With the gradual control of point source pollution, the impact of urban nonpoint source pollution on river water quality is becoming more prominent. Regarding the current problem that nonpoint source pollution loads in urban basins are difficult to quantify and the impact on water quality is difficult to analyze, the Licun River basin in Qingdao was selected as the research object. Through the field survey and surface accumulation sampling analysis of the basin, the evaluation model of urban nonpoint source pollution was constructed by revising the land type data of the basin and the urban database of the SWAT model. The results showed that concentration of nitrate in precipitation was most sensitive to the simulation of nitrogen loading; organic P in baseflow was most sensitive to the simulation of phosphorus loading. The Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (ENS) and the coefficients of determination (R2) of the SWAT model for runoff, total phosphorus (TP), and total nitrogen (TN) in the simulation validation period meet the model requirements,indicating a good model fit. In addition, the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of urban nonpoint source pollution of TN and TP in 2021 were analyzed. In July, rainfall-runoff from the Licun River basin was the most polluted.

  • High-accuracy simulation of urban nonpoint source pollution in small-scale basins.

  • Revising the land type data of the basin and modifying the model's town database.

  • Realize quantification and impact analysis of urban nonpoint source pollution load.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

In urban areas of China, the large percentage of impervious areas, the complexity of production activities, and the variety of pollution sources have led to serious pollution of urban rivers. Urban nonpoint source pollution is the second-largest source of nonpoint source pollution after agricultural nonpoint source pollution (Zhang et al. 2011; Cheng et al. 2017). In recent years, with the improvement of sewage collection, interception systems, and effluent standards of the sewage treatment plants in urban areas of China, point source pollution has been gradually controlled. On the other hand, the impact of urban nonpoint source pollution on river water quality is becoming more prominent. Therefore, it is urgent to study the load quantification and impact of urban river nonpoint source pollution, thus providing data support for improving urban river water quality.

At present, the load quantification of urban surface pollution is mostly estimated using empirical formulas, and there is a lack of a more accurate load quantification method. With the massive development of distributed hydrological models (e.g., SWAT, HSPF, AnnAGNPS models) (Radcliffe & Cabrera 2006; He et al. 2020; Marin et al. 2020), the high-accuracy simulation of agricultural nonpoint source pollution loads in large-scale basins has been achieved. However, there is a lack of research on applying models for load quantification and impact analysis of urban nonpoint source pollution in small-scale basins of urban rivers.

The Licun River basin in Qingdao is a typical urban river catchment area. At present, the nitrogen and phosphorus in the effluent of the wastewater treatment plant in the basin of the Licun River have reached the IV standard for surface water, and the sewage interception system in this region has become more comprehensive. Consequently, urban nonpoint source pollution has become the primary type of pollution affecting the water quality of the Licun River. Therefore, the Licun River basin in Qingdao was selected as the study object, and the SWAT model was used for simulation analysis. Through the field survey and surface accumulation sampling, the acquired land use data and the urban database of the model were revised, achieving the urban nonpoint source pollution load quantification and impact analysis of the Licun River basin. This study can provide a reference for analyzing urban nonpoint source pollution of similar urban rivers in China.

The Licun River basin is located in Qingdao, Shandong Province, China, with a basin area of 137 km2. It is in the north temperate monsoon climate region, influenced by the southeast monsoon of the ocean, and has significant maritime climate characteristics. The average annual temperature of the basin is 12.7 °C, the average annual rainfall is 662.1 mm, and the rainfall is unevenly distributed throughout the year, with spring, summer, autumn, and winter precipitation accounting for 17, 57, 21, and 5%, respectively. In addition to the mainstream of the Licun River, the basin also contains the Zhangcun River, the Dacun River, the Shuiqinggou River, and the Jinshui River. Among them, the mainstream of the Licun River has a recycled water purification plant for the Expo, a wastewater treatment plant for the Licun River, the Wuyang Road water replenishment site, and the triangle water replenishment site. Tributary Zhangcun River has a water quality purification plant along the river and a water replenishment site for No.2 Tsingtao Brewery, which is the primary point source input and replenishment source for the Licun River basin. The geographical location of the Licun River basin and the distribution of the water system are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Distribution of water systems in the Licun River basin.

Figure 1

Distribution of water systems in the Licun River basin.

