Coking wastewater is a typical organic refractory wastewater characterized by high chemical oxygen demand (COD), NH4+-N, and total organic carbon (TOC). Herein, coking wastewater was treated using a heterogeneous electro-Fenton (EF) system comprising a novel iron-loaded needle coke composite cathode (Fe-NCCC) and a dimensionally stable anode. The response surface methodology was used to optimize the reaction conditions. The predicted and actual COD removal rates were 92.13 and 89.96% under optimum conditions of an applied voltage of 4.92 V, an electrode spacing of 2.29 cm, and an initial pH of 3.01. The optimized removal rate of NH4+-N and TOC was 84.12 and 73.44%, respectively. The color of coking wastewater decreased from 250-fold to colorless, and the BOD5/COD increased from 0.126 to 0.34. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy show that macromolecular heterocyclic organic compounds decomposed into straight-chain small molecules and even completely mineralized. The energy consumption of the EF process was 23.5 RMB Yuan per cubic meter of coking wastewater. The EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC can effectively remove pollutants from coking wastewater, has low electricity consumption, and can simultaneously reduce various pollution indicators with potential applications in the treatment of high-concentration and difficult-to-degrade organic wastewater.

  • A novel needle coke composite cathode was fabricated to treat coking wastewater.

  • The maximum COD removal was ∼90% using an electro-Fenton process.

  • The COD, -N, and TOC removal rates were optimized using the Box–Behnken design.

  • Macromolecular organic matter in coking wastewater was degraded after treatment.

Coking wastewater is refractory industrial wastewater produced during coal coking, gas purification, and recovery and refining of chemical products (Ahmed et al. 2010; Meng et al. 2023); originates from residual ammonia recovery, gas desulfurization, and coal tar purification recovery (Garcia-Segura et al. 2012); and comprises a large number of organic and inorganic pollutants (Kim et al. 2008). Coking wastewater comprises organic compounds such as phenols, benzene series, and polycyclic aromatic compounds; heterocyclic organic compounds containing nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur; and inorganic substances including sulfate ions, chloride ions, and ammonium salts (Saidi et al. 2019). Among them, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phenols are highly toxic pollutants. If coking wastewater is discharged without effective degradation, it can harm the ecological environment and human beings (Borràs et al. 2013).

Owing to the complexity of coking wastewater components, coagulation and precipitation, air flotation, membrane separation, adsorption, biochemical methods, and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are used to some extent to treat coking wastewater (Güçlü et al. 2013; Li et al. 2015). AOPs have been widely used by researchers and engineers for coking wastewater treatment because of their highly efficient degradation, environmental friendliness, and strong ability to remove organic pollutants (Su et al. 2019). Currently, AOPs used in coking wastewater treatment mainly include ozone catalytic oxidation, various Fenton reactions (Farid et al. 2021), and photochemical oxidation methods. Among them, an electro-Fenton (EF) reaction is one of the most promising AOPs because of its requirement for few added chemicals, strong controllability of the electrolysis process, easily automated operation, and low secondary pollution (Ou et al. 2020). The main principle of an EF process is that Fe2+ and/or H2O2 are continuously generated using an electric field, and a Fenton reaction occurs between Fe2+ and H2O2 to produce with strong oxidizability to mineralize pollutants (Equations (1)–(5)) (Zhou et al. 2020).
formula
(1)
formula
(2)
formula
(3)
formula
(4)
formula
(5)

Deng et al. (2019). reported on a novel tripolyphosphate (TPP)-assisted EF process for the treatment of coking wastewater. The high efficiency of the TPP-assisted EF process in neutral pH was attributed to the newly formed Fe–O–P coordination of the iron ligand complex (Fe2+-TPP), which activated oxygen to generate and degraded organic matter. K. Zhao et al. (2019) and Q. Zhao et al. (2019) fabricated a highly efficient fluorine-containing activated carbon catalyst to treat coking wastewater via fluoridation modification. The fluorination-modified catalyst exhibited a high H2O2 yield and completely degraded phenol in 15 min. Zhou et al. treated coking wastewater using an EF system comprising an Fe sheet as the anode and graphite as the cathode, followed by peroxy-coagulation (Zhou et al. 2020), and the removal rate of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in this EF system was 70%. Fe-functionalized carbonaceous-material–based cathodes are the most widely studied functionalized cathodes for the EF treatment of organic pollutants because they can in situ produce a large amount of H2O2 during electrolysis using carbonaceous materials (Ganiyu et al. 2018; Poza-Nogueiras et al. 2018) and provide Fe2+ for the Fenton reaction. Needle coke is a new type of carbon material with an excellent structure and performance. It is used as the raw material for the production of ultrahigh-power electrodes, special carbon materials, carbon fibers, composite materials, and other high-end carbon products. Needle coke exhibits advantages such as good electrical conductivity, low specific resistance, a small thermal expansion coefficient, and high mechanical strength (Yang et al. 2013; Kondrasheva et al. 2020; Gabdulkhakov et al. 2021). After modification, the electrochemical activity of carbon materials changes, and the modified needle coke exhibits increased specific surface area and electrical conductivity. In a previous study, our group fabricated a novel iron-loaded needle coke composite cathode (Fe-NCCC), and rhodamine B (RhB) was used as the target pollutant to demonstrate the powerful decolorization (∼100%) and COD removal capability (81.6%) of the Fe-NCCC (Chi et al. 2022). However, despite its complex molecular structure, RhB is a single pollutant, and coking wastewater contains many complex organic substances with high pollution indicators such as COD, ammonia nitrogen (-N), and total organic carbon (TOC). The EF system constructed using the Fe-NCCC is intriguing and promising for the treatment of coking wastewater. The removal conditions of each pollution index, removal mechanism, and removal rates of various characteristic pollutants are important references for examining the performance of the Fe-NCCC electrode and can also be the theoretical basis and design parameters for the final application of this electrode in the treatment of coking wastewater and other similar wastewater.

Herein, a novel needle coke composite electrode was fabricated for the treatment of coking wastewater. Based on the single-factor experimental results, a Box–Behnken design (BBD) response surface experiment was designed. Using the applied voltage, electrode spacing, and initial pH as the influencing factors and COD, -N, and TOC as the response values, respectively, three second-order regression models were established and tested. The reaction conditions of the EF system for the treatment of coking wastewater were optimized. Furthermore, the degradation mechanism of organic matter in coking wastewater using the EF system was analyzed via gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy.

