Abstract
P-nitrophenol (PNP) is highly toxic and difficult to degrade, causing great harm to the ecological environment and human health. A two-stage bench-scale membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) was constructed to treat wastewater containing high concentration of PNP and the generated nitrogen without external organic carbon sources. The two reactors were supplied with oxygen and methane, respectively. O2-MBfR was used for the degradation of PNP and the improvement of wastewater biodegradability. CH4-MBfR was used for the total nitrogen (TN) removal treatment from O2-MBfR effluent. In this experiment, the performance of the two-stage MBfR process was evaluated and optimized by adjusting operational parameters (aeration pressure, HRT, and pH). Under the optimal operation parameters, the removal efficiencies of PNP (100 mg/L) and TN attained 89.70% and 69.24%, respectively, and the removal loads were 0.930 g·m−2·d−1 and 241.42 mg·m−2·d−1, respectively. The reactor was able to accommodate the concentrations of PNP up to 200–400 mg/L, and the reactor reached maximum efficiency throughout the process when the concentration of PNP in the wastewater was 250 mg/L. The removal rates of PNP and TN reached 95.0% and 69.48%, respectively, and the removal loads were 2.37 g·m−2·d−1 and 96.22 mg·m−2·d−1, respectively. This research provides a better solution for multi-MBfR to treat toxic industrial wastewater containing phenol, nitrophenol, and further TN removal, which would not release any air pollutants into the atmosphere.
HIGHLIGHTS
An original two-stage MBfR was successfully constructed with a stable operation effect.
The wastewater containing high concentration p-nitrophenol and nitrogen could be treated efficiently without external organic carbon sources.
The optimal operating parameters and the best threshold concentration of the two-stage MBfR were determined.
INTRODUCTION
P-nitrophenol (PNP) is a sort of fine organic chemical intermediate, which is widely used in pesticide, medicine, petrochemical, plastics, paint, dye, and anti-corrosion industries (Yang et al. 2014; Dong et al. 2015). PNP is highly toxic and difficult to be degraded in the ecological environment, which can be transferred and enriched in aquatic organisms (Wu et al. 2016). It has been listed as a priority pollutant by environmental protection departments in many countries. In recent years, it has become one of the research hotspots to explore the treatment technology of PNP and other phenolic wastewater.
At present, the main methods of treating wastewater containing PNP or other refractory organic are physical (Marília et al. 2021; Muhammad et al. 2021), chemical (Chen et al. 2021a; Zahra et al. 2021), and biological (Ananya & Apurba 2020; Priyanka & Apurba 2020; Ke et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021). Bioreactors are effective for the removal of organic contaminants at a comparatively low cost and become one of the hot topics of recent researches, as shown in Table 1. Multistage or coupled reactors are more suitable for treating high concentration PNP (>100 mg/L) wastewater. Low concentrations of PNP can be treated efficiently by single-stage bioreactors with high removal efficiencies of nitrogen. However, few studies have focused on the removal effect of nitrogen under high PNP loading. As shown in Table 2, the nitrogen removal efficiencies of refractory phenolic wastewater by bioreactors have been explored widely.
