Considering the urgent need for disposal of red mud and the comprehensive treatment of coal mined-out areas, this paper presented red mud-based cementitious paste filling material (RMFM) to achieve the purpose of green filling treatment. However, the solidification performance of alkaline RMFM for contaminants can be affected when in contact with acid goaf water in practice, which may in turn cause secondary pollution to the surroundings. The leaching tests of RMFM under different pH and redox potential (Eh) conditions were designed to investigate the effects of environmental elements on the solidification performance of RMFM, and primarily investigated the treatment effectiveness of RMFM on goaf water. The test results manifest that the acidic and oxidizing environments could damage the hydration products generated by alkali and sulfate activation, thus affecting the solidification performance, while the alkaline and reducing environments could effectively prevent the release of the contaminants by enhancing the degree of alkali activation and inhibiting oxidation acid forming process. In the possible exposure environment, RMFM could effectively stabilize its own pollutants without secondary pollution. In addition, the powder RMFM samples had significant removal effects on heavy metals, the values of Cu, Pb, and As removal efficiency all reached more than 96.15%.

  • RMFM can be used to achieve the purpose of green goaf filling treatment.

  • RMFM could effectively stabilize/solidify heavy metals through alkali and sulfate activation.

  • RMFM could release more contaminants in the acidic and oxidizing environment.

  • The alkaline and reducing environments could effectively prevent the release of the contaminants.

  • The powder RMFM samples had significant removal effects on heavy metals.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Coal resources occupy a leading position in China's energy supply (Haibin & Zhenling 2010; Zhao et al. 2020) and play a crucial role in the development of economic growth and social progress (Sun et al. 2012, 2015). However, improper exploitation of coal resources has brought about serious environmental problems. After coal mining, multi-mined-out areas are formed, then threaten the safety of surface buildings engineering activities above (Kesimal et al. 2004; Hesketh et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2020). Further, groundwater gradually accumulates and is easy to form acidic goaf water (Jiang et al. 2020), and consequently generates disastrous water resource and ecological environmental risks. Therefore, comprehensive treatment of coal mined-out areas is necessary. At present, the main approach for governing goaf is grouting filling, and the cement-based materials are main materials of grouting filling method. However, this method has a high cement consumption, without environmental and economic advantages.

Red mud is a solid waste residue generated from the digestion process of the bauxite ores with caustic soda for alumina production. The effective disposal of red mud remains a worldwide issue, most of which is stored by the stacking method, bringing environmental challenges such as soil salinization, groundwater pollution, dust pollution, etc. (Sutar 2014). The alternative utilization efforts have been mainly focused on three aspects: the first is the extraction and recovery of the valuable metals (Şayan & Bayramoğlu 2004; Kumar et al. 2006; Lu et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2016); the second is the production of the construction materials (Kalkan 2006; Feigl et al. 2017; Tang et al. 2018) and the third is the production of absorbents (Gupta et al. 2001; Tor et al. 2006, 2009; Huang et al. 2008; Garau et al. 2011). In general, the utilization and safe disposal of the bulk amounts of red mud are currently needed.

Therefore, using red mud, fly ash and other solid waste to prepare cementitious filling materials for goaf treatment instead of cement-based materials cannot only consume a large amount of red mud to reduce environmental pollution, but also contributes to energy conservation and pollution reduction, showing the remarkable social and economic benefit. However, the presence of high alkalinity and polluting elements restrict the recovery and utilization of red mud from the industrial solid waste (Zhang et al. 2016). Previous studies have reported that the content of the heavy metal elements such as Pb, As, Cr and Cu in red mud is high, and F is the main polluting anion in the red mud production process (Liu et al. 2014; Xue et al. 2016). To achieve optimal recovery and utilization of red mud based on safety, it is necessary to study the mechanism of the solidification performance of RMFM. Therefore, the micro-morphology of RMFM samples were observed under SEM in this paper, and then analyzed its stabilization/solidification mechanisms of materials to contaminants.

When using alkaline RMFM in practice, it is inevitable to contact with acid goaf water, and then neutralization happens, thus affecting the solidification performance of RMFM for contaminants and the composition of goaf water, which in turn cause secondary pollution to the surrounding environment. Therefore, the possible impact on the surrounding environment caused by the contact between RMFM and goaf water must be taken into account.

Plenty of studies have shown that goaf water is produced as a result of the oxidation of sulfur-rich coal or gangue/spoils (He et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2020) such as pyrite (FeS2) (Lazareva et al. 2019), and subsequent contraction with water for the formation of sulfuric acid (Mokgehle et al. 2019). Basically, goaf water is characterized by low pH value. When neutralization between acid goaf water and alkaline RMFM happens, the solidification performance of RMFM and the composition of goaf water will be affected, and the pH of solution exerts a significant effect on the reaction result and extent. In addition, after coal is mined out, the original reducing environment is gradually changed into an oxidizing environment due to aeration, and after the goaf grouting filling treatment, the goaf can become a closed reducing environment again, but the change of redox environment has varying degrees depending on the filling compaction rate. Eh (redox potential) represents the relative degree of environmental oxidizability and reducibility, and is an index of environmental redox state reflected by potential. As a basic factor of chemical and biochemical action in the environment, redox can affect the chemical behavior, migration ability and biological effectiveness of element by changing its distribution and existent morphology, thus has become a crucial factor that influences environmental behaviors.

Therefore, the leaching tests of RMFM under different pH and Eh conditions were designed to investigate the effects of environment on the solidifying effect of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F by RMFM. To simulate the actual condition, the static immersion tests of RMFM in goaf water was also designed to supply the theoretical evidence for the feasibility of RMFM. Finally, primarily investigated the treatment effectiveness of RMFM on acid goaf water in this study, which provides new ideas for comprehensive treatment of mined-out areas.

