A seasonal study of the lipid composition of a primary sludge (dry and dewatered base) obtained from an urban wastewater treatment plant located in Aguascalientes (Mexico) is reported. This study assessed the variability in sludge composition to establish its potential as a raw material for biodiesel production. Lipid recovery was achieved by extraction using two solvents. Hexane was employed for lipid extraction from dry sludge, whereas hexane and ethyl butyrate were used for comparison with dewatered sludge. The formation (%) of fatty acid methyl esters (biodiesel) was determined using extracted lipids. The extraction results from the dry sludge showed 14 and 6% of recovered lipids and their conversion to biodiesel, respectively. For the dewatered sludge, the lipid recovery and biodiesel formation were 17.4 and 60% using hexane, and 23 and 77% for ethyl butyrate, respectively, on a dry basis. Statistical data indicated that lipid recovery depended on the physicochemical characteristics of sewage sludge, which were related to seasonal changes, population activities, and changes in plant configuration, among other factors. These variables must be considered in the design of large-scale extraction equipment for the application and commercial exploitation of biomass waste in biofuel production.

  • The primary sewage sludge was valorized as biodiesel feedstock.

  • An annual sampling showed that lipid content depended on seasonal activities and weather.

  • For dewatered sludge, lipid extraction with hexane was 17.4%.

  • Lipid extraction with ethyl butyrate achieved 23%.

  • Primary sewage sludge is an alternative green feedstock for biofuel production.

The start-up and operation of urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have increased considerably in recent decades owing to population growth and urbanization. Sewage sludge (SS) is a secondary product of wastewater treatment. This residual biomass is defined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a pollutant that generates relevant environmental problems because of the high amounts produced, its high water content (80–95%), and its physicochemical characteristics (Hu & Gaob 2020; Liu et al. 2021; Xiao et al. 2022). The sludge can be treated by thermal, biological, or incineration processes for its final disposal (Liu et al. 2021; Cecconet & Capodaglio 2022; Goldan et al. 2022; Xiao et al. 2022). However, these processes require additional steps, units, and energy, which increase its management cost. For example, it has been estimated that the management of this type of waste accounts for 50% of the total operating cost of WWTPs (Ogwuelek et al. 2021; Cecconet & Capodaglio 2022). This has led to the proposal of other attractive alternatives for the management, disposal, and utilization of SS (di Bitonto et al. 2020a, 2020b; Ogwuelek et al. 2021).

With this in mind, the interest in the reuse of this waste has increased in recent years (Xiao et al. 2022). This interest is based on the fact that SS mainly contains organic matter, which can be transformed into value-added products via the application of several technologies, following the philosophy of the circular economy and the concept of biorefinery (Dufreche et al. 2007; D'Ambrosio et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2021; Goldan et al. 2022; Capodaglio 2023). Therefore, SS can be used as the feedstock for biorefineries where the organic compounds contained in this residual biomass can be transformed into fertilizers, biopolymers, biofuels, and organic acids, among other interesting value-added chemicals (Cecconet & Capodaglio 2022; Goldan et al. 2022; Mohamed & Li 2023). On the other hand, the inorganic fraction of this biomass can also be employed for the preparation of ceramic materials (Mao et al. 2023).

Primary sludge typically contains high amounts of biodegradable compounds, including carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids (di Bitonto et al. 2020a). Additionally, this sludge has a higher lipid content than secondary sludge (Mondala et al. 2009), in which free fatty acids and salts of fatty acids (soaps) are the most abundant (di Bitonto et al. 2020a, 2020b). The amount of these compounds in the SS matrix mainly depends on the unit operations used in the water treatment plants (Fytili & Zabaniotou 2008; Pastore et al. 2015; di Bitonto et al. 2020a). Fats are mainly recovered in flotation tanks or grease traps, where less dense immiscible compounds are separated from water (Pastore et al. 2015). However, soaps tend to precipitate and are present in higher amounts in settled residues (Pastore et al. 2013). Both residues contain non-polar compounds such as waxes and sterols, which cannot be converted into fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) via transesterification (di Bitonto et al. 2020b).

The use of the lipid fraction of these residues is very attractive because they can be used to produce biodiesel (i.e., FAME) (Kech et al. 2018; di Bitonto et al. 2020a). Biodiesel can be produced by catalyzed esterification/transesterification of lipids in the presence of alcohol (Dufreche et al. 2007; Mondala et al. 2009; Kech et al. 2018). However, the main limitation to its commercial production is the lipidic raw material that represents 70–85% of the production cost (Kech et al. 2018). Therefore, the use of residues such as SS from WWTP as raw materials is an economically and environmentally competitive alternative for producing biodiesel (di Bitonto et al. 2020a).

The optimization of lipid recovery using primary sludge has been analyzed in several studies (Siddiquee & Rohani 2011; Pastore et al. 2013; Olkiewicz et al. 2014; di Bitonto et al. 2016; Kech et al. 2018; D'Ambrosio et al. 2021; Villalobos-Delgado et al. 2021). Extraction studies of these lipids with dried primary sludge have been carried out using different extraction methods (Mondala et al. 2009; Willson et al. 2010; Kech et al. 2018), types of solvents (Willson et al. 2010), operating conditions (Siddiquee & Rohani 2011), and drying methods (Olkiewicz et al. 2014), among other variables. In certain cases, similarities have been reported in terms of the lipid recovery percentage (approximately 30% of lipid recovery in dry sludge (DS)) and conversion to FAME (i.e., biodiesel) of 15%. Additionally, lipid recovery from dewatered sludge using hexane as the solvent has been reported to reduce the energy required for total water removal (Pastore et al. 2013). Other studies have explored liquid–liquid extraction of raw sludge (>95% moisture) with organic solvents and ionic liquids (Olkiewicz et al. 2014, 2015a; Kech et al. 2018). In addition, biorefinery schemes using primary sludge as the raw material (Olkiewicz et al. 2016) have been proposed, and thermodynamic data on lipid extraction from emulated sludges have been calculated (Villalobos-Delgado et al. 2021), which are useful for the intensified design of extraction equipment of lipids contained in dewatered primary sludge.