Reactor types . | Highest influent PNP . | PNP removal efficiency . | Nitrogen removal efficiency . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nitrifying sludge bioreactor | 10 mg/L | 99.9% | 99.5% | Li et al. (2020) |
Sequencing batch reactor | 40 mg/L | 98.7% | 94.9% | Liu (2020) |
Anaerobic migrating blanket reactor/aerobic completely stirred tank reactor | 100 mg/L | 96% | Sponza & Kuscu (2005) | |
Sieve plate tower biofilm reactor | 100 mg/L | 100% | 87% | Yuan (2020) |
Slurry bubble column | 128 mg/L | 100% | Salehi et al. (2010) | |
Sequencing batch reactor | 180 mg/L | 99% | Liu et al. (2007) | |
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket | 350 mg/L | 97% | Xu et al. (2013) | |
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor/bioelectrochemical system | 350 mg/L | 100% | Shen et al. (2014) | |
Two integrated membrane aerated bioreactor | 500 mg/L | 95.86% | 78.21% | Mei et al. (2019a) |
Anaerobic semi-fixed bed biofilms reactor | 540 mg/L | 98% | Chen et al. (2021b) |
Reactor types . | Highest influent PNP . | PNP removal efficiency . | Nitrogen removal efficiency . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nitrifying sludge bioreactor | 10 mg/L | 99.9% | 99.5% | Li et al. (2020) |
Sequencing batch reactor | 40 mg/L | 98.7% | 94.9% | Liu (2020) |
Anaerobic migrating blanket reactor/aerobic completely stirred tank reactor | 100 mg/L | 96% | Sponza & Kuscu (2005) | |
Sieve plate tower biofilm reactor | 100 mg/L | 100% | 87% | Yuan (2020) |
Slurry bubble column | 128 mg/L | 100% | Salehi et al. (2010) | |
Sequencing batch reactor | 180 mg/L | 99% | Liu et al. (2007) | |
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket | 350 mg/L | 97% | Xu et al. (2013) | |
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor/bioelectrochemical system | 350 mg/L | 100% | Shen et al. (2014) | |
Two integrated membrane aerated bioreactor | 500 mg/L | 95.86% | 78.21% | Mei et al. (2019a) |
Anaerobic semi-fixed bed biofilms reactor | 540 mg/L | 98% | Chen et al. (2021b) |
Wastewater types . | Reactor types . | Highest influent nitrogen . | Nitrogen removal efficiency . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenol wastewater | Sequencing batch reactor | NO3−-N 240 mg/L | 98% | Ma et al. (2007) |
Phenol wastewater | Anoxic suspension reactor | NO3−-N 2 g/L | 65% | Bajaj et al. (2010) |
ABS resin wastewater (containing organic nitrile and aromatic toxic compounds) | Cycling integrated bioreactor with gas-lift and microporrus-aeration | TN 89 mg/L | 60% | Zhu (2014) |
Formaldehyde and phenol wastewater | Anoxic upflow sludge blanket reactor | NO3−-N 400 mg/L | 98.4% | Eiroa et al. (2005) |
Coal gasification wastewater | Biological contactoxidation-Anaerobic hydrolysis acidification-anoxia-Membrane Bioreactor | NH3-N 79–94 mg/L | 93% − 95% | Zhao et al. (2016) |
Coking wastewater (containing refractory polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic compounds) | Sequential batch membrane bioreactor-Reverse osmosis | TN 114 mg/L | 96% | Wang et al. (2014) |
Wastewater types . | Reactor types . | Highest influent nitrogen . | Nitrogen removal efficiency . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenol wastewater | Sequencing batch reactor | NO3−-N 240 mg/L | 98% | Ma et al. (2007) |
Phenol wastewater | Anoxic suspension reactor | NO3−-N 2 g/L | 65% | Bajaj et al. (2010) |
ABS resin wastewater (containing organic nitrile and aromatic toxic compounds) | Cycling integrated bioreactor with gas-lift and microporrus-aeration | TN 89 mg/L | 60% | Zhu (2014) |
Formaldehyde and phenol wastewater | Anoxic upflow sludge blanket reactor | NO3−-N 400 mg/L | 98.4% | Eiroa et al. (2005) |
Coal gasification wastewater | Biological contactoxidation-Anaerobic hydrolysis acidification-anoxia-Membrane Bioreactor | NH3-N 79–94 mg/L | 93% − 95% | Zhao et al. (2016) |
Coking wastewater (containing refractory polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic compounds) | Sequential batch membrane bioreactor-Reverse osmosis | TN 114 mg/L | 96% | Wang et al. (2014) |
Membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) merges gas-transfer membranes with biofilms to remove water contaminants, which has the characteristics of bubble-free aeration and anisotropic mass transfer. In the study of MBfR, the types of aeration are divided into oxygen, hydrogen, and methane. The oxygen-based MBfR (O2-MBfR), also called MABR, has a unique layered structure, which presents aerobic, anoxic, and anaerobic layers. Organic matter can be degraded efficiently in the unique layered structures. Currently, O2-MBfR has been utilized by many researchers on wastewater with poor biodegradability (Grimberg et al. 2000; Lan et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2020). Lai et al. (2017) developed a O2-MBfR to treat Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) wastewater (400 mg/L) and the removal rate could achieve 98%. Additionally, CH4-MBfR not only has the advantage of foamless aeration and counter-diffusional biofilm but also can considerably improve the mass transfer performance of methane. CH4-MBfR has been widely used in the enrichment and application researches of denitrifying methane anaerobic oxidation (DAMO) microorganisms (Xie et al. 2017). DAMO bacteria can use methane as a carbon source to convert nitrates produced by anammox into nitrites without additional organic carbon sources. Xie et al. (2018) integrated