Materials

The raw materials used to make RMFM include red mud, fly ash, cement, slag powder and desulfurized gypsum. These materials were supplied by Shanxi YunQuan Geotechnical Engineering Technology Co. Ltd, and their chemical compositions are summarized in Table 1. Red mud was the product of the Bayer process, and its pH value was measured to be 12.73 by Soil Quality-Determination of pH (NY/T 1377-2007) analysis procedures.

Table 1

Chemical composition of red mud, fly ash, cement, slag powder and desulfurized gypsum (wt%)

Chemical compositionRed mudFly ashCementSlag powderDesulfurized gypsum
SiO2 21.44 27.32 23.46 30.98 3.3 
Al2O3 22.73 20.41 6.6 14.6 2.22 
CaO 16.43 17.2 56.79 38.15 34.4 
Na211.45 0.33 0.19 0.36 0.11 
Fe2O3 9.98 4.24 2.88 0.3 0.47 
TiO2 3.95 0.75 2.16 0.08 
K20.43 0.5 0.69 0.37 0.11 
SO3 7.96 2.1 2.31 38.66 
MgO 2.03 2.19 9.07 1.33 
P2O5 0.29 0.03 0.02 
PbO 0.012 
As2O3 0.007 
Cr2O3 0.048 
Loss in ignition 13.52 18.62 3.69 0.98 19.1 
Chemical compositionRed mudFly ashCementSlag powderDesulfurized gypsum
SiO2 21.44 27.32 23.46 30.98 3.3 
Al2O3 22.73 20.41 6.6 14.6 2.22 
CaO 16.43 17.2 56.79 38.15 34.4 
Na211.45 0.33 0.19 0.36 0.11 
Fe2O3 9.98 4.24 2.88 0.3 0.47 
TiO2 3.95 0.75 2.16 0.08 
K20.43 0.5 0.69 0.37 0.11 
SO3 7.96 2.1 2.31 38.66 
MgO 2.03 2.19 9.07 1.33 
P2O5 0.29 0.03 0.02 
PbO 0.012 
As2O3 0.007 
Cr2O3 0.048 
Loss in ignition 13.52 18.62 3.69 0.98 19.1 

Goaf water

Goaf water around an abandoned coal mine in Yangquan City, Shanxi Province was observed to be yellowish brown and the water quality proved to be poor. As can be seen from Table 2, the goaf water sample is acidic, and the ion concentrations of F, Pb and Cu all exceed their respective contamination limits in groundwater (GB/T14848-2017), with the exceed multiples of 2.6, 15.6, 4.07 times respectively.

Table 2

The pH value and leaching concentrations (mg/L) of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F in the goaf water sample

pH valueFPbCuAsCr
Goaf water 2.31 5.4 0.83 5.07 0.013 <0.004 
Contamination limits 6.5–8.5 1.5 0.05 0.05 0.05 
pH valueFPbCuAsCr
Goaf water 2.31 5.4 0.83 5.07 0.013 <0.004 
Contamination limits 6.5–8.5 1.5 0.05 0.05 0.05 

RMFM samples preparation

RMFM was synthesized at mixing red mud, fly ash, cement, desulfurized gypsum and slag powder ratios of 55:30:7.5:5:2.5, and water-solid ratio of 1:1.2 (the proportion can effectively meet the performance and mechanical properties needed from a filling material). For subsequent static immersion test, a batch of cylindrical samples with a diameter of 22.3 mm and a height of 53.5 mm were prepared. The raw materials were mixed with water for 30 min, poured into molds, shaken for 5 min to eliminate the bubbles introduced during the mixing process, and cured for 28 d at room temperature (∼23 °C) and relative humidity of 40–50%. In addition, the powder samples with a particle size less than 45 μm were prepared by grinding the cured cylindrical samples for leaching tests.

Mechanism analysis of heavy metal stabilization/solidification by RMFM

The microstructures of the sample sections were examined with a scanning electron microscope. First, the SEM images of RMFM samples that shielded desulfurized gypsum (at red mud: fly ash: cement: slag ratio of 55:35:7.5:2.5, water-solid ratio of 1:1.2) maintained for 3 d, 7 d and 28 d were observed, and the formation mechanism of hydration products in an alkali activated system was analyzed. In addition, the sulfate activated principle was analyzed by comparing the micro-morphology of fly ash particles in samples with and without desulphurization gypsum. The reaction mechanisms and hydration products of the samples were investigated to gain insights into the stabilization/solidification mechanism by RMFM to heavy metals.

Leaching tests

The actual water environment in goaf is complex. In this study, the effect of the water environments with different pH and Eh values have been studied on the solidification performance of RMFM.

1 M HCl and NaOH (analytical grade) as well as deionized water were used to configure five groups solutions with different pH values. The measured initial pH values were 2.33, 4.11, 6.86, 9.48 and 12.03, which were marked as T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively. The prepared powder samples were continuously oscillated and extracted in each solution for 8 h with a mass ratio of 1:20, repeated twice. After standing for 16 h, the leachate was collected and pressure filtered through a 0.45 μm filterpaper. Subsequently, the pH value and ion concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F were determined.

Using deionized water, hydrogen peroxide and solutions with addition of dissolved organic matter (DOM), five groups of solutions with different Eh value were configured with the platinum and Ag-AgCl (reference) electrodes, which were marked as T6, T7, T8, T9 and T10, respectively. The initial Eh value of T6, T7, T8 (representing different concentrations of the solution with addition of dissolved organic matter) were −94, 4 and 89 mV respectively, representing the reducing environment, whereas the initial Eh values of the T9 (aerated deionized water) and T10 (made of hydrogen peroxide and deionized water) were 220 and 430 mV respectively, representing the oxidizing environment. The leachate was collected and filtered after leaching, followed by the determination of the pH and Eh values as well as the ion concentrations of the Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F after a period of time.

