The herculean imprecation of nitrogen-based pollutant like ammoniacal nitrogen (AN) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) on aquatic milieu is now a concern for the dye, pharma and fertiliser industries. Wastewater from these is characterised with high concentration of AN, COD and total dissolved solids (TDS), treatment of which is of utmost importance for a cleaner environment. In the current research work, an attempt was made to apply integrated electro-coagulation (EC) – sonication process for the removal of COD and AN from highly acidic dye intermediate wastewater containing high to very high concentration of COD and AN. Systematic laboratory experiments were conducted for the treatment of dye intermediate wastewater and influences of pH (5–11), applied voltage (0.5–4V) and electrolysis time (30–120 min) were investigated. A Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used for optimization of major operating parameters for EC. The conditions for minimum fraction remaining (C/C0), was found to be same for both COD and AN, i.e. pH 7, time 90 min and applied voltage 2V. The C/Co value for COD and AN were 0.244 and 0.302, respectively. The C/Co value of COD and AN in combined EC-Sonication process with optimum operating conditions were 0.145 and 0.228 respectively with sonication time 60 min at a frequency of 33 kHz. Thus, EC – sonication process is an efficacious process for their removal from dye industrial wastewater.

  • Highly concentrated dye intermediate wastewater was treated with combined advanced oxidation processes.

  • Various influencing factors were studied including pH, voltage, and electrolysis time.

  • Simultaneous removal of COD and AN was chosen to understand the process efficiency.

  • Parametric optimization was conducted to find the optimum operating conditions.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

The world of textile industries demands varieties of synthetic dyes leading to its numerous intermediate products (Paździor et al. 2019). To cater for demand, the dye intermediates are synthesized and manufactured in substantial amount in India. Some regions of Gujarat have grabbed attention at global scale with reference to synthetic pigments and its toxic effluent (Chakraborty & Basu 2019). Dye intermediate manufacturing industries have a wide application in the field of textile, food, leather, rubber, etc. Due to these wide applications, a large amount of wastewater is produced from these industries and are discharged into water bodies with only partial treatment (Hayat et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2018). The harmful effects of dye intermediate effluents on aquatic environment were discussed in detail by the authors Pani et al. (2020).

The effluent includes a variety of hazardous contaminants such as high chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammoniacal nitrogen (AN) (NH4+-N), high total organic carbon (TOC), high chloride content, high sulphates, high concentrations of heavy metals such as copper, nickel, chromium, and iron (Yaseen & Scholz 2019; Pani et al. 2020).

The alarming concentration of COD and AN in the discharged effluent endangers human health and damages aquatic community by exhausting the DO level in the receiving water bodies. Moreover, toxic algae such as Euglenophyta and Chrysophytaget stimulated by inorganic nitrogen pollution hampers the survival, growth and reproduction of aquatic organisms (Camargo & Alonso 2006; Dong et al. 2017; Soliman & Eldyasti 2018).

Several technologies are available for treatment of such industrial wastewaters. The commonly used include physical (Quan et al. 2009), chemical (Zhang et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2017) and biological methods (Phan et al. 2017; Miao et al. 2018; Zhou et al. 2018). Methods such as breakpoint chlorination, precipitation and ion exchange (chemical), ammonia stripping and membrane separation (physical); and nitrification, denitrification (biological) perform poorly in removing AN where high to very high concentration of COD is predominant (Pani et al. 2020).

Thus, few researchers have stressed on use of different advanced oxidation processes such as Fenton oxidation process (Xavier et al. 2015; Gonzalez-Merchan et al. 2016), electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (Candido & Gomes 2011; Zhang et al. 2018; Menon et al. 2021), electro-Fenton in combination with biological process (Li et al. 2018), ultrasonic irradiation (Ozturk & Bal 2015) and photo and electrochemical methods such as electrocoagulation (EC) (Kasmuri & Tarmizi 2018), etc. Electrochemical oxidation processes have seen widespread use over the past two decades and ultrasound technology has gained popularity in recent years as a means of treating wastewater (Hassani et al. 2022). The fundamental problem with the EC method is that a passive layer eventually forms on the surface of the electrode. By generating large concentrations of oxidants to remove the contaminants by generating high-pressure sites during the cavitation process, acoustic waves break the sediments generated (Moradi et al. 2021). By combining such methods, 99 and 62%, respectively, were determined to be the highest COD and colour removal efficacy for the anode-cathode combination of Fe/Fe (Prajapati 2021).

Further improvement in removal has been achieved by optimizing operating parameters using response surface methodology (RSM) technique. It uses regression analysis to predict the value of dependent variable from combination of independent variables (Huda et al. 2017). Various chemical, physical and biological processes for a variety of pollutants have been modelled and optimized using RSM (Asaithambi et al. 2016; Mehdipoor & Moosavirad 2020). A few investigators have applied it in Fenton and electro-Fenton process (Akkaya et al. 2019; Mohammadi et al. 2019a, 2019b).

Fenton oxidation process was effectively applied to remove AN in presence of high COD from dye intermediate wastewater (Pani et al. 2020). The removal efficiency of AN and COD were found to be 75.8% and 78.6% respectively at pH 3 and molar dosage of Fe2+ and H2O2 of 3:3 for 60 min reaction time. But, removal of 75.8% did not reduce their concentration to acceptable values, thus further work on electrochemical processes such as EF and EC were carried out (Menon et al. 2021).

EC process is one of the most economical technologies for the treatment of industrial wastewater (Syam-Babu et al. 2020). It involves dissolution of sacrificial anodes immersed in wastewater by using current.

The bubbles production in sonication process leads to a series of significant physical and chemical changes in the solution (Soltani et al. 2018). Growth and compression happen due to rectified diffusion of micro-bubbles attaining equilibrium size and producing acoustic micro-flows. A tremendous pressure (400 MPa) is generated during bubble collapse which leads to formation of hydroxyl radical as shown in Equations (1)–(5) (Hua & Hoffmann 1997; Villeneuve et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2019; Menon et al. 2021).
formula
(1)
formula
(2)
formula
(3)
formula
(4)
formula
(5)
where, )))) represents ultrasonic splitting.