The main challenge associated with biodiesel production from SS is the efficient lipid extraction (Kech et al. 2018). However, a crucial design parameter is the variability of wastewater entering the WWTP. Seasonal and daily variations generate changes in the composition of SS during their course in the WWTP. Such a composition will depend on seasonal changes, as well as urban discharges from homes, markets, and other services that are related to the activities of the population during a specific period. The degree of variability in SS composition has not been studied in detail, despite its importance and impact on the design of processes and operation of equipment used for raw material processing. Therefore, it is important to study the effects of seasonal variability on the physicochemical composition of SS to determine the feasibility of its implementation as a large-scale raw material for biodiesel production.

In this study, monthly sampling of the primary sludge from a WWTP in the city of Aguascalientes, Mexico, was carried out to determine the variation in the amount of lipids recovered and its relation to the characteristics of the sludge, collection period, and other parameters. Hexane was used as an extraction agent for the lipid extraction from dried sludge. Extraction from dewatered sludge using both a conventional solvent (hexane) and an alternative solvent with less environmental impact (ethyl butyrate) is important because the cost of treating dewatered sludge is lower than that of the drying process (28% of the drying cost) of a raw sludge (Olkiewicz et al. 2014). In summary, this study focused on generating statistical data on the characteristics of primary sludge and the recovery of lipids for their conversion to biodiesel.

Characteristics of the WWTP and sludge sampling

According to information from the inventory of the National Commission of Water (CONAGUA 2021), there are 2,872 WWTPs in Mexico, the majority of which are stabilization ponds and activated sludge. The total processing capacity of these plants is 198,603.55 L/s; however, they only process 145,341.0 L/s, which is equivalent to 67.2% of the residual water collected in the sewage systems in this country. A municipal WWTP located in the city of Aguascalientes (Mexico) was selected for this study. This plant has a capacity of 2,000 L/s and a primary SS generation of 400 m3/day. Figure 1 shows a flowchart of the WWTP selected for this study.
Figure 1

Diagram of the urban WWTP in Aguascalientes, Mexico.

Figure 1

Diagram of the urban WWTP in Aguascalientes, Mexico.

Close modal

During the year, the sludge obtained from the feed lines (see Figure 1) of the primary sludge stabilization tanks was collected monthly. The collected samples were transported to refrigerated containers and stored in a refrigerator prior to characterization. A fraction of the sludge was dewatered by filtration until a water content of 88–93% was obtained. The wet sludge (WS) or raw sludge and partially dewatered sludge (PDS) were characterized, and each analysis was performed by triplicate.

Determination of ash and total solids in sludge samples

The moisture content of each sludge (WS and PDS) was determined by placing it in an oven at 100 °C for 48 h. Subsequently, the residual mass was weighed, and the water content and total solids (TS) were determined using a mass balance. On the other hand, the ash content was determined according to the methodology of di Bitonto et al. (2016). Briefly, a sample of DS (obtained from the previous process and weighed) was introduced into a muffle furnace at 550 °C for 3 h, and a mass balance was used to calculate the ash content.

Lipid extraction from SS samples

Solid–liquid extraction (DS)

Solid–liquid extractions were carried out using the DS. The sludge was ground and sieved until a particle size of 210 μm was obtained to achieve a higher contact area between the solid and the solvent. Then, 2 g of the DS was placed in a 15 mL vessel with 5 mL of hexane, and the mixture was vigorously shaken for 5 min. The system was allowed to settle to obtain a liquid phase (mixture of non-polar compounds) and a solid phase. The liquid phase was recovered by settling and deposition in a weighed container. Finally, the vessel containing the total liquid phase was placed in an oven at 50 °C to evaporate the solvent until a constant weight of the extract was obtained, and the extraction (percentage) of the organic fraction was determined. The lipid content was analyzed via an esterification/transesterification reaction to determine the fatty acid profile and conversion to biodiesel. Specifically, 50 mg of the lipid sample was reacted with 2 mL of a methanol solution with methyl heptadecanoate as an internal standard (2 g of standard/1 L of methanol) in the presence of a homogeneous acid catalyst (hydrochloric acid) at 100 °C for 4 h in a closed batch reactor. The non-reacted methanol was evaporated at the end of the reaction, and the upper phase of the mixture was analyzed in a gas chromatograph Thermo Scientific Trace 1300 GC equipped with a flame ionized detector (FID) and column TG-5SILMS with dimensions of 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm. The instrument was programmed with an injection temperature of 250 °C in splitless mode, a detector temperature of 300 °C, and a helium flow of 2.5 mL/min. The oven temperature was set at 40 °C for 2.5 min, with a heating ramp of 10 °C/min to achieve 280 °C, which was maintained for 10 min.