RMFM's adsorption tests to heavy metals

The prepared powder RMFM samples and goaf water were mixed in conical bottles with a mass ratio of 1:20 and oscillated continuously on a horizontal oscillator. After leaching, the leachates were filtered and collected, repeated twice, and then the pH value and ion concentrations of Cu, Pb and As were determined.

Static immersion test

To simulate the use of RMFM under actual condition, the cylindrical samples were statically immersed in goaf water, and the soaking duration was 8 h, 24 h, 3 d, 7 d and 14 d respectively, repeated twice. After soaking, the solution was filtered and collected, and then the concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F were determined.

Analytical methods

The microstructures of the sample sections were examined by using a scanning electron microscope (SX-40, Hitachi, Japan). The pH and Eh values were determined by using a pH meter (pH-3C, Shanghai Precision and Scientific Instrument Ltd, China). The concentrations of Cu, Pb and Cr were determined by using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS, ZA3000, Hitachi, Japan), whereas the As concentration was determined by employing an atomic fluorescence spectrophotometer (AFS, F-7100, Hitachi, Japan), and the F and SO42− contents were measured through an ion chromatograph (IC-2010, Tosoh, Japan).

Mechanism of heavy metal solidification by RMFM

Microstructural changes in RMFM samples

Alkali activation is the generic term which is applied to the reaction of a solid aluminosilicate (termed the ‘precursor’, most common aluminosilicate supplementary cementitious materials are suitable for use, with blast furnace slag, coalfly ash, calcined clays and natural pozzolans having been demonstrated to give good results) under alkaline conditions (induced by the ‘alkali activator’), to produce a hardened binder which is based on a combination of hydrous alkali-aluminosilicate and/or alkali-alkali earth-aluminosilicate phases (Provis 2018). As a kind of alkali-activated cementitious material, the high content of alkali in red mud as well as the cement hydration product Ca(OH)2 could active the glass phase aluminosilicate in fly ash and slag, then dissolution and polycondensation occurred, thus, forming a geopolymer material with high strength cementitious network structure.

Through the SEM analysis of RMFM samples that shielded desulfurized gypsum (shielding the effect of ettringite crystals on hydration products) maintained for 3 d, 7 d and 28 d, the SEM images were compared to reveal the changes in their microstructures. As can be seen in Figure 1, with time, an increasing extent of the amorphous reticular hydration products was observed. As shown in Figure 1(a), after 3 d, a large extent of hydration products were produced and wrapped on the surface of the unreacted raw material particles, leading to the loose surface texture. As observed from Figure 1(b), for the samples maintained for 7 d, the formation of a large extent of vitreous hydration products was observed, with smooth, flat and dense cross-section. However, owing to the small volume, numerous vitreous units and extensive crystal phase interfaces, a large extent of grain boundaries could be easily destroyed by the external forces, thus leading to poor overall strength of the samples. As shown in Figure 1(c), for the samples maintained for 28 d, the hydrated products developed into a large-volume vitreous body with extremely dense structure and almost complete hydration. With time, the bonding and overall strength of the sample gradually increased.

Figure 1

SEM images of the shielded desulfurized gypsum RMFM samples maintenance for (a) 3 d, (b) 7 d and (c) 28 d.

Figure 1

SEM images of the shielded desulfurized gypsum RMFM samples maintenance for (a) 3 d, (b) 7 d and (c) 28 d.

Close modal

The SEM results show that during the initial stage of reaction, a large fraction of alkaline substances in red mud gathered around the fly ash and slag particles and broke into the vitreous body, thus, resulting in the rupture and recombination of the Si-O and Al-O bonds as well as the formation of a large number of [SiO4]4− and [AlO4]4−. Subsequently, the Ca2+ interacted with these ions to form hydration products such as C-S-H (calcium silicate hydrate), C-A-S-H (calcium silicoaluminate hydrate) gels, etc. The network structure of these hydration products tightly encased the particles. On one hand, these hydration products overlapped with each other to form a network skeleton. On the other hand, these hydration products were filled and interspersed in the pores of the material, reducing the porosity and optimizing the pore structure, improving the density of the material.

Figure 2(a) and 2(b) show the comparison of RMFM sample microstructures without desulfurized gypsum and those containing desulfurized gypsum maintained for 7 d. The addition of desulfurized gypsum introduced a large amount of SO42− into the system, SO42− could combine with AlO2 to form Aft, and consumed a large amount of calcium and aluminum ions in the solution, which significantly improved the dissolution rate of fly ash particles. As shown in Figure 2(b), the surface of fly ash particles was rougher, accompanied by the formation of pits, which can effectively stimulate the activity of fly ash.

Figure 2

SEM images of the fly ash particles (a) in shielded desulfurized gypsum samples and (b) with desulfurized gypsum samples.

Figure 2

SEM images of the fly ash particles (a) in shielded desulfurized gypsum samples and (b) with desulfurized gypsum samples.

Close modal

Sulfate activation is essentially the combined actions of alkali and sulfate activation. In general, the activity of fly ash and slag is not enough to just add sulfate. Only when a certain amount of sulfate is added in the alkaline environment, the activity of the raw material can be brought into full play and a higher gelling strength can be obtained.

