Abstract
Ozone advanced oxidation has been widely used in water treatment, but little research has been reported on the application of ozone to difficult-to-degrade mineral wastewater. In this paper, the effect of ozonation application in the treatment of copper mineral processing wastewater, which is difficult to be effectively treated by traditional processes due to its complex composition, was investigated. The effects of ozonation time, ozone concentration, temperature and pH on the degradation of organic compounds in the wastewater by ozonation were researched. It was found that the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the wastewater could be reduced by 83.02% by ozonation under optimal treatment conditions. In addition, the mechanism of ozone degradation of the difficult-to-degrade wastewater was studied, and the reasons for the fluctuating variations of COD and ammonia nitrogen during ozonation treatment were explained.
HIGHLIGHTS
The mechanism of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and NH3-N removal in actual copper mineral processing wastewater (CMPW) treated by ozone was analyzed.
The effect of ozone-treating CMPW did not necessarily get better with the increase in temperature.
Ozonation showed a better treatment effect on CMPW under alkaline conditions.
COD concentration fell with ozonation time, then rose and finally fell.
NH3-N concentration rose and fell twice with ozonation time.
INTRODUCTION
Mineral processing wastewater contains many harmful components, which will cause pollution to surrounding water, air and soil if discharged directly. Therefore, mineral processing wastewater will be recycled in most cases. However, if the beneficiation wastewater is not effectively treated, it can cause great damage to the recovery and grade of valuable minerals during recycling (Farrokhpay & Zanin 2012; Li et al. 2021). In addition, the treatment of mineral processing wastewater is related to the development of the mineral industry (Jing et al. 2020), which in turn affects national political and economic policies. Therefore, the treatment of mineral processing wastewater is particularly important. At present, some technologies have been applied to the treatment of mineral processing wastewater and certain achievements have been made. For example, electrocoagulation was applied to the treatment of Pb/Zn sulfide mineral processing wastewater and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was reduced from 424.29 to 72.9 mg/L (Jing et al. 2020). It was also reported the electrocoagulation could neutralize the pH of the wastewater from 2.83 and reduce the TSS content from 131.04 to 9.5 mg/L (Alam et al. 2021). The biological treatment of mine drainage using sulfate-reducing bacteria achieved a sulfate removal of 94.15 ± 1.76% (Vieira et al. 2021). In addition, there were some combined treatment methods. For example, an aquatic treatment pond of Typha latifolia Linn had been used to treat the Pb/Zn mine wastewater, the total suspended solids and COD of which were reduced by 99 and 55%, respectively (Lan et al. 1992). These methods had a certain treatment effect on the mineral processing wastewater, but the treated wastewater still could not meet the emission requirement. Therefore, more research was required to refine the treatment of mineral processing wastewater.
Ozone has been increasingly used in industrial wastewater treatment. It was found that ozone has good treatment effect on industrial wastewater and no secondary pollution is produced after ozone treatment (Chen et al. 2022). Ozone can produce a variety of free radicals in water, which has a significant effect on improving the removal of refractory organic matter (Konsowa 2003; Konsowa et al. 2010). Ozone starts advanced oxidation only when it decomposes to produce free radicals. And after degrading the dissolved organic matter in water, it was able to degrade the large organic matter gathered by tiny particles of organic matter (Indah Dianawati et al. 2018). This reflects the potential of ozonation in the application of the treatment of difficult-to-degrade organic matter. In this paper, ozonation was systematic studied apply to degrade organic matter in copper mineral processing wastewater (CMPW). The effects of the ozonation time, ozone concentration, temperature and pH on the degradation of the wastewater were explored. Finally, the mechanism of the removal of COD and ammonia nitrogen was discussed, which provided a basis for the future application of ozone in refractory industrial wastewater.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The experimental process
The flow of 99.99% oxygen in the cylinder required for the reaction was regulated by the D07-19B flow controller (Beijing SevenStar Flow Co., Ltd) to enter the ozone generator, then oxygen was converted into ozone by the ozone generator, and finally ozone reacted with 500 mL of wastewater in the conical flask.
