Oilfield-produced water is the primary by-product generated during oil and gas extraction operations. Oilfield-produced water is often severely toxic and poses substantial health, safety, and environmental issues; adequate treatment technologies can bring these streams to a quality level. Photocatalysis is a photochemical catalytic reaction that is a highly promising tool for environmental remediation due to its efficiency in mineralizing persistent and potentially toxic contaminants. However, there is limited understanding of its application to treat oilfield-produced water with a complex and highly variable water composition. This review article discusses the mechanisms and current state of heterogeneous photocatalytic systems for oilfield-produced water treatment, highlighting impediments to knowledge transfer, including the feasibility of practical applications and the identification of essential research requirements. Additionally, the effects of significant variables such as catalyst quantity, pH, organic compound concentration, light intensity, and wavelength are discussed in detail. Some solutions are proposed for scientists and engineers interested in advancing the development of industrial-scale photocatalytic water treatment technologies.

  • Photocatalytic AOPs can effectively remove recalcitrant organic pollutants from produced water.

  • Photocatalytic process should consider the bio-toxicity and environmental hazards associated with nanomaterials.

  • A disadvantage of large-scale application would be the incorrect choice of catalyst for pollutant degradation.

  • An ideal photocatalyst must encompass several features such as high surface area, effective light absorption, small particle size.

Advanced oxidation process (AOP), using photocatalytic oxidation, is gaining importance in the area of wastewater treatment (Gogate & Pandit 2004; Raut-Jadhav & Bagal 2020) since this process results in the degradation of pollutants with operation at mild conditions of temperature and most importantly sunlight or ultraviolet radiation for the generation of radicals capable of reacting with a wide range of priority pollutants. The advantages of photocatalytic water treatment over homogeneous-phase AOPs are well documented. For example, photocatalysis has been effectively used to degrade a wide range of organic compounds, including dyes (Dong 2015b; Shoneye et al. 2021) endocrine and mutagenic damaging chemicals (Al-Ghouti et al. 2019) and for degradation of pollutants in petroleum refinery wastewater (Rincon & Pulgarin 2004; Ani et al. 2018). Photocatalysis as a treatment system obviates the necessity for constant demand of precursor chemicals, which is a significant advantage for specific applications, especially those in isolated or resource-limited areas. This promise is reflected in a recent surge of scholarly publications on photocatalytic water treatment: over 5,500 results for papers from 2002 to 2021 (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Publications trends in photocatalytic water treatment research and produced water. Scopus results on photocatalytic water treatment from 2002 to 2021.

Figure 1

Publications trends in photocatalytic water treatment research and produced water. Scopus results on photocatalytic water treatment from 2002 to 2021.

Close modal

Despite extensive research during the last few years, photocatalysis applicability in produced water has been quite limited. In light of these facts, how might photocatalysis be efficiently scaled up or approved for oilfield-produced water treatment?

We examine the current state of heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalytic water treatment in this review, highlighting barriers to technology transfer, assessing the feasibility of practical applications, and identifying critical research needs for overcoming obstacles, in order to find answers to this question.

Mechanism and procedure for heterogeneous photocatalytic processes

Photocatalysis involves chemical transformations capable of completely decomposing nearly all organic molecules in the presence of a photocatalyst, solar, or Ultraviolet light energy (Bharagava 2020). As shown in Figure 2 and summarised from (Equations (1)–(5)), photocatalysts absorb energy equal to or above their bandgap energy when subjected to a UV light across the catalyst's surface. This exposure leads to the production of electrons and holes pairs in the conduction band and valence band (Equation (1)). The occurrence in photocatalytic processes requires the presence of water and dissolved oxygen, which gives room to the formation of reactive radicals.

Figure 2

Mechanism of photocatalysis.

Figure 2

Mechanism of photocatalysis.

Close modal

As shown in Figure 2, the electrons (e) that are excited by the light (photons) migrate from the valence band to the conduction band, leaving behind an empty unfilled valence band, and thus creating the electron-hole pair (h+) (Chong et al. 2010). If the catalyst is suspended in water, the electron-hole pair h+ at the valency band reacts with OH or H2O to form hydroxyl radical (OH), as shown in Equations (2) and (3).

Equation (4) illustrates the reaction at the conduction band. Here, O2 as an oxidizing agent accepts the photogenerated electron e to become reduced. The reduction of molecular oxygen O2 produces superoxide radicals O2•−.

Thus photogenerated reactive species O2•− and OH are mainly responsible for the degradation of the pollutants or mineralized to nontoxic states (Chong et al. 2010; Ala'a & Khraisheh 2015).

During the reaction process, challenges encountered include the recombination of the electrons and holes (Equation (5)), resulting in the emission of heat within nanoseconds that hinders the activeness of radicals and results in a low quantum yield (Dong et al. 2015b; Bloh 2019).
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

In water treatment, the degradation pathway of pollutants to final photocatalytic products involves some specific sequence of steps as depicted in the reaction procedure in Figure 2 (Su et al. 2008; Chong et al. 2010).

  • I.

    Mass transfer of reactants from the bulk fluid phase to the external surface of the solid photocatalyst through diffusion

  • II.

    Internal mass transfer of the reactants from the external surface of the photocatalyst through the pores to the surface of the photocatalyst and settling on an active site through adsorption

  • III.

    Adsorption of the organic contaminant(s) onto the photon activated surface (i.e. surface activation by photon energy occurs simultaneously in this step)

  • IV.

    Photocatalysis reaction for the adsorbed phase on the surface of the photocatalyst

  • V.

    Desorption of the final products (Product is released from the external surface of the photocatalyst to the fluid media)

  • VI.

    Internal counter diffusion of final products

  • VII.

    External counter diffusion.

Factors influencing photocatalytic reaction process

The oxidation rates and performance of the photocatalytic system are strongly reliant on some factors such as pH of the solution, light intensity, reaction time, wavelength, catalytic loading and concentration of pollutants (Loeb et al. 2018). Aside from the irradiation source, and the photocatalyst material, the photoreactor design has an impact on photocatalytic performance as measured by pollutant removal efficiency.

pH

pH is one of the most significant operational factors in heterogeneous photocatalytic water systems because it defines the organic compounds' chemistry (e.g. charge, acidity-pKa and partitioning coefficient) and it also affects the charge on the catalyst. Because of the nature of the semiconductor catalyst employed, any change in operational pH is reported to stimulate the isoelectric point or surface charge of the photocatalyst (Gnanaprakasam et al. 2015). Many reports have used the point of zero charge (PZC) to study the pH impact on the photocatalytic oxidation performance (Ochuma et al. 2007; Chong et al. 2009),. The PZC is a condition where the surface charge of photocatalyst is zero or neutral, that lies in the pH range of 4.5–7.0 depending on the catalysts used (Sacco et al. 2012; Chanu et al. 2019).

Catalytic loading

The amount of catalyst also affects photocatalytic degradation. The rate of photodegradation initially increased as the quantity of catalyst in the photocatalytic process increased. This may be explained by the fact that increasing the quantity of catalyst generally increases the number of active sites on the surface of the photocatalyst, resulting in an increase in the number of OH radicals formed, which can participate in the degradation of organic compounds that are present in the solution. Beyond a certain quantity of catalyst, the solution becomes turbid and so prevents UV rays for the reaction to continue, resulting in a decrease in percentage degradation (Coleman et al. 2007). As shown in Figure 3, in the absence of TiO2, no significant degradation was observed. The degradation rate increased with increasing catalyst loading until 0.7 gL−1, after which a decrease in degradation was observed. The reduction of photocatalytic activity at higher catalyst loading is attributed to the effects of light scattering and shielding by the suspended catalys (Jamali et al. 2013).

Figure 3

Effect of TiO2 catalyst loading on phenol degradation (Jamali et al. 2013).

Figure 3

Effect of TiO2 catalyst loading on phenol degradation (Jamali et al. 2013).

Close modal
Light wavelength

Depending on the kind of photocatalysts used, the photochemical impacts of light sources with various wavelength emission ranges will have a significant impact on the photocatalytic process (Molinari et al. 2020). UV light used in the process needs to have sufficient energy to promote electron hole formation (Ameta & Ameta 2018). The corresponding electromagnetic spectrum for UV irradiation is categorised as UV-A, UV-B, and UV-C, based on the wavelength of light that it emits. The UV-A range has its light wavelength range from 315 to 400 nm (3.10–3.94 eV). UV-B has wavelength range of 280–315 nm (3.94–4.43 eV) and the UV-C ranges from 100 to 280 nm (4.43–12.4 eV) (Janssens et al. 2019).

