Membrane-free electrodeionization (MFEDI) technology involves in situ electric regeneration of ion exchange resin, and is used to efficiently purify copper-containing wastewater, so that both the wastewater and copper may be reused. The electrode is the core functional component of a MFEDI system. Electrode-selection greatly influences the electric regeneration efficiency, water recovery and energy consumption of MFEDI processes. In this study, a graphene composite electrode was developed to improve MFEDI-system performance. A graphene composite electrode and conventional platinum-plated titanium electrode were both characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrochemical testing. Furthermore, the treatment and electrical regeneration properties of MFEDI systems with these two electrodes were investigated. The specific surface area of the electrode increased after graphene loading, while the oxygen evolution potential decreased. Wastewater treatment experiments demonstrated that MFEDI systems with graphene composite electrodes effectively removed copper from wastewater. The study also highlighted that the electroregeneration efficiency of the MFEDI system was improved by loading with graphene; the average copper concentration in the regeneration solution increased by 1.4 times to 50.4 mg/L, while the energy consumption decreased from 1.55 to 1.48 kWh/m3, and the water recovery rate increased from 85 to 90%.

  • MFEDI with graphene composite electrode has been proposed and tested for purification of copper containing wastewater.

  • The effluent conductivity was below 1.0 μS/cm.

  • Precipitation was prevented and effective regeneration was obtained.

  • The energy consumption decreased from 1.55 to 1.48 kWh/m3 and the water recovery rate increased from 85 to 90%.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Because of its excellent thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as high ductility, copper has been widely used in electroplating, metallurgy, machining, wire production, and other applications (Jiang et al. 2015; Kilany et al. 2020). These industrial processes produce a large amount of copper-containing wastewater, which has become a major industrial and environmental concern. Unlike organic matter, copper-containing pollutants do not degrade and can migrate into the biosphere through the food chain, eventually accumulating in the human body and causing irreversible damage (Shao et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2021). Copper can irritate the human central nervous system and cause cancer (Choi et al. 2020a). Nevertheless, copper is a precious resource. Therefore, the economical, effective treatment and reuse of copper-containing wastewater, along with copper recovery, are of great significance for preserving the safety of the environment, conserving natural resources, and protecting human health.

Many technologies have been adopted to remove copper from wastewater, including adsorption (Khan et al. 2021), chemical precipitation (Luna et al. 2020), membrane separation (Zhao et al. 2019; Li et al. 2021) and ion exchange (Ulloa et al. 2020; Yan et al. 2020). Adsorption is effective in treating low-copper effluents, however, the disposal of exhausted adsorbents is expensive (Hao et al. 2022). Chemical precipitation is a widely used method for treating wastewater that contains copper ion. The investment and operating costs of this method are low (Mark et al. 2020), but the treated effluent cannot meet discharge requirements, so further in-depth treatment is required to purify the water well enough to reuse it. Membrane separation is the most commonly used advanced-treatment technology; other examples include electrodeionization (Feng et al. 2007; Mahmoud & Hoadley 2012) and electrodialysis (Simona et al. 2015; Scarazzato et al. 2017). Membranes can remove almost all of the ions from wastewater, through either standalone or combined treatment. However, this method requires ion-exchange membranes, which are expensive and prone to membrane pollution, concentration polarization, and scaling (Ma et al. 2020). Ion-exchange technology has the advantages of good treatment effectiveness (Hamdaoui 2009; Choi et al. 2020b; Wołowicz & Hubicki 2020) and low investment cost, and the failed ion-exchange resin can be regenerated with strong acids and bases. However, the regeneration operation is complicated, and a large volume of acid and alkali liquid waste is produced, which results in secondary pollution. Therefore, green regeneration of ion-exchange resins is a very compelling area of study.

In this research, membrane-free electrodeionization (MFEDI) technology was applied to the treatment of copper-containing wastewater for the first time. This technology allows the production of pure water and regeneration of resin to be alternated in the same resin column (Shen & Chen 2019); that is, after resin-operation failure, high voltage is used to induce water electrolysis and ionization, producing H+ and OH, and regenerating the resin. The regenerated ions are removed by water that flows from the top of the column to the bottom, and then the water is treated. This cycle repeats continuously. The entire process is green and pollution-free, since it does not require acid and alkali agents, or ion-exchange membranes.