Close modal

Research method

The SWAT model is commonly used for the analysis of nonpoint source pollution. It includes modules for rainfall simulation, sink production, and diffusion of river water quality (Ding & Zheng 2004; Radcliffe & Cabrera 2006). Because of its pesticide/insecticide module and the agricultural management module, the SWAT model is often used to simulate agricultural nonpoint source pollution in basins and is rarely used for urban nonpoint source pollution studies. According to the ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT2009: User's Guide (Winchell 2012) and the SWAT Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009 (Arnold et al. 2011), it was found that the SWAT model for versions 2009 and above already has an urban database. The basin land use data and urban database have been improved, enabling the simulation of urban nonpoint source pollution in the basin with the SWAT model. The key parameters of the SWAT model urban database (Arnold et al. 2011; Abdelwahab et al. 2018) are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Parameters of SWAT model urban database

ParametersMeanings
FIMP Fraction of total impervious area in urban land 
FCIMP The proportion of impervious areas with direct hydraulic connections in urban land types 
CURBDEN Curb length density in urban land type (km/ha) 
URBCOEF The wash-off coefficient for removal of constituents from the impervious area (mm−1
DIRTMX The maximum amount of solids allowed to build up on impervious areas (kg/curb km) 
THALF Number of days required to accumulate solids from 0 to 1/2 DIRTMX in impervious zone (day) 
TNCONC The concentration of total nitrogen in suspended solid load from impervious areas (mg N/kg sediment) 
TPCONC The concentration of total phosphorus in suspended solid load from impervious areas (mg P/kg sediment) 
TNO3CONC The concentration of nitrate in suspended solid load from impervious areas (mg NO3-N/kg sediment) 
URBCN2 Curve number for an impervious fraction 
ParametersMeanings
FIMP Fraction of total impervious area in urban land 
FCIMP The proportion of impervious areas with direct hydraulic connections in urban land types 
CURBDEN Curb length density in urban land type (km/ha) 
URBCOEF The wash-off coefficient for removal of constituents from the impervious area (mm−1
DIRTMX The maximum amount of solids allowed to build up on impervious areas (kg/curb km) 
THALF Number of days required to accumulate solids from 0 to 1/2 DIRTMX in impervious zone (day) 
TNCONC The concentration of total nitrogen in suspended solid load from impervious areas (mg N/kg sediment) 
TPCONC The concentration of total phosphorus in suspended solid load from impervious areas (mg P/kg sediment) 
TNO3CONC The concentration of nitrate in suspended solid load from impervious areas (mg NO3-N/kg sediment) 
URBCN2 Curve number for an impervious fraction 

In this study, DIRTMX, TNCONC, TPCONC, and TNO3CONC values were determined by monitoring and analyzing the surface deposits in the study area. Currently, two primary surface accumulation sampling methods are commonly used: the dry and wet sampling methods (Li et al. 2015). According to the tools used, the dry sampling method can be subdivided into the brush or broom sweeping method and the vacuum sampling method using a vacuum cleaner. In the wet sampling method, the ground is first cleaned using deionized water, and the mud-water mixture is absorbed through a vacuum cleaner (Chang et al. 2007). In this study, dry sampling of the study area was carried out using a wool brush and an 800 W German Kahl vacuum cleaner, and the sampling process was as follows:

  • (1)

    In the selected sampling region, sampling points are laid along with the street side stones. According to the area of the sampling region, the number of sampling points was determined, with no less than five points in each region. A self-made sampling frame of 1.0 m × 1.0 m was placed at the sampling site to collect the samples in the frame.

  • (2)

    During sampling, a vacuum cleaner was first used to collect dust from the frame horizontally and vertically. Then, the brush was used to sweep the surface of the frame back and forth, removing the particles attached to the surface. Finally, the vacuum cleaner was used again to collect the dust from the frame with three to five repetitions.

  • (3)

    The surface dust collected in the dust collection bag of the vacuum cleaner was moved into a sterile sampling bag and labeled.