Target wastewater

The coking wastewater used in the experiments was obtained from a steel plant in Anshan, China. The characteristics of coking wastewater are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Characteristics of coking wastewater

CODCr (mg·L−1)-N (mg·L−1)pHColor (folds)TDS (ms·cm−1)TOC (mg·L−1)
1,761 119 8.91 250 3.105 408 
CODCr (mg·L−1)-N (mg·L−1)pHColor (folds)TDS (ms·cm−1)TOC (mg·L−1)
1,761 119 8.91 250 3.105 408 

Main materials and experimental device

The experimental device includes an electrolytic cell, a DC-regulated power supply (SG1731SC3A, Shanghai Wenkai Power Equipment Co., LTD), an aeration pump (BT-100CA, Chongqing Jieheng Peristaltic Pump Co., LTD), and electrodes. The electrolytic cell is a transparent plexiglass reactor with a dimensionally stable anode (DSA) and the self-made Fe-NCCC as the cathode. The Fe-NCCC was made using iron-loaded activated carbon and modified needle coke. The cathode preparation method and its characterization are described in the article from our group (Chi et al. 2022). The aeration pump provided oxygen to the reaction system.

Coconut shell–based activated carbon, used as the Fenton catalyst carrier and electrode carbon material, was purchased from Anshan Activated Carbon Factory. Needle coke, used as the main carbon electrode material and conductive agent, was procured from Anshan Kai Carbon Thermal Energy Material Co., Ltd. Polytetrafluoroethylene was purchased from Shanxi Lizhiyuan Battery Material Co., Ltd. HNO3, (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2·6H2O, and other chemicals used in the experiment were of analytical grade. All solutions were prepared using deionized water.

Analysis methods

The COD and -N were evaluated using the standard method (Huang et al. 2016). TOC was measured via the combustion–oxidation–IR absorption method with a InnovOx laboratory-type TOC analyzer (GE Analytical Instruments' Sievers) using 30% sodium persulfate as oxidant, 6 molL−1 phosphate as a buffer solution, and 5% sodium carbonate as absorbent. The color was measured via the dilution method. The types of oxygen-containing functional groups present in the samples were studied using FT-IR spectroscopy (Nicolet iS 10), and the changes in the species and molecular structures of organic compounds in wastewater were investigated using a gas chromatography–mass spectrometer (7890A/5975C).

The electrical energy consumption (EC) per unit mass of COD and specific EC per unit volume of coking wastewater were calculated using Equations (6) and (7):
formula
(6)
formula
(7)
where U, I, and t are the applied voltage (V), applied current (A), and reaction time (h) of the EF process; ΔC is the concentration of the removed COD (mg·L−1); and V is the wastewater volume (L).

Effect of reaction conditions on the treatment of coking wastewater

There are a number of variables that influence the treatment of coking wastewater by EF, such as applied voltage, initial pH, temperature, and organic composition. We selected three of these factors that have a more significant impact and are more controllable for field application to investigate.

Initial pH

As shown in Figure 1(a), the COD removal rate first increases and then decreases with an increase in initial pH. The optimal COD removal rate of 82.06% is obtained at an initial pH of 3, consistent with the optimal initial pH (2.8–3.5) reported in the literature (Gholikandi & Kazemirad 2018). When the pH of the solution is <3, the concentration of H+ in the solution is high, and H+ accepts electrons at the cathode, leading to the hydrogen evolution side reaction (Equation (8)) that blocks the source of hydrogen peroxide and the hydroxyl radical. However, when the pH is >3 and neutral, the concentration of H+ in the solution decreases, and oxygen is reduced at the cathode (Equation (9)), which increases the concentration of OH in the solution, and Fe3+ and Fe2+ precipitate in the system affecting the effective utilization of the catalyst (Zheng et al. 2019). A too high or low solution pH affects the wastewater degradation rate and is not conducive to the degradation of macromolecular organic matter using the EF system.
formula
(8)
formula
(9)
Figure 1

Effect of the (a) initial pH, (b) applied voltage, (c) electrode spacing, and (d) reaction time on the COD removal efficiency of coking wastewater. Experimental conditions: (a) applied voltage = 5 V, electrode spacing = 1 cm, and reaction time = 180 min. (b) Initial pH = 3, electrode spacing = 1 cm, and reaction time = 180 min. (c) Applied voltage = 5 V, initial pH = 3, and reaction time = 180 min. (d) Electrode spacing = 2 cm, initial pH = 3, and applied voltage = 5 V.

Figure 1

Effect of the (a) initial pH, (b) applied voltage, (c) electrode spacing, and (d) reaction time on the COD removal efficiency of coking wastewater. Experimental conditions: (a) applied voltage = 5 V, electrode spacing = 1 cm, and reaction time = 180 min. (b) Initial pH = 3, electrode spacing = 1 cm, and reaction time = 180 min. (c) Applied voltage = 5 V, initial pH = 3, and reaction time = 180 min. (d) Electrode spacing = 2 cm, initial pH = 3, and applied voltage = 5 V.

Close modal

While the degradation rate decreases at a neutral pH of 6–7, it is more than 65%, probably because herein, the iron salt is loaded into the Fe-NCCC electrode, and a heterogeneous EF system is formed in the reaction. The iron catalyst is loaded on the active site of the electrode to catalyze the EF reaction, which has greater resistance to the change in pH of the solution. To a certain extent, the application range of EF pH is widened (Zhao et al. 2016).

Applied voltage

Figure 1(b) shows that the COD removal rate increases with the applied voltage, and a maximum COD removal rate of 83.7% is obtained at an applied voltage of 5 V, but the COD removal rate decreases to 70.2% when the applied voltage is increased to 6 V. This trend can be because increasing the applied voltage increases the current, which accelerates the transfer rate of electrons on the cathode surface and electrochemical reduction reaction of oxygen, thereby promoting the generation of H2O2 and and the decomposition of organic pollutants (Liu et al. 2018). However, an excessive applied voltage leads to side reactions such as the hydrogen reduction reaction, reducing the current efficiency and effectiveness of the COD removal. Therefore, the experimental voltage was selected as 5 V.

Electrode spacing

As shown in Figure 1(c), in the electrode spacing range of 1–5 cm, the COD removal rate first increases and then decreases as the electrode spacing decreases. The maximum COD removal rate of 89.02% is obtained when the electrode spacing is 2 cm, but when the electrode spacing decreases to 1 cm, the COD removal rate decreases to 80.36%. This decrease in the COD removal rate with a decrease in the electrode spacing is because when the electrode spacing decreases, the current density increases (Fukui et al. 1993), which improves the electron transfer rate on the cathode surface and is conducive to generation, thus increasing the COD removal rate. However, when the electrode spacing is less than 2 cm, the COD removal rate decreases for two reasons: (1) the distance between the cathode and anode is too small, leading to the reduction of part of generated in the EF operation at the cathode, and the organic matter is not fully oxidized and decomposed. (2) If the electrode spacing is too small, the high current density promotes the hydrogen evolution side reaction (He et al. 2011), blocking the H2O2 source and reducing the yield of (Wang et al. 2010). However, when the electrode spacing is larger than 2 cm, the COD removal rate continuously decreases because the current density decreases with an increase in the electrode spacing (Sruthi et al. 2018), which reduces the electron transfer rate on the cathode surface and generation. Therefore, the optimal electrode spacing is 2 cm.

