The publisher regrets that Table 3 was printed incorrectly in the above paper due to an error in production. We wish to apologise for any inconvenience caused by this. The correct version of Table 3 is given below and has been updated online.

Table 3

Average platform and in situ RS concentrations and typical ‘domestic’ wastewater ratios from the four testing platforms

Measurement conditionsAverage concentrations (mg·L−1)
Average ratios
SSCODBOD5COD/BOD5COD/SS
Platform P1 380 747 309 2.5 2.0 
P2 391 729 347 2.1 1.9 
P3 352 653 295 2.3 2.1 
P4 349 697 347 2.1 2.1 
Average of the 4 platforms 368 706 324   
Range of EN 12566-3 + A2 200–700 300–1,000 150–500   
In situ (Olivier et al. 2019b) Average 544 1,212 514   
80th percentile 789 1,810 690   
Measurement conditionsAverage concentrations (mg·L−1)
Average ratios
SSCODBOD5COD/BOD5COD/SS
Platform P1 380 747 309 2.5 2.0 
P2 391 729 347 2.1 1.9 
P3 352 653 295 2.3 2.1 
P4 349 697 347 2.1 2.1 
Average of the 4 platforms 368 706 324   
Range of EN 12566-3 + A2 200–700 300–1,000 150–500   
In situ (Olivier et al. 2019b) Average 544 1,212 514   
80th percentile 789 1,810 690   
View Large
View Original Article
© 2022 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).