However, the resin has a high copper adsorption capacity, which leads to low regeneration efficiency. In addition, hydroxide precipitation readily occurs during electric regeneration. To overcome these drawbacks, water electrolysis needs to be enhanced to produce more H+ for regeneration. Inspired by this, we developed a graphene composite electrode MFEDI for enhanced water electrolysis. Compared to a platinum-coated titanium electrode, a graphene composite electrode provides a larger specific surface area, with the possibility of decreasing the oxygen evolution potential, which means increased occurrence of the oxygen evolution reaction. The objectives of this research were to investigate the electrochemical properties of the graphene composite electrode we prepared, and examine its performance as an electrode used in a MFEDI system for purification of copper-containing wastewater.

Materials

A strong-acid cation resin (650C, Dow Chemical Company, Mitland, USA), weak-acid cation resin (D113, Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China), strong-base anion resin (550A, Dow Chemical Company, Mitland, USA), and weak-base anion resin (D301, Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China) were used in the experiments. The main properties of the resins are shown in Table 1. Both the anion and cation resins were chemically regenerated into R–OH and R–H types prior to use. The copper-containing wastewater, with a concentration of 5 mg/L, was prepared using chemically pure CuCl2 (99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China).

Table 1

The main properties of the resins

DesignationTypeCapacity (eq/L)Functional group
550A Gel-type strong-base anion exchange resin 1.0 Quaternary amine 
D301 Macroporous weak-base anion exchange resin 1.4 Tertiary amine 
650C Gel-type strong-acid cation exchange resin 2.0 Sulfonyl 
D113 Macroporous weak-acid cation exchange resin 4.3 Carboxyl 
DesignationTypeCapacity (eq/L)Functional group
550A Gel-type strong-base anion exchange resin 1.0 Quaternary amine 
D301 Macroporous weak-base anion exchange resin 1.4 Tertiary amine 
650C Gel-type strong-acid cation exchange resin 2.0 Sulfonyl 
D113 Macroporous weak-acid cation exchange resin 4.3 Carboxyl 

MFEDI device

The MFEDI device was constructed by cylindrical plexiglass (Figure 1). The exchange column (50 cm length and 3 cm diameter) was filled with ion-exchange resin. This study used a mixed-layer filling method. The lower 25 cm was filled with weak-acid and strong- base resins, while the upper 25 cm was filled with weak-base and strong-acid resins. The anion resin to cation resin ratio was 2:1. Mesh electrodes (3 cm diameter and 0.2 cm thickness) were used at both ends of the resin layer to evenly distribute water and prevent the resin from flowing out. The cathode and anode electrodes were fixed on a perforated plate to prevent electrodes deformation. A stainless-steel spring was used to compact the resin layer at the upper end. The MFEDI devices operated intermittently, which means the water treatment phase was alternated with the electric regeneration phase. During treatment, the wastewater passed through the resin layer from top to bottom at a flow rate of 7.1 L/h. When the conductivity of the treated effluent exceeded 1.0 μS/cm, the treatment was stopped and constant 1,500 V piezoelectric regeneration was carried out (the upper end is the anode and the lower end is the cathode). Deionised water passed through the resin layer from top to bottom at a flow rate of 7.1 L/h during this step. The regeneration time lasted 20 min.
Figure 1

MFEDI-device diagram, (a) purification stage; (b) electrical regeneration stage.

Figure 1

MFEDI-device diagram, (a) purification stage; (b) electrical regeneration stage.

Close modal

Conductivity examination

The conductivity-examination device was the same as the MFEDI device, except that the length of the resin bed was 2.5 cm. A voltage-current experiment was conducted to investigate the resistivity of different resin forms.

Electrode preparation

Both the platinum-plated titanium and graphene composite electrodes were prepared by thermal decomposition (Chen & Chen 2005). The titanium mesh was cleaned ultrasonically for 10 min, two or three times. The titanium mesh was etched in boiling 37% HCl for 2 min to remove impurities on the surface of the electrode, then cleaned ultrasonically again for 10 min, two or three times; and then dried under ambient conditions. The precursor solution for the platinum-plated titanium electrode was prepared by dissolving 0.5 M H2PtCl6·H2O (99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) in isopropanol solution, while the precursor solution for the graphene composite electrode was prepared by evenly mixing 1 g graphene and platinum-plated titanium electrode precursor solution. Next, the precursor solution was evenly brushed on the titanium-mesh substrate surface. The titanium-mesh matrix was then dried at 353 K for 3 min in an oven, transferred to a muffle furnace, and roasted at 673 K for 5 min, before being taken out and cooled under ambient conditions. Subsequently, the matrix was repeatedly brushed, dried, and roasted 8–10 times. Finally, this titanium-mesh substrate was placed in the muffle furnace and annealed for 1 h to complete electrode preparation.