Methyl heptadecanoate was used as the basis for calculating the percentage of FAME formation according to the EN-14103 standard, using the following equation:
(1)
where ΣA is the total area of FAME and internal standard, mb is the sample mass (g), Vs is the standard volume (mL), Cs is the concentration of the standard (mg/mL), and As is the area of the standard.

Liquid–liquid extraction (dewatered SS)

Ethyl butyrate and hexane were used as solvents for the extraction of the PDS. Specifically, 55 g of sludge was mixed with 50 mL of extractant (hexane or ethyl butyrate). The mixture was stirred at 400 rpm for 1 h to obtain a biphasic semi-solid suspension at the interface. The semi-solid phase was separated from the liquid phase. The light semi-solid phase mixture was recovered and centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 2 min to separate the calcium soaps (semi-solid phase) from the liquid phase (non-polar compounds). The extraction procedure was repeated for the same sludge sample until 150 mL of solvent was added. The solvent was separated from the liquid phase by distillation. The solid was dried at 50 °C for 48 h to remove residual solvent. The weights of the non-polar compounds and solids are reported. The esterification/transesterification of the extracted lipids was performed according to the methodology described in Section 2.3.1.

Characterization of SS and lipids recovered by extraction

A set of representative samples of sludge ash and lipids recovered by extraction (calcium soaps and non-polar compounds) were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy. An infrared spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS10) with an ATR configuration in the wavenumber range of 650–4,000 cm−1, an X-ray diffractometer (Empyrean Panalytical using the Bragg-Brentano configuration with CuK-1 radiation), and an XRF spectrometer (Epsilon 4 with metallic ceramic X-ray tube, 50 μm Be window, and energy dispersive) were used.

Sludge sampling and characterization

The moisture content of all samples collected from the raw primary SS was higher than 95%. Figure 2(a) shows the percentage of TS for each sample. The percentage of TS ranged between 2.6 and 4.36%. During the hottest and rainiest months in the sampling area, a higher percentage of solids was found in the samples, which was the result of an increase in the dragging of pollutants into the sewer (Olkiewicz et al. 2014). The value of TS reported in the literature reveals differences in the types of waste generated in treatment plants (primary, secondary, mixed sludge, and slag or grease). Di Bitonto et al. (2020a) indicated that the TS content in the primary sludge was 4.2–4.4% in three different plants in southern Italy. Olkiewicz et al. (2012) reported similar amounts with mean values of 4.2 ± 1.2% in Spain, while Kech et al. (2018) reported 1.03 and 2.19–6.63% TS in the raw and dewatered sludge, respectively, obtained from a WWTP in Belgium.
Figure 2

(a) TS contained in the raw sludge from the WWTP and (b) ash content in TS.

Figure 2

(a) TS contained in the raw sludge from the WWTP and (b) ash content in TS.

Close modal

Figure 2(b) shows the amount of ash in the solids, which varied between 22.68 and 51.5%. These values are consistent with those reported in the literature (Fytili & Zabaniotou 2008; Payá et al. 2019). The increase in the amount of ash and the consequent decrease in the organic matter identified in some samples were due to a change in the configuration of the treatment plant with the incorporation of an anaerobic reactor and the elimination of the aerobic digestor. Such new reactor received the primary and secondary sludges to generate biogas from the organic matter (Matheri et al. 2020). This new reactor offered a more efficient process that reduced the organic fraction contained in the aqueous residues recirculated to the plant input. This configuration change implied an increment of the inorganic matter content and, consequently, the ashes in the solids of the primary sludge also increased.

These data are interesting in terms of the design of biorefinery plants using SS as the feedstock. It is crucial to keep in mind that the composition of the sludge may vary due to various factors; the more information on municipal waste becomes available, the more the biorefineries will become a reality in the near future.

It is convenient to indicate that the variation in the composition of the primary sludge could be due to both the modification of the primary process and the entry of wastewater, as well as the transportation and formation of new compounds through the municipal sewage system.

This could be mainly due to the presence of microorganisms that degrade long-chain organic compounds as well as the oxidation of sulfides (VandeWalle et al. 2012; Nielsen & Vollertsen 2021). These observations confirm that the composition of primary sludge is a function of multiple dynamic variables that affect its physicochemical characteristics (Yu et al. 2021).

Table 1 shows the characterization of the primary sludge ash by XRF, where the elements of the inorganic fraction of the sludge are indicated. Si is the most abundant element, followed by Ca (Coutand et al. 2007; Payá et al. 2019). Traces of metals, such as Cu, Ni, Cr, and Al, have also been observed (Payá et al. 2019). The X-ray diffractograms in Figure 3(a) show mineral compounds such as quartz (SiO2, ICDD:01-086-2237), calcite (CaCO3, ICDD:00-047-1743), and calcium aluminosilicate (Al1.77Ca0.88O8Si2.23, ICDD:00-052-1344) (Coutand et al. 2007; Baeza-Brotons et al. 2014; Payá et al. 2019). Diffraction peaks that identify the elements in quartz were found at 20.87°, 26.63°, 36.55°, 39.44°, and 50.129° 2θ; in the case of calcite, they corresponded to 23.66°, 29.96°, 36.01°, 39.44°, and 48.5° 2θ and for calcium aluminosilicate are 21.95°, 27.42°, 27.76°, and 28.03° 2θ, respectively. In general, these minerals are present in the soil and are easily transported through wastewater sewage systems to treatment plants. They are removed in primary processes where the residues obtained are disposed of as fertilizers or taken to sanitary landfills (Fytili & Zabaniotou 2008; Ohbuchi et al. 2008; Baeza-Brotons et al. 2014).
Table 1

XRF results to determine the elemental composition of the ash contained in the residual sludge samples from the WWTP

ElementSiCaAlFePKSTiMgZnCl
49.65 17.27 9.78 7.72 5.34 3.87 3.30 1.26 0.92 0.61 0.28 
ElementSiCaAlFePKSTiMgZnCl
49.65 17.27 9.78 7.72 5.34 3.87 3.30 1.26 0.92 0.61 0.28 
Figure 3

(a) X-ray diffractograms of dry primary sludge samples and ashes contained in TS and (b) FTIR spectrum of the dry primary sludge.