The detection method of COD and ammonia nitrogen used is an optical device 5B-6C (V8) multi-parameter water quality analyzer is used to obtain a specific wavelength of ultraviolet light, so that it is incident vertically through the water sample to be measured using electronic information technology to process the light signal intensity before and after the solution based on the Beer–Lambert law, and the relation model of absorbance and concentration was established to detect COD and ammonia nitrogen in this paper.
Experimental conditions
The experimental conditions used were laboratory temperature 294.65 K, temperature of copper mineral processing wastewater 296.15 K, pH 7, the initial COD 138.4 mg/L, the initial concentration of ammonia nitrogen 1.83 mg/L, ozone flow rate 70 L/h, ozone concentration 58.7 g/m3 (using INUSA MINI-HICON online concentration monitor to detect the gas-phase ozone concentration at the inlet), the volume of the CMPW: 500 mL, ozonation time (ozone) 7 min. If there are differences below, they will be explained separately.
Chemicals
The chemicals used were sulfuric acid (AP, Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd), sodium hydroxide (AP, Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd), potassium amyl xanthate (superior quality, JI AN Tianzhuo Flotation Reagent Co., Ltd), butylxanthate (superior quality, JI AN Tianzhuo Flotation Reagent Co., Ltd), ammonium dibutyl dithiophosphate (qualified product, JI AN Tianzhuo Flotation Reagent Co., Ltd), No. 2 oil (first-class product, JI AN Tianzhuo Flotation Reagent Co., Ltd), fulvic acid (purity ≥98%, Hefei Chisheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd) and humic acid (purity ≥97%, Hefei Chisheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd).
RESULTS
Effect of ozonation time
Effect of aeration time on treatment effect (T = 296.15 K, pH = 7, n = 58.7 g/m3). (T = temperature of wastewater; t = time; n = concentration of ozone).
Effect of aeration time on treatment effect (T = 296.15 K, pH = 7, n = 58.7 g/m3). (T = temperature of wastewater; t = time; n = concentration of ozone).
The COD and ammonia nitrogen showed different changes with the increase of the ozonation time. With the increase of ozonation time, the COD first decreased greatly, then raised slightly, and finally decreased slowly. Unlike the COD, the concentration of ammonia nitrogen raised sharply at start, then quickly dropped to near the initial concentration, soon raised again to the highest point and finally slowly dropped. The whole change process of the ammonia nitrogen concentration showed two uptrends with the increase of ozonation time (Figure 1). The COD (34.16 mg/L) was lower than the national emission standard class I-A (50 mg/L, GB 18918-2002) after ozonation, and the concentration of ammonia nitrogen was also lower than the national emission standard class I-A (5 mg/L, GB 18918-2002) after ozonation. The complex changes of COD and ammonia nitrogen show that the reaction process of ozone-treating CMPW is relatively complicated, which is worth research. The complex change process was explained in the discussion part.
Effect of ozone concentration
Effect of ozone concentration on the treatment effect (T = 296.15 K, pH = 7).
The COD showed a variation of increase slowly except a slight decrease at the beginning when the ozone concentration was 4.5 g/m3, and the final COD value was higher than the initial value. While the final COD value was much lower than its initial value when the ozone concentration was 58.7 g/m3 (Figure 2). The rising and falling sequences of the ammonia nitrogen concentration in the CMPW were opposite when the ozone concentrations are 4.5 and 58.7 g/m3 (Figure 2). The results further confirmed that the reaction of CMPW and ozone under different ozone concentrations was different.
Effect of temperature
Effect of temperature on the treatment effect (pH = 7, n = 58.7 g/m3, t = 7 min).
Effect of temperature on the treatment effect (pH = 7, n = 58.7 g/m3, t = 7 min).