In most of the previous studies, the UV ranges from 254 nm to 315 nm and provides light photons sufficient for photonic activation of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO). TiO2 has a band gap with an optical absorption in the 310–400 nm-wavelength region, while CeO2 lies in the corresponding wavelengths of 388 nm (3.2 eV) and 381 nm (3.25 eV) respectively. ZnO with a wide band gap (Eg = 3.37 eV, corresponding to 387 nm) has unique electro optical properties and efficient UV absorptivity (Becheri et al. 2008; Rajendran et al. 2016; Ghamsari et al. 2017) However, some studies have used 253 nm during photocatalysis reaction (Lu et al. 2008; Ali et al. 2010).

Concentration of pollutants

A difference in the starting concentration of the water pollutants will result in a varied irradiation period required to accomplish full mineralization. Increased initial organic compound concentration affects photocatalyst degradation efficiency. It might be owing to an increase in the initial concentration of organic chemical, which resulted in more molecules being adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst. This results in a lack of available catalyst surface for the formation of hydroxyl radicals, lowering the photocatalytic activity of the catalyst.Additionally, increasing the initial concentration of organic compound lowers the quantity of photons arriving to the photocatalysis surface, hence decreasing the excitation of electrons from the valance band to the conduction band. Consequently, the photocatalytic activity of the produced photocatalyst is decreased.

Temperature

It was shown that an increase in photocatalytic reaction temperature (>80 °C) promoted the recombination of electron hole charges (Gaya & Abdullah 2008). Moreover, temperatures below 80 °C actually favour adsorption of contaminants on the TiO2 surface and operating at this temperature can reduce the heating capacity of water (Herrmann 2005). Li Puma & Yue (2002) reported that temperatures between 20–80 °C seem to be more effective for organic reactions with UV light (Li Puma & Yue 2002).

Light Intensity

When increased, light intensity results in much greater energy waste rather than degradation. The increase in light intensity also results in a significant rise in costs (Guozheng et al. 2010). A significant portion of light energy is lost so it is difficult to have an extensive application, when light intensity is not logically controlled, which is one of the most significant photocatalytic components. Light energy losses occur when the photon with less energy than threshold photon energy (hν0) is unable to ignite an electron–hole pair, and its energy is lost as heat hv<hν0 and when hv>hν0 is absorbed by a photocatalyst, hν0 energy is used to excite an electron–hole pair and the remaining energy hν − hν0 is lost as heat leading to energy waste (Yang & Liu 2007; Guozheng et al. 2010). It has been reported that sometimes the higher light intensity causes much more energy waste instead of much more degradation of organic compounds. It is critical to establish suitable light intensities in order to reduce energy losses caused by electron–hole recombination and to ensure similar values in all the measurements at different times (Dillert et al. 2013).

Reactor design

Photocatalytic reactors for water treatment can be categorised into those reactors using suspended photocatalyst particles and reactors where photocatalysts are immobilised on a continuous inert carrier as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Photocatalytic water treatment reactor designs (Loeb et al. 2018).

Figure 4

Photocatalytic water treatment reactor designs (Loeb et al. 2018).

Close modal

Photocatalytic reactors can run in batch, batch with recirculation, or continuous mode and their geometry should be designed to optimise the collection of light emitted by the selected sources (Cassano & Alfano 2000). According to Pareek et al. (2008), the most critical parameters to consider when designing a photocatalytic reactor are the total irradiation surface area of the catalyst per unit volume and the light dispersion inside the reactor.

Recent studies by Enesca (2021) reported that using the inappropriate photoreactor design may significantly increase energy consumption, improperly distribute photons, or cause the catalyst to deactivate, all of which have an adverse effect on photocatalytic efficiency. Thus the main obstacle in the development of highly efficient photocatalytic reactors is the establishment of effective reactor designs for intermediate and large-scale use, as demanded for the purpose of industrial or commercial applications (Abhang et al. 2011). A scale-up for industrial applications will offer opportunities to increase the performance of photocatalytic water treatment systems through improved reactor design. The importance of additional research in the areas of reactor design have been emphasised by (Chong et al. 2010; Loeb et al. 2018). They concluded that the relatively slow translation of photocatalytic research to industrial practise is most likely due to the difficulty of large-scale system design, which is frequently overlooked at the bench scale. Thus, large-scale photocatalytic treatment process with high efficacy can be achieved through rapid evaluation of different possible pilot plant configurations. According to Hossain (2018) a compact photocatalytic reactor will enable efficient decomposition of organic compounds in a liquid or gas phase, incorporating a flexible and light-dispersive capacity (Hossain 2018).

Challenges and prospects for photocatalytic application in water treatment

The photocatalytic process has shown significant promise as a low-cost, ecologically friendly, and sustainable treatment method that is compatible with the water/wastewater industry's ‘zero’ waste policy. This advanced oxidation technology's effectiveness to eliminate persistent organic contaminants and microorganisms in wastewater has been extensively proven. Table 1 gives an overview of the organic compounds treated, the conditions of the catalytic process, as well as the new advances in this technology for each study.