Figure 3

(a) X-ray diffractograms of dry primary sludge samples and ashes contained in TS and (b) FTIR spectrum of the dry primary sludge.

Close modal

Figure 3(b) shows the infrared spectrum of the DS. An absorption band was observed at 3,300 cm−1, corresponding to the OH group of the alcohols and humidity. Characteristic absorption bands of the CH aliphatic groups were found at the region 2,900–2,840 cm−1, 1,410 cm−1, and 800–700 cm−1 (Bahadi et al. 2016; Ahsaine et al. 2017). The absorption bands of the C = O and C–O groups of glyceride-type esters or alkyl esters are located at 1,730 cm−1 and 1,300–1,000 cm−1 (Pastore et al. 2013; Bahadi et al. 2016; Han et al. 2020). The absorption bands at 1,468 and 1,631 cm−1 are associated with the C = C and C = O groups, respectively (Ahsaine et al. 2017; Han et al. 2020). Calcium soaps correspond to COO aliphatic groups (Pastore et al. 2013; Hao et al. 2017).

Solid–liquid extraction of lipids from DS using hexane

Figure 4 shows the percentage of lipid recovery and FAME formation obtained from the DS using hexane as the extraction agent. These percentages are in the range of 5.1–44.5% and 1.9–17.5% by weight of the DS, respectively. It is worth mentioning that a FAME conversion of 38.85–72.13% per gram of lipid can be obtained (see Table 2).
Table 2

Percentage conversion of FAME per unit lipid weight

Sampling monthFAME, % (per gram of lipids)
70.55 
68.91 
53.60 
38.85 
73.07 
72.16 
50.08 
52.69 
52.62 
10 43.11 
11 53.60 
12 41.78 
Sampling monthFAME, % (per gram of lipids)
70.55 
68.91 
53.60 
38.85 
73.07 
72.16 
50.08 
52.69 
52.62 
10 43.11 
11 53.60 
12 41.78 
Figure 4

Recovery of lipids and formation of FAME from the DS using hexane as the extraction agent.

Figure 4

Recovery of lipids and formation of FAME from the DS using hexane as the extraction agent.

Close modal

The FAME performance results are consistent with data reported in other studies, which show a biodiesel recovery between 4.78 and 18.9% by weight of the DS (Mondala et al. 2009; Willson et al. 2010; Siddiquee & Rohani 2011; Olkiewicz et al. 2014). However, in this study, it was observed that for some months, the variation between samples was considerable both in lipid recovery and FAME conversion.

It is important to highlight that the extraction method and type of extraction agent influence the amount of lipids recovered. For example, the addition of a mineral acid and methanol to sludge before the separation process favors the recovery of lipids or FAME, resulting in 14.5% (Mondala et al. 2009) and 10% of FAME (Pastore et al. 2013) from sludge dry basis. Willson et al. (2010) and Olkiewicz et al. (2014) used extraction via Soxhlet, obtaining a maximum lipid recovery of 23.1 and 26.3% with FAME formation of 51.04 and 71.8%, respectively. The use of ionic liquids as extraction agents has been reported where 18.5–23.4% of lipids have been recovered, with 74% saponifiable lipids (Olkiewicz et al. 2015a). Siddiquee & Rohani (2011) performed a detailed lipid recovery analysis by separating the solids from the organic phase via filtration using hexane as the solvent. The results showed a lipid recovery of 11.2% on a dry basis and a FAME conversion yield of 41.3% with respect to the extracted lipids.

Suspended solids (calcium soaps) and low-density non-saponifiable solids were present in the samples with the highest percentage of lipid recovery. Therefore, the FAME yield was higher in this sampling and similar to the results reported by Olkiewicz et al. (2014) with 18.9% FAME with respect to the DS, as a higher amount of lipids (soluble lipids and calcium soaps) reacted with methanol in the presence of the acid catalyst. Previous studies have shown that 71–82% of the lipids contained in primary sludge are soaps, mainly calcium, although potassium, magnesium, and sodium are also present (Willson et al. 2010; Pastore et al. 2013). The presence of these organic salts is due to the use of domestic products and metabolic wastes transported by the sewage system (Pastore et al. 2013, 2015). These soaps are insoluble in water and are recovered during sedimentation in water treatment plants. In contact with solutions containing H+ ion donors (HCl and H2SO4), soaps react to form salts and free fatty acids (Pastore et al. 2013, 2015). Free fatty acids are soluble in non-polar compounds, such as hexane, whereas fatty acid salts are scarcely soluble. The presence of suspended solids (calcium soaps) in the liquid phase and their subsequent conversion to FAME explain the differences observed in some samples. This is the case for the sample of month 4, which showed a higher lipid recovery than the rest of the samples during the year. This may be due to the presence of non-saponifiable lipids, especially calcium soaps, which play an important role in the beneficial liquid–solid equilibrium in lipid recovery. However, this behavior was not observed with other samples and this result can be considered as an outlier caused by process operation.

