 43.18 | 45.01 | 43.18 |
6 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.32 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
7 | 150.00 | 9.00 | 60.00 | 89.38 | 88.73 | 89.37 | 62.00 | 61.36 | 61.37 |
8 | 50.00 | 5.00 | 60.00 | 82.83 | 82.86 | 82.44 | 44.63 | 38.13 | 48.41 |
9 | 150.00 | 5.00 | 120.00 | 96.60 | 94.88 | 96.59 | 77.69 | 75.54 | 77.69 |
10 | 150.00 | 5.00 | 60.00 | 90.06 | 89.42 | 89.68 | 67.98 | 68.66 | 67.98 |
11 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 39.55 | 82.91 | 83.93 | 82.80 | 58.68 | 56.93 | 58.66 |
12 | 184.09 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 92.91 | 94.04 | 92.80 | 59.71 | 61.43 | 59.71 |
13 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.36 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 64.81 | 62.72 | 63.45 |
14 | 100.00 | 3.64 | 90.00 | 88.79 | 89.11 | 89.29 | 63.84 | 68.85 | 63.81 |
15 | 50.00 | 9.00 | 60.00 | 82.83 | 82.17 | 82.55 | 28.72 | 30.84 | 28.85 |
16 | 50.00 | 9.00 | 120.00 | 88.48 | 87.63 | 88.33 | 40.29 | 37.72 | 40.27 |
17 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 88.34 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
18 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 140.45 | 92.50 | 93.11 | 92.51 | 69.42 | 68.50 | 69.38 |
19 | 150.00 | 9.00 | 120.00 | 92.77 | 94.19 | 92.76 | 71.07 | 68.24 | 71.07 |
20 | 100.00 | 7.00 | 90.00 | 89.75 | 88.52 | 88.37 | 62.81 | 62.72 | 62.64 |
Parameters' effects
The effects of current density, pH, and time on the EO of combed fabric dyeing wastewater were explored. Combed fabric dyeing wastewater was exposed to varied current densities (50–150 A/m2). The current density is linearly proportional to color removal (Figure 3(a) and 3(b)). The maximum color removal (95%) occurred at the current 150 A/m2, while the minimum color removal was 82% at the current density of 50 A/m2. Figure 3(c) and 3(d) show the contour map for the removal of color using the EO process with the changes in the current, pH, and time.
The optimum time required to degrade color and COD was found to be 120 min (Figures 3(d) and 4(d)). The removal efficiencies increased with the increase in time. At 60 min, the removal efficiencies for color and COD were 89 and 68%, respectively. The removal efficiencies increased to reach 95% for color and 76% for COD at 90 min.
The optimum conditions for textile wastewater treatment by graphite electrode were determined. The maximum color and COD removal were when the applied current reached 150 A/cm2, pH was 5, and the reaction continued to 120 min. At the optimum conditions, color was removed with a percentage of 96.6% and COD was degraded with a percentage of 77.7%. The EO of textile wastewater by the graphite electrodes had successfully reduced color and COD to meet the Turkish discharge standards for textile industry wastewaters (Hukuk ve Mevzuat Genel Müdürlüğü 2004). Table 9 shows the initial and final concentrations along with the standard concentration.
. | Unit . | Initial value . | Final value . | Standard . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Color | Pt-Co | 2,213 | 75.2 | 260 |
pH | – | 6.9 | 6.5 | 6–9 |
COD | mg/L | 833 | 185.8 | 200 |
. | Unit . | Initial value . | Final value . | Standard . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Color | Pt-Co | 2,213 | 75.2 | 260 |
pH | – | 6.9 | 6.5 | 6–9 |
COD | mg/L | 833 | 185.8 | 200 |
Anode efficiency and cost analysis
The treatment cost for 1 m3 of the textile wastewater was estimated by multiplying the SEG (kWh/m3) by the cost of the kilowatts per hour. According to the Turkish Electricity Distribution Company, the cost of 1kwh is about 0.074 US$. Table 10 presents the cost analysis of the treatment of textile wastewater by EO at the optimum conditions.