The effect of ozone-treating CMPW did not necessarily get better with the increase of temperature, and the treatment effects at 303.15 and 313.15 K were slightly lower than 293.15 K (Figure 3). When the temperature was lower than 293.15 K in the experimental range, increasing the temperature would improve the reaction rate. However, when the temperature changed in the other range in the experiment, the increase of temperature would accelerate the rate of ozone escaping from the water. Thus, the ozone concentration in the liquid phase was decreased and the balance of the reaction was moved to the reverse direction which slowed the reaction rate of ozone and organic matter. Therefore, the COD of 303.15 K after the reaction was greater than 293.15 K. High temperatures can affect the properties of some flotation agents remaining in CMPW, such as xanthate, which is formed by the treatment of alcohol with carbon disulfide in the presence of an alkali at certain temperatures (288.15–308.15 K) (Wang 2016), so the curve showed a downward trend when the temperature was at 313.15 K. The result shows that the change of ammonia nitrogen was closely related to the organic matter in the CMPW (Figure 3).
Effect of pH
The effect of pH on the treatment effect (T = 296.15 K, n = 58.7 g/m3, t = 7 min).
The effect of pH on the treatment effect (T = 296.15 K, n = 58.7 g/m3, t = 7 min).
Ozone showed a better treatment effect on CMPW under alkaline conditions (Figure 4). The degradation of organic matter in the CMPW will cause changes in the ammonia nitrogen concentration. The more organic matter is degraded by ozone, the greater the ammonia nitrogen concentration. But when the pH of the solution was greater than 7 (Jiang 2020), the content of NH3-N in the wastewater gradually increased, resulting in particle ammonia gas escaping from the water, which reduced the ammonia nitrogen concentration under alkaline conditions. The acid will degrade some substances that produce ammonia nitrogen in the mineral processing wastewater, which explains why the COD of wastewater under acidic conditions was lower than that under neutral conditions while the ammonia nitrogen concentration was not higher than under neutral conditions. In general, the treatment effect under acidic or alkaline conditions is better than the neutral conditions due to the complexity of CMPW. Furthermore, alkaline conditions show the best result.
Treatment effects
In order to study the best treatment efficiency of CMPW by ozonation, an experiment was conducted using the optimal parameters of the above-influencing factors. The results showed that the COD decreased from 138.4 to 23.5 mg/L and the ammonia nitrogen concentration increased from 1.83 to 2.33 mg/L (T = 296.15 K, n = 58.7 g/m3, t = 7 min, pH = 9). The removal of COD in wastewater was up to about 83% under the best conditions. Although the ammonia nitrogen concentration raised slightly, it is far lower than the national emission standard. All experiments prove that ozone can be well applied to CMPW treatment. According to the calculation, the cost of the ozone treatment is 0.3 cents/L when this effect is achieved.
DISCUSSION
The nature of COD changes with ozonation time
The distribution of wastewater components at different aeration time.
The Rayleigh scattering phenomenon is not analyzed here (Moriel et al. 2019). According to the corresponding analysis, the raw wastewater contains soluble microbial products-like (SMP) (Barker & Stuckey 1999) and humic acid-like (El Fallah et al. 2018). These two types of substances were degraded after 7 min of ozonation (Figure 5 and Table 1). The composition of SMP is very complex, which contains humic, fulvic acids, polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, organic acids, amino acids, antibiotics, steroids, exocellular enzymes, siderophores, structural components of cells, and products of energy metabolism (Barker & Stuckey 1999). Not only that, the SMP produced by the anaerobic process also contains alkenes, alkanes, and aromatic hydrocarbons. Although the components of SMP are diverse, only the humus, polysaccharides and proteins are commonly present in various situations (Liu et al. 2002).