The advantages of EC process include no addition of chemicals, easy maintenance, no harmful by-products, etc. (Priya & Jeyanthi 2019; Lu et al. 2022). According to recent studies, combined EC-sonication process is effective in eliminating the disadvantages of EC process like removing the passive film from electrode surface, breaking the flocs in the solution and reducing the particle size thus enhancing the sorption mechanism of EC (Lakshmi & Sivashanmugam 2013; He et al. 2016). According to the literatures reported earlier, only few studies are available in which such highly polluted wastewater is treated by EC-sonication process.

Considering the high removal efficiencies in EC and sonication processes as realized by various researchers for several types of wastewaters. The authors of the current study have explored the efficacy of batch EC process and EC followed by sonication process for the removal of AN and COD from dye intermediate manufacturing wastewater. The performance of EC batch process was evaluated by varying major operating parameters like pH, applied voltage and electrolysis time. The EC followed by sonication process was performed to study influence of sonication on the removal efficiency and to compare the performance of EC and EC followed by sonication process. The sonication process was performed on the optimum condition of EC batch process.

To quantify the influence of process parameters, an RSM was executed to predict the optimum values of major operating parameters on treatment efficiency by using MINITAB (version 19) statistical software and ANOVA.

Materials and analytical procedure

The dye intermediate wastewater was collected in a 20 L container from a dye intermediate manufacturing industry in Ankleshwar, Gujarat, India. The analysis of all the parameters were carried out according to APHA and IS: 3025 methods. All chemicals and solvents used for analysis and experiment were of analytical grade and of Merck brand. The solution pH was analysed using Bench-top pH meter (HACH, sensION+). COD was analysed by closed reflux method and AN analysis was carried out using automatic nitrogen analyser (KELPLUS CLASSIC-DX). Dual DC power supply (Model: ALE100A) with power supply of 0 ± 30 V/5Amp was used for AN. Sonicator (Model: SM50US) operating at a frequency of 33 kHz and capacity of 5 L with UL power 100 W was used for the sonication process. Post treatment sludge analysis was done to study the morphology and shape of a sample, using scanning election microscope (SEM)/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis.

All parameters at an optimum condition. The physico-chemical characteristics of the wastewater are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Physico-chemical characteristics of dye intermediate wastewater

ParametersValues in mg/L (except pH)Standard deviation
pH 0.89 0.0052 
Total solids 2,01,790 29.02 
Total dissolved solids 1,81,450 28.87 
Total suspended solids 20,340 28.86 
COD 15,360 184.75 
BOD 90 10.39 
AN 741.44 5.82 
Conductivity 258.15 mS/cm 5.2 
Sulphate 2,575 – 
Chloride 560 – 
TOC 20,040 288.67 
Nitrate 1,020 – 
ParametersValues in mg/L (except pH)Standard deviation
pH 0.89 0.0052 
Total solids 2,01,790 29.02 
Total dissolved solids 1,81,450 28.87 
Total suspended solids 20,340 28.86 
COD 15,360 184.75 
BOD 90 10.39 
AN 741.44 5.82 
Conductivity 258.15 mS/cm 5.2 
Sulphate 2,575 – 
Chloride 560 – 
TOC 20,040 288.67 
Nitrate 1,020 – 

Electrochemical reactor setup

The experimental setup of electrocoagulation comprised of a batch reactor with a working volume of 1,000 mL. The experiments were performed using iron electrodes (6*3*0.3 cm) with an inter electrode spacing of 4 cm. The ohmic drop in the reactor results from the ohmic resistance offered by the electrolyte and the spacing between the electrodes, the ohmic resistance is directly proportional to the spacing and inversely proportional to conductivity of the working solution. As the conductivity of the working solution is considerably very high the ohmic resistance offered by the spacing between the electrodes would be insignificant or minimum. Considering aforesaid fact, as well as based on the published articles, authors have considered the spacing between the electrodes as 4 cm in the current study. Electrolysis was conducted in the original conductivity of the dye intermediate wastewater without addition of supporting electrolyte using a digital DC power supply. The solution was mixed during the process with magnetic stirrer at set RPM for homogenisation of the process. The previous studies done by Vanlangendonck et al. (2005), Li & Liu (2009) and Mahvi et al. (2011) found that the optimum pH range for removal of ammonia is 5.5–10. Neutral pH is suggested for AN removal. In strongly alkaline conditions, the oxidation rate of AN decreases. Thus, the experiments were conducted at different pH ranging from 5 to 11, to study the effect of pH. The effectiveness of the process and the expense of the treatment are both influenced by the voltage, which is one of the key parameters in electrochemical methods of treatment. According to earlier study by Pani et al. (2020) and Menon et al. (2021), which used the same effluent, the ideal voltage range is from 1 to 4 V. Beyond 4 V, the power consumption will increase drastically, due to which, this study is only limited to maximum of 4 V. By creating alkaline conditions and changing the pH, metal hydroxides are produced, which increases the efficiency of removing contaminants (Shahedi et al. 2020). Thus, the experiments were conducted at potentiostat mode (constant voltage) varying the voltage from 0.5 to 4 V. The potentiostat mode consists of the application of a constant potential at the working electrode (WE) throughout the electrolysis time. During potentiostat mode current response value changes quite fast, when compared to the potential response during the galvanostatic mode of functioning.

Effect of electrolysis time was studied by varying the time between 0 and 120 min. At optimum conditions (acquired through experiment) of EC process, the sample was subjected to sonication for 60 min.

The experimental setup and layout of EC and sonication is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Experimental setup of electrocoagulation and sonication process.

Figure 1

Experimental setup of electrocoagulation and sonication process.

Close modal

Parameter optimization with response surface methodology

RSM applies combination of mathematical and statistical techniques for parameter optimization. The most important use of RSM is in those particular situations when several input parameters potentially influence the performance or quality characteristic of the process. Methodology is to fit a polynomial equation to the experimental data, which describes the behaviour of a data set with the objective of making statistical projections (Bezerra et al. 2008). A linear or square polynomial function is employed to describe the system and explore the experimental conditions, finally culminating into parameter optimization (Bezerra et al. 2008).

The general equation to which the experimental data was fitted is as follows
formula
(6)
where, y is response, β0, (β12,β3), (β1122β33,), and β12,β13,β23 are the regression coefficients for intercept, linear, quadratic and interaction terms; X1, X2 and X3 are the independent variables and ɛ represents standard error between the observed and modelled response value (Akkaya et al. 2019). The quality of fit was evaluated by R2, and its statistical significance was evaluated by T- and F-test. Minitab software (Minitab) was used for the purpose and results are described in detail in section 5.1.