anammox and DAMO in MBfR, and the nitrogen removal efficiency was as high as 0.2 kgN·m−3·d−1, and the total nitrogen in the effluent was only 3 mg/L. Thus, CH4-MBfR is suitable for anaerobic total nitrogen removal of wastewater containing ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate (Chai et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2019). Nowadays, many researchers use multi-stage MBfR to degrade pollutants with high concentrations (>100 mg/L) of phenolic compounds (Mei et al. 2019a; Tian et al. 2019). Biodegradation involving both anaerobic and aerobic processes is more efficient at phenolic pollutants. Anaerobic acidification can enhance the biodegradability of phenol and reduce the toxicity to bacteria. Aerobic oxidation can lead to further mineralization of phenol (Huang et al. 2016; Mei et al. 2019b). Multi-stage MBfR also solves the serious bubbling problem in the aerobic biodegradation of phenolic pollutants by traditional methods, which impact the treatment efficiency due to uncontrolled loss of biomass. Moreover, since nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria are easily poisoned by phenolic compounds (Wang et al. 2018), a multi-stage reactor can obtain simultaneous high concentrations of toxic pollutants and nitrogen removal. Tian et al. (2019) developed a two-stage bench-scale O2-MBfR (specific surface: 66.2 m2/m3 in each reactor) to treat wastewater containing the o-aminophenol (OAP) concentration of 1,179 mg/L. The results showed that reactor-1 could achieve a removal rate of 17.6 g OAP/m2d and reactor-2 could achieve more than 90% TN removal with external organic carbon sources. The integrated system removed OAP and nitrogen compounds effectively. The reason might that the additional organic carbon sources were essential for degradation, according to the previous studies (Lan et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2020). Mei et al. (2019a) constructed two integrated O2-MBfR systems with anoxic and aerated zones treating wastewater containing high levels of PNP. The biological carriers were polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane (specific surface: 201.14 m2/m3) and ceramsite with the input of organic matter. When the inlet concentration of PNP was 500 mg/L, the average removal efficiencies of PNP and TN were 95.86% and 78.21%, respectively. The results suggested that the two integrated O2-MBfR systems had the ability to degrade PNP effectively, but the denitrification ability required further research, and the addition of biological carriers led to high operation costs.
There are few researches on the advanced treatment for high PNP concentrations (>100 mg/L) without additional organic sources. Studies on the tolerance of MBfR under high impact load are limited. To efficiently achieve the simultaneous high concentrations of PNP removal and TN removal without external organic carbon sources, an original two-stage MBfR system was constructed. The two reactors were supplied with oxygen and methane, respectively. O2-MBfR was used for the degradation of PNP, the improvement of biodegradability of wastewater, and the reduction of the burden on the subsequent reactor. CH4-MBfR was used for TN removal treatment of O2-MBfR effluent. The objectives of this work were to (i) evaluate the performance of O2-MBfR and CH4-MBfR combined process; (ii) explore the effects of the aeration pressure, HRT, pH and influent concentrations of PNP; (iii) determine the acceptable concentration and the threshold concentration of PNP which could be efficiently treated by the two-stage MBfR without additional organic carbon sources. This research provided a better solution for multi-MBfR to treat toxic industrial wastewater containing phenol, nitrophenol, and further TN removal, which would not release any air pollutants into the atmosphere.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reactor configurations and experimental design
Experimental wastewater and seed sludge
The synthetic PNP wastewater was prepared from distilled water added with PNP (Table 3), 0.41 g NaHCO3, 0.32 g KH2PO4, 0.41 g K2SO4, 0.5 g MgSO4, 0.28 g Na2CO3, 0.3 g Na2HPO4, 0.08 g ZnSO4, 0.55 g MnCl2, 0.25 g CuSO4, 0.12 g FeCl3-6H2O, 0.01 g NiCl2, 0.04 g CoCl2 and 0.04 g NaNO3 per liter. In order to ensure efficient TN removal of the subsequent system, the additional nutrients were added into the CH4-MBfR for DAMO microorganism: 1 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.27 g/L CaCl2·2H2O, 0.0091 g/L FeSO4·7H2O, 2 mL/L phosphate buffer solution, and 1 mL/L trace element solution. Phosphate buffer solution: 24.4 g/L KH2PO4 and 10.2 g Na2HPO4. Trace element solution: 2.486 g/L FeSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g/L MnCl2·4H2O, 0.05 g/L ZnCl2, 0.101 g/L NiSO4·6H2O, 0.05 g/L CoCl2·6H2O, 0.31 g/L CuSO4·5H2O and 0.026 g/LNa2MoO4. The reagents (PNP, C6H12O6, NaHCO3, KH2PO4, MgSO4, Na2CO3, Na2HPO4, NiCl2, CoCl2, CuSO4, MnCl2·4H2O, ZnCl2, CuSO4·5H2O) were supplied by Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory. The reagents (FeCl3-6H2O, MgSO4·7H2O, CaCl2·2H2O, FeSO4·7H2O, NiSO4·6H2O, CoCl2·6H2O, Na2MoO4) were provided by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. The reagents (K2SO4, ZnSO4, MnCl2) were supplied by Shenyang Dongxing Reagent Factory. CH3OH, CH3COOH and CH3COONH4 of high-performance liquid chromatography grade were supplied by Tianjin Yirenda Chemical Co., Ltd.