Table 1

Overview of articles on the application of photocatalytisis

Class contaminantsTarget compoundHighlights on experimental processes and findingsReference
Dye pollutants Methyl orange dye Bi2O3/CoFe2O4 heterojunctions have shown a high efficiency for decomposing organic dye under light irradiation.The nanocomposite with 1:1 Bi2O3/CoFe2O4 composition showed the highest photodegradation efficiency. The Bi2O3/CoFe24 is environmentally friendly, the synthesis is simple, and, if it were scaled up, the manufacturing cost would be low Further studies on photocatalytic activities against other dye/drug pollutants and its water splitting potential are necessary Naveed et al. (2021)  
Phenolic compound Phenol Photodegradation can be used for complete mineralization of phenol. Experimental results showed that under optimized conditions the phenol removal efficiency was 98 and 100% for the TiO2/UV and TiO2/UV/H2O2 system Saadati et al. (2016)  
Dye pollutants Methylene blue and Malachite green ZnO NPs degraded 94 and 92% of methylene blue (MB)and malachite green(MG), respectively. The biosynthesized ZnO NPs proved an effective antibacterial agent and photocatalyst Vasantharaj et al. (2021)  
Aromatic and aliphatic chlorocompounds 4Chlorophenol,chlorobenzene,1,4-dicholorobenzene and benzene. Wide variety of aromatic and aliphatic chlorocompounds as contaminants present in water can quench the fluorescence from ZnO-nano. The effectiveness of this catalyst should be examined in degrading real industrial effluents, in which numerous organic contaminants are present. Hariharan (2006)  
Dye pollutants Methylene blue There is a highly nonlinear behaviour of the catalyst properties and their adsorption efficiencies. These results give some insight into the limiting factors in the thin film technique for photocatalysis. Gupta et al. (2015)  
Dye pollutants  Methyl Orange There are presently no ways of producing graphene derivatives in huge amounts which are scalable and affordable despite their remarkable applicability. The synthesis and design of the new graphene-based nanocomposites for photocatalyst still require integral thinking. Jamjoum et al. (2021)  
Aromatic compunds Phenol Prolonged lifetime of photogenerated charges over the C-TiO2 NPs caused the formation of the larger amount of OH with strong oxidizing power for the phenol degradation.The findings show the new prospect for designing an efficient visible light-responsive nano-photocatalytic material Yu et al. (2014)  
Dye pollutants Methylene blue (MB) Titanium oxide coupled with bismuth oxide (TiO2/Bi2O3) nanocomposite was synthesized by seed extract of Sapindus mukorossi. TiO2/Bi2O3 showed maximum degradation (MB: 94% and BPA: 91%) at a minimum concentration of pollutant (50 mgL−1) with catalyst amount (35 mg), neutral pH and reduces half-life of pollutants (BPA: 1 h, MB: 0.5 h) Rani & Shanker (2021)  
Chromophoric dye derivatives AY-29, CBBG-250 and AG-25 Rare earth metal doped bismuth oxide with different chromophoric dye derivatives, such as AY-29, CBBG-250 and AG-25 in aqueous suspension (Bi2O3). The enhancement in the photocatalytic activity are attributed to the reduction rate of electron-hole recombination leading to higher charge separation Raza et al. (2018)  
Aromatic compounds Benzene, toluene and xylene Mn-TiO2 showed superior BTX removal efficiency under UV and visible irradiation in the presence of O2. The conversion percentage of benzene, toluene, and xylene to CO2 were 63.6%, 56.4%, 51.8%, and to CO 29%, 26.5%, 23.2%, respectively Binas et al. (2019)  
Aromatic compounds Benzene, toluene and xylene ethylbenzene  Investigation of photocatalytic degradation of BTEX by ZnO nanorods as visible light photocatalyst exhibited formation of benzyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, phenol and benzoic acid as intermediate byproducts Al-Sabahi et al. (2017)  
Aromatic compounds Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m, p-xylene and o-xylene At steady-state operation, above 79, 79, 99, 98, and 98% removal efficiencies were achieved for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m, p-xylene and o-xylene, respectively, under optimal conditions (2.0 U mf of superficial gas velocity and 1.43 of height/diameter ratio). The experimental results can lead to the development of an efficient photocatalytic treatment system that utilizes solar energy and TiO2/SiO2 photocatalysts Park et al. (2011)  
Pharmaceuticals Tetracycline Compound was resistant to photolysis. Photocatalysis over 0.5 g/l TiO2 suspension showed rapid rate of degradation. The irradiated solution inhibits the activity of microorganisms Reyes et al. (2006)  
Carboxylic acids Phenoxy acetic acid and 2,4,5-phenoxyacetic acid The effect of pH, catalyst, BrO3− and H2O2 to degradation was significant in all cases. Degussa P-25 was a more efficient photocatalyst than Hombicat UV 100, Millenium Inorganic PC500 and Travancore Singh et al. (2007)  
Isoproturon Herbicides Degradation rate over Degussa TiO2 was faster than Hombicat 100 and was increased by the addition of electron acceptors. Degradation was slower under solar illumination Haque & Muneer (2003)  
Toxic aquatic pollutants Cr(VI) and bisphenol A This study shows the better degradation over Cr(VI) and BPA pollutants. At pH 2 and 5.64, Cr(VI) and BPA pollutants were degraded Santhosh et al. (2018)  
Pesticides Pesticides in aqueous solutions This study demonstrated that the photocatalytic processes are promising for the degradation of pesticides from aqueous solutions using photocatalyst includingTiO2/Fe2O3/UV,rGO/Fe3O4/ZnO. However, further studies suggested meeting key criteria such as cost-effectiveness, reactor design, and treatment of real effluents (Yeganeh et al. (2021)  
Class contaminantsTarget compoundHighlights on experimental processes and findingsReference
Dye pollutants Methyl orange dye Bi2O3/CoFe2O4 heterojunctions have shown a high efficiency for decomposing organic dye under light irradiation.The nanocomposite with 1:1 Bi2O3/CoFe2O4 composition showed the highest photodegradation efficiency. The Bi2O3/CoFe24 is environmentally friendly, the synthesis is simple, and, if it were scaled up, the manufacturing cost would be low Further studies on photocatalytic activities against other dye/drug pollutants and its water splitting potential are necessary Naveed et al. (2021)  
Phenolic compound Phenol Photodegradation can be used for complete mineralization of phenol. Experimental results showed that under optimized conditions the phenol removal efficiency was 98 and 100% for the TiO2/UV and TiO2/UV/H2O2 system Saadati et al. (2016)  
Dye pollutants Methylene blue and Malachite green ZnO NPs degraded 94 and 92% of methylene blue (MB)and malachite green(MG), respectively. The biosynthesized ZnO NPs proved an effective antibacterial agent and photocatalyst Vasantharaj et al. (2021)  
Aromatic and aliphatic chlorocompounds 4Chlorophenol,chlorobenzene,1,4-dicholorobenzene and benzene. Wide variety of aromatic and aliphatic chlorocompounds as contaminants present in water can quench the fluorescence from ZnO-nano. The effectiveness of this catalyst should be examined in degrading real industrial effluents, in which numerous organic contaminants are present. Hariharan (2006)  
Dye pollutants Methylene blue There is a highly nonlinear behaviour of the catalyst properties and their adsorption efficiencies. These results give some insight into the limiting factors in the thin film technique for photocatalysis. Gupta et al. (2015)  
Dye pollutants  Methyl Orange There are presently no ways of producing graphene derivatives in huge amounts which are scalable and affordable despite their remarkable applicability. The synthesis and design of the new graphene-based nanocomposites for photocatalyst still require integral thinking. Jamjoum et al. (2021)  
Aromatic compunds Phenol Prolonged lifetime of photogenerated charges over the C-TiO2 NPs caused the formation of the larger amount of OH with strong oxidizing power for the phenol degradation.The findings show the new prospect for designing an efficient visible light-responsive nano-photocatalytic material Yu et al. (2014)  
Dye pollutants Methylene blue (MB) Titanium oxide coupled with bismuth oxide (TiO2/Bi2O3) nanocomposite was synthesized by seed extract of Sapindus mukorossi. TiO2/Bi2O3 showed maximum degradation (MB: 94% and BPA: 91%) at a minimum concentration of pollutant (50 mgL−1) with catalyst amount (35 mg), neutral pH and reduces half-life of pollutants (BPA: 1 h, MB: 0.5 h) Rani & Shanker (2021)  
Chromophoric dye derivatives AY-29, CBBG-250 and AG-25 Rare earth metal doped bismuth oxide with different chromophoric dye derivatives, such as AY-29, CBBG-250 and AG-25 in aqueous suspension (Bi2O3). The enhancement in the photocatalytic activity are attributed to the reduction rate of electron-hole recombination leading to higher charge separation Raza et al. (2018)  
Aromatic compounds Benzene, toluene and xylene Mn-TiO2 showed superior BTX removal efficiency under UV and visible irradiation in the presence of O2. The conversion percentage of benzene, toluene, and xylene to CO2 were 63.6%, 56.4%, 51.8%, and to CO 29%, 26.5%, 23.2%, respectively Binas et al. (2019)  
Aromatic compounds Benzene, toluene and xylene ethylbenzene  Investigation of photocatalytic degradation of BTEX by ZnO nanorods as visible light photocatalyst exhibited formation of benzyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, phenol and benzoic acid as intermediate byproducts Al-Sabahi et al. (2017)  
Aromatic compounds Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m, p-xylene and o-xylene At steady-state operation, above 79, 79, 99, 98, and 98% removal efficiencies were achieved for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m, p-xylene and o-xylene, respectively, under optimal conditions (2.0 U mf of superficial gas velocity and 1.43 of height/diameter ratio). The experimental results can lead to the development of an efficient photocatalytic treatment system that utilizes solar energy and TiO2/SiO2 photocatalysts Park et al. (2011)  
Pharmaceuticals Tetracycline Compound was resistant to photolysis. Photocatalysis over 0.5 g/l TiO2 suspension showed rapid rate of degradation. The irradiated solution inhibits the activity of microorganisms Reyes et al. (2006)  
Carboxylic acids Phenoxy acetic acid and 2,4,5-phenoxyacetic acid The effect of pH, catalyst, BrO3− and H2O2 to degradation was significant in all cases. Degussa P-25 was a more efficient photocatalyst than Hombicat UV 100, Millenium Inorganic PC500 and Travancore Singh et al. (2007)  
Isoproturon Herbicides Degradation rate over Degussa TiO2 was faster than Hombicat 100 and was increased by the addition of electron acceptors. Degradation was slower under solar illumination Haque & Muneer (2003)  
Toxic aquatic pollutants Cr(VI) and bisphenol A This study shows the better degradation over Cr(VI) and BPA pollutants. At pH 2 and 5.64, Cr(VI) and BPA pollutants were degraded Santhosh et al. (2018)  
Pesticides Pesticides in aqueous solutions This study demonstrated that the photocatalytic processes are promising for the degradation of pesticides from aqueous solutions using photocatalyst includingTiO2/Fe2O3/UV,rGO/Fe3O4/ZnO. However, further studies suggested meeting key criteria such as cost-effectiveness, reactor design, and treatment of real effluents (Yeganeh et al. (2021)  

However, the application of photocatalysis systems to water treatment is limited by some technical problems that need further research (Foteinis & Chatzisymeon 2020).

According to Lin et al. (2020), the relatively slow transfer of photocatalysis treatment techniques from bench to industrial scale is likely due to the system's design currently used in water treatment; another key challenge identified as a constraint for photocatalysis application is the treatment scope for contaminants.

That being said, Kang et al. (2019) reported a poor quantum yield due to the very effective recombination processes acting in the bulk solid and at the solid/electrolyte interface using UV-irradiated semiconductors (Kang et al. 2019). Also Jiang et al. (2021) reported that obtaining selective oxidation of the target pollutant or pollutants in the presence of other oxidizable organic substrates is relatively complex, which has become a major set back for photoctalysis systems.