This section is divided into several subsections which explore the effect of pH, voltage and time on treatment in EC process. Then, treatment parameters are optimized which is followed by comparison between EC and EC-sonication process.

Influence of pH on EC process

The performance of EC process is controlled by pH of the aqueous medium as the amount of Fe2+ and Fe3+ formation is influenced by pH. Precipitation of pollutants at lower pH is unfavourable due to production of mono and di-hydroxide complex of iron (Singh & Ramesh 2014; Yavuz & Ögütveren 2018). The speciation of various species of iron with respect to pH (Nidheesh & Singh 2017) is provided in Table 1s. According to Nidheesh & Singh 2017, the various forms of ferrous ion and ferric ion can exist in different pH conditions.

The pH of the wastewater was varied between 5 and 11 at an applied voltage of 1V, maintaining the electrode distance of 4 cm and electrode area of 18 cm2. At various intervals of time, i.e., 30 min, 60 min, 90 min and 120 minutes, the samples were taken for analysis of COD and AN. The most favourable pH value for COD and AN removal was found to be pH 7. At this pH, the fraction remaining (C/C0) for COD and AN were minimum (i.e., 0.244 and 0.302, respectively) at electrolysis time of 90 min and an applied voltage 1 V (Figure 2(a) and 2(b)). Lower pH (pH < 7) leads to formation of Fe(OH)2+ and Fe(OH)2+ complexes resulting in poor removal efficiency of COD and AN as described elsewhere also (Izadi et al. 2018). The poor coagulants are formed which are highly soluble in solution with no adsorption capacity (Li et al. 2018). Cationic monomeric species such as Fe+2, Fe(OH)2+, Fe(OH)+2, Fe(OH)4− are soluble in water in the high and low pH conditions (El-Ashtoukhy et al. 2017).
Figure 2

(a) Fraction remaining for COD at different pH and time interval (experimental conditions: applied voltage-1 V, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2). (b) Fraction remaining for AN at different pH and time interval (experimental conditions: applied voltage-1 V, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2).

Figure 2

(a) Fraction remaining for COD at different pH and time interval (experimental conditions: applied voltage-1 V, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2). (b) Fraction remaining for AN at different pH and time interval (experimental conditions: applied voltage-1 V, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2).

Close modal

Higher pH (pH > 7) leads to the production of hydroxide ion resulting in more amount of Fe ion generation (Singh & Ramesh 2014). When pH value is increased above 10, due to high hydrogen evolution, the C/C0 values of COD and AN were increased as shown in Figure 2(a) and 2(b). The oxidation reaction occurs at anode and the water reduction at cathodes which are represented in Equations (1)–(4). When iron electrode is used in EC process, Fe2+ is hydrolysed to give Fe(OH)2 and on oxidation gives Fe3+ and then hydrolysed to Fe(OH)3. The coagulants such as Fe(OH)+ and Fe(OH)2+ are formed (Yavuz & Ögütveren 2018) which does not help in adsorption of pollutants.

The species like Fe2+, Fe(OH)2+, Fe(OH)2+ and Fe(OH)3 exists in low pH range. The Fe(OH)2 and Fe(OH)3 are the coagulants that helps in COD and AN removal. As the main coagulants are present in low concentration, the C/C0 values for COD and AN have high values leading to less removal efficiency than the neutral and basic pH (Figure 2(a) and 2(b)) as described elsewhere also (Garcia-Segura et al. 2017; Mamelkina et al. 2019).

At neutral pH, the species like Fe(OH)3 exists as the principal coagulants in the solution. The pollutants are adsorbed effectively by these species and thehighest removal efficiency is achieved as found elsewhere also (Nidheesh & Singh 2017; Syam-Babu et al. 2020).

Amorphous flocs produced called sweep flocs have larger surface area which is useful for rapid adsorption of pollutants such as COD and AN and permit colloidal material to precipitate (Boudjema et al. 2014; El-Ashtoukhy et al. 2017). Fe+3 and OH ions produced at anode and cathode, respectively, react to form various monomeric species that finally transform into insoluble, stable, and amorphous Fe(OH)3 through complex polymerization kinetics and the adsorption capacity of Fe flocs towards organic molecules increase in neutral pH and, consequently, the adsorption capacity of ferric flocs towards the organic molecule increases. The degradation of the organic contaminants from water occurs by surface complexation and electrostatic attraction that followed by coagulation (Daneshvar et al. 2006; El-Ashtoukhy et al. 2017).

The effect of major ions such as chloride and sulphate on electrocoagulation process has been analysed. In general, the presence of ions or electrolytes like chloride, sulphates increase the corrosion of metallic species in the anode regime by breaking down the passive anode layer formed by the insulating Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions present in the wastewater (Anantha-Singh & Ramesh 2014). The presence of high sulphate ions concentration was fairly unfavourable for power utilization and overall process efficacy. Whereas, the sulphate ions can act as an electrolyte that boost the current distribution in the reactor, which has been shown to improve the effectiveness of the process for organic industrial wastewaters treatment (Ghernaout & Ghernaout 2012).

In electrochemical conversion of ammonium to nitrogen gas, chloride plays an integral part. At different pH (5–11), formation of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hypochlorite ion (OCl) from chloride ions occurs. Regeneration of Cl ions takes place through breakpoint chlorination when hypochlorous acid (HOCl) reacts with NH3 or NH4+. The purpose of the Cl ions was to act as a catalyst, hence, after the reaction its concentration remains unchanged (Kabdaşlı et al. 2012).

Influence of applied voltage on EC process

Applied voltage is one of the strong factors affecting the removal of carbon and nitrogen-based pollutants in EC process. The production rate of metal hydroxide flocs increases with applied voltage due to which significant increase in pollutant removal is observed (Khandegar & Saroha 2013).