The previous study has shown that surface pollutants eventually saturate with the drought duration before rain (Kim et al. 2006; Chang et al. 2007). Through the study of the urban surface pollutant accumulation process, Gastaldini & Silva (2013) found that the surface pollutant content reached saturation when the duration of drought before the rain was more than 7 days. Therefore, this study chose to collect mixed samples within a region under windless conditions with a clear duration of 7 days or more before the rain, avoiding the cleaning time. In this study, the cumulative monitoring points of surface pollutants in the Licun River basin were mainly concentrated in two regions. The sampling area covered 17 km2, including seven types of urban lands in the Licun River basin (Figure 2): high-density residential land (URHD), industrial land (UIDU), transportation land (UTRN), commercial land (UCOM), institutional services land (UINS), medium density residential land (URMD), and low-density residential land (URLD). Surface sediments from each type of urban land within each area were sampled, five times for each type of land. Therefore, the total number of sampling areas for the seven types of urban land in the two overall areas was 70. To determine the values of DIRTMX, TNCONC, TPCONC, and TNO3CONC for the 7 urban land types in the Licun River, 11 cumulative samplings and monitoring of surface pollutants were conducted from September 2020 to April 2021. A total of 350 samples were obtained during the rainy season with high rainfall and the dry season with low rainfall.
Figure 2

Distribution of surface dust sampling areas.

Figure 2

Distribution of surface dust sampling areas.

Close modal

Data processing

According to Cheng et al. (2017), urban rainfall-runoff pollution is mainly caused by fine dust with particles ranging from 50 to 1,000 μm. Therefore, the collected surface accumulations were sieved using metal sieves in this study. Samples of particles smaller than 1 mm are weighed, recorded, and then repeatedly bumped to achieve a uniform distribution of different-sized particles. Each sample was dissolved in 1 L of deionized water with 5 g, and the total nitrogen (TN), nitrate-nitrogen, and total phosphorus (TP) of the mixed water samples were measured. In addition, three sets of parallel samples were set up for each group of samples.

This study uses a combination of basic data collection and on-site monitoring analysis to obtain the relevant data required for SWAT model construction. Data types can be divided into spatial data and surface observation data. Unlike previous studies, there is less agricultural land and larger urban land in the Licun River basin. Therefore, agricultural management data were not collected during data collection. The data and basic information required for SWAT model construction are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Data sources and basic information required for SWAT model construction

Data typeNameSourceDescription
Spatial data Basin topography Geospatial Date Cloud DEM raster data at 30 m resolution 
Basin land types Resource and Environment Science and Date Center Vector data of 1 km × 1 km 
Basin soil type Vector data of 1:1,000,000 
Surface observation data Meteorological data Qingdao Meteorological Bureau Daily data for 2018–2021 
Point source data Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment Daily data on water quantity and quality at replenishment sites from 2018–2021 
Water quality data of control section Monthly cross-sectional data of Shengli Bridge in 2020 and 2021 
Water data from hydrological stations Qingdao Hydrographic Bureau Daily data of Licun hydrological station from 2018 to 2021 
Soil property data Chinese soil database, SPAW software (Liu et al. (2009)Soil property database with updated models 
Property data of urban land type On-site monitoring studies Urban database with updated models 
Data typeNameSourceDescription
Spatial data Basin topography Geospatial Date Cloud DEM raster data at 30 m resolution 
Basin land types Resource and Environment Science and Date Center Vector data of 1 km × 1 km 
Basin soil type Vector data of 1:1,000,000 
Surface observation data Meteorological data Qingdao Meteorological Bureau Daily data for 2018–2021 
Point source data Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment Daily data on water quantity and quality at replenishment sites from 2018–2021 
Water quality data of control section Monthly cross-sectional data of Shengli Bridge in 2020 and 2021 
Water data from hydrological stations Qingdao Hydrographic Bureau Daily data of Licun hydrological station from 2018 to 2021 
Soil property data Chinese soil database, SPAW software (Liu et al. (2009)Soil property database with updated models 
Property data of urban land type On-site monitoring studies Urban database with updated models 

To facilitate the construction of the model, the spatial data must be pre-processed. Figure 3 shows the raw spatial data collected in this study and the processed data.
Figure 3

Raw spatial data and processed data. (a) Processed DEM data. (b) Raw land type data. (c) Reclassified land type data. (d) Soil type data.

Figure 3

Raw spatial data and processed data. (a) Processed DEM data. (b) Raw land type data. (c) Reclassified land type data. (d) Soil type data.

Close modal
In this study, the spatio-temporal uncertainty adaptation algorithm SUFI-2 is selected for model calibration and parameter rate determination. The method is a global sensitivity analysis depending on a multiple regression system between the value of the objective function and the parameters generated by the Latin hypercube. Its expression is given in the following equation (Changxing et al. 2018):
(1)

The relative significance of each parameter bi is determined by t-test; the sensitivity of each parameter is measured by the algorithm output parameter tstat, with larger absolute values indicating high sensitivities.