Therefore, for the design and intensification of the recovery processes of interesting compounds, it is essential to consider the variations in this type of raw material with respect to their composition (Siddiquee & Rohani 2011). The results of this study indicate that the composition of the residues circulating in the sewage system is not constant, and there may be variations in the amount of lipids extracted from SS. This result is very interesting because the primary sludge may have a different composition between regions and countries depending on waste disposal and government regulation of water discharge, among other factors. In this study, it was determined that each of the collected samples presented different characteristics in terms of color, percentage of solids, and content of fibrous compounds.

Liquid–liquid extraction in the dewatered sludge

According to the literature and data obtained in this study, the amount of moisture present in the total mass of raw primary sludge is higher than 95% (Olkiewicz et al. 2014; Bora et al. 2020). This parameter implies that the largest mass and volume of sludge is mainly water. The recovery of compounds of interest, such as lipids, from dried sludge is the most recommended process. However, the cost of drying alone, represents 50% of the total cost of biodiesel production from SS (Villalobos-Delgado et al. 2021). For this reason, some authors have conducted studies on the raw sludge without a moisture removal process and using hexane or other compounds (i.e., ionic liquids) in the extraction process (Olkiewicz et al. 2014, 2015a). Furthermore, dewatered sludge has been reported as an option for lipid recovery (Pastore et al. 2013). This dewatered process has a lower cost than the drying process.

Lipid extraction from the dewatered sludge was evaluated using hexane and ethyl butyrate as solvents. One of the main differences in the use of both solvents is the formation of an emulsion with sludge under the experimental conditions (Pastore et al. 2013; D'Ambrosio et al. 2021). Another difference observed in the samples was the color of the phases. Specifically, the color of the light phase was observed to be among yellow, green, and sometimes dark when hexane was used. In contact with ethyl butyrate, this phase presented a dark brown coloration with a reduction in solids in the semi-solid fraction. The semi-solid phase had a grayish color, as mentioned in the literature (Pastore et al. 2013, 2015).

Figure 5 shows the recovery of lipids and FAME in the dewatered sludge using hexane (Figure 5(a)) and ethyl butyrate (Figure 5(b)) as solvents for extraction. In the case of hexane, a higher recovery of lipids was observed compared to studies on lipid extraction from DS. The lipid recovery percentage of ethyl butyrate was higher than that of hexane with the dewatered sludge. The lipids extracted from such sludge were 7.9–27.8% for hexane and 10.1–36.1% for ethyl butyrate on a dry basis, while the percentage of FAME was 3.2–21.0% and 7.1–26.2% for hexane and ethyl butyrate, respectively, on a dry basis. On the other hand, the percentages of solid lipids (organic salts) and extracted non-polar lipids (dissolved in the solvent) are shown in Figure 6. Similar results for the behavior of both solvents were reported by D'Ambrosio et al. (2021). Notably, in some samples, the amount of lipids extracted was up to 50% lower than that obtained for most of the collected samples. This result was mainly attributed to changes in the configuration of the plant for the use of residual sludge in anaerobic processes.
Figure 5

Extraction of lipids and formation of FAME from the dewatered sludge using the following extraction agents: (a) hexane and (b) ethyl butyrate.

Figure 5

Extraction of lipids and formation of FAME from the dewatered sludge using the following extraction agents: (a) hexane and (b) ethyl butyrate.

Close modal
Figure 6

Soluble lipids and solid lipids extracted from the dewatered sludge using (a) hexane and (b) ethyl butyrate.

Figure 6

Soluble lipids and solid lipids extracted from the dewatered sludge using (a) hexane and (b) ethyl butyrate.

Close modal

In this context, calcium salts are poorly soluble in aqueous solutions and non-polar compounds such as hexane (Pastore et al. 2013). However, when a non-polar solvent (hexane) interacts with dewatered SS, the solvent wets calcium soaps and binds because calcium salts have one or two non-hydrophilic organic chains, causing the flotation of soap particles, which allows the wetted soaps to move to the interface (Pastore et al. 2013). Olkiewicz et al. (2015a) concluded that in minimal amounts of moisture, the viscosity is high, and agitation focused on highly viscous fluids is required to facilitate the extraction agent to wet all the small particles (Lotito et al. 1997; Pastore et al. 2013). Therefore, an adequate amount of water (88–94% humidity) allows all the solids to be distributed homogeneously in a certain volume and, in this way, facilitates solid–liquid–liquid separation. The opposite case was solid–liquid extraction, where hexane was in direct contact with the soaps. However, most organic salts remained in the solid phase. Thus, in the process, only the soaps that were soluble in the extraction agents and/or suspended in them were recovered.

The results reported in Figure 6 indicate that solid lipids were found in a higher proportion when hexane was used, while a higher amount of soluble lipids was observed when ethyl butyrate was used. It can be inferred that solid lipids react in the presence of ethyl butyrate to form free fatty acids (soluble lipids), favoring a higher FAME formation (D'Ambrosio et al. 2021). Lipid extraction using ethyl butyrate was higher when the dewatered sludge was used (Figures 5(b) and 6(b)). D'Ambrosio et al. (2021) demonstrated that lipid extraction using ethyl butyrate is higher than that achieved with other organic solvents such as hexane. The recovery of soluble lipids was higher than that obtained for insoluble lipids (calcium soaps) (Figure 6(a)), indicating that the reaction of such soaps to form free fatty acids (soluble) was due to the presence of ethyl butyrate.