Electrode characterization

The morphology of the electrode surface was characterized by SEM (SEM500, CIQTK, Hefei, China). The anode oxygen evolution behaviour was studied using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) with a scan rate of 0.02 V/s using an electrochemical workstation (PARSTART MC2273, AMETEK, USA). LSV was carried out in a three electrode configuration with a saturated calomel electrode as reference electrode, a platinum electrode as counter electrode, and the prepared electrode as working electrode.

Analysis

A high-voltage power supply (YT-DL, Nanjing Kenfan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China) was employed for electrical regeneration, operating with constant voltage. The pH and conductivity of various fractions were analyzed using a pH meter (PHS-2F, Rex, Shanghai, China) and a conductivity meter (IP67, Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland), respectively. The copper concentration was measured by flame atomic absorption spectrometer (TAS-990AFG, Persee, Beijing, China).

New resin treatment effectiveness

In order to avoid copper hydroxide precipitation, the resin bed was filled with mixed layers. The treatment effectiveness of chemically regenerated new resins is presented in Figure 2. The conductivity of treated effluent during the first 105 h was below 0.80 μs/cm, and then increased gradually, before reaching 1.22 μs/cm at 130 h. This increase in conductivity was due to more exhausted resins generated as the removal proceeded. The pH of the effluent remained in the neutral range, between 6.08 and 7.37. As the volume ratio of anion resin to cation resin (2:1) was equivalent to the capacity ratio (Table 1), same amount of anion ions and cation ions were adsorbed. This explained why the effluent pH was around neutral. During the entire treatment process, the copper concentration in the effluent was lower than the limit of detection. These results indicated that the MFEDI device filled with mixed layers can effectively remove copper from wastewater.
Figure 2

Variations of pH and conductivity in the effluent with removal time when chemically regenerated new resins were packed in the MFEDI column.

Figure 2

Variations of pH and conductivity in the effluent with removal time when chemically regenerated new resins were packed in the MFEDI column.

Close modal

Performance of MFEDI device with platinum-plated titanium electrode

Electric regeneration performance

When the conductivity of the treated effluent was greater than 1.0 μs/cm, the resin was electrically regenerated with a constant voltage of 1,500 V, and a pair of anion and cation electrodes were placed at both ends of the resin layer. It is worth noting that platinum-plated titanium electrodes with excellent performance and wide application were used initially. Figure 3 shows the changes in current density, concentration of copper, and pH of the regeneration solution as functions of regeneration time during the process of electric regeneration.
Figure 3

Current density, pH, and copper concentration of the concentrate as a function of electric regeneration time when platinum-coated titanium electrode was installed in MFEDI device.

Figure 3

Current density, pH, and copper concentration of the concentrate as a function of electric regeneration time when platinum-coated titanium electrode was installed in MFEDI device.

Close modal

As shown in Figure 3, the regeneration solution (concentrate) was acidic, with a pH of approximately 3.8, due to more weak-base resins regenerated than weak-acid resins. The acidic concentrate can effectively prevent copper hydroxide precipitation.

The copper concentration in the regenerated solution was 47.3 mg/L at 2 min, then gradually decreased to 25.8 mg/L at 20 min. As regeneration progressed, the amount of copper adsorbed by the resin particles gradually decreased, and the copper concentration in the regeneration solution also decreased. However, the average copper concentration in the regeneration solution was only 35.0 mg/L; this may be due to the strong copper-adsorption capacity of the resin, making the resin difficult to regenerate. Furthermore, the regeneration current density was too low, which also leads to lower electric regeneration efficiency. The results above indicate low electric regeneration efficiency of the MFEDI column with the platinum-plated titanium electrode. The regeneration flow rate and time were used to calculate the total amount of regenerated copper, which was 82.8 mg.