For the validation of the simulation results of the SWAT model, this study uses the coefficient of determination R2 and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient ENS for a comprehensive evaluation (Ierodiaconou et al. 2005), which is calculated in Equations (2) and (3). When ENS ≥ 0.5 and R2 ≥ 0.6, the model is well fitted (Wang et al. 2010).
(2)
where is the observed value at moment t; is the simulated value at moment t; is the mean of the observed values; ENS is taken from negative infinity to 1, with ENS close to 1 indicating a good fit and high model credibility.
(3)
where is the mean of the simulated values; the value of R2 ranges from 0 to 1, with R2 value closer to 1 representing a higher degree of model fit.

Construction of urban database

The sampling study of the surface accumulation of the urban land types in the Licun River basin was conducted. Afterward, based on the relevant parameter ranges provided in the SWAT Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009 (Winchell 2012) and the existing research results (Zhang et al. 2021), a SWAT model urban database of the Licun River basin was constructed. Among the parameters, FIMP, FCIMP, and CURBDEN were determined from field investigations, DIRTMX, TNCONC, TPCONC, and TNO3CONC were determined from surface sediment examinations, and URBCOEF, THALF, and URBCN2 were determined by referring to the SWAT Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009 (Winchell 2012) with the calibration studies of Feng-Jiao & Tian-Hong (2012) and Zhang et al. (2022) on CN values in the Guanlan River in Shenzhen and the Licun River basin in Qingdao.

As shown in Figure 4, the mean maximum value of DIRTMX of surface sediment of seven urban land types in the Licun River basin is 28.84 kg/km for URLD, and the minimum value is 6.09 kg/km for UINS. The mean maximum value of TNCONC is 83.29 × 103 mg/kg for URHD, and the minimum value is 15.32 × 103 mg/kg for UINS. The maximum mean value of TNO3CONC is 0.53 × 103 mg/kg for UINS, and the minimum value is 0.14 × 103 mg/kg for UINS. The maximum mean value of TPCONC is 7.96 × 103 mg/kg for URHD, and the minimum value is 1.43 × 103 mg/kg for URMD. The initial values for the key parameters of the established SWAT model urban database are shown in Table 3. The measured values of DIRTMX, TNCONC, TNO3CONC, and TPCONC of the SWAT model urban database in the Licun River basin differ significantly from the reference values provided by the SWAT model. This result is because the default parameter values of the SWAT model urban database are based on relevant studies in urban construction areas in the United States, which differ significantly from the current situation of urban nonpoint source pollution in China. Therefore, when constructing the SWAT model to study urban nonpoint source pollution in the basin, the parameter values in the SWAT model urban database must be modified according to local characteristics.
Table 3

Initial values of key parameters in the SWAT model urban database of the Licun River basin

ParametersURHDURMDURLDUIDUUCOMUINSUTRN
FIMP 0.91 0.56 0.39 0.75 0.93 0.43 0.89 
FCIMP 0.8 0.48 0.3 0.71 0.82 0.34 0.88 
CURBDEN (km/km235 31 25 16 27 21 14 
URBCOEF (mm−10.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 
DIRTMX (kg/km) 11.94 23.27 28.17 12.66 9.00 6.09 10.84 
THALF (d) 0.85 0.85 0.85 2.45 1.7 3.95 3.95 
TNCONC (103 mg/kg) 81.38 20.34 18.11 39.87 28.81 16.54 38.84 
TPCONC (103 mg/kg) 9.28 1.74 1.53 3.91 3.59 1.56 4.67 
TNO3CONC (103 mg/kg) 0.61 0.20 0.15 0.53 0.29 0.16 0.32 
URBCN2 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 
ParametersURHDURMDURLDUIDUUCOMUINSUTRN
FIMP 0.91 0.56 0.39 0.75 0.93 0.43 0.89 
FCIMP 0.8 0.48 0.3 0.71 0.82 0.34 0.88 
CURBDEN (km/km235 31 25 16 27 21 14 
URBCOEF (mm−10.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 
DIRTMX (kg/km) 11.94 23.27 28.17 12.66 9.00 6.09 10.84 
THALF (d) 0.85 0.85 0.85 2.45 1.7 3.95 3.95 
TNCONC (103 mg/kg) 81.38 20.34 18.11 39.87 28.81 16.54 38.84 
TPCONC (103 mg/kg) 9.28 1.74 1.53 3.91 3.59 1.56 4.67 
TNO3CONC (103 mg/kg) 0.61 0.20 0.15 0.53 0.29 0.16 0.32 
URBCN2 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 
Figure 4

Results of surface sediment monitoring for urban land types of the Licun River basin. (a) DIRTMX (b) TNCONC (c) TNO3CONC (d) TPCONC.