In this study, the applied voltage was varied from 0.5 to 4 V, i.e., 0.5 V (0.05 A/m2), 1 V (0.083 A/m2), 1.5 V (0.012 A/m2), 2 V (0.02 A/m2), 2.5 V (0.026 A/m2), 3 V (0.042 A/m2), 3.5 V (0.047 A/m2) and 4 V (0.052 A/m2) at pH 7, electrode distance of 4 cm. The results are shown in Figure 3(a) and 3(b).
Figure 3

(a): Fraction remaining (C/C0) for COD at different applied voltage and time interval (experimental conditions: pH-7, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2). (b) Fraction remaining (C/C0) for AN at different applied voltage and time interval (experimental conditions: pH-7, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2).

Figure 3

(a): Fraction remaining (C/C0) for COD at different applied voltage and time interval (experimental conditions: pH-7, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2). (b) Fraction remaining (C/C0) for AN at different applied voltage and time interval (experimental conditions: pH-7, electrode distance-4 cm, electrode area-18 cm2).

Close modal

It can be seen that the minimum fraction remaining (C/C0) was observed at 2 V. Afterwards, the process efficaciousness decreases with increasing applied voltage. Hence, the efficiency proportionate with current density to a certain extend achieving the optimum removal condition and then saturates to a constant value as reported elsewhere also Mollah et al. 2001; Deghles & Kurt 2016. The rigorous release of metal ions is initiated by dissolution of anodic material at higher current which is governed by Faraday's law. A series of insoluble metallic hydroxide species evolves through hydrolysis process. Hence, more iron ions are generated which successively react with OH to form iron-based hydroxides. N- species are not adsorbed by monomeric as well as polymeric species of iron such as Fe(OH)+, Fe(OH)2+, Fe(OH)2+, Fe(H2O)5OH2+,Fe(H2O)4 (OH)2+, Fe(H2O)8(OH)24+ which forms at different pH conditions as shown in Fig. 1s. Additionally, due to elevated current density, the hydrogen gas is produced in cathodic surface which enhances the upward flux resulting in more removal efficiency, similar findings have been reported elsewhere also (Izadi et al. 2018; Mohammadi et al. 2019a, 2019b). The production rate of coagulant Fe2+ or Fe3+, and the size and distribution of bubbles were strongly influenced by current density/applied voltage. By increasing current density above a certain range, the efficiency reduces as the rate of bubble formation and flocs increases. Also, the liberation of H2 gas resulted in reduced adsorption on the surface of amorphous iron hydroxides (El-Ashtoukhy et al. 2017).

The specific energy consumption for EC process has been calculated using Equation (6), where V is the cell voltage (V), I is the current (A), t is the electrolysis time (min), COD0 and CODt are the initial chemical oxygen demands and chemical oxygen demands at time t (mg/L), respectively, similarly the AN was considered.
formula
formula
formula

where,

  • = Rated power in W

  • t = Treatment time (h)

  • V = Volume of the wastewater (L)

  • M = Change in the concentration of the pollutant (gm/L)

The specific energy consumption was found to be 2.01 kWh/m3 for the COD removal under the EC process. The specific energy of sonication for COD and AN was calculated using Equation (7) and the values were found to be 0.1731 kWhr/kg and 3.8845 kWh/kg, respectively.

Influence of electrolysis time on EC process

The cost of power consumption is driven by the runtime of the reactor (Sen et al. 2019). As the electrolysis time increases, the removal efficiency ascends to a certain extent, giving a significant yield and finally reaches to a constant value (Khandegar & Saroha 2013; Damaraju et al. 2017; Manikandan et al. 2018). As shown in Figures 2 and 3, this value was observed at 90 min experimentally, where the C/C0 for COD is 0.244 and AN is 0.302 at the following conditions, i.e., voltage of 2 V, pH value of 7, electrode distance of 4 cm (emerging area = 18 cm2).

The release of coagulating species happens during dissolution of anodic material. With increase in electrolysis period, the production of the metal ion and the hydroxide flocs also increase. For a longer electrolysis time, there is an increase in generation of flocs and beyond the optimum electrolysis time, the flocs are not available; as a result, there is no further increase in removal efficiency, as found elsewhere (Aoudj et al. 2010; Manikandan et al. 2018).

An increase occurs in the concentration of ions and their hydroxide flocs occurs when the electrolysis period is increased. A change in colour of the dye solution from dark green to yellow brown indicates the increase in concentration of Fe(OH)3. This formation of flocs due to spontaneous discharge of ferric ions further forms ferric hydroxide (brown flocs) (Ghernaout et al. 2008).

Comparison of EC batch process and EC-sonication process

Sonication process generally works in the frequency 20 kHz–2 MHz. Application of sonication is found to be unproductive alone for removal or degradation of pollutants. Several studies reveal that on integrating sonication with other electrochemical process leads to good results in removal of pollutants (Gągol et al. 2018). Sonochemistry works through both the physical and chemical effect. The chemical effect through OH. and physical effect through cavitation increases the treatment efficiency (Nidheesh et al. 2021).

The enhancement of removal efficiency in combined electrocoagulation and sonication process is due to generation of •OH, H• and HO2• radicals by the ultrasound energy which are responsible for the degradation of organic pollutants (Kovatcheva & Parlapanski 1999; Chu et al. 2012; Raschitor et al. 2014; He et al. 2016; Al-Qodah et al. 2018; Menon et al. 2021.

In this study, at optimum conditions of EC (achieved experimentally as discussed in the previous sections, i.e., pH 7, 2 V and 90 min), the sample was exposed to sonication process for 60 min. It was found that EC-Sonication had better removal efficiency than EC for same operating conditions. The C/C0 of COD and AN after sonication were found to be 0.145 and 0.228, respectively, as shown in Figure 4. The TOC of the wastewater has been reduced from 20,040 mg/L to 1,536 mg/L after the combined process. This is due to the synergetic effect of sonication. Due to the high rate of mixing and generation of oxidative species, the combined EC and sonication process gives a remarkable increase in removal efficiency. The results observed by the authors in the current study has been compared with the results reported by different researchers and shown in Table 2. The results observed are comparable or better than the results observed by other researchers for different wastewater.
Table 2

Comparison of the present study with the treatments of the other industrial wastewater