Characterization of lipids

Table 3 shows the profiles of the fatty acids contained in the lipids extracted with hexane, with palmitic acid being the compound present in the highest amount (42–58%), followed by stearic acid (18.3–24.5%), and oleic and linoleic acids (9.5–22.3%). These fatty acids originate mainly from fecal waste and kitchen residues. This profile is similar to those reported in the literature (Mondala et al. 2009; Siddiquee & Rohani 2011; Olkiewicz et al. 2014, 2015b).

Table 3

Fatty acid profile of lipids contained in the primary sludge recovered using hexane

Sampling month
Fatty acids123456789101112
C16 42.70 45.32 49.30 51.93 47.44 50.52 50.88 49.64 50.12 58.11 48.45 52.45 
C16:1 1.08 1.40 0.64 0.97 1.09 0.77 2.45 1.18 1.12 0.0 3.12 0.59 
C14 5.40 5.85 5.56 6.61 5.37 5.64 6.54 4.72 4.39 5.96 5.82 6.56 
C12 1.05 0.80 1.24 1.22 0.98 1.11 0.98 0.83 0.55 0.81 1.41 1.28 
C18:1 + 2 20.46 22.83 17.18 12.32 15.62 13.64 15.65 12.56 15.41 9.46 16.56 14.05 
C18:0 20.33 18.36 20.70 23.17 22.92 23.82 18.33 24.49 23.35 21.1 21.01 20.72 
C20 1.06 0.90 1.44 1.33 1.31 1.32 1.34 1.92 1.48 1.64 1.36 1.20 
C22 0.32 0.48 0.39 0.32 0.70 0.43 0.42 0.78 0.6 0.42 0.45 0.40 
Sampling month
Fatty acids123456789101112
C16 42.70 45.32 49.30 51.93 47.44 50.52 50.88 49.64 50.12 58.11 48.45 52.45 
C16:1 1.08 1.40 0.64 0.97 1.09 0.77 2.45 1.18 1.12 0.0 3.12 0.59 
C14 5.40 5.85 5.56 6.61 5.37 5.64 6.54 4.72 4.39 5.96 5.82 6.56 
C12 1.05 0.80 1.24 1.22 0.98 1.11 0.98 0.83 0.55 0.81 1.41 1.28 
C18:1 + 2 20.46 22.83 17.18 12.32 15.62 13.64 15.65 12.56 15.41 9.46 16.56 14.05 
C18:0 20.33 18.36 20.70 23.17 22.92 23.82 18.33 24.49 23.35 21.1 21.01 20.72 
C20 1.06 0.90 1.44 1.33 1.31 1.32 1.34 1.92 1.48 1.64 1.36 1.20 
C22 0.32 0.48 0.39 0.32 0.70 0.43 0.42 0.78 0.6 0.42 0.45 0.40 

Figure 7 presents the FTIR spectra of the lipids extracted with hexane and ethyl butyrate from the dry and dewatered sludges.
Figure 7

FTIR spectra of lipids from the primary sludge. (a) Extraction from the DS using hexane, (b) extraction from the dewatered sludge using hexane, and (c) extraction from the dewatered sludge using ethyl butyrate.

Figure 7

FTIR spectra of lipids from the primary sludge. (a) Extraction from the DS using hexane, (b) extraction from the dewatered sludge using hexane, and (c) extraction from the dewatered sludge using ethyl butyrate.

Close modal

It is interesting to observe variations in the intensities of the characteristic absorption bands of the extracted lipids. In the first instance, the absorption bands of aliphatic CH groups were identified at 2,900–2,840 cm−1, 1,410 cm−1, and 700 cm−1 (Bahadi et al. 2016). The absorption bands located at 1,300–1,000 cm−1 and 1,735 cm−1 are associated with the C–O and C = O groups of glyceride esters or alkyl esters (Pastore et al. 2013; Bahadi et al. 2016). In addition, an absorption band was observed at 1,710 cm−1 (more evident in soluble lipids), related to the C = O group of carboxylic acids in the free fatty acid fraction (Pastore et al. 2013; Bahadi et al. 2016). Calcium soaps are COO– carboxylic salts with absorption bands in the region of 1,580–1,530 cm−1, and their presence is more noticeable in the spectra of solid lipids extracted with hexane (Pastore et al. 2013; Hao et al. 2017). In the spectra of the lipids recovered with ethyl butyrate, a decrease in the absorption bands associated with calcium soaps and an increase in the absorption band associated with free fatty acids were observed, thus confirming the reaction of the calcium soaps to form free fatty acids during the mixing of the solvent and primary sludge (D'Ambrosio et al. 2021).

The composition of the residual sludge generated in an urban WWTP in the City of Aguascalientes, Mexico was investigated to determine the degree of variation in its composition. The results of the study indicated that the lipid content that can be extracted from the residual sludge can vary significantly due to seasonal factors, changes in the configuration of the treatment plant itself, municipal waste management at the local level, and government regulation regarding water discharges, among other factors. These lipids are an inexpensive source of raw material for biodiesel production; however, as demonstrated, it is important to determine the variation of the composition of this raw material during the year to suitably design and intensify the processes and operations involved for the recovery and exploitation of such feedstock. The valorization of this type of waste must consider possible changes in its composition to scale the use of this raw material to an industrial level and take advantage of its potential to produce value-added compounds.