Reaction time

As shown in Figure 1(d), as the EF reaction time increases to 30 min, the COD removal rate also increases, and the degradation effect is the most significant in the first 30 min when the initial COD concentration of wastewater decreases from 1,761.6 to 933.7 mg·L−1. Then, the COD removal rate slowly increases. The maximum COD removal rate of 89.13% is achieved at 180 min of EF reaction, and after 180 min, the COD removal rate slightly decreases.

This trend can be because within the first 180 min, most organic matter in wastewater is effectively oxidized and degraded, and macromolecular substances are transformed into small molecular substances via ring-opening and chain-breaking reactions, and the degradation effect of coking wastewater significantly increases. After 180 min of EF reaction, the remaining organic matter in wastewater has a stable structure and is not easily oxidized, and more energy is required to break the chemical bond. Further increasing the reaction time has no significant effect on the degradation of organic matter. Consistent with the findings of Abdulla et al., the reduction in COD removal may be due to the combination of excess and H2O2 (Ghjair & Abbar 2023). Therefore, the reaction time is 180 min.

Optimizing the EF treatment of coking wastewater

Experimental design and results

Based on the results presented in Section 3.1, the process parameters and corresponding COD, TOC, and -N removal were further optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM) combined with BBD. The experimental design and results are shown in Table 2. Design-Expert 8.0 software was used to analyze the experimental data. The second-order polynomial response models were established for the applied voltage (X1), electrode spacing (X2), and initial pH (X3), and removal rates of COD (Y1), TOC (Y2), and -N (Y3), respectively. Regression Equations (10)–(12) are obtained through quadratic fitting, and the predicted values are shown in Table 2.
formula
(10)
formula
(11)
formula
(12)
Table 2

BBD experimental results and predicted values

COD removal rate
TOC removal rate
-N removal rate (%)
SerialFactors coding
ExperimentPredictedAbsoluteExperimentPredictedAbsoluteExperimentPredictedAbsolute
numberX1X2X3valuevalueerrorvaluevalueerrorvaluevalueerror
80% 74.78% 5.22% 38.49% 40.66% −2% 35% 41.29% −6.29% 
74.69% 72.97% 1.72% 69.72% 71.03% −1% 88% 90.40% −2.40% 
86.67% 83.69% 2.98% 60.78% 61.57% −1% 37.25% 42.44% −5.19% 
64.34% 67.32% −2.98% 34.49% 33.70% 1% 58% 52.81% 5.19% 
67.35% 74.81% −7.46% 70% 71.05% −1% 33.00% 48.60% −15.60% 
82.24% 80% 2.24% 66.67% 67.53% −1% 32% 33.11% −1.11% 
67.21% 68.93% −1.72% 52% 50.69% 1% 47.60% 45.20% 2.40% 
58.84% 62.34% −3.50% 66.52% 65.66% 1% 15% 11.11% 3.89% 
72% 74.81% −2.81% 70.12% 71.05% −1% 52% 48.60% 3.40% 
10 78.84% 74.81% 4.03% 74.20% 71.05% 3% 53% 48.60% 4.40% 
11 78.49% 74.81% 3.68% 70.17% 71.05% −1% 53% 48.60% 4.40% 
12 77.35% 74.81% 2.54% 70.78% 71.05% 0% 52% 48.60% 3.40% 
13 90.89% 96.11% −5.22% 72.55% 70.38% 2% 90% 83.71% 6.29% 
14 70.78% 67.28% 3.50% 66.67% 68.05% −1% 60% 63.89% −3.89% 
15 60.49% 62.73% −2.24% 60.04% 58.66% 1% 37% 35.89% 1.11% 
16 76.52% 77.04% −0.52% 40.49% 40.42% 0% 61% 62.29% −1.29% 
17 76.67% 76.15% 0.52% 58.84% 58.91% 0% 56% 54.71% 1.29% 
COD removal rate
TOC removal rate
-N removal rate (%)
SerialFactors coding
ExperimentPredictedAbsoluteExperimentPredictedAbsoluteExperimentPredictedAbsolute
numberX1X2X3valuevalueerrorvaluevalueerrorvaluevalueerror
80% 74.78% 5.22% 38.49% 40.66% −2% 35% 41.29% −6.29% 
74.69% 72.97% 1.72% 69.72% 71.03% −1% 88% 90.40% −2.40% 
86.67% 83.69% 2.98% 60.78% 61.57% −1% 37.25% 42.44% −5.19% 
64.34% 67.32% −2.98% 34.49% 33.70% 1% 58% 52.81% 5.19% 
67.35% 74.81% −7.46% 70% 71.05% −1% 33.00% 48.60% −15.60% 
82.24% 80% 2.24% 66.67% 67.53% −1% 32% 33.11% −1.11% 
67.21% 68.93% −1.72% 52% 50.69% 1% 47.60% 45.20% 2.40% 
58.84% 62.34% −3.50% 66.52% 65.66% 1% 15% 11.11% 3.89% 
72% 74.81% −2.81% 70.12% 71.05% −1% 52% 48.60% 3.40% 
10 78.84% 74.81% 4.03% 74.20% 71.05% 3% 53% 48.60% 4.40% 
11 78.49% 74.81% 3.68% 70.17% 71.05% −1% 53% 48.60% 4.40% 
12 77.35% 74.81% 2.54% 70.78% 71.05% 0% 52% 48.60% 3.40% 
13 90.89% 96.11% −5.22% 72.55% 70.38% 2% 90% 83.71% 6.29% 
14 70.78% 67.28% 3.50% 66.67% 68.05% −1% 60% 63.89% −3.89% 
15 60.49% 62.73% −2.24% 60.04% 58.66% 1% 37% 35.89% 1.11% 
16 76.52% 77.04% −0.52% 40.49% 40.42% 0% 61% 62.29% −1.29% 
17 76.67% 76.15% 0.52% 58.84% 58.91% 0% 56% 54.71% 1.29% 

To test the significance of the experimental design model and reliability of the degree of fit, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression equation error analyses were performed on the experimental data in Table 2. The experimental results are shown in Tables A.1–A.4.

Optimization based on COD removal

As shown in Table A.1, the p-value of the COD model is 0.0490, which is less than 0.05, indicating that this model (Equation (10)) is significant. The lack of fit is the standard used to evaluate the reliability of the model data. The model can be proven to be valid only if the lack of fit is not significant. The p-value of the lack of fit is 0.3406, and it is not significant, indicating that the experimental model data are true and reliable, and the second-order fitting equation can accurately evaluate the data (Zhang et al. 2019).