Sr. No.Type of electrode and optimum parametersType of wastewaterDegradation efficiencyReference
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 4.5, current density = 560 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 65 min 
Palm oil mill industrial wastewater 75% [COD]
100% [Colour]
100% [Turbidity] 
Bashir et al. (2016)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 4–7, current density = 400 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 6 h 
Tannery industrial wastewater 81% [COD]
97% [Chromium (III)] 
Elabbas et al. (2016)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 6, current density = 18 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 36 min 
Sewage wastewater 64% [COD]
80% [Turbidity] 
Baran et al. (2018)  
Iron electrodes
pH = 8.3, current density = 1.5 mA/cm2, electrolysis duration = 25 min 
Paper mill industrial wastewater >95% [Colour]
BOD5/COD increased from 0.26 to 0.41 
Wagle et al. (2020)  
Iron and aluminium electrodes
pH = 6, Current density = 0.32 mA/cm2, NaCl concentration = 1 g/L, Electrolysis duration = 1 min 
Biodiesel industrial wastewater Iron electrode
92% [COD]
92% [TOC]
Aluminium electrode
91% [COD]
92% [TOC] 
Tanatti et al. (2018)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 7.8, current density = 1.5 mA/cm2, electrolysis duration = 20 min 
Food industrial wastewater 70% [COD] Veli et al. (2018)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 4.84, current density = 100 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 293 min, electrode distance = 6 cm 
Pistachio processing industrial wastewater 44% [COD]
56% [Total phenols] 
Ozay et al. (2018)  
 Iron electrodes
pH = 7, applied voltage = 2 V, electrolysis duration = 90 min 
Dye intermediate industrial wastewater 75.6% [COD]
70% [NH4+
Current study 
Sr. No.Type of electrode and optimum parametersType of wastewaterDegradation efficiencyReference
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 4.5, current density = 560 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 65 min 
Palm oil mill industrial wastewater 75% [COD]
100% [Colour]
100% [Turbidity] 
Bashir et al. (2016)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 4–7, current density = 400 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 6 h 
Tannery industrial wastewater 81% [COD]
97% [Chromium (III)] 
Elabbas et al. (2016)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 6, current density = 18 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 36 min 
Sewage wastewater 64% [COD]
80% [Turbidity] 
Baran et al. (2018)  
Iron electrodes
pH = 8.3, current density = 1.5 mA/cm2, electrolysis duration = 25 min 
Paper mill industrial wastewater >95% [Colour]
BOD5/COD increased from 0.26 to 0.41 
Wagle et al. (2020)  
Iron and aluminium electrodes
pH = 6, Current density = 0.32 mA/cm2, NaCl concentration = 1 g/L, Electrolysis duration = 1 min 
Biodiesel industrial wastewater Iron electrode
92% [COD]
92% [TOC]
Aluminium electrode
91% [COD]
92% [TOC] 
Tanatti et al. (2018)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 7.8, current density = 1.5 mA/cm2, electrolysis duration = 20 min 
Food industrial wastewater 70% [COD] Veli et al. (2018)  
Aluminium electrodes
pH = 4.84, current density = 100 A/m2, electrolysis duration = 293 min, electrode distance = 6 cm 
Pistachio processing industrial wastewater 44% [COD]
56% [Total phenols] 
Ozay et al. (2018)  
 Iron electrodes
pH = 7, applied voltage = 2 V, electrolysis duration = 90 min 
Dye intermediate industrial wastewater 75.6% [COD]
70% [NH4+
Current study 
Figure 4

The fraction remaining (C/C0) post degradation of COD and AN (with and without sonication).

Figure 4

The fraction remaining (C/C0) post degradation of COD and AN (with and without sonication).

Close modal

Sludge characteristics

The sludge generated out of the electrocoagulation-sonication process has been collected and characterized using SEM and the elemental compositions of the samples were observed via EDX spectra. The SEM and EDS analysis of the dried sludge are shown in Figure 5(a) and 5(b). Aggregate shapes with non-uniform distribution of particle sizes varying from 6 to 100 μm of sludge has been observed from the micrograph image. The EDS analysis shows that the sludge contains various metallic elements with the abundance of C > O > N > Cl > Cu > Fe > Al. Group of metals represent electrode dissolution and floc formed during the process which settled as sludge. EDX shows high metal content in sludge which demonstrate the morphological nature and texture of sludge which shows that the sludge contains both crystalline and amorphous content. As the sludge contains high amounts of C, O, N, Fe, and trace elements, hence it can be used as fertilizer and soil fertility enhancer. This metallic composition of the sludge also enables it to be used in cement manufactory as raw material (Nidheesh & Singh 2017).
Figure 5

(a) SEM micrograph of sludge. (b) EDS spectrum of dried sludge.

Figure 5

(a) SEM micrograph of sludge. (b) EDS spectrum of dried sludge.

Close modal

Parametric optimization

RSM analysis was performed on experimental data to derive the second order polynomial equation for the estimation of optimum conditions. The ANOVA results are summarised in Tables 3 and 4 for AN and COD, respectively. The regression equations (i.e., responses) generated for AN and COD are shown by Equations (7) and (8). The quality of fitted model and its statistical significance was evaluated by R2 and T-Test/F-Test. Values of adjusted R2 show that the model terms are highly significant. The values of predicted R2 are the values predicted by the design, which measures the variation in model predicted data (Garg & Prasad 2016). R2 values of 78.2% for AN and 82.7% for COD, respectively, indicated an acceptable level of accuracy of the fitted model. Model terms were utilized post assessment of P-value (with 95% confidence level). P-values less than 0.05 implies higher significance whereas greater than 0.1, the lower. P-value less than 0.00001 indicate that terms are highly significant. The linear and square terms of pH and voltage terms have higher significance for AN as well as COD, others are not significant. The insignificant terms were removed from the general equation. Response surface methodology was used for estimating optimal values of variable of Equations (7) and (8) at which removal is maximized. The response surface for pH, time and voltage is depicted in Figures 6 and 7 for AN and COD. It can be seen that the optimal values of pH, time and voltage was ∼8.2, ∼90.9 min and ∼2.6 V for AN and ∼ 7.6, ∼100.9 min and ∼2.6 V for COD. The C/C0 was estimated on these optimized values, which were 0.302 (i.e., ∼70% removal) and 0.244 (i.e., 76% removal) for AN and COD, respectively.
Table 3

Analysis of variance of AN (DF: degree of freedom; SS: sum of squares; MS: means squares)