O2-MBfR . | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage . | Time (d) . | PNP (mg/L) . | COD (mg/L) . | NH4+-N (mg/L) . | Oxygen pressure (MPa) . | pH . | HRT (h) . | Temperature (°C) . |
1-S1(I) | 1–32 | 0–80 | 500–600 | 20–30 | 0.014 | 7.5 | 24 | 25 ± 2 |
1-S1(II) | 33–72 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.018 | 7.5 | 24 | 27 ± 2 |
1-S2 | 73–96 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.010–0.024 | 7.5 | 24 | 27 ± 2 |
1-S3 | 97–119 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.020 | 7.5 | 24–48 | 27 ± 2 |
1-S4 | 120–139 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.020 | 4.0–9.5 | 36 | 27 ± 2 |
CH4-MBfR . | ||||||||
Stage . | Time (d) . | PNP (mg/L) . | TN (mg/L) . | Methane pressure (MPa) . | pH . | HRT (h) . | Temperature (°C) . | . |
2-S1(I) | 140–171 | 0 | 30–35 | 0.06 | 7.5 | 24 | 30 ± 1 | |
2-S1(II) | 172–211 | 10–15 | 5–20 | 0.06 | 7.5 | 24 | 30 ± 1 | |
2-S2 | 212–299 | 10–15 | 10–16 | 0.01–0.11 | 7.5 | 24 | 30 ± 1 | |
2-S3 | 300–333 | 10–15 | 10–16 | 0.08 | 7.5 | 24–60 | 30 ± 1 |
O2-MBfR . | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage . | Time (d) . | PNP (mg/L) . | COD (mg/L) . | NH4+-N (mg/L) . | Oxygen pressure (MPa) . | pH . | HRT (h) . | Temperature (°C) . |
1-S1(I) | 1–32 | 0–80 | 500–600 | 20–30 | 0.014 | 7.5 | 24 | 25 ± 2 |
1-S1(II) | 33–72 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.018 | 7.5 | 24 | 27 ± 2 |
1-S2 | 73–96 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.010–0.024 | 7.5 | 24 | 27 ± 2 |
1-S3 | 97–119 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.020 | 7.5 | 24–48 | 27 ± 2 |
1-S4 | 120–139 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.020 | 4.0–9.5 | 36 | 27 ± 2 |
CH4-MBfR . | ||||||||
Stage . | Time (d) . | PNP (mg/L) . | TN (mg/L) . | Methane pressure (MPa) . | pH . | HRT (h) . | Temperature (°C) . | . |
2-S1(I) | 140–171 | 0 | 30–35 | 0.06 | 7.5 | 24 | 30 ± 1 | |
2-S1(II) | 172–211 | 10–15 | 5–20 | 0.06 | 7.5 | 24 | 30 ± 1 | |
2-S2 | 212–299 | 10–15 | 10–16 | 0.01–0.11 | 7.5 | 24 | 30 ± 1 | |
2-S3 | 300–333 | 10–15 | 10–16 | 0.08 | 7.5 | 24–60 | 30 ± 1 |
In this experiment, the inoculated sludge in O2-MBfR was taken from the activated sludge in the secondary sedimentation tank of Shenyang South Wastewater Treatment Plant, which had the advantages of good sedimentation and a high microbial concentration. The sludge volume index (SVI) and mixed liquid suspended solids (MLSS) were 65 mL/g and 3,550 mg/L, respectively. CH4-MBfR was inoculated with sludge containing functional DAMO bacteria. The special sludge was cultivated from the sediment at the bottom of the lake in Shenyang section of Hunhe River Basin, and had been cultured by the SBR reactor for 240 days in our laboratory.