The larger the multiple correlation coefficient R2, the better the correlation. Table A.4 shows that the R2 of this model is 0.8266, indicating that it can well explain the experimental prediction results. The coefficient of variation (CV) is less than 10%, showing that the model can accurately predict the experimental data. The CV of this model is 7.42%, indicating that the model has high reliability. Adeq Precision, representing the signal-to-noise ratio of the model, is greater than 4, indicating that the design of the experimental model is reasonable. The Adeq precision of the model is 7.984, that is, greater than 4, showing that the designed experimental model is reasonable and can be used to guide the experimental work.

Therefore, the model can be used to fit the COD removal rate of using EF to treat coking wastewater. The F-text was used to analyze the significance of parameters in the model (de Luna et al. 2020). It can be seen that the applied voltage and initial pH significantly affect the COD removal rate of wastewater, whereas the electrode spacing has no significant effect on the COD removal rate, and the square effect of the electrode spacing significantly affects the model. The significance order of the three variables in this model is as follows: applied voltage (X1) > initial pH (X3) > electrode spacing (X2).

The response surface analysis diagrams showing the effects of the applied voltage, electrode spacing, initial pH, and their interaction on the COD removal rate are shown in Figure 2(a)–2(c). The contour diagram in Figure 2(a) shows that at a constant applied voltage, the COD removal rate decreases with an increase in the initial pH. When the applied voltage is 5 V, the COD removal rate is the highest in the pH ranging from 3 to 3.5, consistent with the experimental optimization results. As shown in Figure 2(b), when the applied voltage remains unchanged and electrode spacing decreases from 3 to 1 cm, the COD removal first increases and then decreases, resulting in a large fluctuation of the surface shape and formation of a convex arch. When the electrode spacing is between 1.5 and 2.0 cm, the COD removal rate increases with an increase in applied voltage because the electric energy drives the EF reaction. The higher the applied voltage, the higher the energy the system provides for the EF reaction, which is more conducive to the production of . When the applied voltage is 5 V, the COD removal rate is the best. Therefore, the final optimized applied voltage is 5 V, and the spacing range is 1.5–2 cm. The response surface diagram in Figure 2(c) shows the effect of the interaction between the initial pH and electrode spacing on the COD removal rate. As shown in the 3D plot in Figure 2, when the electrode spacing is not changed, the acidity of the solution gradually increases, and the COD removal rate first decreases and then increases. Therefore, the optimal pH is in the range of 3–3.5. A high concentration of H+ is conducive to the generation of H2O2 and , thus increasing the probability of organic degradation. When the pH is constant, the COD removal rate first increases and then decreases with an increase in the electrode spacing. When the electrode spacing is 2 cm, the COD removal rate is the best.
Figure 2

(a) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and initial pH on the COD removal rate. (b) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and electrode spacing on the COD removal rate. (c) Response surface plot showing the effect of initial pH and electrode spacing on the COD removal rate.

Figure 2

(a) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and initial pH on the COD removal rate. (b) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and electrode spacing on the COD removal rate. (c) Response surface plot showing the effect of initial pH and electrode spacing on the COD removal rate.

Close modal

Optimization based on TOC removal

Table A.2 shows that the p-value of the model is less than 0.0001, indicating that the model is highly significant. The F-value is 60.76, and a high F-value indicates that the model design is meaningful (Baker et al. 2021). The lack of fit term of the model is 0.2531, which is not significant, indicating that the selected model is suitable. The higher the multivariate correlation coefficient R2, the better the correlation. As shown in Table A.4, the R2 of the model is 0.9874, indicating that the model can explain 98.74% of the results. The Adj-R2 value of 0.9711 is close to R2, and both are close to 1. The model is highly reliable and can truly reflect the relationship between the experimental and predicted values. CV is 3.49%, considerably less than 10%, further verifying the good fit of the experiment and the validity of the model.

To sum up, this model (Equation (11)) can fit and predict the TOC removal of coking wastewater using the EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC. The interactions between the applied voltage and initial pH and electrode spacing and initial pH had significant impacts on the TOC removal rate, whereas the interaction between the applied voltage and electrode spacing had no significant impact on the TOC removal rate.

As shown in Table A.2, because p > F-value, the order of significance of the three variables in this model is as follows: initial pH (X3) > applied voltage (X1) > electrode spacing (X2). The initial pH has a significant effect on the TOC removal rate, and its p-value is less than 0.0001. The square effect of the applied voltage and initial pH is significant, and its p-value is less than 0.05. However, the square effect of the electrode spacing is not significant, and its p-value is 0.0717.

Figure 3(a)–3(c) shows the effect of the interaction between the applied voltage, initial pH, and electrode spacing on the TOC degradation in coking wastewater. The closer the contour shape is to an ellipse, the more significant the interaction between the two variables. The closer the contour shape is to a circle, the less significant the interaction between the two variables (De Laat et al. 1999). The interaction between parameters can be determined using the contour shape of the map (Zhu et al. 2011; Thirugnanasambandham & Sivakumar 2015). As shown in Figure 3(a), the contour diagram is almost circular, indicating that the interaction between applied voltage and electrode spacing has a minimal effect on the TOC removal rate in wastewater, although each of these two parameters has a significant effect on the TOC removal rate. Combining the two figures shows that the best removal rate is achieved when the applied voltage = 4.9–5 V and electrode spacing = 2–2.5 cm. As shown in Figure 3(b), the contour map is oval, and the interaction between the applied voltage and initial pH is significant. As can be seen from the 3D figure, when the applied voltage is constant, the TOC removal rate first increases and then decreases with an increase in initial pH, and the curve changes sharply. Therefore, adjusting pH significantly affects the TOC removal rate. On the contrary, when the initial pH is constant, the TOC removal rate fluctuates less when the applied voltage is changed. Combined with Table A.5, it can be seen that these two parameters are significant factors in the model, but the p-value of initial pH is less than 0.0001, which is highly significant. The effect of the change in initial pH on the TOC removal rate in the reaction is greater than that of the change in applied voltage; therefore, the interaction between the two factors is obvious. The contour plot shown in Figure 3(c) is in an oval shape, indicating that the interaction between the electrode spacing and the initial pH significantly impacts the TOC removal rate in wastewater. Among the two factors, a change in initial pH has more influence on the TOC removal rate than a change in the electrode spacing. According to the 3D response surface diagram, when the electrode spacing is constant and the initial pH increases from 3.0 to 3.85, the TOC removal rate gradually increases. When pH increases from 3.85 to 4.5, the TOC removal rate decreases, indicating that changing the pH significantly affects the TOC removal rate. When pH is constant, adjusting the electrode spacing has a similar effect on the TOC removal rate, but the change in the TOC removal rate is not very obvious. This indicates that in the process of TOC removal of wastewater, the initial pH of the solution is more important than the electrode spacing, which is also reflected in the ANOVA table. The p-value of the initial pH is less than 0.0001, which is highly significant.
Figure 3

(a) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and electrode spacing on the TOC removal rate. (b) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and initial pH on the TOC removal rate. (c) Response surface plot showing the effect of electrode spacing and initial pH on the TOC removal rate.