SourceDFAdj SSAdj MSF-ValueP-Value
Model 0.520088 0.065011 22.85 0.000 
Linear 0.068472 0.022824 8.02 0.000 
pH 0.029269 0.029269 10.29 0.002 
Time 0.013255 0.013255 4.66 0.036 
0.034477 0.034477 12.12 0.001 
Square 0.346074 0.115358 40.55 0.000 
pH*pH 0.293124 0.293124 103.05 0.000 
Time*Time 0.010827 0.010827 3.81 0.057 
V*V 0.031679 0.031679 11.14 0.002 
2-Way interaction 0.003612 0.001806 0.63 0.534 
pH*Time 0.000105 0.000105 0.04 0.848 
Time*V 0.003120 0.003120 1.10 0.300 
Error 51 0.145071 0.002845   
Lack-of-fit 47 0.145063 0.003086 1646.11 0.06 
Pure error 0.000008 0.000002   
Total 59 0.665159    
SourceDFAdj SSAdj MSF-ValueP-Value
Model 0.520088 0.065011 22.85 0.000 
Linear 0.068472 0.022824 8.02 0.000 
pH 0.029269 0.029269 10.29 0.002 
Time 0.013255 0.013255 4.66 0.036 
0.034477 0.034477 12.12 0.001 
Square 0.346074 0.115358 40.55 0.000 
pH*pH 0.293124 0.293124 103.05 0.000 
Time*Time 0.010827 0.010827 3.81 0.057 
V*V 0.031679 0.031679 11.14 0.002 
2-Way interaction 0.003612 0.001806 0.63 0.534 
pH*Time 0.000105 0.000105 0.04 0.848 
Time*V 0.003120 0.003120 1.10 0.300 
Error 51 0.145071 0.002845   
Lack-of-fit 47 0.145063 0.003086 1646.11 0.06 
Pure error 0.000008 0.000002   
Total 59 0.665159    
Table 4

Analysis of variance of COD (DF: degree of freedom; SS: sum of squares; MS: means squares)

SourceDFAdj SSAdj MSF-ValueP-Value
Model 1.45460 0.181825 30.36 0.000 
Linear 0.19408 0.064692 10.80 0.000 
pH 0.08868 0.088684 14.81 0.000 
Time 0.02001 0.020006 3.34 0.043 
0.05879 0.058787 9.82 0.003 
Square 0.83426 0.278087 46.44 0.000 
pH*pH 0.75944 0.759440 126.82 0.000 
Time*Time 0.00698 0.006977 1.17 0.285 
V*V 0.04695 0.046952 7.84 0.007 
2-Way interaction 0.00127 0.000634 0.11 0.900 
pH*Time 0.00014 0.000136 0.02 0.881 
Time*V 0.00093 0.000934 0.16 0.695 
Error 51 0.30540 0.005988   
Lack-of-fit 47 0.30538 0.006497 1,155.10 0.07 
Pure error 0.00002 0.000006   
Total 59 1.76000    
SourceDFAdj SSAdj MSF-ValueP-Value
Model 1.45460 0.181825 30.36 0.000 
Linear 0.19408 0.064692 10.80 0.000 
pH 0.08868 0.088684 14.81 0.000 
Time 0.02001 0.020006 3.34 0.043 
0.05879 0.058787 9.82 0.003 
Square 0.83426 0.278087 46.44 0.000 
pH*pH 0.75944 0.759440 126.82 0.000 
Time*Time 0.00698 0.006977 1.17 0.285 
V*V 0.04695 0.046952 7.84 0.007 
2-Way interaction 0.00127 0.000634 0.11 0.900 
pH*Time 0.00014 0.000136 0.02 0.881 
Time*V 0.00093 0.000934 0.16 0.695 
Error 51 0.30540 0.005988   
Lack-of-fit 47 0.30538 0.006497 1,155.10 0.07 
Pure error 0.00002 0.000006   
Total 59 1.76000    
Figure 6

Response surface plot of optimal condition of removal of AN.

Figure 6

Response surface plot of optimal condition of removal of AN.

Close modal
Figure 7

Response surface plot of optimal condition of removal of COD.

Figure 7

Response surface plot of optimal condition of removal of COD.

Close modal
Regression equation of AN
formula
(7)
Regression equation of COD
formula
(8)
  • In this work, EC and EC-sonication combined was investigated for the removal of ammoniacal nitrogen and COD from dye intermediate wastewater.

  • A set of experiment, by varying pH between 5 and 11, applied voltage from 0.5 to 4 V for an electrode area of 18 cm2 and electrolysis time up to 120 min was performed. The minimum fraction remaining (C/C0) were 0.244 and 0.302, respectively, for COD and AN, at electrolysis time of 90 min, pH 7 and applied voltage of 2 V.

  • ANOVA and response surface methodology were used for estimating optimum conditions for achieving maximum removal efficiency.

  • The optimal values of pH, time and voltage was ∼8.2, ∼90.9 min and ∼2.6 V, respectively, for AN and ∼7.6, ∼100.9 min and ∼2.6 V respectively for COD removal.

  • In addition, experiments with combination of two processes: electrocoagulation and sonication, for the removal of AN and COD from dye intermediate wastewater was also performed.

  • The removal efficiency was inferred using such experimental data only. The C/C0 for COD and AN after EC-sonication process were 0.145 and 0.228, respectively, with a post EC-sonication time 60 min at a frequency of 33 kHz.

  • The specific energy consumption for EC process was 2.01 kWh/m3 and for sonication process for COD and AN was 0.1731 kWh/kg and 3.8845 kWh/kg, respectively.

  • The optimum cost of the process depends on the applied voltage, electrolysis time, cost of the reactor, cost of electrodes, mixing cost, etc. for the electrocoagulation process. The operating cost of the process is computed to be 0.711 USD/m3 of the wastewater treatment.

  • It can be concluded that the application of both the processes, i.e., EC and sonication process, is effective for removing COD and AN from dye intermediate manufacturing wastewater. The sludge has been characterised and the metallic elements with the abundance of C > O > N > Cl > Cu > Fe > Al was observed.

  • As the dye wastewater is highly concentrated with some traces of heavy metals, the recovery/treatment of heavy metals can be suggested. Further detailed characterization and disposal of sludge can be extended for future studies.