The authors are grateful for funding from the European Union and the Organization of Ibero-American States (OEI) for the development of the project ‘Development of sustainable processes to obtain biofuels and fine chemicals using biomass from wastewater treatment plants in Latin America and Europe’ of the Ibero-American Network for the Valuation and Sustainable Use of Biomass – IBERBIOMASA. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union and OEI. The opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the European Union and the OEI.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahsaine
H. A.
,
Zbair
M.
&
El-Haouti
R.
2017
Mesoporous treated sewage sludge as outstanding low-cost adsorbent for cadmium removal
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
85
,
330
338
.
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21310
.
Baeza-Brotons
F.
,
Garcés
P.
,
Payá
J.
&
Saval
J. M.
2014
Portland cement systems with addition of sewage sludge ash. application in concretes for the manufacture of blocks
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
82
,
112
124
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.072
.
Bahadi
M. A.
,
Japir
A. W.
,
Salih
N.
&
Salimon
J.
2016
Free fatty acids separation from Malaysian high free fatty acid crude palm oil using molecular distillation
.
Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences
20
(
5
),
1042
1051
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/mjas-2016-2005-08
.
Bora
A. P.
,
Gupta
D. P.
&
Durbha
K. S.
2020
Sewage sludge to bio-fuel: a review on the sustainable approach of transforming sewage waste to alternative fuel
.
Fuel
259
,
116262
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116262
.
Cecconet
D.
&
Capodaglio
A. G.
2022
Sewage sludge biorefinery for circular economy
.
Sustainability
14
(
22
),
14841
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214841
.
Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA): Inventario de Plantas Municipales de Potabilización y de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales en Operación. 2021 https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/759492/Inventario_2021.pdf (accessed Dicember 2022)
.
Coutand
M.
,
Cyr
M.
&
Clastres
P.
2007
Use of sewage sludge ash as mineral admixture in mortars
.
Construction Materials
159
(
4
),
153
162
.
https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.2006.159.4.153
.
D'Ambrosio
V.
,
di Bitonto
L.
,
Angelini
A.
,
Gallipoli
A.
,
Braguglia
C. M.
&
Pastore
C.
2021
Lipid extraction from sewage sludge using green biosolvent for sustainable biodiesel production
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
329
,
129643
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129643
.
di Bitonto
L.
,
Lopez
A.
,
Mascolo
G.
,
Mininni
G.
&
Pastore
C.
2016
Efficient solvent-less separation of lipids from municipal wet sewage scum and their sustainable conversion into biodiesel
.
Renewable Energy
90
,
55
61
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.049
.
di Bitonto
L.
,
Locaputo
V.
,
D'Ambrosio
V.
&
Pastore
C.
2020a
Direct Lewis-Bronsted acid ethanolysis of sewage sludge for production of liquid fuels
.
Applied Energy
259
,
114163
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114163
.
di Bitonto
L.
,
Todisco
S.
,
Gallo
V.
&
Pastore
C.
2020b
Urban sewage scum and primary sludge as profitable sources of biodiesel and biolubricants of new generation
.
Bioresource Technology Reports
9
,
100382
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100382
.
Dufreche
S.
,
Hernandez
R.
,
French
T.
,
Sparks
D.
,
Zappi
M.
&
Alley
E.
2007
Extraction of lipids from municipal wastewater plant microorganisms for production of biodiesel
.
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society
84
,
181
187
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-006-1022-4
.
Fytili
D.
&
Zabaniotou
A.
2008
Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods – a review
.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
12
(
1
),
116
140
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.014
.
Goldan
E.
,
Nedeff
V.
,
Barsan
N.
,
Culea
M.
,
Tomozei
C.
,
Panainte-Lehadus
M.
&
Mosnegutu
E.
2022
Evaluation of the use of sewage sludge biochar as a soil amendment – a review
.
Sustainability
14
(
9
),
5309
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095309
.
Han
M.
,
Zhang
K.
,
Chu
W.
,
Zhou
G.
&
Chen
J.
2020
Surface-modified sewage sludge-derived carbonaceous catalyst as a persulfate activator for phenol degradation
.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
17
(
9
),
3286
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093286
.
Hu
Y.
&
Gaob
Z.
2020
Sewage sludge in microwave oven: a sustainable synthetic approach toward carbon dots for fluorescent sensing of para-Nitrophenol
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
382
,
121048
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121048
.
Kech
C.
,
Galloy
A.
,
Frippiat
C.
,
Piel
A.
&
Garotc
D.
2018
Optimization of direct liquid-liquid extraction of lipids from wet urban sewage sludge for biodiesel production
.
Fuel
212
,
132
139
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.010
.
Liu
X.
,
Zhu
F.
,
Zhang
R.
,
Zhao
L.
&
Qi
J.
2021
Recent progress on biodiesel production from municipal sewage sludge
.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
135
,
110260
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110260
.
Lotito
V.
,
Spinosa
L.
,
Mininni
G.
&
Antonacci
R.
1997
The rheology of sewage sludge at different steps of treatment
.
Water Science and Technology
36
(
11
),
79
85
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00672-0
.
Mao
H.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Cui