Figure 4

Results of surface sediment monitoring for urban land types of the Licun River basin. (a) DIRTMX (b) TNCONC (c) TNO3CONC (d) TPCONC.

Close modal

Model calibration and validation

The river conditions of the Licun River basin generated by the SWAT model are consistent with the actual ones, with 30 sub-basins divided by the model. Based on the characteristics of the Licun River basin, the soil type area threshold set in this study is 5%, the land type area threshold is 5%, and the slope is divided into three levels: <7, 7 to 13, and >13%, with a total of 233 HRUs. Sensitivity analysis of the parameters was performed by SUIF-2 to identify the 10 parameters in the basin that are most sensitive to runoff, nitrogen loads, and phosphorus loads. Among these parameters, the bank flow constant (ALPHA_BNK), the overland flow Manning coefficient (OV_N), the Manning coefficient (CH_N2), and the saturation permeability coefficient (SOL_K) are the most sensitive ones for the simulation of runoff. In addition, nitrate concentration in precipitation (RCN_SUB_BSN), nitrogen fixation coefficient (FIXCO), biological rate of ammonium conversion of organic nitrogen (BC3), and biological rate of nitrite nitrification (BC2) were the most sensitive to the simulation of TN; organic P in baseflow (LAT_ORGP), organic P enrichment ratio (ERORGP), and phosphorus sorption coefficient (PSP) were the most sensitive to the simulation of TP (Figure 5). In this study, water quantity data from the Licun hydrological station and water quality data of the Shengli Bridge cross-section for the years 2018–2021 in the Licun River basin were collected. Based on the collected data, the runoff and water quality of the Licun hydrological station and Shengli Bridge cross-section were calibrated and validated. The simulation step was set to month, and ENS ≥ 0.5 and R2 ≥ 0.6 are used as the criteria to judge the end of the run.
Figure 5

Analysis results of parameter sensitivity in the study area.

Figure 5

Analysis results of parameter sensitivity in the study area.

Close modal
The analysis results of simulated and measured values of monthly runoff, TP load, and TN load are shown in Figure 6. The ENS for the runoff calibration period is 0.75, and the R2 is 0.76; the ENS for the validation period is 0.71, and the R2 is 0.73. Moreover, the ENS for the calibration periods of TN load and TP load are 0.81 and 0.81, respectively, and the R2 are 0.81 and 0.84, respectively; the ENS for the validation periods of monthly TN load and TP load are 0.83 and 0.74, respectively, and the R2 are 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. It can be seen that the model simulation results have a high degree of confidence and fit well with the actual values.
Figure 6

Simulation of runoff, TN, and TP by SWAT model. (a) Runoff calibration period. (b) Runoff validation period. (c) TN calibration period. (d) TN verification period. (e) TP calibration period. (f) TP verification period.

Figure 6

Simulation of runoff, TN, and TP by SWAT model. (a) Runoff calibration period. (b) Runoff validation period. (c) TN calibration period. (d) TN verification period. (e) TP calibration period. (f) TP verification period.

Close modal

Spatial distribution characteristics of urban nonpoint source pollution in the basin

The spatial distribution characteristics of the output load of nonpoint source pollution per unit area of TN and TP in the Licun River basin in 2021 and the contribution rate of the output nonpoint source pollution load of each type of the functional area to the total load were analyzed by the SWAT model (Figures 7 and 8). In 2021, the nonpoint source pollution output load of the TN unit area in the Licun River basin is highest in sub-basins 16, 9, 23, and 12, ranging from 21,757.97 to 58,871.16 kg/km2. The nonpoint source pollution output load per unit area of TP is highest in sub-basins 16, 9, 12, and 19, ranging from 6,054.30 to 54,173.85 kg/km2. Among the seven urban land types in the Licun River basin, the contribution of TN and TP load from UTRN is the highest, accounting for 34.61 and 35.20%, respectively; the contribution of TN load from UINS is the lowest, accounting for 0.57%; the contribution of TP load from URMD is the lowest, accounting for 0.15%.
Figure 7

Spatial distribution of annual output load of nonpoint source pollution per unit area of TN and TP in the Licun River basin in 2021. (a) TN output load per unit area. (b) TP output load per unit area.