The main reactions are as follows:
(1)

Under the combined actions of alkali and sulfate activation, the surface particles of the fly ash and slag in the material were seriously eroded, thus, releasing a large amount of activated silicon and aluminum, and the combination with the Ca2+, OH and SO42− ions in the external environment led to the formation of the hydration products such as C-S-H, C-A-H (calcium aluminate hydrated), AFt (ettringite), etc. These amorphous gels and needle-like AFt were noted to be interspersed in the system, thus improving the overall connectivity and reducing the porosity. Macroscopically, it represents the enhancement of the mechanical properties and performance.

Mechanism analysis of heavy metal stabilization/solidification by RMFM

As a kind of alkali-activated cementitious material, RMFM can effectively stabilize/solidify heavy metals due to its special hydration mechanism and hydration products. And its solidification mechanisms of heavy metals mainly include physical adsorption, encapsulation, and chemical reaction as well as ion exchange.

The physical functions include gelation and physical encapsulation. In the process of hydration reaction, the amorphous aluminosilicate gels in fly ash and slag were hydrated and dissolved by alkaline substances, and gel reaction occurred to form oligomers, which were gradually dehydrated and polymerized to form a network skeleton. During this process, red mud, fly ash and other particles in the reaction could be encapsulated by oligomers in polymers, keeping it unable to contact with leaching medium, thus, the heavy metals contained in the materials could also be encapsulated during the gelation process. The precipitates formed by the reaction of alkaline hydroxide and heavy metals could also be encapsulated in this process. Furthermore, due to the formation of fish-scale-like products on the surface of heavy metal solidified bodies, these products are staggered and dense, thus, the heavy metal ions sealed by oligomers could be firmly contained in the polymers, and, further, the leakage of pollutants was avoided, showing good solidification performance macroscopically.

The chemical functions include chemical absorption and the formation of chemical precipitations. In the process of solidifying metal cations, these ions did not change the structures of [SiO4]4− and [AlO4]4−, rather they participated in the formation of cementitious materials through ion balance. Through chemical interactions, metal cations such as Na+ and K+ were bonded to Al-O and Si-O bonds or existed in the skeleton cavities to maintain charge balance. And researches also demonstrated that when heavy metals such as lead ions have a similar ionic radii to alkali metal ions, alkali metal ions from the network structure can be replaced by these heavy metals to maintain the charge balance of the aluminum-oxide tetrahedron, thereby immobilizing the heavy metals. In addition to being directly encapsulated in the gel process, some heavy metals could form precipitates and then be encapsulated as well. For example, lead ions can react with the dissolved silicon to form Pb3SiO5 (Zhang et al. 2008).

The C-S-H gel is the main hydration product of cementitious materials, which has a large specific surface area and ion exchange capacity, in which the Ca ions could be replaced by Pb and Cr in the interlayers to connect with other elements. Further, the structure of the AFt crystals formed after the addition of desulfurized gypsum reveals that the heavy metal ions could be stabilized in the gaps and channels inside the crystal columns by chemical replacement. Other harmful ions could be precipitated as hydroxides or carbonates.

The mechanisms of RMFM stabilization/solidification of heavy metals, in addition to the above-mentioned main functions of physical encapsulation, physical adsorption, ion exchange as well as chemical precipitation, also include surface complexation and passivation. These functions complement each other and jointly realize the stabilization and solidification of heavy metals (El-Eswed et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019).

Leaching tests as a function of pH

The change of pH value

In this group of leaching tests, the pH values of T1–T5 in leachate after 8 h of continuous oscillations are shown in Table 3. As can be seen, the pH values of each treatment were close and exhibited alkaline.

Table 3

The pH value in the leachate of T1–T5 as a function of time

Leaching time (h)Treatment
T 1T 2T 3T 4T 5
pH 2.33 4.11 6.86 9.48 12.03 
10.10 10.78 10.96 11.01 11.66 
Leaching time (h)Treatment
T 1T 2T 3T 4T 5
pH 2.33 4.11 6.86 9.48 12.03 
10.10 10.78 10.96 11.01 11.66 

The leaching rules of heavy metals under different pH

Figure 3 shows the concentrations of leached Cu, Pb, Cr and As of the treatments 1–5 under different pH. As can be seen directly from Figure 3, with the increase of pH, the leaching concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr and As decreased, generally showing a linear trend. Therefore, it is suggested that the amounts of the heavy metals leached from RMFM had a specific negative correlation with the pH value, and the highest concentrations all appeared at T1. Among them, the ion concentration of Cu in T1 was 0.0359 mg/L, which was 40.1%, 56.8%, 57.7%, 57.7% higher than that in T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively; the leaching concentration of Pb in T1 was 0.0851 mg/L, which was 11.8%, 22.6%, 24.4%, 28.2% higher than that in T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively; the leaching concentration of Cr in T1 was 0.0886 mg/L, which was 6.8%, 37.9%, 68.8%, 71.4% higher than that in T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively; and the leaching concentration of As in T1 was 0.0005 mg/L, which was 40% higher than the other treatments. It is suggested that the concentrations of leached Cu, Pb, Cr and As have similar rules as a function of pH. The stronger is the acidity of the extractant, the higher is the concentration of leached heavy metals; while in neutral and alkaline environments had significantly lower concentrations of heavy metals.

Figure 3

The concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr and As leached from the powder RMFM samples as a function of pH.

Figure 3

The concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr and As leached from the powder RMFM samples as a function of pH.

Close modal

In acidic conditions, the acidic liquid entered the RMFM samples through the capillary pores during the initial stage of leaching and changed the original alkaline environment, and then dissolved partial geopolymer gels, resulting in worse overall adhesion, thus affecting the physical and chemical solidification effects on heavy metals. Furthermore, the alkaline environment could enhance the degree of alkali activation of the system, thus promoting the formation of more hydration products and raising the effect of solidification performance to some extent.