Figure 3

(a) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and electrode spacing on the TOC removal rate. (b) Response surface plot showing the effect of applied voltage and initial pH on the TOC removal rate. (c) Response surface plot showing the effect of electrode spacing and initial pH on the TOC removal rate.

Close modal

Optimization based on -N removal

According to Table A.3, the p-value of the model is 0.0051, that is, less than 0.05, and the lack of fit term is not significant, indicating that the model is significant, and the fitting degree is good in the selected fitting interval. Table A.4 shows that the R2 of this model is 0.916, indicating that the model can explain 91.6% of the predicted results and can truly reflect the relationship between the experimental and predicted values. The Adeq precision value of the model is 12.409, higher than 4, further verifying that the experimental design is reasonable and that the model is well established.

Therefore, this model (Equation (12)) can fit the -N removal rate in coking wastewater treated using the EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC. Among them, the interaction between the electrode spacing and initial pH significantly affects the -N removal rate, and the square effect of the initial pH of the solution is highly significant. The three variables in this model significantly impact -N removal because their p-values are less than 0.05 (Table A.3). The significance order is as follows: electrode spacing (X2) > applied voltage (X1) > initial pH (X3).

By comparing the effects of the three factors on the three indices, it can be concluded that the initial pH of the wastewater has the greatest effect on the TOC removal rate, followed by COD removal, and the least effect on -N. This may be because the initial pH of the solution mainly affects the generation of in the Fenton reaction, and the thorough mineralization of organic compounds is more dependent on (Wang et al. 2012; Hou et al. 2016), while the indirect oxidation of the anode also plays a major role in the removal of -N (Qiang et al. 2003). Figure 4(a) shows a change in the electrode spacing, which has a greater impact on the -N removal rate than a change in the initial pH. The 3D surface diagram shows an arch; therefore, the interaction between the two factors is quite significant. According to the 3D figure in Figure 4, when pH is constant, the -N removal rate increases with a decrease in electrode spacing. When the electrode spacing is constant, the -N removal rate gradually decreases as the initial pH increases from 3.0 to 5.0. The pH close to 3.0 is more conducive to -N degradation.
Figure 4

(a) Response surface plot showing the effect of electrode spacing and initial pH on the -N removal rate. (b) Response surface plot showing the effect of electrode spacing and applied voltage on the -N removal rate. (c) Response surface plot showing the effect of initial pH and applied voltage on the -N removal rate.

Figure 4

(a) Response surface plot showing the effect of electrode spacing and initial pH on the -N removal rate. (b) Response surface plot showing the effect of electrode spacing and applied voltage on the -N removal rate. (c) Response surface plot showing the effect of initial pH and applied voltage on the -N removal rate.

Close modal

The 3D figure in Figure 4(b) has a steep slope, indicating that the changes in these two parameters strongly affect the -N removal rate in the EF reaction. When the applied voltage is constant and electrode spacing changes from 3 to 1 cm, the -N removal rate increases from 12.15 to 50.53%. The smaller the electrode spacing, the higher the current density and the better the -N removal rate. At a certain electrode spacing, the higher the voltage, the better the -N removal rate. When the applied voltage is 5 V, the removal rate of -N is the highest. Therefore, decreasing the electrode spacing and increasing the applied voltage is beneficial to removing -N.

As shown in the 3D figure in Figure 4(c), when the voltage is constant at 5 V and the solution pH changes from 3 to 5, -N removal first decreases and then increases; when the pH is 3, the optimal removal rate is 82%. This is because under acidic conditions, owing to the high yield of , -N is oxidized to N2 under the strong oxidation action of , as shown in Equation (13), which is more conducive to the oxidative decomposition of -N with a good removal rate (Zhou et al. 2007). When the initial pH is constant, the -N removal rate increases gradually with an increase in the applied voltage because the higher the applied voltage, the greater the energy provided by the system, the faster the electron transfer rate in the reaction, and the higher the ·OH production; therefore, the -N removal rate is good. The removal rate of -N is maximum when the applied voltage is 5 V and pH = 3.
formula
(13)

According to the aforementioned research and analysis, the BBD models obtained in this experiment are significant and can be predicted within the range of selected experimental parameters. At the same time, under the optimal conditions (applied voltage, electrode spacing, and initial pH) optimized using the models, the experiment was performed to compare the difference between the predicted and real values, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Analysis of model verification

ItemCODTOC-N
Applied voltage (V) 4.92 4.83 4.99 
Electrode spacing (cm) 2.29 1.06 1.11 
Initial pH 3.01 3.29 3.00 
Predictive value (%) 92.13 73.91 78 
Actual value (%) 89.96 73.44 84.12 
ItemCODTOC-N
Applied voltage (V) 4.92 4.83 4.99 
Electrode spacing (cm) 2.29 1.06 1.11 
Initial pH 3.01 3.29 3.00 
Predictive value (%) 92.13 73.91 78 
Actual value (%) 89.96 73.44 84.12 

According to the experimental results obtained under the optimal conditions, the errors between the experimental and predicted values of COD, TOC, and -N are 2.17%, 0.47%, and 6.12%, respectively, indicating that the response surface models are reasonable and can be applied.