Experimental method
This experiment adopted an intermittent operation mode. Firstly, during the performance optimization stage of the two-stage MBfR, the operating conditions and inlet quality are shown in Table 3. To make the microorganisms adapt to PNP, additional COD 500–600 mg/L and ammonium 20–30 mg/L were added in 1-S1 (I), and the concentrations of PNP gradually increased from 0 to 80 mg/L. In 1-S1 (II), stop adding organic carbon sources and nitrogen sources to make PNP the only organic carbon source, the reactor was operated stably for 40 days at the PNP concentration of 100 mg/L according to the previous study (Mei et al. 2019a). The performance of O2-MBfR was optimized by adjusting the oxygen pressure (0.010, 0.016, 0.020, 0.024 MPa) in 1-S2, HRT (24, 36, 48 h) in 1-S3 and pH (4.0, 6.0, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5) in 1-S4. Under the optimal operation conditions of O2-MBfR, the CH4-MBfR membrane hanging was operated with methane supplying. CH4-MBfR gradually stabilized after a long time in 2-S1. CH4-MBfR operation parameters were adjusted by changing the methane pressure (0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.08, 0.09, 0.11 MPa) in 2-S2 and HRT (24, 36, 48, 60 h) in 2-S3. After the optimal operating parameters of the two-stage MBfR were determined, the high concentrations operation experiment was conducted as shown in Table 4 to investigate the maximum concentration limit of PNP which could be treated efficiently by the two-stage MBfR.
Reactor . | Time (d) . | PNP (mg/L) . | TN (mg/L) . | Gas pressure (MPa) . | pH . | HRT (h) . | Temperature (°C) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O2-MBfR | 334–452 | 200–400 | 0 | 0.02 | 7.5 | 36 | 27 ± 2 |
CH4-MBfR | 379–452 | 0–110 | 5–35 | 0.08 | 7.5 | 36 | 30 ± 1 |
Reactor . | Time (d) . | PNP (mg/L) . | TN (mg/L) . | Gas pressure (MPa) . | pH . | HRT (h) . | Temperature (°C) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O2-MBfR | 334–452 | 200–400 | 0 | 0.02 | 7.5 | 36 | 27 ± 2 |
CH4-MBfR | 379–452 | 0–110 | 5–35 | 0.08 | 7.5 | 36 | 30 ± 1 |
During the experiment, digestion device (DR 200, Hashing of America Inc.) TN was determined by the potassium persulfate method (N/C3100, Analytik Jena AG Inc.); DO was determined by the DO probe of a multi-parameter water quality analyzer (HANNA HI98193, Hana Instruments Inc.); pH value was determined by the pH probe (FEP20, Mettler Toleadedo Inc.); electric thermostatic water bath (HHS, Shanghai Boxun Industrial Co., Ltd); centrifuge (H1850, Xiangyi Centrifuge Instrument Co. Ltd); PNP was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1200 Infinity Series, Agilent Technology Co., Ltd). The chromatographic conditions were as follows: column: ZORBAX SB-C18 (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm); column temperature: 30 °C; ultraviolet detector injection volume: 20 μL. The mobile phase consisted of (40%) methanol and (60%) acetic acid-ammonium acetate (0.1 mol/L). The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min, and the detection wavelength was 254 nm.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
O2-MBfR process
Biofilm formation and acclimation
Optimization of O2-MBfR system
CH4-MBfR process
Biofilm formation and acclimation
Optimization of CH4-MBfR system
Under the optimal operating parameters of the O2-MBfR, the CH4-MBfR optimal methane pressure in 2-S3 and HRT in 2-S4 were investigated. As for pH in CH4-MBfR, DAMO bacteria have severe environmental requirements, resulting in difficulties in enrichment (Kampman et al. 2012; Bhattacharjee et al. 2016). Since the DAMO reaction process and its microflora were first reported in 2006, many experimental investigations have been carried out under the environmental conditions of pH 7.0–8.0 (Zhao et al. 2017). Some researchers studied the factors affecting the activity of DAMO flora and found that the optimal pH was about 7.6. Thus, in order to enrich DAMO bacteria and achieve a better operation effect of CH4-MBfR, the pH in CH4-MBfR was maintained at about 7.5.