Selectivity is the oxidants’ capacity to distinguish between the multiple compounds present in solution (in heterogeneous photocatalytic reactions, h+ vb and OH). For example, recent reports had shown that it is challenging to oxidize benzene or other BTEX chemicals selectively in the presence of a high concentration of DOM (dissolved organic matter) (Coha et al. 2021; Giannakis et al. 2021; Marco et al. 2021).

In terms of intermediates produced during treatment not many studies have reported the management or handling of these compounds; in reality these intermediates may be more dangerous to humans and the environment in the short run (Jamjoum et al. 2021).

Evaluation of photocatalytic treatment systems and oilfield produced water

A photocatalytic treatment process can be more efficient in the removal of organics from oilfield-produced water. The most mature and feasible processes, such as ozonation and Fenton, are also associated with lower efficiency in oilfield-produced water. This assessment was based on the comprehensive report by Coha et al. (2021), who classified the various AOPs based on their current developmental stage.

A search of the Scopus database using the keywords ‘produced water’ and ‘photocatalysis’ indicated that there were fewer than 90 peer-reviewed articles on the subject (Figure 1). Thus applications of photocatalysis techniques to treat oilfield-produced water and, more specifically, aromatic and polyaromatic compounds are still under-studied (Ani et al. 2018).

In environmental remediation, limited reports depict the use of photocatalytic studies for the simultaneous degradation of organic compounds such as BTEX, PAHs, and phenols, contained in OPW and co-existing together, although research in the literature shows that petroleum wastewaters have been studied using a heterogeneous photocatalysis method (Table 1). Nevertheless, most of the studies have primarily focused on the degradation of a single pollutant (Jain et al. 2007; Mu et al. 2017).

However, wastewater on an industrial scale contains a mixture of organic and inorganic compounds in different classifications co-existing, such as produced water during oil and gas extraction. Scaling up from laboratory to industrial-scale applications will require additional scientific research, including the fabrication and modification of semiconducting photocatalysts and the treatment of multiple pollutants, as well as process optimization studies to reduce the cost of treatment, as conceptualized in Figure 5.

Figure 5

Contextualization of photocatalytic system development.

Figure 5

Contextualization of photocatalytic system development.

Close modal

Hong et al. (2018) investigated the degradation of biocides, such as Glutaraldehyde (GA), considered one of the most harmful contaminants in produced water, which restricts biological activities, making biological treatment a non-viable alternative for produced water treatment. GA was treated under ultraviolet (UV) irradiation with removal efficiency ranging from 52 to 85% within one hour irradiation (Hong et al. 2018). Also, in the study carried out by Andreozzi et al. (2018), linear plot of ln(C/Co) versus the treatment time for the organic constituents of saline produced water in presence of reduced graphene oxide/titania rGO(10%)/TiO2-P25 shows that organic constituents removal was influenced by the rGO/TiO2 weight ratio. Among rGO/TiO2-P25 photocatalysts with different weight ratios (1, 5, 10 and 20%), the highest photocatalytic efficiency was achived with a ratio of 10:1, as depicted in Figure 6.

Figure 6

Plot of Ln(C/Co) vs time with 500 mg/L rGO(10%)/TiO2-P25 load: (Andreozzi et al. 2018).

Figure 6

Plot of Ln(C/Co) vs time with 500 mg/L rGO(10%)/TiO2-P25 load: (Andreozzi et al. 2018).

Close modal

The photocatalytic reaction rates increase as follows: acetic acid < phenols < naphthalene < xylenes < toluene (Andreozzi et al. 2018).

Sheikholeslami et al. (2018) studied the removal efficiency of BTEX compounds using γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. At the optimal catalyst concentration of 150 mg/L and pH 3, a 97% decrease in COD was achieved after 90 min of irradiation. Thus optimizing the three principal independent parameters, as depicteded in Figure 7, can have significant impact on BTEX removal.

Figure 7

The nexus between pH, light intensity, catalyst concentration and BTEX removal (Sheikholeslami et al. 2018).

Figure 7

The nexus between pH, light intensity, catalyst concentration and BTEX removal (Sheikholeslami et al. 2018).

Close modal

Photocatalysis experiments were also performed to test the influence of the wavelength and intensity. Jimenez et al. (2019) reported a low removal of phenol with 50% degradation; results show that the configuration and geometry of the equipment can affect the profit of the light. Taghizadeh et al. (2020), using a combination of forward osmosis and photocatalyst system for simultaneous salt removal and treatment of produced water, demonstrated that benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) removal efficiency in the cellulose triacetate with TiO2 and TiO2/GO membrane under UVC radiation was 62 and 78% (Figure 8), respectively. Results show that the use of TiO2 and TiO2/GO membranes significantly improved the permeability, water flux, and photocatalytic degradation of pollutants and desalination of produced water.The result for CT (cellulose triacetate) and CTG membranes in comparison with the C membrane showed that the presence of TiO2 and GO nanoparticles improved the permeability, increased hydrophilicity and enhanced the FO efficiency. Furthermore, the best BTEX removal efficiency obtained was 80% in membrane CTG under visible light.

Figure 8

BTEX compounds removal efficiency by membranes CT and CTG (Taghizadeh et al. 2020).

Figure 8

BTEX compounds removal efficiency by membranes CT and CTG (Taghizadeh et al. 2020).

Close modal

Photocatalytst application and challenges

There is a direct correlation between organic pollutant and surface coverage of photocatalyst (Dong et al. 2015b) as organic pollutants that can attach properly to the photocatalyst surface, are more likely to be oxidized directly. The photo-induced transfer of electrons that take place with adsorbed species over semiconductor photocatalyst depends on the band gap energy of the semiconductor (Kang et al. 2019) and so the activation energy must be enough to transfer electrons from the valence band to the conduction band (Schneider et al. 2014).

Figure 9 displays the bandgap energy (Ebg) for the photoexcitation of different photocatalysts. However, besides band gap, other factors play an important role in photocatalytic reactions; as the advancement of photocatalytic technology in the water treatment sector will require the use of a photocatalyst exhibiting some ideal features such as high adsorption and surface area, light absorption, efficient charge separation and high mobility of charge carriers.

Figure 9

Band gap energies of various semiconductor photocatalysts (Tamirat et al. 2016).

Figure 9

Band gap energies of various semiconductor photocatalysts (Tamirat et al. 2016).

Close modal

Different authors (Zhou et al. 2012; Neaţu et al. 2014) agree about the main factors of an ideal photocatalyst: for instance, the size and shape of the catalyst influence its surface structure, including its adsorption capacity, then resulting in varying photocatalytic performance (Rani et al. 2018; Li et al. 2020a). Also, the crystallite size of a catalyst plays an important role in the photocatalytic process, as photo reactivity can be enhanced by improving the crystallinity. Because adsorption of pollutants is a key phase, the surface area of the photocatalysts materials, also has a significant impact on photocatalytic activity. Thus, a large surface area contains more active sites and displays improved photocatalytic activity (Tian et al. 2014).

Silva et al.(2019) used real samples of OPW collected from an oil company located in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. The photocatalytic processes were effective for the removal of dissolved organic matter in OPW. The best treatment was at pH 7, this was attributed to the calcination effect on the photocatalyst during treatment. Thus an increase in the kinetic energy of reaction results in a higher oxidation rate of phenol.

Andreozzi et al. (2018) reported that titania coupled with reduced graphene oxide shows higher activity than bare TiO2 nanoparticles for reducing the TOC of saline produced water (SPW). The higher photoactivity of rGO/TiO2-HM pristine TiO2-HM compared to commercial bare P25 can be related to the specific surface area of rGO/TiO2-HM, which is three times higher than TiO2-P25. On the other hand, the differences in shape, phase and particle size demonstrated to play a role in the photoactivity of these materials.

Other studies carried out for treating produced water by photocatalytic processes demonstrated that high rate of photogenerated (e and h+) recombination, poor adsorption capacity of pollutants and high concentration of chloride ions in SPW compete with organic substrates and reduce the effect of pristine TiO2, which is frequently associated with low efficiency and a lack of reduction in the toxicity of treated SPW (Santos et al. 2006; Li et al. 2007; Gouma & Lee 2014). Also a more crystalized photocatalyst is capable of re-positioning light-generated carriers to its originated state thereby preventing recombination (Kim & Kwak 2007) and on some occasions more energy can be absorbed (Marotti et al. 2006). The surface charge properties of the photocatalyst under acidic or alkaline conditions can result in a higher oxidizing activity at lower pH but excess H+ at very low pH can decrease reaction rate (Horvath 2003; Sun et al. 2006).