Characterization of organic pollutants in coking wastewater

FT-IR spectroscopy analysis

FT-IR analysis was performed on coking wastewater before and after the EF reaction under optimal conditions based on COD removal, and the results are shown in Figure 5(a). The characteristic absorption peaks of organic compounds in the FT-IR spectra of coking wastewater before and after treatment are almost the same, that is, the FT-IR spectra of coking wastewater before and after treatment show seven obvious absorption peaks: (1) Before the coking wastewater treatment, the FT-IR spectra shows a peak at 3,407.07 cm−1, corresponding to the –OH stretching vibration, and this peak has a high absorption intensity and is sharp. After the coking wastewater treatment, the peak for –OH stretching vibration appears at 3,600–3,200 cm−1, and the intensity is reduced. According to Li et al. (2015), the peaks for hydroxyl groups appear in the range from 3,400 to 3,230 cm−1 and 3,440 to 3,245 cm−1 for alcoholic hydroxyl R–O–H and phenolic hydroxyl AR–O–H, respectively, which are attributed to the presence of phenol, alcohol, –COOH, and other substances in the wastewater. (2) The FT-IR spectrum of the coking wastewater sample exhibits an obvious absorption peak in the range of 2,400–2,000 cm−1 before the treatment, attributed to the stretching vibration of the unsaturated double bond and triple bond, and the intensity of this peak decreases after the treatment. (3) The FT-IR spectra of the wastewater before and after EF treatment show peaks in the range of 1,000–800 cm−1, corresponding to C–H vibration and carbohydrate absorption, and the absorption intensity of these peaks decreases after the treatment. (4) In addition to the characteristic peak of the hydroxyl group, the FT-IR spectrum also shows peaks for aromatic C = C stretching vibration and heterocyclic vibration peaks at 1,600 cm−1 and 1,500–1,450 cm−1, respectively (Gao et al. 2022). They are the characteristic peaks of aromatic hydrocarbon in wastewater, and the absorption intensity decreases after the reaction (Wang et al. 2013). (5) The FT-IR spectrum of raw coking wastewater shows a sharp C–X absorption peak in the range of 800–400 cm−1, and the absorption peak in the range of 1,200–1,000 cm−1 corresponds to the C–O bond and is attributed to the presence of ester and phenolic compounds in the wastewater. After the treatment, the absorption of the C–O peak decreases. (6) The peaks in the ranges of 800–600 cm−1 and 600–500 cm−1 correspond to the characteristic absorption peaks of the C–Cl bond and C–BR bond, respectively, and the intensity of the effluent peak decreases after the treatment (Zhang et al. 2012; Mo et al. 2018).
Figure 5

(a) FT-IR spectra of coking wastewater and effluent, (b) GC–MS spectrum of coking raw water, (c) GC–MS spectrum of the effluent of coking wastewater, (d) kinetic analysis of COD degradation using the EF system, (e) change in color of coking wastewater with the reaction time during the EF process, and (f) EC analysis during the reaction of coking wastewater. Experimental conditions: (a)–(f) applied voltage = 4.92 V, electrode spacing = 2.29 cm, initial pH = 3, and reaction time = 180 min.

Figure 5

(a) FT-IR spectra of coking wastewater and effluent, (b) GC–MS spectrum of coking raw water, (c) GC–MS spectrum of the effluent of coking wastewater, (d) kinetic analysis of COD degradation using the EF system, (e) change in color of coking wastewater with the reaction time during the EF process, and (f) EC analysis during the reaction of coking wastewater. Experimental conditions: (a)–(f) applied voltage = 4.92 V, electrode spacing = 2.29 cm, initial pH = 3, and reaction time = 180 min.

Close modal

Therefore, the coking wastewater contains unsaturated C = O bonds, aromatic compounds, and compounds containing methyl before and after the EF process, and the intensities of the absorption peaks are reduced to different degrees after the treatment, indicating that the Fe-NCCC has a good removal effect on the aforementioned organic compounds. The intensity of absorption peak at 3,407.07 cm−1 in the FT-IR spectrum of the water sample after treatment is significantly reduced, indicating that the system has the most significant degradation effect on phenolic hydroxyl substances. The intensity of the absorption peak at 3,407.07 cm−1 in the FT-IR spectrum significantly decreases, indicating that the system has the most significant degradation effect on phenolic hydroxyl compounds.

GC–MS analysis

The organic composition of coking wastewater and effluent after treatment using the EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC was analyzed via GC–MS, as shown in Figure 5(b) and 5(c). Different kinds of organic compounds are present in coking wastewater. A comparison of Table A.5 shows that the types and contents of organic compounds change in coking wastewater before and after treatment.

GC–MS analysis shows that coking wastewater mainly contains phenols, nitrogen-containing heterocycles, quinolines, PAHs, oxygen-containing heterocycles, alkanes, and other organic pollutants. The contents of these substances in the wastewater are relatively high, accounting for ∼89.13% of the total organic pollutants. In addition, quinoline, indole, 5H-indeno[1, 2-B]pyridine, 1-indanone, and other pollutants are also present in the wastewater. After the EF treatment, the wastewater mainly contains styrene, dimethyl phthalate, and long-chain alkanes. By comparing the pollutants present in the wastewater before and after the EF treatment, it can be seen that after the EF treatment, the types and contents of organic compounds in the effluent significantly decrease; most of the macromolecular organic compounds with complex structures disappear, and the characteristic phenolic substances in coking wastewater are not detected. Therefore, the Fe-NCCC can effectively decompose complex macromolecules from organic matter via the EF process, weaken the toxicity of coking wastewater (Ren et al. 2019; Q. Zhao et al. 2019), and reduce pollution indicators such as COD and TOC.

Kinetic study of COD removal

The dynamic analysis of COD degradation in coking wastewater was performed using the EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC. COD removal was measured, and its removal rate was calculated every 30 min. The experimental results are shown in Table A.6. Linear fitting regression was performed on the experimental data, and the reaction order was determined (Table 4). The COD kinetic analysis diagram is shown in Figure 5(d).

Table 4

Data linear regression analysis table of the COD of coking wastewater

Reaction orderXYABR2
341.13036 7.52387 0.85589 
lnC 0.07486 0.01122 0.95990 
1/C 0.01006E 2.28748E-5 0.82881 
Reaction orderXYABR2
341.13036 7.52387 0.85589 
lnC 0.07486 0.01122 0.95990 
1/C 0.01006E 2.28748E-5 0.82881 

According to the fitting results in Table 4 and Figure 5(d), the fitting effect of the quasi-first-order kinetic equation is better with a correlation coefficient R2 of 0.9599, and the reaction conforms to the quasi-first-order kinetic equation. The reaction kinetic model is ln (C0/Ct) = 0.01122t − 0.07486, and the reaction rate constant K is 0.01122 min−1.

Color removal and biodegradability analysis

Figure 5(e) shows that the color of coking wastewater decreases from 250-folds to colorless in a reaction time of 120 min, demonstrating that sufficient is generated in the EF reaction to oxidize and decompose chromogenic groups, phenols, and other macromolecules in wastewater, allowing its rapid degradation and decolorization. After 180 min of the reaction, the BOD5/COD of coking wastewater increases from 0.126 to 0.34, indicating that the EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC can improve the biodegradability of coking wastewater.

EC analysis

The EC of the treatment of coking wastewater using the EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC was analyzed. According to Equation (6), the EC of a unit of COD was calculated. The EC changing with reaction time is shown in Figure 5(f). The corresponding average current in the reaction is 0.97 A, and the experimental water consumption is 300 mL.