O2-MBfR and CH4-MBfR performance in long-term
On days 334–354, due to the sudden increase of PNP concentrations from 100 to 200 mg/L, the efficiency of O2-MBfR was severely affected. In O2-MBfR, the average removal rate of PNP within 21 days was only 38.18%. Through a 14-day adaptation period (days 356–380), the removal rate of PNP in O2-MBfR recovered up to 93.69% and the effluent concentration of PNP was only 12.9 mg/L. After O2-MBfR attained a steady state (the residual concentrations of PNP less than 30 mg/L), the effluent was used for the CH4-MBfR inlet. After O2-MBfR was connected with CH4-MBfR, the TN removal efficiency by CH4-MBfR was 53.38% and the removal load was 77.96 mg·m−2·d−1. The results demonstrated that the two-stage MBfR could adapt to the high concentration of PNP (200 mg/L). The microorganisms cultured in two-stage MBfR had strong tolerance and could achieve considerable degradation efficiency.
Subsequently, the concentrations of the PNP inlet increased by a gradient of 50 mg/L. When the concentration of PNP was 250 mg/L, the two-stage MBfR achieved the best degradation effect in the entire process. The O2-MBfR effluent concentrations of PNP and TN were about 10–40 mg/L and 5–8 mg/L, respectively. The TN removal rate increased linearly after CH4-MBfR was stabilized. The two-stage MBfR was stable under this concentration with the removal efficiencies of PNP and TN being 95.00% and 69.48%, respectively and the removal load were up to 2.37 g·m−2·d−1 and 96.22 mg·m−2·d−1, respectively. The reactor realized synchronous and efficient removal of PNP and TN. The results established that the degradation of PNP exhibited close dependence on the TN removal. The appropriate concentration of PNP could be conducive to the TN removal process. With the increasing rate of PNP degradation in O2-MBfR, the nitrogen compounds produced increased as well, establishing that O2-MBfR could not only efficiently degrade PNP but also reduce the TN load of CH4-MBfR to a certain extent. Bacteria in CH4-MBfR could utilize the residual PNP as nitrogen sources and organic carbon sources to achieve efficient removal of TN. It was consistent with the report by Tian et al. (2019), in which OAP removal load achieved 7 g·m−2·d−1 and TN removal efficiency was above 90% by two-stage O2-MBfR. Compared with our experiment, the better effect might be due to the lower toxicity of OAP than PNP, resulting in less impact on microorganisms. Moreover, the additional carbon sources increased the biodegradability of wastewater.
However, when the concentration of PNP in the inlet abruptly increased to 300 mg/L, O2-MBfR was just affected slightly, and the removal rate of PNP decreased from 95.00% to 86.76%. While CH4-MBfR was greatly deteriorative, and the removal efficiency of TN dropped from 69.48% to 59.64%. O2-MBfR showed a strong shockproof ability. Nonetheless, DAMO bacteria in CH4-MBfR were sensitive to the environmental changes and susceptible to the toxic effects of PNP. On day 407, the removal rates of PNP and TN continuously decreased to 80.27% and 49.23%, respectively. After 9 days of adaptation, the removal rates of PNP and TN increased steadily up to 89.67% and 63.35%, respectively, suggesting that the two-stage MBfR had a tolerance to the high concentration of PNP (300 mg/L) to some extent. When the concentrations of PNP were adjusted to 350 and 400 mg/L, the performance of the two-stage MBfR gradually deteriorated, and the processing effect was not stable. O2-MBfR had a relatively slight impact, with the removal rates of PNP stabilizing in ranges of 70-88%, a similar result was observed by Mei et al. (2019a). But the removal rates were hard to recover. The effluent concentrations of PNP fluctuated at 40–100 mg/L. In this case, the TN removal efficiencies of CH4-MBfR were not ideal than the previous study (Mei et al. 2019a), with only 43.33% (350 mg/L PNP) and 27.04% (400 mg/L PNP) on average. Although the degradation efficiency of PNP in O2-MBfR was stable, the residual concentrations of PNP in effluent still increased noticeably. Resulting in the increase of TN concentration in O2-MBfR effluent which might increase the burden for CH4-MBfR. Moreover, the residual high concentrations of PNP would generate toxic effects on the DAMO bacteria. The system was not able to efficiently cope with wastewater at concentrations of (350 and 400 mg/L PNP). The previous study (Mei et al. 2019a) had a better threshold concentration (500 mg/L), and the removal rates of TN were about 20% higher than this experiment, which might be due to the addition of organic matter and ceramsite and the larger specific surface area of biofilm.