It can be noted that even in T1 (pH = 2.33), the leaching concentrations of heavy metals were still at low levels (<0.15 mg/L, all at trace levels), indicating that RMFM had effectively resisted acid corrosion and maintained good stability/solidification of heavy metals.

The leaching rules of F under different pH

Figure 4 shows the concentrations of F in the leachates of the treatments 1–5. As the figure shows, with the increase of pH, the general tendency of F concentrations gradually decreased and then gradually rose whereas the lowest concentration turns out in T3, which appears neutral with a pH of 6.86.

Figure 4

The leaching concentrations of F leached from the powder RMFM samples as a function of pH.

Figure 4

The leaching concentrations of F leached from the powder RMFM samples as a function of pH.

Close modal
The content of F in solution is closely related to pH. Under natural conditions, water containing excessive fluorine tends to be alkaline. When there is calcium in neutral water, the soluble fluorine reacts with calcium and forms stable calcium fluoride precipitations. In alkaline conditions, calcium is deposited as Ca(OH)2, and the ion concentrations of calcium significantly reduced, subsequently increasing the concentrations of F, as per the hydrolysis equation:
(2)

Therefore, in alkaline conditions, the stronger is the alkalinity, the greater the mobility of F; in acidic environments, similar to the leaching behaviors of heavy metals, the acidic substances could partially dissolve and destroy the geopolymer gels, thus, affecting the ability of the material to immobilize the pollutants. From this it's clear that the neutral environment is beneficial in controlling the mobility of fluorine.

Leaching analysis of RMFM in different redox environments

Variation of Eh and pH values of leachates in different redox conditions

In this set of leaching tests, T6–T8 were subjected to the reducing environments, whereas T9 and T10 were treated with the oxidizing environments. Before this set of leaching tests, the Eh value of RMFM with deionized water as extractant was detected. The results showed that the Eh value of the leachate was 70 mV, showing reducibility. The reducing sulfur in the materials was in a larger proportion, indicating that the RMFM have a certain potential for acid forming.

Table 4 shows the Eh values of the leachates after extraction. The Eh values of the five treatments were noted to increase after continuous oscillation for 8 h, and after leaching, the pH values of T6-T10 were 7.90, 8.03, 8.72, 4.33 and 0.08, respectively. Under reducing treatment, the leachates of T6, T7 and T8 were neutral, while in oxidizing environment, the leachates of T9 and T10 showed acidity, especially in T10 had strong acidity.

Table 4

Variation of Eh value in the leachate of T6–T10 as a function of time

Leaching time (h)Treatment
T 6T 7T 8T 9T 10
Eh (mV) −94 89 220 430 
−51 52 112 231 434 
Leaching time (h)Treatment
T 6T 7T 8T 9T 10
Eh (mV) −94 89 220 430 
−51 52 112 231 434 

After leaching, the concentrations of SO42− in the leachate were detected by ion chromatograph. The concentrations of SO42− in the leachates of T6-T10 were 1.414, 1.601, 1.885, 2.157 and 3.72 g/L, respectively. It is noticeable that the stronger is the oxidizability of the extractant, the higher is the SO42− concentration in the leachate, which indicates that the RMFM samples underwent a typical oxidation acid forming process in the strongly oxidizing environments, and then resulted in high Eh and low pH, along with a large extent of heavy metals and sulfates.

Leaching characteristics of Cu, Pb, Cr and As in different redox environments

Figure 5 shows the leaching concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr and As in T6–T10 under different redox environments. As shown in Figure 5(a) and 5(b), the leaching rules of Cu and Pb exhibited similarly, both presented a gradual increment in concentration on enhancing the extractant oxidizability. The highest leaching concentrations all appeared at T10, which showed strongest oxidizing, and the concentrations were much higher than the other treatments. Among them, the leaching concentration of Cu ions in T10 was 0.4053 mg/L, which was 96.8%, 93.6%, 91.8%, 78% higher than that in T9, T8, T7 and T6, respectively; the leaching concentration of Pb ions in T10 was 0.4123 mg/L, which was 97.8%, 95.7%, 88.9%, 80.6% higher than that in T9, T8, T7 and T6, respectively. In oxidizing environments, the stronger the oxidizability of the leachate, the more acidic substances were produced, the more dissolution of geopolymer gels, which led to more leached Cu and Pb ions. However, the pH values in T6–T8 under reducing treatment were close and exhibited neutral, thus showing lower leaching concentrations of Cu and Pb. Further, although the pH values of the three reducing treatments were close, the stronger the reducibility of the leachate, the significantly lower the concentrations of Cu and Pb, indicating that the reducing environments could inhibit the release of pollutants to a certain extent.

Figure 5

The concentrations of (a) Cu, (b) Pb, (c) Cr and (d) As in different redox environments.

Figure 5

The concentrations of (a) Cu, (b) Pb, (c) Cr and (d) As in different redox environments.

Close modal

Figure 5(c) shows that the highest leaching concentrations of Cr also appeared at T10, which was 4.531 mg/L, and was 40.1%, 56.8%, 57.7%, 57.7% higher than that in T6, T9, T7 and T8, respectively. Different from Cu and Pb, the lowest concentration appeared at T8. In oxidizing environments, the acid forming process of RMFM was also the main reason for the high leaching concentration of Cr. As one of the transition elements, trivalent Cr and hexavalent Cr are two main states of the Cr under natural conditions; the mobility depends on its specific chemical forms and on its binding state. Under the condition of acidity and low redox potential, Cr(VI) can be easily reduced to Cr(III), and the Cr(III) in solutions is noted to be the most thermodynamically stable, which is poorly soluble in water and often exists in the form of insoluble hydroxide. By contrast, Cr(VI) has high solubility and strong mobility, and has been an important factor for groundwater and soil pollution (Fendorf 1995; Shanker et al. 2005). Due to the strong oxidation, Cr was almost in hexavalent state in T10, and the strong acidity further enhanced Cr concentrations. In the other treatments, Cr existed mainly in trivalent state, resulting in obviously lower concentrations.