Figure 5(f) shows that as the reaction time increases, the unit EC of COD gradually increases, indicating that with an increase in reaction time, the COD removal rate of the reaction system gradually increases, and the COD concentration gradually decreases. When the reaction time is 180 min, the COD concentration decreases from 1,761.14 to 180.12 mg·L−1. After the calculation, the EC is only 30 kW·h (kg COD−1), which is because is produced by the EF system using the Fe-NCCC, and plays a major role in the EF reaction and decreases COD with high decomposition efficiency. At the same time, the electrode conductivity is good, the heat loss is reduced, and the current efficiency is improved; therefore, the unit EC of COD is lower than those reported in the literature (Table 5).

Table 5

Comparison of energy consumption of coking wastewater treated by electrochemical method

Processing methodElectrode/catalystEC (kW·h (kgCOD) −1)Treatment effectReferences
Electrochemical oxidation Anode: Ti/RuO2–IrO2 Cathode: Mesh titanium 114.4 The COD and -N concentration degraded 86 and 100% in 80 min at the current density of 5 mA·cm−2Wang et al. (2014)  
Electrochemical oxidation Catalyst: Black titanium oxide nanotube array 63–68 The BOD/COD was from 0.19 to above 0.3 in 4 h at a current density of 2 mA·cm−2Liu et al. (2021)  
Electrochemical oxidation Anode: BDD
Cathode: Stainless steel 
67.9 The COD, BOD5, -N, and N removal efficiency was 48.74%, −63.82%, 21.15%, and −2.57%, respectively. Wang et al. (2015)  
Electro-Fenton Anode: Ti/SnO2–Sb
Cathode: Steel 
396.56 The COD and TOC removal yields of the coking wastewater were 83.05% and 74.56%, respectively. He et al. (2022)  
Electro-Fenton Anode: Fe-NCCC
Cathode: DSA 
30 The COD, -N, and TOC removal efficiency was 89.96%, 84.12%, and 73.44%, respectively. This study 
Processing methodElectrode/catalystEC (kW·h (kgCOD) −1)Treatment effectReferences
Electrochemical oxidation Anode: Ti/RuO2–IrO2 Cathode: Mesh titanium 114.4 The COD and -N concentration degraded 86 and 100% in 80 min at the current density of 5 mA·cm−2Wang et al. (2014)  
Electrochemical oxidation Catalyst: Black titanium oxide nanotube array 63–68 The BOD/COD was from 0.19 to above 0.3 in 4 h at a current density of 2 mA·cm−2Liu et al. (2021)  
Electrochemical oxidation Anode: BDD
Cathode: Stainless steel 
67.9 The COD, BOD5, -N, and N removal efficiency was 48.74%, −63.82%, 21.15%, and −2.57%, respectively. Wang et al. (2015)  
Electro-Fenton Anode: Ti/SnO2–Sb
Cathode: Steel 
396.56 The COD and TOC removal yields of the coking wastewater were 83.05% and 74.56%, respectively. He et al. (2022)  
Electro-Fenton Anode: Fe-NCCC
Cathode: DSA 
30 The COD, -N, and TOC removal efficiency was 89.96%, 84.12%, and 73.44%, respectively. This study 

The EC of the EF system calculated from the experiment under optimal conditions is as follows:
formula
(14)
formula
(15)

At an industrial electricity price of 0.5 RMB Yuan per KWh, the electricity consumption cost of the EF system for treating 1 m3 of coking wastewater is 23.5 RMB Yuan.

The Fe-NCCC is used as the cathode and DSA as the anode to form an EF system to treat coking wastewater. The COD removal rate was 89.96% under optimum conditions of an applied voltage of 4.92 V, an electrode spacing of 2.29 cm, and an initial pH of 3.01; the optimized removal rate of -N was 84.12% under the condition of an applied voltage 4.99 V, an electrode spacing 1.11 cm, and an initial pH of 3; and TOC reached 73.44% under optimum conditions of an applied voltage 4.83 V, an electrode spacing 1.06 cm, and an initial pH of 3.29, respectively. The applied voltage and initial pH influence the COD, -N, and TOC removal. The electrode spacing significantly affects the -N and TOC removal. The initial pH has the greatest effect on TOC removal, followed by COD removal, and the least effect on -N because the initial pH mainly affects the generation of in the Fenton reaction, and the thorough mineralization of organic compounds is more dependent on , while the indirect oxidation of the anode also plays a major role in the removal of -N. The degradation mechanism of the EF system for organic pollutants in coking wastewater is as follows: the Fe-NCCC generates via electrocatalysis to decompose phenols, quinolines, PAHs, and oxygen- and nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds. The cost of treating 1 m3 of coking wastewater is ∼23.5 RMB Yuan. The EF system comprising the Fe-NCCC can effectively remove pollutants from coking wastewater with low power consumption while reducing various pollution indicators, demonstrating that the Fe-NCCC can serve as a cost-effective EF cathode in refractory industrial wastewater treatment.