In conclusion, the performance of the two-stage MBfR treating high concentrations of PNP was relatively stable. The microorganisms cultured in two-stage MBfR had a strong tolerance and could utilize PNP as nitrogen sources and organic carbon sources to achieve efficient removals. The operational parameters (aeration pressure, HRT, and pH) were significant to the removal efficiency by two-stage MBfR. And the tolerance of microorganisms to PNP could be enhanced by exposing the membrane to higher acclimation concentrations. The results demonstrated that the tolerance of the two-stage MBfR could be improved by subjecting the reactor to the proper inlet PNP concentration at about 250 mg/L. At the concentrations above the threshold concentration (300–400 mg/L), the enhancement was insignificant due to the lower tolerance toward the high toxicity of PNP. The suboptimal growth below the threshold concentration was due to the lack of organics, whereas the decreased growth rate above the threshold concentration was attributed to the increasing substrate inhibition. Compared with previous studies, the addition of glucose indeed improved the degradation and denitrification efficiency of high concentrations of PNP. During the entire operation period, O2-MBfR could achieve an efficient removal effect while CH4-MBfR was very limited by high concentrations of PNP since the microbial activity of the system was difficult to recover. The lack of organic carbon source in the reactor also led to the limitation of the system. In this experiment, the PNP and TN removal efficiencies could be further improved through (1) elevating MLVSS or exposing the activated sludge to higher acclimated concentrations; (2) integrating O2-MBfR with other pretreatment links or other subsequent nitrogen removal processes, also other fillers or carriers can be added into O2-MBfR to improve the nitrogen removal performance of the reactor; (3) adding additional carbon sources in order to improve microbial activity. Further investigations should be carried out: (1) the process of nitrification and denitrification in the two-stage MBfR to evaluate the mechanism of nitrogen conversion; (2) high-throughput sequencing to analyze the biofilm community structure and explore the PNP degradation pathway in MBfR.
CONCLUSIONS
In this experiment, a two-stage MBfR process was successfully constructed to treat wastewater containing high concentrations of PNP and nitrogen without external organic carbon sources. O2-MBfR achieved high PNP removal rates and effective organic mineralization, while CH4-MBfR performed advanced nitrogen removal from the O2-MBfR effluent. The optimal operating parameters of the reactor were determined. The aeration pressure, HRT, and pH in O2-MBfR were 0.020 MPa, 36 h, and 7.5, respectively, and in CH4-MBfR were 0.080 MPa, 36 h, and 7.5, respectively. Under the optimal operation parameters, the removal efficiencies of PNP (100 mg/L) and TN attained 89.70% and 69.24%, respectively, and the removal loads were 0.930 g·m−2·d−1 and 241.42 mg·m−2·d−1, respectively. Without additional organic carbon sources, the acceptable concentration (200–400 mg/L) and the threshold concentration (250 mg/L) of the two-stage MBfR were confirmed. Under the threshold concentration, the removal rates of PNP and TN reached 95.0% and 69.48%, respectively, and the removal loads were 2.37 g·m−2·d−1 and 96.22 mg·m−2·d−1, respectively. This study lays the groundwork for further research about the practical application of the integrated system treating toxic industrial wastewater containing phenol, nitrophenol, and further TN removal.
CREDIT AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Jiayi Tong: Methodology, formal analysis, writing – original draft, software. Li Cui: Funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, validation. Danqi Wang: Resources, data curation, conceptualization. Xin Wang: Visualization, writing – review & editing. Zhaokun Liu: Data curation, software.
DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This research was financially supported by Funding of Department of Science and Technology, Liaoning Province (No. 2017308002) and Funding of Science and Technology Bureau, Shenyang City (No. RC180110). The authors gratefully acknowledge the reviewers for valuable insights and suggestions.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.