K.
,
Yu
L.
&
Tan
T.
2023
Recycling sewage sludge into ceramic materials: a review
.
Environmental Chemistry Letters
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01550-6
.
Matheri
A. N.
,
Eloko
N. S.
,
Ntuli
F.
&
Ngila
J. C.
2020
Influence of pyrolyzed sludge use as an adsorbent in removal of selected trace metals from wastewater treatment
.
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
2
,
100018
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100018
.
Mohamed
B. A.
&
Li
L. Y.
2023
Biofuel production by co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and other materials: a review
.
Environmental Chemistry Letters
21
,
153
182
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01496-9
.
Mondala
A.
,
Liang
K.
,
Toghiani
H.
,
Hernandez
R.
&
French
T.
2009
Biodiesel production by in situ transesterification of municipal primary and secondary sludges
.
Bioresource Technology
100
(
3
),
1203
1210
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.020
.
Nielsen
A. H.
&
Vollertsen
J.
2021
Model parameters for aerobic biological sulfide oxidation in sewer wastewater
.
Water
13
(
7
),
981
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070981
.
Ogwuelek
T. C.
,
Ofeoshi
C. I.
&
Ubah
J. I.
2021
Application of bio-drying technique for effective moisture reduction and disposal of sewage sludge in the framework of water-energy nexus
.
Energy Nexus
4
,
100028
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2021.100028
.
Ohbuchi
A.
,
Sakamoto
J.
,
Kitano
M.
&
Nakamura
T.
2008
X-ray fluorescence analysis of sludge ash from sewage disposal plant
.
X-Ray Spectrometry
37
(
5
),
544
550
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1085
.
Olkiewicz
M.
,
Fortuny
A.
,
Stüber
F.
,
Fabregat
A.
,
Font
J.
&
Bengoa
C.
2012
Evaluation of different sludges from WWTP as a potential source for biodiesel production
.
Procedia Engineering
42
,
634
643
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.456
.
Olkiewicz
M.
,
Caporgno
M. P.
,
Fortuny
A.
,
Stüber
F.
,
Fabregat
A.
,
Font
J.
&
Bengoa
C.
2014
Direct liquid – liquid extraction of lipid from municipal sewage sludge for biodiesel production
.
Fuel Processing Technology
128
,
331
338
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.041
.
Olkiewicz
M.
,
Plechkova
N. V.
,
Fabregat
A.
,
Stüber
F.
,
Fortuny
A.
,
Font
J.
&
Bengoa
C.
2015a
Efficient extraction of lipids from primary sewage sludge using ionic liquids for biodiesel production
.
Separation and Purification Technology
153
,
118
125
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.08.038
.
Olkiewicz
M.
,
Fortuny
A.
,
Stüber
F.
,
Fabregat
A.
,
Fonta
J.
&
Bengoa
C.
2015b
Effects of pre-treatments on the lipid extraction and biodiesel production from municipal WWTP sludge
.
Fuel
141
,
250
257
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.066
.
Olkiewicz
M.
,
Torres
C. M.
,
Jiménez
L.
,
Font
J.
&
Bengoa
C.
2016
Scale-up and economic analysis of biodiesel production from municipal primary sewage sludge
.
Bioresource Technology
214
,
122
131
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.098
.
Pastore
C.
,
Lopez
A.
,
Lotito
V.
&
Mascolo
G.
2013
Biodiesel from dehydrated wastewater sludge: a two step process for a more advantageous production
.
Chemosphere
92
(
6
),
667
673
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.046
.
Pastore
C.
,
Pagano
M.
,
Lopez
A.
,
Mininni
G.
&
Mascolo
G.
2015
Fat, oil and grease waste from municipal wastewater: characterization, activation and sustainable conversion into biofuel
.
Water Science and Technology
71
(
8
),
1151
1157
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.084
.
Payá
J.
,
Monzó
J.
,
Borrachero
M. V.
&
Soriano
L.
2019
5 – sewage sludge ash
. In:
New Trends in Eco-Efficient and Recycled Concrete
. pp.
121
152
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102480-5.00005-1
.
Siddiquee
M. N.
&
Rohani
S.
2011
Experimental analysis of lipid extraction and biodiesel production from wastewater sludge
.
Fuel Processing Technology
92
(
12
),
2241
2251
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.07.018
.
VandeWalle
J. L.
,
Goetz
G. W.
,
Huse
S. M.
,
Morrison
H. G.
,
Sogin
M. L.
,
Hoffmann
R. G.
,
Yan
K.
&
McLellan
S. L.
2012
Acinetobacter, Aeromonas and Trichococcus populations dominate the microbial community within urban sewer infrastructure
.
Environmental Microbiology
14
(
9
),
2538
2552
.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02757.x
.
Villalobos-Delgado
F. J.
,
di Bitonto
L.
,
Reynel-Avila
H. E.
,
Mendoza-Castillo
D. I.
,
Bonilla-Petriciolet
A.
&
Pastore
C.
2021
Efficient and sustainable recovery of lipids from sewage sludge using ethyl esters of volatile fatty acids as sustainable extracting solvent
.
Fuel
295
,
120630
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120630
.
Willson
R. M.
,
Wiesman
Z.
&
Brenner
A.
2010
Analyzing alternative bio-waste feedstocks for potential biodiesel production using time domain (TD)-NMR
.
Waste Management
30
(
10
),
1881
1888
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.008
.
Xiao
Y.
,
Raheema
A.
,
Ding
L.
,
Chen
W. H.
,
Chen
X.
,
Wang
F.
&
Ling
S. L.
2022
Pretreatment, modification and applications of sewage sludge-derived biochar for resource recovery - A review
.
Chemosphere
287
(
1
),
131969
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131969
.
Yu
B.
,
Luo
J.
,
Xie
H.
,
Yang
H.
,
Chen
S.
,
Liu
J.
,
Zhang
R.
&
Li
Y.
2021
Species, fractions, and characterization of phosphorus in sewage sludge: a critical review from the perspective of recovery
.
Science of the Total Environment
786
,
147437
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147437
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).