Indicator . | Unit . | Value . |
---|---|---|
SEG | kWh/m3 | 34.90 |
SEG-Color | kWh/kg color | 16.33 |
SEG-COD | kWh/kg COD | 53.92 |
Energy cost | US$/m3 | 2.58 |
Indicator . | Unit . | Value . |
---|---|---|
SEG | kWh/m3 | 34.90 |
SEG-Color | kWh/kg color | 16.33 |
SEG-COD | kWh/kg COD | 53.92 |
Energy cost | US$/m3 | 2.58 |
The results in Table 9 show that the treatment of the textile wastewater by the EO method with a graphite electrode is efficient. The energy and the cost of 1 m3 of wastewater required just 34.90 kWh and 2.58 US$, respectively. These results are lower than in the study by Isik and colleagues (2020), who used activated carbon cloth as electrodes (Isik et al. 2020). A comparison with other works is shown in Table 11.
Electrodes . | Optimum conditions . | Removal efficiency (%) . | Energy consumption . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anode: Graphite Cathode: Graphite | Current density: 150 A/m2 pH:5 Time: 120 min | COD: 77.69% Color: 96.6% | 34.90 kWh/m3 | This study |
Anode: ACC Cathode: ACC | Current density: 100 A/m2 pH: 7 Time: 60 min | COD: 95.5% Color: 95.5% | 36 kWh/m3 | Isik et al. (2020) |
Anode: Expanded graphite/attapulgite composite materials Cathode: Copper | Current density: 7.5 mA/cm2 pH: 7 Time: 60 min | COD: 43.6% Color: 100% | – | Kong et al. (2009) |
Anode: Ti/RuO2 Cathode: Aluminum | Current density: 1.41 mA/cm2 pH: 5.41 Time: 130 min | Color: 88% | – | Kaur et al. (2020) |
Anode: BDD Cathode: Fe | Current density: 10 mA/cm2 pH: 5.41 Time: 60 min | COD: 88% Color: 100% | 3.83 USD/m3 | GilPavas et al. (2020) |
Electrodes . | Optimum conditions . | Removal efficiency (%) . | Energy consumption . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anode: Graphite Cathode: Graphite | Current density: 150 A/m2 pH:5 Time: 120 min | COD: 77.69% Color: 96.6% | 34.90 kWh/m3 | This study |
Anode: ACC Cathode: ACC | Current density: 100 A/m2 pH: 7 Time: 60 min | COD: 95.5% Color: 95.5% | 36 kWh/m3 | Isik et al. (2020) |
Anode: Expanded graphite/attapulgite composite materials Cathode: Copper | Current density: 7.5 mA/cm2 pH: 7 Time: 60 min | COD: 43.6% Color: 100% | – | Kong et al. (2009) |
Anode: Ti/RuO2 Cathode: Aluminum | Current density: 1.41 mA/cm2 pH: 5.41 Time: 130 min | Color: 88% | – | Kaur et al. (2020) |
Anode: BDD Cathode: Fe | Current density: 10 mA/cm2 pH: 5.41 Time: 60 min | COD: 88% Color: 100% | 3.83 USD/m3 | GilPavas et al. (2020) |
BDD: boron-doped diamond.
CONCLUSION
The textile industry is a competitive industry that has a crucial role in any developed/developing community. Unfortunately, the textile industries produce a large amount of wastewater. The textile wastewater has large quantities of dyestuff, which have dangerous effects on the environment and humans. In this study, the treatment of combed fabric dyeing wastewater by graphite electrode was explored for the removal of color and COD. The affecting parameters (pH, time, and current) were optimized using RSM and ANN. As expected, the developed ANN has described the results more precisely. Based on the two models, the optimum conditions were found to be 150 A/m2, pH 5, and 120 min. The removal efficiencies for color and COD reached 96.6% and 77.69%, respectively. The operating cost at the optimum conditions was also estimated. The energy and the cost of 1 m3 of wastewater required just 34.90 kWh and 2.58 US$, respectively. Although an efficient treatment application was utilized successfully to treat combed fabric dyeing wastewater, the graphite electrodes still suffer from carbon corrosion problems, which affects the EO process performance.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This project was supported by Scientific Research Projects Council of Mersin University (Project number: 2021-1-TP2-4262).
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.