Figure 5(d) shows the As leaching concentrations in T6–T10. Different from other heavy metals, with the enhancement of the extractant oxidizability, the concentrations of As decreased gradually. The highest leaching concentrations of As appeared at T6, which was 0.0011 mg/L, and was 63.6%, 45.5% and 36.4% higher than that in T7, T9, T8, respectively, and it's worth noting that no free state of As was detected in T10. In natural conditions, trivalent As and pentavalent As are two main states. Similarly, the mobility of As also depends on its binding state. In the reducing or anaerobic environment, Arsenic mainly exists as trivalent state, while in the strongly oxidizing water, arsenic mainly exists as pentavalent state. As(III) is much easier to migrate than As(V) in solutions. It has been demonstrated that Fe(III) and As(V) can form the complex coprecipitations in the acidic oxidation conditions (the coprecipitation with ferric (Fe(III)) iron has been specified by U.S. EPA as the best available technology (BDAT) for the removal of As (Min et al. 2015)). Scorodite (FeAsO4·2H2O), ferric arsenate and arsenical ferrihydrite are the common precipitates formed during As removal in the metallurgical industries. The highly crystalline scorodite is more advantageous owing to the low ferric demand, high density and stability. The reaction can be expressed as:
(3)

As was almost in hexavalent state in T10, which could form stable precipitates with ferric iron in the leachate, thus, free state of As could not be detected.

Leaching characteristics of F in different redox environments

Figure 6 shows the leaching characteristics of F under different redox environments. The leaching concentrations of F in T6–T8 were 0.93 and 17.74 mg/L, respectively, and no free fluorine was detected in T9 and T10. The stronger the oxidizability of the leachate, the higher the F concentration was. It is known that in the presence of Ca2+, the concentration of F is closely related to pH value. The leachate of T6-T8 were neutral, only in the neutral environment, the activity of Ca2+ is high, due to which F led to the most stable form of precipitation, thus resulting in low concentration of F, while in T9 and T10, F easily migrated in the acid-oxidizing environments, showing significantly higher concentrations.

Figure 6

The leaching concentrations of F under different redox potentials.

Figure 6

The leaching concentrations of F under different redox potentials.

Close modal

Analysis of the influence of redox environment on the release of pollutants by RMFM

From the leaching test results, it is obvious that the RMFM samples underwent a typical oxidation acid production process in the oxidizing environments, for which the leachates resulted in low pH and high Eh. Except for As, which formed stable precipitates with Fe(III) under the strong acid-oxidizing conditions, the other polluting elements could be dissolved largely from RMFM. As a result, the oxidation environment was confirmed to enable an enhanced extent of pollutant release from RMFM.

By comparison, the concentrations of polluting ions in the reducing environment were significantly lower, exhibiting the potential to control the release of the pollutants. This may be related to the high content of the dissolved organic matter, anaerobic microorganisms and partial phosphate resulting due to the degradation of the organic matter in the anaerobic environment. On the one hand, the soluble organic matter in the reducing extractant could make the surrounding environment anoxic due to the self-oxidation under the action of the anaerobic microorganisms, thus, weakening the oxidation ability to produce acid, while the relatively high pH does not lead to the dissolution and destruction of the cementitious materials. On the other hand, RMFM contains a large amount of Al and Fe, which could be precipitated in the phosphate form with a very low solubility, and the formed colloids exhibit a specific adsorption or co-precipitation effect on the soluble ions. In addition, the organic matter in the reducing extractant could significantly affect the migration of the metal ions, such as Fe and Mn, by the formation of complexes (complexation or chelation) as well as the number and permeability of ions (through microfiltration membranes) in the solution. As a consequence, the leachates under reducing treatment had lower contaminants.

Solidification analysis of heavy metal by RMFM in goaf water

Static immersion with goaf water as solvent

To simulate the use of RMFM under actual condition, the cylindrical samples were statically immersed in goaf water. The ion concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F leached from the cylindrical RMFM samples within 14 d are shown in Table 5.

Table 5

The concentrations (mg/L) of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F leached from the cylindrical RMFM samples in goaf water as a function of time

Time (h)8122472168336
Cu 4.58 4.57 4.54 4.25 4.11 4.08 
Pb 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.65 
Cr 0.0085 0.0095 0.0093 0.0088 0.0085 0.008 
As 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.012 
F 5.046 5.055 5.033 4.951 4.753 4.72 
Time (h)8122472168336
Cu 4.58 4.57 4.54 4.25 4.11 4.08 
Pb 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.65 
Cr 0.0085 0.0095 0.0093 0.0088 0.0085 0.008 
As 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.012 
F 5.046 5.055 5.033 4.951 4.753 4.72 

As shown in Figure 7, with the increase of soaking time, the ion concentration of each pollutant had no significant change at the beginning. After soaking for 72 h, the concentrations began to decrease, but the trends were not pronounced. Through the components detection of goaf water, it can be found that the goaf water itself contained a variety of pollutants. By contrast, the concentrations of pollutant elements released by RMFM samples were negligible. As the soaking time went on, partial geopolymer gels near the surfaces of the samples were gradually corroded and dissolved, resulting in the increase of the permeability, and the internal hydrates came into contact with goaf water, then a small amount of polluting elements were stabilized/solidified by physical and chemical reactions. Thus contaminated elements concentrations decreased slowly, and gradually came to stability over time.