Current density is an important factor for the electrical regeneration of the resins and energy consumption. Typically, electrical regeneration efficiency can be increased by increasing current density. However, current density was greatly influenced by the conductivity of the resin bed. As shown in Figure 3, the current density decreased gradually with the regeneration time, from 86 A/m2 initially to 69 A/m2 at 20 min. This is mainly due to the fact that after electric regeneration, a part of the cation exchange resins changed from R–Cu form to R–H form, and a part of the anion exchange resins changed from R–Cl form to R–OH form. The changes in the resin forms caused the resin-bed conductivity changes.

To investigate the conductivity of different resin forms, a voltage-current test was conducted and the resistance can be calculated by the current and the voltage. As can be observed from Figure 4, the resistance was 18.6 and 134.1 Ω for the strong-acid resins in R–H form and R–Cu form, respectively; 1,977.6 and 2,538.9 Ω for the weak-acid resins in R–H form and R–Cu form, respectively; 27.9 and 83.4 Ω for the strong-base resins in R–OH form and R–Cl form, respectively; and 1,191.5 and 343.3 Ω for weak-base resins in R–OH form and R–Cl form, respectively.
Figure 4

Variations of current with voltage for different resin forms: (a) strong-acid resin 650C, (b) weak-acid resin D113, (c) strong-base resin 550A, and (d) weak-base resin D301.

Figure 4

Variations of current with voltage for different resin forms: (a) strong-acid resin 650C, (b) weak-acid resin D113, (c) strong-base resin 550A, and (d) weak-base resin D301.

Close modal
The conductivity of different resin beds could be calculated by (1):
(1)
where C represents the conductivity, S/m; A represents the cross-sectional area, m2; Rm represents the resistance, Ω; and l represents the length, m. Figure 5 presents the conductivity of different resin beds. As shown, the conductivity was 1.9 and 0.3 S/m for strong-acid resins in R–H form and R–Cu form, respectively; 1.8 × 10−2 and 1.4 × 10−2 S/m for weak-acid resins in R–H form and R–Cu forms, respectively; 1.3 and 0.4 S/m for strong-base resins in R–OH form and R–Cl form, respectively; and 2.8 × 10−2 and 0.1 S/m for weak-base resins in R–OH form and R–Cl form, respectively.
Figure 5

Conductivities of different resin types.

Figure 5

Conductivities of different resin types.

Close modal

Obviously, the conductivity change of the packed resin has a significant influence on the current density. As shown in Figure 5, the conductivities were high for strong-acid resins and strong-base resins of all types, while those for weak-base resins and weak-acid resins were extremely low. As a result, the current density was determined by the weak-acid resins and weak-base resins. As the electrical regeneration proceeded, the conductivity of the weak-acid resins increased, while that for the weak-base resins decreased. Moreover, the composition of the acidic regeneration solution indicates more weak-base resins were regenerated than weak-acid resins. This explains why the current density decreased. To increase the current density, efforts should be focused on improving the regeneration efficiency of weak-acid resins.

Mechanism of electric regeneration

When high-voltage direct current is applied to both ends of the resin, the following electrolytic reactions occurs on the electrodes:
(2)
(3)
At the junction between the anion and cation resins, DC current can promote the occurrence of the following water ionization reaction:
(4)

The H+ and OH ions generated by the electrolytic and ionization reactions exchanged with the Cu2+ and Cl ions adsorbed by the cation and anion resins, respectively, thus regenerating the anion and cation resins. The higher the concentration of H+ and OH, the weaker the adsorption capacity of the resin for salt ions, and the higher the electric regeneration efficiency. Relevant studies (Shen & Chen 2019) have shown that the layered filling of anion and cation resins used in this study can effectively promote the water ionization reaction (3). Therefore, to further enhance the electric regeneration efficiency, it is important to promote the electrolytic reaction (1). Optimising the electrode performance is the most effective way to achieve this.