Furthermore, a study conducted by Marzouk et al. (2021) shows that dip-coated commercial TiO2 membranes with different concentrations of SiO2 (Figure 10) were tested for oil rejection from raw PW. The TOC content in the SPW filtered through Mu was as low as 28 mg/l giving a removal efficiency of 72%. However, futher enhancement with SiO2, reported 89, 91, 90 and 87% for membrane (M1, M2, M3 and M4); respectively,which can be attributed to the pore size of the membranes within the NF range.

Figure 10

Raw produced water treated using pristine TiO2 and TiO2/SiO2 coated membranes (Marzouk et al. 2021).

Figure 10

Raw produced water treated using pristine TiO2 and TiO2/SiO2 coated membranes (Marzouk et al. 2021).

Close modal

Research has also been performed to incorporate photocatalysts into inert substrates, such as glass or polymers, most notably to resolve post-treatment catalysts recovery problems. Liu et al.(2016) compared the removal efficiency of naphthalene in real offshore PW achieved by the catalyst suspended or immobilized on glass slides. Even if naphthalene reduction after 12 h was around 85%, immobilized TiO2 promoted a larger removal rate, mainly due to a much lower increase in system turbidity upon catalyst addition.

Modification routes towards enhancing the photoactivity of photocatalyst materials

Various modification routes exist, such as doping, thermal treatment and optimisation of application process towards augmenting or improving the optical and material response (performance) of photocatalysts.

The justification for using these material engineering methods is to maximize rates of the photocatalytic reaction by introducing electron acceptors or changing the catalyst shape and composition through different mechanisms, as reported by (Chong et al. 2010). Metallic materials such as copper (Cu), tin (Sn), nickel (Ni), platinum (Pt), gold (Au), silver (Ag) and Vanadium (V) may elicit an appropriate bandgap change and stimulate effective degradation.

For instance, Gao et al. (2015) studied the effect of metal ion-doping on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 for rhodamine B removal. Ag+, Al3+, Mn2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ were investigated. Results show that Zn2+ could exhibit an excellent photocatalytic reduction efficiency because of the effects of the weight fractions of the anatase phase, SBET, and band gap (Eg). The use of Mn2+ and Ni2+ as dopants decreased photocatalytic activity.

The application of non-metal dopants such as fluorine nitrogen, sulphur, and carbon (F, C,S, N and P) can enhance the photoactivity and feasibility of catalysts for industrial application through the introduction of impurites in the bandgap of photocatalyst and thus, reduce the photonic energy requirements, narrowing the bandgap and promoting the adsorption between photocatalyst and pollutants, increase conductivity within photocatalyst and the mobility of charge carriers (Fujishima et al. 2008; Niu et al. 2018). The choice of phosphorus as a dopant allows the possibility of both cationic (P5+) and anionic (P3−) doping of anatase TiO2 (Yu et al. 2003) and there are several reports on high activity of P-doped TiO2 nanoparticles (Gopal et al. 2012). Ganesh (2017) studied the influences of solution pH, band-gap energy, structural, surface and photocatalytic characteristics of different amounts of P-doped TiO2 nano-powders. Result shows that 1 wt.% P-doped TiO2 nano-powder calcined at 400 °C exhibits the highest rate of reaction for photocatalytic methylene blue (MB) degradation (Ganesh, 2017). P-doped TiO2 nano-powder photocatalysts prefer a solution pH of 5.5 for improved activity in the MB degradation reaction. Nitrogen as a dopant has numerous potentials. Nitrogen doping improves optical absorption and photocatalytic degradation capability significantly (Ansari et al. 2016).

Photocatalyst types and environmental impact

According to prior research, the effectiveness of photocatalysts in degrading environmental pollutants is influenced by variables such as the photocatalyst type and the influence of light in photocatalytic reactions depends on the type of photocatalyst (Dong et al. 2015b).

A disadvantage of large-scale application would be the incorrect choice of catalyst for pollutant degradation. That is, utilizing a photocatalyst that is ineffective or incompatible with the contaminants (Hlongwane et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019; Quesada-Cabrera & Parkin 2020). Xu et al. (2019), as shown in Figure 11, categorised photocatalyst into nitrides based photocatalysts, metal oxide-based photocatalysts and chalcogenides-based photocatalysts (Xu et al. 2019).

Figure 11

Flowchart of photocatalyst types.

Figure 11

Flowchart of photocatalyst types.

Close modal
Nitrides-based photocatalysts

Nitrides based photocatalysts are well suited for catalytic applications as they have good electrical conductivity and Pt-like band structures, thus showing catalytic activity in hydro-denitrogenation and hydro-desulfurization (Rao et al. 2021). Also nitrides nanostructures possess good mechanical toughness, including an outstanding stability in aqueous solution during electrochemical reactions (Qureshi et al. 2017). For example, the application of Gallium nitride (GaN) as a photocatalyst recorded immense success in sensing fields due to high mechanical strength and chemical stability compared to chalcogenides and oxides-based photocatalysts (Yonenaga 2001), and Tantalum nitride (Ta3N5) was effectively used for solar water splitting, due to its suitable band edge potential and narrow direct band gap (2.1 eV) (Tabata et al. 2010).

Chalcogenides-based nanomaterials

Chalcogenides-based nanomaterials had shown tremendous progress in the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution; hydrogen production from water splitting under visible light (Li et al. 2020b) among the chalcogenides, CdS CuS and ZnS semiconductors are well applied for photocatalytic reactions, such as water decomposition and CO2 reduction (Zhang et al. 2019). CuS/ZnS composites constructed by Zhang et al. (2011) showed excellent photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity under visible light, and the best H2-production rate reached 4,147 μmol h−1 g−1 with quantum efficiency of 20% at 420 nm. Chen et al. (2016) constructed CuS/CdIn2S4/ZnIn2S4 photocatalysts, which, compared to P25, CuS/CdIn2S4/ZnIn2S4 present outstanding photocatalytic activity to degrade MO under simulated sunlight and visible light, as a result of the large surface area (239.3 m2/g) and effective visible light response with an absorption edge of 670 nm.

Metal oxide based photocatalysts

Metal oxides play a significant role in environmental remediation technology. Most metal oxides may be used as photocatalysts due to their promising light absorption capabilities, electronic configuration, and charge transport characteristics. The most important characteristics of the photocatalytic system include high surface property, suitable material properties, such as high crystallinity, and electronic properties for enhanced absorption behaviour (Hernández-Ramírez & Medina-Ramírez 2016). Metal oxides are largely considered effective photocatalysts for degradation of toxic organic compounds (as pollutants) present in wastewater (Khan et al. 2015) and regarded as low cost photocatalysts with good application prospect in photocatalysis. Murthy et al. (2015) reported that TiO2, ZnO and CeO2 are suitable photocatalysts for the degradation of mutagenic compounds, which induce heritable change in cells or organisms, and carcinogenic compounds, which induce unregulated growth processes in cells or tissues of multicellular organisms (Akbari-Fakhrabadi et al. 2015; Murthy et al. 2015).

Further strategies for improving photocatlytic treatment process

At present, it is difficult to make comparative evaluation not only across photocatalytic systems but also between photocatalysts (Hoque & Guzman 2018). The vast majority of the approaches are based on the use of TiO2 semiconductors (Dong et al. 2015a), but further research should be carried out. As the upscale of photocatalytic processes may be challenging without adequate studies on more economical and available materials, also the design of more reliable photocatalysts through coating or doping on fixed supports would allow for the simultaneous degradation and separation of contaminants from the effluent stream.

To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report on a systematic comparison of appropriate semiconductor photocatalysts, although the application of photocatalysts such as TiO2, ZnO, and CeO2 has been reported due to their exceptional ability to generate charge carriers when stimulated with the required amount of light energy (Chen et al. 2012; Kalathil et al. 2013; Ansari et al. 2014).

Systematic comparative studies have not been reported in the treatment of oilfield produced water with photocatalysis processes, according to Scopus data (Figure 1). According to research, there is a rise of scientifically appealing but inappropriate materials that are brittle, chemically undesirable, costly, and potentially hazardous. WO3 and CdS, for example, are visible light photocatalysts that are relatively effective, but the toxic nature of CdS is incompatible with safe and sustainable water treatment practices (Nyamukamba et al. 2018). Also, the application of nanostructured materials to water treatment, if discharged to the environment, could possibly lead to further environmental pollution (Pietroiusti et al. 2018) and so concerns about the environmental behaviour and toxicity of various nanomaterials cast doubt on the long-term viability of nanotechnology for wastewater treatment and purification (Hlongwane et al. 2019). Thus, a system scale for photocatalytic process should consider the bio-toxicity and environmental hazards associated with nanomaterials.