We would like to convey our gratification to Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India for their support and financial assistance (Reference No- SR/WOS-A/ET-89/2017).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Akkaya
G. K.
,
Erkan
H. S.
,
Sekman
E.
,
Top
S.
,
Karaman
H.
,
Bilgili
M. S.
&
Engin
G. O.
2019
Modeling and optimizing Fenton and electro-Fenton processes for dairy wastewater treatment using response surface methodology
.
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
16
(
5
),
2343
2358
.
Al-Qodah
Z.
,
Al-Shannag
M.
,
Bani-Melhem
K.
,
Assirey
E.
,
Yahya
M. A.
&
Al-Shawabkeh
A.
2018
Free radical-assisted electrocoagulation processes for wastewater treatment
.
Environ. Chem. Lett.
16
(
3
),
695
714
.
Aoudj
S.
,
Khelifa
A.
,
Drouiche
N.
,
Hecini
M.
&
Hamitouche
H.
2010
Electrocoagulation process applied to wastewater containing dyes from textile industry
.
Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif.
49
(
11
),
1176
1182
.
Baran
W.
,
Adamek
E.
,
Jajko
M.
&
Sobczak
A.
2018
Removal of veterinary antibiotics from wastewater by electrocoagulation
.
Chemosphere
194
,
381
389
.
Bashir
M. J.
,
Mau Han
T.
,
Jun Wei
L.
,
Choon Aun
N.
&
Abu Amr
S. S.
2016
Polishing of treated palm oil mill effluent (POME) from ponding system by electrocoagulation process
.
Water Sci. Technol.
73
(
11
),
2704
2712
.
Bezerra
M. A.
,
Santelli
R. E.
,
Oliveira
E. P.
,
Villar
L. S.
&
Escaleira
L. A.
2008
Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry
.
Talanta
76
(
5
),
965
977
.
Boudjema
N.
,
Drouiche
N.
,
Abdi
N.
,
Grib
H.
,
Lounici
H.
,
Pauss
A.
&
Mameri
N.
2014
Treatment of Oued El Harrach river water by electrocoagulation noting the effect of the electric field on microorganisms
.
J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.
45
(
4
),
1564
1570
.
Candido
L.
&
Gomes
J. A. C. P.
2011
Evaluation of anode materials for the electro-oxidation of ammonia and ammonium ions
.
Mater. Chem. Phys.
129
(
3
),
1146
1151
.
Chu
J. Y.
,
Li
Y. R.
,
Li
N.
&
Huang
W. H.
2012
Treatment of car-washing wastewater by electrocoagulation-ultrasound technique for reuse
.
Adv. Mater. Res.
433–440
.
Trans Tech Publi. Ltd.
, pp.
227
232
.
Damaraju
M.
,
Bhattacharyya
D.
&
Kurilla
K. K.
2017
Removal of recalcitrant carbon from an industrial wastewater using electrocoagulation
.
Int. J. Civ. Eng.
15
(
4
),
697
703
.
Daneshvar
N.
,
Oladegaragoze
A.
&
Djafarzadeh
N.
2006
Decolorization of basic dye solutions by electrocoagulation: an investigation of the effect of operational parameters
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
129
(
1–3
),
116
122
.
Deghles
A.
&
Kurt
U.
2016
Treatment of tannery wastewater by a hybrid electrocoagulation/electro dialysis process
.
Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif.
104
,
43
50
.
Dong
Y.
,
Qu
Y.
,
Li
C.
,
Han
X.
,
Ambuchi
J. J.
,
Liu
J.
,
Yu
Y.
&
Feng
Y.
2017
Simultaneous algae-polluted water treatment and electricity generation using a biocathode-coupled electrocoagulation cell (bio-ECC)
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
340
,
104
112
.
Elabbas
S.
,
Ouazzani
N.
,
Mandi
L.
,
Berrekhis
F.
,
Perdicakis
M.
,
Pontvianne
S.
,
Pons
M.-N.
,
Lapicque
F.
&
Leclerc
J. P.
2016
Treatment of highly concentrated tannery wastewater using electrocoagulation: influence of the quality of aluminium used for the electrode
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
319
,
69
77
.
Ghernaout
D.
&
Ghernaout
B.
2012
Sweep flocculation as a second form of charge neutralisation – a review
.
Desalin. Water Treat.
44
(
1–3
),
15
28
.
Ghernaout
D.
,
Badis
A.
,
Kellil
A.
&
Ghernaout
B.
2008
Application of electrocoagulation in Escherichia coli culture and two surface waters
.
Desalination
219
(
1–3
),
118
125
.
Gonzalez-Merchan
C.
,
Genty
T.
,
Bussière
B.
,
Potvin
R.
,
Paquin
M.
,
Benhammadi
M.
&
Neculita
C. M.
2016
Influence of contaminant to hydrogen peroxide to catalyzer molar ratio in the advanced oxidation of thiocyanates and ammonia nitrogen using Fenton-based processes
.
J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
4
(
4
),
4129
4136
.
Guo
Y.
,
Xue
Q.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Wang
N.
,
Chang
S.
,
Wang
H.
,
Panh
H.
&
Chen
H.
2018
Treatment of real benzene dye intermediates wastewater by the Fenton method: characteristics and multi-response optimization
.
RSC Adv.
8
(
1
),
80
90
.
Hayat
H.
,
Mahmood
Q.
,
Pervez
A.
,
Bhatti
Z. A.
&
Baig
S. A.
2015
Comparative decolorization of dyes in textile wastewater using biological and chemical treatment
.
Sep. Purif. Technol.
154
,
149
153
.
Hua
I.
&
Hoffmann
M. R.
1997
Optimization of ultrasonic irradiation as an advanced oxidation technology
.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
31
(
8
),
2237
2243
.
Izadi
A.
,
Hosseini
M.
,
Najafpour Darzi
G.
,
Nabi Bidhendi
G.
&
Pajoum Shariati
F.
2018
Treatment of paper-recycling wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminum and iron electrodes
.
J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng.
16
(
2
),
257
264
.
Kabdaşlı
I.
,
Arslan-Alaton
I.
,
Ölmez-Hancı
T.
&
Tünay
O. J. E. T. R.
2012
Electrocoagulation applications for industrial wastewaters: a critical review