Treatment performance after electric regeneration

In order to investigate the treatment-performance of resin after electric regeneration, the treatment effectiveness of resin after electric regeneration using the MFEDI device with the platinum-plated titanium electrode was studied and is presented in Figure 6. As can be seen from Figure 6, after electric regeneration, the pH of the effluent treated by the resin remained neutral, and the copper concentration in the effluent was lower than the limit of detection. In addition, the conductivity of the treated effluent was less than 1.0 μs/cm, and the treatment time was 140 min. The total amount of copper adsorbed by the resin was 82.8 mg, as calculated from the treatment flow rate, which is consistent with the total amount of copper generated by electric regeneration. The results show that the resin adsorption properties can be completely recovered after electric regeneration.
Figure 6

Conductivity and pH of the effluent as a function of removal time when platinum-coated titanium electrode was installed in MFEDI device and the packed resins were electrically regenerated.

Figure 6

Conductivity and pH of the effluent as a function of removal time when platinum-coated titanium electrode was installed in MFEDI device and the packed resins were electrically regenerated.

Close modal

Performance of MFEDI device with graphene composite electrodes

The treatment and regeneration performance data of the MFEDI device with the platinum-plated titanium electrode demonstrated that MFEDI technology can be used for Cu2+-containing wastewater treatment, but it is necessary to develop a new electrode to improve the electric regeneration efficiency of weak-acid resin. Graphene has excellent physical and electrochemical properties, with a large specific surface area and abundant surface functional groups. After modification and reduction, a better-dispersed phase at the nanoscale forms on the original electrode surface, which significantly improves the electro-chemical performance of the electrode. Therefore, the development of a graphene composite electrode may greatly improve the performance of the MFEDI system.

Electrode surface morphology

Figure 7 shows the surface morphologies of the platinum-plated titanium and graphene composite electrodes. It can be observed that when platinum was deposited on the surface of the titanium electrode, it was in the shape of a porous film with uneven distribution. When the platinum-plated titanium electrode was loaded with graphene, a layer of flocculent material appeared on the electrode surface, with a relatively uniform distribution. These results demonstrate that the specific surface area of the electrode increased after loading with graphene, which provides the possibility for optimising electrochemical performance.
Figure 7

SEM images of the electrode surface: (a) platinum-coated titanium mesh electrode; and (b) graphene composite mesh electrode.

Figure 7

SEM images of the electrode surface: (a) platinum-coated titanium mesh electrode; and (b) graphene composite mesh electrode.

Close modal

Electrochemical characterization of the electrode

To explore the electrochemical properties of the platinum-plated titanium electrode and graphene composite electrode, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) tests on the two electrodes were performed. As shown in Figure 8, the current densities of both electrodes were approximately unchanged when the potential was between 1.10 and 1.60 V, indicating a low degree of polarisation. From 1.60 V, the electrode current densities increased sharply when the potential increased, due to the reaction after the current reached the oxygen evolution potential. To obtain the oxygen evolution potential values, a tangent line was drawn to the second part of the LSV curve of each of the two prepared electrodes. The intersection point of the tangent line and horizontal section of the curve provided the oxygen evolution potential value of the electrode in the corresponding solution. The oxygen evolution potential was less positive on the graphene composite electrode (1.61 V) than that on the platinum-plated titanium electrode (1.64 V), which was likely attributed to the larger specific surface area of the graphene composite electrode. The lower oxygen evolution potential on the graphene composite electrode suggests a higher probability for the oxygen evolution reaction and an increase in the generation of OH ions. This observation implied that when the MFEDI system was configured with graphene composite electrodes, larger quantities of H+ and OH ions were produced for resin regeneration from the electrolytic reaction.
Figure 8

LSV tests of the electrodes.

Figure 8

LSV tests of the electrodes.

Close modal

Electric regeneration performance

Figure 9 shows the electric regeneration effectiveness of the MFEDI system with graphene composite electrodes. It can be seen from Figure 9 that during the process of electric regeneration, the pH of the regeneration solution remained in the range 3.9–4.1, due to more weak-base resins regenerated than weak-acid resins. However, the regeneration solution pH was slightly higher than that of the MFEDI system with the platinum-plated titanium electrode, indicating relatively more weak-acid resin was regenerated. This was mainly because more H+ was generated from water electrolysis after loading graphene. No hydroxide precipitation was found during the entire process of electric regeneration.
Figure 9

The electric regeneration effectiveness of MFEDI system with graphene composite electrode: current density, pH, and copper concentration of the concentrate as a function of electric regeneration time when graphene composite electrodes were installed in the MFEDI device.