In this regard, Wang et al. (2021), using a life cycle assessment (LCA), as shown in Figure 12, evaluated the environmental impact of CdS, ZnFe2O4, and NiFe2O4 under visible light irradiation. After 4 h of photocatalysis treatment, the removal efficiency of MB was greatest for CdS followed by NiFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4. Moreover, based on the results of this study, ZnFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 have lower environmental impacts than CdS, both show promise as photocatalysts, as shown in (Figure 12(a)), Cds had a higher environmental impact with high respiratory effect, climate change and carcinogenic effects compared to ZnFe2O4, and NiFe2O4. Thus, CdS will not be recommended as a treatment catalyst. Additionally, NiFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4 are recommended for further studies in a pilot treatment system due to their low environmental impacts (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 12

(a) environmental impacts of CdS, ZnFe2O4, and NiFe2O4; (b) degradation curves of MB using CdS, ZnFe2O4, and NiFe2O4 (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 12

(a) environmental impacts of CdS, ZnFe2O4, and NiFe2O4; (b) degradation curves of MB using CdS, ZnFe2O4, and NiFe2O4 (Wang et al. 2021).

Close modal

In another work, the LCA between heterogeneous photocatalysis photo-Fenton treatment process shows that an industrial wastewater treatment facility based on heterogeneous photocatalysis has a greater environmental effect than the photo-Fenton option, which scores 80–90% lower in the majority of impact categories evaluated. Further materials engineering studies were recommended to be carried out as the combination of heterogeneous photocatalysis process to the existing biological wastewater treatment can reduce the eutrophication potential, but require higher site area and electricity consumption (Chong et al. 2010).

In terms of environmental applications, photocatalysis has promising importance in wastewater treatment, including applications in the oil and gas industry, as shown by the recent growth in relevant research. Furthermore, the discharge water quality may be as high as required in light of the aim and allowable discharge concentration under various laws in different parts of the world. The present state of photocatalysis does not take into account intermediates generated during treatment; these intermediates may be more dangerous to humans and the environment in the short term. As a result, future technical progress should put into consideration for the intermediates formed as well as increase material efficiency.