Figure 7

Spatial distribution of annual output load of nonpoint source pollution per unit area of TN and TP in the Licun River basin in 2021. (a) TN output load per unit area. (b) TP output load per unit area.

Close modal
Figure 8

TN (a) and TP (b) contribution rate of nonpoint source pollution loads from land types in the Licun River basin in 2021.

Figure 8

TN (a) and TP (b) contribution rate of nonpoint source pollution loads from land types in the Licun River basin in 2021.

Close modal

Characteristics of the temporal distribution of urban nonpoint source pollution in the basin

The main input point source of the Licun River basin is the tailwater from the sewage treatment plants built along the mainstream. By using the collected daily variation data of tailwater quantity and water quality of each water purification plant in the Licun River basin in 2021, a point source input database of the SWAT model was established. Based on this model, the contribution of TN load and TP load to the urban nonpoint source pollution water bodies in the Licun River basin in 2021 was analyzed (Figure 9). In 2021, the TN load and TP load from rainfall-runoff pollution in the Licun River basin from April to September were higher than those from January to March and from October to December, and the rainfall-runoff pollution in the Licun River basin was the most serious in July, with TN load and TP load of 33.91 t and 21.05 t, respectively.
Figure 9

TN (a) and TP (b) loads of urban nonpoint source pollution in the Licun River basin in 2021.

Figure 9

TN (a) and TP (b) loads of urban nonpoint source pollution in the Licun River basin in 2021.

Close modal

By sampling and monitoring the surface sediments of seven types of urban land in the Licun River basin, the SWAT model urban database was constructed, and the parameters were calibrated in a localized manner. Sensitivity analysis of the parameters showed that: The parameters RCN_SUB_BSN, FIXCO, and BC3 are most sensitive to the simulation of monthly TN load, and the parameters LAT_ORGP, ERORGP, and PSP are most sensitive to the simulation of monthly TP load. In addition, the ENS and the R2 of the constructed SWAT model for the simulation validation period of runoff, TP load, and TN load of the control section suggest an excellent fit to the actual values and high confidence of the simulation results.

By using the corrected SWAT model, the spatial and temporal distribution characteristic analysis of TN and TP in the Licun River basin in 2021 revealed that the highest spatial distribution of TN and TP unit area annual output loads are 58,871.16 and 54,173.85 kg/km2, respectively. Among seven urban land types, the contribution of TN and TP load from UTRN is the highest, accounting for 34.61 and 35.20%, respectively; the contribution of TN load from UINS is the lowest, accounting for 0.57%; the contribution of TP load from URMD is the lowest, accounting for 0.15%. The TN load and TP load from rainfall-runoff pollution from April to September are higher than those in the rest of the months and the most polluted rainfall-runoff is in July.

The authors would like to thank Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment for providing the historical data.

Minghui Zhang developed the methodology and software, validated the article, conducted a formal analysis and data curation, and wrote the original draft. Lin Wang conceptualized the whole article, wrote the review, edited the article, supervised the work, and conducted funding acquisition. Xuda Huang conducted investigation, brought resources, reviewed & edited the article, and administered the project. Zhonghua Yu brought resources, reviewed & edited the article, and administered the project.

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [NO.2018YFC0408000,2018YFC0408004] and the Jinan Water Science and Technology Project [JNSWKJ202103].

Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abdelwahab
O. M. M.
,
Ricci
G. F.
,
De Girolamo
A. M.
&
Gentile
F.
2018
Modelling soil erosion in a Mediterranean watershed: comparison between SWAT and AnnAGNPS models
.
Environmental Research
166
,
363
376
.
Arnold
J. G.
,
Kiniry
J. R.
,
Srinivasan
R.
,
Williams
J. R.
&
Haney
E. B.
2011
Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation
.
Blackland Research and Extension Center
,
Temple, TX
.
Chang
J.
,
Min
L.
,
Hou
L. J.
,
Yuan
X. S.
,
Lin
X.
&
Siaka
B.
2007
Concept, pollution character and environmental effect of urban surface dust
.
The Journal of Applied Ecology
18
,
1153
1158
.
Changxing
L. U.
,
Wang
J.
,
Gong
X.
&
Sun
X.
2018
Study on runoff simulation in Zhuzhaoxin River Basin by SWAT model
.
Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering
35
,
59
67
.
Cheng
X.
,
Chen
L.
&
Sun
R.
2017
Estimation of non-point source pollution loads of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region considering precipitation and topography
.
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
4
,
72
79
.
Ding
J. L.
&
Zheng
F. L.
2004
SWAT model and its application
.
Research of Soil and Water Conservation
11
,
128
130
.
Feng-Jiao
B.
&
Tian-Hong
L. I.
2012
GIS and L-THIA based analysis on variations of non-point pollution in the Guanlan River watershed, Shenzhen
.
Environmental Science
33
,
2667
.
Gastaldini
M.
&
Silva
A.
2013
Pollutant distribution on urban surfaces: case study in southern Brazil
.
Journal of Environmental Engineering
139
,
269
276
.
He
J.
,
Wu
X.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Zheng
B.
,
Meng
D.
,
Zhou
H.
,
Lu
L.
,
Deng
W.
,
Shao
Z.
&
Qin
Y.
2020
Management of water quality targets based on river-lake water quality response relationships for lake basins – a case study of Dianchi Lake
.
Environmental Research
186
, 109479.
Ierodiaconou
D.
,
Laurenson
L.
,
Leblanc
M.
,
Stagnitti
F.
,
Duff
G.
,
Salzman
S.
&
Versace
V.
2005
The consequences of land use change on nutrient exports: a regional scale assessment in south-west Victoria, Australia
.
Journal of Environmental Management
74
,
305
316
.
Kim
L. H.
,
Zoh
K. D.
,
Jeong
S. M.
,
Kayhanian
M.
&
Stenstrom
M. K.
2006
Estimating pollutant mass accumulation on highways during dry periods
.
Journal of Environmental Engineering
132
,
985
993
.
Li
Z.
,
Zhang
G.
,
Yu
X.
,
Liu
Q.
&
Zhang
X. C.
2015
Phosphorus loss and its estimation in a small watershed of the Yimeng mountainous area, China
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
73
,
1205
1216
.
Liu
R. M.
,
Yang
Z. F.
,
Shen
Z. Y.
,
Yu
S. L.
,
Ding
X. W.
,
Wu
X.
&
Liu
F.
2009
Estimating nonpoint source pollution in the upper Yangtze River using the export coefficient model, remote sensing, and geographical information system
.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
135
,
698
704
.
Marin
M.
,
Clinciu
I.
,
Tudose
N. C.
,
Ungurean
C.
,
Adorjani
A.
,
Mihalache
A. L.
,
Davidescu
A. A.
,
Davidescu
S. O.
,
Dinca
L.
&
Cacovean
H.
2020
Assessing the vulnerability of water resources in the context of climate changes in a small forested watershed using SWAT: a review
.
Environmental Research
184
, 109330.
Radcliffe
D. E.
&
Cabrera
M. L.
2006
Modeling Phosphorus in the Environment
.
Soil Science Society of America Journal, CRC Pr I Llc
,
Boca Raton
.
Wang
Z.
,
Du
Q.
,
Zhao
D.
&
Bo
C.
2010
Simulation on the effects of non-point source pollution in Qingjiang River basin based on SWAT model and GIS
. In:
17th International Conference on Geoinformatics/Aug 12–14
,
George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA
.
Winchell
M.
2012
ArcSWAT 2009 User Guide
.
The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press
,
Zhengzhou
.
Zhang
J.
,
Tao
S.
,
Liu
M.
,
Yu
W.
,
Liu
J.
&
Li
J.
2011
Research on non-point source pollution spatial distribution of Qingdao based on L-THIA model
.
Mathematical & Computer Modelling
54
,
1151
1159
.
Zhang
M.
,
Wang
L.
&
Huang
X.
2021
Analysis on the treatment measures, effects and difficulties of black and smelly water body of Licun River in Qingdao
.
China Water & Wastewater
37
(
14
),
23
31
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).