Figure 7

The concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F in goaf water as a function of time.

Figure 7

The concentrations of Cu, Pb, Cr, As and F in goaf water as a function of time.

Close modal

Solidification test of heavy metals in goaf water by RMFM

Table 6 shows the comparison of the Cu, Pb and As concentrations of the unmodified red mud and RMFM powder samples in goaf water after continuously oscillated for 8 h.

Table 6

The pH and concentrations of Cu, Pb and As after treating by unmodified red mud and RMFM powder samples within different reaction time (the data in parentheses are the removal rates of heavy metals)

Leaching time (h)Detection
pH valueCuPbAs
Unmodified red mud 9.87 18.1 0.381 0.21 
RMFM 6.58 0.0753
(98.51) 
0.0659
(92.06) 
0.0010
(92.31) 
6.73 0.0655
(98.71) 
0.0412
(95.04) 
0.0008
(93.85) 
7.03 0.0452
(99.11) 
0.0378
(95.45) 
0.0005
(96.15) 
7.21 0.0335
(99.34) 
0.0311
(96.25) 
0.0005
(96.15) 
Leaching time (h)Detection
pH valueCuPbAs
Unmodified red mud 9.87 18.1 0.381 0.21 
RMFM 6.58 0.0753
(98.51) 
0.0659
(92.06) 
0.0010
(92.31) 
6.73 0.0655
(98.71) 
0.0412
(95.04) 
0.0008
(93.85) 
7.03 0.0452
(99.11) 
0.0378
(95.45) 
0.0005
(96.15) 
7.21 0.0335
(99.34) 
0.0311
(96.25) 
0.0005
(96.15) 

As can be seen from Table 6, but rather than stabilize/solidify the heavy metals in the goaf water, the unmodified red mud released its own pollutants into the surroundings, resulting in secondary pollution. Meanwhile, due to the high alkalinity of red mud, the pH value of the goaf water after reaction exceeded its limit in groundwater (6.5–8.5), showing as alkaline.

By comparison, the powder RMFM samples had significant treatment effect on goaf water. After reaction for 8 h, the pH value of the leachate met the Class I of standard for groundwater quality (GB/T14848-2017), and heavy metals had also been effectively solidified. With the prolonging of reaction time, the concentrations of the heavy metals gradually decreased, and the removal efficiency gradually increased. After leaching, the removal rates of Cu, Pb, and As reached 99.34%, 96.25% and 96.15%, respectively.

The test results show that the adsorption capacity of unmodified red mud is devoid, so it can hardly be directly used to treat wastewater containing heavy metals. Thus it can be seen that red mud needs to be modified or blended with aluminosilicate powder with pozzolanic activity to produce geopolymer cementitious materials, only then could effectively treat coal mine wastewater. Compared with the unmodified red mud, the alkali-activated cementitious material RMFM could stabilize/solidify heavy metals effectively in goaf water due to its special hydration process and hydration products.

  • (1)

    Based on the combined actions of alkali and sulfate activation, RMFM's special hydration process and hydration products make it stabilize/solidify heavy metal ions effectively. These hydration products such as C-S-H, C-A-H and AFt overlapped with each other, filled and interspersed in the pores of the material, reducing the porosity and improving the density of the material, showing effective solidification performance macroscopically. The solidification mechanisms of heavy metals by RMFM mainly include physical adsorption, encapsulation, and chemical reaction as well as ion exchange.

  • (2)

    The leaching tests of RMFM at different pH show that the acidic substances could dissolve a part of the polymer gels and damage the density of the system, thus, affecting the solidification performance of RMFM, while the alkaline environment could enhance the degree of alkali activation of the system and produce an enhanced extent of hydration products, thus, improving the ability of the material to immobilize the pollutants to a certain extent. It can be noted that even in the most acidic treatment T1 (pH = 2.33), the leaching concentrations of the heavy metals were still at low levels (<0.15 mg/L, all at trace levels).

  • (3)

    Through the leaching tests of RMFM under different redox conditions, it can be found that the concentrations of the polluting elements in the reducing environments were much lower than those in oxidizing environments. The RMFM samples underwent a typical oxidation acid forming process in the oxidizing environment. The stronger was the oxidizability, the higher was the acidity, which led to the more release of the pollutants from RMFM, while the reducing environments exhibit the potential to effectively control the release of the pollutants.

  • (4)

    The static immersion test shows that RMFM could effectively stabilize its own pollutants and would not cause secondary pollution to the surroundings when in the possible exposure environment. In addition, the solidification test in goaf water shows that RMFM powder had significant removal effects on heavy metals. After continuous oscillation for 8 h, the removal rates of Cu, Pb, and As all reached more than 96.15%, providing new ideas for comprehensive treatment of mined-out area.