Environmental pollution caused by oilfield-produced water is a threat to the human race and the environment at large due to the inability to eliminate non-biodegradable and persistent pollutants from OPW before discharge due to the conventional treatment methods used in the majority of oil and gas companies. As a result, this review article discussed the most current advancements in the treatment of OPW based photocatalysis systems. The primary benefit of photocatalytic treatment is its capacity to degrade contaminants to mineral end products without conveying contaminants through one phase to another, as is usual for conventional treatment methods. To upscale photocatalysis systems for water treatment, photocatalysis has to be competitive with other AOP technologies. A systematic comparison between photocatalysts in photocatalytic degradation research should be a primary method to identify an appropriate photocatalyst before further modification to achieving a high activity photocatalyst, suitable for industrial applications. The scope of treatment should consider vast contaminants. Also, studies on the life cycle assessment of photocatalysts at the preparatory and application stage should be intensified. Using life cycle assessment (LCA) concepts may aid in developing environmentally friendly and sustainable green synthesis techniques.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Abhang
R.
,
Kumar
D.
&
Taralkar
S.
2011
Design of photocatalytic reactor for degradation of phenol in wastewater
.
International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications
2
(
5
),
337
.
Akbari-Fakhrabadi
A.
,
Saravanan
R.
,
Jamshidijam
M.
,
Mangalaraja
R. V.
&
Gracia
M.
2015
Preparation of nanosized yttrium doped CeO2 catalyst used for photocatalytic application
.
Journal of Saudi Chemical Society
19
(
5
),
505
510
.
Ala'a
H.
&
Khraisheh
M.
2015
Photocatalytic removal of phenol from refinery wastewater: Catalytic activity of Cu-doped titanium dioxide
.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
8
,
82
90
.
Al-Ghouti
M. A.
,
Al-Kaabi
M. A.
,
Ashfaq
M. Y.
&
Da'na
D. A.
2019
Produced water characteristics, treatment and reuse: a review
.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
28
,
222
239
.
Ameta
S.
&
Ameta
R.
2018
Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: emerging green chemical technology: Academic Press, Cambridge, MA
.
Andreozzi
M.
,
Álvarez
M. G.
,
Contreras
S.
,
Medina
F.
,
Clarizia
L.
,
Vitiello
G.
,
Llorca
J.
&
Marotta
R.
2018
Treatment of saline produced water through photocatalysis using rGO-TiO2 nanocomposites
.
Catalysis Today
315
,
194
204
.
Ansari
S. A.
,
Khan
M. M.
,
Ansari
M. O.
,
Kalathil
S.
,
Lee
J.
&
Cho
M. H.
2014
Band gap engineering of CeO2 nanostructure using an electrochemically active biofilm for visible light applications
.
Rsc Advances
4
(
32
),
16782
16791
.
Ansari
S. A.
,
Khan
M. M.
,
Ansari
M. O.
&
Cho
M. H.
2016
Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (N-doped TiO2) for visible light photocatalysis
.
New Journal of Chemistry
40
(
4
),
3000
3009
.
Becheri
A.
,
Dürr
M.
,
Nostro
P. L.
&
Baglioni
P.
2008
Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles: application to textiles as UV-absorbers
.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
10
(
4
),
679
689
.
Bharagava
R. N.
2020
Emerging Eco-Friendly Green Technologies for Wastewater Treatment
.
Springer, Singapore
.
Binas
V.
,
Stefanopoulos
V.
,
Kiriakidis
G.
&
Papagiannakopoulos
P.
2019
Photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous benzene, toluene and xylene under UV and visible irradiation over Mn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles
.
Journal of Materiomics
5
(
1
),
56
65
.
Cassano
A. E.
&
Alfano
O. M.
2000
Reaction engineering of suspended solid heterogeneous photocatalytic reactors
.
Catalysis Today
58
(
2–3
),
167
197
.
Chen
H.
,
Nanayakkara
C. E.
&
Grassian
V. H.
2012
Titanium dioxide photocatalysis in atmospheric chemistry
.
Chemical Reviews
112
(
11
),
5919
5948
.
Chong
M. N.
,
Jin
B.
,
Zhu
H.
,
Chow
C.
&
Saint
C.
2009
Application of H-titanate nanofibers for degradation of Congo Red in an annular slurry photoreactor
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
150
(
1
),
49
54
.
Chong
M. N.
,
Jin
B.
,
Chow
C. W.
&
Saint
C.
2010
Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review
.
Water Research
44
(
10
),
2997
3027
.
Coha
M.
,
Farinelli
G.
,
Tiraferri
A.
,
Minella
M.
&
Vione
D.
2021
Advanced oxidation processes in the removal of organic substances from produced water: potential, configurations, and research needs
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
414
,
128668
.
Coleman
H.
,
Vimonses
V.
,
Leslie
G.
&
Amal
R.
2007
Degradation of 1, 4-dioxane in water using TiO2 based photocatalytic and H2O2/UV processes
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
146
(
3
),
496
501
.
Correa
A. X.
,
Tiepo
E. N.
,
Somensi
C. A.
,
Sperb
R. M.
&
Radetski
C. M.
2010
Use of ozone-photocatalytic oxidation (O3/UV/TiO2) and biological remediation for treatment of produced water from petroleum refineries
.
Journal of Environmental Engineering
136
(
1
),
40
45
.
Dillert
R.
,
Engel
A.
,
Grobe
J.
,
Lindner
P.
&
Bahnemann
D. W.
2013
Light intensity dependence of the kinetics of the photocatalytic oxidation of nitrogen (ii) oxide at the surface of TiO2
.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
15
(
48
),
20876
20886
.
Dong
S.
,
Feng
J.
,
Fan
M.
,
Pi
Y.
,
Hu
L.
,
Han
X.
,
Liu
M.
&
Sun
J.
2015b
Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalytic water treatment using visible light-responsive photocatalysts: a review
.
RSC Advances
5
(
19
),
14610
14630
.
Foteinis
S.
&
Chatzisymeon
E.
2020
Heterogeneous photocatalysis for water purification
. In: (Boukherroub, R. & Robertson, N., eds)
Nanostructured Photocatalysts
.
Elsevier
, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp.
75
97
.
Fujishima
A.
,
Zhang
X.
&
Tryk
D. A.
2008
TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena
.
Surface Science Reports
63
(
12
),
515
582
.
Ganesh
I.
2017
Effects of phosphorus-doping on energy band-gap, structural, surface, and photocatalytic characteristics of emulsion-based sol-gel derived TiO2 nano-powder
.
Applied Surface Science
414
,
277
291
.
Gaya
U. I.
&
Abdullah
A. H.
2008
Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems
.
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews
9
(
1
),
1
12
.
Ghamsari
M. S.
,
Alamdari
S.
,
Han
W.
&
Park
H.-H.
2017
Impact of nanostructured thin ZnO film in ultraviolet protection
.
International Journal of Nanomedicine
12
,
207
.
Gnanaprakasam
A.
,
Sivakumar
V.
&
Thirumarimurugan
M.
2015
Influencing parameters in the photocatalytic degradation of organic effluent via nanometal oxide catalyst: a review
.
Indian Journal of Materials Science
2015
,
601827, 16
.
Gogate
P. R.
&
Pandit
A. B.
2004
A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: oxidation technologies at ambient conditions
.
Advances in Environmental Research
8
(
3–4
),
501
551
.
Gopal
N. O.
,
Lo
H.-H.
,
Ke
T.-F.
,
Lee
C.-H.
,
Chou
C.-C.
,
Wu
J.-D.
,
Sheu
S.-C.
&
Ke
S.-C.
2012
Visible light active phosphorus-doped TiO2 nanoparticles: an EPR evidence for the enhanced charge separation
.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
116
(
30
),
16191
16197
.
Gouma
P.
&
Lee
J.
2014
Photocatalytic nanomats clean up produced water from fracking
.
Translational Materials Research
1
(
2
),
025002
.
Guozheng
J.
,
Guoxiang
W.
,
Yong
Z.
&
Linsheng
Z.
2010
Effects of light intensity and H2O2 on photocatalytic degradation of phenol in wastewater using TiO2/ACF
. In:
Paper Presented at the 2010 International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation
.
Gupta
A.
,
Saurav
J. R.
&
Bhattacharya
S.
2015
Solar light based degradation of organic pollutants using ZnO nanobrushes for water filtration
.
RSC Advances
5
(
87
),
71472
71481
.
Hernández-Ramírez
A.
&
Medina-Ramírez
I.
2016
Photocatalytic Semiconductors
.
Springer
,
Berlin/Heidelberg
.
Herrmann
J. G.
2005
Research to protect water infrastructure: EPA's water security research program
. In:
Paper Presented at the Optics and Photonics in Global Homeland Security
.
Hlongwane
G. N.
,
Sekoai
P. T.
,
Meyyappan
M.
&
Moothi
K.
2019
Simultaneous removal of pollutants from water using nanoparticles: a shift from single pollutant control to multiple pollutant control
.
Science of The Total Environment
656
,
808
833
.
Horvath
I.
2003
Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems
.
Journal of Encyclopedia Catalysis
5
,
577
.
Hossain
F.
2018
Sustainable Design and Build: Building, Energy, Roads, Bridges, Water and Sewer Systems: Butterworth-Heinemann
Oxford, UK
.
Jain
R.
,
Mathur
M.
,
Sikarwar
S.
&
Mittal
A.
2007
Removal of the hazardous dye rhodamine B through photocatalytic and adsorption treatments
.
Journal of Environmental Management
85
(
4
),
956
964
.
Jamali
A.
,
Vanraes
R.
,
Hanselaer
P.
&
Van Gerven
T.
2013
A batch LED reactor for the photocatalytic degradation of phenol
.
Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification
71
,
43
50
.
Jamjoum
H. A. A.
,
Umar
K.
,
Adnan
R.
,
Razali
M. R.
&
Ibrahim
M. N. M.
2021
Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activities of graphene oxide/metal oxides nanocomposites: a review
.
Frontiers in Chemistry
9
, 752276. doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.752276.
Janssens
R.
,
Cristóvão
B. M.
,
Bronze
M. R.
,
Crespo
J. G.
,
Pereira
V. J.
&
Luis
P.
2019
Photocatalysis using UV-A and UV-C light sources for advanced oxidation of anti-cancer drugs spiked in laboratory-grade water and synthetic urine
.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
59
(
2
),
647
653
.
Jiang
D.
,
Otitoju
T. A.
,
Ouyang
Y.
,
Shoparwe
N. F.
,
Wang
S.
,
Zhang
A.
&
Li
S.
2021
A review on metal ions modified TiO2 for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants
.
Catalysts
11
(
9
),
1039
.
Jimenez
S.
,
Andreozzi
M.
,
Mico
M. M.
,
Alvarez
M. G.
&
Contreras
S.
2019
Produced water treatment by advanced oxidation processes. Science of the Total Environment
666
,
12
21
.
Kang
X.
,
Liu
S.
,
Dai
Z.
,
He
Y.
,
Song
X.
&
Tan
Z.
2019