.
Environ. Technol. Rev.
1
(
1
),
2
45
.
Khandegar
V.
&
Saroha
A. K.
2013
Electrocoagulation for the treatment of textile industry effluent–a review
.
J. Environ. Manage.
128
,
949
963
.
Kovatcheva
V. K.
&
Parlapanski
M. D.
1999
Sono-electrocoagulation of iron hydroxides
.
Colloids Surf., A
149
(
1–3
),
603
608
.
Li
L.
&
Liu
Y.
2009
Ammonia removal in electrochemical oxidation: mechanism and pseudo-kinetics
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
161
(
2–3
),
1010
1016
.
Li
X.
,
Chen
S.
,
Angelidaki
I.
&
Zhang
Y.
2018
Bio-electro-Fenton processes for wastewater treatment: advances and prospects
.
Chem. Eng. J.
354
,
492
506
.
Lu
J.
,
Zhuo
Q.
,
Ren
X.
,
Qiu
Y.
,
Li
Y.
,
Chen
Z.
&
Huang
K.
2022
Treatment of wastewater from adhesive-producing industries by electrocoagulation and electrochemical oxidation
.
Process Saf. Environ. Prot.
157
,
527
536
.
Mamelkina
M. A.
,
Tuunila
R.
,
Sillänpää
M.
&
Häkkinen
A.
2019
Systematic study on sulphate removal from mining waters by electrocoagulation
.
Sep. Purif. Technol.
216
,
43
50
.
Manikandan
S.
,
Saraswathi
R.
&
Ansari
A. M. S.
2018
Effect of pH and electrolysis time on removal of reactive black B dye by electrochemical treatment
.
Asian J. Eng. Appl. Technol.
7
(
S1
),
45
47
.
Mohammadi
A.
,
Khadir
A.
&
Tehrani
R. M.
2019a
Optimization of nitrogen removal from an anaerobic digester effluent by electrocoagulation process
.
J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
7
(
3
),
103195
.
Mohammadi
H.
,
Alinejad
A.
,
Khajeh
M.
,
Darvishmotevalli
M.
,
Moradnia
M.
,
Tehrani
A. M.
,
Zare
R. M.
&
Mengelizadeh
N.
2019b
Optimization of the 3D electro-Fenton process in removal of acid orange 10 from aqueous solutions by response surface methodology
.
J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
94
(
10
),
3158
3171
.
Mollah
M. Y. A.
,
Schennach
R.
,
Parga
J. R.
&
Cocke
D. L.
2001
Electrocoagulation (EC)—science and applications
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
84
(
1
),
29
41
.
Ozay
Y.
,
Ünşar
E. K.
,
Işık
Z.
,
Yılmaz
F.
,
Dizge
N.
,
Perendeci
N. A.
&
Yalvac
M.
2018
Optimization of electrocoagulation process and combination of anaerobic digestion for the treatment of pistachio processing wastewater
.
J. Cleaner Prod.
196
,
42
50
.
Phan
T. N.
,
Van Truong
T. T.
,
Ha
N. B.
,
Nguyen
P. D.
,
Bui
X. T.
,
Dang
B. T.
,
Doan
V. T.
,
Park
J.
,
Guo
W.
&
Ngo
H. H.
2017
High rate nitrogen removal by ANAMMOX internal circulation reactor (IC) for old landfill leachate treatment
.
Bioresour. Technol.
234
,
281
288
.
Quan
X.
,
Wang
F.
,
Zhao
Q.
,
Zhao
T.
&
Xiang
J.
2009
Air stripping of ammonia in a water-sparged aerocyclone reactor
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
170
(
2–3
),
983
988
.
Raschitor
A.
,
Fernandez
C. M.
,
Cretescu
I.
,
Rodrigo
M. A.
&
Cañizares
P.
2014
Sono-electrocoagulation of wastewater polluted with Rhodamine 6G
.
Sep. Purif. Technol.
135
,
110
116
.
Sen
S.
,
Prajapati
A. K.
,
Bannatwala
A.
&
Pal
D.
2019
Electrocoagulation treatment of industrial wastewater including textile dyeing effluent–a review
.
Desalin. Water Treat.
161
(
1
),
21
34
.
Shahedi
A.
,
Darban
A. K.
,
Taghipour
F.
&
Jamshidi-Zanjani
A.
2020
A review on industrial wastewater treatment via electrocoagulation processes
.
Curr. Opin. Electrochem.
22
,
154
169
.
Soliman
M.
&
Eldyasti
A.
2018
Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria (AOB): opportunities and applications – a review
.
Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol.
17
(
2
),
285
321
.
Syam-Babu
D.
,
Anantha Singh
T. S.
,
Nidheesh
P. V.
&
Suresh Kumar
M.
2020
Industrial wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation process
.
Sep. Sci. Technol.
55
(
17
),
3195
3227
.
Tanatti
N. P.
,
Şengil
İ. A.
&
Özdemir
A.
2018
Optimizing TOC and COD removal for the biodiesel wastewater by electrocoagulation
.
Appl. Water Sci.
8
(
2
),
1
10
.
Veli
S.
,
Özbay
İ.
,
Özbay
B.
,
Arslan
A.
&
Çebİ
E.
2018
Optimization of process variables for treatment of food industry effluents by electrocoagulation
.
Global. Nest J.
20
(
3
),
551
557
.
Villeneuve
L.
,
Alberti
L.
,
Steghens
J. P.
,
Lancelin
J. M.
&
Mestas
J. L.
2009
Assay of hydroxyl radicals generated by focused ultrasound
.
Ultrason. Sonochem.
16
(
3
),
339
344
.
Wagle
D.
,
Lin
C. J.
,
Nawaz
T.
&
Shipley
H. J.
2020
Evaluation and optimization of electrocoagulation for treating Kraft paper mill wastewater
.
J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
8
(
1
),
103595
.
Wang
J.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Vieira
C. L.
,
Wolfson
J. M.
,
Pingtian
G.
&
Huang
S.
2019
Review on the treatment of organic pollutants in water by ultrasonic technology
.
Ultrason. Sonochem.
55
,
273
278
.
Xavier
S.
,
Gandhimathi
R.
,
Nidheesh
P. V.
&
Ramesh
S. T.
2015
Comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous Fenton processes for the removal of reactive dye Magenta MB from aqueous solution
.
Desalin. Water Treat.
53
(
1
),
109
118
.
Yaseen
D. A.
&
Scholz
M.
2019
Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review
.
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
16
(
2
),
1193
1226
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data