The authors thank the Fundamental Research Funds of Taiyuan University of Technology (No. RZ18200030) and Shanxi YunQuan Geotechnical Engineering Technology Co. Ltd for supporting this project.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Fendorf
S. E.
1995
Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters
.
Geoderma
67
(
1–2
),
55
71
.
Garau
G.
,
Silvetti
M.
,
Deiana
S.
,
Deiana
P.
&
Castaldi
P.
2011
Long-term influence of red mud on As mobility and soil physico-chemical and microbial parameters in a polluted sub-acidic soil
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
185
(
2–3
),
1241
1248
.
Haibin
L.
&
Zhenling
L.
2010
Recycling utilization patterns of coal mining waste in China
.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
54
(
12
),
1331
1340
.
He
D.
,
Le
B. T.
,
Xiao
D.
,
Mao
Y.
,
Shan
F.
&
Ha
T. T. L.
2019
Coal mine area monitoring method by machine learning and multispectral remote sensing images
.
Infrared Physics & Technology
103
,
103070.1
.
Huang
W.
,
Wang
S.
,
Zhu
Z.
,
Li
L.
,
Yao
X.
,
Rudolph
V.
&
Haghseresht
F.
2008
Phosphate removal from wastewater using red mud
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
158
(
1
),
35
42
.
Jiang
G.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Siripornpibul
C.
,
Haryono
E.
,
Nguyen
N. X.
,
Oo
T.
,
Manzano
L. S. J.
,
Vongphachanh
S.
,
Kong
S.
&
Guo
F.
2020
The karst water environment in Southeast Asia: characteristics, challenges, and approaches
.
Hydrogeology Journal
29
(
1
),
123
135
.
Kesimal
A.
,
Yilmaz
E.
&
Ercikdi
B.
2004
Evaluation of paste backfill mixtures consisting of sulphide-rich mill tailings and varying cement contents
.
Cement and Concrete Research
34
(
10
),
1817
1822
.
Kumar
S.
,
Kumar
R.
&
Bandopadhyay
A.
2006
Innovative methodologies for the utilisation of wastes from metallurgical and allied industries
.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
48
(
4
),
301
314
.
Lazareva
E. V.
,
Myagkaya
I. N.
,
Kirichenko
I. S.
,
Gustaytis
M. A.
&
Zhmodik
S. M.
2019
Interaction of natural organic matter with acid mine drainage: In-situ accumulation of elements
.
Science of the Total Environment
660
,
468
483
.
Liu
W.
,
Chen
X.
,
Li
W.
,
Yu
Y.
&
Yan
K.
2014
Environmental assessment, management and utilization of red mud in China
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
84
,
606
610
.
Lu
R. R.
,
Zhang
Y. H.
,
Zhou
F. S.
&
Wang
X. K.
2012
Research of leaching alumina and iron oxide from Bayer Red Mud
.
Applied Mechanics and Materials
151
,
355
359
.
Min
X.-b.
,
Liao
Y.-p.
,
Chai
L.-y.
,
Yang
Z.-h.
,
Xiong
S.
,
Liu
L.
&
Li
Q.-z.
2015
Removal and stabilization of arsenic from anode slime by forming crystal scorodite
.
Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China
25
(
4
),
1298
1306
.
Provis
J. L.
2018
Alkali-activated materials
.
Cement and Concrete Research
114
,
40
48
.
Shanker
A. K.
,
Cervantes
C.
,
Loza-Tavera
H.
&
Avudainayagam
S.
2005
Chromium toxicity in plants
.
Environment International
31
(
5
),
739
753
.
Sun
W.
,
Wu
Q.
,
Dong
D.
&
Jiao
J.
2012
Avoiding coal–water conflicts during the development of China's large coal-producing regions
.
Mine Water and the Environment
31
(
1
),
74
78
.
Sun
W.
,
Wu
Q.
,
Liu
H.
&
Jiao
J.
2015
Prediction and assessment of the disturbances of the coal mining in Kailuan to karst groundwater system
.
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
89–90
,
136
144
.
Sutar
H.
2014
Progress of red mud utilization: an overview
.
American Chemical Science Journal
4
(
3
),
255
279
.
Tang
W. C.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Liu
Y.
&
Cui
H. Z.
2018
Influence of red mud on fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete
.
Construction and Building Materials
178
,
288
300
.
Tor
A.
,
Cengeloglu
Y.
,
Aydin
M. E.
&
Ersoz
M.
2006
Removal of phenol from aqueous phase by using neutralized red mud
.
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
300
(
2
),
498
503
.
Tor
A.
,
Danaoglu
N.
,
Arslan
G.
&
Cengeloglu
Y.
2009
Removal of fluoride from water by using granular red mud: batch and column studies
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
164
(
1
),
271
278
.
Xue
S. G.
,
Zhu
F.
,
Kong
X. F.
,
Wu
C.
,
Huang
L.
&
Huang
N.
2016
A review of the characterization and revegetation of bauxite residues (Red mud)
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
23
(
2
),
1120
1132
.
Yang
Y.
,
Wang
X.
,
Wang
M.
,
Wang
H.
&
Xian
P.
2016
Iron recovery from the leached solution of red mud through the application of oxalic acid
.
International Journal of Mineral Processing
157
,
145
151
.
Zhang
J.
,
Provis
J. L.
,
Feng
D.
&
van Deventer
J. S.
2008
Geopolymers for immobilization of Cr(6+), Cd(2+), and Pb(2+)
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
157
(
2–3
),
587
598
.
Zhang
M.
,
Zhao
M.
,
Zhang
G.
,
Mann
D.
,
Lumsden
K.
&
Tao
M.
2016
Durability of red mud-fly ash based geopolymer and leaching behavior of heavy metals in sulfuric acid solutions and deionized water
.
Construction and Building Materials
124
,
373
382
.
Zhang
S.
,
Ren
F.
,
Guo
Z.
,
Qiu
J.
&
Ding
H.
2020
Strength and deformation behavior of cemented foam backfill in sub-zero environment
.
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
9
(
4
),
9219
9231
.
Zhu
G.
,
Wu
X.
,
Ge
J.
,
Liu
F.
,
Zhao
W.
&
Wu
C.
2020
Influence of mining activities on groundwater hydrochemistry and heavy metal migration using a self-organizing map (SOM)
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
257
,
120664.1
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).