Titanium dioxide: from engineering to applications
.
Catalysts
9
(
2
),
191
.
Khan
M. M.
,
Adil
S. F.
&
Al-Mayouf
A.
2015
Metal Oxides as Photocatalysts. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society
19
(
5
),
462
464
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2015.04.003.
Krysa
J.
,
Keppert
M.
,
Jirkovsky
J.
,
Stengl
V.
&
Subrt
J.
2004
The effect of thermal treatment on the properties of TiO2 photocatalyst
.
Materials Chemistry and Physics
86
(
2–3
),
333
339
.
Kumar
A.
&
Pandey
G.
2017
A review on the factors affecting the photocatalytic degradation of hazardous materials
.
Material Science & Engineering International Journal
1
(
3
),
1
10
.
Li
G.
,
An
T.
,
Nie
X.
,
Sheng
G.
,
Zeng
X.
,
Fu
J.
,
Lin
Z.
&
Zeng
E. Y.
2007
Mutagenicity assessment of produced water during photoelectrocatalytic degradation
.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal
26
(
3
),
416
423
.
Li
D.
,
Song
H.
,
Meng
X.
,
Shen
T.
,
Sun
J.
,
Han
W.
&
Wang
X.
2020a
Effects of particle size on the structure and photocatalytic performance by alkali-treated TiO2
.
Nanomaterials
10
(
3
),
546
.
Li Puma
G.
&
Yue
P. L.
2002
Effect of the radiation wavelength on the rate of photocatalytic oxidation of organic pollutants
.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
41
(
23
),
5594
5600
.
Liu
B.
,
Chen
B.
,
Lee
K.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Ma
Y.
&
Jing
L.
2016
Removal of naphthalene from offshore produced water through immobilized nano-TiO2 aided photo-oxidation
.
Water Quality Research Journal of Canada
51
(
3
),
246
255
.
Loeb
S. K.
,
Alvarez
P. J. J.
,
Brame
J. A.
,
Cates
E. L.
,
Choi
W.
,
Crittenden
J.
,
Dionysiou
D. D.
,
Li
Q.
,
Li
P. G.
,
Xie
Q.
,
Sedlak
D. L.
,
Waite
T. D.
,
Westerhoff
P.
&
Kim
J.-H.
2018
The Technology Horizon for Photocatalytic Water Treatment: Sunrise or Sunset?
Frontiers in Chemistry 8, 817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00817.
Marco
C.
,
Giulio
F.
,
Alberto
T.
,
Minella
M.
&
Vione
D. V.
2021
Advanced Oxidation Processes in the Removal of Organic Substances From Produced Water: Potential, Configurations, and Research Needs
.
Marotti
R.
,
Giorgi
P.
,
Machado
G.
&
Dalchiele
E.
2006
Crystallite size dependence of band gap energy for electrodeposited ZnO grown at different temperatures
.
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
90
(
15
),
2356
2361
.
Mu
C.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Cui
W.
,
Liang
Y.
&
Zhu
Y.
2017
Removal of bisphenol A over a separation free 3D Ag3PO4-graphene hydrogel via an adsorption-photocatalysis synergy
.
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
212
,
41
49
.
Murthy
T. N.
,
Suresh
P.
&
Rao
A. P.
2015
Enhancement of visible light photocatalytic activity of MoO3 with V2O5 additive
.
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
2
(
11
),
257801
.
Nahar
S.
,
Zain
M.
,
Kadhum
A. A. H.
,
Hasan
H. A.
&
Hasan
M.
2017
Advances in photocatalytic CO2 reduction with water: a review
.
Materials
10
(
6
),
629
.
Neaţu
Ş.
,
Maciá-Agulló
J. A.
&
Garcia
H.
2014
Solar light photocatalytic CO2 reduction: general considerations and selected bench-mark photocatalysts
.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
15
(
4
),
5246
5262
.
Niu
P.
,
Wu
T.
,
Wen
L.
,
Tan
J.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Zheng
S.
,
Liang
Y.
,
Li
F.
,
Irvine
J. T. S.
,
Liu
G.
,
Ma
X.
&
Cheng
H.-M.
2018
Substitutional carbon-modified anatase TiO2 decahedral plates directly derived from titanium oxalate crystals via topotactic transition
.
Advanced Materials
30
(
20
),
1705999
.
Nyamukamba
P.
,
Tichagwa
L.
,
Okoh
O.
&
Petrik
L.
2018
Visible active gold/carbon co-doped titanium dioxide photocatalytic nanoparticles for the removal of dyes in water
.
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
76
,
25
30
.
Pareek
V.
,
Chong
S.
,
Tade
M.
&
Adesina
A. A.
2008
Light intensity distribution in heterogenous photocatalytic reactors
.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
3
(
2
),
171
201
.
Park
J.-H.
,
Seo
Y.-S.
,
Kim
H.-S.
&
Kim
I.-K.
2011
Photodegradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene by fluidized bed gaseous reactor with TiO2/SiO2 photocatalysts
.
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
28
(
8
),
1693
1697
.
Pawade
V. B.
,
Salame
P. H.
&
Bhanvase
B. A.
, , eds.
2020
Multifunctional Nanostructured Metal Oxides for Energy Harvesting and Storage Devices (1st ed.)
.
CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429296871(Raut-Jadhav & Bagal, 2020).
Pietroiusti
A.
,
Stockmann-Juvala
H.
,
Lucaroni
F.
&
Savolainen
K.
2018
Nanomaterial exposure, toxicity, and impact on human health
.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
10
(
5
),
e1513
.
Quesada-Cabrera
R.
&
Parkin
I. P.
2020
Qualitative approaches towards useful photocatalytic materials
.
Frontiers in Chemistry
8
,
817
.
Qureshi
M.
,
Shinagawa
T.
,
Tsiapis
N.
&
Takanabe
K.
2017
Exclusive hydrogen generation by electrocatalysts coated with an amorphous chromium-based layer achieving efficient overall water splitting
.
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
5
(
9
),
8079
8088
.
Rajendran
S.
,
Khan
M. M.
,
Gracia
F.
,
Qin
J.
,
Gupta
V. K.
&
Arumainathan
S.
2016
Ce3+ -ion-induced visible-light photocatalytic degradation and electrochemical activity of ZnO/CeO2 nanocomposite
.
Scientific Reports
6
(
1
),
1
11
.
Rani
A.
,
Reddy
R.
,
Sharma
U.
,
Mukherjee
P.
,
Mishra
P.
,
Kuila
A.
,
Sim
L.-C.
&
Saravanan
P.
2018
A review on the progress of nanostructure materials for energy harnessing and environmental remediation
.
Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry
8
(
3
),
255
291
.
Rao
T.
,
Cai
W.
,
Zhang
H.
&
Liao
W.
2021
Nanostructured metal nitrides for photocatalysts
.
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
9
,
5323
5342
.
Reyes
C.
,
Fernandez
J.
,
Freer
J.
,
Mondaca
M.
,
Zaror
C.
,
Malato
S.
&
Mansilla
H.
2006
Degradation and inactivation of tetracycline by TiO2 photocatalysis
.
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
184
(
1–2
),
141
146
.
Saadati
F.
,
Keramati
N.
&
Ghazi
M. M.
2016
Influence of parameters on the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline in wastewater: a review
.
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
46
(
8
),
757
782
.
Sacco
O.
,
Stoller
M.
,
Vaiano
V.
,
Ciambelli
P.
,
Chianese
A.
&
Sannino
D.
2012
Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes under visible light on n-doped photocatalysts
.
International Journal of Photoenergy
2012
, 8.
Santhosh
C.
,
Malathi
A.
,
Daneshvar
E.
,
Kollu
P.
&
Bhatnagar
A.
2018
Photocatalytic degradation of toxic aquatic pollutants by novel magnetic 3D-TiO2@ HPGA nanocomposite
.
Scientific Reports
8
(
1
),
1
15
.
Santos
F.
,
Azevedo
E.
&
Dezotti
M.
2006
Photocatalysis as a tertiary treatment for petroleum refinery wastewaters
.
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
23
,
451
460
.
Schneider
J.
,
Matsuoka
M.
,
Takeuchi
M.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Horiuchi
Y.
,
Anpo
M.
&
Bahnemann
D. W.
2014
Understanding TiO2 photocatalysis: mechanisms and materials
.
Chemical Reviews
114
(
19
),
9919
9986
.
Sheikholeslami
Z.
,
Kebria
D. Y.
&
Qaderi
F.
2018
Nanoparticle for degradation of BTEX in produced water; an experimental procedure
.
Journal of Molecular Liquids
264
,
476
482
.
Shoneye
A.
,
Sen Chang
J.
,
Chong
M. N.
&
Tang
J.
2021
Recent progress in photocatalytic degradation of chlorinated phenols and reduction of heavy metal ions in water by TiO2-based catalysts
.
International Materials Reviews
67
(
1
),
1
18
.
Silva
P. C.
,
Ferraz
N. P.
,
Perpetuo
E. A.
&
Asencios
Y. J. O.
2019
Oil produced water treatment using advanced oxidative processes: heterogeneous-photocatalysis and photo-Fenton
.
Journal of Sedimentary Environments
4
(
1
),
99
107
.
Singh
H. K.
,
Saquib
M.
,
Haque
M. M.
,
Muneer
M.
&
Bahnemann
D. W.
2007
Titanium dioxide mediated photocatalysed degradation of phenoxyacetic acid and 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, in aqueous suspensions
.
Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical
264
(
1–2
),
66
72
.
Su
Y.
,
Han
S.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Chen
X.
&
Lei
L.
2008
Preparation and visible-light-driven photoelectrocatalytic properties of boron-doped TiO2 nanotubes
.
Materials Chemistry and Physics
110
(
2–3
),
239
246
.
Sun
J.
,
Wang
X.
,
Sun
J.
,
Sun
R.
,
Sun
S.
&
Qiao
L.
2006
Photocatalytic degradation and kinetics of Orange G using nano-sized Sn (IV)/TiO2/AC photocatalyst
.
Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical
260
(
1–2
),
241
246
.
Tamirat
A. G.
,
Rick
J.
,
Dubale
A. A.
,
Su
W.-N.
&
Hwang
B.-J.
2016
Using hematite for photoelectrochemical water splitting: a review of current progress and challenges
.
Nanoscale Horizons
1
(
4
),
243
267
.
Vasantharaj
S.
,
Sathiyavimal
S.
,
Senthilkumar
P.
,
Kalpana
V.
,
Rajalakshmi
G.
,
Alsehli
M.
,
Elfakhasany
A.
&
Pugazhendhi
A.
2021
Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of water pollutants using bio-Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs)
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
9
(
4
),
105772
.
Xu
C.
,
Anusuyadevi
P. R.
,
Aymonier
C.
,
Luque
R.
&
Marre
S.
2019
Nanostructured materials for photocatalysis
.
Chemical Society Reviews
48
(
14
),
3868
3902
.
Yeganeh
M.
,
Charkhloo
E.
,
Sobhi
H. R.
,
Esrafili
A.
&
Gholami
M.
2021
Photocatalytic processes associated with degradation of pesticides in aqueous solutions: systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
428
,
130081
.
Yu
J. C.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Zheng
Z.
&
Zhao
J.
2003
Synthesis and characterization of phosphated mesoporous titanium dioxide with high photocatalytic activity
.
Chemistry of Materials
15
(
11
),
2280
2286
.
Zhang
F.
,
Wang
X.
,
Liu
H.
,
Liu
C.
,
Wan
Y.
,
Long
Y.
&
Cai
Z.
2019
Recent advances and applications of semiconductor photocatalytic technology
.
Applied Sciences
9
(
12
),
2489
.
Zhou
H.
,
Qu
Y.
,
Zeid
T.
&
Duan
X.
2012
Towards highly efficient photocatalysts using semiconductor nanoarchitectures
.
Energy & Environmental Science
5
(
5
),
6732
6743
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).