Figure 9

The electric regeneration effectiveness of MFEDI system with graphene composite electrode: current density, pH, and copper concentration of the concentrate as a function of electric regeneration time when graphene composite electrodes were installed in the MFEDI device.

Close modal

The copper concentration in the regeneration solution reduced slowly from 55.4 mg/L to 38.0 mg/L, owing to the decrease of copper ions in the resins with the regeneration. The average copper concentration after mixing the liquid from all of the regeneration cycles was 50.4 mg/L, which was 1.4 times that of the MFEDI device with platinum-plated titanium electrodes. This provided further evidence that the electrode performance was optimised after graphene loading, and the electric regeneration efficiency improved accordingly. The regeneration flow rate and time were used to calculate the total amount of regenerated copper, which was 119.3 mg. The concentrated regeneration solution could be fed to a pretreatment unit, such as reverse osmosis, so that the copper can be recovered after this concentrating process.

The current density decreased gradually, from 100 to 79 A/m2. which was higher than that of the MFEDI system with platinum-plated titanium electrodes. This can be explained by the acidic regeneration solution and the improved regeneration efficiency of the weak-acid resin. On the one hand, more weak-base resins were regenerated than weak-acid resins, and the conductivity of the resin bed reduced, leading to the decrease of the current density. On the other hand, water electrolysis was enhanced after loading graphene, and more H+ was produced in the anode to regenerate weak-acid resin. Consequently, the regeneration efficiency of the weak-acid resin improved, resulting in higher current density compared to MFEDI system with platinum-plated titanium electrodes.

Treatment performance after electric regeneration

After electric regeneration, the treatment performance of the resin was investigated. The relationships between the conductivity and pH of the treated effluent and the treatment time are shown in Figure 10. The treated effluent remained in the neutral range, because the capacities of the anion and cation exchange resins were equivalent. The effluent conductivity was as high as 0.70 μs/cm in the first 60 min; this might be attributed to partial retention of salt ions after electrical regeneration. However, the phenomenon gradually disappeared owing to the ion exchange of the resins, and resulted in a decrease of effluent conductivity at 80 min. Since then, the effluent conductivity increased and attained 1.0 μs/cm at 200 min, as the resins gradually become exhausted. Based on the treatment flow rate, the total amount of copper adsorbed by the resin was calculated to be 118.3 mg, which was equal to the amount of copper produced by electric regeneration, indicating that the resin adsorption properties were recovered after electric regeneration.
Figure 10

Variations of pH and conductivity in the effluent with removal time when graphene composite electrodes were installed in the MFEDI device and electrically regenerated resins were packed in the MFEDI column.

Figure 10

Variations of pH and conductivity in the effluent with removal time when graphene composite electrodes were installed in the MFEDI device and electrically regenerated resins were packed in the MFEDI column.

Close modal

Energy consumption and water recovery

Water recovery R can be calculated with the following formula:
(5)
where Q1 represents regeneration flow rate, L/h;Q2 represents treatment flow rate, L/h; t1 represents regeneration time, h; and t2 is treatment time, h. The water recovery rate of the MFEDI system with the graphene electrode was calculated to be 90% (Q1 = 7.1 L/h, Q2 = 7.1 L/h, t1 = 20 min and t2 = 200 min, respectively), while that with the platinum-coated titanium electrode was 85% (Q1 = 7.1 L/h, Q2 = 7.1 L/h, t1 = 20 min and t2 = 140 min, respectively).
System energy consumption E can be calculated with the following formula:
(6)
where represents average current, A; and U represents voltage, V. The energy consumption of the MFEDI system with the graphene electrode was calculated to be 1.48 kWh/m3, while that with the platinum-coated titanium electrode was 1.55 kWh/m3.

This work presented an improved MFEDI system capable of high electric regeneration efficiency and excellent purification performance in the treatment of copper-containing wastewater. The advantages of this system were attributed to the unique graphene composite electrode, which enabled a lower oxygen evolution potential and improved water electrolysis, due to the larger specific surface area of the electrode. The conductivity of the treated effluent was less than 1.0 μs/cm, indicating satisfactory treatment effectiveness. Compared to that of an MFEDI system with a platinum-coated titanium electrode, the average copper concentration in this system increased by 1.4 times to 50.4 mg/L, which demonstrates that the regeneration efficiency noticeably improved. The pH of the regeneration solution remained in the range of 3.9–4.1, and no hydroxide precipitation occurred during the entire process. The energy consumption of the system decreased from 1.55 to 1.48 kWh/m3, and the water recovery rate increased from 85 to 90%.