Division of fluorescent region
Region . | Range (Em/Ex) . | Name . |
---|---|---|
I | 250 < Em < 330 nm, Ex < 250 nm | Tyrosine protein-like |
II | 330 < Em < 380 nm, Ex < 250 nm | Tryptophan protein-like |
III | Em > 380 nm, Ex < 250 nm | Fulvic acid-like |
IV | Em > 380 nm, Ex > 250 nm | Humic acid-like |
V | Em < 380 nm, Ex > 250 nm | Soluble microbial product-like |
Region . | Range (Em/Ex) . | Name . |
---|---|---|
I | 250 < Em < 330 nm, Ex < 250 nm | Tyrosine protein-like |
II | 330 < Em < 380 nm, Ex < 250 nm | Tryptophan protein-like |
III | Em > 380 nm, Ex < 250 nm | Fulvic acid-like |
IV | Em > 380 nm, Ex > 250 nm | Humic acid-like |
V | Em < 380 nm, Ex > 250 nm | Soluble microbial product-like |
The distribution of the different substances in the three-dimensional fluorescence spectrum is shown.
In the beginning, dissolved organic matter of IV and V regions and residual flotation agents in CMPW were oxidized and degraded by ozonation, which greatly reduced the COD. With continuous ozonation, some protein-like substances and humic acid-like (Figure 5(b) and 5(c)) in the wastewater were oxidized by strong oxidizing free radicals, which cause the COD in the CMPW that showed a slight raise (Figure 7). Finally, the COD showed a downward trend again after all small molecules were degraded. Furthermore, the COD of the humic acid solution did not change when ozonation was started, indicating that the nature of humic acid is relatively stable and wastewater-containing humic acid is difficult to be treated. With the increase of ozonation time, the concentration of ozone in the water increases, producing a lot of strong oxidizing free radicals. These free radicals can oxidize the humic acid in the solution, which proves again that the oxidizing ability of free radicals is higher than the ozone molecules.
The nature of ammonia nitrogen changing with ozonation time
The ammonia nitrogen concentration showed a change of two uptrends and downtrends with the increase of ozonation time (Figure 1). The chemical stability of ammonia is stable, and the reaction rate between ammonia and ozone is slow. A large amount of NH3-N cannot be oxidized to NO2-N. Moreover, nitrogenous organic matter can be oxidized into ammonia nitrogen by ozone (Wang et al. 2010), thereby increasing the concentration of ammonia nitrogen in wastewater. Dissolved organic nitrogen in the aquatic environment commonly occurs as amino acids, peptides and proteins and accounts for 0.5–10% (by mass) of the dissolved organic matter (Sharma & Graham 2010).
The ammonia nitrogen concentration of protein and fulvic acid solution increased firstly and then decreased with the increase of ozonation time (Figure 9). In addition, the protein-like substance and fulvic acid-like substance were produced during the process of ozone-treating CMPW (Figure 5(c)), which caused the concentration of ammonia nitrogen to rise in the second stage. Protein-like substances are gradually degraded by ozone. Firstly, the spatial structure of the protein is destroyed to form peptide chains, then the hydroxyl destroys the primary structure of the protein (Zhu et al. 2011). The peptide chains are decomposed into amino acids, which react with the hydroxyl radicals of ozone decomposition. Nitrate, ammonia, carbonyl, and carboxylic acid are formed in this process (Sharma & Graham 2010), which increase the concentration of ammonia nitrogen in solution. Fulvic acid-like is oxidized by ozone to produce ammonia nitrogen, and fulvic acid-like is easily soluble in water. Therefore, fulvic acid-like needs to be degraded and removed. Finally, ozone or strong oxidizing free radicals will react with ammonia nitrogen when all substances are completely oxidized, which made the concentration of ammonia nitrogen that showed a last downward trend.
CONCLUSIONS
There have been many methods to treat copper mine wastewater, but none of them achieved good results. However, the ozone treatment of copper mine wastewater shows superiorities of high efficiency and without secondary pollution. The removal of COD reached to 83% in this paper. Meanwhile, other emission indicators such as metal ion concentration could meet the requirements of national emission standards in the experiments. Therefore, ozone advanced oxidation is a promising technology for mine wastewater treatment that will be continuously optimized and improved in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by Jiangxi Province's Major Subject Academic and Technical Leaders Training Program Leading Talent Project (grant number 20204BCJ22016), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51867018).
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.