This work was supported by the Research Foundation of the University of Science and Technology Liaoning (2019FW03).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahmed
S.
,
Rasul
M. G.
,
Martens
W. N.
,
Brown
R.
&
Hashib
M. A.
2010
Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenols in wastewater: a review on current status and developments
.
Desalination
261
(
1–2
),
3
18
.
Baker
A.
,
Ahmad
B.
,
Alarjani
K. M.
,
Aldosri
N. s.
&
Khan
M. S.
2021
Biostimulation of Rhodovulum sp., for enhanced degradation of di-n-butyl phthalate under optimum conditions
.
Chemosphere
266
(
xxxx
),
128998
.
Chi
C.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Meng
G.
,
Hu
Y.
&
Bai
Z.
2022
Preparation of needle coke composite cathode and its treatment of RhB wastewater
.
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
920
(
February
),
116612
.
Deng
F.
,
Qiu
S.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Yang
J.
&
Ma
F.
2019
Tripolyphosphate- assisted electro-Fenton process for coking wastewater treatment at neutral pH
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
26
(
12
),
11928
11939
.
Farid
M.
,
Mirvet
A.
&
Nacera
Y. M.
2021
Degradation of atenolol in a rectangular staircase photocatalytic reactor with immobilized ZnO
.
Chemical Engineering and Technology
44
(
1
),
140
147
.
Gabdulkhakov
R. R.
,
Rudko
V. A.
,
Povarov
V. G.
,
Ugolkov
V. L.
,
Pyagay
I. N.
&
Smyshlyaeva
K. I.
2021
Technology of petroleum needle coke production in processing of decantoil with the use of polystyrene as a polymeric mesogen additive
.
ACS Omega
6
(
30
),
19995
20005
.
Gao
X.
,
Zhang
C.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Zhao
M.
&
Wang
Y.
2022
Treatment of membrane concentrated landfill leachate by a heterogeneous electro-Fenton process with an iron-loaded needle coke cathode
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
10
,
108287
.
Garcia-Segura
S.
,
Garrido
J. A.
,
Rodríguez
R. M.
,
Cabot
P. L.
,
Centellas
F.
,
Arias
C.
&
Brillas
E.
2012
Mineralization of flumequine in acidic medium by electro-Fenton and photoelectro-Fenton processes
.
Water Research
46
(
7
),
2067
2076
.
Ghjair, A. Y. & Abbar, A. H. 2023 Applications of advanced oxidation processes (Electro-Fenton and sono-electro-Fenton) for COD removal from hospital wastewater: Optimization using response surface methodology. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 169, 481–492.
Güçlü
D.
,
Şahinkaya
S.
&
Şirin
N.
2013
Post-treatment of coking industry wastewater by the electro-Fenton process
.
Water Environment Research
85
(
5
),
391
396
.
He
X. W.
,
Liu
L. Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zhang
G.
,
Gong
J. W.
,
Lin
H.
,
Wang
J. B.
&
Qin
Q.
2011
Electrochemical treatment of residual ammonia nitrogen in biologically pretreated coking wastewater with three-dimensional electrodes
.
Water Science and Technology
63
(
11
),
2732
2736
.
He
L.
,
Wang
C.
,
Chen
X.
,
Jiang
L.
,
Ji
Y.
,
Li
H.
,
Liu
Y.
&
Wang
J.
2022
Preparation of Tin–Antimony anode modified with carbon nanotubes for electrochemical treatment of coking wastewater
.
Chemosphere
288
(
P2
),
132362
.
Hou
M.
,
Chu
Y.
,
Li
X.
,
Wang
H.
,
Yao
W.
,
Yu
G.
,
Murayama
S.
&
Wang
Y.
2016
Electro-peroxone degradation of diethyl phthalate: cathode selection, operational parameters, and degradation mechanisms
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
319
,
61
68
.
Kim
Y. M.
,
Park
D.
,
Lee
D. S.
&
Park
J. M.
2008
Inhibitory effects of toxic compounds on nitrification process for cokes wastewater treatment
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
152
(
3
),
915
921
.
Li
S.
,
Lv
Y.
&
Liu
Z.
2015
Preparation of composite coagulant of PFM- PDMDAAC and its coagulation performance in treatment of landfill leachate
.
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
5 (2),
177
188
.
Meng
G.
,
Yu
F.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Li
X.
,
Gao
X.
,
Bai
Z.
,
Tang
Y.
&
Wei
J.
2023
Heterogeneous electro-Fenton treatment of coking wastewater using Fe/AC/Ni cathode: optimization of electrode and reactor organic loading
.
Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)
1
41
.
Mo
J.
,
Yang
Q.
,
Zhang
N.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Zheng
Y.
&
Zhang
Z.
2018
A review on agro-industrial waste (AIW) derived adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment
.
Journal of Environmental Management
227
(
August
),
395
405
.
Poza-Nogueiras
V.
,
Rosales
E.
,
Pazos
M.
&
Sanromán
M. Á
.
2018
Current advances and trends in electro-Fenton process using heterogeneous catalysts – a review
.
Chemosphere
201
,
399
416
.
Qiang
Z.
,
Chang
J. H.
&
Huang
C. P.
2003
Electrochemical regeneration of Fe2+ in Fenton oxidation processes
.
Water Research
37
(
6
),
1308
1319
.
Saidi
S.
,
Boudrahem
F.
,
Yahiaoui
I.
&
Aissani-Benissad
F.
2019
Agar-agar impregnated on porous activated carbon as a new adsorbent for Pb(II) removal
.
Water Science and Technology
79
(
7
),
1316
1326
.
Sruthi
T.
,
Gandhimathi
R.
,
Ramesh
S. T.
&
Nidheesh
P. V.
2018
Stabilized landfill leachate treatment using heterogeneous Fenton and electro-Fenton processes
.
Chemosphere
210
,
38
43
.
Thirugnanasambandham
K.
&
Sivakumar
V.
2015
Optimization of treatment of grey wastewater using electro-Fenton technique – modeling and validation
.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
95
,
60
68
.
Wang
C. R.
,
Hou
Z. F.
,
Zhang
M. R.
,
Qi
J.
&
Wang
J.
2015
Electrochemical oxidation using BDD anodes combined with biological aerated filter for biotreated coking wastewater treatment
.
Journal of Chemistry
2015
,
201350
.
Wang
Y.
,
Li
X.
,
Zhen
L.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Zhang
Y.
&
Wang
C.
2012
Electro- Fenton treatment of concentrates generated in nanofiltration of biologically pretreated landfill leachate
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
229–230
,
115
121
.
Wang
Z.
,
Gao
M.
,
Wang
Z.
,
She
Z.
,
Chang
Q.
,
Sun
C.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Ren
Y.
&
Yang
N.
2013
Effect of salinity on extracellular polymeric substances of activated sludge from an anoxic-aerobic sequencing batch reactor
.
Chemosphere
93
(
11
),
2789
2795
.
Wang
H. D.
,
Gao
K.
&
Lu
B.
2014
Electrochemical catalytic oxidation treatment of coking wastewater RO brine
.
Advanced Materials Research
838–841
,
2751
2758
.
Yang
S.
,
Kim
I. J.
,
Choi
I. S.
,
Bae
M. K.
&
Kim
H. S.
2013
Influence of electrolytes (TEABF4 and TEMABF4) on electrochemical performance of graphite oxide derived from needle coke
.
Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
13
(
5
),
3747
3751
.
Zhang
W.
,
Wei
C.
,
Chai
X.
,
He
J.
,
Cai
Y.
,
Ren
M.
,
Yan
B.
,
Peng
P.
&
Fu
J.
2012
The behaviors and fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a coking wastewater treatment plant
.
Chemosphere
88
(
2
),
174
182
.
Zhao
Q.
,
Wei
F.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Lv
S.
&
Yao
Y.
2019
Electrochemical oxidation treatment of coal tar wastewater with lead dioxide anodes
.
Water Science and Technology
80 (5), 836–845
.
Zheng
D.
,
Pei
S.
,
Geng
S.
&
Zhang
L.
2019
Synthesis of Fe – Fe3O4/rGO composite with heterostructure through room-temperature reduction as photo- Fenton catalyst
.
Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
19
(
9
),
5858
5863
.
Zhou
M.
,
Fu
W.
,
Gu
H.
&
Lei
L.
2007
Nitrate removal from groundwater by a novel three-dimensional electrode biofilm reactor
.
Electrochimica Acta
52
(
19
),
6052
6059
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Supplementary data