The MFEDI system with a graphene composite electrode produced a relatively low amount of harmful waste, and exhibited a high rate of copper and pure-water recovery, which are significant environmental and economic benefits. In addition, the system showed high electric regeneration efficiency, which reduced energy consumption and wastewater discharge, and avoided problems associated with ion-exchange membranes. These results confirmed the capabilities of the graphene composite electrode MFEDI system for achieving highly efficient copper removal and recovery from wastewater, which should increase the application of MFEDI for the treatment of copper-containing wastewater.

This work is supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ20B070004), and the Young Doctoral Innovation Fund of Ningbo Polytechnic (10600300300504). Additional support is provided by Open Project of Zhejiang Collaborative Innovation Center for High Value Utilization of Byproducts from Ethylene Project (NZXT2018309).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Choi
J. W.
,
Song
H. E.
&
Bediako
J. K.
2020b
Sequential recovery of gold and copper from bioleached wastewater using ion exchange resins
.
Environmental Pollution
266
,
115617
.
Feng
X.
,
Wu
Z. C.
&
Chen
X. F.
2007
Removal of metal ions from electroplating effluent by EDI process and recycle of purified water
.
Separation and Purification Technology
57
,
257
263
.
Jiang
T. S.
,
Liu
W. P.
,
Mao
Y. L.
&
Zhang
L.
2015
Adsorption behavior of copper ions from aqueous solution onto graphene oxide–CdS composite
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
259
,
603
610
.
Khan
J.
,
Lin
S. S.
,
Nizeyimana
J. C.
,
Wu
Y. F.
,
Wang
Q.
&
Liu
X. R.
2021
Removal of copper ions from wastewater via adsorption on modified hematite (α-Fe2O3) iron oxide coated sand
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
319
,
128687
.
Kilany
A. Y.
,
Nosier
S. A.
,
Hussein
M.
,
Abdel-Aziz
M. H.
&
Sedahmed
G. H.
2020
Combined oil demulsification and copper removal from copper plating plant effluents by electrocoagulation in a new cell design
.
Separation and Purification Technology
248
,
117056
.
Li
J. Y.
,
Ma
J. X.
,
Dai
R. B.
,
Wang
X. Y.
,
Chen
M.
,
Waite
T. D.
&
Wang
Z. W.
2021
Self-enhanced decomplexation of Cu-organic complexes and Cu recovery from wastewaters using an elecctrochemical membrane filtration system
.
Environmental Science and Technology
55
,
655
664
.
Liu
L. H.
,
Lin
X. A.
,
Luo
L. Z.
,
Yang
J.
,
Luo
J. L.
,
Liao
X.
&
Cheng
H. X.
2021
Biosorption of copper ions through microalgae from piggery digestate: optimization, kinetic, isotherm and mechanism
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
319
,
128724
.
Ma
J. Z.
,
Xia
M. Z.
&
Zhu
S. D.
2020
A new alendronate doped HAP nanomaterial for Pb2+, Cu2+ and Cd2+ effect absorption
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
400
,
123143
.
Scarazzato
T.
,
Panossian
T.
&
Tenorio
J. A. S.
2017
A review of cleaner production in electroplating industries using electrodialysis
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
168
,
1590
1602
.
Shao
Y. Y.
,
Gao
Y.
,
Yue
Q. Y.
,
Kong
W. J.
,
Gao
B. Y.
,
Wang
W. G.
&
Jiang
W. Q.
2020
Degradation of chlortetracycline with simultaneous removal of copper (II) from aqueous solution using wheat straw-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
379
,
122384
.
Simona
C.
,
Mihai
C. C.
&
Violeta
P.
2015
San copolymer membranes with ion exchangers for Cu(II) removal from synthetic wastewater by electrodialysis
.
Journal of Environmental Science
35
,
27
37
.
Ulloa
L.
,
Minchero
M. M.
,
Bringas
E.
,
Cobl
A.
&
Roman
M. F. S.
2020
Split regeneration of chelating resins for the selective recovery of nickel and copper
.
Separation and Purification Technology
253
,
117516
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).